DaniMartExtras, Too


REAL NEWS April 17

Posted by Xaniel777 on April 17, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : April 17, 2012


Bush, Blair Must Stand Trial For War Crimes: UK Lord


From Alexander Higgins Blog

Posted by  – April 16, 2012

A British Lord has called for the prosecution of former Prime Minister Tony Blair and former US president George W. Bush for committing war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Bush, Blair Must Stand Trial For War Crimes: UK Lord

Press TV – Lord Ahmed, the first British Muslim life peer in the House of Lords, said Blair and Bush are widely accused of launching “illegal” wars in the two Asian countries and thus should stand trials.

“There have been war crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan and those people who have got strong allegations against them – George W Bush and Tony Blair – have been involved in illegal wars and should be brought to justice,” Ahmed said.

He made the comments after the Labour Party accused him of telling a gathering in Haripur, Pakistan, earlier this month, that he “can announce a bounty of £10 million” for the capture of the US “president [Barrack] Obama and his predecessor, George [W.] Bush.”

The Labour party has suspended Ahmed for allegedly offering the bounty, which he denies.

“I never said those words. I did not offer a bounty,” Ahmed said, challenging the Labour Party to provide evidence to support their claim. He did not, however, deny that he included Obama among the war criminals, reiterating that he has called for the prosecution of Blair and Bush.

“I do not think there’s anything wrong with that. If the Labour Party wants to suspend me I will deal with the Labour Party. They will have to give me some evidence,” he said.

Ahmed, who became a life peer in 1998, has been a vocal critic of the anti-Muslim bigotry in Britain.

He was instrumental in the entry ban on Dutch MP Geert Wilders who sought to screen his anti-Islam film in Britain back in 2009.

He was also highly critical of awarding knighthood to the anti-Islam hate writer, Salman Rushdie, back in 2007, saying he was “appalled” by the decision as Rushdie has “blood on his hands.”

Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/kr3at
Facebook: http://facebook.com/alexhiggins732

Related Posts :





 It is time to take the ring of power to mount doom


From Benjamin Fulford Blog

April 17, 2012

The battle for control of the global financial system and thus the future of the planet has reached a temporary deadlock as the committee of 300 struggles to maintain power even as the rest of the world continues to push for a fair, free and open financial system controlled by the people of the planet.

The situation has reached the point where physical action against the committee (mainly in the form of mass arrests) has become the only possible recourse.

One problem, of course, lies in the issue of what to do about the “ring of power,” or the job hitherto referred to as M1, wherein a single individual has ultimate control over the creation and distribution of money.

There is no M1 now according to the Swiss government and other sources.

Somebody needs to make sure that never again is single individual given such power and that means metaphorically taking the centralized control of finance and dissolving it in the “Mt. Doom,” of the Lord of the Rings to ensure that humanity is once again free from debt slavery and horror.

There were many meetings world-wide last week aimed at accomplishing exactly this.

Join to finish reading the rest of : Weekly Geopolitical News and Analys





Clif High : ‘ my opinion is that fulford is lying…’


{ XANIEL’S NOTE :  To be sure, I have a very health respect for all three men mentioned in the latest post from Clif High below. But despite my respect for them, I don’t always agree with any one of them all the time.  

STILL, they each have earned the right to be heard and taken very seriously, even when they don’t agree with each other.

For as we are all aware, Great Minds do not always see eye to eye !

The post below is Clif High’s OPINION ONLY and not a concrete fact. He has a right to disagree with either/or  Fulford or Wilcocks, the same way you or I may not always agree with them.

However, of the three,  I most often do not agree with Clif High.  As his work has proven to be many times : incorrect , over exaggerated or badly timed  through-out much of  the web-bot’s prediction history.

Not being judgmental mind you, just calling it the way I see it. As I too have opinions. (…go figure, right… ?)

In all fairness to Clif, even he has admitted this on several occasions.

So, even though he highly disagrees with Fulford and Wilcock on the matter of  ‘ The Mass Arrests ‘ , ( possibly because he’s using his own work to establish this opinion), it does not make him correct. In the same breath, it doesn’t make him wrong either.

Each of these well known and well respected men are using their specific gifts and well earned talents to come to their versions of the truth, or as close to that truth( whatever that may be ) as humanly possible.

Which one is right ??

Well, this is where each of us must do our own long and deep research and then shape our own opinions accordingly. 

Once this is done we can compare it to the work of these great men and see which one came closest to our own conclusions !

And then we will wait and see which direction destiny takes us. BTW, we DO have the ability to push destiny to our favorite outcome.

And no matter what, do not let anybody tell you different.  



From Half Past Human.com

(update at bottom)

i have been repeatedly asked my opinion of the claims being made by Ben Fulford and David Wilcock and this fellow identifying himself as Drake. This is becoming tedious to address in emails.

My opinion is that Drake is full of shit. Further, he does not have the ‘contacts’, nor position that he claims.

In his several radio interviews, the language that he uses brings me to this conclusion.

My opinion is that Ben Fulford is lying. And is he lying not only about the ‘mass arrests’, but also is clearly fishing in the river of denial about Fukushima.

His lies about the financial oppression by the banksters are disinformation that causes emotional turmoil as listeners who do not use discrimination of mind are first taken to the heights of hope, only to crash to deep dispair as reality intrudes on Ben’s fantasy.

But he will kill people with his lies about the radiation.

So, i call Benjamin Fulford on his bullshit.

The financial shit i do not care about (total fantasy on his part), but if he actually has tested for background radiations in dozens of places in and around Tokyo, then please, provide specifics about the types of counters used, the dates, and the actual readings .

Otherwise shut the f@#k up about it. You will cause people to die.

Here on the West Coast of North America our daily background radiations are now 20 to 40 times higher than in my first samples in our area in 2003.

Unlike fulford, i actually own two nuclear decay meters, and have them calibrated, and know how to use them, and further know what i am measuring. These were obtained through UnitedNuclear.

Fulford, in my opinion, does not possess the mental acuity to be an accurate reporter of the radiation story in Japan.

It is my opinion that he did not participate in any sampling for radiation at all, and is lying about it.

Part of the denial syndrome. It will break down soon, not only for Ben, but for millions around the planet.

David Wilcock claims to have ‘vetted’ the ‘drake’ by his (david’s) previous contacts to ‘inside’ sources…..sooo…since drake is not as claimed, then this makes David’s contacts worthless in validating anything, and, now calls into question ANY and ALL claims he has ever made to any ‘inside’ source or knowledge.

Not that i ever gave David much credence, after all, Wilcock is so naive that he believes what Dan Burish (nee Crain) has to say.


i did not, as many on the net have claimed, call ben fulford a ‘liar’. What i criticized (re read above), was his behavior, not the man. Likely this will not be understood, but i like the personality that ben fulford presents to the world.

Also, in many regards he is braver than i, and for that, i give him proper respect as a human and a man.

So no, i did not call ben a liar. Let us be clear on that. My comment on his mental acuity goes to his focus on all things financial to such an extent, in my opinion, that it is an obstacle to clear thinking in other areas.

Also, i respect David Wilcock, for what he is, and the contribution that he makes for us all in his unceasing work.

Again, i am not critcizing the man, but the behavior.

In this case, David is risking huge amounts of what has now become known as ‘social equity’. If, as i suspect, the ‘drake’ is not what he claims, then David will take a hit to his social equity (credibility/prestige) that will be felt.

But let us also be clear on something, the disaster at Fukushima is manifesting the language of the ‘israeli mistake’ sub set of our data (israeli ties to this are extensive, from stuxnet onward…).

This could well turn out to be a disaster that will yet kill most of the life north of the equator and a good deal of that below.

The data set that produced the forecast language for the ‘israeli mistake’ has had fulfillment from language emerging from this on-going, potentially lethal-to-all-humans-and-other-animal-life, nuclear disaster.

If our data set that forecast the ‘israeli mistake’ and subsequent ‘ill winds’ is to be taken as accurate, then the good news is that probably only a billion or so will die as a direct result of the on-going disaster at Fukushima.

However, we are frequently wrong in our forecasts (as are all, honest, prognosticators).

So, what if Fukushima actually is an extinction level event? We have had data sets indicating that scenario as well.

And there are currently LOTS of supporting evidence for nasty nuclear effects all over Japan, and from credible sources. Which makes Ben’s claims incredible by default.

In my opinion, as one of the soon to be killed by planetary radiation poisoning, now is the time to stop the bullshit.

If Billy Meier had ever really had contact with any alien, now is the time for him to shout to them as loud as he can, “help us”. Personally i think he is a fraud.

If Dr. Andersen can really warp time, even in a small bubble for a limited period, now is the moment for him to get out of whatever hole they have him trapped in and give me a call.

It is not hard to find me, and i think i have an idea of how to encapsulate Fukushima in such a way (with a time distortion field….if he can actually generate it) that would, theoretically anyway, cut off the risk from the continuing meltdown.

It is certainly worth a few days out of our busy lives to try to correct this situation.

Even if we, as individual human inhabitants of terra fail, which is the most probable outcome, we still have the right to try. It is our planet too.

That the powers-that-be are incapable, or unwilling to attempt anything, and everything, no matter how screwy, to fix Fukushima, need not stop honorable humans from addressing problems in our planet’s environment.

Tptb( the powers that be ) merely think they run things. Now, when all that awaits us is death from nuclear bleed out, tptb ( the powers that be ) are somehow, far less scary.

Again, let us be deadly clear about our situation.

If Fukushima goes to the next level of meltdown, the result will be radiation poisoning at levels that will kill people rapidly.

Should fukushima go supercritical with the hoard of fuel rods, the resulting volcano of radiation will spew an umbrella of death over the northern hemisphere.

It will first kill those who work at high altitudes, such as pilots, and frequent air travelers, ski resort operators, high altitude hikers, and others.

Then it will settle down into lower levels of atmosphere, poisoning the planet on its way to the oceans.

This level of radiation potential will cause very rapid onset cancers, and ‘strange bleeding’, and ‘abnormal wasting’ conditions…all of which will have unexpectedly high death rates.

My bitch, if you read for content above, is that serious, deadly disaster is happening right now.

And lying about it is not helpful.

It would not be an issue, except that i get so many requests for my opinion about these lies….and think about it, the reason that i am getting those requests in the first place is that people are suspicious of what is being proffered as roses, but smells of manure.

Come on Ben, you are better than this.

In spite of the barriers in your mind to the concept, the radiation danger, to you, and all of us on this planet, is very very real.

If you have actual evidence that shows normal radiation levels in your area, please produce it as this anomoly needs to be investigated.

David, i don’t think you and i agree on the definition of ‘vetting’.

posted April 15, 2012 copyright clif high





US Congress Controlled By Corporations


From Alexander Higgins Blog

Posted by  – April 16, 2012

US Congress Controlled By Corporations

The US Congress has turned into a ‘puppet of the corporate machine’ and is being totally controlled by big corporations, says the President of Veterans for Peace.

Press TV – The comments were made by Leah Bolger, the Oregon-based president of the antiwar organization Veterans for Peace, who was sentenced to 60 days in jail for disrupting a Congress session, in an interview with Press TV’s US Desk on Sunday.

“On the 12th of April, I went to the court and I pleaded guilty to a charge of unlawful conduct of disruption of Congress. And I pleaded guilty because yes I did disrupt Congress and actually I wish I could have disrupted it more,” she said.

“I wish I could have changed the status quo that the Congress has become just a puppet of the corporate machine,” the anti-corporate activist added.

Bolger disrupted a public hearing of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction in the US Congress on October 26, 2011.

“I have come to understand what millions of Americans already know – that the actual majority will of the people is of little concern to those in power,” Bolger said in her defense statement to Judge Stuart Nash in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Washington.

She went on to say that nationwide campaigns against the excessive power of corporations in the US do not get anywhere because of “the power of the money coming from the lobbyists and corporate interests.”

“We can demonstrate and petition and write letters until we are blue in the face, but those actions are virtually worthless, as we can’t compete. Our voice is drowned out by the power of the money coming from the lobbyists and corporate interests. Money equals speech,” she pointed out.

The president of Veterans for Peace finally noted that she was speaking at the court “on behalf of 99 percent” of Americans.

The term 99-percenters is derived from the mantra “We are the 99 percent” used by anti-corporate protesters in the US who want to distinguish themselves from the one percent of Americans in possession of the greatest portion of the nation’s wealth.

The anti-corporate campaign in the United States erupted under the name of Occupy Wall Street on September 17, 2011 when a group of protesters marched toward the country’s financial center in protest against corporate greed and the excessive influence of corporations on the US political system.

Related Posts :





Video shows agonising TSA pat-down – as woman sobs in ‘sexual violation’ at hands of TSA agent


From MAIL online


          April 16, 2012

A traveller’s sobs were left ignored this weekend, as she was subjected to an invasive pat-down despite her cries – in another blow to the TSA.

A video posted to YouTube captures the weeping woman’s ordeal during the security checkpoint at an airport in Madison, Wisconsin.

Jim Hoft, who runs the political blog Gateway Pundit, posted the video on the site, as well as YouTube yesterday.

Scroll down for video

Shaken: The woman, who is not identified, can be heard sobbing as she's subjected to an invasive pat-down by a TSA agent

Shaken: The woman, who is not identified, can be heard sobbing as she’s subjected to an invasive pat-down by a TSA agent


Mr Hoft wrote: ‘This morning at a Midwest airport I witnessed this poor woman suffering through this horrible sexual violation’.

It’s the latest in a long line of disturbing behaviour during security checkpoints.

Loud sobs can be heard as the woman, wearing a pink sweater, is patted down by a female TSA agent.

The woman’s hands are shaking as the agent moves her hands down the woman’s legs.



The woman is then left alone, and can be seen hunching over, her arms crossed across her body in humiliation.

In his blog, Hoft raises the notion that the woman may be experiencing a post-traumatic stress episode.

Tense moment: The incident is the latest in a string of disturbing behaviour by the agency

Tense moment: The incident is the latest in a string of disturbing behaviour by the agency


In a statement to MailOnline on Monday, the TSA said it is committed to treating all passengers with respect and courtesy, and when a pat down is required, to do it as efficiently and unobtrusively as possible’.

The statement went on: ‘In this case, the passenger chose to receive a pat down rather than be screened using Millimeter Wave technology.  She was offered the opportunity to move to a private screening room, but declined.

‘Although TSA has not been contacted by this passenger, an internal review shows that our officer took extra time and care to explain the process before screening and during the pat down. The passenger completed the screening process and proceeded to the gate to board her flight’.

The TSA has come under intense scrutiny for the pat-down and body scanner policy in recent years, especially in the age of YouTube.

Ordeal: As the agent leaves, the woman hunches over with her arms across her chest in humiliation

Ordeal: As the agent leaves, the woman hunches over with her arms across her chest in humiliation


Last month, a clip on the video-sharing site showed a terrified eight-year-old boy confined to a wheelchair, trembling with fear as he was subjected to an invasive TSA pat-down.

Also last month, a new mom was forced to show security her freshly pumped breast milk before she could board a plane with a breast pump.

In February, a mother claimed she was subjected to repeated body scans after being told by agency employees that she ‘had a cute figure’.

These followed incidents last year, where TSA agents allegedly helped themselves to cake in a flier’s bag, and confiscated another’s cupcake.

Extra eyes: The TSA has come under scrutiny in the age of the internet over several incidents, some of which have been caught on tape and spread via sites like YouTube

Extra eyes: The TSA has come under scrutiny in the age of the internet over several incidents, some of which have been caught on tape and spread via sites like YouTube

In December, Indiana rapper Freddie Gibbs was flying to a gig in Denver with two large bags of marijuana in his bag.

But instead of confiscating it, the agent who inspected the bag instead left a note saying, ‘C’mon son’.

That same month, not one but two grandmothers came forward to say that they were mortified when they were ordered to be strip-searched during a security screening.

A TSA agent was fired in October after New York writer and lawyer Jill Filipovic found a note in her luggage (which contained a vibrator) that said: ‘Get your freak on girl’.

In May 2011, a bizarre photograph showing a baby being frisked by airport security caused outrage after it was posted online.


  • Last month, a YouTube clip showed a terrified eight-year-old boy confined to a wheelchair, trembling with fear as he was subjected to an invasive TSA pat-down as he cries to his dad.

  • Also last month, new mom Amy Strand was forced to show security her freshly pumped breast milk before she could board a plane with a breast pump.

  • In February, Ellen Terrell claimed she was subjected to repeated body scans after being told by agency employees that she ‘had a cute figure’.

  • In January, two TSA agents were out of the the job and jailed after they admitted to stealing $40,000 from a checked bag at JFK Airport in New York.

  • That same month, the agency was forced to apologise after two grandmothers in their 80s were subjected to mortifying strip searches.

  • Joe Maltese told MailOnline in December that cake in his luggage on a recent flight had a slice missing, allegedly taken by hungry bag-checkers.

  • Also in December, Indiana rapper Freddie Gibbs got away with smuggling some pot on a flight, but not without a handwritten TSA message: ‘C’mon son’.

  • Jenni ‘J-Woww’ Farley is known for brawls with her Jersey Shore castmates, but she took on the TSA in November when she complained on her Twitter account that she was ‘treated like a criminal’ when patted down during a trip to South Dakota.

  • In October, a TSA agent was dismissed from the job after leaving writer Jill Filipovic a similar handwritten note saying ‘Get your freak on girl’ in a bag that also contained a vibrator.

  • In August 2011, the agency was accused of racism after targeting the hair of two black women at airports in Seattle and San Antonio.

  • In May 2011, a photo made the rounds on the internet that showed – of all people – an infant being frisked by a thorough TSA agent.

Watch video here





Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~ Xaniel777



Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: