DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

REAL NEWS March 14

Posted by Xaniel777 on March 14, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : March 14, 2012

——————————————–

 

 

 

 It is time to storm the Bastille, vive la revolution

 

From Benjamin Fulford Blog

March 12, 2012

The financial war that has been raging intensively at least since 2001 may be finally ending. This week a three pronged effort to convince the Luciferian banking cabal to surrender is being carried out. In one prong, the Chinese government has announced it will start the mass installation of wind and solar power devices on rooftops world-wide in order to free humanity from the cabal controlled energy grid.

In another prong, the cabal controlled central banks will be asked to make good on broken promises by redeeming financial instruments backed by gold stolen from holocaust victims during World War 3. The third prong is still being kept secret but essentially it is a promise to start a bottom-up revolution in cabal controlled countries like Italy, France, Germany, the UK and the US unless these countries stop their ceaseless war-mongering.

The arrest of Bill Gates, the announcement in an Italian paper that the pope will resign on April 15th, and the presence of a US marshal accompanying cabal operatives like Timothy Geithner are all signs that very little, if any, opposition remains.

 Become a member to finish reading full story at : Weekly Geopolitical News and Analys

END

 

The Criminal Plot to Stop Ron Paul

 

From Poor Richard’s Blog

March 13, 2012

bollyn.com

Added introduction comments on Zionist strategy to stop Ron Paul and re-elect Obama by splitting the Republican base with spoiler candidates.

The Zionist gangsters funding Mitt Romney and his supposed rival Newt Gingrich are part of a bigger strategy to get Barack Obama re-elected and prevent Ron Paul from winning the Republican nomination and the presidency.  This is basically the same tactic that these same Zionist forces used to get Obama elected to office in Illinois and the U.S. Senate.  In every election that Obama ran for office in Illinois the opposition candidate was effectively destroyed before the election so that there was no real opponent running against him.  Ron Paul would win the presidency if he were to face Obama in the general election in November.  This is why the Zionists are pouring money and favorable press on Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum.  They need to stop Paul so Obama will win.  It’s a conspiracy to stop Paul.

The following video from Maine shows how caucuses and primaries are being stolen from Ron Paul across the nation.  The crimocracy is pulling out all the stops to prevent Ron Paul from winning in any state.  What the criminals don’t realize is that the supporters of Ron Paul outnumber them 10,000 to 1.  The fact that this egregious vote fraud is being done against one of the most popular presidential candidates in many years will help bring the corruption of American elections into the spotlight.


THE CRIMINAL FUNDING OF NEWT GINGRICH – The casino company run by Sheldon Adelson (left), the principal financial backer of Newt Gingrich’s presidential bid, has been under criminal investigation for the last year by the Department of Justice and the Securities Exchange Commission for alleged bribery of foreign officials, according to corporate documents.
– “Bribes, Chinese Mob Ties Alleged at Casino of Gingrich Money Man” , ABC News, 27 January 2012


20 January 2012 – Ron Paul speaks at a rally in Greenville, S.C. the day before the primary.  Paul, who has energized the Republican party and the youth vote, drew a large crowd of several hundred despite heavy rain and frigid temperatures, according to the AP.  Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, had to cancel a major campaign stop in Charleston because nobody came.  With so little popular support how could Gingrich have possibly won the South Carolina primary?  Is this yet another case of vote fraud by electronic voting machines?  Photo: The Washington Post

But, now, how on earth could Newt Gingrich win the South Carolina primary when the day before the vote he had to cancel a major campaign stop because of lack of attendance?
– “There’s something very odd about GOP primary pre-polling and vote” by Eric Blair, 22 January 2012

I just found your site and read your book ( Solving 9/11 )… As I was reading your book I was struck how the Zionists must hate Ron Paul. This would explain why he faces such intense media bias. The other thought I had was that his proximity to winning the White House is directly proportional to his assassination.
– C.H. in Illinois


South Carolinians voting on ES&S voting machines in the presidential primary on January 21, 2012. According to the tally produced by the privately-owned voting machine company ES&S, Ron Paul came in last place behind three Big Government Zionist-funded candidates who support war against Iran. Surprise, surprise.

Ron Paul, a popular Southern conservative who supports states’ rights, supposedly came in fourth place in the South Carolina Republican primary on Saturday, January 21.  The winner, according to the tally produced by the privately-owned voting machine company ES&S, was Newt Gingrich.  Gingrich is supported by Sheldon Adelson, the Zionist casino billionaire who supports the most extreme hard-liners in the right-wing Likud in Israel.

Adelson also finances the Lubavitcher cult, according to a 2003 report in Executive Intelligence Review which explains how “the Lubavitchers operate a right-wing political and dirty-money empire from Russia to New York’s diamond district, to Israel.”


Sheldon Adelson (left) is the hard-line Zionist billionaire who is bankrolling the Gingrich campaign.  Here Adelson, a global casino owner, talks with the Israeli president Shimon Peres.

In recent years Gingrich has received at least $17 million in political contributions from Adelson and his Israeli wife, Miriam, including $10 million that went to a “super PAC” supporting him in January 2012.  Adelson made an initial $5 million contribution to Winning Our Future, a pro-Gingrich super PAC, shortly before the South Carolina primary.  In an article entitled “The Man Behind Gingrich’s Money”, the New York Timesreported that Adelson’s support was “pivotal in Mr. Gingrich’s victory” in South Carolina.  The same article from 28 January 2012 reported that Adelson has frequently lent his Gulfstream jet to Gingrich for cross-country trips, according to a former Gingrich adviser.

The Gingrich campaign received a $5 million donation from Sheldon Adelson the week before he “won” the South Carolina primary.  Gingrich calls the indigenous Palestinian population an “invented” people and supports Israel’s right to attack Iran as “self defense”.  Gingrich told CNN he would help Israel attack Iran and would move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem on his first day in office by executive order.  These are the hard-line positions Adelson is paying Gingrich to espouse.


“Adelson uses his money to abuse or anoint Israeli prime ministers and American presidents (Gingrich versus Obama).”  Source – “Is Gingrich’s Hard Line on Palestine Paid for by Sheldon Adelson?”


Las Vegas casino owner Sheldon Adelson (left) is a close friend and supporter of Benjamin Netanyahu of the right-wing Likud.  Netanyahu is one of the suspected planners of the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and a friend of Newt Gingrich.

THE ZIONIST PLOT TO STOP RON PAUL

Mitt Romney is supported by the Crown family of Chicago, a Zionist family that is closely connected to Israeli military intelligence.  Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, is supported by Sheldon Adelson, a Zionist billionaire who works closely with the same people.  Are these different factions or is this a Zionist plot that has the same goal?

The Zionist strategy is to stop the very popular conservative Ron Paul.  Because there is obviously no candidate that can beat Paul in popularity or on the issues, the Zionists are supporting a slew of venal candidates in order to steal as many votes as possible from Paul.  These candidates are essentially a gang of Zionist-funded candidates who form the anti-Paul coalition.  Using privately-owned and controlled electronic voting systems like ES&S, the South Carolina primary shows how the Zionists plan to block Ron Paul from being the Republican nominee.

From this event, one can state as fact – not theory, that Israel and its supporters in the US are actively working to derail Ron Paul’s race towards the GOP nomination, and the Presidency. This fact alone, should be cause for alarm from even the most moderate of public corridors.  Should a foreign country, in this case Israel, be allowed to buy a significant influence through the media in American democratic elections?  Should candidates be allowed to accept donations – even indirectly, from foreign interest PACs or agents thereof, thus creating a serious conflict of interest, and threat to national security?
– “Israeli Lobby launch new Super PAC effort to bring down Ron Paul” , by Patrick Henningsen, Global Research, 21 January 2012

WHO STOLE THE IOWA CAUCUS?

After two weeks, the Republican Party of Iowa released its certified tally of the January 3 caucus.  The certified final tally released on January 18 indicates that Mitt Romney did not win the Iowa caucus and that the results had been manipulated to give Romney the important first victory.  The scale of the fraud in the Iowa caucus is so large that it suggests that there was a hidden hand manipulating the data from across the state as it was sent to party headquarters to give the victory to Romney.  This suggests that the people behind Romney are likely to be the people behind the vote fraud, i.e. Lester Crown, Israeli intelligence, and the Zionist Fifth Column in the United States.

I spoke to Ryan Gough, the 24-year-old Organization Director for the Republican Party of Iowa on January 20.  I asked him how there could be so many mistakes in so many precincts.  The Des Moines Register, for example, reported that “typographical errors in tabulations” for two Fayette County precincts resulted in an inflated vote for Romney, who was initially reported to have carried the county by 67 votes. The final count showed Santorum carrying the county by 36 votes.  Romney was reported to have won the caucus by only 8 votes on January 3.  This was false.

There were similar problems in 131 precincts with double-digit errors in 51 precincts.  In spite of the wrong candidate having been declared the winner, Gough defended the caucus, which he called a “volunteer-driven process” in which typographical errors had occurred across the state to benefit Mitt Romney.  I don’t buy it.

I reminded Gough that we had spoken a week before the primary and that he had told me that the way in which that precincts would communicate the results to caucus headquarters in Des Moines was being kept secret for security purposes.  Now that the caucus was over, I asked, could he tell me how this was done.  Gough said that a phone and computer system had been used but he had not gone into detail.  When I asked if the telephonic system had been voice-to-voice, he said it was.

MYSTERY TELECOM
I then asked Gough if any outside agency had been involved in the tally of the results on January 3.  He asked me what I meant and I told him that the Democratic Party of Iowa had used a telephonic tally system based in Florida called Voxeo in 2004 and 2008.  I had been told by Nicole Sizemore of the GOP of Iowa that no outside agency would be involved in the tally, I told Gough.

Yes, Gough said, there was an outside “telecom” involved in the tally, although he said he could not reveal the name of the company.  This “telecom” is the most likely culprit behind the fraudulent tally in the Iowa caucus.  I am seeking information from people who were involved in the caucus to find the identity of this mysterious “telecom” that gave Romney the first, but fraudulent victory on January 3.  As the rest of the primaries will use even less verifiable electronic voting machine systems, solving what happened in the Iowa caucus is important because it could expose the criminals who steal our elections.

THE IOWA CAUCUS WAS STOLEN – ROMNEY DID NOT WIN

GOP officials discovered double-digit errors in 51 of those certified precincts when they compared what was reported on caucus night with the official Form E documents signed by precinct volunteers. Eleven precincts had errors of 50 or more votes.
– Des Moines Register, 19 January 2012

“The one thing that we can’t say is, we can’t certify every precinct in the state.”
– Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn, 19 January 2012

When I began writing this article, just after Christmas, I was simply going to predict that Mitt Romney would win the Iowa primary by vote fraud, just like Obama and John Kerry had won the Democratic state polls of 2008 and 2004.  My dire and pessimistic prediction was based solely on the fact that Romney was being supported by the high-level Zionist family of Lester Crown of Chicago.  These are people who steal elections, I thought, and they will find a way for Romney to win the crucial first caucus – one way or another.

I repeatedly queried three different people at the Republican Party of Iowa about how the results would be tallied and after hearing that they would not use an outside contractor to count the votes, decided to qualify my dismal prediction by giving them the benefit of the doubt.  I didn’t want to be a bearer of bad news so I wrote this (in the article below):

Mitt Romney would most likely win the caucus if the Republican Party of Iowa were to tally the caucus results using the dodgy telephonic tally system (Voxeo) used by the Iowa Democrats in 2004 and 2008. But after having intensively queried the Republican Party of Iowa about how the results will be tallied it seems to me that the Republican Party of Iowa will be tallying the results themselves in Des Moines… Let’s hope Ron Paul wins Iowa in a truly honest and transparent caucus on January 3. We certainly don’t need anymore illegal Zionist wars for profit and the people of Iowa know that as well as anyone.

Today, two weeks and three days after Romney was declared the winner in Iowa, thecertified final tally from the Republican Party of Iowa shows that he did NOT win the caucus at all.  The caucus process and tally were completely messed up and, according to the final, but still seriously flawed results, Rick Santorum reportedly won the caucus.  There is now very clear evidence of serious vote fraud in the Iowa caucus.  This cannot be simply dismissed as human error.  This was criminal vote fraud that cheated the entire nation.  The people involved in this case of egregious vote fraud must be investigated and prosecuted.

VOTE FRAUD IN AT LEAST 131 PRECINCTS
Here are the key extracts from the Washington Post article of 19 January 2012:

Rick Santorum won the Iowa caucuses Thursday — 16 days after the last vote was cast — when the state Republican Party said a final count showed him 34 votes ahead of Mitt Romney.

Santorum’s strange, belated victory also served to embarrass the Iowa GOP — which had to admit that it had misallocated some votes, and simply lost some others, in a razor’s-edge election where every vote mattered.

It also cast an unflattering light on the old-fashioned and convoluted system that the party uses to collect and count caucus votes.

“It should be like a fine Swiss watch,” said Iowa State political science professor Steffen Schmidt. “It’s really more like a sundial.” He said the system used by Iowa Democrats was not significantly better.

In fact, Iowa Republican leaders seemed to cast doubt on their own results, saying Thursday that it was hard to declare a “winner” without knowing what happened in those eight precincts.

Thursday’s final count came from these forms, which had to be submitted by Wednesday evening. The Des Moines Register, citing unidentified officials in the Iowa GOP, reported that in 131 precincts, the forms showed numbers different than those reported on caucus night.

But some Form E’s didn’t show up at all.

The state party found that it was missing results from eight precincts, spread across five counties.

Source:  “Santorum finished 34 votes ahead of Romney in new Iowa tally; votes from 8 precincts missing”, by David A. Fahrenthold and Debbi Wilgoren,Washington Post, 19 January 2012

THE ZIONIST AGENDA – STOP RON PAUL

Now we find out that Texas Congressman and GOP candidate Ron Paul has been targeted by a new breed of PAC, this time with foreign backing.
– “Israeli Lobby launch new Super PAC effort to bring down Ron Paul” by Patrick Henningsen, Global Research, 21 January 2012

I sort of have to chuckle when they describe you and me as being dangerous. We are dangerous to the status quo in this country.
– Ron Paul after his second-place finish in New Hampshire primary, 10 January 2012

I want to say one other challenge that we face is simply that we must find an alternative to war and bloodshed. Anyone who feels, and there are still a lot of people who feel that way, that war can solve the social problems facing mankind is sleeping through a great revolution. President Kennedy said on one occasion, “Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind.” The world must hear this. I pray God that America will hear this before it is too late, because today we’re fighting a war.

– Martin Luther King, Jr., “Remaining Awake Through A Great Revolution”, 31 March 1968, National Cathedral, Washington, D.C.

AMERICA’S 21-YEAR-OLD WAR

Monday, 16 January 2012, is Martin Luther King Day.  The same day will also mark the passage of 21 years since the United States military began fighting in the Middle East.  The U.S. has been actively engaged in war fighting in Iraq and the Middle East for a full 21 years, which is to say that Americans who will become adults in 2012 have never known what it means to live in a nation at peace.

Ron Paul, the anti-war Republican candidate for president, is a threat to the status quo of open-ended military intervention in the Middle East.  While some 70 percent of the American population wants an immediate end to the U.S.-led wars, Ron Paul is the only candidate that speaks for the majority that wants peace.

Barack Obama has ratcheted up the war in Afghanistan and has imposed sanctions on Iran that will lead to war if not reversed.  All of the Republican candidates other than Ron Paul are trying to outdo each other with their bellicose threats against Iran.  To understand why the candidates advocate such belligerent positions in spite of the growing anti-war sentiment among American voters, it is essential to understand that they are being paid and supported to do so by their Zionist (i.e. pro-Israel) backers.  Mitt Romney, for example, has very close ties to a high-level agent from Israeli military intelligence, the woman he made CEO of Bain & Company.


ROMNEY’S ISRAELI HANDLER – Orit Gadiesh, former “War Room” assistant to Ezer Weizman and Moshe Dayan, is the daughter of Israeli Brigadier General Falk Gadiesh (born Falk Gruenfeld, Berlin, 1921) and his Ukrainian-born wife.  Gadiesh is chairman of the management consulting firm Bain & Company, the parent company of Bain Capital, and was the company’s managing director under CEO Mitt Romney in 1992.  “She’s like a Jewish mother figure to many of the people at Bain,” ex-Bainie Dan Quinn told Fortunemagazine in 1996.


Bain Capital owns Clear Channel, the largest radio station group owner in the United States.  Clear Channel owns the networks which air the most popular radio talk shows, including The Rush Limbaugh Show, The Glenn Beck Program, The Sean Hannity Show, America Now with Andy Dean, Coast to Coast AM, The Savage Nation, The Mark Levin Show, and The Dave Ramsey Show.  (Graphic:  “Rush Limbaugh Spills the Beans on the Jewish Conspiracy” by Pat Healy)


Mitt Romney was a co-founder of Bain Capital along with Bill Bain, seen here.  Bain was ousted in 1991 and Romney served as CEO of Bain & Company in 1991-1992.  In May 1991, while Romney was CEO, Gadiesh was named chairman of the company’s Policy Committee, which set the company’s business strategy and policy. In 1992, under Romney, she became managing director.  Orit Gadiesh, who has worked at Bain & Co. since 1977, became chairman of Bain & Co. in 1993.

Orit Gadiesh, born in Israel in 1951, has worked closely with Mitt Romney since at least 1991, and probably much longer since she joined Bain & Company in 1977, when she was 26.  Romney appointed Gadiesh to his transition team when he became governor of Massachusetts in November 2002.  Gadiesh is the daughter of Falk Gadiesh, an Israeli brigadier general and former member of the general staff who reorganized the Israeli army in the early 1950s after a stint at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

Falk’s daughter Orit was chosen to serve in Israeli military intelligence. Her first position in the Israeli military was as assistant to Ezer Weizman, the deputy chief of staff who later became president of Israel.  During the early 1970s, she worked in the war room, a bunker where Gen. Moshe Dayan was in charge.  As a war room assistant to Weizman, Orit provided military leaders with documents and correspondence.

Prior to joining Bain & Company, Gadiesh served in the office of the Deputy Chief of Staff of the Israeli Army. Currently, she is on the board of directors of the Peres Center for Peace, an organization headed by a former chief of staff of the Israeli military, Lt. General Amnon Lipkin-Shahak. The high-level Mossadnik Avner Azulay, managing director of the Marc Rich Foundation, is also on the executive board of the Peres Center.


Mitt Romney speaking at the Mossad’s (IDC) Herzliya Conference in 2007.


ROMNEY’S INTELLIGENCE CHIEF AND CAMPAIGN ADVISER – Mitt Romney named Michael Chertoff, the Israeli agent who supervised the destruction of the crucial evidenceof 9/11, co-chair of his counterterrorism and intelligence advisory committee in October 2011.  The 9/11 cover-up continues.


Romney greets his old friend, Benjamin Netanyahu, one of the suspected architects of the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.

Mitt Romney attended the Mossad’s “Herzliya Conference on Israeli Security” in 2007. Romney and the current Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu worked together as consultants at the Boston Consulting Group early in their careers.

Romney’s close relationship with Orit Gadiesh and Israeli military intelligence is the real reason he is the chosen candidate of the Zionist establishment.  Romney is being supported by high-level Zionists, Israeli military intelligence, and their controlled media network.  This relationship between the Israeli military and Mitt Romney, a presidential candidate, should be of great concern to all Americans because this is how the Israeli military plans to drag the United States into a war with Iran.
EVIDENCE OF VOTE FRAUD SURFACES


WHO STOLE THE IOWA CAUCUS? – Edward True, 28, helped count the 53 votes in his precinct and jotted down the results. When he checked to make sure the Republican Party of Iowa got the count right, he said he was shocked to find they hadn’t. “When Mitt Romney won Iowa by eight votes and I’ve got a 20-vote discrepancy here, that right there says Rick Santorum won Iowa,”

WHO REALLY WON IN IOWA?

There are alarming news reports that show that the tally of the Republican caucus in Iowa was manipulated giving fraudulent additional votes to Mitt Romney.  In one precinct alone, where Romney received only two votes, the tally showed twenty-two, an increase of 1,000 percent!  If such egregious vote fraud happened in one precinct, it most likely happened in others:

Des Moines TV station KCCI reported that a Ron Paul backer attending his first precinct caucuses in Appanoose County, in southern Iowa, said the vote from his precinct was inaccurately reported and gave Romney 20 more votes than he actually received.

The Paul supporter, Edward True of Moulton, told The Associated Press that he helped count the ballots cast at his precinct caucuses and that Romney received two votes. True said he was shocked to see the official results on the Republican Party website showed Romney with 22 votes in the precinct.

“I assume somebody made a typographical error,” he said in a telephone interview.  True said that when he contacted local Republican officials, “They said they would sort it out in the next couple of weeks, but how many primaries will have happened by that time?”
– “Santorum shrugs off report of Iowa vote errors” , 6 January 2012

IMMEDIATE AUDIT OF IOWA RESULTS REQUIRED

Edward True, 28, said at his 53-person caucus at the Garrett Memorial Library, Romney received only two votes.  According to the Iowa Republican Party’s website, True’s precinct cast 22 votes for Romney.  “This is huge,” True said. “It essentially changes who won.”  While the mainstream media portrays this as a single typographical error it may be an indication of a more serious case of vote fraud.  Edward True’s discovery is clear evidence of vote fraud and a complete audit of the Iowa tally must be done to determine if the caucus results were manipulated on a statewide scale.

When I began this article about Ron Paul and the Iowa caucus, a week before it happened, I was strongly inclined to predict that Mitt Romney was going to win, based solely on my knowledge that he is supported financially by the Crown family of Chicago, a family of high-level Zionist weapons dealers closely tied to the state of Israel.  The Crown family, which profits directly from war and defense spending, also supports Barack Obama and is one of those highly-connected Zionist clans that knows how to make their candidates win elections – one way or another.  Lester Crown also sits on the board of the Peres Center, along with Orit Gadiesh and other high-level Mossadniks.

ROMNEY’S ISRAELI HANDLER


Orit Gadiesh (age 60) is a high-level Israeli military intelligence agent at Bain & Co. who has worked closely with Mitt Romney for decades.


Orit Gadiesh, born 1951, is the daughter of Falk Gadiesh (formerly Gruenfeld) one of the Israeli army’s first brigadier generals and a member of the General Staff.  The Gruenfeld family immigrated to Palestine in 1939 when Falk was 18.  He became a Brigadier and was sent by Israeli military intelligence to the United States in 1952 (see names on KLM’s U.S. passenger manifest) on a diplomatic passport to study at MIT.  He then returned to Israel and reorganized the Israeli army.


A book about the Gruenfeld family provides information about Brigadier General Falk Gadiesh.  (Source: Das Leinenhaus Gruenfeld, Berlin 1967)

Romney’s support from the Crown family, which is closely tied to the state of Israel and its military intelligence agencies, is most likely based on his decades of working with Bain & Company, which is headed by Orit Gadiesh, an Israeli military intelligence agent.  Romney and Gadiesh have worked together at Bain since the early 1990s.  Gadiesh is the Israeli intelligence agent who steers Bain & Co., and who probably advises Mitt Romney on the Middle East and other matters.  She served on Romney’s transition team when he became governor of Massachusetts.

The following extracts provide some basic information on the Israeli agent who controls Mitt Romney:

Founded in 1973 by former Boston Consulting Group vice president William H. Bain, Jr., Bain & Co., based in Boston, has offices in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, New York, Palo Alto and San Francisco. After experiencing a serious crisis in the 1980s and 1990s, Bain rebounded under the leadership of former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney (who had previously worked with Bain Capital, a separate company) and Orit Gadiesh, one of the few women to head a top consulting firm. It had revenues of $1.6 billion and over 4,000 employees in 2007.
Source: http://www.inthepublicinterest.org/organization/bain-company

Orit Gadiesh
52, Chair, Bain & Company
She stands over 6 feet tall in heels. She worked in military intelligence in her native Israel. And she runs one of the world’s largest, most elite business-consulting firms, with big-hitter clients like De Beers, ITT, and Dell. Twelve years ago, Gadiesh succeeded Mitt Romney as head of what was once called the KGB of consulting firms. Given her connections to the governor, it was no surprise when he named her to his transition team. Gadiesh was one of only two Bostonians listed the last time Fortune magazine published its female power list in 2000.
Source:http://www.bostonmagazine.com/articles/power_the_100_women_who_run_this_town/page2

A Romney victory in Iowa, I wrote, would have certainly been the result if the Republicans were to use the same dodgy telephonic tally system (Voxeo, a firm tied to Israeli military intelligence) which had been used by the Democrats of Iowa in the two previous elections.  I have written extensively about how the Israeli-linked Voxeo system was used to manipulate the tallies of the Iowa Democrat caucuses of 2004 and 2008.  The rigging of the Iowa caucus allows for the presidential election to be stolen at the beginning – like a baby from its crib.  It now appears very likely that the Republican caucus of 2012 was also manipulated and stolen.  The national importance of the Iowa caucus means that we have a right to demand an independent audit of the results.

 The evidence indicates that the Republican Party of Iowa is not able to provide verifiable results in a timely manner.  We should not have to wait two weeks to have the results from such a simple, but important poll.

One week before the caucus I contacted the Republican Party of Iowa and spoke with three different people in their communications department about how the results would be tallied.  Patrick, the first person I spoke to about the vote counting process, told me that he could not reveal how the tally would be done “for security purposes.”  Ryan, the second person, told me that the precincts would communicate the results to caucus headquarters in Des Moines but the way in which the precinct results were to be sent was being kept secret for security purposes.

Finally, I spoke to Nicole Sizemore, the assistant director of communications.  Sizemore told me that there was no outside agency involved in the tally process and that it would be “very transparent” with oversight by observers from the different campaigns.  The complete tally with “total breakdown” by precinct, she said, would be released within 14 days of the January 3 caucus.  I was glad to hear this and decided not to come out with a gloomy prediction that Mitt Romney would win.  With the information I had from the Republican Party of Iowa it seemed that there was a good chance for a honest and transparent caucus.  It now seems that my trust was misplaced and that my instinct that vote fraud would give Romney a victory in Iowa was correct after all.

If the statement of Edward True is true and correct, the tally numbers for Mitt Romney were manipulated.  If vote fraud happened in True’s precinct, it probably happened in others all across the state.  The tally from the Iowa caucus must be examined to see if the statewide results match the precinct results for each of the 1,774 precincts.  Now that the Iowa caucus is over, the method by which the results were communicated to caucus HQ needs to be exposed and examined because, just like the Voxeo telephonic vote-counting system, this appears to have been the weak link through which the results were manipulated giving Mitt Romney his victory in Iowa.

*   *   *   *   *

To those who believe that America has a “free press”, impartial and unbiased, just watch the following short video in which CNN blatantly censored the comments of Corporal Jesse Thorsen, a U.S. Army soldier from West Des Moines who has served multiple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan – and who supports Ron Paul because he is tired of war and would like to have some “peace time” duty:

“I’m really excited about a lot of his ideas, especially when it comes to bringing the soldiers home. I’ve been serving for ten years now and all ten years of those have been during wartime. I would like to see a little peace time army.”
– Corporal Jesse Thorsen to CNN


Ron Paul came in third place in Iowa behind the two Zionist-supported pro-war candidates, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum.  Santorum recently stated on “Meet the Press” that he would bomb Iran’s nuclear reactors if elected president.  Is that an acceptable policy statement from a candidate for president?  Does 50 percent of the Republican Party of Iowa truly want to wage yet another disastrous and costly war in the Middle East, i.e. against the Islamic Republic of Iran, or is there another explanation for these results?  These results are from the Washington Post and are not final.

I had always believed, and still believe, that oppressive forces draw much of their strength from their ability to wield their power in secret.
– Julian Assange – The Unauthorized Autobiography (2011)

Israeli general Amos Yadlin traveled to Chicago in an effort to enlist [Lester] Crown’s help in convincing the administration to attack Iran.
– “Israel, Big Money and Obama”, 20 August 2010

The Crown family supports candidates from both parties, depending on their strategic goal. Susan Crown, for example, who gave at least $12,300 to candidate Obama between 2003 and 2007 is now supporting the Republican Mitt Romney’s bid for the White House. – “Chicago’s Elders of Zion and Obama’s War for Profit”, October 2011

The final report of the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistansaid that somewhere between $31 and $60 billion has been lost through contract waste and fraud in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Put another way, war profiteers took as much as $60 billion from taxpayers and didn’t give us anything in return.

– “No Success in Iraq – Unless You’re a War Profiteer” by Robert Greenwald and Derrick Crowe

The ongoing cover-up of 9/11, the fraudulent “War on Terror”, and the trillion-dollar U.S. military intervention in the Middle East are the key elements coloring the political context of the U.S. presidential election of 2012.  The false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the U.S. military aggression in the Middle East are two sides of the same counterfeit coin which has been used for the past decade to deceive and defraud the American people – and the world.  The massive fraud that began with 9/11 and which has been used to rob the nation of untold billions could not possibly be maintained were it not for the utterly corrupt political establishment of Washington, D.C. and the controlled media.  This ongoing deception is the real background against which the Iowa caucus, the first poll of the 2012 presidential election, needs to be viewed.

The Republican caucus in Iowa on January 3 is of great importance because it is the first poll to determine which candidate will challenge Barack Obama for the presidency.  A CNN/Time poll indicates that Ron Paul and Mitt Romney are currently the front runners polling about 25 percent each.  Two days earlier Ron Paul was the clear front runner, several points ahead of Romney and Newt Gingrich, who has now fallen further behind.  Despite Paul’s common sense positions and popularity with voters, the paid pundits of the controlled media outlets constantly attack his positions as “out of the mainstream”.

Paul, who is a very popular candidate, is treated most unfairly by so-called alternative media outlets such as Salon and the Huffington Post.  When one reads, for example, the first sentence of the Bob Cesca piece on the Huffington Post in which he says progressives that support Ron Paul are “out of their blessed gourds”, it is worth remembering that the Huffington Post was acquired by AOL in February 2011 for$315 million.  There is always a political reason for such media acquisitions and the Ron Paul candidacy is that reason.  This is a perfect example of how, and why, the so-called alternative media is controlled by the same sinister forces that control the “mainstream” press.  What better way is there to control the thoughts of progressive voters than to control the websites they rely on for information?


Ron Paul is opposed to waging war against Iran.

I am just absolutely convinced that the best formula for giving us peace and preserving the American way of life is freedom, limited government, and minding our own business overseas.
– Ron Paul

A CNN/ORC poll released in November found that 68 percent of Americans opposed the war in Iraq and 63 percent are against the one in Afghanistan. Yet, we keep hearing that only hawks have a chance to be elected president… Dr. Ron Paul is firmly anti-war, anti-empire, and anti-torture. He has been drawing large crowds in Iowa.  He has legions of volunteers and a steady source of money through Internet fundraising. His supporters are willing, as one said, to “crawl over broken glass” for him. So if there is snow in Iowa or New Hampshire, that should be no problem.

– Ron Paul, the anti-war candidate” by Mary Meehan, The Baltimore Sun, 2 January 2012
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-antiwar-20120102,0,6340945.story

One of the key issues, perhaps the most crucial issue, in the GOP Iowa caucus is the position of the candidates regarding the Zionist war policy against Iran. Ron Paul is opposed to waging war against Iran while Romney and most of the others are eager armchair warriors against the Islamic Republic of Iran. With the new U.S. sanctions seeking to strangle Iran financially having brought counter threats to close the Strait of Hormuz, the U.S. position vis-a-vis Iran is now of the utmost importance as the chances of war are greater than ever.

Iran has been the subject of a Zionist war strategy for years in the same way that organized Jewry declared war on Germany in the early 1930s, long before the invasion of Poland in 1939. The punitive sanctions against Iran are war by other methods and unless the United States changes its approach to Iran it will find itself in another major war in the Middle East, one with drastic and unforeseeable consequences.


Henry, Lester, and Susan Crown of Chicago.  A family of Zionist war profiteers, the Crowns became rich on U.S. defense spending in World War II and have profited on every war since.  The Crowns are big financial supporters of Republican Mitt Romney and the Democrat Barack Obama – both Zionist-controlled pro-war candidates.

The Crown family of Chicago is one of the key Zionist supporters of Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.  As a major shareholder of General Dynamics, the Crown family profits from U.S. defense spending and war.  As a leading Zionist family, the Crowns support sanctions and the Israeli warmongering against Iran.  The Crowns have invested in Mitt Romney because he is willing to wage war to please his Zionist supporters.  To push the nation into war to serve a foreign state is treasonous.


Mitt Romney is hawkish on Iran because he is supported by Zionist warmongers like the Crown family of Chicago.

Mitt Romney would most likely win the caucus if the Republican Party of Iowa were to tally the caucus results using the dodgy telephonic tally system (Voxeo) used by the Iowa Democrats in 2004 and 2008.  But after having intensively queried the Republican Party of Iowa about how the results will be tallied it seems to me that the Republican Party of Iowa will be tallying the results themselves in Des Moines.

Nicole Sizemore, assistant communications director for the GOP of Iowa, told Bollyn.com that there is no outside contractor involved in the tally and that it will be a “very transparent” poll with multiple observers.  Although Sizemore could not reveal the specifics about how the results would be communicated to headquarters, she confirmed that a complete breakdown of the 1,774 precinct results would be published within 14 days.  These are the key elements of an open and transparent poll.

This is good news because it suggests that the results of the January 3 Republican caucus are likely to be more representative, honest, and accurate than the Democratic caucus in 2008 that helped bring the dark horse candidate Barack Obama to power.  In 2004 another dark horse candidate, John Kerry, came from behind to run against George W. Bush.  In both cases, pro-war candidates from the back of the pack won the rigged caucus, effectively removing the question of the illegal war policy from the debate.  Let’s hope Ron Paul wins Iowa in a truly honest and transparent caucus on January 3.  We certainly don’t need anymore illegal Zionist wars for profit and the people of Iowa know that as well as anyone.  Iowa has lost 69 servicemen in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq with more than 477 wounded, according to iCasualties.org.

In the following video clips from a Republican debate Ron Paul explains his position on Iran.  Rick Santorum recently stated that he would bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities if elected president.  Iran is the central foreign policy question facing the presidential candidates.  The U.S. has been at war in the Middle East for 21 years, since January 1991, when President George H.W. Bush went to war against Iraq over Kuwait.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

ABC News, “Bribes, Chinese Mob Ties Alleged at Casino of Gingrich Money Man”, 27 January 2012
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/bribes-chinese-mob-ties-alleged-casino-gingrich-money/story?id=15455918

“A Bigger Scandal: Illegal U.S. Funding of Sharon’s Likud” by Anton Chaitkin, Executive Intelligence Review, 24 January 2003
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3003likud_usgangsta.html 

Associated Press, “Gingrich cancels campaign event, poor attendance”, 20 January 2012
http://www.mercurynews.com/presidentelect/ci_19782823

Amnon Lipkin-Shahak, Wikipedia, January 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amnon_Lipkin-Shahak

“Bain names two top executives”, Boston Globe, 7 May 1991

Bollyn, Christopher, “Chicago’s Elders of Zion and Obama’s War for Profit”, 14 October 2011
http://www.bollyn.com/occupy-dc
Bollyn, “The 9/11 Cover Up – The Destruction of the Steel Evidence”, May 2011
http://www.bollyn.com/the-911-cover-up-the-destruction-of-the-steel-evidence 

Bollyn, “ELRON – VOXEO: The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies the Iowa Caucus”, 31 December 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/elron-voxeo-the-israeli-defense-firm-that-tallies-the-iowa-caucus

Bollyn, “Voxeo’s Ties to 9-11 and the Israeli Military”, 5 January 2008
http://www.bollyn.com/voxeos-ties-to-9-11-and-the-israeli-military

Bollyn, “Bollyn Responds to Voxeo”, 7 January 2008
http://www.bollyn.com/bollyn-responds-to-voxeo

Das Leinenhaus Grünfeld , Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1967

Henningsen, Patrick, “Israeli Lobby launch new Super PAC effort to bring down Ron Paul,” Global Research, 21 January 2012
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28776

“In the War Room”, by Glenn Rifkin, New York Times, 8 September 1996
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/09/08/business/in-the-war-room.html?scp=2&sq=Gadiesh&st=cse

“Israel, Big Money and Obama – Mr. Crown and the President”, by Margaret Kimberley, CounterPunch.org, 20 August 2010
http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/08/20/israel-big-money-and-obama/

“No Success in Iraq — Unless You’re a War Profiteer”, by Robert Greenwald and Derrick Crowe, Huffingtonpost.com, 15 December 2011
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-greenwald-and-derrick-crowe/no-success-in-iraq–unles_b_1151171.html 
“Orit Gadiesh rises to head Bain & Co. in Boston”, Boston Globe, 31 March 1992

Orit Gadiesh, Chairman, Bain & Company, MIT Sloan School of Management
http://mitsloan.mit.edu/corporate/pdf/gadiesh%20.pdf
Orit Gadiesh Interview, Harvard Business School
http://www.hbs.edu/entrepreneurs/pdf/oritgadiesh.pdf

Peres Center for Peace, International Board of Governors, Cached November 2011
http://web.archive.org/web/20100822121512/http://www.peres-center.org/fulllist.html

Peres Center for Peace, President and Executive Board, Cached November 2011
http://web.archive.org/web/20100906042623/http://www.peres-center.org/ExecutiveBoard.html
“Romney taps Chertoff as campaign adviser”, by Max Pizarro, PolitickerNJ.com, 6 October 2011 http://www.politickernj.com/51511/romney-taps-chertoff-campaign-advisor

“Rush Limbaugh Spills the Beans on the Jewish Conspiracy” (Satire) by Pat Healy, 21 December 2010
http://theforbiddentruth.net/11369-rush-limbaugh-spills-beans-jewish-conspiracy.html 
“The Man Behind Gingrich’s Money”, New York Times, 28 January 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/us/politics/the-man-behind-gingrichs-money.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

“Why Haven’t ES&S Voting Machines Been Outlawed?”, CrooksandLiars.com, 12 June 2010
http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/why-arent-ess-voting-machines-outlawed

END

 

US e-voting system cracked in less than 48 hours

The H Security

From The H Security

Broken Padlock Icon

Researchers at the University of Michigan have reported that it took them only a short time to break through the security functions of a pilot project for online voting in Washington, D.C. “Within 48 hours of the system going live, we had gained near complete control of the election server”, the researchers wrote in a paperPDF that has now been released.

“We successfully changed every vote and revealed almost every secret ballot.” The hack was only discovered after about two business days – and most likely only because the intruders left a visible trail on purpose.

In 2010, the developers of the municipal e-voting system that enables voters living abroad to vote via a web site, invited security experts to conduct tests. The university researchers say that the project was developed in cooperation with the Open Source Digital Voting Foundation (OSDV) and that other US states have also worked on services similar to Washington’s “Digital Vote-by-Mail Service”.

They also praise the system’s transparency as exemplary but point out that its architecture has fundamental security weaknesses and was not able to withstand a shell injection and other common hacker techniques.

The security experts investigated common vulnerable points such as login fields, the virtual ballots’ content and filenames, and session cookies – and found several exploitable weaknesses. Even the Linux kernel used in the project proved to have a well known vulnerability.

They were also able to use the PDFs generated by the system to trick the encryption mechanism, while unsecured surveillance cameras provided additional insights into the infrastructure. While the open source nature of the code made their work somewhat easier, they believe that attackers would have been able to make quick headway even if the system had been proprietary.

The researchers conclude that it is generally difficult to build secure online voting systems. One small configuration or implementation error would undermine the entire voting process.

Even if central servers were not used, which would be prime targets for hacking attempts, there would still be a number of other points of attack. Fundamental advances still need to be made in security, they say, before e-voting will truly be safe.

(fab)

END

 

NATO Game Over 2012 – Activists Plan to Occupy NATO Headquarters

 

From Alexander Higgins Blog

Posted by  – March 10, 2012

NATO Game Over 2012 Campaign

On April 1st, 2012 activists are planning a non-violent humanitarian intervention at the NATO headquarters in Brussels and request you spread the word and join them.

Clip of the NATO Game Over campaign 2012.
Read more and register @ www.warstartshere.eu

Nederlands – Français – Español – Italiano – Türkçe:

Nederlands: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8m9v5KfjMf8

Français – Belgique: http://youtu.be/4pAWdWxEEwY

Français – international: http://youtu.be/17E6MCgXQGw

Español: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4D2HinOW80

Italiano: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqeVlCWE0S8

Türkçe: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2mMjXJ1PDE

NATO, GameOver, 2012, Vredesactie, Action, pour, la, Paix

Activist Post adds:

Coalition of Peace Activists Plan to Occupy NATO Headquarters this April

 A peace coalition known as the European Antimilitarist Network is planning a nonviolent humanitarian intervention at the NATO headquarters in Brussels this April 1st, 2012.  This network of antimilitarist groups is fed up with NATO using the “humanitarian” excuses to justify aggressive military intervention in sovereign nations.

Their website WarStartsHere.eu states “The increasingly trans­na­tional structure of military interventions requires activists to coordinate resistance activities better.”

The following groups pre­sently form the core of the net­work: War Resisters’ Interna­tional (International), Vredes­actie/Bombspotting (Belgium), alternativa antimilitarista-moc (Spain), Ofog – för en kärn­va­pen­fri värld (Sweden),

Deutsche Friedensgesellschaft-Vereinigte KriegsdienstgegnerInnen (Ger­many), Gewaltfreie Aktion Atom­waffen abschaffen (Germany), Aseistakieltäytyjäliitto (AKL – Finland), Transnational Institute (TNI – Netherlands), Trident Ploughshares (Britain), Gruppe für eine Schweiz ohne Armee (GsoA – Switzerland).

They stress the need for multinational nonviolent activism to combat the international support system for war:

The wars in Iraq or Afghanistan, the military operations in the Red Sea and the Mediterranean, or the European Union military in­terventions in Congo and Sudan would not have been possible without the use of military infra­structure in Europe. This military infrastructure – military bases, headquarters, satellite centres, ports, and even civilian airports used by the military – form the backbone for wars and inter­ventions.

The network is dedicated to actions of civil disobe­dience and nonviolent direct actions to stop the death and destruction of needless wars. But they emphasize that protesting is no longer enough to stop the war machine from continuing unabated. It’s time, they say, to “make the step from protesting against war to resisting war!”  And that resistance begins in organized fashion on April 1st at NATO’s headquarters in Belgium.

It has never been more urgent to resist serving the war machine in all of it’s capacities. Join their occupation and march on NATO this April.

Please visit and support the War Starts Here coalition today.

Related Posts :

END

 

US BREAKS ITS OWN LAWS TO SUPPORT ISRAELI TERRORISM

 

From DesertPeace

March 12, 2012

The Foreign Assistance Act, signed into law in 1961, stipulates that “no security assistance may be provided to any country the government of which engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights.”*

US sent 600,000 tear gas canisters to Israel, says new report

By David Elkins

Israeli soldier fires tear gas cannister

Israeli soldiers have killed and injured Palestinians and US citizens with weaponry supplied by the US government.

(Najeh Hashlamoun / APA images)

WASHINGTON  – A new policy paper published earlier this week by the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation documents a number of cases occurring over the past decade in which weapons and ammunition produced and financed by the US have been used to kill unarmed Palestinians and US citizens.

“US military aid to Israel is a policy that is running on autopilot and must be reconsidered,” Josh Ruebner, the national advocacy director for the organization and author of the new policy paper, said on Monday.

“US weapons provided to Israel at taxpayer expense make the US complicit in Israel’s human rights abuses of Palestinians living under Israel’s 44-year military occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip and defeat US foreign policy objectives of halting Israeli settlement expansion, ending Israeli military occupation and establishing a just and lasting Israeli-Palestinian peace,” Ruebner added.

Between the years 2000 and 2009, the US transferred “more than 670 million weapons, rounds of ammunition and related equipment,” according to the report.

Violating US law

During the same period, “Israel killed at least 2,969 unarmed Palestinians, including 1,128 children, often with US weapons in violation of the Foreign Assistance Act and Arms Export Control Act.”

The Foreign Assistance Act, signed into law in 1961, stipulates that “no security assistance may be provided to any country the government of which engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights.”

Several US administrations have sanctioned or withheld funding from countries, including Israel, that violated laws such as the Foreign Assistance Act. But according to the report, official inquires and investigations into US military aid to Israel over recent decades have been met with growing resistance from groups both within and outside of the US government.

Although more expensive weapons systems such as tanks and aircraft make up the bulk of purchasing contracts made between the Israeli government and US manufacturers, small arms and ammunition purchases account for the largest number of deaths.

Killing with American bullets

The report notes evidence that the Israeli military loads many of its guns with high-velocity tear gas canisters and rubber-coated bullets manufactured in the US — a frequent culprit in deaths throughout the West Bank.

“From fiscal year 2000 to 2009, the State Department licensed — and US taxpayers funded — the delivery of more than 595,000 tear gas canisters and other ‘riot control’ equipment to the Israeli military, valued at more than $20.5 million,” according to the report.

In a 2007 “memorandum of understanding,” the US pledged $30 billion in military assistance to Israel between 2009 and 2018 — a 25 percent increase in average annual military aid over previous years. Israel will receive roughly $3.1 billion in US military aid for fiscal year 2012.

Speaking at a conference held at the Palestine Center on Monday, Ruebner argued that, apart from the seeming contradiction of US pledges to protect human rights for everyone, military aid to Israel imperils US strategic interests in the region.

It also defers much-needed US tax revenues away from domestic programs, and contributes to a positive feedback loop that conditions the fulfillment of stated US goals in the region, such as a negotiated, two-state settlement, on even more military aid that, in turn, is used to continue the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, he said.

Citing data obtained for the US Internal Revenue Service and Census Bureau, the report places the quantity of US military aid in a larger context.

Liability

“With the same amount of money that the US gives each year to fund weapons for Israel, the federal government could instead fund affordable housing vouchers for 350,000 low-income families, or green jobs training for 500,000 unemployed workers, or early reading programs for 900,000 at-risk students, or primary health care to 24 million people without insurance,” according to the report.

“Far from being a strategic benefit to the US, [military aid to Israel] is actually a growing political, economic and strategic liability,” Ruebner said.

The release of the policy paper coincided with the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a Zionist lobbying group, in Washington that included speeches by senior US government officials, including President Barack Obama.

US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta reaffirmed America’s security commitment to Israel, including financing for a missile defense and fighter-jet weapons systems in a speech during the conference.

“This is an ironclad pledge which says that the United States will provide whatever support is necessary so that Israel can maintain military superiority over any state or coalition of states, as well as non-state actors,” Panetta said.

On Monday, US Congressmen Eric Cantor and Steny Hoyer introduced legislation that will “expand Israel’s authority to make purchases under the foreign military financing program,” and require the president to report to Congress on “actions to improve the process relating to Israel’s purchase of F-35 aircraft to improve cost efficiency and timely delivery.”

“Today, my friend Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer and I are introducing legislation to reaffirm our enduring commitment to the US-Israel strategic relationship and to ensure that threats to Israeli and American security will be answered with strength,” Cantor stated on Monday.

“It is a bond that reflects the shared values of our people and our shared interests in preserving stability in the Middle East…It is a reminder that support for Israel is not and should never be a partisan issue,” Congressman Hoyer added.

Ruebner emphasised several steps US lawmakers could take to prevent additional human rights violations, most notably the enactment of laws that would make US military aid conditional on freezing Israeli settlement building in the West Bank and ending the blockade of the Gaza Strip.

Source 

END

 

 

Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

Advertisements

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: