DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

REAL NEWS Sept 09 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on September 8, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : September 09, 2012

=================================================================================================

BBC Now Admits Al Qaeda Never Existed

 

 

From Alexander Higgins Blog

 Posted by  – September 7, 2012 

A BBC documentary on Al Qaeda admits the Bin Laden’s Organization never existed. Instead the US invented it out of thin air to fabricate criminal charges.

http://alciaduh.blogspot.ca/

http://www.globalresearch.ca/unraveling-the-myth-of-al-qaida/

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/09/the-al-qaeda-myth/244857/

See also:

CIA Bin Laden Chief: ‘US Fighting An Enemy That Doesn’t Exist’

US Creating Enemies Through Its Foreign Policy

Former CIA Bin Laden Chief exposes the lies behind government claims that terrorists are attacking the US because they hate our freedom.

Former CIA agent Michael Scheuer, who was once in charge of hunting Bin Laden, debunks US government propaganda that “Al Qaeda” and “Islamist” terrorists are waging a war against America because they hate our freedom and they hate our way of life.

He explains how the US is fighting an enemy that does not exist.

Read Entire Article

In reality, what the western media refers to as Al Qaeda is nothing more than a Salafi Jihadists.

Salafists Islam is the version of Islam pre-dominate in Saudi Arabia and Qatar and the government of Saudi Arabia actually recruits Islamic extremists from their schools to wage Salafi Jihad against other Sunni and Shiite Muslims.

The United States doesn’t want you to know this because Saudi Arabia’s jihadists are used as a proxy mercenary army to conduct covert operations for the US Government.

For example, they were used to overthrow the Libya government and are actively working to overthrow the Syria government.

For a complete history of Saudi Arabia’s Salafi Jihadists see: Saudi Arabia Paying UK Trained Terrorists Up To $3,000/Mo To Jihad Against Syria

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

FBI and DHS Preparing False Flag Attack Claim Domestic Terrorists Building IEDs

 

 

From Activist Post

September 07, 2012

Susanne Posel, Contributor
Activist Post

On September 27th, in Springfield, Illinois, the Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) will conduct apresentation on improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

This demonstration is an extension of the FBI’s National Improvised Explosive Familiarization (NIEF) initiative “designed to raise awareness of the use of common chemicals to produce IEDs.”

The Illinois Fertilizer & Chemical Association (IFCA) are an organization that assists and represents “the crop production supply and service industry while promoting the sound stewardship and utilization of agricultural inputs.”

The NIEF was created in 2007.

They are “an intelligence-driven and a threat-focused national security and law enforcement organization” that becomes involved with local and state law enforcement with regard to terrorist and intelligence threats.

Just last month, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) requested 700 pounds of high density ammonium nitrate and 700 pounds of A-5 Flake RDX explosives.

These ingredients are known to be very high powered explosives.

The DHS was given oversight of procurement of ammonium nitrate after Congress requested they “regulate the sale and transfer of ammonium nitrate by an ammonium nitrate facility…to prevent the misappropriation or use of ammonium nitrate in an act of terrorism.”

The Ammonium Nitrate Security Program focuses on preventing a terrorist attack by use of ammonium nitrate in a home-made bomb by requiring that its sale and those that purchase it be registered with the DHS.

Purchasers are screened against the Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB).

Meanwhile, the DHS and FBI are warning about a possible false flag attacks using improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and “anarchists”.

Mainstream media reported that the “FBI and DHS assess with high confidence anarchist extremists will target… infrastructure in Tampa and Charlotte, with potentially significant impacts on public safety and transportation.”

Domestic terrorists, according to the DHS, are more of a threat to American safety than foreign terrorist organizations.

This harkens to the 2009 report DHS published for the Obama administration called Rightwing Extremism that stated domestic extremists, particularly white supremacists, were proposed to be the newest and most dangerous threat to the US since al-Qaeda.

While admitting that the agency had no definitive proof that “domestic rightwing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, [however] rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues.

The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.”

The FBI warned that anarchists would throw eggs and Molotov cocktails at the RNC convention and are still decrying extremists will attack the DNC in order to disrupt the proceedings.

The FBI claims that “given the historical precedence and recent arrests, we assess anarchist extremists will likely continue to exploit lawful protests to facilitate violent criminal activity at events like the upcoming political conventions.”

The DHS are also educating police departments on terrorist IED threats with the assistance of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCC).

The DHS claims that international bombings will be carried out on US soil and that the agency will develop partnerships with local and state law enforcement to prevent this from happening.

Funded by the DHS, at the University of Rhode Island, Jimmie Carol Oxley, chemist and professor, works with the DHS on projects with her students to analyze IEDs from manufacturing to various “terrorist scenarios”  that these diverse explosives could be used for.

Oxley has worked with many governmental agencies, such as the FBI, NSF, and National Academy of Sciences (NAS), National Research Council (NRC);

as well as written over 80 papers on “energetic materials (explosives, propellants, pyrotechnics). She has worked on law enforcement issues [with the FBI simulating the World Trade Center bombing (1993), with FEL examining large fertilizer bombs, and with ATF studying the behavior of pipe bombs]; however, her main research interest is hazard analysis of energetic materials.”

On a 2,200 acre site, Oxley and her students take IEDs constructed in the lab and detonate them to “see what happens.”

They use chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide to study how chemical additives can reduce or exacerbate the effects of a home-made bomb.

Most of Oxley’s students go on to work for the DHS specializing in criminal and terrorist investigations.

In May of 2012, the Global Campaign Against Improvised Explosive Devices (GCAIED) wrote a letter to Obama with the signatures of 23 members of Capitol Hill to bring “consensus” against the threat of IEDs.

With intelligence gathered by the National Counterterrorism Center’s Worldwide Incident Tracking System, there is a doubling of IEDs being manufactured annually by civilians.

The GCAIED claims that IEDs will be used to attack civilian populations with the intention to disrupt daily routines, healthcare and the November elections.

The connection to IEDs then turns toward the US veterans who may become violent and dangerous because of prolonged exposure to battlefield conditions combined with being diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Recently,Obama signed an executive order (EO) entitled, “Improving Access to Mental Health Services for Veterans, Service Members, and Military Families” wherein the Department of Defense is given control over the evaluation of the mental health of our returning service men and women by providing US government controlled “effective mental health services for veterans, service members, and their families.”

Obama demands that the VA and the DoD collaborate to provide proactive measures and a psychiatric pre-screen of returning service men and women to prevent erratic behavior.

The DoD will “review all existing mental health and substance abuse prevention, education and outreach programs” within the military services and access their effectiveness.

In the Obama administration report “Strengthening Our Military Families” written in 2011, the direction of the document points to identifying all veteran’s potential to become mentally incapacitated due to some psychiatric disorder which would cause them to become violent, depressed, aggressive and inevitably dangerous to society.

While the DHS and FBI are preparing to enact a false flag attack here in the US, the Obama administration is setting up the means to have every US veteran committed to a government-controlled mental hospital as a form of indefinite detention.

Once deemed insane, these men and women will not only have their arms taken, but their freedom restricted.

This tactic was enacted by other historical dictators from Mao in China to Hitler in Nazi-controlled Germany.

We are witnessing the Fascist takeover of our nation through the actions of the current puppet Barack Obama.

They are preparing for martial law and the complete lockdown of our country.

This first of many steps toward our decent into Totalitarianism is being played out in the demonetization of our US veterans, while simultaneously witnessing the DHS and FBI using propaganda concerning IEDs when it is the US government that is amassing 1400 pounds worth of ingredients to manufacture a fertilizer bomb.

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism.

Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Withdraw from WTO and Repeal NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA

 

 

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on September 7, 2012 by Admin

The Constitution of the United States of America established our nation as an independent Democratic Republic controlled by the people.

The Constitution established the laws and principles that bind us together as a free and independent nation; and

Our Constitution established that Congress, and only Congress has the power to negotiate trade with foreign countries; and,

In confirmation, Article 1, section 8 of the U.S. Constitution clearly states: “Congress shall have the Power to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes”; and

As a member of the WTO, the United States must conform to the rules and regulations of a foreign multi-lateral agency called the World Trade Organization; and

As a member of the WTO, Congress has illegally forfeited the power, (granted only to Congress by our constitution), to regulate U.S. commerce to a foreign power called the WTO.

Moreover, there is no provision in the Constitution that gives Congress the authority to pass the power to regulate, control, or govern U.S. commerce to a foreign nation, government, body, or agency like the World Trade Organization.

In addition, the President does not have the Constitutional power to negotiate trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, or the Central American Free Trade Agreement, as trade negotiation is the sole domain of the Congress of the United States according to our Constitution, Article 1, section 8.

Moreover, We the People of the United States of America believe that our Constitution is the law of the land and membership in the WTO violates Article 1, section 8 of our constitution; and is therefore unconstitutional and illegal.

Furthermore, We the People believe that NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA both undermine our economy, our security, and the sovereignty of our great nation; and

WHEREAS, U.S. trade deficits with China, Mexico, and Canada have increased significantly since the implementation of NAFTA and GATT, and that undermines our economy, sovereignty, and our independence as a nation; and

WHEREAS, NAFTA has served as a conduit for smuggling illegal aliens, illegal drugs, and terrorists into this country; and

WHEREAS, We the People, under our constitution, are against turning over our economy, our security, our independence, and our sovereignty to a foreign body; and

WHEREAS, we concede to the fact that the WTO, GATT, NAFTA, and CAFTA undermine our economy, our security, our independence, and our national sovereignty; and

WHEREAS, we believe that Americans, as a people, have the right to keep the fruits of their labor, and as a sovereign independent nation, we owe nothing to foreign countries, groups, or agencies; and

WHEREAS, we believe in upholding the Constitution of the United States of America as the supreme law of the land; and

WHEREAS, the Constitution grants Congress, and Congress alone, the authority to regulate commerce; and

WHEREAS, Congress does not have Constitutional authority to cede the control of international trade or commerce to the WTO or any other foreign government, or international body or agency; and

WHEREAS, our membership in the WTO violates Article 1, section 8, of
the Constitution of the United States of America and is therefore illegal; and

WHEREAS, the President nor Congress can not legally sign any treaty that purports to cede the authority to control U.S. commerce, trade or tariffs to a foreign body; therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED, that we the People endorse the following constitutional principles:

1. The United States government including Congress does not have the power under the Constitution of the United States of America to cede the regulation or the control of commerce to a foreign body, government, or agency.

2. Under our constitution, the United States of America does not have to answer to any governing body outside the United States for its trade regulations or trade policy.

3. Ceding authority over U.S. trade and commerce to a foreign body, government, or agency is illegal and in direct violation of Article 1, section 8, of the Constitution of the United States of America.

4. NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA exported our jobs and our properity to foreign countries and inported illegal aliens, drugs, and terrorists.

THEREFORE, We the People petition congress to honor our Constitution and their pledge to uphold and defend our Constitution by acting immediately to withdraw the United States of America from the World Trade Organization, and by repealing NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA which are all unfair and unlawful trade agreements that undetmine our economy and our sovereignty.

Sign Petition Here

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

The One Party Zionist System Revealed at DNC

 

 

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on September 7, 2012 by Henry Shivley

Well it would seem those still trapped in the false left paradigm have just discovered what those still trapped in the false right paradigm did last week, and that is that these two political parties are actually one and the same. 

When it comes down to brass tacks, the Israelis control our government, not the American people.

The fact is, we out here among the great unwashed and disenfranchised have discovered who the Zionists are and that the Christian Zionists in this country are in cahoots with the Zionist cabal in Israel and have been running our government for the past 50 years to the benefit of the Israelis and the detriment of the people of the US.

Make no mistake.  These Christian Zionists did not sell out cheap as they have been rewarded quite handsomely for their treason. 

The fact is their duplicity is what put them into the ranks of the elite.

You see this is why you see total agreement amongst those in both the false left and the false right on every issue concerning Israel. 

If either phony party were to waver in the slightest and cause there to be a debate, the pent up resentment against the dual citizen Israeli-Americans exercising control in our government would spew forth and the truth as to what we Americans as individuals think about being the goyim of the Zionists might very well cause an uprising.

The Jews in this country make up a mere 1.7% of our population, yet they enjoy the highest standard of living available. 

In reality this is what happened in Germany. 

All Adolf Hitler had to do was tell the German people, “Hey wake up morons, your children are starving in the streets while these Jews are living fat on your resources that they have gained control over through duplicity and manipulation.”

There is a reason that the Jews have been booted from every civilized nation around the world at one time or another throughout history. 

They are parasites that thrive on the suffering of their hosts.  Their thirst for wealth and power can never be quenched and they have never stopped as a result of their own initiative.

The Zionists literally consider all other human beings as soulless animals, there for them to use and consume for their pleasure at their leisure. 

This Zionist oppression is not going to stop until we stop it.

God bless the Republic, death to the international corporate mafia, we shall prevail.

===================================

Reality Check: DNC Runs Over Delegates With Scripted Platform Vote

Published on Sep 6, 2012 by 

Ben Swann Reality Check looks at how the DNC scripted a vote to change the party’s platform one week after the Republican leadership did the same thing at the RNC.

=============================================

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

From our WTF? files : California passes resolution defining criticism of Israel as anti-semitism

=====================================

{XANIEL’S NOTE : IS EVERY DAMN MEMBER OF U.S. POLITICS A F#CKING ISRAELI ZIONIST ?

THESE POLITICIANS OUR SHOWING THEIR LOYALTY TO A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT, NOT THE U.S.A.

THEY ARE ENSLAVING THE U.S. CITIZENS FOR ISRAEL AND ISRAELI INTERESTS, WITH NO HELP FOR OUR OWN.

AS FAR AS I’M CONCERNED ISRAEL CAN BURN IN HELL BEFORE I’D DO ANYTHING FOR THEM OVER OUR OWN INTERESTS ! 

AMERICA FIRST, ALL OTHERS SECOND !

YOU WANT TO CALL THAT ANTI-SEMITISM ?

SO BE IT, YOU TREASONOUS BASTARDS !!

I EQUALLY THINK THAT IF YOU LOVE ISRAEL AND THEIR INTERESTS OVER YOUR OWN PEOPLE AND OUR INTERESTS,

MOVE YOUR TREASONOUS ASSES OVER THERE,

BECAUSE NOT A DAMN ONE OF YOU QUALIFIES AS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN ANY LONGER !

AND BEFORE ANY ONE YELLS, ” You Hate Jews !”

BULLSHIT !!

THIS IS NOT ABOUT JEWS, IT’S ABOUT ZIONISM IN ALL IT’S UGLY FORMS AND IT NEEDS TO BE STOPPED NOW!

I, MYSELF, AM IRISH/AMERICAN INDIAN,

I DON’T SEE YOU TRAITORS COMING UP WITH LAWS TO PROTECT ME AND MY PEOPLE FROM CRITICISM OF OURS.} ~~Xaniel777

=====================================

{ “IF ISRAEL GETS IT’S WAY, WE’LL SOON BE THE UNTIED STATES OF ZIONIST ISRAEL…if we aren’t already ” }~~~Xaniel777

===========================

 From Anti-Neocons

By Tom Carter / Global Research, September 04, 2012

Last month, the California State Assembly passed a resolution urging state educational institutions to more aggressively crack down on criticism of the State of Israel on campuses, which the resolution defines as

The anti-democratic resolution is the latest step in the broader campaign to stifle and suppress dissent on California’s increasingly volatile campuses.

The California State Assembly is the lower house of the state legislature, consisting of 80 members.

The resolution—H.R. 35: “Relative to anti-Semitism”—was passed by a vote of 66 to 80, including a majority of both Republicans and Democrats in the Assembly.

The resolution was drafted by Republican Linda Halderman and passed without public discussion.

The vote on the resolution came when most students were between semesters and away from their campuses.

The resolution (available here) uses the classic trick employed by defenders of Israel’s Zionist regime: lumping together any criticism of the Israeli state’s policies or of the US government’s support for them with racist attacks on Jews.

On the one hand, the resolution denounces “swastikas and other anti-Semitic graffiti in residential halls, public areas on campus, and Hillel houses,” and denounces those who accuse “the Jewish people, or Israel, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.”

On the other hand, the bulk of the resolution is dedicated to defining criticism of the state of Israel as “anti-Semitism.”

It lists the following as examples of “anti-Semitism”:

• “language or behavior [that] demonizes and delegitimizes Israel;”

“speakers, films, and exhibits” that indicate that “Israel is guilty of heinous crimes against humanity such as ethnic cleansing and genocide;”

• describing Israel as a “racist” or “apartheid” state;

• “student-and faculty-sponsored boycott, divestment, and sanction campaigns against Israel;”

• “denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination;”

• “applying double standards by requiring of Israel a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation;” and

• “actions of student groups that encourage support for terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Hezbollah.”

This list makes clear that the accusations of anti-Semitism are a red herring, employed to attack students’ democratic rights and stifle dissent.

The resolution recalls the smear campaign against German author Günter Grass and his poem “What Must Be Said” earlier this year.

Defending the poem, the World Socialist Web Site explained: “Anti-Semitism is the term used to describe racist hatred aimed at the oppression and persecution of Jews—and in the case of the Third Reich, the extermination of Jews.

Grass’s criticisms of the war policy of the Netanyahu government are not directed against Jews, nor against Jews in Israel.

His overwhelming concern is the well-being of both the Jewish population in Israel and the Iranian people.

This is in stark contrast to the Israeli government.

“The Israeli regime does not represent the interests of the Jewish population, but rather a tiny rich and corrupt clique that has always worked closely with American imperialism.” (See Defend Günter Grass!)

The aggressive narrowness of the resolution’s definition of acceptable political discussion, combined with its broad definition of anti-Semitism, prompted the University of California to distance itself from the resolution, though without rejecting or denouncing it.

“We think it’s problematic because of First Amendment concerns,” UC spokesman Steve Montiel told the San Francisco Chronicle last week.

The resolution does clearly implicate the First Amendment, which protects not only criticism of the state of Israel, but generally protects anti-Semitic hate speech as well.

Moreover, it must also be said that the State of Israel is, as a matter of fact, guilty of crimes against humanity.

To cite only a more recent example, the 574-page UN Goldstone Report published in 2010 found that the State of Israel had deliberately targeted civilians and civilian infrastructure in Gaza during the 2008-2009 “Operation Cast Lead.”

The invasion of Gaza saw 1,400 Palestinians killed compared with 13 Israelis killed. More than 21,000 buildings, factories, and apartments were damaged or destroyed.

Under California H.R. 35, it appears that the Goldstone report is now to be considered “anti-Semitic.”

The resolution also contains a denunciation of “suppression and disruption of free speech that presents Israel’s point of view.”

This appears to be a reference to the “Irvine 11” incident last year, in which 11 students shouted down Israeli ambassador Michael Oren during his speech at the University of California at Irvine.

The 11 students shouted, “Michael Oren, you’re a war criminal,” and “You, sir, are an accomplice to genocide.”

These students were later arrested, charged, and convicted of the crimes of “conspiracy” and violating Oren’s rights. (See University of California students convicted for protesting Israeli ambassador’s speech.)

The resolution goes on to state that the “Assembly recognizes recent actions by officials of public post secondary educational institutions in California [e.g., the prosecutions of the Irvine 11] and calls upon those institutions to increase their efforts to swiftly and unequivocally condemn acts of anti-Semitism on their campuses and to utilize existing resources . . . to help guide campus discussion about, and promote, as appropriate, educational programs for combating anti-Semitism on their campuses.”

On California’s campuses, as on campuses and workplaces internationally, explosive class antagonisms are increasingly apparent.

Massive tuition hikes year after year coupled with job losses and skyrocketing youth unemployment present an entire generation of young people with an increasingly impossible situation.

State authorities in California, which is controlled by the Democratic Party, have watched the large campus protests that took place across state campuses over the past two years with hostility, consternation, and fear.

Over the past year, at the behest of Democratic Party officials, demonstrating students across the state have been attacked by paramilitary police squads armed with batons, tear gas, and flash grenades, with hundreds of students arrested and jailed.

The world’s attention was captured when students peacefully protesting tuition hikes at UC Davis were pepper sprayed by police in cold blood.

In the face of increasing tensions and protests, state authorities are moving to clamp down on the campuses, intervening to “guide campus discussion” and criminalize criticism of both domestic and foreign policy.

Under the guise of criticizing “anti-Semitism” the state government signaling that the persecution of student protesters will be tolerated or welcomed.

The resolution concludes that “strong leadership from the top remains an important priority so that no administrator, faculty, or student group can be in any doubt that anti-Semitic activity will not be tolerated in the classroom or on campus, and that no public resources will be allowed to be used for anti-Semitic or any intolerant agitation.”

http://www.globalresearch.ca/california-passes-resolution-defining-criticism-of-israel-as-anti-semitism/

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Everything Is Illegal In America (Full Version)

 

 

From Underground Documentaries

In this TV special John Stossel asks, “Is everything illegal in America?”

From kids’ lemonade stands to food cooperatives to filming in public, what CAN we do in America without breaking the law? 

And when police infringe upon your rights, why are THEY never punished?

 

===========================

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

Advertisements

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: