DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

DaniMartExtras, Too

Posted by Xaniel777 on October 26, 2011

MAIN STREAM MEDIA’S NATURAL BORN NEMESIS

“EVERY RACE, EVERY TRIBE, ONE AMERICA!”

 FIND A MILITIA NEAR YOU AT : WELL REGULATED AMERICAN MILITIAS !

 WRAM – WE DEDICATE OUR HEARTS,MINDS AND BODIES TO PROTECTING OUR GREAT REPUBLIC!

DON’T FORGET TO CHECK OUT OUR ENLIGHTENMENT BLOG AT Tetra-Trinity Chronicles

AND OUR OTHER ENLIGHTENMENT BLOG AT REALITY SHIFTS

Rachel Corrie American Hero 1

 

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

…but I repeat myself: Obamacare Could be Heading to the Supreme Court (Again)

Posted by Xaniel777 on August 13, 2015

SOURCE: cnsnews.com

[XANIEL’S NOTE: This story explains in better detail, the rant I had in my last update. See story below this one.~~Xaniel777]

obamacare blunder 1

By Andrew Kloster | August 13, 2015 | 4:52 PM EDT

This past week, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, over the vigorous dissent of four judges on that court, denied rehearing en banc (legalese for an entire court rather than just a panel of three judges) in the case of Sissel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services.

Sissel is a case against Obamacare led by the Pacific Legal Foundation, arguing that Obamacare is invalid because it violated the Origination Clause.

Now, the challengers have ninety days to file a writ of certiorari (an appeal) before the U.S. Supreme Court.

This important case deals with the Origination Clause of the Constitution— which reads:

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

The Founders included this clause primarily to balance out the unique powers the Senate wields, and to ensure that the power of drawing revenue from the people by taxing them would be initiated by the branch that was closest to them (remember, at that time the Senate was elected by state legislatures, not by popular vote) and whose members would have to stand for re-election every two years.

In the first major Obamacare decision, NFIB v. Sibelius, the Court upheld the law as a tax—something that surprised many people.

But if it’s a tax, shouldn’t the bill have originated in the House?

As it happens, Obamacare “originated” in the House in only a very formalistic sense.

H.R. 3590, the bill that became Obamacare, was originally titled “Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009” and had nothing to do with health care.

But to secure passage of Obamacare, the Senate decided to take this bill, which had passed the House, and gut it entirely, replacing the entire text of that bill with the Obamacare title and text and keeping only the bill number.

After it passed the Senate, the House then approved the new Senate-drafted bill through a reconciliation bill.

The House made no changes to the text, which, because of the Senate’s obscure procedural rules, meant that when the bill went back to the Senate, it was not subject to a filibuster.

This was significant because, in the interim, Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., had died and been replaced by Scott Brown, R-Mass., thereby depriving the Democrats of the 60 votes they would need to defeat an otherwise inevitable Republican filibuster.

And thus was Obamacare born.

The problem is that this doesn’t look like the bill “originated” in the House in any meaningful way.

It was as though the Senate bulldozed a house and erected an entirely new structure, but said it was the same house because it had the same address.

And so Pacific Legal Foundation has sued.

Recently, they lost their challenge before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

When this happens, plaintiffs have a chance to get the entire circuit to reassess the question.

But just last week, the D.C. Circuit, unsurprisingly, declined to rehear the case en banc.

Why unsurprisingly?

Because it takes a majority on the court to revisit a case and you might recall that then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., invoked the “nuclear option” to get more Obama appointees on the D.C. Circuit.

All three of the judges rammed through by Reid voted to deny rehearing en banc last week: more importantly, Judge Nina Pillard took the rare step of penning a supporting statement for denial of rehearing.

Her interesting statement was joined by the other two judges on the original panel including Judge Robert Wilkins, who was also one of the judges confirmed as part of Senator Reid’s court packing plan.

The decision is fundamentally flawed.

Some, including Justice Antonin Scalia in his concurring opinion in U.S. v. Munoz-Flores, have argued that the Origination Clause is a mere formalism and that, so long as a bill attests to having originated in the House, federal courts should not undertake an independent investigation to determine whether that billactually originated in the House.

This formalist reading is one reason James Madison opposed putting the Origination Clause in the Constitution.

The statement by Pillard, however, goes much further.

The Supreme Court, Pillard argues, has defined the Origination Clause as a “purposive” clause.

In other words, the original three-judge panel contends that since the main purpose of Obamacare was to expand health insurance coverage, rather to raise revenue for the general treasury—well, then the law is not a bill to raise revenue (even if, as the Supreme Court stated in its NFIB decision, the legislation has the potential to raise “considerable revenue”).

Under this precedent, the Senate could originate any tax bill, so long as some federal court was willing to hold that the “purpose” of the bill wasn’t primarily to raise tax revenue, but to do something else.

If that is the case, so much for the protections provided by the Origination Clause.

We will have to wait to see if the Supreme Court will hear this case.

At this point, however, after two trips to the Supreme Court already, the Court might be too invested in Obamacare to seriously consider taking a third case and ruling based upon the law.

As Scalia stated in his dissent in King v. Burwell, the second major Obamacare case:

“[T]his Court’s two decisions on the Act will surely be remembered through the years. The somersaults of statutory interpretation they have performed (“penalty” means tax … “established by the State” means not established by the State) will be cited by liti­gants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence. And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites.”

Andrew R. Kloster is a legal fellow in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, focusing on civil rights, the role of the federal courts and other constitutional issues.

cnsnews Editor’s Note: This piece was originally published by The Heritage Foundation.

==================================================

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyper link is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House. ~~~ Xaniel777

Mad Max The Road Warrior 1a

“What??..ME WORRIED??…AHAHAAAAA…”

 ©2009 – 2015 DaniMartExtras,too

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

WTF: D.C. Circuit splits on Origination Clause in latest Obamacare challenge

Posted by Xaniel777 on August 8, 2015

SOURCE:  THE WASHINGTON POST

[XANIEL’S RANT OF THE DAY:    THIS WHOLE THING IS BULLSHIT!!

FYI: I am neither Demo-crap or Repub-puck as I would not be able to handle the stench of myself

from being either one!
Consider me a “Constitutionalist”

Heres what one comment about this article had to say and it matches what I said when Harry Reid first pulled this crap –

Comment by – Bill Walker 12:18 PM PDT

“Although the original House bill was amended and its language replaced in the Senate, such Senate amendments are permissible under the Clause’s text and precedent.” This isn’t just a lie, it is a DAMN LIE. The original bill was not just amended. The whole damn thing was erased and replaced with Harry Reid and the Senate’s version of the ACA. The way this law was passed was despicable, from start to finish. And guess what… over 50% of the country still hates the damn law and wants it either replaced or repealed outright. To say anything else is a lie. But hey, that’s what people like this writer have been doing for years… Gotta cover for the Democrats.”

Bill Walker is someone who gets it!!

As another side note for your consideration: The only thing left of this House Bill when Reid gutted it, was the Original House Bill Number.

The original House Bill that was sent to the Senate and gutted by Reid had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH CARE!!!

WHAT WAS AMENDED?  NOTHING was amended because there was nothing left of it.

It was completely erased as Bill Walker stated.

Reid then REPLACED the entire thing with the ACA and then forced a quick vote in the Demo-crap controlled Senate

and instead of sending it back to the House for a vote as he was suppose to do by Law,

he illegally kicked it to the President who signed it into law!

If this President had had any kind of Honor at all, he, himself, would have refused to sign it until the House had voted for it.

This President is as corrupt as Reid is!

So what the hell is this joke of a Judge, (Judge Kavanaugh), even talking about??

If what this idiot says were really true, then what is to keep every bill going to the Senate from the House from being completely gutted, replaced, quickly voted on

and to the President it goes to be illegally signed into law.

There would be no accountability and the House would never have any say as it would be bypassed on every issue, making them irrelevant.
(I know, I know, most say they and the Senate are already irrelevant, but that’s another rant for another day)

As such our form of government would collapse as it is pretty much doing now.

Maybe it’s time to stop playing this game and start arresting ALL these corrupt fools before it’s too late!!

“NUFF SAID “~Xaniel777]

END OF RANT

… WE NOW RETURN YOU TO YOUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED BULLSHIT …

STORY PICKS UP HERE:

August 7, 2015

Today the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a petition for rehearing en banc in Sissel v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, another constitutional challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).  The plaintiffs allege the ACA violates the Origination Clause of the U.S. Constitution because it is a bill for raising revenue and did not originate in the House of Representatives. The Origination Clause in Article I, Section 7, provides “All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.”

Last year, a three-judge panel rejected the challenge, concluding that although the ACA raises substantial revenue and the individual mandate was ultimately sustained by the Supreme Court as an exercise of the taxing power, the ACA was not properly considered a “Bill for raising Revenue” under the clause because any revenue-raising in the act is “incidental” to its primary purposes.

On review of a petition for rehearing en banc, the full D.C. Circuit was unanimous that the plaintiffs’ challenge must fail, but disagreed sharply on the rationale. Judge Kavanaugh, joined by Judges Henderson, Brown and Griffith, dissented from the denial of en banc on the grounds that the original three-judge panel erred in its Origination Clause challenge.  According to Kavanaugh, the ACA is a “Bill for raising Revenue,” but satisfied the Origination Clause because the bill formally originated in the House. (For what it’s worth, I suggested that this was the reason any such challenges would have a difficult time when commenting on another D.C. Circuit decision in a challenge involving the Origination Clause last year.)

Here is how Judge Kavanaugh’s 32-page dissent begins:

This case raises a serious constitutional question about the 2010 Affordable Care Act, one of the most consequential laws ever enacted by Congress. Did Congress’s enactment of the Act comport with the Origination Clause of the Constitution? The Origination Clause provides: “All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.” U.S. Const. art. 1, § 7, cl. 1. The Origination Clause therefore requires that bills for “raising Revenue” originate in the House of Representatives. Revenue bills may be amended in the Senate “as on other Bills,” but they must originate in the House. If the Affordable Care Act did not meet the requirements of the Origination Clause, then the Act – or at least revenue-raising provisions such as the individual mandate – must be invalidated.

In my view, the Affordable Care Act complied with the Origination Clause, but not for the reason articulated by the three-judge panel opinion. The panel opinion concluded that the Affordable Care Act was not a revenue-raising bill for purposes of the Origination Clause and therefore did not have to originate in the House. In my respectful view, that conclusion is untenable. The Affordable Care Act established new subsidies for the purchase of health insurance and expanded the Medicaid program for low-income Americans. Those new subsidies and expanded entitlements cost an enormous amount of money. So as not to increase the annual budget deficit and the overall national debt, the Act imposed numerous taxes to raise revenue. Lots of revenue. $473 billion in revenue over 10 years. It is difficult to say with a straight face that a bill raising $473 billion in revenue is not a “Bill for raising Revenue.”

The Affordable Care Act therefore was a revenue-raising bill subject to the Origination Clause. That said, the Act did in fact originate in the House, as required by the Clause. Although the original House bill was amended and its language replaced in the Senate, such Senate amendments are permissible under the Clause’s text and precedent.

So in concluding that the Affordable Care Act complied with the Origination Clause, the panel opinion reached the right bottom line, but relied on what I see as a faulty rationale. Does such a case still warrant en banc review? Oftentimes no, but here yes. The panel opinion sets a constitutional precedent that is too important to let linger and metastasize. Although no doubt viewed by some today as a trivial or anachronistic annoyance, the Origination Clause was an integral part of the Framers’ blueprint for protecting the people from excessive federal taxation. It is true that the Framers’ decision to grant the Senate a broad amendment power gave the Origination Clause less bite than it otherwise might have had. But the Clause nonetheless has been important historically and remains vital in the modern legislative process. By newly exempting a substantial swath of tax legislation from the Origination Clause, the panel opinion degrades the House’s origination authority in a way contrary to the Constitution’s text and history, and contrary to congressional practice. As a result, the panel opinion upsets the longstanding balance of power between the House and the Senate regarding the initiation of tax legislation. Therefore, I would grant rehearing en banc. In my respectful view, the en banc Court should vacate the panel opinion and rule for the Government on the ground that the Affordable Care Act originated in the House and thereby complied with the Origination Clause.

… SEE MY RANT TO ALL OF THIS ABOVE !!~~Xaniel777 …

… AT ANY RATE, THIS JOKE OF A  JUDGE CONTINUES BUT YOU WILL HAVE TO

READ THE REST OF THIS STORY AT THE WASHINGTON POST

==================================================

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyper link is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House. ~~~ Xaniel777

Mad Max The Road Warrior 1a

 

“What??..ME WORRIED??…AHAHAAAAA…”

 ©2009 – 2015 DaniMartExtras,too

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

New Technology to Free Humanity

Posted by Xaniel777 on July 7, 2015

SOURCE: Scribd

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/270635111/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&show_recommendations=true

A New Technology To Free Humanity
This is the system described by Alekz and Mr. Keshe during the 68th Knowledge seeker workshop.

You can see the broadcast here:
www.keshefoundation.org/broadcast

Omega Quantum
Star Formation Reactors
http://keshefoundation.org/shop/product/view/5/146

The Peace Roadmap
http://keshefoundation.org/new-horizons/peace-roadmap

==================================================

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyper link is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House. ~~~ Xaniel777

Mad Max The Road Warrior 1a

 ©2009 – 2015 DaniMartExtras,too

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

You Will NOT Speak The Truth: A Zionist project to criminalize criticism of Israel

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 22, 2015

SOURCE: Redress Information & Analysis

Boycott Israel

By Lawrence Davidson – June 9, 2015

Some historical background

From the 1920s to the 1990s, the Zionists controlled the storyline in the West on the Israel-Palestine conflict. This meant that their version of history was the only version as far as most of the people in the West were concerned. Consequentially, they had an uncontested media field to label the Palestinians and their supporters as “terrorists” – the charge of anti-Semitism was not yet widely used. Also, as a consequence of their monopoly, the Zionists did not bother to engage in public debate.

Then, over the last 20 years the Zionists slowly lost their monopoly. In part, this was due to the fact that in 1993 the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) recognized Israel’s right to exist and renounced terrorism, and in the following years many of the Arab states made or offered peace. However, the Israelis did not respond in kind. In particular, they failed to respond in a fair and just way to US-sponsored peace efforts. Why so?

The answer to why the Israelis did not, in good faith, take up multiple historic opportunities to make peace with the Palestinians lies in the very nature of the Zionist movement. From its beginning, and certainly from the establishment of the state of Israel, Zionism has been driven by dreams of colonial expansion and religious exclusiveness. Each of these goals is seen as part of Zionism’s God-given mission, and they still prevail. Professor David Schulman of Hebrew University, writing in the New York Review of Books (23 April 2015), describes the consequences of this situation: “The Israeli electorate is still dominated by hyper-nationalist, in some cases proto-fascist, figures. It is no way inclined to make peace. It has given a clear mandate for policies… that will further deepen Israel’s colonial venture.” As a consequence, Israel’s credibility with an increasing number of people in the West has eroded.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Western Media – The Best Money Can Buy: Truth Has Been Murdered

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 21, 2015

SOURCE: RINF ALTERNATIVE NEWS

By Paul Craig Roberts

JUNE 19, 2015

washington-dc

(RINF) – The Obama regime and its neocon monsters and European vassals have resurrected a Nazi government and located it in Ukraine. Read this statement by Elena Bondarenko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament: http://slavyangrad.org/2015/04/18/statement-by-elena-bondarenko-peoples-deputy-of-verkhovna-rada-of-ukraine/

The Western media has created a fictional account of events in Ukraine. The coup organized by the Obama regime that overthrew the elected democratic government in Ukraine is never mentioned. The militias decked out in Nazi symbols are ignored. These militias are the principle source of the violence that has been inflicted on the Russian populations, resulting in the formation of the break-away republics. Instead of reporting this fact, the corrupt Western media delivers Washington’s propaganda that Russia has invaded and is annexing eastern and southern Ukraine. British and European politicians parrot Washington’s lies.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Somehow I’m Not Surprised: US, Israel are world’s two leading terrorist organizations: Analyst

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 21, 2015

SOURCE: PressTV

Jun 21, 2015 5:4AM

http://presstv.ir/Default/embed/416816

[IF VIDEO DOESN’T COME UP, SEE IT HERE]

American political commentator James Fetzer believes that the United States and Israel are undoubtedly the world’s “two leading terrorist organizations.”

“There really can be no serious doubt that the United States and Israel are the two leading terrorist organizations in the world which is the reason why the Department of State has to make incoherent claims” like the one that accuses Iran of supporting terrorists, Fetzer told Press TV on Saturday.

Fetzer was pointing to the annual report by the Department of State, which was published  on Friday. The report does not mention Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, which are widely believed to be the main supporters of terrorists in the Middle East. The US itself stands accused of financing and arming militants in the region.

“The United States created the ISIS (ISIL), the United States is sponsoring the ISIS, the United States has opposed the United Nations’ declaration that ISIS is a terrorist organization,” Fetzer said.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Perhaps We Should Sleep With One Eye Open: 7 Key Events That Are Going To Happen By The End Of September

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 13, 2015

SOURCE: End Of The American Dream

By Michael Snyder

June 11th, 2015

7 SignIs something really big about to happen?  For months, people have been pointing to the second half of this year for various reasons.  For some, the major concern is Jade Helm and the unprecedented movement of military vehicles and equipment that we have been witnessing all over the nation.  For others, the upcoming fourth blood moon and the end of the Shemitah cycle are extremely significant events.  Yet others are most concerned about political developments in Washington D.C. and at the United Nations.  To me, it does seem rather remarkable that we are seeing such a confluence of economic, political and spiritual events coming together during the second half of 2015.  So is all of this leading up to something?  Is our world about to change in a fundamental way?  Only time will tell.  The following are 7 key events that are going to happen by the end of September…

Late June/Early July – It is expected that this is when the U.S. Supreme Court will reveal their gay marriage decision.  Most believe that the court will rule that gay marriage is a constitutional right in all 50 states.  There are some that believe that this will be a major turning point for our nation.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Political Masters Think They Know Better Than Stupid Parents: CA Vaccine Bill Passes Health Committee, Heads to Full Assembly for Final Vote

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 12, 2015

SOURCE: The Daily Sheeple

By Lily Dane
The Daily Sheeple
June 10th, 2015


California is going full totalitarian, but is anyone surprised?

forced vaccination

The state’s controversial and tyrannical mandatory vaccine bill has jumped another hurdle on its path to becoming law.

Yesterday, California lawmakers approved the bill, which requires all schoolchildren be vaccinated before being permitted to attend public or PRIVATE schools unless they have a MEDICAL exemption.

That’s right: they are not going to allow religious or philosophical/personal belief exemptions to vaccinations any longer if this passes the full Assembly.

From the text of the bill:

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Time For Another Hard Truth: Palestinian Children Buried Alive By IDF

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 8, 2015

SOURCE: WAKE UP FROM YOUR SLUMBER ! – THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE

ORIGINAL SOURCE: Non-Televised Truth

IF VIDEO DOES NOT COME UP, GO HERE TO SEE IT: https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=769273379788436

Israel arrested 9,000 Palestinians last year, 700 of them children, many of children were buried alive by IDF secretly, location is unknown, no more details about this video .

A former Israeli military commander has told the #BBC that Palestinian youngsters are routinely ill-treated by Israeli soldiers while in custody, reports the BBC’ s Katya Adler from Jerusalem and the West Bank.

“You take the kid, you blindfold him, you handcuff him, he’s really shaking… Sometimes you cuff his legs too. Sometimes it cuts off the circulation.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

As If We Hadn’t Noticed: Only “Blue Lives” Really Matter

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 6, 2015

SOURCE: PRO LIBERTATE

My Photo

Originally Posted: Sunday, May 31, 2015

 
A weeping Brelo reacts to his acquittal.

When Cleveland Police Officer Michael Brelo mounted the hood of a Chevy Malibu and fired fifteen shots through the windshield, killing Timothy Russell and Melissa Williams, he behaved in an “unreasonable” and “unconstitutional” fashion. This was the testimony offered by W. Ken Katsaris, a nationally renowned expert witness on use-of-force issues, during Brelo’s bench trial for two counts of voluntary manslaughter

Brelo’s actions amounted to the execution-style murder of a terrified, unarmed couple whose vehicle had been immobilized following a 22-minute high-speed pursuit and a 137-round onslaught by police. This isn’t why Katsaris found Brelo’s behavior to be “unreasonable” or “unconstitutional.” 

The lives of the victims were not consequential in Katsaris’s constitutional calculations: Once the decision had been made to kill the Mundanes, the only relevant consideration was the safety of Officer Breloand his comrades on the scene.

By leaping on top of the hood of the car, Brelo was “taking action that is not trained, not recognized, not safe, and put all of the other officers in the vicinity of his becoming a victim and their [the other officers] having to attempt to now engage to save his life,” Katsaris testified before trial judge John P. O’Donnell. 

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Those Of Us Awake Already Knew: DOD Admits Supporting ISIS, Buffer Zones In Syria

Posted by Xaniel777 on May 25, 2015

SOURCE: Activist Post – Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Programming

By Brandon Turbeville

Monday, May 25, 2015

While the Western mainstream media and even independent gatekeepers like Noam Chomsky for years spread the lie that any suggestion that the United States and NATO were supporting ISIS was a “conspiracy theory,” recently uncovered and declassified documents from the Defense Intelligence Agency have proven the Western press and the likes of Chomsky wrong and, yet again, the so-called “conspiracy theorists” right.

This is because, on May 18, Judicial Watch published a selection of recently declassified documents that were obtained from the US Department of Defense and the US State Department as a result of a lawsuit filed against the US government. The lawsuit and most of the documents contained within the release revolved around the Benghazi scandal but a deeper look into the documents dating back to 2012 reveal an even bigger story – that the US and NATO have admitted in their own documents to supporting al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria and Iraq.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,136 other followers

%d bloggers like this: