DaniMartExtras, Too



Posted by Xaniel777 on January 16, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : January 16, 2012

US, Israel Split on Iran? Joint Military Drill Cancelled

{ XANIEL’S NOTE : Is it possible that more reasonable minds are re-thinking all this foolishness with Iran? Or is this just another of their famous  distractions so they can accomplish they agenda from another direction ? AND WHEN I SAY ANOTHER DIRECTION, I MEAN BUYING MORE TIME FOR THEMSELVES TO SET UP THE PERFECT FALSE-FLAG OPERATION THAT THEY CAN BLAME ON IRAN THERE BY JUSTIFYING TO  THE WORLD THE VERY ATTACK THEY WANTED ALL ALONG ! Leave no doubt in your minds that any major event that occurs, will be at the hands of the U.S. and Zionist Israel, who have demonstrated many times ( example : 911 ) that they will kill innocent people ( in many cases their own people ) to get what they want, while playing the victim card to the U.N. and the world. }~~ Xaniel777 


From Common Dreams

Netanyahu deputy voices ‘disappointment’ with Obama on Iran – Common Dreams staff 

A US Navy sailor stands on a destroyer docked at the Israeli Mediterranean port of Haifa, as part of a joint exercise between the US and the Israeli Navy in 2009. Joint US-Israel war games planned for this spring simulating war with Iran have apparently been cancelled, according to multiple news agencies in Israel Sunday. (AFP Photo/Atef Safadi)

Joint US-Israel war games planned for this spring simulating war with Iran have apparently been cancelled, according to multiple news agencies in Israel Sunday.

Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, is scheduled for talks in Israel this week, Israel said Sunday, at a time when the United States is concerned that Israel might be preparing to attack Iran over its nuclear program.

UPDATE: Agence France-Presse is now reporting:

Israel and the United States have agreed to postpone a major military defence exercise scheduled for spring, a senior security official said Sunday, amid rising regional tension over Iran’s nuclear program.

“Israel and the United States have agreed to postpone the maneuvre planned for spring,” the official said on condition of anonymity.

“The exercises will take place between now and the end of 2012,” the official added, without elaborating.

Earlier, public radio said the “Austere Challenge 12” exercise would be pushed back to the end of 2012 over unspecified budgetary concerns, citing military sources.

Army radio, citing a defence official, said it was being postponed to avoid “unnecessary headlines in such a tense period.”[…]

The postponement appeared to suggest fears the exercise could dangerously ramp up regional tensions, at a time when Iran has already threatened to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz — a choke-point for one fifth of the world’s traded oil — in the event of a military strike or severe tightening of international sanctions over its nuclear program.

DEBKAfile, the Jerusalem-based English language Israeli military intelligence website, is reporting:

US-Israeli discord over action against Iran went into overdrive Sunday, Jan. 15 when the White House called off Austere Challenge 12, the biggest joint war game the US and Israel have ever staged, ready to go in spring, in reprisal for a comment by Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon in an early morning radio interview. He said the United States was hesitant over sanctions against Iran’s central bank and oil for fear of a spike in oil prices.

The row between Washington and Jerusalem is now in the open, undoubtedly causing celebration in Tehran.

Nothing was said about the 9,000 US troops who landed in Israeli earlier this month for a lengthy stay. Neither was the forthcoming visit by Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint US Chiefs of Staff.

The exercise was officially postponed from spring 2012 to the last quarter of the year over “budgetary constraints” – an obvious diplomatic locution for cancellation.  It was issued urgently at an unusually early hour Washington time, say Debka’s sources, to underscore the Obama administration’s total disassociation from any preparations to strike Iran and to stress its position that if an attack took place, Israel alone would be accountable.

Israel’s Deputy Prime minister further inflamed one of the most acute disagreements in the history of US-Israeli relations over the Obama administration’s objections to an Israel military action against Iran’s nuclear sites in any shape or form. Yaalon ventured into tricky terrain when he pointed out that US Congress had shown resolve by enacting legislation for sanctions with real bite. But the White House “hesitated.” He went on to say: “A military operation is the last resort, but Israel must be ready to defend itself.”

The friction was already fueled last week by the deep resentment aroused in Israel by Washington’s harsh condemnation of the assassination last Wednesday, Jan. 11, of the nuclear scientist Prof. Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan, and absolute denial of any US involvement.

Although Tehran has since accused the United States of the attack, the White House treated it as the defiant sign of an approaching unilateral Israeli military operation against Iran to which the administration is adamantly opposed.

The Jerusalem Post is reporting Sunday:

Israel and the US are in talks about the possibility of canceling a missile defense drill, billed as the largest ever in the country’s history, planned for the spring.

Initially scheduled for April and called “Austere Challenge,” the drill was supposed to see the deployment of thousands of US troops and various sophisticated US military equipment in Israel.

In recent weeks, Defense Minister Ehud Barak’s office has held talks with the Pentagon about the possibility of canceling the drill.

Senior military officers told The Jerusalem Post that the drill scheduled for April has been canceled, while defense officials said that it was possible that it would be held later in 2012.

The drill, expected to involve the deployment of thousands of US troops in Israel, was scheduled to last around a week and mark the first time that a top US military commander would participate in the simulations.

* * *

Meanwhile, Israel’s Ha’aretz reports:

A senior Israeli official voiced disappointment in the Obama administration on Sunday, saying “election-year considerations” lay behind its caution over tough Iran sanctions sought by U.S. legislators.

While Washington has been talking tougher about Iran’s nuclear work and threat to block oil export routes out of the Gulf if hit with harsher sanctions, new U.S. measures adopted on Dec. 31 gave President Barak Obama leeway on the scope of penalties on the Iranian central bank and oil exports.[…]

The remarks by Ya’alon, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party, appeared to jar with praise centrist Defense Minister Ehud Barak offered last month for what he described as Obama’s resolve against Iran.

Running for re-election in the face of Republicans who hold sway over big pro-Israel constituencies, Obama has sought to burnish his credentials as a friend of the Jewish state despite having frosty relations with Netanyahu.


Ex-Israeli Intelligence Officer: “Pearl Harbor” Style Attack Will Be Pretext For War On Iran


Keep your nose to the ground and your eyes to the sky.

Posted: January 14, 2012 in Government ConspiracyInfoWarsNew World OrderNews Articles,Nuclear HolocaustPolice StateSurvivalWW3

Jerusalem Post article implies US will stage provocation to justify military assault

Paul Joseph Watson
Friday, January 13, 2012

Former Israeli intelligence officer Avi Perry writes that a “surprise” Pearl Harbor-style Iranian attack on an American warship in the Persian Gulf will provide the pretext for the US to launch all-out warfare against Iran.

Given the fact that former Vice President Dick Cheney’s office openly considered staging a false flag attack on a US vessel in the Persian Gulf to blame it on Iran as a pretext for war, Perry’s summation of how “2012 will see to a new war,” cannot be taken lightly.

Under the headline ‘The looming war with Iran‘, Perry writes;

Iran, just like Nazi Germany in the 1940s, will take the initiative and “help” the US president and the American public make up their mind by making the first move, by attacking a US aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf.

The Iranian attack on an American military vessel will serve as a justification and a pretext for a retaliatory move by the US military against the Iranian regime. The target would not be Iran’s nuclear facilities. The US would retaliate by attacking Iran’s navy, their military installations, missile silos, airfields. The US would target Iran’s ability to retaliate, to close down the Strait of Hormuz. The US would then follow by targeting the regime itself.

Elimination of Iran’s nuclear facilities? Yes. This part would turn out to be the final act, the grand finale. It might have been the major target, had the US initiated the attack. However, under this “Pearl Harbor” scenario, in which Iran had launched a “surprise” attack on the US navy, the US would have the perfect rationalization to finish them off, to put an end to this ugly game.

Perry’s use of quotation marks around the word “surprise” comes across as a literary device to imply that the so-called “surprise” attack will not be a surprise at all.

Of course, the Pearl Harbor attack, which provided the pretext for America’s formal entry into World War Two, was not a “surprise” by any means, it was known well ahead of time.

Released Freedom of Information Act files prove that weeks before the December 7 attack by the Japanese, the United States Navy had intercepted eighty-three messages from Admiral Yamamoto which gave them details of precisely when and where the attack would take place.

It’s also completely nonsensical that Iran would actively seek to provide the world’s pre-eminent nuclear superpower with an easy excuse to justify an attack by deliberately targeting US warships in the Persian Gulf. Perry’s article seems to be a tongue-in-cheek admission that the US or Israel will manufacture such an attack.

This presumption need not delve into the murky realm of conspiracy theories – history tells us that fake naval attacks have been staged on numerous occasions to hoodwink the American people into supporting wars of aggression.

Remember the Maine? The battleship USS Maine blew up while it was stationed in Havana harbor in February 1898. Although a Navy investigation could not find the cause of the explosion, the American media, led by pioneer of “yellow journalism” William Randolph Hearst, immediately blamed Spanish saboteurs, whipping the public into a war fever.

When Hearst sent his reporter Frederick Remington to investigate, little of note could be established about the disaster. When Remington asked to be recalled, Hearst told him, “Please remain. You furnish the pictures, I’ll furnish the war.”

“Hundreds of editorials demanded that the Maine and American honor be avenged. Many Americans agreed. Soon a rallying cry could be heard everywhere — in the papers, on the streets, and in the halls of Congress: “Remember the Maine! To hell with Spain.”

As a result of an incident that many consider to either be an accident or a deliberate false flag attack by the US on its own ship, the US was at war with Spain within months.

Over 60 years later, another staged naval event, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, was used as a pretext for the United States to launch the Vietnam war.

President Johnson told the American public that North Vietnamese torpedo boats launched an “unprovoked attack” against a U.S. destroyer on “routine patrol” in the Tonkin Gulf. Leaked cables and recordings of White House telephone conversations later proved that the incident was completely manufactured, and that “our destroyers were just shooting at phantom targets — there were no PT boats there,” according to Navy squadron commander James Stockdale, who was flying over the scene that night.

There was almost a 21st century version mirror of the Gulf of Tonkin incident in January 2008, when the US government announced that it had been “moments” away from opening fire on a group of Iranian patrol boats in the Strait of Hormuz after the boats allegedly broadcast a warning that they were about to attack a US vessel.

The Iranian warning later turned out to be of dubious origin, but the incident led to a discussion in Vice-President Dick Cheney’s office about how to start a war with Iran by launching a false flag attack at sea, according to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh.

The January 2008 Strait of Hormuz incident taught Cheney and other administration insiders that, “If you get the right incident, the American public will support it”. Hersh said: “There were a dozen ideas proffered about how to trigger a war. The one that interested me the most was why don’t we build, we in ‘our shipyard’, – build four or five boats that look like Iranian PT boats. Put Navy seals on them with a lot of arms. And next time one of our boats goes to the Straits of Hormuz, start a shoot-up. Might cost some lives”.

Given the dangerous nature of overlapping Iranian and US/Israeli naval drills set to take place in the same region at some point within the next two weeks, the potential for another staged incident at sea that will be exploited as a pretext for war remains a potent threat.


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.

Source Article Link: http://www.infowars.com/ex-israeli-intelligence-officer-pearl-harbor-style-attack-will-be-pretext-for-war-on-iran/



Bernanke is Going To Do It Again: Here Comes A Third Round (Q3) of Money Printing and Monetizing of the Debt


From Scotty Starnes’s Blog

Bernanke told Congress The Federal Reserve would not monetize the debt. This would be the 3rd time and still no perjury charges have been filed. This is being done to keep the economic numbers from tanking thanks to Obama’s Keynesian spending.

CNBC reports:

Federal Reserve officials are seriously considering giving the US economy—and especially the housing market—an added jolt with more quantitative easing.

Fed officials are likely to discuss such a move at their Jan. 24-25 meeting, when the central bank [cnbc explains] will issue its first quarterly forecast on interest rates under the new communication policy.

Two of the new voting members this year on the Federal Open Market Committee[cnbc explains] , which sets interest-rate policy, have recently suggested they would support more assets purchases.

San Francisco Fed President John Williams said that sustained high levels of unemployment, as forecast by many Fed members, “does make an argument that we should have more stimulus.”

Another new voter, Cleveland Fed President Sandra Pianalto, said in a recent speech that economic models indicate the Fed “should be even more accommodative than it is today.”

They join other members, including New York Fed President Bill Dudley and several Fed governors, who have openly suggested they would support more QE.

Continue reading>>>


‘Time to Fight’ – Montana Voters Move To Recall Senators Who Voted For NDAA

From disinformation

Posted by Good German on January 9, 2012

Gen. Smedley Butler

 Gen. Smedley Butler

Jonathan Turley writes:

We have been discussing the disconnect between citizens who have repeatedly opposed continued rollbacks of civil liberties and the Democratic and Republican leadership pushing for such rollbacks, including the recent provision allowing indefinite detention of citizens under the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 (NDAA). Now Montana citizens have decided to try another approach given the non-responsive attitude of our leaders — they are moving to remove their two Senators from office over their votes in favor of indefinite detention powers.

Montana is one of nine states with recall laws. The other states are Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, and Wisconsin. Eighteen states have recall laws, but most do not apply to federal officers.

Montana Code 2-16-603, on the grounds of physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of certain felony offenses.

Presumably, they are arguing that voting for an unconstitutional measure that allows for indefinite detention of citizens constitutes both a violation of the oath of office and incompetence…

Source: Daily Kos

[continues at Jonathan Turleys blog]

In the Daily Kos post, Stewart Rhodes, one of the leaders of the movement, is quoted as saying:

Two time Medal of Honor winner Marine General Smedley Butler once said “There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights.” Time to fight.


US Soldier Says He Was ‘Told to Lie’ About Iraqi Killings

ALSO FROM  disinformation

Posted by Good German on January 15, 2012

A picture taken at the scene of the Haditha killings shows several dead Iraqis who were killed by Marines.

A picture taken at the scene of the Haditha killings shows several dead Iraqis who were killed by Marines.

Have they always taught soldiers to piss on dead people, or was it a special directive Cheney and Rumsfeld came up with?  Via Al Jazeera English:

A US soldier has told a military jury in California how his commander killed five Iraqi civilians in the western al-Anbar province in 2005 and then asked him to lie about it.

At a trial stemming from one of the Iraq war’s most controversial episodes, Sergeant Sanick Dela Cruz testified on Wednesday, the third day of Staff Sergeant Frank Wuterich’s court martial.

Wuterich was Dela Cruz’s squad leader, who Dela Cruz said gunned down the Iraqis after they pulled up in a car near the scene of a bombing in which a US marine had died.

In all, 24 Iraqi civilians including women and children were killed in the revenge attacks – 19 in several houses along with the five men who pulled up in a car in the town of Haditha on November 19, 2005.

Victims unarmed

At the military trial in Camp Pendleton, California, Dela Cruz told prosecutor Lieutenant Colonel Sean Sullivan that he saw the men outside the car on the side of the road.

He testified that the Iraqis did not appear to have any weapons and were not making any quick moves toward the car. He said he then saw a man drop to the ground.”That’s when I saw Staff Sergeant Wuterich kneeling with his gun aimed at the Iraqi. He was by the road holding the weapon in a firing position,” said Dela Cruz, demonstrating that position in the courtroom.

He said he could not recall how many gunshots he had heard. Dela Cruz also said that when he looked back in the direction of the car he did not see any of the men anymore.

“I run through there and crouched on the side of the vehicle. I saw four to five Iraqis dead near the trunk area of the car,” he said.

“I saw Sergeant Wuterich approach the bodies, he shot at them,” said Dela Cruz, adding that Wuterich went around to each corpse and shot it in the upper body from close range.

Revenge killings

“Sergeant Wuterich approached me and told me if anyone asks, the Iraqis were running away from the car and the Iraqi army shot them,” Dela Cruz said.

Dela Cruz, a veteran of three combat deployments, said he later urinated on the mangled head of one of the bodies, adding that he was “regretful” of his actions.

“I was pissed, sir, about what happened (the bombing),” he said…

Read more here.


Mossad´s Deep Throats blare Murder at Teheran.

          From nsnbc
– no spin news – english

Posted on January 14, 2012

Though both official US and Israeli representatives deny that the countries have anything to do with the bomb blast that murdered the Iranian nuclear scientist Ahmadi Roshan on Wednesday 11 January. When the deep state converses it is rare that statements are made that could actually make criminals libel for their homicides.

The language of state sanctioned homicide and terrorism is more subtle than that, and yet, the messages are as clear as laughing the victims straight into their faces shouting we did it, we´ll do it again, and there´s nothing you can do about it. The intimidation often works, but with respect to Iran the wolf pack´s of Imperialism may very well be biting into the flesh of a state with bones of steel, and they may break their teeth in the attempt to rip it apart.

So how does the Zionist and Imperialist deep state boast his homicides ?  Richard Silverstein, the so called “thinker” is one of the individuals through which the Zionist State often makes unofficial announcements. In his blogg Tikun-Olam, Silverstein boasts my own confidential Israeli source confirms that todays murder was the work of Mossad and the MEK. (1)

Another way of blasting confessions of terrorism and homicide straight into the face of Teheran is by making use of the Neo-Con / Zionist FOX News, when it suddenly can report about what has happened in a close session of the Knesset´s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee.

On 11 January, the day of the homicide on Roshani, FOX reported, that testimony by Lt.Gen. Benny Gantz to a closed parliamentary committee on Tuesday informed the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that 2012 is expected to be a critical year for Iran, and that the confluence of efforts to advance the nuclear program, internal leadership changes, continued international pressure and things that happen to it unnaturally.

According to FOX the testimony by Gantz was leaked by a meeting participant who spoke on condition of anonymity because the testimony was closed. FOX continues by informing that Israeli Officials have spoken somewhat giddily of the “unnatural” setbacks that have plagued Iran´s nuclear program. (2)

Back to the basics then. Every news analyst, intelligence analyst, every security expert, and for that sake everyone with basic experience in international politics and diplomacy will willingly confirm the deep relationship between the media and intelligence communities. The deep state is talking through the media, as it wants, what it wants to, and when.

Real whistle blowers are a rare and threatened species and they are not to be confused with Alphabet Soup Deep throats. One just has to listen carefully and distinguish the chatter from the marrow, to be aware of what function which “news” are supposed to fulfill. The US-Alphabeth Agencies and the Mossad are well aware of the fact that murdering single Iranian nuclear scientists, even “key nuclear scientists” can hardly stop the nuclear program of Iran. So what function does the terrorism and what function do the homicides have?

What function can the blaring out of we did it, and there´s nothing you can do about it into the face of Teheran have ?

The only realistic functions the terrorism and the homicides can possibly have are functions of psychological warfare, aiming at the following primary objectives.

To create a sense of vulnerability and create stress among scientists as well as the population. To provide a focal point for US- and Israeli supported terrorist networks and opposition.

To provoke Iran into a response that would provide a pretext for an Israeli attack on Iran´s nuclear facilities, effectively starting the wider Middle-Eastern War both Washington and Tel-Aviv are preparing. (3)

The homicide on Roshani is most likely nothing but one more provocation that is supposed to coax Iran into a reaction that would make it more easy for US- Israeli, and European politicians to sale their populations a narrative in style with we had to wage a pre-emptive war now, before it would have been too late

What is not reported is that Israel is the sole nation in the Middle-East that possess nuclear weapons and that it has threatened with making use of them. The murder of Roshani is a stark reminder of the crimes that were committed against Iraq under the pretext of Weapons of Mass Destruction “.

Crimes that continue to maim and murder children like those in Fallujah. (4)

Dr. Christof Lehmann


1) Tikun-Olam, Richard Silverstein. http://www.richardsilverstein.com/

2) FOX News – 11.01.2012. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/01/11/israeli-military-chief-hints-at-anti-iran-activity/#ixzz1jBuHGFXU

3) Wider Middle-East and Global War Imminent ?.http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/wider-middle-east-and-global-war-imminent/

4) US Uranium to blame for babies in Fallujah.http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/us-uranium-to-blame-for-babies-in-fallujah/


False Flag

From Foreign Policy


Buried deep in the archives of America’s intelligence services are a series of memos, written during the last years of President George W. Bush’s administration, that describe how Israeli Mossad officers recruited operatives belonging to the terrorist group Jundallah by passing themselves off as American agents.

According to two U.S. intelligence officials, the Israelis, flush with American dollars and toting U.S. passports, posed as CIA officers in recruiting Jundallah operatives — what is commonly referred to as a “false flag” operation.

The memos, as described by the sources, one of whom has read them and another who is intimately familiar with the case, investigated and debunked reports from 2007 and 2008 accusing the CIA, at the direction of the White House, of covertly supporting Jundallah — a Pakistan-based Sunni extremist organization. Jundallah, according to the U.S. government and published reports, is responsible for assassinating Iranian government officials and killing Iranian women and children.

But while the memos show that the United States had barred even the most incidental contact with Jundallah, according to both intelligence officers, the same was not true for Israel’s Mossad. The memos also detail CIA field reports saying that Israel’s recruiting activities occurred under the nose of U.S. intelligence officers, most notably in London, the capital of one of Israel’s ostensible allies, where Mossad officers posing as CIA operatives met with Jundallah officials.

The officials did not know whether the Israeli program to recruit and use Jundallah is ongoing. Nevertheless, they were stunned by the brazenness of the Mossad’s efforts.

“It’s amazing what the Israelis thought they could get away with,” the intelligence officer said. “Their recruitment activities were nearly in the open. They apparently didn’t give a damn what we thought.”

Interviews with six currently serving or recently retired intelligence officers over the last 18 months have helped to fill in the blanks of the Israeli false-flag operation. In addition to the two currently serving U.S. intelligence officers, the existence of the Israeli false-flag operation was confirmed to me by four retired intelligence officers who have served in the CIA or have monitored Israeli intelligence operations from senior positions inside the U.S. government.

The CIA and the White House were both asked for comment on this story. By the time this story went to press, they had not responded. The Israeli intelligence services — the Mossad — were also contacted, in writing and by telephone, but failed to respond. As a policy, Israel does not confirm or deny its involvement in intelligence operations.

There is no denying that there is a covert, bloody, and ongoing campaign aimed at stopping Iran’s nuclear program, though no evidence has emerged connecting recent acts of sabotage and killings inside Iran to Jundallah. Many reports have cited Israel as the architect of this covert campaign, which claimed its latest victim on Jan. 11 when a motorcyclist in Tehran slipped a magnetic explosive device under the car of Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, a young Iranian nuclear scientist. The explosion killed Roshan, making him the fourth scientist assassinated in the past two years. The United States adamantly denies it is behind these killings.

According to one retired CIA officer, information about the false-flag operation was reported up the U.S. intelligence chain of command. It reached CIA Director of Operations Stephen Kappes, his deputy Michael Sulick, and the head of the Counterintelligence Center. All three of these officials are now retired. The Counterintelligence Center, according to its website, is tasked with investigating “threats posed by foreign intelligence services.”

The report then made its way to the White House, according to the currently serving U.S. intelligence officer. The officer said that Bush “went absolutely ballistic” when briefed on its contents.

“The report sparked White House concerns that Israel’s program was putting Americans at risk,” the intelligence officer told me. “There’s no question that the U.S. has cooperated with Israel in intelligence-gathering operations against the Iranians, but this was different. No matter what anyone thinks, we’re not in the business of assassinating Iranian officials or killing Iranian civilians.”

Israel’s relationship with Jundallah continued to roil the Bush administration until the day it left office, this same intelligence officer noted. Israel’s activities jeopardized the administration’s fragile relationship with Pakistan, which was coming under intense pressure from Iran to crack down on Jundallah. It also undermined U.S. claims that it would never fight terror with terror, and invited attacks in kind on U.S. personnel.



Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~ Xaniel777



Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: