DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

REAL NEWS May 10, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on May 9, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : May 10, 2012

==================================================================================================

US Supreme Court: ‘law’ repugnant to the Constitution is void

 

From examiner.com

May 09, 2012

Carl Herman's photo

Nonpartisan Examiner

Subscribe

A useful place for Americans to stand is with the US Supreme Court in one of its most cited decisions that anything passed as law in obvious violation of the US Constitution is not law, but void. Void as a legal term means the alleged “law” has zero legal force; that “void things are as no things.”  

Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall’s crystal-clear wording is below.

This definitive legal ruling empowers Americans acting upon or enforcing such non-laws to reject them in full confidence of their Oaths to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic

=======================================

The 3-minute video asks police, military, and other law enforcement:

Police, Military – Was Your Oath Sincere :

Uploaded by  on Jan 17, 2012

To the Police & the Military,
When you signed up you took an oath to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, but did you ever actually read that document? Was your oath sincere, or were they just empty words?

To download this poster please go to http://waitingforthestorm.com/printable-poster-police-military-was-your-oath-…

A special thanks to Brandon from (Variations Graphic Design) who created the poster. You can check out how he made this on his channel :http://www.youtube.com/user/PsychoTerror915

. What’s amazing is that he’s only 16 years old and he’s not only aware of what’s going on he’s working to help change things!

========================

When you signed-up to serve the US Constitution, was your Oath sincere?

US military are authorized by their Oath of Enlistment and training to refuse unlawful orders, with officers authorized to arrest those who issue them. Given that US wars are unlawful because the US is treaty-bound to only use our military if under attack by another nation’s government, all current war orders are unlawful and should be refused. Military of civilian “leadership” who issue such orders should be arrested to immediately stop War Crimes.

Our peaceful and lawful 2nd American Revolution points to other “emperor has no clothes” obvious void laws and criminal acts:

  • assassination of Americans upon the non-reviewable dictate of the president,

  • control-drown/waterboarding anyone dictated as a “terrorist” despite all US and international case law finding this to be torture,

  • NDAA 2012 and 2006 Military Commissions Act that state a president can dictate any person as a “terrorist suspect,” and then disappear them without challenge,

  • presidential executive order saying the US government can seize any resource, any person, at any time for “national defense.”

  • US agencies’ official reports that show all “reasons” for war on Iraq were known to be false as they were told that are unacknowledged by the 1% and not prosecuted.

  • all “reasons” for war on Iran are easily and objectively proven as also false as they are being told in the present, yet the 1% continue to lie for war.

  • tripling of the US national debt since 2001 while we ignore obvious solutions to create money for full-employment and infrastructure investment (herehere, for examples). Pushing Americans into debt-slavery rather than using money is financial fraud.

  • the King Family civil trial found the US government guilty for the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. The King family’s conclusion of motive was to prevent Martin’s “Occupy DC” for the summer of 1968 until the Vietnam War was ended and that funding directed to ending poverty. The 1% never acknowledge this.

Here is the US Supreme Court’s ruling (my parenthetical notes and emphases):

The powers of the Legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the Constitution is written.

To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may at any time be passed by those intended to be restrained? 

The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed …

Between these alternatives (limited and unlimited government) there is no middle ground.

The Constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and, like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.

If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law; if the latter part be true, then written Constitutions are absurd attempts on the part of the people to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.

Certainly all those who have framed written Constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be that an act of the Legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void.

… So, if a law be in opposition to the Constitution, if both the law and the Constitution apply to a particular case, … those, then, who controvert the principle that the Constitution is to be considered in court as a paramount law are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the Constitution, and see only the law.

This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written Constitutions. It would declare that an act which, according to the principles and theory of our government, is entirely void, is yet, in practice, completely obligatory.

It would declare that, if the Legislature shall do what is expressly forbidden, such act, notwithstanding the express prohibition, is in reality effectual.

It would be giving to the Legislature a practical and real omnipotence with the same breath which professes to restrict their powers within narrow limits. It is prescribing limits, and declaring that those limits may be passed at pleasure.

That it thus reduces to nothing what we have deemed the greatest improvement on political institutions — a written Constitution, would of itself be sufficient, in America where written Constitutions have been viewed with so much reverence, for rejecting the construction.

But the peculiar expressions of the Constitution of the United States furnish additional arguments in favour of its rejection.

… Why otherwise does it direct … an oath to support it? This oath certainly applies in an especial manner to their conduct in their official character. How immoral to impose it on them if they were to be used as the instruments, and the knowing instruments, for violating what they swear to support!

The oath of office, too, imposed by the Legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on this subject. It is in these words:

I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States.

Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the Constitution of the United States if that Constitution forms no rule for his government? 

… If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe or to take this oath becomes equally a crime.

It is also not entirely unworthy of observation that, in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned, and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank.

Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument (the US Constitution).

And as Abraham Lincoln stated:

“The people — the people — are the rightful masters of both Congresses, and courts — not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it. –  “Abraham Lincoln, [September 16-17, 1859] (Notes for Speech in Kansas and Ohio),” Page 2.

END

 

 

 

 

The Real GOP Delegate Map The Media Won’t Show You

 

From Alexander Higgins Blog

  Posted by  – May 9, 2012

Even after Ron Paul had massive victories over the weekend, the media is still lying about the Romney delegate count so here is the latest real map.

The corporate media still is running story after story claiming Romney has a massive lead and Paul has few delegates.

Simply put, as the table below shows, the media is counting non-binding caucuses and states with mixed primaries as wins and delegates for Romney column.

The problem is the non-binding caucuses don’t mean a thing. Those non-binding caucuses are just that non-binding and the real delegate selection for many of these states hasn’t even happened yet.

As we saw over the weekend, Romney got romped by Paul in 3 states that the media had counted as Romney states based on the results of these non-binding caucuses.

But guess what? The media is still not updating their falsely reported delegate counts and are instead sticking to the story that Romney is way out a head.

In reality, Ron Paul has won the 5 states (actually he is winning 11 states now) needed to secure a spot at the GOP national convention but you won’ see those 5 states listed as wins on any corporate media list of delegate counts.

But putting aside the deception they are using to manufacture consent for Romney, here is the real 2012 GOP delegate map as provide by a Ron Paul supporter.

The Real GOP Delegate Map May 7 2012

 And here is a report from a real media outlet willing to tell the public the truth.

Also Notice how the media is still counting states such as Maine, Nevada, and many more for Romney even though he has officially lost these states over the weekend when the real delegates were selected.

The latest update from Business Insider:

Republicans Are Finally Getting Nervous About Ron Paul’s Secret Delegate Strategy

For several weeks I have been writing about Ron Paul’s upset victories at district and state GOP conventions, and about the surprising success of his delegate strategy. Now, with Paul’s delegate sweeps in Maine and Nevada, it looks like Mitt Romney and the Republican Party are finally starting to catch on to the trend.

Paul supporters swept this weekend’s state GOP conventions, picking up 21 of 24 RNC delegates in Maine and 22 out of 28 delegates in Nevada. The twin victories come on the heels of Paul’s surprise delegate wins at district caucuses and state conventions in Missouri, Minnesota, Colorado, and Louisiana, as well as a Paul-friendly takeover of the Alaska GOP.

Paul supporters have managed to stage these state-level coups despite significant resistance from local Establishment Republicans, many of whom are predictably reluctant to relinquish their power to the insurgents.

So far, however, the Paul campaign has attributed most of the Establishment’s “shenanigans” to local animosities.

But there is growing evidence that the Romney camp — and the national GOP — are stepping up their efforts to prevent an embarrassing Ron Paul uprising on the floor of the Republican National Convention.

In Maine, for example, the Romney campaign dispatched its top lawyer, Benjamin Ginsberg, to oversee the state convention proceedings this weekend. (It’s worth noting that Ginsberg is best known for his work for George W. Bush during the 2000 Florida recount.)

 

Ginsberg’s presence didn’t stop the convention from descending into chaos, with both sides accusing the other of breaking party rules with phony ballots and illegal delegate votes. (The Kennebec Journal has a colorful account of the madness here.)

Ultimately, Paul supporters out-numbered and out-organized their Romney counterparts, winning the majority of the state’s RNC delegates, as well as both RNC Committee Chair posts and 34 out of 50 open spots on the state party committee.

Romney supporters have pledged to mount a legal challenge to the results with the Republican National Committee.

In Nevada, the Paul sweep was largely expected — the Silver State has been a Ron Paul stronghold since the 2008 election, when the state GOP  literally turned off the lights at their convention to avoid seating Ron Paul delegates to the national convention.

Since then, Paul supporters have won elections to local and county GOP boards, and are now major players in state Republican politics.

“The Establishment is us now,” Ron Paul’s Nevada campaign director Carl Bunce told Business Insider before this weekend’s convention. “If we turn off the lights, we know where the light switch is.”

But Nevada’s Paul-friendly party Establishment didn’t stop the Republican National Committee from trying to stop Paul’s acolytes from completing their takeover this weekend.

In a letter obtained by the Las Vegas Sun last week, the RNC’s lawyer warned that the national party could unseat Nevada’s convention delegation in Tampa if the state party elected too many Ron Paul supporters as delegates.

Romney is also apparently keen not to avoid a second embarrassment in Iowa, a state where Paul continues to make significant inroads.

At the Republican National Committee summit in Phoenix last month, Romney aides tried to force Iowa’s three-person RNC delegation to sign a “loyalty pledge” promising to vote for Romney at the national convention.

Iowa GOP Chair AJ Spiker, a former state director for the Paul campaign, told Business Insider that the Romney camp backed down after he and the two Iowa RNC chairs refused to sign the pledge.

Privately, sources close to the Ron Paul campaign say they believe Republicans will continue to ramp up his efforts to block Paul delegates at state conventions, particularly after Romney’s embarrassing delegate losses in Massachusetts.

But state organizers tell Business Insider that Paul supporters are significantly more organized than Romney’s delegate team, and are ready to put up a tough fight in states like Idaho and Washington.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/ron-paul-wins-maine-nevada-republicans-mitt-romney-finally-getting-nervous-2012-5#ixzz1uNrOC6Hm

How The Media Falsely reports 2012 Republican Delegates

1) Non-binding caucuses are being scored for Romney. It’s a lie. Non-Binding caucuses are just that – non-binding which means they are not Romney’s delegates
2) It was previously confirmed that Paul won at 5 states and is heading to the GOP national convention, and now he has the majority of delegates in 11 states.

Yet the following list from Real Clear Politics which is basically the same lie being echoed elsewhere in the media show Ron Paul only winning 1 state and only 93 delegates. There math clearly doesn’t add up.

State

Date

Delegates

Romney

Santorum

Gingrich

Paul

Delegate Allocation

Open/Closed

RCP Total

2,286

865

270

144

93

Iowa

Jan 3

28

6

7

0

1

Non-Binding Caucus

Closed

New Hampshire

Jan 10

12*

7

0

0

3

Proportional Primary

Open

South Carolina

Jan 21

25*

2

0

23

0

Winner Take All Primary1

Open

Florida

Jan 31

50*

50

0

0

0

Winner Take All Primary

Closed

Nevada

Feb 4

28

14

3

6

5

Proportional Caucus1

Closed

Minnesota

Feb 7

40

2

17

1

20

Non-Binding Caucus

Open

Colorado

Feb 7

36

19

6

2

3

Non-Binding Caucus

Closed

Maine

Feb 11

24

10

4

0

8

Non-Binding Caucus

Closed

Michigan

Feb 28

30*

16

14

0

0

Hybrid Primary2

Closed

Arizona

Feb 28

29*

29

0

0

0

Winner Take All Primary

Closed

Wyoming

Feb 29

29

12

7

1

6

Non-Binding Caucus

Closed

Washington

Mar 3

43

25

7

0

8

Non-Binding Caucus

Closed

Georgia

Mar 6

76

19

3

52

0

Proportional Primary1

Open

Ohio

Mar 6

66

38

21

0

0

Proportional Primary1,3

Open

Tennessee

Mar 6

58

16

29

10

0

Proportional Primary1,3

Open

Virginia

Mar 6

49

43

0

0

3

Hybrid Primary2,3

Open

Oklahoma

Mar 6

43

13

14

13

0

Proportional Primary1,3

Closed

Massachusetts

Mar 6

41

38

0

0

0

Proportional Primary1

Open

Idaho

Mar 6

32

32

0

0

0

Proportional Caucus3

Closed

North Dakota

Mar 6

28

7

11

2

8

Non-Binding Caucus

Closed

Alaska

Mar 6

27

8

8

2

6

Proportional Caucus

Closed

Vermont

Mar 6

17

9

4

0

4

Hybrid Primary2

Open

Kansas

Mar 10

40

7

33

0

0

Hybrid Primary2

Closed

Guam

Mar 10

9

6

0

0

0

Non-Binding Caucus

Closed

Northern Marianas

Mar 10

9

6

0

0

0

Non-Binding Caucus

Closed

Virgin Islands

Mar 10

9

4

0

0

1

Non-Binding Caucus

Closed

Alabama

Mar 13

50

11

22

12

0

Proportional Primary3

Open

Mississippi

Mar 13

40

12

13

12

0

Proportional Primary1

Open

Hawaii

Mar 13

20

9

5

0

3

Proportional Caucus1

Closed

American Samoa

Mar 13

9

9

0

0

0

Proportional Caucus

Open

Puerto Rico

Mar 18

23

20

0

0

0

Proportional Primary3

Open

Illinois

Mar 20

69

42

12

0

0

Direct Election

Open

Louisiana

Mar 24

46

5

10

0

0

Proportional Primary1

Closed

Wisconsin

Apr 3

42

33

9

0

0

Winner Take All Primary1

Open

Maryland

Apr 3

37

37

0

0

0

Winner Take All Primary1

Closed

District of Columbia

Apr 3

19

16

0

0

0

Winner Take All Primary

Closed

Missouri

Apr 21

52

12

7

1

4

Non-Binding Caucus

Open

New York

Apr 24

95

92

0

0

0

Proportional Primary3

Closed

Pennsylvania

Apr 24

72

27

3

3

5

Direct Election

Closed

Connecticut

Apr 24

28

25

0

0

0

Hybrid Primary2,3

Closed

Rhode Island

Apr 24

19

12

0

0

4

Proportional Primary

Open

Delaware

Apr 24

17

17

0

0

0

Winner Take All Primary

Closed

North Carolina

May 8

55

Proportional Primary

Open

Indiana

May 8

46

Hybrid Primary/Caucus1

Open

West Virginia

May 8

31

Direct Election

Open

Nebraska

May 15

35

Non-Binding Primary

Open

Oregon

May 15

28

Proportional Primary1

Closed

Kentucky

May 22

45

Proportional Primary1

Closed

Arkansas

May 22

36

Proportional Primary

Open

Texas

May 29

155

Proportional Primary1

Open

California

Jun 5

172

Winner Take All Primary1

Closed

New Jersey

Jun 5

50

Winner Take All Primary1

Open

South Dakota

Jun 5

28

Proportional Primary

Closed

Montana

Jun 5

26

Non-Binding Primary

Closed

New Mexico

Jun 5

23

Proportional Primary

Closed

Utah

Jun 26

40

Winner Take All Primary

Open

Unpledged RNC

0

48

1

4

1

Open

Related Posts :

END

 

 

 

 

How to prepare for the collapse even on a tight budget

 

From Natural News

May 09, 2012 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer

(NaturalNews) Preparing for the inevitable collapse of society as we know it can be a daunting task, particularly when it means forking over wads of cash to purchase expensive preparedness supplies in the midst of a flailing economy.

But Brandon Smith from Alt-Market.com has put together a helpful piece entitled The Poor Man’s Guide to Survival Gear that we think might be useful in helping our readers to make informed, rational, and frugal preparedness purchasing decisions.

With so many companies and stores now selling preparedness supplies — heck, even warehouse wholesaler Costco now sells an emergency food kit — it can be confusing to sort through and discern which supplies are actually useful, and which ones are just overpriced, fear-based hype.

To help simplify this process, consider the following useful tips:

A “bug-out” bag, complete with warm, weatherproof, and water-resistant clothing is an absolute must for any preparedness situation. But these items can be costly if you do not know what to look for, and where to look for it.

Smith recommends buying military surplus goods like an Alice Pack (http://www.google.com), for instance, which is a far cheaper bug-out bag than, say, a designer hiking backpack you might find at a place like REI.

Along the same lines, Smith recommends frequenting military surplus stores and suppliers for other necessary goods like waterproof jackets, winter coats, combat boots, and knives.

These items can often be found used for a fraction of their original price, and even when new, they are typically far less expensive than similar items found at sporting goods stores and online preparedness websites.

Generating energy for heat and cooking during a crisis is tricky, especially when sources of liquid fuel are in short supply. This is why Smith recommends buying a wood-burning stove like the M-1941 Military Tent Stove.

Unless you can afford to invest in solar energy production systems and battery backup generators, wood-burning stoves are a great alternative that will allow you a virtually unlimited supply of free energy for generating heat.

But even solar panels are less expensive than most people probably think they are, as advances in solar technology and more widespread use has led to a continuing decline in production costs, which means less expensive products for consumers.

Smith recommends purchasing a 180-watt solar panel, a deep-cycle battery, a charge controller, and an inverter. Such systems can be purchased in a kit for as little as $600, and are capable of fully powering necessary appliances in the event of a crisis.

Be sure to check out Smith’s full list of preparedness advice and recommendations at: http://www.shtfplan.com

You can also check out his survivalist page at:
http://www.alt-market.com/

Also, be sure to check out the Health Ranger’s internet seminar How To Protect and Defend Yourself. This preparedness course, which isstreamed on demand, will teach you valuable survival skills and how to protect yourself and your family in the event of a collapse:
www.HealthRangerLIVE.com

Articles Related to This Article:

Burning down the house – the coming global financial firestorm

Should you leave the USA before the collapse? Words of wisdom from someone who tried

14 signs that the collapse of our modern world has already begun

Just launched: Surthrival Series features Daniel Vitalis, Health Ranger teaching lifesaving principles of urban preparedness

Breakthrough honeybee drugs to treat Colony Collapse Disorder (satire)

Financial Collapse

END

 

 

 

 

‘It will lead to war’ – Ron Paul fights to end military aid for Israel

From RT NEWS

Republican presidential candidate, U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (AFP Photo / Ethan Miller)

Republican presidential candidate, U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (AFP Photo / Ethan Miller)

Presidential hopeful Ron Paul has condemned a plan being considered in the United States House of Representatives that would allow for the US to continue aiding in the defense of Israel by equipping the Jewish state’s military with added weaponry.

From Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) attacked the contents of an act currently up for discussion that, if passed, would reestablish America’s major role in Israeli affairs. Rep Paul fears, however, that it would do more harm than good for all nations involved.

To House Speak John Boehner, Paul said that H.R. 4133, the United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012, “is another piece of one-sided and counter-productive foreign policy legislation.”

“This bill’s real intent seems to be more saber-rattling against Iran and Syria,” insisted Paul, “and it undermines US diplomatic efforts by making clear that the US is not an honest broker seeking peace for the Middle East.”

“The bill calls for the United States to significantly increase our provision of sophisticated weaponry to Israel, and states that it is to be US policy to ‘help Israel preserve its qualitative military edge’ in the region,” added the congressman.

The bill itself was created to reaffirm America’s commitment to Israel’s security as a Jewish state,” “provide Israel with the military capabilities to defend itself,” “expand military and civil cooperation” and “encourage Israel’s neighbors to recognize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state,” among other matters according to the official synapsis included in the legislation.

It was introduced in March by Rep. Eric Cantor and discussed for around one hour on Wednesday afternoon before a motion to reconsider was laid on the table and agreed without objection.

Explaining his opposition, Rep. Paul told his fellow lawmakers that “While I absolutely believe that Israel – and any other nation – should be free to determine for itself what is necessary for its national security, I do not believe that those decisions should be underwritten by US taxpayers and backed up by the US military.”

“This bill states that it is the policy of the United States to ‘reaffirm the enduring commitment of the United States to the security of the State of Israel as a Jewish state,’” said the congressman. “However, according to our Constitution the policy of the United States government should be to protect the security of the United States, not to guarantee the religious, ethnic, or cultural composition of a foreign country. In fact, our own Constitution prohibits the establishment of any particular religion in the US.”

“This bill will not help the United States, it will not help Israel, and it will not help the Middle East,” concluded Paul. It will implicitly authorize much more US interventionism in the region at a time when we cannot afford the foreign commitments we already have. It more likely will lead to war against Syria, Iran, or both. I urge my colleagues to vote against this bill.”

END

 

 

 

 

CIA Thwarts Own New Underwear Bomber Plot, Continues Trend of Manufactured Terror

 

From The Intel Hub

By Madison Ruppert
theintelhub.com
May 9, 2012

Another day, another blatant instance of manufactured terrorism courtesy of the U.S. government, in this case the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

I assume that my readers are already astute enough to see this case as nothing more than yet another attempt to justify the American police state, the expansive big brother policies and technology and the fraudulent war on terror while also pushing for nations around the world to pick up even more of the U.S.’s destructive policies.

Of course just earlier this month the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) foiled their fabricated plot as well.

I went over this in the below ten minute video, along with the history of these types of operations:

Surprised? You shouldn’t be. In fact, this has become the norm for the law enforcement and intelligence communities.

After all, they’re protecting their jobs. If the people of the United States of America realize that there is no real terrorist threat, the massive homeland security business begins to wither away.

Even more importantly, it completely removes the need for the unbelievably expansive American surveillance state headed up by the Department of Homeland Security and the many child agencies under their direction.

Oddly enough, the establishment media is spinning this story in the CIA’s favor, with the Associated Press opening up a story on the subject by writing, “The CIA had al-Qaida fooled from the beginning.”

Last month, American intelligence agencies supposedly became aware of Yemen’s al Qaeda affiliate group’s intention to carry out “a spectacular attack using a new, nearly undetectable bomb aboard an airliner bound for America, officials say.”

Unsurprisingly, the individual the terrorist group tapped was an asset of the CIA and Saudi intelligence.

Details are not all too plentiful just yet and the officials who spoke to the Associated Press did so anonymously.

However, we do know that the FBI is currently analyzing the explosive which was supposedly to be concealed in underwear.

Officials claimed that this device was an improved version of the bomb given to the so-called “underwear bomber” in 2009.

For those who do not remember, this case of a failed attempt to ignite explosive underwear surrounded a young man whose father attempted to warn the U.S. of his radicalization on several occasions.

A passenger on the plane, practicing attorney Kurt Haskell, testified that the bomber was escorted on to the plane by a still unknown individual.

One of the most powerful statements he made during his five minutes of testimony was the following:

“In closing I will just say that regardless of how the media and government try to shape the public perception of this case, I am convinced that Umar [Abdulmutallab, the so-called underwear bomber] was given an intentionally defective bomb by a U.S. Government agent and placed on our flight without showing a passport or going through security, to stage a false terrorist attack to be used to implement various government policies.”

Of course this case was used to push the potentially dangerous body scanners on the American people, for which they previously had no viable justification.

It remains to be seen if this is used, as the underwear bomber case and so-called shoe bomber case both were, to push some new, invasive technology or policy on the American people.

This comes as Senator Rand Paul is pushing to dissolve the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) completely while they continue to expand operations outside of airports and into the daily lives of Americans with no reason to do so.

When the American people begin to become increasingly intolerant of the TSA’s invasive tactics and dehumanizing treatment as well as the never-ending global war on terror, there has to be something done to keep us believing that this is for our own good.

This farcical case of manufactured terrorism is just another example of this principle at work. Without the CIA keeping us safe by foiling their own bomb plots, we might have real bomb plots, right?

Or, perhaps, the more logical conclusion would be that without these manufactured bomb plots, there would actually be no bomb plots.

Indeed, we see the Associated Press revealing the true motives behind this engineered plot in their article when they write:

“Security procedures at U.S. airports remained unchanged Tuesday, a reflection of both the U.S. confidence in its security systems and a recognition that the government can’t realistically expect travelers to endure much more. […] While airline checks in the United States mean passing through an onerous, sometimes embarrassing series of pat-downs and body scans, procedures overseas can be a mixed bag.”

What I gather from this is that the U.S. might begin pushing other countries to implement similarly demeaning and dehumanizing tactics in their countries as well, supposedly because their lack of grope-downs makes the U.S. vulnerable.

While the AP admits that the United States cannot actually force any other nation “to permanently adopt the expensive and intrusive measures that have become common in American airports over the past decade,” they do write that the TSA has “sent advice to some international air carriers and airports about security measures that might stave off an attack from a hidden explosive.”

Apparently the U.S. has issued this exact same advice before but this newest manufactured plot is expected to draw new attention to this “advice” which will likely end up much more closely resembling a demand based on how the U.S. has operated in recent years.

Indeed, officials are already claiming that body scanners could have detected this explosive device, which means that they will likely be pushing more nations around the globe to accept these costly, potentially dangerous and ineffective devices.

The AP writes, “Such scanners allow screeners to see objects hidden beneath a passenger’s clothes,” which is laughable seeing as a blogger was able to easily circumvent these ludicrously expensive devices.

As I said before, it remains to be seen how this will actually be leveraged in the government’s favor, but I think it is safe to assume that in one way or another, it will be.

Did I forget anything or miss any errors? Would you like to make me aware of a story or subject to cover? Or perhaps you want to bring your writing to a wider audience? Feel free to contact me at admin@EndtheLie.com with your concerns, tips, questions, original writings, insults or just about anything that may strike your fancy.

Note from End the Lie: Please support our work and help us start to pay contributors by doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.

This article originally appeared on End the Lie

END

 

 

 

 

Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: