TODAY’S NEWS : November 01, 2012
” WAKING UP THE WORLD ONE DAY AT A TIME ! “
You’re Eight Times More Likely to be Killed by a Police Officer than a Terrorist
From the Trenches World Report
Posted on October 31, 2012 by # 1 NWO Hatr
It got a lot of attention this morning when I tweeted, “You’re Eight Times More Likely to be Killed by a Police Officer than a Terrorist.”
It’s been quickly retweeted dozens of times, indicating that the idea is interesting to many people.
So let’s discuss it in more than 140 characters.
In case it needs saying: Police officers are unlike terrorists in almost all respects.
Crucially, the goal of the former, in their vastest majority, is to have a stable, peaceful, safe, law-abiding society, which is a goal we all share.
The goal of the latter is … well, it’s complicated.
Needless to say, the goal of terrorists is not that peaceful, safe, stable society.
I picked up the statistic from a blog post called: “Fear of Terror Makes People Stupid,” which in turn cites the National Safety Council for this and lots of other numbers reflecting likelihoods of dying from various causes.
So dispute the number(s) with them, if you care to.
I take it as a given that your mileage may vary.
If you dwell in the suburbs or a rural area, and especially if you’re wealthy, white, and well-spoken, your likelihood of death from these two sources probably converges somewhat (at very close to zero).
The point of the quote is to focus people on sources of mortality society-wide, because this focus can guide public policy efforts at reducing death. (Thus, the number is not a product of the base rate fallacy.)
In my opinion, too many people are still transfixed by terrorism despite the collapse of Al Qaeda over the last decade and the quite manageable—indeed, the quite well-managed—danger that terrorism presents our society today.
If you want to indulge your fears and prioritize terrorism, you’ll have plenty of help, and neither this blog post nor any other appeal to reason or statistics is likely to convince you.
Among the John Mueller articles I would recommend, though, is “Witches, Communists, and Terrorists: Evaluating the Risks and Tallying the Costs” (with Mark Stewart).
If one wants to be clinical about what things reduce death to Americans, one should ask why police officers are such a significant source of danger.
I have some ideas.
Cato’s work on the War on Drugs shows how it produces danger to the public and law enforcement both, not to mention loss of privacy and civil liberties, disrespect for law enforcement, disregard of the rule of law, and so on.
Is the sum total of mortality and morbidity reduced or increased by the War on Drugs?
I don’t know to say.
But the War on Drugs certainly increases the danger to innocent people (including law enforcement personnel), where drug legalization would allow harm to naturally concentrate on the people who choose unwisely to use drugs.
The militarization of law enforcement probably contributes to the danger.
Cato’s Botched Paramilitary Police Raids map illustrates the problem of over-aggressive policing. Cato alum Radley Balko now documents these issues at the Huffington Post.
Try out his “Cop or Soldier?” quiz.
There are some bad apples in the police officer barrel. Given the power that law enforcement personnel have—up to and including the power to kill—I’m not satisfied that standards of professionalism are up to snuff.
You can follow the Cato Institute’s National Police Misconduct Reporting Project on Twitter at @NPMRP.
If the provocative statistic cited above got your attention, that’s good.
If it adds a little more to your efforts at producing a safe, stable, peaceful, and free society, all the better.
(Older article that deserves repeating as the sheeple are still asleep !)~~~Xaniel777
Finally: Barry Chamish Concedes Israel’s Involvement in 9/11
Zionist Extremist Chamish Admits Bollyn is Right, Zionists did 9/11!!
Barry Chamish admits the Zionist mob did 9/11: “But not MY right-wing Zionist mob! It was those other guys, those Labor Zionists! Really! Trust me!”
From Veterans Today
by Kevin Barrett - August 15, 2012
Barry Chamish is one of the most radical, out-of-control Zionists you’ll ever meet.
Chamish is so extreme right-wing pro-settler, pro-Greater-Israel, pro-Jabotinsky, pro-Zio-terrorist, he makes Netanyahu look like a peace-loving statesman.
But one thing you can say about Chamish: He’s not stupid, he has guts, and he pretty much calls it the way he sees it.
At the personal level, I actually like the guy.
So when Chamish recently wrote what he intended as a hostile review of Christopher Bollyn’s Solving 9/11, but couldn’t help admitting that Bollyn was basically right,
that the big-money Zionist mob did 9/11 with the help of Mossad and its American assets…well, that’s about the highest praise Bollyn could ever get.
Chamish claims it was the “Labor Zionists” that did 9/11, and faults Bollyn for failing to exonerate the likes of Netanyahu.
But the evidence shows that Bollyn is right, and Chamish is wrong: Netanyahu was obviously a key player in the 9/11 conspiracy.
Bollyn cites Netanyahu’s 1979 Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism(JCIT) where the whole game-plan for the upcoming “war on terror,” i.e. the war on Israel’s enemies, was developed.
Chamish fatuously writes: “In 1980, Netanyahu was selling furniture at the RIM company and not formulating plans for 9-11.”
The seminal importance of Netanyahu’s JCIT in creating the “war on terror” out of whole cloth, and setting the stage for 9/11, is obvious to anyone who reads Netanyahu’s book that came out of JCIT.
In that compilation, arch-Zionist Orientalist Bernard Lewis reveals his plan, supported by the pro-Israel wing of Western intelligence agencies, to create a modern version of the medieval assassins – namely, al-CIA-duh – and use it to smash the Middle East to pieces on behalf of Israel (the Oded Yinon plan).
If that isn’t the game plan for 9/11, what is?
(Bernard Lewis was the first person from outside the government to meet with George W. Bush in the immediate aftermath of 9/11; obviously he was there to quarterback 9/11 and its intended aftermath.)
If there are any doubts that Netanyahu is at the top of the list of 9/11 criminals, they should be dispelled by the reports informing us that Netanyahu and confessed insurance fraudster and 9/11 demolition criminal Larry Silverstein is such a close friend of Netanyahu’s that they speak on the phone every single week.
Chamish claims that Bollyn fails to see that Likud and Netanyahu are the good guys, and the Labor Zionists the bad guys, due to Bollyn’s supposedly anti-Zionist or anti-Jewish ideology.
But it is actually Chamish who is letting his raving-extremist Likudnik ideology blind him to some of the simple, obvious facts of 9/11, including the involvement of his heroes Sharon and Netanyahu.
Related Posts :
Obama Rejects Palestinian Statehood
Posted by poorrichard’s blog
October 30th, 2012 | Posted by Stephen Lendman
What do you call a Black man who rejects equal rights for his own people and others?
A racist traitor.
What do you call a rejectionist leader?
A criminal who should be impeached, removed and prosecuted.
Obama stands guilty on multiple counts.
His rap sheet includes much more than spurning Palestinian rights.
He’s complicit in grand theft and war crimes multiple times over. He’s unfit to serve.
He should be in prison, not government.
Throughout his tenure, he repeatedly violated international, constitutional, and US statute laws.
He’s contemptuous of fundamental rights and other democratic values.
From his earliest Chicago political days, he supported ethnic cleansing gentrification.
Real estate and other financial priorities trumped populism. They still do and much more.
Obama fronts for wealth and power interests. As a state senator, he did it for his district.
As president, he does it globally. He’s in lockstep with Israel on Palestine.
He supports occupation harshness. Palestinians are Muslims and don’t matter. Denying them fundamental rights is policy.
So is total evisceration of freedom and standing four-square against sovereign independence in any form.
He also opposes full or limited UN membership.
Washington wages wars multiple ways. Its repertoire includes financial and political warfare.
Last year, US Jerusalem Consul General, Daniel Rubenstein, told chief negotiator Saeb Erekat that Washington will veto a UN Security Council resolution on Palestinian sovereignty within June 1967 borders.
Doing so is illegal. It also carries no weight.
The General Assembly alone affirms new member states by a two-thirds vote.
The Security Council only recommends admissions.
Palestinians can override Washington’s veto by petitioning the General Assembly through the 1950 Uniting for Peace Resolution 377.
Doing so renders America’s veto null and void.
Washington pledged earlier not to oppose any state seeking UN membership.
Of course, its promises aren’t worth the paper they’re written on.
The same goes for Israel. Both nations are rogue states.
They govern by we’re boss and what we say goes rules.
Rubenstein also threatened to cut off all aid and impose other unspecified punitive measures.
In July 2012, PA official Khaled Mesmar said Washington repeated its threat.
An unnamed US diplomat told Abbas in Ramallah.
He, of course, only goes through the motions of seeking official statehood recognition and UN membership with enough rights to matter.
Rhetoric substitutes for follow-through.
If proper procedures are followed, both objectives are within easy reach. Abbas struck out repeatedly on both counts.
Expect nothing from him ahead. He epitomizes betrayal and illegitimacy.
He represents Israel and Washington, not Palestine. He’s an unprincipled quisling head of state.
In June 2011, the Senate unanimously approved a measure to end funding if statehood is pursued.
Weeks later, the House followed suit. It voted 407 – 6.
Its resolution also called for suspending aid if Fatah/Hamas unity is consummated.
Both House and Senate resolutions are non-binding. Foreign policy is the purview of the Executive.
Exceptions include the right to declare war. Congress alone may do so.
It abdicated its authority over seven decades ago.
It shows no signs of reclaiming it.
The State of Palestine, in fact, exists. It was proclaimed in Algiers on November 15, 1988.
At the time, the PLO adopted the Palestinian Declaration of Independence.
PLO legal advisor Francis Boyle drafted it.
He included safeguards to assure all sovereign state rights.
His document left no wiggle room loopholes. He also made sure UN membership won’t comprise them.
Palestine satisfies all essential criteria for sovereign independence and full de jure UN membership.
All UN Charter states (including America and Israel) provisionally recognized Palestinian independence in accordance with UN Charter article 80(1) and League Covenant article 22(4).
Further, as the League’s successor, the General Assembly has exclusive legal authority to designate the PLO as the Palestinian peoples’ legitimate representative.
The Palestine National Council (PNC) is the PLO’s legislative body.
It’s empowered to proclaim the existence of Palestine.
According to the binding 1925 Palestine Citizenship Order in Council, Palestinians, their children and grandchildren automatically become citizens.
So are diaspora Palestinians.
Those living in Israel and Jordan have dual nationalities.
Occupied Territory residents remain “protected persons” (under Fourth Geneva) until a final peace settlement is reached.
Rights are achievable under leaders who pursue them. Palestinian governance always fell short.
Millions deserving better never got it. They remain occupied and oppressed in limbo.
They’re on their own to seek liberation PA leaders conspiratorially with Israel and Washington deny them.
On September 27, Abbas addressed the General Assembly in New York.
Once again he fell short.
His comments were watered down, weak-kneed, and duplicitous.
He’ll again seek UN non-member state status, he said.
On the one hand, he promised before and backed down.
On the other, why seek less than what’s easily within reach and should have been gotten long ago.
Last year, Francis Boyle emailed this writer as follows:
“I have advised the Palestinians to invoke the Uniting for Peace Resolution.” Doing so overrides Washington’s veto. “That get’s their Admission Application to the UN General Assembly.”
“It is the General Assembly that admits, not the Security Council. There they will need a 2/3ds vote of those states voting yes or no – abstentions, no votes, no shows do not count.”
At the time, the Financial Times estimated they had 170 votes. They constitute 88% of UN member states.
“If they get the 2/3ds vote in the General Assembly, Palestine” joins their ranks, “and you have Palestine and Israel, which everyone says they want but, of course, they do not mean it.”
Boyle added that “Palestinians will always live to fight another day. And I will be there with them until my dying day. Or until Palestine is Free.”
For the record, this writer pledges the same thing without compromising what’s right, fair, just, and long overdue.
On October 1, the London Guardian headlined “US warns European governments against supporting Palestinians at UN,” saying:
It came in private memo form. Go along or else.
Memo language said UN status in any form “would be extremely counterproductive.”
EU governments were told Palestinians will face “significant negative consequences.” Financial sanctions were mentioned.
The memo said Palestinian statehood “can only be achieved via direct negotiations with the Israelis.”
Going that route, of course, assures permanent occupation, exploitation, persecution, and failure.
European governments were urged to support US obstructionist efforts.
General Assembly representatives in New York were given Washington’s ultimatum.
Do it our way or else.
Washington and Israel have serious concerns about rights UN member states are afforded.
In another email, Boyle explained, saying:
Once Palestine “becomes a UN Member State, (it) can ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and then file a formal State to State Complaint against Israeli Officials, upgrading the lower level Complaint President Abbas filed at my advice.”
It can also “ratify the Genocide Convention and sue Israel for Genocide at the World Court, pursuant to the advice I had already given President Arafat and President Abbas, and get a temporary restraining Order against the Zionists, that would then go to the Security Council for enforcement, and if vetoed by the Americans, to the General Assembly for enforcement under the (1950) Uniting for Peace Resolution.”
“With these proceedings, (it may) be able to halt the Zionist settlement project of all Palestine in the immediate future.”
It will also lift Gaza’s siege. Abbas refuses to do it. So did Arafat before him.
Decades of Palestinian leadership failure to do the right thing constitutes betrayal.
Nothing ahead looks promising. A third Intifada is long overdue.
Courageous independent leaders are needed to inspire, organize, and direct it. Hopefully enough of them are committed and ready.
Liberation won’t come any other way.
About the Author: Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
Cop Tasers 10-Year-Old Boy For Refusing to Clean Patrol Car
Officer demonstrates what police do best on school “career day”
Posted by poorrichard’s blog
Oct 30, 2012
A state police officer in New Mexico is being sued after he allegedly tasered a child in a school playground for no reason other than he refused to clean the cop’s patrol car.
The boy’s legal guardian, Rachel Higgins, claims that Officer Chris Webb shot the boy, referred to as “R.D.”, with a 50,000 volt stun gun while visiting on a “career day” at Tularosa New Mexico Intermediate School on May 4.
The complaint notes that the officer approached a group of boys and asked which of them wanted to clean his car.
When R.D. said he had no desire to clean the patrol vehicle, Officer Webb is claimed to have stated “‘Let me show you what happens to people who do not listen to the police.’”
He then pointed his taser at the boy, according to the report, and fired two barbs directly into the 10-year old’s chest, electrifying him and causing him to blackout.
Webb then extracted the barbs from the child’s chest, leaving scarring ” that look like cigarette burns”.
“Instead of calling emergency medical personnel, Officer Webb pulled out the barbs and took the boy to the school principal’s office,” the complaint states.
The complaint claims that the boy has suffered mental trauma and night terrors and is now afraid of going to sleep at night for fear he will not wake up again.
Ms Higgins stated in Santa Fe County Court that “No reasonable officer confronting a situation where the need for force is at its lowest, on a playground with elementary age children, would have deployed the Taser in so reckless a manner as to cause physical and psychological injury.”
Higgins is suing on the grounds of battery, failure to render emergency medical care, excessive force, unreasonable seizure, and negligent hiring, training, supervision and retention.
Police guidelines on tasers state that the weapons must only be used as a last resort when an officer is under direct threat.
The idea that a 10-year old boy weighing less than 100lbs poses any form of danger to a police officer is a joke.
Numerous studies over recent years have proven that Taser stun guns can cause heart problems and even induce sudden and lethal cardiac arrest.
Webb’s alleged remark to the boy sums up the way many police officers see themselves, as grand overlords that cannot be questioned or challenged.
To these people, anyone who reacts in a way they find disagreeable is a viable target for attack, no matter if they are a child, a pregnant woman or a person with a disability.
Earlier this month, two police officers in Texas tasered a man who was having a seizure, causing the 50-year-old to suffer a heart attack and permanent brain damage.
The cops were so ill equipped to deal with the situation, that they broke out tasers and shocked a man who was already convulsing on the ground.
As we reported on Infowars Nightly news, it took paramedics 11 minutes to revive the man and bring back his pulse.
It is a miracle he is still alive, though he will now have to live with severe disabilities for the rest of his life.
It is endless amounts of these kind of incidents that show cops are not being trained to use tasers only in situations when they are threatened.
They are using the weapons on anyone who does not immediately respond to orders.
Illuminati, Nazis and the Illegal State of Israel
It’s Worse Than Anyone Thinks – Who Still Can, and Dares to
From Veterans Today
by Dean Henderson – October 30, 2012
for Veterans Today
[Editors Note: Dear Readers, We are pleased to bring you Dean's well researched material. Work like this can save the rest of us countless hours of duplicated effort which can be better spent sharing the material with others...Jim W. Dean]
If we wish to end the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, we need to know who created Israel and why.
In 1917 British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour penned a letter to Zionist Second Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild in which he expressed support for a Jewish homeland on Palestinian-controlled lands in the Middle East.
This Balfour Declaration justified the brutal seizure of Palestinian lands for the post-WWII establishment of Israel.
Israel would serve, not as some high-minded “Jewish homeland”, but as lynchpin in Rothschild/Eight Families control over the world’s oil supply.
Baron Edmond de Rothschild built the first oil pipeline from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean to bring BP Iranian oil to Israel.
He founded Israeli General Bank and Paz Oil and is considered the father of modern Israel.
The Rothschilds are the planet’s wealthiest clan, worth an estimated $100 trillion.
They control Royal Dutch/Shell, BP, Anglo-American, BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto, Bank of America and scores of other global corporations and banks.
They are the largest shareholders in the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve and most every private central bank in the world.
They needed a footprint in the Middle East to protect their new oil concessions, which they procured through Four Horsemen fronts like the Iranian Consortium, Iraqi Petroleum Company and Saudi ARAMCO.
Rothschild’s Shell and BP formed these cartels with the Rockefeller half of the Four Horsemen- Exxon Mobil and Chevron Texaco.
This new alliance required a “special relationship” between Great Britain and the US, which still exists today.
Rothschild and other wealthy European shareholders could now utilize the United States military as a Hessianized mercenary force, deployed to protect their oil interests and paid for by US taxpayers.
Israel would serve the same purpose in closer proximity to the oilfields.
The Israeli Mossad is less a national intelligence agency than it is a Rothschild/Rockefeller family security force.
The Rothschilds exert political control through the secretive Business Roundtable, which they created in 1909 with the help of Lord Alfred Milner and Cecil Rhodes- whose Rhodes Scholarship is granted by Cambridge University, out of which oil industry propagandist Cambridge Energy Research Associates operates.
Rhodes founded De Beers and Standard Chartered Bank.
The Roundtable takes its name from the legendary knight King Arthur, whose tale of the Holy Grail is synonymous with the Illuminati notion that the Eight Families possess Sangreal or holy blood- a justification for their lording over the people and resources of the planet.
According to former British Intelligence officer John Coleman, who wrote Committee of 300, “Round Tablers armed with immense wealth from gold, diamond and drug monopolies fanned out throughout the world to take control of fiscal and monetary policies and political leadership in all countries where they operated.”
Rhodes and Oppenheimer deployed to South Africa to launch the Anglo-American conglomerate.
Kuhn and Loeb were off to re-colonize America with Morgan and Rockefeller.
Rudyard Kipling was sent to India. Schiff and Warburg manhandled Russia.
Rothschild, Lazard and Israel Moses Seif pushed into the Middle East.
At Princeton, the Round Table founded the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) as partner to its All Souls College at Oxford.
IAS was funded by the Rockefeller’s General Education Board. IAS members Robert Oppenheimer, Neils Bohr and Albert Einstein created the atomic bomb.
In 1919 Rothschild’s Business Roundtable spawned the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in London.
The RIIA sponsored sister organizations around the globe, including the US Council on Foreign Relations.
The RIIA is a registered charity of the Queen and, according to its annual reports, is funded largely by the Four Horsemen.
Former British Foreign Secretary and Kissinger Associates co-founder Lord Carrington is president of both the RIIA and the Bilderbergers.
The inner circle at RIIA is dominated by Knights of St. John Jerusalem, Knights of Malta, Knights Templar and 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemasons.
The Knights of St. John were founded in 1070 and answer directly to the British House of Windsor.
Their leading bloodline is the Villiers dynasty, which the Hong Kong Matheson family- owners of the HSBC opium laundry- married into.
The Lytton family also married into the Villiers gang.
Colonel Edward Bulwer-Lytton led the English Rosicrucian secret society, which Shakespeare opaquely referred to as Rosencranz, while the Freemasons were symbolized by Guildenstern.
Lytton was spiritual father of both the RIIA and Nazi fascism.
In 1871 he penned a novel titled, Vril: The Power of the Coming Race. Seventy years later the Vril Society received ample mention in Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
Lytton’s son became Viceroy to India in 1876 just before opium production spiked in that country.
His good friend Rudyard Kipling introduced the swastika to India and later worked under Lord Beaverbrook as Propaganda Minister, alongside Sir Charles Hambro of the Hambros banking dynasty.
Children of the Roundtable elite are members of a Dionysian cult known as Children of the Sun.
Initiates include Aldous Huxley, T. S. Eliot, D. H. Lawrence and H. G. Wells.
Wells headed British intelligence during WWI.
His books speak of a “one-world brain” and “a police of the mind”.
William Butler Yeats, another Sun member, was a pal of Aleister Crowley.
The two formed an Isis Cult based on a Madam Blavatsky manuscript, which called on the British aristocracy to organize itself into an Aryan priesthood.
Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society and Bulwer-Lytton’s Rosicrucians joined forces to form the Thule Society, out of which the Nazis emerged.
Rothschild, Rockefeller and the rest of the Illuminati bankers backed the Nazis.
Max and Paul Warburg sat on I. G. Farben’s board, as did H. A. Metz, who was director at the Warburg Bank of Manhattan- later Chase Manhattan.
Bank of Manhattan director and Federal Reserve Board member C. E. Mitchell sat on the board of I. G. Farben’s US branch.
In 1936 Avery Rockefeller set up a combination with the German Schroeder family, who served as Hitler’s personal bankers.
Time magazine called the new Schroeder, Rockefeller & Company “the economic booster of the Rome-Berlin Axis”.
Morgan Guaranty Trust and Union Banking Corporation (UBC) also funded the Nazis.
UBC board member Prescott Bush is W’s grandfather.
In 1933 at the home of banker Baron Kurt von Schroeder, a deal was cut to bring Hitler to power.
Attending the meeting were brothers John Foster and Allen Dulles- Rockefeller cousins and partners at law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, which represented Schroeder Bank.
Schroeder, managing director T. C. Tiarks, was a director at the Rothschild-controlled Bank of England.
In the spring of 1934 Bank of England Chairman Montagu Norman convened a meeting of London bankers who decided to covertly fund Hitler.
Royal Dutch/Shell Chairman Sir Henri Deterding helped in this effort.
Even after the US went to war with Germany, Exxon Chairman Walter Teagle remained on the board of I. G. Chemical- the US I. G. Farben subsidiary.
Exxon was integral in supplying the Nazis with tetraethyl lead, an important component of aviation fuel.
Only Exxon, Du Pont and GM made the stuff.
Teagle also supplied the Japanese with his product.
Exxon and I. G. Farben were such close business associates that by 1942 Thurman Arnold – head of the US Justice Department’s Anti-Trust Division- produced documents that showed, “Standard and Farben in Germany had literally carved up the world markets, with oil and chemical monopolies established all over the map.”
In 1912 railroad magnate Edward Harriman’s widow joined John D. Rockefeller in funding a eugenics research lab at Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
That same year the First International Congress of Eugenics was convened in London with Winston Churchill presiding.
In 1932 the conference was held in New York. Hamburg-Amerika Shipping Line, owned by George Walker and Prescott Bush, brought the German contingent to the gene-fest.
One member of the German delegation was Dr. Ernst Rudin of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy in Berlin.
He was unanimously elected president for his work in founding the German Society of Race Hygiene- a forerunner to Hitler’s race institutes.
As of 1998 there were still scores of lawsuits pending against Ford, Chase Manhattan, J.P. Morgan, Deutsche Bank, Allianz AG and several Swiss banks for their dealings with the Nazis.
At the heart of Hitler’s inner circle were the secret societies Germanordern (brothers of Yale’s Skull & Bones), the Thule Society, and Vril.
The concepts “Great Masters”, “Adepts” and the “Great White Brotherhood”, which the Nazis used to justify their idea of Aryan superiority, were ancient ideas carried forth from the Egyptian Mystery Schools by the Teutonic Knights, the Illuminati, and Hebrew Cabalists.
These same concepts can be found in today’s New Age Movement, whose New Age magazine was first published by the Grand Orient Masonic Lodge of Washington, DC. Henry Kissinger was an early supporter.
Nazi occultists believed ancient German tribes were the true keepers of the Ancient Mysteries which had their origin in Atlantis, when seven races of God-men were introduced to Earth.
Thule was a Teutonic Atlantis believed by the Nazis to house these long-vanquished races, who lost their godly Annunaki powers by interbreeding with humans.
At the inner core of the Thule Society were Satanists who practiced black magic.
Hitler was once described as a “child of Illuminism”.
According to Dr. Walter Langer, who did a war-time psychoanalysis of Hitler for the CIA-predecessor OSS, Hitler was also a Rothschild.
Langer uncovered an Austrian police report proving Hitler’s father was an illegitimate son of a peasant cook named Maria Anna Schicklgruber, who at the time of her conception was a servant in the Vienna home of Baron Rothschild.
In May 1941 Rudolf Hess parachuted into the estate of the Duke of Hamilton, saying a supernatural force told him to negotiate with the British.
Hitler was ostensibly visited by this same apparition and suddenly turned vehemently against occultism.
He ordered a crackdown against Freemasons, Templars and the Theosophical Society.
Suddenly the international banker crowd pulled the plug on Hitler’s finances and began to denounce him.
Six months later the Hessianized US military entered WWII.
Hitler’s fate was no different than that of Saddam Hussein or Manuel Noriega.
The Illuminati bankers’ modus operandi is to use men of low integrity to do their dirty work, before conveniently discarding and distancing themselves from them.
The horrific Holocaust that ensued assured sympathy for the already-planned state of Israel.
Towards the end of WWII, the murderous Haganah and Stern Gangs were deployed by the Rothschild bankers to terrorize Palestinians and steal their land.
Jews who escaped Hitler’s gas chambers were those of means who bought into Zionism.
For a fee of $1,000 – lots of money at that time – these right-wingers bought passage to Israel and escaped the fate of the poor Jews, Serbs, communists and gypsies.
The whole bloody affair was a massive eugenics project. It had more to do with culling the herd along class lines, than it did with ethnicity or religion.
The key to this historic puzzle is to understand that the Rothschild/Rockefeller sangreal international bankers supported both the rise of the Nazis and the creation of Israel.
None of this has anything to do with religion.
It has everything to do with oil, arms, drugs, money and power.
The Rothschilds say they are Jewish. The Rockefellers claim to be Christian. These are irrelevant smokescreens.
Any demagogue- who blames injustice a religion or race of people- is sadly misinformed.
Throughout history the Illuminati Satanists have sacrificed people of all race and religion to further their agenda of total planetary control.
Israel is not a “Jewish homeland”. It is an oil monopoly lynchpin.
Its citizens are being put in harms way- used by the Four Horsemen and their Eight Families-owners as geopolitical pawns in an international resource grab.
No peaceful solution is possible until the stolen land is returned to its rightful Palestinian owners.
Israel is an illegal entity. Viva Palestine!
Dean Henderson is the author of four books: Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network, The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries, Das Kartell der Federal Reserve & Stickin’ it to the Matrix.
You can subscribe free to his weekly Left Hook column @ www.deanhenderson.wordpress.com
Editing: Jim W. Dean
Related Posts :
Who Killed Lucia and Leo Krim?
From the Trenches World Report
Posted on October 31, 2012 by Admin
On 10/25/2012 two corporate financial media bastions, MarketWatch (an affiliate of the Wall Street Journal) and CNBC, presented their readers with a bombshell.
In a too-good-to-be-true lawsuit, the top echelons of the USA’s banking and civilian government had been sued for “racketeering and money laundering.”
The suit requested “the return of $43 trillion to the United States Treasury.”
Yes, you’ve read that right: 43 trillion—roughly 3 years worth of America’s GDP or 3 times America’s underestimate of its own national debt.
The suit characterizes itself, according to these two corporate media tabloids, as
the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History.
[It identifies] $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the ‘Banksters’ and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers.
[And it] pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the ‘Banksters’ located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.
The plaintiff has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000) by the “Banksters” and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the “bailout programs” by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky,
former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other ‘bailout money’ advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants.
This District Court Complaint—maintained by Spire Law Group, LLP—is the only lawsuit in the world listing as Defendants the Banksters, let alone serving all of such Banksters with legal process and therefore forcing them to finally answer the charges in court.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, nor the Office of the Attorney General, nor any State Attorney General has sued the Banksters and thereby legally chased them worldwide to recover-back the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) and other lawful damages, injunctive relief and other legal remedies.
Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the ‘Banksters’ criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama’s campaign from these same ‘Banksters’ to finance its political aspirations,
the national group of plaintiffs homeowners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the ‘Bankster’ Defendants.
The complaint—which has now been fully served on thousands of the ‘Banksters and their Co-Conspirators’—makes it irrefutable that the epicenter of this laundering and racketeering enterprise has been and continues to be Wall Street and continues to involve the very ‘Banksters’ located there who have repeatedly asked in the past to be ‘bailed out’ and to be ‘bailed out’ in the future.
It is now beyond dispute that, while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan modifications for homeowners by ‘Banksters’, it was privately ratifying the formation of these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State and Federal law.
The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank,
and numerous other federally chartered banks stole trillions of dollars of homeowners’ and taxpayers’ money during the last decade and then laundered it through offshore companies.
To begin with, it must be made absolutely clear that, unless this lawsuit enjoys the backing of the military component of our ruling Military/Banking Dyad, this lawsuit is a quixotic consciousness-raising exercise which has absolutely no chance of success.
Most judges in this land have already been bought.
If you need any proof, ask yourself: How is it that the highest court in the land, charged with protecting the Constitution, stands aside and looks while this very Constitution is being dismantled?
Why does that said court not only allow rigged elections, but lends its full support to the riggers?
Why does it not only stand aside and look while sunshine bribery (aka “campaign contributions”) corrupts every square inch of the republic, but actually seeks ways and means to further enshrine, institutionalize, and metastasize this bribery?
But, you might say, what about the many well-meaning men and women who still hold office in America’s “justice” system?
The answer is simple.
Would you, in their shoes, willingly let go of any chance of promotion for the sake of fighting a losing battle?
Would you risk your name being dragged in the mud, your wife harassed or murdered, or your own body ending up in a dump?
Am I going too far in thinking that American judges do indeed face such dilemmas?
No, for I am simply portraying the real undercurrents of politics, Washington style.
Let me cite two U.S. presidents in support of this seemingly cynical view.
First, James Madison, two centuries ago:
“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.”
Next, Woodrow Wilson, a century ago:
Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately.
Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something.
They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
You might still argue that all this is history and doesn’t apply to today’s world.
Well, let me give you a more contemporary quote, this time from Catherine Austin-Fitts, Assistant Secretary of Housing in the George H. W. Bush’s Administration.
I think at the heart of the matter, Max, is not that the banks are out of control; I think the heart of the matter is physical violence, because a lot of what has happened,
particularly as I understand in the United States is you have people who are afraid to say no because the results of saying no is physical violence directed at them or their family.
I mean we have had a lot of people murdered or assassinated, etc., etc.
So the question is yes we have to say no but the question is how do we say no.
And that’s why it comes down to shifting our money, but the reality is we have a force operating in the world, that is completely operating outside of the law and no one yet has come up with a way to stop it.
We are talking about violent mobster operations.
I hate to use a personal example, but I was a former Assistant Secretary of Housing, I had my own business in Washington, and I was helping the Department of Housing and Urban Development, essentially run things clean,
and you had to get rid of the clean team to run the housing bubble and I was targeted, I was poisoned, I had dead animals left on my doorstep, and my home had been broken into, and people [had been] trying to run me off the road.
You know it was very, very violent and it went on for years.
So people who try to run the government clean or run Wall Street clean are targeted, and literally have to fear for their lives.
I mean, people have been dying, so you know, it’s a very, very dangerous situation and the challenge is, if you have people who can kill and physically harass with impunity, how do you run a governance process?
So, unless our rulers (bankers and generals) are at war with each other and this lawsuit is a result of such internecine warfare, the lawsuit has no prospects of success.
(We may note in passing that such warfare, if it is taking place, would throw light on the fact that the $43T lawsuit has not been glossed over by 2 organs of the corporate media).
It would also explain the ongoing Lagarde List Affair, which has so far led to two deaths and which lists 22,000 names of wealthy tax evaders from various EU member states who hold Swiss bank accounts (see also this).
Nonetheless, the $43T lawsuit draws attention to the realities of American politics.
It exposes the most profitable thieving operation in the history of our species.
It tells every American smart enough to punch numbers in a calculator that, one way or the other, her household has been so far cheated of $377,000.
It tells us that the US government is, in reality, a criminal operation.
It tells the few American people who are still awake that if this rapidly-metastasizing cancer of corruption cannot be peacefully removed from our body politic, and soon, that it will have to be forcefully removed—the future of the republic is clearly at stake.
Above all, as in the parallel case of the Lagarde List Affair, it discloses the identities of some implacable enemies of humanity and thereby places these enemies at a grave personal risk.
So, although the lawsuit will be summarily dismissed, or, in a best-case scenario, thrown out on appeal, it does create a major headache for the bankers and their political lackeys.
These criminals can ill afford such exposure, such exceptional chutzpah, and such attempts to deprive them of their ill-gotten money.
Indeed, if history is any guide, such audacity never goes unpunished.
In minor infractions against the “banksters” (the term employed by the plaintiffs), the banksters and their government lapdogs are typically patient, willing to curb their blood lust for a few weeks, months, or years, before exacting their deadly retribution.
But in treachery of this magnitude, punishment is always swift.
Among the 1000s of examples that could be cited for this iron-clad rule, consider the case of prisoner number 40892-424: former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich.
Rod Blagojevich threatened to stop the state’s dealings with Bank of America Corp. over a shut-down factory in Chicago.
On December 8, 2008 (the day before his arrest), all state agencies were ordered to stop conducting business with Bank of America to pressure the company to make the loans.
Blagojevich said the biggest U.S. retail bank would not get any more state business unless it restored credit to Republic Windows and Doors, whose workers were staging a sit-in.
John Douglas, a former general counsel for the FDIC and attorney for Bank of America, called Blagojevich’s gambit dangerous.
A day after this popular state governor stood by the people against the parasites, the federal Gestapo arrested him–for doing what just about every politician in our Sodom and Gomorrah does every day.
According to another outlet of the global corporate media:
Disgraced Illinois governor [was] handed [a] stiff sentence for attempting to sell President Obama’s vacant Senate seat [and] was sentenced to 14 years in prison Wednesday, one of the stiffest penalties imposed for corruption.
It took two trials for prosecutors to snare Blagojevich.
While Blagojevich will likely end up at a minimal security prison, he’ll be largely cut off from the outside world.
Visits by family are strictly limited, Blagojevich will have to share a cell with other inmates and he must work an eight-hour-a-day menial job—possibly scrubbing toilets or mopping floors—at just 12 cents an hour.
We’re ready to return to our lawsuit.
Obviously, the plaintiffs in the $43,000,000,000,000 case are at the gravest possible risk.
But killing the heroic attorneys of Spire (the law group filing the charges) or their family members would be too obvious right now, even for people possessing a license to kill.
Besides, Fiedler (the attorney who signed the filing) and his associates are not the main culprit, from the bankers’ perspective.
American history is chock-full of obscure dissidents who died of old age.
The worst offenders are the corporate media outlets which, because of oversight, or idealism, or naiveté, or internecine warfare, broke every corporate media rule and gave this story national exposure.
This error or deliberate affront required a fast and furious shock and awe.
And this, in turn, brings us back to the blood-curdling murder of little Lucia and Leo Krim.
It turns out that these toddlers’ father, Kevin Krim, is chief executive of CNBC Digital.
Lucia and Leo were stabbed to death hours after the article covering the $43T suit appeared at the CNBC website.
The knifing could be seen as a graphic and chilling warning to all mass media outlets, reminding them that Madison, Wilson, and Austin-Fitts really knew how the system works.
The bloody warning had not been lost on CNBC, which immediately after the slaying of Lucia and Leo removed the article from their website.
They must have been in a hurry when they first took the article down, for some accompanying comments could still be read for some time, before they too were removed.
As of this writing (Sunday evening, 10/28/2012), one can still read about this lawsuit at the MarketWatch site, but, one suspects, not for long.
Bankers’ involvement in the murder of the Krim toddlers is plausible enough, but can if be proven?
The answer is yes and no.
Remember, if the grim view presented here reflects reality, we’re dealing with the best-trained assassins in the world, psychopathic professionals who are not likely to incriminate themselves or their masters.
Remember too that the men who order such assassinations possess a license to kill.
At least as far back as the Civil War, they have always been getting away with the murders of our best and brightest while we stood aside and looked (to paraphrase the late Bob Marley).
So although we can’t be absolutely sure that the invisible government butchered Lucia and Leo, we can say that such butchery fits a historical pattern of state executions, and therefore that this pattern probably applies to these children as well.
Given this pattern, given my background as a natural scientist and a frequent traveler to the land of statistical levels of significance, I’d place that the probability that the execution of Lucia and Leo was an act of state at about 90% (assuming of course that the basic facts in our possession are accurate and that this lawsuit and murders are not a COINTELPRO smokescreen.)
That is, a priori, and without any detailed detective work, I feel there is roughly a 9 in 10 chance that Lucia and Leo have been murdered by rogue elements of the United States government.
Finally, we may wish to look at the specifics of this tragedy, and see if they are consistent with our forensic interpretation.
If so, they may raise the probability estimate to about 95%—the level which conventionally allows scientists to provisionally accept their hypotheses.
As we shall see now, although it’s too early to offer a conclusive answer, we can definitely conclude the following: the facts given to us so far by the men in the shadows are far more consistent with the hypothesis proposed here than with the hypothesis that these men themselves provide.
As we have seen, Lucia Krim, aged 6, and her brother Leo, aged 2, died from multiple stab wounds.
Their mutilated bodies were found in the bathtub of their home, “with their nanny unconscious on the bathroom floor and holding a bloody Knife.”
Lucia and Leo’s parents were on the best possible terms with the children’s caregiver, Yoselyn Ortega, treated her well, and spent a few days recently visiting her family in the Dominican Republic.
Ms. Ortega doted on her charges.
Background checks gave every appearance of an ordinary, hard-working, decent person.
According to the New York Times, “Ms. Ortega had talked about how happy she was with her work life… She loved her job with the Krims… was paid well and treated well. She also said she was so fond of Ms. Krim that she often put in extra hours to help her.”
As usual in such contrived cases, the CIA organ of record, along with its mendacious sisters have already solved the mystery:
Their question is not “Who killed Lucia and Leo Krim?”
Instead they ask: “Exactly what prompted [the nanny] to attack the children — children who, by her friends’ accounts, she was devoted to?”
Haven’t these “journalists” read Conan Doyle?
Did they skip each and every one of their Logic 101 class?
Don’t they know that, when it comes to criminal investigations, appearances are meant to deceive?
Their strange ignorance can be best ascribed to a directive from above, a directive “suggesting” that they resort to one of demagoguery’s ancient hat tricks: the complex question (the classical example being a prosecutor asking an innocent defendant: “Did you murder your husband with a hatchet or a cleaver?”)
One would want, at the very least, to get Yoselyn Ortega’s version of the events before accusing her of such a heinous crime.
Again, as you might expect in license-to-kill incidents, detectives have been “unable to question Ms. Ortega, who was in a medically-induced coma in a hospital.”
The tabloid of record does not bother to explain why a coma had to be induced.
And again, as happens so often in state executions, the police retracted their first version of events, claiming later that Mrs. Ortega was “conscious and intubated.”
Either way, poor Yoselyn can’t speak for the time being and tell the world what really happened.
It is, in fact, doubtful that she will ever speak again.
Seasoned observers of government-sanctioned slayings may hazard two guesses.
The first begins with the contingency, hinted at by the New York Tabolid, that Ms. Ortega might have visited a psychologist just before the murders.
If so, she might have been programmed to commit the murders of the two children she loved (recall that the CIA mastered such programming technologies already in the 1950s please consult this example).
The problem with this scenario is time—I simply don’t know whether walking zombies can be created in a few hours.
If she did indeed see a psychologist, a genuine detective would have begun by immediately questioning that psychologist and ruling out any connection to the CIA, FBI, and other government agencies.
The second, likelier, contingency, is that Ms. Ortega had been attacked by the same person(s) who murdered the two children and that the attacker(s) proceeded to place the knife in her hand.
This would explain the chilling brutality of the case and its bizarreness, for both serve the goal of frightening and subduing would-be dissidents and whistle-blowers.
If this version is correct, Yoselyn Ortega’s survival so far is a miracle and there is every reason to believe that she would not emerge out of that hospital alive or with her faculties intact.
Indeed, given the obvious and present danger she is in, in a better world vigilantes would have taken it upon themselves to save her life by clandestinely removing her to a secret and safe shelter, treating her in a manner that would restore her health and psychological well-being, guard her life around the clock, videotape her version of the events, and post this version as soon as possible.
Only such action, it may turn out, might have saved the life of this innocent bystander and expose the masterminds of a vicious, high-stakes, murder plot.
Dr. Moti Nissani is a professor emeritus, Department of Biology, Wayne State University.
His newest work in progress is available here: A Revolutionary’s Toolkit. Read other articles by Moti, or visit Moti’s website.
Has the Election already been Stolen for Romney/Ryan?
By Larry Chin
Global Research, October 30, 2012
For at least the past four decades, the American election process has been controlled by corporations and agents connected to the Republican Party.
This year’s “contest” is no different.
Voter suppression campaigns have been underway across America, by Republican operatives.
(See Black Box Voting and Brad Blog). Nothing is being done to stop it.
Mitt Romney has direct ties to voting machines (also see the report by Brad Freeman).
His son, Tagg Romney (who wanted to punch Barack Obama in the face) and a cadre of former Bain Capital business partners are owners of Hart Intercivic, whose voting machines are used in all fifty states.
And this is just one of the many companies with ties to the right-wing, which include Diebold, ES&S, and Sequoia.
In 2004, Diebold’s Walden O’Dell promised to “deliver votes” to George W. Bush.
His machines did, stealing what should have been a John Kerry win.
To this day, American democracy remains privatized and hackable.
Nothing has been done about it.
Theft continues unabated.
Backlash and cover-up
The few investigators who keep bringing exhaustive factual evidence of vote fraud to light have been attacked as “conspiracy theorists” by corporate media gatekeepers, and ignored by officials.
These same accusers have refused to lift a finger to verify any of the facts.
The “progressive” establishment Left has joined in this cover-up.
The Democratic Party-affiliated Center for American Progress, and its site ThinkProgress, recently attacked reporter Brad Freedman, for raising questions about Romney’s ties to voting machines.
Why is the establishment Left dissuading their own constituents from waking up?
Going back to the days of COINTELPRO and Operation Mockingbird, the Left gate keeping apparatus has long operated as a system of controlled dissent, offering channels to express certain ideas, but smashing down factual truths that are deemed truly threatening to their agenda.
The notion that American democracy—the vote—is thoroughly corrupted is such a threat.
Unfortunately, it is the fact.
Nevertheless, we find the liberal consensus still pushing illusions and naïve ideas.
Obama is still portrayed as a populist hero, despite his Bush/Cheney-esque record.
The Democrats continue to urge their followers to believe that turnout and early voting solve everything.
But what if those votes are not counted?
If the machines counting the votes are controlled by Republicans and Romney/Ryan, the game may already be over.
With a few clicks of a keyboard of a Hart Intercivic machine (Tagg Romney could even do it himself), the White House is seized, just as it was in 2000 and 2004.
Romney/Ryan: As Teflon as Bush/Cheney
Simultaneous with a vote-rigging apparatus in place for the Republicans, the corporate media—dominated by the corporate right-wing— has gone out of its way to give Romney and Ryan a free pass in news coverage.
Corporate media is ignoring their unsavory backgrounds, and ignoring the clear dangers of their policy agenda, and also ignoring the neocon fanatics advising the campaign.
Tax returns that contain the history of his dirty schemes at Bain Capital are not the focus of critical investigation.
Countless Romney/Ryan campaign blunders, embarrassing debate losses and pathological lying have not slowed down their momentum.
Many polls continue to put Romney in the lead. Some polls even put Romney ahead of Obama among women, despite his outrageous misogyny. It is impossible to believe that these numbers correlate with realities on the ground.
Clearly the illusion of a close election is being created, in order to provide political cover for vote theft on November 6th.
As demonstrated in 2000, close elections are easier to steal.
Bush/Cheney on steroids
The parallels with the stolen election of 2000 that installed Bush/Cheney in the White House are clear, and palpable. The larger political situation is also eerily similar.
Coming off of a period of neoliberal place-holding under Clinton, it was time to hand the controls over to Washington’s most hawkish right-wing enforcers, in order to start the war for oil (9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq) in earnest.
A Romney/Ryan administration will deliver a return to neoconservative rule—this time for the wars in Iran and Syria, and to impose austerity programs domestically—with militant messianic fervor.
The arrogant and malleable Mitt Romney, a suit as empty as George W. Bush, is the perfect man for the job. Ryan, a peevish and sadistic ideologue is also an ideal “enforcer”.
If Romney/Ryan wind up winning the election, the world would be subjected to Bush/Cheney on steroids, with an extra element of fanaticism from the messianic Romney, and Ryan, the right-wing Christian extremist.
Its team of foreign policy advisers is a wall to wall cast of Bush/Cheney henchmen:
Dan Senor- former leader of the Iraq provisional authority
Cofer Black-former CIA official, vice chairman of Blackwater USA
John Bolton- former Bush/Cheney US ambassador
Eliot Cohen- Project for New American Century (PNAC), Dick Cheney aide
Walid Phares- “scholar” on “anti-terrorism”; Lebanese Christian with ties to violent Lebanese militia
Michael Hayden- Bush/Cheney CIA and NSA director
Max Boot- senior CFR fellow, PNAC
Eric Edelman- former Dick Cheney aide
The ticket’s economic advisers are led by the Paul Ryan himself, along with the following leftovers from Bush/Cheney:
Glenn Hubbard- Bush/Cheney council of economic advisors
Gregory Mankiw- Bush/Cheney council of economic advisors
Vin Weber- lobbyist, former Republican member of Congress
Jim Talent- lobbyist connected to Jack Abramoff
Kevin Hassett- former aide to Bush/Cheney
Finally, the list of neocon extremists being considered for a Romney/Ryan cabinet promises unmitigated war and destruction.
Attempted right-wing coup
It must also be noted that in 2008, the right-wing corporate elements—spearheaded by Bush/Cheney—triggered the financial collapse, at least in part to saddle the incoming Obama administration with problems that virtually ensured the present-day no-win political situation for Obama.
Taking cues from the likes of the malodorous Mitch McConnell, the American right-wing has sabotaged the Obama administration from the minute Obama took the oath.
Anything to get the “Kenyan communist black” out of the White House.
The behavior of Republicans and the Romney/Ryan camp in the wake of the 9/11/12 attack on the American embassy in Libya remains highly suspicious.
Salon reported high-level Republicans gloating and “chortling” by high ranking Republicans that the attacks have turned Obama “into Jimmy Carter”. See: GOP’s October Surprise.
Regardless of how devotedly the Obama administration has faithfully and seamlessly continued and expanded the Bush/Cheney corporate and war agenda, the American neocons have done everything possible to keep Obama’s “leash” very short to begin with.
Now they are yanking on it.
Romney: anointed by the elites?
The other sign suggesting a possible Romney victory is Romney’s attendance at the June 2012 Bilderberg conference. All previous US presidents who attended Bilderberg meetings were eventually anointed president shortly thereafter.
According to some Bilderberg watchers, Obama may have worn out his welcome.
It is also no coincidence that in his foreign policy speeches on the campaign trail, Romney proclaimed Russia to be the number one threat to the West.
Like a good boot licker, Romney has merely parroted the top concern of the Bilderbergers, as reported by investigator Daniel Estulin.
To the Bilderberg cabal, Russia is the key adversary and central obstacle to the US/NATO agenda in all of the world’s hot spots.
Romney’s inflammatory China-baiting is another nod to a top Bilderberg priority.
The Bilderberg elites know, of course, that the “war on terrorism” is a lie, that the wars in Central Asia, the Middle East are manufactured conflicts, and intermediate steps in the sequential “Great Game”.
The long-term war for dominance of the planet, as seen by the elites, is between NATO and West, versus Russia and China, over oil and gas, a collapsing world economic system that is dependent on oil.
The Obama camp may be ridiculing Romney for his seemingly off base rhetoric, but by currying favor with the Bilderberger cabal, the obsequious Romney may have the last laugh.
Romney, a vicious sociopath who has reaped mega-profits from bankrupting and destroying companies and inflicting suffering, may indeed be “presidential” for what the elites have in mind.
Bush and Cheney were not hired to rationally run a government, but to oversee a criminal organization.
Romney, Ryan and their neocons are ideal for sadistic gangster rule.
Hurricane Sandy benefits Romney/Ryan
Hurricane Sandy is blasting the eastern quarter of the United States, shutting down entire regions.
If power is not fully restored to the affected states by November 6th, the election will be thrown into doubt.
Any election result could be challenged.
In this nightmare scenario, the election could be decided, as it was in 2000, by the Supreme Court, which criminally installed Bush/Cheney to power.
A Romney/Ryan victory would be assured.
A new era of terror
It remains to be seen whether the worst-case scenario suggested by this piece will take place.
However, every human being must nevertheless prepare for the trouble that will come after November 6, 2012, whether the White House occupant will be Obama or Romney/Ryan.
Aspreviously written, humanity loses, no matter who “wins”.
But if a spectacular Romney/Ryan criminal event manages to steal the election, a special alarm must be sounded.
It would signal the start of a new phase of unprecedented imperial criminality and violence.