DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

REAL NEWS June 29, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 28, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : June 29, 2012

===========================================================================

Here’s a statement I found at Mike Rivero’s ‘ What Really Happened.com ‘, that Americans should read and remember who we are :

“Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom.

Congress have no power to disarm the militia.

Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…

[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments,

but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” –

– Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.

=========================================================================================

 

Rubio: IRS to ‘come after’ uninsured Americans

{ XANIEL’S NOTE : This is just what Romney needed to take the election away from Obama.

We are enough trouble with this current President, but if , ‘ Romney gets elected, GOD HELP US ALL !!’

What really surprises me, is Obama actully thinks he did something great and won something here.

Instead he has pushed this Country closer to ‘ The Second American Relvoution. ‘

The First Black President in the History of the United States, will no doubt be the last President of the United States!

From this point on, you can except the States ( over short time of each other) to start Seceding from the rest of the Nation.

My best guess is, that this once great Nation will split itself into 5 (five) to 7 (seven) New Republics,

with NO U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT attached to any of them.

‘ Rest in Peace U.S.A. ‘ 

Let’s all thank ‘ Barry ‘ people!

May History spit upon you Barry ( the Obama ) Soetoro }~~Xaniel777

========================================================================

From POLITICO

By MJ LEE | 6/28/12

Sen. Marco Rubio said Thursday that the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold President Barack Obama’s health care law means that the IRS will now “come after” Americans.

“I hope people back home fully understand what this means, and here’s what this means: It is now unlawful for you not to buy health insurance, and if you do not buy it, you have an IRS problem,” the Florida Republican said on Fox News.

“If you do not buy health insurance, the IRS is going to be on your back and chasing you. They’re going to take away your refund, they’re going to increase your fees, they’re going to come after you.”

Rubio argued that millions of Americans will face being “out of compliance” with the IRS for not having health insurance coverage.

“Somehow the Obama administration thinks that’s a victory,” he said. “That’s everything you need to know about that administration.”

The high court ruled Thursday that Congress did not overstep its power by requiring almost all Americans to buy health insurance.

The justices ruled that Congress has the authority to impose the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate through its taxing power.

In his interview on Fox News, Rubio said he wants Democrats and Republicans to agree on a need to “start from scratch.”

“I hope that even the Democrats in the Senate will realize — I hope this is not what they intended, and will repeal this thing and let’s start from scratch, replacing it with some common sense approaches that somehow doesn’t put all of these millions of Americans at odds and at war with the IRS,” he said.

(See also: Full coverage of the health care reform decision)

Rubio, a first-term senator who won his seat in 2010, said the high court’s decision has put the politics surrounding health care “back where we were when I ran for office.”

“One of the central issues of the campaign was this real anger at the overreach of the Obama administration on this health care law,” he said. “I think this now becomes a central issue again.”

He added, “This is one more piece of evidence that the Obama administration is hurting economic growth in America.”

Rubio appeared on CNN shortly after and repeated that the decision could give Americans “an IRS problem.”

“It is a loss for America. Let me begin by reminding everybody what the Supreme Court decides is they decide whether something is a constitutional or not constitutional. They don’t decide whether this is a good idea. And it’s specific, and when they found that it was constitutional what they said was the reason why it’s constitutional is because it is a tax increase. Millions of Americans may now have an IRS problem as a result of the ruling,” he told CNN’s Candy Crowley.

“This is now turning the IRS into an enforcement mechanism for Obamacare,” he added.

Rubio also said he was not concerned about the political ramifications of the court’s decision for Mitt Romney.

“Let me first mention that when Governor Romney was the governor of a state, that is the state policy. If you don’t like the policies of the state, you can easily go to another state, and the state, by the way, does not have the IRS,” he said.

(Also on POLITICO: Kennedy slams ‘vast judicial overreaching’)

END

 

 

 

 

 Cantor: House will vote on repeal on health care law on July 11

 

From POLITICO

 By SEUNG MIN KIM | 6/28/12

LINK TO VIDEO HERE 

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said Thursday that the Republican-led House will vote on repealing the health care law soon after the July 4 recess.

Cantor, who sets the floor schedule in the House, said in a statement that the House will vote on the repeal the week of July 9 – which Cantor said will clear the path for “patient-centered reforms that lower costs and increase choice.”

(PHOTOS: 21 landmark SCOTUS rulings)

“The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold ObamaCare is a crushing blow to patients throughout the country,” Cantor said. “ObamaCare has failed to keep the President’s basic promise of allowing those who like their health care to keep it, while increasing costs and reducing access to quality care for patients.”

UPDATE: Cantor said in a follow-up Tweet that the vote will be July 11.

 END

 

 

 

 

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY – Dr Robert Gallo

 

Uploaded by  on Dec 2, 2011

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY – Dr Robert Gallo

Courtesy: Dr Leonard Horovitz [in the interests of extending Human Educational knowledge].

AIDS was deliberately created to deliberately depopulation development of humanity – created at Fort Dietrick through US Bioweapons development.

END

 

 

 

 

US Supreme Court Rules against We the People

 

From the Trenches

Posted on June 27, 2012 by Henry Shivley


One of the consolations being offered to the Ron Paul supporters by the Campaign for Liberty is the assertion that, though we may not succeed in getting the GOP ticket for Dr. Paul, we will make “great inroads” in electing patriotic local representatives, who in accordance with the theory, will pass local legislation designed to protect our Constitution and our rights.

On Monday, the so called Supreme Court of the United States destroyed all illusions of correcting the problems within our nation from the bottom up, as key portions of Arizona’s immigration law was struck down by the treasonous insurgent soviet socialists sitting on the Supreme Court.

The one provision that was upheld is effectively nullified simply through Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s refusal to enforce our federal immigration laws. 

The fact is the manner in which the treasonous court ruled will only encourage further invasion from the south.

Though the police in Arizona can, via reasonable suspicion, check the legal status of anyone they pull over for another offence, it is being reported that ICE will simply delay the transfer of information at the traffic stop to the point that the illegals will have to be let go.

Even if they are arrested they must be turned over to ICE who will let them go. 

 And if they are not let go, of course with the aid of the treasonous bastards that are supposed to be bringing them to justice, they will be, not only allowed, but encouraged, to sue the state for violation of their rights, making it absolutely clear that the perceived right of foreign nationals in our country illegally not to be detained outweighs the US nationals right to have a free and sovereign country and a constitutional Republic of, for, and by we the people.

This latest outrage is just another among a tidal wave of injustices being heaped upon us and any assertion that we the people can regain control of our country through anything short of a full blown revolution is a fantasy. 

We the people need to stop grasping for straws as we are being put to our knees. 

We need to stand up and assert our lawful authority to remove the treasonous insurgents within our government.

The only question left is how bad we are going to allow this thing to get before we act.

God bless the Republic, death to the international corporate mafia, we shall prevail.

END

 

 

 

 

Celente Launches 2nd American Revolution:

 Puts His Money Where His Heart Is

From LewRockwell

Trends Journal

June 26, 2012

KINGSTON, NY, 26 June 2012 – Gerald Celente’s forecast is clear – The 2nd American Revolution is on the horizon.

And this American Patriot has done more than just sign up to join the fight, he’s established its headquarters.

Inspired by its potent symbolic value, Celente has purchased the 1750s ,Franz Roggen House  a stately stone colonial set on the northeast corner of John and Crown Streets, in Kingston’s historic Stockade District.

This is the only intersection in the United States that boasts pre-revolutionary stone buildings on all four corners.

“Kingston played a critical role in the 1st American Revolution and was, for a short while, the capitol of New York State,” observes Celente. “Here is where I’m taking my stand to start the 2nd American Revolution.”

“The 1st American Revolution was fought with armies and bullets,” says Celente. “The 2nd American Revolution will not cost lives and limbs; it will be fought with mind and spirit.”

Celente is unequivocal: “America’s democratic political system is degenerate, corrupt and ineffective. It cannot be patched up or papered over.

Rather, it must be renewed, revived, and reconfigured from the ground up,” he says. “The potential for positive and sweeping change is there. It can happen, but it has to be made to happen.”

How? First, “We the people” must be made aware of the urgent need for real change.

Then “we” must learn to accept and embrace the concept of a full-scale intellectual revolution.

“The time is ripe, Americans are ‘mad as hell and not going to take it anymore,’” says Celente, who predicts that the November election will be the turning point. “The polls prove it. There is little enthusiasm for either candidate and, once again, Americans will be left with no choice other than the choice of the lesser of two evils.”

“Stay Home, Don’t Vote!”

Celente’s Revolutionary call to arms begins with a voter’s strike. “Stay Home, Don’t Vote” is his campaign slogan. “People have been conned into believing that if you don’t vote you’ve lost the right to complain. That’s political baloney,” fumes Celente. “The true case is exactly the opposite.

This is a two-headed, one party system. Republican or Democrat, considering their track records, it’s clear nothing can be expected from either Presidential candidate other than the perpetuation of the destructive and criminal policies that have brought America to its current state of perpetual crisis and socioeconomic decline. Ditto for Congress.”

“What self-respecting person would cast a vote for a lesser of two evils?” asks Celente. “Not only is it immoral and undignified, it’s destructive. Lesser or greater, evil is evil.

By supporting one evil or the other, the voter becomes an accessory to the crime. Only a true intellectual revolution can restore dignity, trust, morality, decency and compassion.”

“Anything else is just more of the same. Stay Home, Don’t Vote!”

As far as Celente is concerned, “We can change course, restore our country and regain our independence. United, the American people have the power to prevail and create a more ‘perfect Union.’”

======================================

Copyright © 2012 Gerald Celente

Gerald Celente is founder and director of The Trends Research Institute, author of  Trends 2000 and  Trend Tracking (Warner Books), and publisher of The Trends Journal. He has been forecasting trends since 1980, and recently called “The Collapse of ’09.”


END

 

 

 

 

10 Disturbing SHTF Threats that most Preppers Haven’t Prepared For

 

Off Grid Survival

From OFF GRID SURVIVAL

June 22, 2012

When planning for a SHTF scenario, there’s really only one thing that we can be sure of;  Survival will be a bigger challenge than you ever believed possible.

While you can defiantly take measures to prepare yourself for what’s to come, when you’re talking about a SHTF scenario, all bets are really off.

Here are 10 things that you may have never considered when planning for a SHTF survival situation.

Law Enforcement Issues

1. No Law Enforcement

military troops

During an extreme SHTF scenario, it is very likely that law enforcement and emergency responders will be nonexistent.

Even during small scale disasters, law enforcement officers often leave to take care of their own families first.

When things go bad (empty grocery stores, no utilities, mass riots, violence, etc.) you are more than likely going to have to defend yourself.

2. Fake Law Enforcement

In a SHTF Scenario you need to be on the lookout for everything including people impersonating law enforcement and military personnel.

During a catastrophic event, you will most likely see criminals preying on the innocent by pretending to be either police or military officers.

You have to be able to quickly determine who is who, or stay away from people at all costs.

3. Law Enforcement and the Military Will Try to Take Your Guns.

Think it can’t happen? It already has!

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans Police Superintendent Eddie Compass ordered all local law enforcement, including the U.S. Marshalls office and the National Guard, to seize all civilian firearms.

Without warrants, armed National Guard troops and New Orleans law enforcement officials forcibly confiscated over 1,000 legal firearms from law abiding citizens.

The New Orleans gun confiscation should serve as a warning to how the government and law enforcement officials will react during a large scale national disaster.

 It is extremely likely that they will come for your guns!

Personal Safety Issues

4. Gangs & Raiders

Prepper Image

If things go bad, there will likely be more people who mean to do you harm than there will be people who are prepared.

This is something that you must accept and learn to deal with. 

The fact is, most people have no idea what it really takes to survive and once their safety net is removed they will become increasingly desperate and unpredictable.

Let’s face it, even during the good times there’s a certain segment of our population that’s just downright insane.

From the idiots who go nuts and riot after their team loses a game, to the violent criminals and gangs who are already terrorizing big cities throughout America, there’s little doubt that a total collapse would make urban living almost impossible.

5. You need to be able to Defend Yourself.

During an extreme emergency situation the lunatics of the world are going to be roaming the streets looking for easy victims to target. 

If you’re serious about survival, you need to train yourself in multiple self-defense styles and techniques.

This means arming yourself with not only weapons, but also with the knowledge of how to defend yourself without them.

Sanitation Issues

Sanitation

6. Garbage will become a Killer.

This is a topic that’s not often discussed, but it’s one that will probably become a real problem during a SHTF situation.

Often, people who talk about urban survival worry about things like raiders and roaming gangs, but the real danger might actually come from something that you already have in your home  –Garbage

7. You have to Stock up on Sanitation Items

When planning to survive in any long-term survival situation, one thing that’s often overlooked is the dangers associated with a lack of adequate sanitation.

I know it’s not a pleasant thing to think about, but this one issue has the potential to kill more people than any other survival topic that we can talk about.

Mental & Physical Health Issues

8. Maintaining a Positive Mental Attitude during a Survival Situation

The ability to maintain a positive mental attitude during a survival situation is something that needs to be taking seriously.

It’s also something that you need to start working on now, before the SHTF.

Making it through a survival scenario often comes down to how well you can control your emotions.

Keeping a positive frame of mind, even in the face of an unthinkable threat, will help you process what’s happening and will help you respond to the situation without giving into fear.

9. You must be prepared to face a number of physical and mental challenges.

From dealing with a lack of sleep and inadequate hydration, to coping with hunger pains and other stressors, survival can take a huge toll on your body.

One of the best things you can do to ensure your survival, in just about any situation, is to make sure your body and your mind are trained to survive. This means motivating yourself to get off your butt and get in shape now, before it’s to late.

Communication Issues

10. You will be cut off from the outside World.

Teotwawki

In a survival situation, knowledge is going to be a critical factor in determining the ultimate outcome of your situation.

The ability to be able to predict what will happen in a survival situation is an important part of being prepared and often comes down to your ability to send and receive information.

When the power lines go down and the radio stations stop transmitting, there’s one line of communication that will still be alive and well.

 Having a good Multiband Ham Radio will allow you to send and receive critical emergency information during a disaster.

It’s also a great way to find alternative news sources from around the world.

END

 

 

 

 

1961 – A Jewish Defector Warns America!!!

 

From the Trenches

Posted on June 27, 2012 by David2


The Vatic Project  Vatic Note:  I cannot believe the hidden history that I am falling onto by accident.

 This is another major big eye opener.  

I want to thank the pragmatic Witness for finding this and publishing it.  

This is what happens when you  go down rabbit holes looking for something else…. and history jumps up and kicks you in the toosh.  

This great Jewish man, through an attack of conscience and his love for his adopted country, The United States of America,  came clean in 1961 in a spontaneous speech he gave  and its revealing.

What courage and integrity he had.  Something that has been disappearing here,  like real clouds.

He literally tells us these so called “Jews” are really Khazars but he uses the term Jews because that is what every one else calls them.  

Now this is in 1961.  Unbelievable.

If I had tried to post this  10 years ago, no one would have listened, but today its our new reality.  

He warned us and told us clearly what, how and how long this had been going on.  

We did not listened, and I probably would have been banned like I was for saying Goldman sachs was the culprit we needed to focus on, and that is why we started the blog, to stop the censorship and banning we were getting.

 Anyway, read this eye opening speech.  

It is a necessary knowledge that we need to deal with oursituation and how to overcome it.  

We are clearly running out of time.  

Soldiers patrolling American city streets in Missouri.

A Jewish Defector Warns America

 by Pragmatic Witness,  

 A Speech given By Benjamin H. Freedman in 1961 

Publishers (Prag Witness) Introductory Note: Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. 

He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. 

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation.

Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. 

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.

Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman’s essential message to us — his warning to the West — is more urgent than ever before. — K.A.S.

FREEDMAN’S SPEECH :

HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. (VN:  Because this was given back in 1961, it was not known yet or not shown the satanism that was prevalent within the khazar Zionists agenda and behind the scenes as we saw with the ancient bloodlines that we covered on here this past 2 weeks.

 So keep that in mind when you read about “Co-religionists, since they are not religious as we know it.)

For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country.

Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914.

There are few people here my age who remember that.

Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually.

The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean.

Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week’s food supply — and after that, starvation.

At that time, the French army had mutinied.

They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme.

The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn’t want to play war anymore, they didn’t like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany.

And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms.

They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis.

That means: “Let’s call the war off, and let room.

There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war.

We were railroaded into — if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into — that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine.

That is something that the people of the United States have never been told.

They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let’s have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.”

They didn’t know whether the war would last another year or another ten years.

So they started to work out a receipt.

The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn’t know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain’s promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war.

So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill.

I don’t think I could make it more emphatic than that. (VN: Britain needed the US to come into the war because they were losing it.  But the bankers, Rothschild, was winning once the US came into the war.)

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany.

You know what happened.

When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. 

I was there: I ought to know.

Now what happened?

The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, “How about Palestine for us?”

And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration.

So the Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh, so that was the game!
That’s why the United States came into the war.”

The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

 (VN: That was the first time they found out that it was all a conspiracy to stop Germany’s economic growth, that both Britain and the US, wanted to stop, especially Britain and the Zionists wanted their Palestine and we published how Rothschild had spent 220,000 dollars in those days for Palestinian land.

 Then not too long ago we published another blog about the same situation arising after Hitler came into power and Germany was growing economically, which the British seemed to hate.  

Churchill quotes were included in the blog confirming their desire to put Germany down again for the same reason)

That brings us to another very interesting point.

When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it.

Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany.

You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry andfinance as is Bernard Baruch in this country.

You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd’s and the Hamburg-American Lines.

You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family.

You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers — the biggest in the world.

The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that.

The Germans felt: “Well, that was quite a sellout.”

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union.

And we were winning.

And we told the Soviet Union: “Well, let’s quit. We offer you peace terms. Let’s forget the whole thing.”

And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union.

And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat.

A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man’s imagination cannot encompass.

Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us.

How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese?

I don’t think that one of them would dare show his face on any street.

There wouldn’t be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that’s how the Germans felt towards these Jews.

They’d been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany.

And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely.

And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers —

and the press was filled with their statements —

that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war.

The Jews themselves admitted that.

It wasn’t that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer.

There was no religious feeling.

There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief.

It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious.

Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said “Shema’ Yisroel” or “Our Father.”

Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States.

Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible.

They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy.

They built up world trade.

You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth.

Three hundred separate little political entities.

And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state.

And within 50 years they became one of the world’s great powers.

Their navy was rivalling Great Britain’s, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products.

What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany.

There isn’t one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it.

But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed.

Not a single hair.

Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.

They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists.

Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time.

And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days.  

Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days.

In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar.

So he fled to Holland for safety, for security.

After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone’s head.

They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor.

They didn’t fight one another with pistols.

Well, that’s the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany.

And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews.

About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews.

And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact.

They didn’t want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

 The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews.

They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could.

They shunned them.

The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam.

Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933.

And they said to Germany: “You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can’t treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you.”

You can imagine what the Germans told them.

So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said,

“The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business.”

And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany’s food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported.

So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany’s population would have to starve.

There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population.

Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that “this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration,”

which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time.

Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn’t find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words “made in Germany” on it.

In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked “made in Germany,”

they were picketed with signs saying “Hitler,” “murderer,” and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.

At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked “made in Germany.”

Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I’ve been observing women’s legs for many years and it’s been a long time since I’ve seen any cotton stockings on them.

I saw Macy’s boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying “murderers,” “Hitlerites,” and so forth.

Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany.

There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, “Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?” They naturally resented it.

Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews.

Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be?

Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn’t until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany.

And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don’t like to use the word “anti-Semitism” because it’s meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I’ll have to use it.

The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott.

Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive.

In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between.

And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible.

And they started to re-arm.

In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union.

The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that “Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong.”

The same as we in this country are saying today, “Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong.”

Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense.

Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination.

I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT.

Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed.

Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now?

If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished.

Why might such a war take place? 

It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. 

The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government.

That is just as true as I am standing here.

Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son’s.

Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don’t know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe.

Did you know it at that time?

Not a person in the United States knew it.

You weren’t permitted to know it.

Who knew it?

President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it?

I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there.

I was “confidential man” to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer.

So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson’s brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.

Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand.

President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby.

That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept.

They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered.

For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their “commonwealth.”

They’ve fooled you so much that you don’t know whether you’re coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, “Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony.”

I don’t know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury.

If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don’t call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.)

The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world’s population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars.

They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia.

And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe.

They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries.

The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe — so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers.

That’s how big and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now.

But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world.

The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith — either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism.

By spinning a top, and calling out “eeny, meeny, miney, moe,” he picked out so-called Judaism.

And that became the state religion.

He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews.

There wasn’t one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land.  

(VN:  actually as we proved on here through subsequent research, that they picked Judaism because they were forced to choose by the west and by the east who were invading them for their lack of moral ethics in business, funny how somethings never change. Remember they controlled the silk road between east and west) 

Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time.

Not one of them!

And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, “You want to help repatriate God’s Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don’t you?

It’s your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior.

You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we’re Jews.”

But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted.

It is as ridiculous to call them “people of the Holy Land,” as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems “Arabs.”

Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief.

Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed’s birthplace.

Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves “Arabs.”

You would say they were lunatics.

Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy.

All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia.

The same as the Irish.

When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants.

They hadn’t become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe.

Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter.

Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain.

So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. 

Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, “We’re going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God’s Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land.”

Could there be a bigger lie than that?

Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie.

You’d believe black is white if you heard it often enough.

You wouldn’t call black black anymore — you’d start to call black white.

And nobody could blame you.

That is one of the great lies of history.

It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.

 Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them?

I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I’m not here to be a rabble-rouser. I’m here to give you facts.

When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite.

It is the only prayer for which you stand.

You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre.

In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void.

The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge.

They shall have no force or effect.

And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them.

How much can you depend on their loyalty?

You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.

 We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.

 

END

 

 

 

 

UK ready to take on Israel over fate of children clapped in irons

 

The Independent

From The Independent 

By Terri Judd – June 27, 2012

The Foreign Office revealed last night that it would be challenging the Israelis over their treatment of Palestinian children after a report by a delegation of senior British lawyers revealed unconscionable practices, such as hooding and the use of leg irons.

In the first investigation of its kind, a team of nine senior legal figures examined how Palestinians as young as 12 were treated when arrested.

Their shocking report Children in Military Custody details claims that youngsters are dragged from their beds in the middle of the night, have their wrists bound behind their backs, and are blindfolded and made to kneel or lie face down in military vehicles.

Children from the West Bank are held in conditions that could amount to torture, such as solitary confinement, with little or no access to their parents.

They can be forced to stay awake before being verbally as well as physically abused and coerced into signing confessions they cannot read.

The team – led by Sir Stephen Sedley, a former Court of Appeal judge – heard that “every Palestinian child is treated like a potential terrorist”.

In a damning conclusion, the report points out repeated breaches of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which prohibits cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

“We were sitting in court and saw a section of a preliminary hearing when a very young looking child, a boy, was brought in wearing a brown uniform with leg irons on. We were shocked by that. This was a situation where we had been invited into the military courts for briefings from senior judges,” explained one of the report’s authors, human rights barrister Greg Davies.

“To hold children routinely and for substantial periods in solitary confinement would, if it occurred, be capable of amounting to torture,” the report said.

Last night the Foreign Office, which backed the report, said it would be taking up the claims with the Israeli authorities:

“The UK government has had long-standing concerns about the treatment of Palestinian children in Israeli detention, and as a result decided to fund this independent report. While recognising that some positive recent steps have been made by the Israeli authorities, we share many of the report’s concerns, and will continue to lobby for further improvements.”

While the legal team said it was in no position to prove the truth of the claims of cruelty made repeatedly by Palestinian children, but denied by the Israeli authorities – which offered unprecedented access to the delegation – it pointed to the disparity in the law.

Israeli children must have access to a lawyer within 48 hours and cannot be imprisoned under the age of 14. But Palestinian children as young as 12 are jailed and can be kept for three months without legal representation.

Between 500 and 700 are jailed each year.

“The other shocking thing is they are incarcerated in breach of many conventions.

The practical effect is parents can’t get there because they can’t get permits,” said Marianna Hildyard QC.

While the investigating team welcomed improvements introduced by the Israeli authorities, both Palestinian and Israeli lawyers on the ground insisted much of it was “rhetoric ra ther than real change”.

Last night, Israeli Embassy spokesperson Amir Ofek said the country appreciated the efforts of the delegation but blamed Palestinians who “glorify terrorism”.

He said: “As a result [children] are frequently involved in lethal acts.

With the Palestinian Authority unable or unwilling to meet its obligation to investigate and prosecute these offences, Israel has no choice but to do so itself.

“Israel notes the detailed recommendations in the report and will study them closely as part of its ongoing efforts to find the most appropriate balance between preventing violence and treating perpetrators with humanity.”

The report details claims children are dragged from their beds, bound and blindfolded.

www.childreninmilitarycustody.org

To read the report click here

 ========================================================================

END

 

 

 

 

Another attack on the Second Amendment: UN Small Arms Treaty

 

From The PPJ Gazette

June 25, 2012 by ppjg

By Marti Oakley   

The United Nations, that bastion of self-enriching, bloated gas bags, will soon be holding a month long convention on the UN Small Arms TREATY between 192 nations.

Of course, Hillary Clinton is right in the middle of things in an effort to commit the US to this unconstitutional treaty.

Because this is a treaty, and not one of those federal corporate contract agreements the presidents are so fond of, it will have to be brought to the states for ratification (See U.S. Const. art. II, § . Section 3 provides the power to make treaties (with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate)) except I don’t believe that will ever happen. 

Some, never heard of before, political slight of hand will be given as the reason as to why ratification of the treaty by the states was by-passed.

Clinton will agree to the treaty on behalf of the US and Obama will sign it with great pleasure. 

For decades it has been the intent of the federal government to disarm lawful gun owners in the US.

Every possible excuse and reason has been used to try and sell the idea of striking down the 2nd Amendment by both partys. 

The actual intent is, by U.N. mandate to disarm private individual gun owners in America claiming a global treaty banning the ownership of small arms. 

Its all for world peace! 

It will make the military assaults on all nations far easier if the general population isn’t armed and able to mount even a limited defense.

Don’t look to the District of Criminals for help!

If you think other than a few Republicans and even fewer Democrats will half-heartedly object or stand to defend our constitution or our inalienable rights of any kind, much less the right to keep and bear arms, you are sadly mistaken. 

Both party’s have been equally active in their assaults on the constitution, with members of both partys actively promoting the militarization of local law enforcement against their respective communities. 

Our police and many sheriffs departments are now para-military organizations capable and willing to turn on their own communities in subservience to Homeland Security edicts and orders. 

Regarding this, the District of Criminals couldn’t be happier.

See: govtslaves.info

“This is the Treaty that will infringe on the US Constitution, the Second Amendment, and your right to self defense.

The United Nations and specially invited anti firearms rights groups who want to eliminate our firearms freedoms will be convening at the UN July 2nd through the 27th to draft a Treaty to accomplish the goal of regulating firearms and accessories, and ultimately the disarming all of America.”

Spain agreed with the drafters of the Treaty, with input from various international and US gun control groups, who want the “Urgent and essential” Treaty to;

“a) Include a golden rule that prohibits the authorization of arms transfers where there is a substantial risk that used to commit or facilitate the commission-¬ – serious violations of international human rights and international humanitarian law.

b) Allow a comprehensive coverage that includes controls on weapons, ammunition and related material and on ALL (emphasis added) transfers.

c) explicit regulation of solid systems of licensing, transparency and reporting.”

_______________________

We wouldn’t sell arms to the same countries we are fighting…would we?

Supposedly, this treaty will involve only the sale of small arms and military weapons to other countries. 

That’s never going to happen because the US has been selling arms to mid-eastern countrys for years on end, even as we waged wars on them.

What’s The Impact Of U.S. Arms Deals In The Middle East? (NPR Interveiw between Melissa Block and her guest William Hartung)

For the last three years we have sold military weapons valued at about $350 million to Bahrain with no questions asked, including helicopters, guns and ammunition.

The recent uprising in Egypt was accompanied by the use of teargas, the canisters stamped U.S.A.

Host Melissa Block speaks with arms export expert William Hartung.

He’s the director of the Arms and Security Initiative at the New America Foundation. 

From that interview:

Mr. HARTUNG: Well, I think on the low-end, the teargas probably caused the most uproar.

But over the years, a billion dollars or more every year, we were selling tanks, we were selling fighter planes, we were selling armored personnel carriers, things that were used sort of indirectly to close off the square, to buzz the demonstrators.

So, you know, not to the same degree of impact as the teargas, but certainly I think causing some ill feelings towards the United States for supporting the regime for so many years.

This interview only touched on a small number of ongoing arms deals which the US has engaged in for more than 30 years.

WE are the enemy our government fears

In preparation for the disarming of America, our law enforcement agencies now refer to the general public as [civilians]. 

That is a referenced military term. 

These same agencies now carry fully automatic rifles, and in some instance grenades. 

Cities are buying military tanks with ADS systems installed on them and many are buying drones to spy on their populations; drones which will be fully capable of being armed. 

Who is it they are preparing to wage war on?

And guess who it is that will show up at your door in full battle rattle to demand your guns? 

The UN?  Not hardly! 

Those who show up at your door (and they will show up) will be dressed in military gear meant for war.

  Since they will not be in Iraq or Afghanistan or any other country we are aggressively terrorizing……who is it they are preparing to wage war on

It appears this will be war on American soil with what used to be [American’s] dressed for war against the remaining American public. 

We are the enemy our government fears and we currently have the means to fight back against assaults by our own government.

There is not one of us who possesses the fire power or weaponry equivalent to what our own government is prepared to use against us to force us into submission. 

Still, this will not stop a great number of Americans from fighting back.

While this unconstitutional treaty is sold to the public, they will speak great volumes about how disarming everyone (except police, the military, special agents, special ops, FBI, CIA, NSA, and every other corporate federal agency) will help bring [peace] to the world, I don’t believe it will be quite that easy.

Peace will be the last thing the criminal gang on CRAPitol Hill will achieve here at home if they do not stand up to this assault on the 2nd Amendment.

END

 

 

 

 

Former Merck scientists file suit against Merck under False Claims Act

 

From NaturalNews

June 26, 2012 by: Rosemary Mathis, Vice President of Victim Support, SANE VAX, INC.

Merck

(NaturalNews) On April 27, 2012, a formal complaint was filed in the Eastern Pennsylvania Federal District Court accusing Merck of a longstanding scheme to mislead and defraud Government health authorities worldwide.

Two of Merck’s former employees have accused the pharmaceutical giant of marketing multivalent MMR vaccines under false pretenses. According to the complaint, these vaccines have been mislabeled, misbranded, adulterated and falsely certified as having a 95% efficacy rate.

Before the lawsuit was filed, 21 doctors 1 added their voices to other groups of doctors who are calling for MMR vaccines to be used as a regular booster every 4 – 8 years, in order to control mumps outbreaks.

These doctors all assume that the mumps component of all MMR vaccines have the 95 – 98% efficacy promised by Merck.

However, the court documents filed by two Merck virologists meticulously detail how Merck ostensibly manipulated test results for decades in order to create a false 95% efficacy rate for the mumps component of their multivalent MMR vaccines.

The former Merck virologists contend that the multivalent mumps component has a vastly reduced efficacy which is directly responsible for mumps outbreaks during the last decade which prompted international calls for MMR booster shots every 4 – 8 years.

Virologists Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski describe how Merck had to recertify the mumps component in 2000, in order to comply with regulatory requirements in order for the mumps component to be included in two new multivalent MMR vaccines.

The usual test, which had certified the mumps component’s efficacy in the 60’s, failed when used in 2000.

They claim the results were so low Merck decided to change its own test protocol by testing the vaccine against the weakened mumps vaccine virus instead of the wild (naturally circulating) mumps virus.

When that modification didn’t result in the desired 95% efficacy figure, Merck’s executive directors of vaccine research, Drs Alan Shaw and Emilio Emini, instructed Drs David Krah and Mary Yagodich to implement a vast array of modifications to testing procedures3, then, allegedly pressured both Krahling and Wlochowski to participate.

When these modifications also failed to demonstrate the desired 95% efficacy rate, it is alleged that Drs Shaw and Emini instructed Drs Krah and Yagovich to abandon “gold standard” testing, and implement a new procedure, supposedly with the agreement of FDA, which included adding animal antibodies to human blood samples taken both pre and post vaccination4.

By combining the very low levels of human antibodies with animal antibodies, a much higher total level of virus neutralization was obtained than could occur from human antibodies alone.

 The human antibody levels alone would never protect in the real world against wild mumps.

 But after adding animal antibodies, the human blood samples which had previously failed under the old “gold standard” testing were retested using the “enhanced” protocols and passed with flying colors.

New ‘enhanced’ tests showed 100% efficacy, not against wild mumps virus, but against the mumps vaccine virus.

However, combining the animal and human antibodies led to a new problem. In some of the tests more than 80% of pre-vaccine blood samples now showed up as immune.

Usually, the highest number of pre-vaccine immune results any scientist could expect is 10%.

Further manipulations of the animal antibody levels failed to bring the pre-vaccine blood test results down to the expected 10% levels.

According to the complaint, Merck then implemented additional ‘creative’ strategies to show a lack of seroconversion in immune samples in an attempt to reduce the pre-vax level to the expected 10% because had the FDA seen the high numbers of “immune” pre-vaccine samples they would have easily detected the fraudulent test procedures.

Krahling and Wlochowski worked with the same team conducting these tests, but were outraged at what they deemed to be gross scientific deception and fraudulent practices.

When Drs Krahling and Wlochowski attempted to stop what they saw as, “wholesale fabrication of test data to reach its preordained 95% efficacy threshold,” Merck allegedly made various attempts to prevent them, including threatening to jail Dr. Krahling should he inform the FDA.

Despite these efforts, Dr Krahling made numerous calls to FDA.

These calls remained unanswered until Dr. Krahling reported to the FDA that Dr. Krah had removed and/or destroyed Dr. Krahling’s evidence.

An FDA agent then came and interviewed Dr. Krah, who apparently told the agent whatever was necessary to allay their concerns. The agent made no attempt to interview any other personnel, check any facilities, laboratory notebooks, or samples to corroborate what had been reported to them.

The lawsuit claims that to this day, Merck has consistently misrepresented the potency by simply quoting the 40 year old data from the pre-MMR monovalent mumps vaccine, thereby misrepresenting the efficacy of four multivalent vaccines: MMR, MMRII, Europe’s MMRvaxpro, and ProQuad, which is MMR plus chickenpox.

According to the two whistleblowers, not only have all the multivalent MMR vaccines been sold under false pretenses, but, as a result of this LACK OF EFFICACY, there have been numerous mumps outbreaks worldwide prompting calls for regular MMR boosters throughout life.

These mumps outbreaks were predicted by Merck’s Dr Krah 6in 2001, yet Merck allegedly ‘willfully’ withheld this information from multiple governments while consistently claiming there was no need for a new mumps component.8 

The question is, “If the mumps component is actually 95% effective, as stated, would experts be calling for lifelong boosters every 4 – 8 years?”

Has Merck turned over a new leaf since the recent Vioxx Scandal?

Do they still put profit before people?

Read the complaint, follow the court case, examine the evidence, and decide for yourself.

References:
1. http://journals.cambridge.org

2. Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

3. See pgs 10 and 11 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

4. See page 12 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

5. See page 22 No. 64 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

6. See page27/d82; 28/85 and page 40 first two lines – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

7. See page 29/86 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

8. See page 29/87 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

By Hilary Butler, Contributing Author from New Zealand.

Please visit our site at http://sanevax.org/.

About the author:
THE SANE VAX MISSION is to promote Safe, Affordable, Necessary & Effective vaccines and vaccination practices through education and information. We believe in science-based medicine.

Our primary goal is to provide the information necessary for you to make informed decisions regarding your health and well-being.

We also provide referrals to helpful resources for those unfortunate enough to have experienced vaccine-related injuries. 

We are demanding the HPV vaccines be taken off the market until an independent study on their safety and efficacy has been conducted.

Until then, we are committing our efforts to an educational media campaign to alert the public about the dangers of the HPV vaccines. 

SANE Vax, Inc. is involved in the ground-breaking production of the One More Girl Documentary which will premier in 2012.

Please join our cause by contributing to this project by contacting Ryan Richardson, Producer at ryan@onemoregirlfilm.com.

For more information, please visit our site at http://sanevax.org/.

=================================================

Articles Related to This Article:

• Merck litigation strategy – destroy expert witnesses

• Leaked documents show Merck knew of Vioxx dangers, yet hid them for years

• Merck Caught in Massive Scientific Fraud as In-House Authors were Disguised as Independent Scientists (opinion)

• Former head of CDC lands lucrative job as president of Merck vaccine division (opinion)

• Merck caught in scandal to bury Vioxx heart attack risks, intimidate scientists and keep pushing dangerous drugs; Vioxx lawsuits now forming

• Merck employees had “hit list” of doctors they sought to “neutralize”, court documents reveal (opinion)

END

 

 

 

 

Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

3 Responses to “REAL NEWS June 29, 2012”

  1. Fantastic Sites…

    […]this is absolutely fantastic, added your site to my list[…]…

    Like

  2. Barry Oze Roff…

    […]REAL NEWS June 29, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…

    Like

  3. the news beat…

    […]REAL NEWS June 29, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: