DaniMartExtras, Too


REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on August 1, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : August 01, 2012


Higgins Post : Militarized Police Deployed Against Civilians In Anaheim CA


Anaheim CA - Militarized Police Deployed Against Civilians

From Alexander Higgins Blog

Alexander Higgins

  Posted by  – July 31, 2012

Via Reddit: ‘Footage from protest in Anaheim- a glimpse of what’s to come? This video scares me.’

Via Reddit


Prepare for the police state :










































” Sir, there are simply not enough sources to back your claim.”,  he say’s as he buries his head back in sand. 

Video License – Creative Commons
Attribution Required: https://www.youtube.com/user/sarcasticfrench


Related Posts :








We live inside an electric universe



From Half Past Human.com

By Clif High – July 31, 2012

We live inside an electric universe.

The sun is electric at the core of all its activities, not nuclear as suggested in last century.

It must also be acknowledged that even nuclear radioactivity is but a difference in expression of electricity, rather than a difference of kind of energy.

The earth is electric, and produces and interacts with vast numbers of electromagnetic grids naturally occurring.

Humans are electric, and take great delight in playing with the essence of their very nature, electricity.

Humans also produce and interact with vast numbers of electromagnetic grids, many not natural, nor native to earth.

You are electric, and as such are also an electricity sensor array of great and subtle power.

When the little hairs on the back of your neck go straight up and quiver like a conehead at moons alignment as you pass that dark alley, you are registering the electric potential (voltage) of the bastard deep in the shadows waiting to jack the next fellow walking by.

Of course, he was hoping that you were so inebriated (intoxicated) as to have shut down your electrical sensors for danger.

Since we are all electric in an all electric universe, it makes sense (pun intended) that we are sensors to all things electric…..including the future.

In an electric universe, where all motion (expression of time), is electrically powered at the most fundamental level, future manifestations have a form of pre-expression that has been demonstrated by humans (and animals) forever.

This pre-manifestation future, is also pre-electric, but so are we, thus our ability to sense it.

Western science places such expressions under the category of ‘psychic’ occurrences.

This is merely a label, and an attempt at control of a segment of reality that frequently defies such control efforts of the mainstream mindset.

In an electric universe, energy matters.

It is this key element.

Energy IS universe.

 Therefore, in the continuous creation-destruction model of universe that i favor, the idea that there is everything (past, present, future) all expressing themselves in all possible variations (timelines), is wrong.

Such is just too wasteful of energy, and does not fit the expressed fractal patterns of how energy is manifest within the material universe.

In the continuous creation-destruction model of universe, there are not multiple timelines.

Rather there is a ‘reality manifestation membrane’ (yes, similar to how string theory represents their idea of ‘branes’) through which reality is expressed.

This ‘membrane’ is interactive with our consciousness, both individually and collectively.

Please note, this includes all beings in universe, not merely humans.

As we all (planets, aliens, worms, sea cucumbers, orangoutans, et al) interact individually with the ‘reality manifestation membrane’, we are also, at too many levels to track, interacting with each other through the membrane.

The complexity of these interactions are so vast that our minds place a filter on how we perceive the whole thing, and thus the illusion of solidity and matter are created.

While universe powers us (all beings) individually, we, collectively, power the ‘variation’ in universe.

Because we are all, in our vast numbers, interacting with the reality manifestation membrane, individually, we all make changes in the membrane that affect all other beings in their interactions with the membrane.

Thus we have the practical appearance of an infinite level of variation.

And that should be clear as this side of the moon during an eclipse.

The reason that this is pertinent has to do with the Farsight.org 2012 experiment.

This experiment was ingeniously designed to actively involve universe at a non human level within the results.

It worked.

It does not, in my opinion, prove the idea of multiple timelines as i have an alternate view of how universe chooses to express itself.

However, it does, in my opinion, prove the effectiveness (next year) of remote viewing as a tool for decision making.

In the continuous creation-destruction model, the Farsight 2012 experiment validates many of the ‘irrevocable process’ descriptions of time provided by Kozyrev in his work (yes, some of his stuff was measuring hyperdimensional effects, but he also nailed the temporal interactive field (membrane)).

In the view of the ‘irrevocable process’, the up coming 2012/2013 disruptions on earth are even now ‘building up’ on the ‘other side’ of the membrane, and that is how the remote viewers in the Farsight experiment picked them up.

As well as how our own work described the ‘global coastal event’ some years back.

In the view of the multiple timelines concept of reality, there are an infinite variation of everything happening all at once.

This idea works against demonstrable energy flows in the material universe, but it is a convenient method of thinking about possibilities.

However, it has some flaws that are inherent in the lack of complexity being considered, and (in my opinion) makes for potential errors in thinking.

In the view of multiple timelines, some events are so large that ‘all timelines must go through them’.

In this view of multiple timelines of the ‘now’, infinitely expressing simultaneously, there is the erroneous idea that one could ‘shift timelines’.

Even in within this understanding of universe this would not be possible, as your local consciousness could not ‘shift’ itself out of any temporal ‘river’ in which it was placed.

Not without huge amounts of energy…the energy required to rip your atoms from that stream….so consciousness will not affect your timeline, under this model.

In the ‘shifting your timeline theory’, you could ‘decide’ to make certain decisions certain ways, but the argument that any action thus taken would alter your timeline is spurious.

Rather it is much easier to conceive of it as being mere determinism forced upon you by the particular timeline (in this model) in which you happen to reside.

In this idea you were forced by the timeline you are in to make those decisions that way, even as you think you are changing your timeline by so doing.

The ‘proof’ offered is that you never end up with exactly the timeline viewed by the future forecasters (prophets, remote viewers, all of us nutters).

You could just as easily say that the reason that the future never works out as viewed is that you were ‘seeing’ the other timeline.

Of course it is all very complex (the multiple timelines model) as your consciousness must necessarily be spread across your identity in multiple timelines.

This is what is cited as evidence for the theory (self referential so must be discounted) of multiple timelines, as well as being the mechanism, under this model, whereby remote viewers can foresee the future…sometimes.

This ‘sometimes’ qualifier is pertinent as, when they are inaccurate, the ‘other timeline being seen’ is cited as the reason.

As an aside, those in law enforcement will recognize this as the SODDI defense (some other dude did it).

In this case, it is some other timeline that was seen, and thus that is the reason for inaccuracy of future forecasts in this multiple timeline model of reality.

It never occurred to me to consider universe in this light in my own work (or i could have claimed to never been wrong…some other time line did it)….rather i use the continuous creation/destruction model in my thinking and our work here at HPH.(Half Past Human)

So in our model, the reality expression membrane is what the remote viewers are feeling up to get their views of things non local.

It is also this reality expression membrane that exerts pressure (electrical) on you and all other humans, thus causing y’all to leak out changes in your language that i picked up in my work for our future forecasts.

Now note that my view does not diminish the importance of the Farsight work.

It still has universe intruding through their experiment to warn of devastation just ahead……but in my opinion it does not prove multiple timelines.

The deviation in viewing in their experiment has to do with how it was structured.

In the structure of the experiment a key element is whether or not mainstream academia admits to remote viewing and extra terrestrial life.

So, inadvertently, what has been captured, has been a particular layer of interaction between all of us humans, and the reality manifesting membrane.

It does not matter, by the way, whether i am correct in my view, or if the multiple timelines model is a more accurate expression of how universe is organized.

We still have the Farsight.org experiment results slapping us in the face and yelling “Yo, humanity, wake up!”

July 31,2012

Copyright…all rights reserved, no copying without attribution.

And as i point out, one would be courting folly claiming words as the above.

In times such as these, thinking is its own punishment.









Petition To Put Bankers In Jail Passes 350,000 Signatures In Two Days


From The Daily Bail

UPDATE – The online petition was started 2 weeks ago, already has more than 650,000signatures, and is growing by 1,000 names every few hours.

Though focused on criminal EU bankers, the signatures are global in origin.

Jon Corzine, your time is coming…

And here’s another:

Thank you!









IMF’s Lagarde: U.S. Fiscal Cliff Key Global Risk


From Silver Doctors

Posted on: July 30th, 2012 by The Doc

The IMF’s Christine Lagarde stated Thursday that the number one global risk was not the Euro-zone debt crisis, but rather the ‘looming US fiscal cliff.

Lagarde’s statement went unreported in the US as it slices open everything MSM MOPE continually attempts to obfuscate by continually harping on the Euro-crisis.

The US is Greece Times 100.

LONDON (MNI) – The looming US fiscal cliff is the number one risk globally at present, followed by the Eurozone and then the threat of another oil price surge, IMF head Christine Lagarde says.

Lagarde, speaking at the Global Investment Conference here, said the Eurozone is clearly at the epicentre of the crisis right now but is far from the only risk at present.

“Risk number one … is clearly the fiscal cliff in the United States of America, where the deficit and debt to GDP ratios are actually worse than in the Eurozone,” she said.

Although the US does not face the Eurozone’s challenge of trying to secure accords with a host of states, its legislators are also struggling to take action.

“There is great uncertainty as to how Congress is going to actually deal with this fiscal cliff,” she said.

If the US does go over the cliff it could have an initial contractionary effect on growth of 1 percentage point, the IMF estimates. 

Read more








 Do Banksters Kill Countless Millions Of People?

From rense.com

By Bob Livingston – July 28, 2012

In the public’s mind, the war trials following World War II demonstrated that evil must be vanquished and punished.

But the Nuremberg Trials were simply a propaganda showcase.

In reality, the only difference between the “good guys” and the “bad guys” was that the “good guys”had more guns.

What the people of the world did not see and still do not understand is that the real issues of World War II were never allowed to come up for public debate — certainly not at the Nuremberg Trials.

The issue was that both sides prosecuted the war with paper money.

What are the facts?

The facts are that both combatants were equally guilty of promoting esoteric warfare on their own populations as well as on each other.

Someone(s) who wanted to initiate a new world human drama lined up and supplied both sides.

The cost of human life was incidental to the money creators. But if there is a “cause,”people will die and sacrifice their own flesh.

Both the United States and Germany should have been on trial at Nuremberg, Germany in 1945 for war crimes.

Oh, the German high command was guilty all right — but no less so than the U.S. or British high command.

It is not debatable that both sides sent millions of their own young soldiers to an early death. Both sides also killed millions of civilians.

And the allied powers, fighting ostensibly to keep Europe free from Nazism, condemned millions of Eastern Europeans to years of suffering the oppression of communism under Russia’s boot heel.

Forget all the propaganda and all the blame and consider the honest answer as to who was at fault on both sides.

Do we want the honest answer?

Can we stand the light of day?

The people who caused the great world wars and all wars that have brought death and suffering to millions of people were the central bankers in other countries and the Federal Reserve Bank in the United States.

Central banks create paper money and credit for government and politicians to spend for war and their socialist agenda.

All of the money and credit now crushing the American people was created by the U.S. central bank, the Federal Reserve (which is neither Federal, nor does it hold reserves).

It is owned, as it has been since its beginning, by a few bankster families in the United States and Europe.

Your local banker is probably innocent in this scheme.

I doubt if one person in 1,000 — and that includes most bank employees — has a clue as to how money is created by banks.

Banks don’t have loads of paper money in their vaults.

When they start to make a customer loan, they just create the money with a bookkeeping entry.

It costs the bank nothing, but the customer has to pay interest.

Bankers big and small love this system, as do politicians.

This gives them a silent and unfair advantage over the people.

Paper money and credit are the licenses for all the evil that the human mind of man can conjure up and create.

Central bankers have demonstrated in the past 100 years that with a stroke of a computer digit they can create trillions of dollars as easily as they can $1.

Yes, they create these dollars out of nothing, but you have to work for your dollars.

Printing-press money is the means and motivation for endless wars and endless death and suffering, courtesy of the banksters.

This is banker blood money and with it they devalue all the money in circulation.

It is an insidious confiscation of wealth that not one person in 1 million understands or is even aware of.

Devaluation of the currency is the prime and silent purpose of banker-created money.

Even at this hour, devaluation is impoverishing Americans by reducing and diluting the purchasing power of their money.

This goes on all the time, even while we sleep.

You can’t bury your money deep enough to save it from the money creators.

It is all very simple.

The more money the banksters create, the less yours is worth.

The point of this article is that World War I, World War II and any war that we can think of — including the wars in the Mideast — would not last more than a few days without the banksters creating money to prosecute war.

Wars have to be funded.

Bankster-created money is the blood of war as well as the impoverishment of the people.

All central bankers create the money for war and death.

Paper money appears in the absence of the gold standard.

Banksters and politicians hate the gold standard because the gold standard disciplines them and the bureaucrats to the rule of law.

Banksters create the money for war and death.

The discipline of the gold standard would have prevented all the wars of the past 100 years.

Millions of soldiers have died for nothing, as have millions of civilians.

Did your history book mention this?

Likud, Kadima, Labor, or new centrist party leadership hardly matters.

Israel remains hardline, belligerent, and repressive.

Arab citizens have no rights.

They and most Jews chafe under neoliberal harshness. Instead of improving conditions, they’re worsening.

Malcolm X once said “I see America through the eyes of the victim. 

I don’t see any American dream – I see an American nightmare.”

Israelis face similar harshness.

Remaining rights are eroding en route to being lost altogether.

Populist change demands sustained public rage. Nothing else can work.


Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”


Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon.

All programs are archived for easy listening.









Obama, NATO To Blame For Murder Of 1000s Of Civilians In Syria


(XANIEL’S NOTE : Barry (the Obama) Soetoro, ‘ Nobel Peace Prize Winner ‘ ??  Who the hell decided that ?  

I think these people who hand out these prizes have lost ALL credibility !

And NATO is nothing more than an Army for the Elite doing mostly the ‘ WILL ‘ of the Banksters.

NATO always uses the excuse that they are attacking for humanitarian reasons,

but they are always the ones causing the ‘ Crimes Against Humanity ‘ start with, and later,  end with !}~~~Xaniel777



 Barry (the Obama) Soetoro,

“A U.S. embarrassment “~~Xaniel777 


From Alexander Higgins Blog

Posted by  – July 30, 2012 

Michael Chossudovsky details how Obama and NATO terrorists are really to blame for murder of thousands of civilians in Syria being blamed on the government.

Obama, NATO Tp Blame For Murder Of 1000s Of Civilians In Syria

Press TV “There is ample documentation to the effect that the Free Syrian Army which is supported by NATO and the United States has committed unspoken atrocities against the civilian population; and this is documented – it’s even documented by the Vatican,” said Professor Michael Chossudovsky, director of Center for Research on Globalization, in a Sunday interview with Press TV.

US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said on Sunday that the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has lost all legitimacy by attacking the armed groups in the city.

Panetta claimed the Syrian government has been “attacking its own people in Aleppo” and that “Assad’s regime is coming to an end and has lost all legitimacy”.

“These are very strong statements because they accuse, they imply an accusation directed against President Bashar al-Assad to the effect that the Syrian government ordered these killings when, in fact, the Free Syrian Army – I’m talking about the killing of civilians – the Free Syrian Army is involved, and we know it, in terrorist activities right from day one for more than 16 months,” Chossudovsky explained.

He further added that the Obama administration and Leon Panetta should be held responsible for the killing of the Syrian civilians adding that they are “threats directed against a sovereign country”.

The Canadian analyst also argued that any foreign intervention in Syria is “the breakdown of international law”.

“Unfortunately, the broader public is mislead because the truth is being withheld as to the nature of this military intervention where the so-called Free Syrian Army are essentially the foot soldiers of the Western military alliance. The Western military alliance is in the process of recruiting terrorists with the support of Qatar and Saudi Arabia,” he concluded.

Stay up to date with the latest news :

Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/kr3at

Facebook: http://facebook.com/alexhiggins732

Live TV And Videos: Higgins TV

Website: The Alexander Higgins Blog

Headlines: Real-time News Headlines

Related Posts :









( ORIGINAL TITLE :  To understand the history of Palestinian dispossession look to the words of Zionist and Israeli leaders )


The Stealing -and Ethnic Cleansing – of Palestine

The War of Ideas in the Middle East

From Mondoweiss

by  on July 31, 2012

View all posts by Adam Horowitz →

Henry Clifford, the 83-year-old Connecticut man who funded a billboard a New York MTA train line illustrating Israel’s expanding control over historic Palestine, responded to his critics in a letter to the lower Hudson Valley Journal News:

As the sponsor of the ads displayed at Metro-North Railroad stations, allow me to respond to the article by Scott Richman and Larry Grossman of the American Jewish Committee/Westchester.

It would require volumes to recount the history of Palestine, the Jewish settlement there and the creation of the State of Israel, so I will focus only on the subject matter illustrated by the maps referenced in my ads — using, not my words, but those of Zionist and Israeli leaders.

Theodor Herzl, the founder of Zionism, wrote: “We shall have to spirit the penniless population (the Arabs) across the border … while denying it any employment in our own country.”

Chaim Weizmann, the first president of Israel, said: “Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.”

David Ben-Gurion, the first prime minister of Israel, wrote: “I favor partition because when we become a strong power we will abolish partition and spread throughout Palestine.”

He also said: “Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … we are the aggressors and they defend themselves”; and wrote this: “If I were an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural, we have taken their country.”

Also, in a letter to his son: “We will expel the Arabs and take their place.”

Moshe Sharett, Israel’s first foreign minister and second prime minister, is quoted in “Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict” as saying: “We have forgotten that we have not come to an empty land to inherit it, but we have come to conquer a country from people inhabiting it.”

Moshe Dayan, Israeli Defense Forces chief of staff and later defense minister, was a straight talker: “There is not one single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.”

Richman and Grossman tell us that in 1967, “the Arab world threatened Israel with destruction.”

Here’s what then-Prime Minister Menachem Begin said in 1982: “In June 1967, we had a choice. The Egyptian army concentration in the Sinai approaches did not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

The Arabs did not initiate the war, Israel did.








Israel ex-minister of military affairs says Iran strike ‘catastrophic’


From PressTV

Israel’s former minister for military affairs, Shaul Mofaz (file photo)

Israel’s former minister for military affairs, Shaul Mofaz (file photo)

Israel’s former minister for military affairs Shaul Mofaz has warned of the “catastrophic” consequences of a possible strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

“We need to ask ourselves… two questions,” Mofaz said in an interview with Israel’s Channel 2 on Saturday. 

“Will an early attack by Israel change Iran’s strategic situation regarding the nuclear program. My answer is no. And the second question is, will an early strike by Israel, in the current circumstances, in the existing situation in the Middle East…will an early attack lead to war?” Mofaz questioned. 

“My answer is that the probability for this is very high,” he stated.

The Kadima leader further criticized his hawkish rival, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for his “manipulative” posing of a nuclear Iran as an “existential threat” to Israel.

Washington and Tel Aviv have repeatedly threatened Tehran with a military strike to force it to halt its nuclear energy program, claimed by the duo to have been directed towards the acquisition of military nuclear capability. 

But Iran has dismissed the allegations and the threats, pledging a crushing response to any attack on its soil. 

Unlike Israel, Iran is a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and its nuclear activities have been frequently inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency. 

The UN’s nuclear watchdog, however, has not found a shred of evidence to substantiate US and Israel’s claims. 

Israel is widely known to be the sole possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, holding an arsenal of between 200 and 300 atomic warheads. 



Related Stories :








How the Republican Party Stole the Nomination from Ron Paul


From the Trenches World Report

Posted on July 31, 2012 by Admin

Jaret Glenn  If you follow mainstream election coverage, you might think Mitt Romney has coasted to an honest, easy, well-deserved Republican nomination. Unfortunately for Republican voters, nothing could be further from the truth.

The primary process has been an all-out slugfest and many of the delegates Romney has won may be the result of dirty tricks and even election fraud.

The following narrative includes links to reports, first-hand testimonials, and video evidence highlighting actions taken by the GOP to ensure a Romney victory, at the expense of fracturing the party just prior to the general election.

Party leaders at the county and state level have changed or violated party rules, cancelled caucuses, changed vote counts, thrown out entire counties of votes, counted public votes privately, called-in the SWAT team, and inexplicably replaced Paul delegates with Romney delegates to block Ron Paul from winning the nomination.

Iowa: Days before the caucuses, Paul held a commanding lead in the polls and all the momentum, with every other candidate having peaked from favorable media coverage and then collapsed under the ensuing scrutiny.

Establishment Republicans, like Iowa’s Representative Steve King (R), attempted to sabotage Paul’s campaign by spreading rumors he would lose to Obama if nominated.

Even though the Iowa GOP platform reads like a Ron Paul speech, shortly before the caucuses, Iowa Governor Terry Barnstad told Politico , [If Paul wins] people are going to look at who comes in second and who comes in third. If Romney comes in a strong second, it definitely helps him going into New Hampshire”.

The message from the Governor to voters of his state was: a vote for Ron Paul was a wasted vote.

Huffington Post reported that Paul was ahead by one point over Romney and Rick Santorum in entrance polls conducted by Edison Media Research for the AP before the caucuses.

For the first time ever, the Iowa GOP changed the final vote count to a secret location .

After the caucus, results from 8 precincts (including those with colleges, in a state where Paul won 48% of the youth vote) went missing.

Interestingly, these were all precincts Romney lost in 2008.

In addition, GOP officials discovered inaccuracies in 131 precincts.

Though polling in a comfortable first place, Paul finished third in this non-binding straw poll, behind Romney and Santorum.

Iowa originally reported Romney in first, Santorum in a close second, and Paul third.

After the recount, Santorum was named the winner with Romney in second.

No mention was given to how the recount affected Paul’s vote count. Iowa GOP chairman, Matt Strawn, later resigned and was replaced by Paul supporter, A.J. Spiker and Paul went on to win the majority of delegates.


Florida: The Florida GOP broke party rules by switching to a winner-take-all state before the date allowed, which favors the candidate with the most money for advertisingand attack ads. 

Senior Advisor to the Ron Paul campaign, Doug Wead, claims this was done specifically to favor Romney.


Nevada: There is bad blood between Paul’s supporters and establishment Republicans in Nevada.

This dates back to 2008, when Convention Chair, Sue Lowden and her enlisted delegates got up and walked out of the convention when it became apparent Paul’s supporters would claim a majority of the delegates.

She claimed she would reconvene at a later time, but instead approved the McCain slate of delegates.

This year, Paul supporters expected shenanigans; so his State Chairman, Carl Bunce, planned to win by outworking Romney.

Just before the caucuses, he claimed to have more IDs than Romney had votes in ’08″.

This means through canvassing door-to-door and phoning voters, he had identified about 25,000 voters committed to show up and vote for Paul.

On caucus day, the media was denied access to most caucus sites and the few that were permitted were not allowed to take photos.

Others were even ejected from sites. 

This CNN clip shows GOP staff preventing a Paul supporter from entering the premises to vote at a special caucus that was set up at the last minute for Newt Gingrich backer, Sheldon Adelson.

Here, participants were asked to sign an affidavit (under penalty of perjury) stating they were Jewish and couldn’t vote earlier in the day due to “religious reasons”.

CNN showed live coverage of votes being counted at this event, with Paul amassing nearly 60% of the votes.

In some precincts in Clark County, the largest in Nevada, the number of ballots did not match the number of voters signed in at the caucus.

Though votes were to be counted publicly, they were largely counted in private.

The vote count was also inexplicably dragged out for several days, leading to a victory for Romney.

Nevada State GOP Chairwoman, Amy Tarkanian resigned the day after the caucuses.

Another interesting note is that Paul’s 2012 votes had doubled, tripled, and more than quadrupled his 2008 votes in every state leading up to the Nevada caucuses, yet Paul received only 88 more votes there.

Of all the places for this to occur, Nevada, the country’s most libertarian state; is the last in which anyone would expect this.

In spite of these irregularities , Paul won 22 of 25 state delegates and replaced state party officials with Paul supporters.

Romney supporters then formed their own state party, called “Team Nevada”.

The RNC then bypassed the official state party in order to organize for Romney and send all funds to Team Nevada.


Colorado: Romney supporters were caught passing out fake Ron Paul slates at the state convention.

The RNC has not investigated or even commented on the matter.


Minnesota: Doug Wead, claims the state party instructed members not to vote for any delegates under age fifty because most young delegates support Paul.


Missouri: WXIX Cincinnati’s Ben Swann covered the fiasco in Clay County, Missouri’s largest county.

Temporary Chairman, Eugene Dokes, started the meeting by banning video recording devices, a first for this event. 

Robert’s Rules of Order require the temporary chairman to accept nominations and elect a convention chairman to run the event.

Instead, he appointed a chair of his choice.

The crowd immediately erupted with booing.

Shortly after, Dokes adjourned the meeting without the required two-thirds majority, called the police on attendees, and left.

In adherence to state rules, Paul supporter, Brent Stafford, along with one of the top parliamentarians in the state, reconvened in the parking lot and attempted to resume the event.

Shortly after, the SWAT team arrived and arrested Stafford, who was following state party rules.

Dokes later admitted on talk radio that he and other state party officials deliberately broke the rules to prevent Paul from winning.


Maine: Ben Swann reported on shenanigans in Maine .

Even though only 84% of votes had been counted; State GOP Chairman, Charlie Webster, declared Romney the winner over Paul by less than 200 votes.

Hancock and Washington Counties hadn’t voted yet because Webster cancelled the caucuses due to an impending snowstorm, promising they could vote later and their votes would be counted.

The snowstorm never occurred and he later reneged on his promise, telling voters in those counties their votes would not be counted after all.

Washington County was Paul’s strongest in the state in 2008.

Though other states with close outcomes held recounts, this was never a consideration for Maine.

At least one of the counties that did vote claims the state party recorded its tallies incorrectly.

Matt McDonald, pastor of a small community church in Belfast, was nominated as the chairman of his caucus.

He says the state instructed the caucus chairmen not to read any of the vote totals aloud, but rather to send the results straight to Augusta without a public reading.

McDonald made a motion to change this rule, and it was approved unanimously.

McDonald says 22 voters showed up, resulting in 8 votes for Paul, 7 for Santorum, 5 for Romney, and 2 undecided.

When he called the votes into Augusta, he was told they already had the results and the totals read 9 for Romney, 5 or Santorum, and 2 for Paul.

When McDonald told her the tally had been counted publicly, he says “her voice changed and she said…we’ll record this”.

Doug Wead claims, “On every occasion, the votes that were lost were Ron Paul votes and the person responsible for reporting them were Mitt Romney supporters…in one case the votes were actually transferred from paper to…a computer and the lady doing the transfer was a Mitt Romney person”.

To date, these tallies have not been corrected and Romney is still credited with the straw vote win while the media continues to report that Paul never won a state contest.


Arizona: The Examiner’s Kevin Kervick reports “ballot stuffing, rule violations, and improper vote counting that occurred behind closed doors” at the convention. In addition, Paul supporters allege threats of physical violence from Romney supporters.


Michigan: Doug Wead reports, ” Michigan, unlike any other state…had a special party rule forbidding any precinct delegate vacancies from being filled at county conventions until after the state delegates and alternates were chosen.

In other words, countless Ron Paul supporters attending county convention were forcibly blocked…because they weren’t elected precinct delegates in 2010-long before the Ron Paul 2012 campaign began”.

Wead also claims “documented instances in multiple counties where county party officials “edited” the state delegation lists after the county conventions adjourned”.


Wyoming:commenter on Paul supporter website, DailyPaul.com, explains how members of the Republican Executive Committee (all Romney supporters) illegally cast votes in the delegate selection vote.


Washington: At the state convention , a Ron Paul delegate claimed bubble ballot sheets were withheld in King County’s district 36.

He also claims the 37 th district caucus was forced to conduct the meeting outside because Chairwoman, Lori Sotelo, was irritated when a Ron Paul supporter was elected to run the caucus, instead of her choice.

Ben Swann interviewed a voter in Pierce County, Washington; who claims the local Republican leadership passed out what they called a “unity slate” to voters and said it represented an equal distribution of delegates committed to Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich.

The plan was to organize to block Ron Paul supporters, who outnumbered the other candidates’ supporters, from receiving the lion’s share of the delegates.

The Republican leadership prevailed.


Alaska: In spite of last-minute rule changes and violations of party rules, Paul supporters ousted longtime state chairman, Randy Ruedrich, and voted-in Paul supporter, Russ Millette.

 Ruedrich then tried to sabotage the state convention and transferred all of the state party’s $100,000 to the local Capital City Republicans in Juneau, effectively bankrupting the party now controlled by Paul supporters.


Georgia: This video shows GOP Chairwoman, Sue Everhart, at the Athens Clarke County GOP meeting admitting “shoddy treatment of the Ron Paul people at that [2008] convention” and publicly apologizing.

She presents the rule book that she helped to write and claims it won’t happen again.

The video then shows the actual convention and party leaders breaking those rules to force their pre-selected slate of delegates and prevent Paul’s supporters from electing their own.

Party leaders then adjourned the meeting illegally and ran out of the meeting.


Massachusetts: Paul won 16 of the 27 delegates selected so far in Romney’s home state.

In addition, he swept all 6 from Romney’s home county.

As a result (for the first time ever in the state), delegates were asked to sign an affidavit stating ” I certify under the pain and penalty of perjury, that on the first ballot at the 2012 Republican National Convention, I will affirmatively Vote for Mitt Romney, the winner of the 2012 Massachusetts Presidential Primary.”

The state GOP then covered up Romney’s embarrassing loss by invalidating ballots and ousting the Paul delegates.


North Dakota: Ben Swann reports the selection of delegates was unfair: the GOP handed out pre-printed ballots with a slate of delegates with 60% of them being Mitt Romney supporters in a state where he won only 26% of the vote.


Oklahoma: Kevin Kervick of The Examiner reports that the Oklahoma convention had to be moved to the parking lot because Robert’s Rules were ignored, delegate credentials were not verified, a convention chair was never appointed, motions made from the floor were ignored, the Chairman illegally elected a slate of Romney delegates, and the convention was closed without a two-thirds majority vote.

Consistent with Robert’s Rules, Paul supporters reconvened in the parking lot to elect delegates.

Paul supporters have now filed a law suit to ensure their delegates will be seated.


Virginia: Doug Wead claims “at a district convention, they coaxed the Ron Paul delegation outside and then locked the door.

The pastor of the church that was hosting the event was, himself, locked out”.


U.S. Virgin Islands: Ron Paul won his first caucus, only to have the GOP take down the straw vote results from their website showing Paul the victor with 29% over Romney’s 26% and replaced with a note from the party claiming Romney won because he won more delegates.

Paul’s Official Campaign Blogger, Jack Hunter, explains how every other contest determined the victor by the straw vote, except the one straw vote Paul won.


Alabama: An inexplicable gap exists between Paul’s popular vote count and his delegate vote count.

This is odd because voters choose both on the same day and on the same ballot.

Alabama Republican Party rules state that voters can only vote for one candidate and then must choose between his delegates.

Statewide, Paul received only about one-third as many votes as his delegates.

This means voters chose another candidate, but selected Paul’s delegates.

No other candidate’s totals showed a similar pattern.


Louisiana: Ben Swann reports a clash between the old Louisiana State GOP leadership and newly-elected leaders who support Paul.

Old Chairman, Roger Villere, angered attendees with last-minute rule changes the night before the convention.

At the start of the convention, Villere attempted to recognize the former Chair of the Rules Committee, who had been voted out the night before.

When new Chair, Alex Helwig, rose to address the delegation; Villere instructed security (comprised of off-duty Shreveport Police) to remove him .

They arrested him for trespassing and broke several of his fingers.

Next, an overwhelming majority elected a new Convention Chair, Paul supporter Alex Helwig.

Members then turned their chairs to face Helwig, with their backs to Villere.

In desperation, Villere instructed the police officers to remove the duly-elected Herford.

They did so and dislocated his hip in the process, sending him to the emergency room. 

The reconvened group followed state party rules and went on to elect a majority of Paul delegates, which the state party later replaced with its own slate of Romney delegates. 

The Paul campaign has appealed to the RNC, but it is unlikely that the RNC will reinstate the Paul delegates.


Oregon:  This YouTube video shows establishment Republicans in Congressional District 4 attempting to steal the ballot box and leave the premises when it became apparent the Ron Paul supporters were in the majority.  

A Paul supporter is chased away from the ballots and claims he was accosted by an establishment party member.


Wisconsin: MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell reports Romney violated state campaign laws by bribing voters with free subs.


In other states, Paul supporters claim vote-flipping occurred with electronic voting machines.

Once about 40% of votes are reported, there is typically little variation in the final numbers.

However on several occasions, at about 40% Romney’s trajectory “flipped” with the leader, which was often Paul. 

Austin Election Judge, Anne Beckett, has come forth publicly to claim she witnessed this firsthand.

Baseless allegations or a few isolated incidents may not be cause for concern, but there is enough video evidence in this report to disturb anyone who cares about fair elections. 

Rule changes, disregard for existing rules, cancelling elections, running off with ballots, secret vote counts, throwing out votes, threats, physical violence, and arbitrary replacement of delegates are activities unbecoming of a democratic society. 

Whether you’re a Ron Paul supporter, or even a Republican, is irrelevant. 

That the Republican Party will seemingly stop at nothing to ensure their selected candidate is the nominee should be deeply troubling for all Americans.








Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~~ Xaniel777



17 Responses to “REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012”

  1. Wedding Photographer cabo…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  2. blog said


    REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too…


  3. this site said

    this site…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  4. living in germany…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  5. don’t click here…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  6. shareyt said


    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  7. filesmonster…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  8. 2012 scion xb…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  9. link building services…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  10. Belfast news…

    REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too…


  11. Homepage said

    … [Trackback]…

    […] Informations on that Topic: danimartextras.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/real-news-aug-01-2012/ […]…


  12. london underground…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  13. free coupon alerts…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  14. deprimieren…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  15. Hotel deal said

    Hotel deal…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  16. american consultants rx…

    […]REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  17. […] REAL NEWS Aug. 01, 2012 (danimartextras.wordpress.com) […]


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.