DaniMartExtras, Too



Posted by Xaniel777 on January 8, 2012

TODAY”S NEWS : January 08, 2012

US Marine says Iraq war was one long atrocity

From PressTV

 Ex-Marine Ross Caputi says American soldiers should take “ownership” of the war in Iraq that was one long atrocity.

 It’s no wonder, he says, that so many returning soldiers are overwhelmed by guilt at what they have done, with a higher rate of suicides than in any previous American war.

 “People do not go home and want to kill themselves because they’ve been helping Iraqis,” says Ross Caputi. “They go home and want to kill themselves because they’ve committed atrocities.”

 Ross Caputi now campaigns for justice for the city of Fallujah, which as a Marine he helped to destroy in 2004, when thousands of civilians were killed and 200,000 driven from their homes. stopwar.org.uk


 According to a “scientific study of violent Iraqi deaths caused by the U.S.-led invasion” conducted by the Just Foreign Policy, nearly 1,500,000 Iraqis have lost their lives to the war. The number is at least 10 times greater than most estimates cited in the U.S. media.

 Iraq’s anti-corruption board revealed in December 2007 that there were five million Iraqi orphans as reported by official government statistics. Alternet.org

 Military suicides have increased since the start of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a Center for a New American Security Suicide report. In the fiscal year 2009 alone, 1,868 veterans of these wars have made suicide attempts, according to armytimes.com.

 The VA estimates that about 18 veterans commit suicide every day.

 In 2010, more than 134,000 people made calls to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. Of those callers, 61 percent identified themselves as veterans. News.medill


ALSO SEE THIS :  CIA Agent Exposes How Al-Qaeda Dosen’t Exist

YOU MAY AS WELL SEE THIS TOO : Turn in your neighbor for owning a gun….get $1000 REWARD in Newark, NJ


Netanyahu Revealed Israel’s Desired Borders

Posted by 

  at veteranstoday.com

Back in August of 2009 Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu made a statement which reveals Israel’s true intentions for where they want their borders. And it will mean many more years of war, suffering and bloodshed for the region, and for America, which finances and fights Israel’s wars, it means many more dead and wounded troops and more unnecessary spending of American tax dollars.

Netanyahu said, [Jerusalem] is not a settlement. It is the sovereign capital of the State of Israel. We have been building in Jerusalem for 3,000 years.”


This indicates Israelis believe their boarders should be the same as the ancient borders of Israel as described in their “holy” book the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. (It doesn’t matter if today’s Jews are or are not really the ancient Jews of the Bible since they are de facto the same.)

To get an idea of Israel’s intended future occupations that go way beyond Jerusalem and the West Bank, we need to know what the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament claims were Israel’s borders. The Zionist/Christian Pat Robertson laid it out for us in an article called The Land of Israel: A Gift

israel under solomon

This map of Israel’s borders under Solomon tells us Israel’s contunied expansion will mean continued wars and suffering.

From God. He writes in this article,

“I want to show you the extent of the land, because Solomon, the son of David who was living in 950 B.C. (that’s a long time ago), this was his territory. You go all the way up north to the Euphrates River which encompasses the better part of modern-day Syria. Solomon’s empire went up to the Euphrates River.

“And Tyre and Sidon and Megiddo. And they had the Via Maris which went from Damascus all the way down to Cairo. It went as far as the area down in Gaza. Just south of that there is a creek called the River of Egypt. Not the Nile. The Nile is further away. This is what they got and it came all the way down and there is Kadesh Barnea and the entrance to the Gulf of Aqaba. And it went up the Jordon River. This was the territory that God gave to Joshua.”

By Pat’s description we can plainly see that as Israel continues its illegal aggression into these new areas including Iraq, Syria, Jordan and Egypt, people and nations will resist their expansion and wars will follow. Since U.S. career politicians have entwined the U.S. so closely with the Jewish aggressor state, Israel’s wars are America’s wars.

Obama even went so far as to write to the chairman of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, Alan Solow, “All sides should understand that our commitment to Israel is unshakeable and that no wedge will be driven between us.” Obama and the traitors in Congress, with the exception of Ron Paul (that’s a major reason the kosher system won’t let him win), all believe in Israel, right or wrong!”

The security and expansion of the Jewish state is key to the neoconservative movement. That is why they started the war in Iraq and will probably start a war for Israel’s benefit in Iran. The father of the neoconservative movement, the Jew Leo Strauss, wrote many articles and gave many speeches in which he revealed his desire to have a world based on the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament.

In the forward to the very revealing and important book which is a collection of Strauss’ writings, Jewish Philosophy and the Crisis of Modernity, Kenneth Hart Green writes, “Strauss learned from Maimonides that religion is essential to any healthy political society, and certainly for the moral life of human beings. Over and above this, Maimonides convinced Strauss that Jewish religion, based on the Hebrew Bible, is most essential to ground a ‘genuine’ morality for almost every human being.”

Of course living in a society based on the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament would require Jews being supreme while the Gentiles serve them. To realize the extent to which the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament teaches they should reign supreme all we need to do is to take a look at Leviticus 25:44-46 which says that God said to the Hebrews/Jews, “Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.

Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour.” In other words, the “chosen ones” can keep Gentiles and our children as slaves and pass us down to their children as an inheritance!

I don’t know why Pat Robertson, John Hagee and other Gentiles don’t address this disgusting Bible teaching.  And believing God would say such things is a slap in the face to God. As Thomas Paine asked in his important thought provoking book on God, Deism, the Bible, etc., The Age of Reason, The Complete Edition (for Kindle version click here), “Is it because ye are sunk in the cruelty of superstition, or feel no interest in the honor of your Creator, that ye listen to the horrid tales of the Bible, or hear them with callous indifference?”

HERE’S A RELATED STORY OF INTEREST : Massive American Troop Build-Up in Israel: War With Iran on the Horizon?

Uploaded by on Jan 5, 2012

President Obama announced today that funding for the military will be cut back, but at the same time the US has sent thousands of US troops to Israel. The two countries are doing a joint exercise called “Austere Challenge 12.” The exercise is meant to develop defense systems and collaboration between American and Israeli forces. US officials have denied this is in retaliation to Iran’s war games and allege this was planned way in advance. Jamal Abdi, policy director for the National Iranian American Council, gives us his take on this US troop deployment.

Follow Liz on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LizWahl

BUT WAIT, IT GETS BETTER : Letters To Video rebel

From Video Rebel’s Blog

Posted on January 7, 2012

“The Red Cross stated flatly there were no gas chambers.” Where is there proof of this statement for starters. What of the people who were there and saw the gas chambers, the dead bodies, the ovens and the belching smokestacks but lived to tell the world their stories. I have heard from them.

In a Nov. 22, 1944 letter to U.S. State Department officials, the Red Cross said: “We had not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners. This corroborates a report which we had already received from other sources …”

The above letter is quoted from here:

Mr Wiesel I would Like To Ask You A Few Questions.


The Red Cross had unrestricted access each month to every German concentration camp including Auschwitz. They had inside men who reported to them in detail the activities at the camps. They never once mentioned gas chambers.

There were many witnesses who testified to gas chambers in Germany that we now know never existed. So why should we believe them any more than we believe Goldman Sachs, Ben Bernanke and Bernie Madoff?

The Germans captured 150,000 British soldiers. 150 of those men were engineers who worked at Auschwitz-Birkenau to maintain the manufacturing plants that processed Silesian coal to make gasoline for the German Army. These 150 men obviously had daily access throughout the camps but to date no person trying to prove the reality of a Holocaust at Auschwitz has called upon them to corroborate their stories. Can you explain why British POWs would not be called upon for their testimony?

A woman with a Jewish last name wrote:

You can’t be serious. It is time to grow up and take responsibility for understanding and taking care of our own messes – not living in some childlike dream state.

She did not like this:

2012 Timeline: Assets Seizure, Hyperinflation And Debt Slavery


To take responsibility for our own actions implies that we control our government and our press. Both are controlled by Jewish people acting as agents for Israel and for the Rothschild network of banks.

A case in point is 911. I cannot take control of the investigation of the murder of 3,000 Americans on 911 because I cannot say anything in the media. It is obvious that Israel did it. Nor can I say anything about Israel and the killing of 168 people in the bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building on 4-19-1995.

There is no taking of responsibility without power.

Perhaps you should read this:

Israel Shahak: The Laws Against Non-Jews In 2 Minutes


We live under Talmudic law which says it is permissible for Jews to rob the goyim as soon as the Jews get control of the government and the goyim have no legal recourse.

If this Jewish right to rob us blind is not taken away, then I fear Ernst Zundel might be right.

Video- Ernst Zundel: Jewish Voraciousness Will Create Weimar Like Conditions In America And A Final Solution For the Jews In The US


A rather famous web personality with a great voice who makes some of the best videos ever wrote this:

EXCELLENT piece Horseman… Kudos indeed.

Thanks for your kind words. Please take a look at this which I just posted.

The Charge Of The Light Brigade: What Can American Military Personnel Learn?


The final letter comes from a hard core Christian Zionist: What flavor Kool Aid are you all drinking?

50,000 American factories were sent overseas while its population was deliberately increased by 40 million.

30 trillion dollars was stolen from Americans by Israel and Wall Street.

When the dollar collapses, you will have no means of buying munitions, oil or anything else to defend your country. Besides, Iran is an ally of China, Russia and Pakistan so I do not believe they will sell you anything at all on credit in a rime of war.

When the dollar collapses, there will be nationwide food riots, race riots and no cities.

What is your plan? Call in a prayer request to reverend John Hagee for Jesus to save you?

Please confront the reality that your government despises you. Please read this:

The Bankers Want America To Lose World War III


I do not think God listens to prayers like these.

About horse237

I have decided to share two of the visions I had as a child. When I was eight, I had a vision of a future war that killed 99.5% of the world’s population. When I was 16 and living in the projects, I had a vision of my future. I was to live in complete obscurity until it came time to stop WW III. When I was about ten, I had read a bio of Nikita Khrushchev which said he survived Stalin by playing the bumbling fool an old Russian peasant trick. I decided to do the same as I had already learned that we did not live in a democracy. The other vision I had when I was in third grade was of the Mind of God and how it interacted in the creation of the world we see. I believe you and I were born at this time precisely so we would have an opportunity to stop this war. As for my personal info, I grew up on military bases and in housing projects. My legs atrophied from starvation as a child. My second step-father died in prison. I used to have to rub my skin to simulate human contact. They did not feed me when I was a child. I do not fight in their wars as an adult.


U.S. & Iran Obligated To Resolve Dispute Legally



From Op Ed News

By  (about the author) 

It may come as a surprise to Republican presidential candidates Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum but the U.S. is obligated under international law to the peaceful resolution of its grievance against Iran.

Santorum has criticized President Obama’s attempt to negotiate with Iran and, according to The Christian Science Monitor, “called for increased covert sabotage, bombings, and even arresting foreign scientists” working in Iran. Romney has called Iran “the greatest threat we face” and for pulverizing its nuclear facilities “through airstrikes and (to) make it very public we are doing just that.”

If the U.S. sought to prevail by military force, however, it would be in contravention of at least three historic treaties the U.S. has signed pledging itself to the peaceful resolution of disputes. As war fever sweeps Washington and the Republican candidates, save for Rep. Ron Paul, cry for war, it behooves Iran to initiate legal action.  

In this age of instantaneous communications, the whole world is watching to see if either nation will seize the diplomatic initiative, to see which truly prefers conversation to conflict. As members of the United Nations, both Iran and the U.S. are obligated to go to arbitration, not to come out shooting, a fact lost on the hawkish GOP politicians who seem unaware the American people have had a bellyful of war and want to prioritize a domestic agenda.

Both Iran and the U.S. are signatories of the Kellogg-Briand Peace Pact of 1928 which states, “The High Contracting Parties agree that the settlement or solution of all disputes or conflicts of whatever nature or of whatever origin they may be, which may arise among them, shall never be sought except by pacific means.”

To the contrary, “The United States has been illegally threatening war against Iran going back to the Bush Jr. Administration,” says international law authority Francis Boyle of the University of Illinois, Champaign, and author of ” Destroying World Order: U.S. Imperialism in the Middle East Before and After September 11″(Clarity Press).

Boyle reminds, “Article 2 of the United Nations Charter requires the pacific settlement of the international dispute between the United States and Iran.” The UN Charter, he adds, “sets up numerous procedures” for the U.S.-Iranian dispute while prohibiting “both the threat and use of force by the United States against Iran.”

Ditto for the Hague Convention of 1899, to which both nations are a party. That pact set up the Permanent Court of Arbitration(PCA) in The Hague and made it the duty of other signatories of that treaty to remind the aggrieved parties the Court is there for them.

The reason given by the U.S. for threatening Iran is alleged to be that Iran is developing a nuclear weapon in secret. This charge is made with a straight face even as the U.S. lavishes military aid on its ally Israel. Israel is said to have an arsenal of 200-300 nuclear bombs it refuses to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency  to inspect.

The spurious U.S. pretext for war flies in the face of U.S. aggression against Iran long before Iran began building the nuclear facilities it says are needed to expand electrical output. Past U.S. aggression had everything to do with Iran’s oil and nothing else.

It is indisputable that the CIA in 1953 overthrew by force and violence Iran’s democratic government, causing Iranians years of suffering under a savage, despotic regime. The CIA overthrow was prompted by Great Britain, peeved when Iran took over management of its own oil fields after years of being cheated by the British corporation to whom they were entrusted. That firm today is known as BP.

The U.S. also backed Iraqi despot Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Iran and supplied him with conventional weapons as well as illegal chemical and biological warfare agents responsible for the horrible killing and maiming of tens of thousands of Iranian troops. This was, in fact, by any reasoning, an act of war by the U.S. against Iran.

As peace activist David Swanson writes on OpEdNews January 6th: ” For the past decade, the United States has labeled Iran an evil nation, attacked and destroyed the other non-nuclear nation on the list of evil nations, designated part of Iran’s military a terrorist organization, falsely accused Iran of crimes including the attacks of 9-11, murdered Iranian scientists, funded opposition groups in Iran (including some the U.S. also designates as terrorist), flown drones over Iran, openly and illegally threatened to attack Iran, and built up military forces all around Iran’s borders, while imposing cruel sanctions on the country.”

This same U.S. that is threatening to Iran today has a long history of lying in order to justify its wars of aggression. It lied to invade Iraq by charging Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, when he did not. It lied in 1964 to justify its war in Viet Nam when it claimed the Vietnamese attacked a U.S. destroyer in the Gulf of Tonkin, when they did not.  And much of the U.S. public believes Washington lied about those responsible for the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington to justify the start of the war against Afghanistan. Aggressive nations relish a fight and the U.S. presently is doing just that in a half dozen countries in the Middle East and Africa.

This history is important because, by contrast, Iran has not started a war in approximately 300 years. Its defense budget of less than $8 billion a year is a tiny fraction of the U.S. warfare budget of nearly $1 trillion annually. (Describing Iran as America’s “gravest threat” reflects poorly on Romney’s foreign affairs smarts.)  In fact, Iran would commit national suicide if it launched an attack upon the U.S. or Israel.  The Pentagon’s annual budget is the largest in the world and, in fact, greater than the next 20 military powers combined.

Yet another measure of  Iran’s peaceful intent and America’s warlike posture is that Iran has no military bases outside of its own borders while the U.S. has over 800 bases around the world from Okinawa to Diego Garcia, frequently established against the will of the local inhabitants. More than 40 U.S. bases are located in six nations that encircle Iran, from which the Pentagon is poised to attack.



( Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~ Xaniel777



Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: