DaniMartExtras, Too


REAL NEWS May 24, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on May 23, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : May 24, 2012


A question about why none of the Elite are being arrested yet 


From Benjamin Fulford’s Blog

May 23, 2012


Response to a question about why nobody is being arrested and other reasonable doubts about what is really going on. 

( Name withheld )


First of all, you are right that nobody is getting arrested and that is very frustrating.

However, it is an objective fact that an alliance of 140 nations is against the warmongering group of 28 nations.

It is called the BRICS or non-aligned group.

The financial crisis is about those countries refusing to finance the Western banking elite in an attempt to force them to stop war. 

You are also right to worry that one secret group is just trying to replace another secret group.

However, The White Dragon Society believes in total transparency and freedom of information.

Also, please take note that nobody has been dragged off to concentration camps, and that World War 3 has not started despite their attempts to make this happen.

Have no doubt, these people are not going to go quietly into the night but they are going to go. 

Finally, instead of complaining that nothing is being done, please personally take action and stop waiting like a sheep for someone else to do it for you. 

Benjamin F.






Zuckerberg cashed in $1.13 BILLION worth of his personal shares BEFORE stock cratered


{ XANIEL’S NOTE : Anyone who can not see ‘ BY NOW ‘,  that this was and is Investment Fraud orchestrated by the Wall Street Banksters and Zuckerberg to make overwhelming money at the expense of  ‘ John Q Investor ‘, is just to brainwashed  and stupid.

And as sad as it is, they are brainwashed and stupid to the point that they will forever be a sheeple, slave and mark to these criminals, for the rest of their pathetic lives !…. ( Hence the term sheeple…’ …being lead to slaughter…’ )

It’s time to arrest these overzealous and arrogant fraudsters once and for all !!}~~Xaniel777 


From Mail Online


23 May 2012

Mark Zuckerberg and leading Facebook investors cashed out millions of shares before the price dropped off a cliff, according to company filings.

It was also revealed that a company executive issued a warning days before the Initial Public Offering that Facebook;s revenues are lower than expected, information that would have likely dropped the opening price of the stock. 

The new reports are already raising questions about whether top investors profited from the IPO at the expense of smaller buyers.

Mark Zuckerberg

Zucked: Mark Zuckerberg saved $174 million by cashing out tens of millions of shares of Facebook stock early Friday when the price was above $38 a share

On Wednesday shareholders filed a lawsuit against Facebook and the banks behind the company’s stock, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. 

Additionally, both the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority have begun looking into the matter. 

The US Senate Banking Committee has also launched an inquiry and the state of Massachusetts has subpoenaed Morgan Stanley, demanding answers.

Facebook stock rose 3.3 percent in trading on Wednesday, rising to $32 a share. 

However, a new analysis said the stock could fall to as low as $9.59.

That’s a far cry from the $37.58 that Zuckerberg fetched for 30.2 million shares he unloaded on Friday.

The founder of the social networking website made $1.13billion on the sale.

Mark Zuckerberg

Faceplant: Some analysts have speculated that price of stock in the company could fall to $9.59 a share as investors realize they fell victim to hype in the Initial Public Offering

By the end of trading on Tuesday however the price had dropped to $31 meaning Zuckerberg saved himself a cool $174 million by getting out early.

The 28-year-old still holds a vast amount of Facebook stock but his decision to sell off so much will leave investors wondering about his confidence in the company.

The drop is based around the realization that Facebook might not be growing as quickly as initially thought. And the company’s second-quarter growth will likely fall short of expectations as fewer new users join the social networking giant. 

Shareholders filed a lawsuit on Wednesday, alleging that Zuckerberg, Facebook and the banks that backed the Initial Public Offering, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, knew this information, but weren’t forthcoming with it.

On Tuesday, Reuters revealed that the banks’ analysts downgraded their estimates about the future earnings of the company while they were rolling out the IPO. 

Business Insider called the move ‘unprecedented.’

Furthermore, the website reported that the banks revealed to privileged major investors that the share price was likely to tank, but left smaller stock buyers in the dark about this information.


Here is a list of the early investors in Facebook who made a bundle by cashing in portions of their stock Friday before share prices tumbled.

Value is estimated at $38 a share. Also included is how much money each saved by getting out Friday, before shares sunk to $31.

Mark Zuckerberg

Shares sold: 30.2 million

Value: $1.13 billion

Saved: $174 million

Accel Partners, venture capital investor

Year invested in Facebook: 2005 for $12.7 million

Shares sold: 49 million

Value: $1.86 billion

Saved: $341 million

Peter Thiel, PayPal co-founder

Year invested in Facebook: 2004 for $500,000

Shares sold: 16.8 million

Value: $640 million

Saved: $119 million

DST Global Ltd, investment firm based in London and founded by Russian oligarch

Year invested in Facebook: 2009 and late 2010 for $200 million

Shares sold: 45.7 million

Value: $1.74 billion

Saved: $323 million

Goldman Sachs, investment bank

Year invested in Facebook: 2011 for $450 million

Shares sold: 28.7 million

Value: $1.09 billion

Saved: $200 million

Elevation Partners, private equity firm with Bono as spokesman

Shares sold: 4.6 million

Value: $176 million

Saved: $3.3 million

Greylock Partners, venture capital investor

Year invested in Facebook: 2006 for $27.5 million

Shares sold: 7.6 million

Value: $289 million

Saved: 53.4 million

The Securities and Exchange commission is investigating these allegations and the state of Massachusetts has filed a subpoena demanding Morgan Stanley release information about the IPO.

Zuckerberg’s plans to sell were revealed in documents filed in advance of the IPO on Friday, but the problems that have happened since cast them in a new light. 

 Venture capitalist Peter Thiel also announced his plans early too but his return was beyond anything he could have hoped for.

He wrote Zuckerberg a cheque for $500,000 in 2004 but has offloaded 16.8 million shares for the tidy profit of $633 million.

Among the others to cash out was Mark Pincus, the chief executive of online gaming company Zynga.

Eight years ago he gave Facebook a cheque for $40,000 but now has sold $38 million worth of stock.

Venture capitalists Accel Partners, which handed over $12.7million back in 2005, sold $1.9billion of stock but retained $5.8billion.

PayPal co-founder and former CEO Peter Thiel
Zynga CEO Mark Pincus

 Big returns: Peter Thiel (above), the co-founder of PayPal, earned $633 million for an initial investment of $500,000. Zynga CEO Mark Pincus gave Zuckerberg a check for $40,000 in 2004 and cashed in $38 million in stock

Whilst the big players were making a fortune however, small investors have seen their attempts to get in on the Facebook bubble fall flat.

As of close of trading on Tuesday shares were a staggering 18 per cent below what they had been at the opening on Friday.

At one point they had slumped 31 per cent from the $45 peak hit shortly after they started trading.

But according to analysts StarMine this could not be the end of it and the slide could carry on until stocks are just $9.59 each.

It has examined estimates from Wall Street experts and concluded that Facebook is currently vastly overpriced, though its forecasts do tend to be gloomier than others.

Eddy Elfenbein, editor at finance website Crossing Wall Street, said: ‘Facebook right now is going for far more than what it’s worth, it’s like buying $1 for $1.98, it just doesn’t make sense at this price.

‘Just from basic modelling the stock should be around $17 to $20, and that is with a lot of variables.’


Cleaning up: Facebook’s IPO has caused a mess that is currently being investigated by the Senate Banking Committee, two regulatory agencies and the state of Massachusetts

‘I would call that an ideal price. I would be interested in buying and I think that is a good deal for investors.’

Among those who did not cash out on Friday when Facebook shares were trading at $38 each was the company’s former president Sean Parker.

His stock is still worth over $2billion but the price slump meant his fortune decreased by a staggering $300million.

In a sign of how feeling is changing against Facebook, some commentators have begun comparing its activities to the most reckless behaviour of Wall Street banks.

They have also coined the word ‘Zucked’, which means to get shafted on the sale of Facebook shares.

In a withering article in Time magazine Sam Gustin wrote: ‘Facebook’s highly-vaunted IPO — which was supposed to be a shining moment for the social network, as well as its lead banker Morgan Stanley and the Nasdaq exchange

– has morphed into a debacle that’s reinforced some of the worst stereotypes about Wall Street: that corporate executives and their bankers engineer IPOs to maximize profits at the public’s expense;

that Wall Street’s own systems have become too complex for its personnel to handle; and that the entire game is a hype-fueled casino, rigged for the house with a sucker played by the average investor.’

Times Square

Hyped: The Facebook IPO was one of the most widely-anticipated stock offers in recent history

These major sell-offs comes as new allegations are emerging the the over-hyped Facebook stock sale may have been rigged against small, every-day buyers. 

Two separates lawsuits have been filed against the company and the banks that organized the IPO, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, alleging the executives knew second-quarter revenue would not meet expectations as Facebook’s growth slows.

Business Insider says this information was shared with the banks by a Facebook insider. As Zuckerberg went on his pre-IPO roadshow, touting his company, the banks downgraded their revenue projections for Facebook. 

This information could have reduced the value of Facebook’s initial stock offering. In turn, this could have decreased the amount of money Zuckerberg and his early investors made when they dumped tens of millions of Facebook shares on Friday as trading opened. 

However, the banks failed to widely disclose the downgrade, the lawsuits say. 

Business Insider says they told only large, institutional investors so they would know to stay away from Facebook stock on the first day of trading.

Facebook denies the allegations in the lawsuit and said it will ‘vigorously defense itself.’

Morgan Stanley says it followed the same procedure it would for any IPO.

Read more:

         *  Zuckerberg faces shareholders mutiny as they SUE Facebook and banks over claims real cost of company was kept secret before IPO








{ XANIEL’S NOTE : This is not a new story and we have run it before, but it is more relevant now than ever before. Read it in it’s entirety to see how the Elite have manage to fool and control us for so many, many years! }~~ Xaniel777  


From WhatReallyHappened.com

By Mike Rivero


It’s the oldest trick in the book, dating back to Roman times; creating the enemies you need.

In 70 BC, an ambitious minor politician and extremely wealthy man, Marcus Licinius Crassus, wanted to rule Rome.

Just to give you an idea of what sort of man Crassus really was, he is credited with invention of the fire brigade.

But in Crassus’ version, his fire-fighting slaves would race to the scene of a burning building whereupon Crassus would offer to buy it on the spot for a tiny fraction of its worth.

If the owner sold, Crassus’ slaves would put out the fire.

If the owner refused to sell, Crassus allowed the building to burn to the ground.

By means of this device, Crassus eventually came to be the largest single private land holder in Rome, and used some of his wealth to help back Julius Caesar against Cicero.

In 70 BC Rome was still a Republic, which placed very strict limits on what Rulers could do, and more importantly NOT do.

But Crassus had no intentions of enduring such limits to his personal power, and contrived a plan.

Crassus seized upon the slave revolt led by Spartacus in order to strike terror into the hearts of Rome, whose garrison Spartacus had already defeated in battle.

But Spartacus had no intention of marching on Rome itself, a move he knew to be suicidal.

Spartacus and his band wanted nothing to do with the Roman empire and had planned from the start merely to loot enough money from their former owners in the Italian countryside to hire a mercenary fleet in which to sail to freedom.



Sailing away was the last thing Crassus wanted Spartacus to do. He needed a convenient enemy with which to terrorize Rome itself for his personal political gain.



So Crassus bribed the mercenary fleet to sail without Spartacus, then positioned two Roman legions in such a way that Spartacus had no choice but to march on Rome.

Terrified of the impending arrival of the much-feared army of gladiators, Rome declared Crassus Praetor.

Crassus then crushed Spartacus’ army and even though Pompey took the credit, Crassus was elected Consul of Rome the following year.


With this maneuver, the Romans surrendered their Republican form of government.

Soon would follow the first Triumvirate, consisting of Crassus, Pompeii, and Julius Caesar, followed by the reign of the god-like Emperors of Rome.

The Romans were hoaxed into surrendering their Republic, and accepting the rule of Emperors.

Julius Caesar’s political opponent, Cicero, for all his literary accomplishments, played the same games in his campaign against Julius Caesar, claiming that Rome was falling victim to an internal “vast right wing” conspiracy in which any expressed desire for legislative limits on government was treated as suspicious behavior.

Cicero, in order to demonstrate to the Romans just how unsafe Rome has become hired thugs to cause as much disturbance as possible, and campaigned on a promise to end the internal strife if elected and granted extraordinary powers.

What Cicero only dreamed of, Adolph Hitler succeeded in doing.

Elected Chancellor of Germany, Hitler, like Crassus, had no intention of living with the strict limits to his power imposed by German law.

Unlike Cicero, Hitler’s thugs were easy to recognize; they all wore the same brown shirts.

But their actions were no different than those of their Roman predecessors.

They staged beatings, set fires, caused as much trouble as they could, while Hitler made speeches promising that he could end the crime wave of subversives and terrorism if he was granted extraordinary powers.

Then the Reichstag burned down; a staged terrorist attack.

The Germans were hoaxed into surrendering their Republic, and accepting the total rule of Der Fuehrer.

Hitler had German troops dressed in Polish uniforms attack the radio station at Gleiwitz, then lied to the Germans, telling them Poland had invaded, and marched Germany off into World War Two

The state-sponsored schools will never tell you this, but governments routinely rely on hoaxes to sell their agendas to an otherwise reluctant public.

The Romans accepted the Emperors and the Germans accepted Hitler not because they wanted to, but because the carefully crafted illusions of threat appeared to leave no other choice.

Our government too uses hoaxes to create the illusion that We The People have no choice but the direction the government wishes us to go in.


In 1898, Joseph Pulitzer’s New York World and William Randolph Hearst’s New York Journal were arguing for American intervention in Cuba.

Hearst is reported to have dispatched a photographer to Cuba to photograph the coming war with Spain.

When the photographer asked just what war that might be, Hearst is reported to have replied, “You take the photographs, and I will provide the war”.

Hearst was true to his word, as his newspaper published stories of great atrocities being committed against the Cuban people, most of which turned out to be complete fabrications.

On the night of February 15, 1898, the USS Maine, lying in Havana harbor in a show of US resolve to protect her interests, exploded violently.

Captain Sigsbee, the commander of the Maine, urged that no assumptions of enemy attack be made until there was a full investigation of the cause of the explosion.

For this, Captain Sigsbee was excoriated in the press for “refusing to see the obvious”.

The Atlantic Monthly declared flat out that to suppose the explosion to be anything other than a deliberate act by Spain was “completely at defiance of the laws of probability”.

Under the slogan “Remember the Maine”, Americans went to war with Spain, eventually winning the Philippines (and annexing Hawaii along the way).

In 1975, an investigation led by Admiral Hyman Rickover examined the data recovered from a 1911 examination of the wreck and concluded that there had been no evidence of an external explosion.

The most likely cause of the sinking was a coal dust explosion in a coal bunker imprudently located next to the ship’s magazines. Captain Sigsbee’s caution had been well founded.


President Franklin Delano Roosevelt needed a war.

He needed the fever of a major war to mask the symptoms of a still deathly ill economy struggling back from the Great Depression (and mutating towards Socialism at the same time).

Roosevelt wanted a war with Germany to stop Hitler, but despite several provocations in the Atlantic, the American people, still struggling with that troublesome economy, were opposed to any wars.

Roosevelt violated neutrality with lend lease, and even ordered the sinking of several German ships in the Atlantic, but Hitler refused to be provoked.

Roosevelt needed an enemy, and if America would not willingly attack that enemy, then one would have to be maneuvered into attacking America, much as Marcus Licinius Crassus has maneuvered Spartacus into attacking Rome.

The way open to war was created when Japan signed the tripartite agreement with Italy and Germany, with all parties pledging mutual defense to each other.

Whereas Hitler would never declare war on the United States no matter the provocation, the means to force Japan to do so were readily at hand.

The first step was to place oil and steel embargoes on Japan, using Japan’s wars on the Asian mainland as a reason.

This forced Japan to consider seizing the oil and mineral rich regions in Indonesia.

With the European powers militarily exhausted by the war in Europe, the United States was the only power in the Pacific able to stop Japan from invading the Dutch East Indies, and by moving the Pacific fleet from San Diego to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, Roosevelt made a pre-emptive strike on that fleet the mandatory first step in any Japanese plan to extend its empire into the “southern resource area”.

Roosevelt boxed in Japan just as completely as Crassus had boxed in Spartacus. Japan needed oil.

They had to invade Indonesia to get it, and to do that they first had to remove the threat of the American fleet at Pearl Harbor.

There never really was any other course open to them.

To enrage the American people as much as possible, Roosevelt needed the first overt attack by Japan to be as bloody as possible, appearing as a sneak attack much as the Japanese had done to the Russians.

From that moment up until the attack on Pearl Harbor itself, Roosevelt and his associates made sure that the commanders in Hawaii, General Short and Admiral Kimmel, were kept in the dark as much as possible about the location of the Japanese fleet and its intentions, then later scapegoated for the attack.

(Congress recently exonerated both Short and Kimmel, posthumously restoring them to their former ranks)

But as the Army board had concluded at the time, and subsequent de-classified documents confirmed,Washington DC knew the attack was coming, knew exactly where the Japanese fleet was, and knew where it was headed.

On November 29th, Secretary of State Hull showed United Press reporter Joe Leib a message with the time and place of the attack, and the New York Times in its special 12/8/41 Pearl Harbor edition, on page 13, reported that the time and place of the attack had been known in advance!

The much repeated claim that the Japanese fleet maintained radio silence on its way to Hawaii was a lie.

Among other intercepts still held in the Archives of the NSA is the UNCODED message sent by the Japanese tanker Shirya stating, “proceeding to a position 30.00 N, 154.20 E. Expect to arrive at that point on 3 December.” (near HI)

President Lyndon Johnson wanted a war in Vietnam.

He wanted it to help his friends who owned defense companies to do a little business.

He needed it to get the Pentagon and CIA to quit trying to invade Cuba.

And most of all, he needed a provocation to convince the American people that there was really “no other choice”.

On August 5, 1964, newspapers across America reported “renewed attacks” against American destroyers operating in Vietnamese waters, specifically the Gulf of Tonkin.

The official story was that North Vietnamese torpedo boats launched an “unprovoked attack” on the USS Maddox while it was on “routine patrol”.

The truth is that USS Maddox was involved in aggressive intelligence gathering in coordination with actual attacks by South Vietnam and the Laotian Air Force against targets in North Vietnam.

The truth is also that there was no attack by torpedo boats against the USS Maddox.

Captain John J. Herrick, the task force commander in the Gulf, cabled Washington DC that the report was the result of an “over-eager” sonar man who had picked up the sounds of his own ship’s screws and panicked.

But even with this knowledge that the report was false, Lyndon Johnson went on national TV that night to announce the commencement of air strikes against North Vietnam, “retaliation” for an attack that had never occurred.

President George H. W. Bush wanted a war in Iraq.

Like Crassus, George Bush is motivated by money.

Specifically oil money.

But with the OPEC alliance failing to keep limits on oil production in the Mideast, the market was being glutted with oil pumped from underneath Iraq, which sat over roughly 1/3 of the oil reserves of the entire region.



George wanted a war to stop that flow of oil, to keep prices (and profits) from falling any further than they already had.

But like Roosevelt, he needed the “other side” to make the first move.

Iraq had long been trying to acquire greater access to the Persian Gulf, and felt limited confined a narrow strip of land along Kuwait’s northern border, which placed Iraqi interests in close proximity with hostile Iran.

George Bush, who had been covertly arming Iraq during its war with Iran, sent word via April Glaspie that the United States would not intervene if Saddam Hussein grabbed a larger part of Kuwait.

Saddam fell for the bait and invaded.

Of course, Americans were not about to send their sons and daughters to risk their lives for petroleum products.

So George Bush arranged a hoax, using a public relations firm which has grown rich on taxpayer money by being most industrious and creative liars!

The PR firm concocted a monumental fraud in which the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the United States, went on TV pretending to be a nurse, and related a horror story in which Iraqi troops looted the incubators from a Kuwaiti hospital, leaving the premature babies on the cold floor to die.

The media, part of the swindle from the start, never bothered asking why the “nurse” didn’t just pick the babies up and wrap them in blankets or something.

Enraged by the incubator story, Americans supported operation Desert Storm, which never removed Saddam Hussein from power but which did take Kuwait’s oil off of the market for almost 2 years and limited Iraq’s oil exports to this very day.

That our sons and daughters came home with serious and lingering medical illnesses was apparently not too great a price to pay for increased oil profits. 



Following the victory in Iraq, yet another war appeared to be in the offering in the mineral rich regions of Bosnia.

Yet again, a hoax was used to create support for military action.

The photo (right) of Fikret Alic staring through a barbed wire fence, was used to “prove” the existence of modern day “Concentration Camps”.

As the headline of “Belsen 92” indicates, all possible associations with the Nazi horrors were made to sell the necessity of sending yet more American troops into someone else’s nation.



But when German Journalists went to Trnopolje, the site of the supposed Concentration Camp. to film a documentary, they discovered that the photo was a fake!

The camp at Trnopolje was not a concentration camp but a refugee center. Nor was it surrounded by barbed wire.

Careful examination of the original photo revealed that the photographer had shot the photo through a broken section of fence surrounding a tool shed.

It was the photographer who was on the inside, shooting out at the refugees.

Once again, Americans had been hoaxed into support of actions they might otherwise not have agreed with.


While several American Presidents have willingly started wars for personal purposes, perhaps no President has ever carried it to the extreme that Bill Clinton has.

Coincident with the expected public statement of Monica Lewinsky following her testimony, Bill Clinton ordered a cruise missile attack on Sudan and Afghanistan, claiming to have had irrefutable proof that bogeyman extraordinaire (and former Afghani ally) Osama Bin Ladin was creating terrorist chemical weapons there.


Examination of the photos of the debris revealed none of the expected structures one would find in a laboratory that handled lethal weapons-grade materials. 

Assurances from the CIA that they had a positive soil test for biological weapons fell on their face when it was revealed that there had been no open soil anywhere near the pre-bombed facility.

Sudan requested that international observers come test the remains of the factory for any signs of the nerve gas Clinton had insisted was there.

None was found.

The Sudanese plant was a harmless aspirin factory, and the owner has sued for damages.


Later examination of the site hit in Afghanistan revealed it to be a mosque.

Click for larger image


Meanwhile, back in Kosovo, stories about genocide and atrocities were flooding the media (in time to distract from the Sudanese embarrassments), just as lurid and sensational and as it turns out often just as fictional as most of  William Randolph Hearst’s stories of atrocities against the Cubans.

Again, the government and the media were hoaxing Americans. The above photo was shown on all the American networks, claiming to be one of Slobodan Milosovic’s Migs, shot down while attacking civilians.

Closer examination (click on the photo) shows it to be stenciled in English!

Like Germany under Chancellor Hitler, there have been events in our nation which strike fear into the hearts of the citizens, such as the New York World Trade Tower bombing, the OK City Federal Building, and the Olympic Park bomb (nicely timed to divert the media from witnesses to the TWA 800 shoot down).

The media has been very quick to blame such events on “radicals”, “subversives”, “vast right wing conspiracies”, and other “enemies in our midst”, no different than the lies used by Cicero and Hitler.

But on closer examination, such “domestic terrorist” events do not appear to be what they are made out to be.

The FBI had an informant inside the World Trade Tower bombers, Emad Salam, who offered to sabotage the bomb. The FBI told him “no”. 

The so-called “hot bed” of white separatism at Elohim City, occasional home to Tim McVeigh in the weeks prior to the OK City bombing, was founded and run by an FBI informant!

Click for larger image


And nobody has ever really explained what this second Ryder truck was doing in a secret camp half way from Elohim City to Oklahoma City two weeks before the bombing.

So, here we are today. Like the Romans of Crassus’ and Cicero’s time, or the Germans under a newly elected Hitler, we are being warned that a dangerous enemy threatens us, implacable, invisible, omnipresent, and invulnerable as long as our government is hamstrung by that silly old Bill of Rights.

Already there have appeared articles debating whether or not “extraordinary measures” (i.e. torture) are not fully justified under certain circumstances such as those we are purported to face.

As was the case in Rome and Germany, the government continues to plead with the public for an expansion of its power and authority, to “deal with the crisis”.

However, as Casio watch timers are paraded before the cameras, to the stentorian tones of the talking heads’ constant dire warnings, it is legitimate to question just how real the crises is, and how much is the result of political machinations by our own leaders.

Are the terrorists really a threat, or just patsies with fake bombs and Casio watches, paid for by Cicero and given brown shirts to wear by Hitler?

Is terrorism inside the United States really from outside, or is it a stage managed production, designed to cause Americans to believe they have no choice but to surrender the Republic and accept the totalitarian rule of a new emperor, or a new Fuhrer?

Indeed, given that acts of terror undermine the very public support needed by the so-called “terrorists” to bring about change, it may be argued that there are in fact no genuine acts of terror; that they are all manufactured events to be blamed on the groups wishing to challenge the status quo.

Once lost, the Romans never got their Republic back. Once lost, the Germans never got their Republic back.

In both cases, the nation had to totally collapse before freedom was restored to the people.

Remember that when Crassus tells you that Spartacus approaches.

Remember that when thugs in the streets act in a manner clearly designed to provoke the public fear.

Remember that when the Reichstag burns down.

Remember that when the President lies to you about weapons of mass destruction.

See also: The 9/11 Reichstag Fire





Ron Paul takes Republican Party of Minnesota by storm


From the Trenches

 May 22, 2012 by Admin

A victory for Ron Paul in Minnesota.

The Texas congressman managed to sweep up 12 of the 13 delegates at the Republican Party Convention.

Many have doubted Paul would come close to getting the GOP nomination, but only he and Mitt Romney are left standing.

So can Ron Paul keep up his momentum?

Austin Petersen, director of production for Freedom Works, joins us with more on Paul’s latest victory.





Voter Fraud, Corruption, and Assault Against Paul Supporters at Arizona Convention

( Original Title : Alleged Voter Fraud, Corruption, and Assault Against Ron Paul Supporters at Arizona GOP Convention )

From The Intel Hub

By Al Dicicco
May 22, 2012

Editors Note: Below is a first hand report from the Arizona GOP convention.

On May 12, 2012, after being elected as an alternate delegate in Mohave County Arizona, I attended the GOP Convention in Phoenix Arizona.

The GOP laid out no clear rules  as to how the day would.

The so-called GOP leadership was blatantly focused around their preselected candidate Mitt Romney and not on making the process fair and understandable to newcomers.

There was an asterisk endorsing Romney supporters on the actual ballot which threw off the entire voting.

I spent 24 hours awake on this trip due to their gross incompetence. It was craziness.

The security was hostile. They welcomed us by forcing us to remove hundreds of Ron Paul signs.

Security called the deputies to be sure all Ron Paul signs were out of the building.

That’s right, what i saw was the violation of freedom of speech, oppression suppression, and coercion by the GOP, all in the name of supporting the establishment candidate, Mitt Romney.

The GOP clearly lacks leadership and has lost the true nature of a Conservative is with their outright contempt for the U.S.

Constitution, Bill of Rights, and our basic freedoms and liberties which our forefathers fought for and people die for.

The censorship makes me physically ill as I write. I feel like I am living in a fascist nation.

They’ll be a lot more press coming out on this convention and I am sure there will be many videos and legal actions challenging the votes due to the blatant incompetence and suspected corruption that was rampant throughout the convention.

The GOP is force feeding the masses Romney on a platter with no choice.

Ron Paul supporters may shout at times, but Romney supporters are like the blind leading the blind.

This country is in great peril.

My 10 minutes aren’t up! RON PAUL

I, Al DiCicco and Elected Delegate for Mohave County was assaulted and denied my free speech by “security” at the GOP in Arizona.


Ron Paul delegates forced to remove all signs:






Obama Supported UN Law of the Sea Treaty Goes to Senate For Final Vote



From Occupy Corporatism

By Susanne Posel-Occupy Corporatism

May 18, 2012

The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) places the UN in control over 70% of the earth’s surface and resources. LOST will move the global Elite miles ahead toward their goal of global governance.

LOST encompasses “all ocean space, with all its uses, including navigation and overflight; all uses of its resources, living and non-living, on the high seas, on the ocean floor and beneath, on the continental shelf and in the territorial seas…. The Convention is widely recognized by the international community as the legal framework within which all activities in the oceans and the seas must be carried out.”

LOST will utilize technology and wealth transfers and requires all nations signed to the treaty to adopt its regulations and laws. The UN will have the final authority over all nations through LOST.

The UN held its first Conference on the Law of the Sea in 1956; where ideals were discussed.

In 1960, the second conference did not produce any agreements.

The third conference (from 1973 to 1982) yielded the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, or LOST.

In 1982, former President Ronald Regan fought against it.

Regan was opposed to Part XI’s provisions; stating that an International Seabed authority (ISA) would be created to command sea exploration for mining purposes.

ISA would mine, collect and redistribute royalties from the resources taken.

Former President Bill Clinton endorsed it and attempted to have the US congress ratify it.

As of recent times, 157 nations have signed onto LOST. The European Union prides itself on being part of the treaty.

The US has not ratified the treaty, although Obama is supporting its provisions and through executive orders, is implementing its ideals.

LOST would give the UN authority over everything above and below the seas and oceans of the world.

Under LOST, there will not be an ability to veto as with the UN Security Council.

The 62nd UN General Assembly Plenary meeting recorded this statement with regard to LOST: “The Assembly had before it a 22-part resolution on oceans and the Convention on the Law of the Sea … by which it would call on States to harmonize, as a matter of priority, national legislation with the provisions of the Convention and, where applicable, relevant agreements and provisions…. The Assembly then adopted the resolution by a recorded vote of 146 in favour to 2 against . . .”

This call to harmonize all nations for the sake of LOST is a direct move toward unilateral governance by international mandate.

LOST has the unwavering support of President Obama, Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, and Chairman of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, John Kerry.

The Obama administration would like to see LOST’s provisions made priority within foreign policy initiatives under the guise of more intimate cooperation from other nations.

At a hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in January of 2012, Hilary Clinton remarked that the ratification of LOST is a priority for her “because it is long overdue”.

Senator John Kerry asserted at the same hearing that “we are now laying the groundwork for and expect to try to take up the Law of the Sea Treaty. So that will be one of the priorities of — of the committee, and the key here is just timing, how we proceed”.

HR 3534, called Consolidated Land, Energy, and Aquatic Resources Act of 2010 (CLEAR), is being paired with a bill that has no identifying tracking numbers as of yet.

These two bills combined create global taxation. In Section 802, a conservation tax of $2 per barrel of oil and .20 cents per BTUs of natural gas is implemented.

This will raise costs of off-shore drilling, which most oil corporations were forced to become under legislative requirements.

CLEAR is the precursor to LOST because it gives the UN all rights to American oceans and splits the United States of America into 9 sectors geographically; as well as places cap and trade climate change restrictions.

In Section 106 of the bill to ratify LOST is the power to engage the executive branch of our US government to apply LOST through executive orders, regulations, directives and/or delegations of authority.

This proceeds even CLEAR.

Obama signed his executive order Stewardship of the Oceans, Our Coasts and the Great Lakes Executive Order and the Interim Report of the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force (IOPTF).

The purpose of IOPTF is to adhere to LOST.

The report will provide the framework for planning and conservation, economic endeavors, user adherence and sustainable use; as well as social justice, as dictated by LOST and the UN.

An estimated $900 million will be used for the implementation of a global approach to our land, oceans, coastal areas and Great Lakes.

The US Senate is expected to vote on LOST next month. More committee meetings and hearings may occur prior to the vote.

It is expected that the Obama administration will push hard for the treaty to be ratified as soon as possible.





Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~ Xaniel777



One Response to “REAL NEWS May 24, 2012”

  1. nctweb.com said

    I’ve been surfing online greater than three hours these days, yet I never found any fascinating article like yours. It is lovely value sufficient for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content material as you probably did, the net can be much more helpful than ever before.


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: