DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

DaniMartExtras, Too

Posted by Xaniel777 on October 26, 2011

MAIN STREAM MEDIA’S NATURAL BORN NEMESIS

“EVERY RACE, EVERY TRIBE, ONE AMERICA!”

 FIND A MILITIA NEAR YOU AT : WELL REGULATED AMERICAN MILITIAS !

 WRAM – WE DEDICATE OUR HEARTS,MINDS AND BODIES TO PROTECTING OUR GREAT REPUBLIC!

DON’T FORGET TO CHECK OUT OUR ENLIGHTENMENT BLOG AT Tetra-Trinity Chronicles

AND OUR OTHER ENLIGHTENMENT BLOG AT REALITY SHIFTS

Rachel Corrie American Hero 1

 

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

Reality Shift: Beginning of the End and the Reset Begins

Posted by Xaniel777 on December 1, 2015

Judge Anna Update – “Dear Federal Agents” – November 28, 2015

SOURCE:  Ascension With Mother Earth

https://i2.wp.com/www.annavonreitz.com/anna210.jpg

Anna Maria Riezinger  (Anna Von Reitz)

                                                                                                        

November 28, 2015
Big Lake, Alaska

Dear Federal Agents:

I am addressing this letter in this way, because it is my understanding that it will be read by members of both the FBI and the US Marshals Service. It is also my understanding that you have available for examination a wet-ink signed copy of the illustrated affidavit of probable cause entitled “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” as back-up reference and evidence.

Since the publication of the affidavit a plethora of new supporting documentation and
evidence has come to light. We found, for example, that on June 30, 1864, the members of
Congress acting as the Board of Directors of a private, mostly foreign-owned corporation
doing business as “The United States of America, Incorporated” changed the meaning of
“state”, “State” and “United States” to mean “District of Columbia Municipal Corporation”.
Like the 1862 change of the meaning of the word “person” to mean “corporation” cited in
our affidavit, these special coded meanings of words render a drastically different picture of
the world around us.

It turns out that your “personal bank account” is actually a “corporate bank account”. The
“Colorado State Court” is actually the “Colorado District of Columbia Municipal Corporation
Court”.

If you are shocked to learn these facts, you are not alone. So are millions of other
Americans. These changes were made 150 years ago and tucked away in reams of boring
meeting minutes and legalistic gobbledygook meant to be applied only to the internal
workings of a private governmental services corporation and its employees.

There was no public announcement, just as there was no public announcement or
explanation when Congress created “municipal citizenship” known as “US citizenship” in
1868. Properly, technically, even to this day, this form of “citizenship” applies only to those
born in the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and other Insular States, so there was
no real reason to educate the general public about the topic. As Congress was secretively
using the labor and the private property assets of these “citizens” as collateral backing the
corporate debts of “The United States of America, Inc.” there was plenty of reason to
obscure this development. At the end of the Civil War it would have been very unpopular to
reveal that they were simply changing gears from private sector slave ownership to public
sector slave ownership.

You may be surprised to learn that slavery was not abolished by the Thirteenth or any other
Amendment to any constitution then or now. Instead, slavery was redefined as the
punishment meted out to criminals. Look it up and read it for yourselves. It remains
perfectly legal to enslave criminals, and it was left to Congress to define who the criminals
were, because Congress was given plenary power over the District of Columbia and its
citizenry by the original Constitution of the Republic and could do whatever it liked within
the District and the Washington, DC Municipalities.

A child picking dandelions on the sidewalk could be arbitrarily defined as a criminal and
enslaved for life by the renegade Congress functioning as the government of the District of
Columbia and as the Board of Directors for the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation,
but for starters, Congress simply defined “US citizens” as debt slaves under the 14th Amendment of their corporation’s articles and by-laws—-which they deceptively named the “Constitution of the United States of America”.

The actual Constitution was and still is called “The Constitution for the united States of
America”, but most people untrained in the Law and trusting what they believed to be their
government didn’t notice the difference between “The Constitution for the united States of
America” and the “Constitution of the United States of America”.

Are you beginning to see a pattern of deliberate deceit and self-interest and double-speak
and double-dealing? And are you also beginning to catch the drift—the motivation—behind
it?
Let’s discuss the concept of “hypothecation of debt”. This little gem was developed by the
bankers who actually owned and ran the governmental services corporations doing business
as “The United States of America, Inc.” and as the “United States, Incorporated”.

When you hypothecate debt against someone or against some asset belonging to someone
else, you simply claim that they agreed to stand as surety for your debt — similar to co-
signing a car loan — and as long as you make your payments, nobody is any the wiser.

Normally, it’s not possible for us to just arbitrarily claim that someone is our surety for debt
without proof of consent, but that is exactly what Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the
Conference of Governors did in March of 1933. They named all of us and all our property as
surety standing good for the debts of their own bankrupt governmental services corporation
during bankruptcy reorganization—-and got away with it by claiming that they were our
“representatives” and that we had delegated our authority to them to do this “for” us.

The exact date and occasion when this happened and where it is recorded, is given in our
affidavit.

In order to pull this off, however, they had to allege that we were all “US citizens”, and
therefore, all subject to the plenary power of Congress acting as an oligarchy ruling over the
District of Columbia and the Federal Territories. They did this by abusing the public trust
and creating and registering millions of foreign situs trusts named after each of us. Under
their own diversity of citizenship rules, corporations are considered to be “US citizens”. So
they created all these foreign situs trusts as franchises of their own bankrupt corporation,
used our names styled like this: John Quincy Adams—-and placed commercial liens against
our names as chattel owned by their corporation and standing as surety for its debts.

A group of thugs elected to political office grossly transgressed against the American people
and the American states and committed the crime of personage against each and every one
of us without us ever being aware of it.

They couldn’t enslave us, but they could enslave a foreign situs trust named after us— that we conveniently didn’t know existed— and by deliberately confusing this “thing” with us via
the misuse of our given names, they could bring charges against what appeared to be us
and our private property in their very own corporate tribunals.

And so the fleecing of America began in earnest. The hirelings had our credit cards, had
stolen our identities, and were ready to begin a crime spree unheralded in human history.

They claimed that we all knew about this arrangement and consented to it, because we
“voluntarily” gave up our gold when FDR sent his henchmen around to collect it—-when as
millions of Americans can attest, people gave up their gold in preference to being shot or
having to kill federal agents. They chose life for everyone concerned over some pieces of
metal, and for that, they are to be honored; unfortunately, their decision gave the rats
responsible an excuse to claim that Americans wanted to leave the gold standard and
wanted the “benefits” of this New Deal in “equitable exchange” for their gold, their
identities, the abuse of their good names as bankrupts and debtors, the loss of allodial title
to their land and homes, and their subjection as slaves to the whims of Congress.

According to them—that is, those who benefited from this gross betrayal of the public
trust— we all voluntarily left the Republic and the guarantees of the actual Constitution
behind, willingly subjected ourselves to Congressional rule, donated all our assets including
our labor and property to the Public Charitable Trust (set up after the Civil War as a welfare
trust for displaced plantation slaves), and agreed to live as slaves owned by the District of
Columbia Municipal Corporation in exchange for what?

Welfare that we paid for ourselves. Social Security that we paid for ourselves.
The criminality of the “US Congress” and the “Presidents” acting since 1933 is jaw-
droppingly shocking. Their abuse of the trust of the American people is even worse.
They have portrayed this circumstance as a political choice instead of an institutionalized
fraud scheme, and they have “presumed” that we all went along with it and agreed to it
without complaint. Thus, they have been merrily and secretively having us declared “civilly
dead” as American State Citizens the day we are born, and entering a false registration
claiming that we are “US Citizens” instead.

We are told, when we wake up enough to ask, that we are free to choose our political
status. We don’t have to serve as debt slaves. We can go back and reclaim our guaranteed
Republican form of government and our birthright status if we want to—- but that requires
a secret process in front of the probate court and expatriation from the Federal United
States to the Continental United States and all sorts of voo-doo in backrooms that can only
be pursued by the few and the knowledgeable and the blessed. Everyone else has to remain
as a debt slave and chattel serving whatever corporation bought the latest version of
corporate “persona” named after us.

So let me ask you, as members of the FBI and as US Marshals—- does this sound like
something you want to be involved with enforcing on innocent people, or does it sound like
something you want to end as expeditiously as possible?

The frauds that took root in the wake of the Civil War and which blossomed in the 1930’s
have come to their final fruition. Employees of the “District of Columbia Municipal
Corporation” and its United Nations successors are being used as jack-booted thugs to
throw Americans into privately owned “federal correctional facilities” when those who need
correction—- the members of the American Bar Association and the euphemistically named
and privately owned and operated “DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE”—continue to ignore the fact
that Americans DO have a choice and that by the millions we are demanding our freedom
from all these pathetic false commercial claims and presumptions.

We are standing up before the whole world and telling these privately owned “governmental
services corporations” to go bankrupt like any other corporation that doesn’t do its job and
mind its budget. These entities deserve to go bankrupt and worse. They have spent money
and credit that was never theirs to spend. They have defrauded millions if not billions of
innocent people and they have prevented Americans from claiming their birthrights for far
too long.

These people— the members of Congress and the various “Presidents” of the numerous
“United States” corporations — have acted as criminals. They deserve to be recognized as
such.

The members of the American Bar Association have attempted to wash their hands while
profiting from the situation and obstructing justice. They stand around shrugging and
saying, “Well, it’s a political choice. We don’t have anything to say about that.”—–yet at
the same time, they refuse to correct the probate records to reflect our chosen change of
political status when we plainly identify ourselves and enunciate our Will for them. They,
too, deserve to be recognized as self-interested criminals and accomplices to identity theft,
credit fraud, and worse— which is why we have recently issued a $279 trillion dollar
commercial obligation lien against the American Bar Association, the International Bar
Association, and the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

All our assets— our bodies, homes, businesses, lands, and labor—have been signed over
into the “Public Charitable Trust” by con men merely claiming to represent us. Then, when
we object to their lies and entrapment, they use the same fraud against us as their excuse
for bringing more false claims against us and throwing us in jail. Enough is enough.
The British Monarch and the Lords of the Admiralty have promoted this fraud against us at
the same time they have claimed to be our trustees, allies and friends in perpetuity. It’s
time to clear the way for us to politely and peaceably exit from any presumption that we are
or ever were “US citizens”, willing participants in the “Public Charitable Trust”, or willing
“sureties” for the debts of any private bank-run governmental services corporation merely
calling itself the United States of Something or Other.

We repudiate any presumption of private municipal citizenship or obligation to the District of
Columbia Municipal Corporation or any successor thereof, and demand an immediate and
permanent correction of the civil record to reflect our birthright status as American State
Citizens, nunc pro tunc.

As for you, as “Federal Agents”, you have a lot to think about. For starters— who really
pays your paycheck? Is it the goons in Washington, DC? Or does it all come from the
American people you are supposed to be serving? Do you believe for one moment that
anyone just lined up and gave their gold to FDR voluntarily? Do you believe that anyone
gave away all their property and the guarantees of the actual Constitution for the “privilege”
of paying for Social Security? No?

Wake up and smell the java and start doing your real jobs. If anyone complains—arrest
him. We are reopening the American Common Law Courts expressly for the purpose of
settling disputes related to living people and their property assets in excess of $20 as
mandated by the Seventh Amendment.

We, the American people, are the ones holding absolute civil authority upon the land of the
Continental United States, and we give you permission to arrest the members of Congress,
the President, the Secretary of the Treasury, and any other politician or appointee
pretending to speak for us so as to enslave us and bring false claims against us via this
institutionalized fraud scheme. We want it recognized for what it is and dismantled and
repudiated tout de suite.

Any court that is caught arresting and prosecuting Americans under the presumptions just
described to you— such as bringing charges against foreign situs trusts with names styled
like this: John Quincy Adams, or Cestui Que Vie trusts styled like this: JOHN QUINCY
ADAMS, or Puerto Rican public transmitting utilities styled like this: JOHN Q. ADAMS—-it is
your responsibility to make sure that any individuals being addressed by these courts were
actually born in the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, or one of the other Insular
States and that they are not ignorant American State Citizens being falsely registered and
railroaded.

Do you understand? Is it now completely clear who the criminals are? Your actual employers
and benefactors are being attacked and defrauded by criminals pretending to act as their
elected representatives and accomplices in black robes who are serving as enforcers of this
fraud for profit. This has been happening right under your noses.

This whole circumstance has escaped broad scale public understanding because it was being
pursued by private governmental services corporations owned and operated by international
banking cartels who claimed that these “private arrangements” were none of the public’s
business, despite the grotesque and far-ranging impact these cozy understandings have had
upon the people of this and many other countries.

Let it be perfectly clear to you that the business of these private corporations has become
our business because they have operated in violation of their charters, in violation of the
treaties allowing their existence, and in violation of the National Trust. The American Bar
Association and the Internal Revenue Service have both been owned and operated as
private foreign bill collectors and trust administrators by Northern Trust, Inc., in violent
conflict of interest. They are not professional associations, non-profits, nor units of
government. They are con artists and privateers whose licenses expired as of September 1,
2013.

The United States Marshals Service is enabled to act in the capacity of constitutionally –
sworn Federal Marshals and we invoke their office and service as such; failure to accept the
public office means rejection of all authority related to us. The same may be said of the FBI.
Either you do your jobs as constitutionally sworn public officers, or you act as private mall
cops in behalf of the offending corporations and under color of law when you pretend to
have any public authority or function.

This is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger
Alaska State Superior Court

 

http://annavonreitz.com/dearfederalagents.pdf

 

==================================================

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyper link is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House. ~~~ Xaniel777

Mad Max The Road Warrior 1a

“What??..ME WORRIED??…AHAHAAAAA…”

 ©2009 – 2015 DaniMartExtras,too

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

EYE’S OPEN: 2 Weeks Later – Virginia Shooting Hoax Completely Vanished From Mainstream Media

Posted by Xaniel777 on September 15, 2015

SOURCE: ACTIVIST POST

[XANIEL’S NOTE: I have already shared this story through all of my Social Media sites but decided it was even more important to share through this website !! Spread the word and keep-up with updates at ACTIVIST POST linked above.~Xaniel777]

media liesBy Bernie Suarez

Throughout alternative media over the last few years many people have written about what to look for in a false flag. Many including yours truly have outlined steps to look for when trying to diagnose the next government false flag. Many of us have a good grasp on what to look for.

Let’s review some of these common trends:

1 – Police,  military or federal agency “drills” are almost always going on at about the same time of the staged event.

2 – The accused patsy is always followed by and/or in contact with FBI, police or other government agency for months or years prior.

3 – Accused patsy is often aided by the same federal agencies with the acquisition of weapons needed for the false flag event.

4 – Patsies almost always end up dead usually due to “suicide,” deadly “manhunt” or they are captured in a physical or mental state that ensures they won’t be speaking much.

5 – Patsies almost always leave behind one of those bizarre “manifestos” which conveniently outline all their intentions that seems to always fit perfectly into the scripted official story.

6 – Mainstream media jumps on the story with the usual over-the-top 24/7 coverage to make sure you are aware of the story, always thinking about it, and you are afraid.

7 – Damaging contradicting facts, video footage, audio, documents or social media/online revelations are always completely ignored by mainstream media.

8 – When applicable, conflicting information is almost always erased, blocked or closed out by Facebook, Twitter or YouTube, etc.

9 – The control system resorts to accusations of “conspiracy theories” very early on to discourage anyone from looking too deeply into the story being presented.

10 – Early on, we see strange-acting family members on TV crying without tears, displaying inappropriate affect and emotion, and quickly calling for gun control or some other political agenda in response to the event.

11 – Politicians are also always on TV immediately calling for new legislation in response to the event. The political “solution” always takes away more and more of our freedoms and gives more and more power to the federal government.

These 11 items are just a glimpse of the repeated script we’ve seen played out here in America every time the controllers orchestrate a false flag crisis-actor event.

After the recent Virginia TV Reporter staged shooting event at the end of August 2015, however, I want to add one more crucial item to look for only because we’re seeing it now so blatant and so obvious.

12 – If the false flag terror, shooting or bombing event is exposed convincingly, and it seems like too many people are figuring it out due to newly released evidence, then pull the story completely out of the public consciousness as a form of damage control by having the story vanish completely from the mainstream media news.

This is what we are now seeing. It’s been slightly over 2 weeks now and the media has said nothing about the Virginia TV Reporter shooting like it never happened. Could it be that this silence which began over a week ago is directly related to the overwhelming evidence of a second take in the staged shooting incident? This evidence did after all put a major crimp in the authenticity of the story. It was the death blow in a long list of entirely unbelievable coincidences. Some lies are difficult to recover from once too many people know; and, as we are seeing, sometimes it’s best to pull the whole story out of the media and hope it fades away for good.

Here’s something for everyone to consider. Perhaps the initial shock value and the reaction of the masses to the shooting was the whole point of the shooting. I’ve discussed another possibility recently which everyone should at least consider and that is – what if it was intended for truth seekers and alternative media to figure out that this latest shooting was fake? Sounds ridiculous? Not if you consider that we are still in the final days of operation Jade Helm where Jade 2 artificial intelligence software is still reading, absorbing and observing the reactions and actions of the human domain. That’s right. It is quite possible that humanity is being played with ridiculous false flag events just to observe and record the effect it has so that artificial intelligence software can use that information for future strategizing against the human domain. This is a primary stated purpose of operation Jade Helm and for that reason all truth seekers should be thinking on their feet and remaining highly vigilant.

So this lightning speed removal of the Virginia shooting story from mainstream media should also serve as a reminder that researching every item of a false flag and spreading the information early on is important and sometimes can change the course of how the story is being told as we are seeing here.

Ironically, I spoke about this topic briefly almost a year ago when few people noticed that the 2 year Sandy Hook shooting anniversary came and left while the mainstream media practically ignored the anniversary of the entire event. This no doubt was in response to all the information that became available about the Sandy Hook crisis actor shooting that many people didn’t know the year before. CIA’s mainstream media clearly made a strategic decision to tune the event out of people’s minds in December of 2014. Will they make the same decision this year or will they stage a new shooting to revive the Sandy Hook feelings again? Will they coach a new eyewitness analogous to the “I shot Bin Laden” psyop of Spring 2015?

As I mentioned in my article then regarding the Sandy Hook ignored anniversary phenomenon, if the Sandy Hook shooting was real and all those children died in a bloody massacre, think of how big of a deal it would be to ignore the second anniversary of the supposed largest mass shooting in the history of the United States involving children. That’s exactly what happened December of 2014 and again this seems to be another sign to look for with failed false flags.

Thanks to the Internet and the information and technology age we live in, we can now diagnose government false flags in nearly real-time. It’s exciting to dismantle government and mainstream media lies as fast as we’re able to do it today. Let’s just hope these skills humanity has developed for sharp discernment for false flags can be harnessed in a more meaningful way.

Despite the skills humanity has amassed at diagnosing false flag events we still lack the skills at ensuring proper and swift justice and punishment is carried out on the perpetrators. And we have also failed at forcing police and government agencies to be transparent with all records surrounding the investigation of these false flag events. They continue staging these events in part because they continue to operate both with immunity and in secret. All of the investigative records continue to be kept a secret from the general public.

So let’s hope truth seekers, activists, investigators and independent media can use the recent already-forgotten Virginia TV Reporter shooting to implement these necessary improvements when the next false flag event comes around. For if we cannot do this then we are just trading information with each other for the sake of information while nothing really gets done about the corruption behind these events.

Solutions

This latest false flag reminds us that as politicians use these events to call for more gun laws and less freedoms, we should be using these events to call for more and more transparency in investigations for the purposes of defending against staged events and false flags. We need a truth and transparency mass counter effort. Let’s support those who are putting their lives and reputations on the line to expose events like the Sandy Hook show, Boston bombing, Virginia shooting and other false flag politically driven events because important counter corruption and counter secrecy legislation could potentially gain traction.

Ultimately, as I mentioned earlier, we are seeing the result of information-sharing and that is why it’s important to share information and help spread the truth whichever way you can. With the Virginia shooting completely faded (for now) from the pubic mind, let’s consider this another small victory for truth. Remember that the controllers usually don’t let go stories so quickly. They usually want to get as much out of a story as possible. So let’s begin familiarizing ourselves with the psychology of the presentation of these stories. What drives these stories into the news and what drives them out? Let’s ask questions like – why does one story in the news last one day while another lasts for weeks? Observing these patterns and developing the skills to answer these questions will make all of us experts at diagnosing propaganda, staged news, and crisis actor false flags.

Image Credit

Bernie is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TV project where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems. His efforts are designed to encourage others to joyfully stand for truth, to expose government tactics of propaganda, fear and deception, and to address the psychology of dealing with the rising new world order. He is also a former U.S. Marine who believes it is our duty to stand for and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. A peace activist, he believes information and awareness is the first step toward being free from enslavement from the globalist control system which now threatens humanity. He believes love conquers all fear and it is up to each and every one of us to manifest the solutions and the change that you want to see in this world, because doing this is the very thing that will ensure victory and restoration of the human race from the rising global enslavement system, and will offer hope to future generations.

FIND MORE STORIES AT ACTIVIST POST

==================================================

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyper link is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House. ~~~ Xaniel777

Mad Max The Road Warrior 1a

“What??..ME WORRIED??…AHAHAAAAA…”

 ©2009 – 2015 DaniMartExtras,too

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , | Comments Off on EYE’S OPEN: 2 Weeks Later – Virginia Shooting Hoax Completely Vanished From Mainstream Media

…but I repeat myself: Obamacare Could be Heading to the Supreme Court (Again)

Posted by Xaniel777 on August 13, 2015

SOURCE: cnsnews.com

[XANIEL’S NOTE: This story explains in better detail, the rant I had in my last update. See story below this one.~~Xaniel777]

obamacare blunder 1

By Andrew Kloster | August 13, 2015 | 4:52 PM EDT

This past week, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, over the vigorous dissent of four judges on that court, denied rehearing en banc (legalese for an entire court rather than just a panel of three judges) in the case of Sissel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services.

Sissel is a case against Obamacare led by the Pacific Legal Foundation, arguing that Obamacare is invalid because it violated the Origination Clause.

Now, the challengers have ninety days to file a writ of certiorari (an appeal) before the U.S. Supreme Court.

This important case deals with the Origination Clause of the Constitution— which reads:

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

The Founders included this clause primarily to balance out the unique powers the Senate wields, and to ensure that the power of drawing revenue from the people by taxing them would be initiated by the branch that was closest to them (remember, at that time the Senate was elected by state legislatures, not by popular vote) and whose members would have to stand for re-election every two years.

In the first major Obamacare decision, NFIB v. Sibelius, the Court upheld the law as a tax—something that surprised many people.

But if it’s a tax, shouldn’t the bill have originated in the House?

As it happens, Obamacare “originated” in the House in only a very formalistic sense.

H.R. 3590, the bill that became Obamacare, was originally titled “Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009” and had nothing to do with health care.

But to secure passage of Obamacare, the Senate decided to take this bill, which had passed the House, and gut it entirely, replacing the entire text of that bill with the Obamacare title and text and keeping only the bill number.

After it passed the Senate, the House then approved the new Senate-drafted bill through a reconciliation bill.

The House made no changes to the text, which, because of the Senate’s obscure procedural rules, meant that when the bill went back to the Senate, it was not subject to a filibuster.

This was significant because, in the interim, Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., had died and been replaced by Scott Brown, R-Mass., thereby depriving the Democrats of the 60 votes they would need to defeat an otherwise inevitable Republican filibuster.

And thus was Obamacare born.

The problem is that this doesn’t look like the bill “originated” in the House in any meaningful way.

It was as though the Senate bulldozed a house and erected an entirely new structure, but said it was the same house because it had the same address.

And so Pacific Legal Foundation has sued.

Recently, they lost their challenge before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

When this happens, plaintiffs have a chance to get the entire circuit to reassess the question.

But just last week, the D.C. Circuit, unsurprisingly, declined to rehear the case en banc.

Why unsurprisingly?

Because it takes a majority on the court to revisit a case and you might recall that then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., invoked the “nuclear option” to get more Obama appointees on the D.C. Circuit.

All three of the judges rammed through by Reid voted to deny rehearing en banc last week: more importantly, Judge Nina Pillard took the rare step of penning a supporting statement for denial of rehearing.

Her interesting statement was joined by the other two judges on the original panel including Judge Robert Wilkins, who was also one of the judges confirmed as part of Senator Reid’s court packing plan.

The decision is fundamentally flawed.

Some, including Justice Antonin Scalia in his concurring opinion in U.S. v. Munoz-Flores, have argued that the Origination Clause is a mere formalism and that, so long as a bill attests to having originated in the House, federal courts should not undertake an independent investigation to determine whether that billactually originated in the House.

This formalist reading is one reason James Madison opposed putting the Origination Clause in the Constitution.

The statement by Pillard, however, goes much further.

The Supreme Court, Pillard argues, has defined the Origination Clause as a “purposive” clause.

In other words, the original three-judge panel contends that since the main purpose of Obamacare was to expand health insurance coverage, rather to raise revenue for the general treasury—well, then the law is not a bill to raise revenue (even if, as the Supreme Court stated in its NFIB decision, the legislation has the potential to raise “considerable revenue”).

Under this precedent, the Senate could originate any tax bill, so long as some federal court was willing to hold that the “purpose” of the bill wasn’t primarily to raise tax revenue, but to do something else.

If that is the case, so much for the protections provided by the Origination Clause.

We will have to wait to see if the Supreme Court will hear this case.

At this point, however, after two trips to the Supreme Court already, the Court might be too invested in Obamacare to seriously consider taking a third case and ruling based upon the law.

As Scalia stated in his dissent in King v. Burwell, the second major Obamacare case:

“[T]his Court’s two decisions on the Act will surely be remembered through the years. The somersaults of statutory interpretation they have performed (“penalty” means tax … “established by the State” means not established by the State) will be cited by liti­gants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence. And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites.”

Andrew R. Kloster is a legal fellow in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, focusing on civil rights, the role of the federal courts and other constitutional issues.

cnsnews Editor’s Note: This piece was originally published by The Heritage Foundation.

==================================================

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyper link is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House. ~~~ Xaniel777

Mad Max The Road Warrior 1a

“What??..ME WORRIED??…AHAHAAAAA…”

 ©2009 – 2015 DaniMartExtras,too

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on …but I repeat myself: Obamacare Could be Heading to the Supreme Court (Again)

WTF: D.C. Circuit splits on Origination Clause in latest Obamacare challenge

Posted by Xaniel777 on August 8, 2015

SOURCE:  THE WASHINGTON POST

[XANIEL’S RANT OF THE DAY:    THIS WHOLE THING IS BULLSHIT!!

FYI: I am neither Demo-crap or Repub-puck as I would not be able to handle the stench of myself

from being either one!
Consider me a “Constitutionalist”

Heres what one comment about this article had to say and it matches what I said when Harry Reid first pulled this crap –

Comment by – Bill Walker 12:18 PM PDT

“Although the original House bill was amended and its language replaced in the Senate, such Senate amendments are permissible under the Clause’s text and precedent.” This isn’t just a lie, it is a DAMN LIE. The original bill was not just amended. The whole damn thing was erased and replaced with Harry Reid and the Senate’s version of the ACA. The way this law was passed was despicable, from start to finish. And guess what… over 50% of the country still hates the damn law and wants it either replaced or repealed outright. To say anything else is a lie. But hey, that’s what people like this writer have been doing for years… Gotta cover for the Democrats.”

Bill Walker is someone who gets it!!

As another side note for your consideration: The only thing left of this House Bill when Reid gutted it, was the Original House Bill Number.

The original House Bill that was sent to the Senate and gutted by Reid had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH CARE!!!

WHAT WAS AMENDED?  NOTHING was amended because there was nothing left of it.

It was completely erased as Bill Walker stated.

Reid then REPLACED the entire thing with the ACA and then forced a quick vote in the Demo-crap controlled Senate

and instead of sending it back to the House for a vote as he was suppose to do by Law,

he illegally kicked it to the President who signed it into law!

If this President had had any kind of Honor at all, he, himself, would have refused to sign it until the House had voted for it.

This President is as corrupt as Reid is!

So what the hell is this joke of a Judge, (Judge Kavanaugh), even talking about??

If what this idiot says were really true, then what is to keep every bill going to the Senate from the House from being completely gutted, replaced, quickly voted on

and to the President it goes to be illegally signed into law.

There would be no accountability and the House would never have any say as it would be bypassed on every issue, making them irrelevant.
(I know, I know, most say they and the Senate are already irrelevant, but that’s another rant for another day)

As such our form of government would collapse as it is pretty much doing now.

Maybe it’s time to stop playing this game and start arresting ALL these corrupt fools before it’s too late!!

“NUFF SAID “~Xaniel777]

END OF RANT

… WE NOW RETURN YOU TO YOUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED BULLSHIT …

STORY PICKS UP HERE:

August 7, 2015

Today the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a petition for rehearing en banc in Sissel v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, another constitutional challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).  The plaintiffs allege the ACA violates the Origination Clause of the U.S. Constitution because it is a bill for raising revenue and did not originate in the House of Representatives. The Origination Clause in Article I, Section 7, provides “All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.”

Last year, a three-judge panel rejected the challenge, concluding that although the ACA raises substantial revenue and the individual mandate was ultimately sustained by the Supreme Court as an exercise of the taxing power, the ACA was not properly considered a “Bill for raising Revenue” under the clause because any revenue-raising in the act is “incidental” to its primary purposes.

On review of a petition for rehearing en banc, the full D.C. Circuit was unanimous that the plaintiffs’ challenge must fail, but disagreed sharply on the rationale. Judge Kavanaugh, joined by Judges Henderson, Brown and Griffith, dissented from the denial of en banc on the grounds that the original three-judge panel erred in its Origination Clause challenge.  According to Kavanaugh, the ACA is a “Bill for raising Revenue,” but satisfied the Origination Clause because the bill formally originated in the House. (For what it’s worth, I suggested that this was the reason any such challenges would have a difficult time when commenting on another D.C. Circuit decision in a challenge involving the Origination Clause last year.)

Here is how Judge Kavanaugh’s 32-page dissent begins:

This case raises a serious constitutional question about the 2010 Affordable Care Act, one of the most consequential laws ever enacted by Congress. Did Congress’s enactment of the Act comport with the Origination Clause of the Constitution? The Origination Clause provides: “All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.” U.S. Const. art. 1, § 7, cl. 1. The Origination Clause therefore requires that bills for “raising Revenue” originate in the House of Representatives. Revenue bills may be amended in the Senate “as on other Bills,” but they must originate in the House. If the Affordable Care Act did not meet the requirements of the Origination Clause, then the Act – or at least revenue-raising provisions such as the individual mandate – must be invalidated.

In my view, the Affordable Care Act complied with the Origination Clause, but not for the reason articulated by the three-judge panel opinion. The panel opinion concluded that the Affordable Care Act was not a revenue-raising bill for purposes of the Origination Clause and therefore did not have to originate in the House. In my respectful view, that conclusion is untenable. The Affordable Care Act established new subsidies for the purchase of health insurance and expanded the Medicaid program for low-income Americans. Those new subsidies and expanded entitlements cost an enormous amount of money. So as not to increase the annual budget deficit and the overall national debt, the Act imposed numerous taxes to raise revenue. Lots of revenue. $473 billion in revenue over 10 years. It is difficult to say with a straight face that a bill raising $473 billion in revenue is not a “Bill for raising Revenue.”

The Affordable Care Act therefore was a revenue-raising bill subject to the Origination Clause. That said, the Act did in fact originate in the House, as required by the Clause. Although the original House bill was amended and its language replaced in the Senate, such Senate amendments are permissible under the Clause’s text and precedent.

So in concluding that the Affordable Care Act complied with the Origination Clause, the panel opinion reached the right bottom line, but relied on what I see as a faulty rationale. Does such a case still warrant en banc review? Oftentimes no, but here yes. The panel opinion sets a constitutional precedent that is too important to let linger and metastasize. Although no doubt viewed by some today as a trivial or anachronistic annoyance, the Origination Clause was an integral part of the Framers’ blueprint for protecting the people from excessive federal taxation. It is true that the Framers’ decision to grant the Senate a broad amendment power gave the Origination Clause less bite than it otherwise might have had. But the Clause nonetheless has been important historically and remains vital in the modern legislative process. By newly exempting a substantial swath of tax legislation from the Origination Clause, the panel opinion degrades the House’s origination authority in a way contrary to the Constitution’s text and history, and contrary to congressional practice. As a result, the panel opinion upsets the longstanding balance of power between the House and the Senate regarding the initiation of tax legislation. Therefore, I would grant rehearing en banc. In my respectful view, the en banc Court should vacate the panel opinion and rule for the Government on the ground that the Affordable Care Act originated in the House and thereby complied with the Origination Clause.

… SEE MY RANT TO ALL OF THIS ABOVE !!~~Xaniel777 …

… AT ANY RATE, THIS JOKE OF A  JUDGE CONTINUES BUT YOU WILL HAVE TO

READ THE REST OF THIS STORY AT THE WASHINGTON POST

==================================================

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyper link is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House. ~~~ Xaniel777

Mad Max The Road Warrior 1a

 

“What??..ME WORRIED??…AHAHAAAAA…”

 ©2009 – 2015 DaniMartExtras,too

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on WTF: D.C. Circuit splits on Origination Clause in latest Obamacare challenge

New Technology to Free Humanity

Posted by Xaniel777 on July 7, 2015

SOURCE: Scribd

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/270635111/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&show_recommendations=true

A New Technology To Free Humanity
This is the system described by Alekz and Mr. Keshe during the 68th Knowledge seeker workshop.

You can see the broadcast here:
www.keshefoundation.org/broadcast

Omega Quantum
Star Formation Reactors
http://keshefoundation.org/shop/product/view/5/146

The Peace Roadmap
http://keshefoundation.org/new-horizons/peace-roadmap

==================================================

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyper link is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House. ~~~ Xaniel777

Mad Max The Road Warrior 1a

 ©2009 – 2015 DaniMartExtras,too

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , | Comments Off on New Technology to Free Humanity

You Will NOT Speak The Truth: A Zionist project to criminalize criticism of Israel

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 22, 2015

SOURCE: Redress Information & Analysis

Boycott Israel

By Lawrence Davidson – June 9, 2015

Some historical background

From the 1920s to the 1990s, the Zionists controlled the storyline in the West on the Israel-Palestine conflict. This meant that their version of history was the only version as far as most of the people in the West were concerned. Consequentially, they had an uncontested media field to label the Palestinians and their supporters as “terrorists” – the charge of anti-Semitism was not yet widely used. Also, as a consequence of their monopoly, the Zionists did not bother to engage in public debate.

Then, over the last 20 years the Zionists slowly lost their monopoly. In part, this was due to the fact that in 1993 the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) recognized Israel’s right to exist and renounced terrorism, and in the following years many of the Arab states made or offered peace. However, the Israelis did not respond in kind. In particular, they failed to respond in a fair and just way to US-sponsored peace efforts. Why so?

The answer to why the Israelis did not, in good faith, take up multiple historic opportunities to make peace with the Palestinians lies in the very nature of the Zionist movement. From its beginning, and certainly from the establishment of the state of Israel, Zionism has been driven by dreams of colonial expansion and religious exclusiveness. Each of these goals is seen as part of Zionism’s God-given mission, and they still prevail. Professor David Schulman of Hebrew University, writing in the New York Review of Books (23 April 2015), describes the consequences of this situation: “The Israeli electorate is still dominated by hyper-nationalist, in some cases proto-fascist, figures. It is no way inclined to make peace. It has given a clear mandate for policies… that will further deepen Israel’s colonial venture.” As a consequence, Israel’s credibility with an increasing number of people in the West has eroded.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on You Will NOT Speak The Truth: A Zionist project to criminalize criticism of Israel

Western Media – The Best Money Can Buy: Truth Has Been Murdered

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 21, 2015

SOURCE: RINF ALTERNATIVE NEWS

By Paul Craig Roberts

JUNE 19, 2015

washington-dc

(RINF) – The Obama regime and its neocon monsters and European vassals have resurrected a Nazi government and located it in Ukraine. Read this statement by Elena Bondarenko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament: http://slavyangrad.org/2015/04/18/statement-by-elena-bondarenko-peoples-deputy-of-verkhovna-rada-of-ukraine/

The Western media has created a fictional account of events in Ukraine. The coup organized by the Obama regime that overthrew the elected democratic government in Ukraine is never mentioned. The militias decked out in Nazi symbols are ignored. These militias are the principle source of the violence that has been inflicted on the Russian populations, resulting in the formation of the break-away republics. Instead of reporting this fact, the corrupt Western media delivers Washington’s propaganda that Russia has invaded and is annexing eastern and southern Ukraine. British and European politicians parrot Washington’s lies.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , | Comments Off on Western Media – The Best Money Can Buy: Truth Has Been Murdered

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,187 other followers

%d bloggers like this: