DaniMartExtras, Too


REAL NEWS Sept 05 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on September 4, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : September 05, 2012


News Alert: military planes spotted dumping radioactive cesium near Fukushima



From Benjamin Fulford’s Blog

September 04, 2012

White Dragon Society affiliates in Fukushima prefecture are reporting that until recently planes have been dumping radioactive cesium on mountainsides in Fukushima prefecture.

These planes have now been banned from Japan but are still dumping radio-active waste elsewhere as a part of the ongoing Fukushima nuclear terror psychological warfare operation.

The planes began dumping the radioactive material in the months following the attack in order to try to force the evacuation of greater Tokyo.

We can also report from multiple Geiger counter readings made in and around Fukushima that heavy rains have washed away most of the original radiation emitted following the March 11, 2011 nuclear and tsunami terror attack.

Message to the mass murdering terrorists: we are coming to get you. There will soon be nowhere left on the planet to hide.








The American People Are Angry



Published on Jun 27, 2012 by 


“The American people are angry.They are angry because they are living through the worst recession since the Great Depression,” said Bernie Sanders said on the floor of the Senate. 



For more information, please visit: http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=15dad430-967e-4179-968c-2d7b0…








TSA Caught In Huge Power Grab!



Published on Sep 3, 2012 by 

TSA thugs are proud of the fact that in all 50 states they are testing peoples drinks and food that is purchased after they pass the abuse and harassment control freak checkpoints of the TSA “officers”.

This is nothing but a power grab where the public are conditioned to put up with any command no matter how mindless.

The airports are tyranny zones where the criminal government test new forms of domination on the sheep like public before rolling it out on the street.


Video Shows TSA’s Bizarre New Security Policy

Federal agency tests drinks purchased inside airport

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, September 3, 2012

A video clip shot yesterday at Columbus Ohio Airport illustrates how the Transportation Security Administration has dreamed up a bizarre new way to waste time and taxpayer dollars – by testing drinks purchased by travelers for explosives inside the airport long after they have already passed security.

The footage shows TSA agents walking around a departure lounge asking to test passengers’ drinks for explosive residue with a swab they hold over the liquid.

“Now remember that this is inside the terminal, well beyond the security check and purchased inside the terminal…just people waiting to get on the plane,” writes the You Tube user who uploaded the video.

“My wife and son came back from a coffee shop just around the corner, then we were approached. I asked them what they were doing. One of the TSA ladies said that they were checking for explosive chemicals (as we are drinking them). I said “really – inside the terminal? You have got to be kidding me.”

I asked them if they wanted to swab us all.

She responded with something like, ‘yes sometimes we need to do that’.

I then asked if she wanted a urine sample…nonetheless, the TSA is way out of control,” he adds, joking that the TSA’s next move could be to visit people’s homes before they even leave for the airport (they’re already in the parking lot demanding to search people who aren’t even flying!)

As we have previously highlighted, the drinks policy was recently introduced with virtually no explanation from the TSA whatsoever. The much vaunted 2006 liquid bomb plot on which this nonsense is all based completely collapsed in court and was revealed to be farcical at best.

Experts have savaged rules relating to liquids being carried through security as pointless and unnecessary and yet they still remain in place six years later, with ludicrous cases routinely popping up of mothers having to drink their own breast milk or even pump it into empty bottles.

But this new rule applies to drinks purchased within the airport after travelers have already passed airport security, items that have presumably already had to pass some form of security check to be brought inside the airport in the first place.

The drinks testing farce has been accompanied by other harebrained TSA schemes which have virtually nothing to do with genuine security and everything to do with subjecting the public to intimidation and obedience training.

The federal agency recently brought in a similarly asinine new policy in which travelers are ordered to “freeze” on command by TSA screeners while passing through security – for no apparent reason other than to check they will obey orders without question.

Perhaps the TSA should concentrate on real security threats and cleaning up the behavior of their own criminally-prone employees instead of harassing travelers who have already been through the ordeal of a grope down or a radiation body scan.

Given the fact that TSA agents now festoon political eventshighways and even prom nights, how long is it before we have blue-shirted goons in fast food restaurants checking whether or not our Diet Cokes are weapons of mass destruction?


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com.

He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.








Mainstream Media (Can You Believe IT ??) begins questioning safety of fluoride



Main Stream Media’s Usual Stance on Truth !

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on September 4, 2012 by Admin

Natural News – Dr. Keith Ablow, a prominent psychiatrist and member of the Fox News ”Medical A-Team,” recently wrote an editorial for the newsgiant that questions the safety of water fluoridation in light of all the recent science illustrating its dangers.

The piece is indicative of an increasing awareness, even within the mainstream media, that Americans have not been told the full story about fluoride, despite having it largely forced on them in the name of promoting dental health.

Citing a recent scientific review compiled by experts at Harvard University that identifies a clear link between fluoride exposure and brain damage, Dr. Ablow rightly presses the issue about whether or not fluoridating public water supplies truly is in the best interests of promoting public health.

 NaturalNews also recently covered the Harvard study, which was published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. (http://www.naturalnews.com/036873_fluoride_lower_IQ_brain_damage.html)

Surprising that it would come from a source like Fox News, Dr. Ablow points out that a comprehensive analysis of 27 different fluoride studies confirms that fluoride damages brain tissue, particularly in unborn babies and young children.

Such exposure to fluoride, which comes not only from drinking fluoridated water but also from bathing in it, ends up significantly lowering the average IQ level among children exposed, the analysis found.

Not only that, fluoride exposure visibly changes cellular structures in the brain,according to Dr. Ablow’s analysis of the study, which in turn increases levels of aluminum in brain tissue.

This aluminum buildup coincides with the formation of beta-amyloid plaques in the brain which, as you may recall, are linked to the development of Alzheimer’s disease and various other forms of dementia.

What the Harvard study confirms, in other words, is that even relatively minimal exposure to fluoride among children and babies is linked to brain development abnormalities, dementia, and other forms of mental illness.

And as we have pointed out numerous times before here at NaturalNewsfluoride also replaces natural iodine in the thyroid and other glands, causing severe hormonal changes that affect numerous aspects of human health. (http://www.naturalnews.com/031317_fluoride_iodine.html)

All of this emerging research, of course, is what prompted the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to adjust its recommendation for optimal fluoride levels in public water supplies (http://www.naturalnews.com/030952_CDC_fluoride.html).

There simply is no way for so-called health experts and conventional dentists to legitimately continue denying that fluoride exposure is toxic, particularly for the youngest members of society.

Why, then, are cities like Portland, Oregon, which have long refused to jump on the fluoridation bandwagon, now suddenly considering adding fluoride to their water supplies? (http://www.naturalnews.com)

This is essentially the same question being asked by Fox News Dr. Ablow, who admits that, based on all the available data, it makes no scientific sense to deliver fluoride chemicals via the water supply, if at all.

You can read Dr. Ablow’s write-up here: http://www.foxnews.com

Oppose fluoridation of Portland’s water supply on September 6

Concerning Portland’s proposed addition of fluoride to the public water supply, health freedom advocates and those opposed to forcibly mass-medicating Portland residents with fluoride toxins can attend, and even speak at, an open hearing on September 6 at 2:00 pm at Portland City Hall.

The hearing will take place on thesecond floor of the building in the Council Chambers, which is located at 1221 SW 4th Ave. in Portland.

The official City Council vote on whether or not to fluoridate will reportedly take place on September 12.

To learn more, and to contact the Portland City Council to express vehement opposition to water fluoridation, visit: http://www.portlandonline.com/index.cfm?c=28533

Sources for this article include :









 The Diaspora Jewish community’s refusal to hear about atrocities committed by Israel

(Australian papers cover atrocities documented by Israeli soldiers group, but Aussie Jewish orgs blindly deny the reports)




by  on September 4, 2012

Fresh news about the Diaspora Jewish community’s refusal to hear about atrocities committed by Israel, let alone act on them, even as the wider community seems to be opening its eyes. 

Last week the Israeli soldiers’ group Breaking the Silence released a staggering report on the abuse, dehumanization, and shootings of Palestinian children by the Israeli army.

The report demonstrates that Israeli soldiers cross moral red lines without concern because they know they will never be punished for destroying Palestinians’ human rights.

Sadly, the report has gotten scarcely any attention in the US media. But it has been covered in Europe and Australia.

Two leading Australian papers published a big story on the report: The Age and the Sydney Morning Herald.

Antony Loewenstein has a post up on the matter, chronicling the angry response by Jewish groups to the news:

The Aus­tralian Jew­ish News was out­raged, pro­vid­ing a space for Zion­ist spokes­peo­ple to damn all the al­le­ga­tions:

“ Another Israel-bashing headline”, “a flagrantly one-sided piece” and “ threadbare and unsubstantiated ­allegations”

A state­ment was re­leased by Danny Lamm, Pres­i­dent of the Ex­ec­u­tive Coun­cil of Aus­tralian Jewry:

“How sad it is that once-great broad­sheets like the Syd­ney Morn­ing Her­ald and The Age have been re­duced to fea­tur­ing crude pro­pa­ganda on their front page.

Loewenstein notes that the bash was then joined by the head of the Israel lobby in Australia, Colin Ruben­stein, and a Jewish Labor MP named Michael Danby, who sought to leverage financial pressure on the newspapers:

Michael Danby told J-Wire: “I felt The Age cov­er­age was worse than the Syd­ney Morn­ing Her­ald’s as their head­line was more bi­ased and the graph­ics used were larger and more emo­tive.”

Speaking at the opening in Melbourne of the Is­raeli Film Fes­ti­val, Danby said: “I was not surprised to see the Fair­fax share price plum­met­ing. On days when hun­dreds of civil­ians were being killed in Syria, The Age and the Sydney Morn­ing Her­ald were re­hash­ing unverified re­hashed propaganda against Israel.”

He ap­pealed to Greg Hay­wood, the chair­man of Fair­fax to ex­plain why his chain gave such promi­nence to this story.

Breaking the Silence responded to the Australian critics with a defiant statement  ot its own.

The soldiers group asserted that its witnesses are telling the truth and it took jabs at armchair Diaspora Jews:

While the question of whether and to what degree Diaspora Jews should advocate their views on internal Israeli affairs is an open one, beating on Israelis of other political convictions is not.

 Lamm’s armchair Zionism pontificating from afar, while true Israelis put their lives on the line, imposes certain restraints on his engagement.

Loewenstein– who is the editor of a new volume of essays, After Zionism, to which I am also a contributor– explains the larger context of the controversy: 

The re­sponses by the Jew­ish establishment are noth­ing short of mean­ing­less in­tol­er­ance. And para­noia.

Increasingly  the reality of Is­raeli crimes are entering the mainstream and all they can do is bleat about propaganda and Is­raeli morality.

Fewer and fewer peo­ple believe this in 2012….

I thought this would be the end of the story but then this week I re­ceived an email (I’ve pub­lished it all below, reproving any rel­e­vant names) that reveals attempts by the sup­pos­edly more lib­eral wing of the Jew­ish com­mu­nity to en­cour­age peo­ple not to at­tend Is­rael/Pales­tine re­lated talks in Aus­tralia be­cause their minds must be cor­rupted.

Or some­thing. It reeks of big­otry and fear…. Zion­ism it­self is the problem here.

Here’s the beginning of the email Loewenstein published, from the liberal Zionist group Habonim Dror.

It characterizes Breaking the Silence as “sim­plis­tic and nar­row.”

Staggering denial– though note that, yes, another Jewish group was sponsoring Breaking the Silence in Australia:

———- For­warded mes­sage ———-
From: Daniel Crook 
Date: Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 2:20 PM
Sub­ject: [mel­bogs] Please Read {01}

Tomorrow night Hashy are hosting an event where the au­di­ence will hear from two speakers, one of the speakers is Micha Kurz, who is the co-founder of a NGO in Is­rael called ‘ Breaking the Silence’.

Hearing this came at quite a shock to me and I want to highly encourage anyone thinking of going to read this email before you go and show your support.

‘ Breaking the Silence  are highly crit­i­cised for being an anti-Zion­ist and anti-Is­rael or­gan­i­sa­tion, and are also crit­i­cised for being left wing extremists…

Anti Israel sentiment is growing throughout the world, as we see on our own universities campuses, and ‘ Breaking the Silence’ are po­ten­tially fueling a lot of this opin­ion.

‘ Breaking the Silence’ rely on the use of very ex­treme examples, including in­ter­views, testimonies and imag­ing, to show and un­cover what they term the shock­ing re­al­i­ties of Is­rael and the IDF.

They are highly crit­i­cised for pro­vid­ing a non-Zion­ist and highly over-simplistic view of the is­sues at hand and pre­sent a pic­ture of IDF ac­tions against Pales­tini­ans that is com­pletely re­moved from and ig­nores the larger Is­rael-Pales­tin­ian con­flict, which as a re­sult adds in a se­ri­ous way to the world wide anti-Is­rael sen­ti­ment that af­fects our lives as Zion­ists in a se­ri­ous way.

In short, the ex­am­ples that they use to ful­fil their mis­sion are very ex­treme and are taken out of con­text, they crit­i­cise the IDF and the Is­raeli gov­ern­ment with a very one-sided agenda, and also in­clude no pro­duc­tive stance about a more pos­i­tive di­rec­tion for Is­raeli so­ci­ety.


About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.








 Israeli Official: Obama ‘Will Make Netanyahu Pay’ If Reelected

 Many Israeli officials aren’t taking the Obama administration’s signals very well




From AntiWar.com

by John Glaser, September 01, 2012

Some Israeli security officials are trying to downplay the Pentagon’s decision to significantly scale back its participation in a US-Israeli military exercise, even though it was pretty clearly meant as a signal that Washington doesn’t support Israel’s march to war with Iran.

“Israel has no idea why the Americans decided to reduce the number of troops it will send to the drill,” one security official told the Jerusalem Post.

“The ties between the US and Israeli armies are strong, and we would have known if the reduction had something to do with any tensions between Jerusalem and Washington.”

The exercise, scheduled to begin in September, will include only about 1,200 US troops, as opposed to the initially planned 5,000.

Other Israelis clearly see the move for what it is.

 “Basically what the Americans are saying is, ‘We don’t trust you,’ another senior Israeli military official told Time magazine.

“I think they don’t want to insinuate that they are preparing something together with the Israelis against Iran – that’s the message,” says Israeli analyst Efraim Inbar.

A rift has been growing between the administrations of Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu over whether to launch an unprovoked war of choice against Iran for a nuclear weapons program it doesn’t even have.

“The US elections are in two months, and there is no doubt that President Barack Obama, if he is reelected, will make Netanyahu pay for his behavior,” said an Israeli security cabinet member. “It will not pass quietly.”

Last 5 posts by John Glaser :








(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777



Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: