DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

REAL NEWS Sept 13 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on September 12, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : September 13, 2012

=================================================================================================

END THE FED! Nationwide protest September 22nd

 

Published on Jul 30, 2012 by 

 

 

http://www.facebook.com/events/270846059689581/

 

 

===============================================================================================

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Four Days to Stop a Corporate Death Star

 

 

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on September 12, 2012 by Angel – NYC

Details are leaking of a top-secret, global corporate power grab of breathtaking scope – attacking everything from a free Internet to health and environmentalregulations, and we have just 4 days to stop it.

Big business has a new plan to fatten their pockets: a giant global pact, with an international tribunal to enforce it, that is kept top secret for years (even from our lawmakers!) and then brought down like a Death Star on our democracies. 

Big Tobacco, Big Oil, Big Pharma, Walmart and almost 600 other corporate lobbyists are all in on the draft – including limits on smoking laws, affordable medicines and free speech on the Net.

The latest round of negotiations ends in just 4 days – but outcries in each of our countries could shake the confidence of negotiators and scuttle the talks forever.

Let’s get to a million against the global corporate takeover. Sign below and forward widely.

Avaaz will project our petition counter on the walls of the conference so negotiators can see the opposition to their plan exploding in real time:

Sign the Petition Here

The deal, called the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), is written to protect investorsfrom government regulation, even if that regulation is passed in the public interest.

 Leaked versions suggest the TPP would undermine protections for air and water safety and reintroduce measures from the US Internet freedom attack as well as steamrolling efforts to produce generic affordable medicines.

Worse still, lawmakers who fail to conform to the TPP’s rules face sanctions in an international tribunal — a place where corporations can sue us for deals previous governments signed in secret!

Negotiators say this is just a trade agreement, written to facilitate investment and profit for all.

But the leaked draft imposes so many limits on citizen protections, it’s clear this “trade” agreement is skewed to put corporate profit above people’s needs — that’s not surprising since it’s been drafted in secret with almost 600 corporate lobbyists.

But there is hope: Australia is bucking against the international tribunal system, and New Zealand is objecting to the takeover of its medicine-pricing protections that keep drugs affordable. 

Massive public opposition, casting doubt over each country’s ability to sell TPP at home, could derail the talks for good.

Sign the petition now, and forward widely — the delegates and lobbyists are watching the wave of opposition grow in real time:

Sign the Petition Here

US Senator, Elizabeth Warren in a recent speech said: “Corporations are not people. People have hearts, they have kids, they get jobs, they get sick, they cry, they dance. They live, they love, and they die. And that matters, because we don’t run this country for corporations, we run it for people.”

Let’s reach one million to stop the corporate takeover of our governments.

With hope,

Iain, Pedro, Laura, Ari, Emma, Lisa, Luca, Ricken and the whole Avaaz team

MORE INFORMATION :

The Nation: “NAFTA on Steroids”
http://www.thenation.com/article/168627/nafta-steroids

The Guardian: “The Pacific free trade deal that’s anything but free”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/27/pacific-free-trade-deal

Huffington Post: “Leak Cracks Open Trans-Pacific Partnership Scandal”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-fletcher/leak-cracks-open-transpac_b_1594675.html

Reuters: “Lawmakers press for open Trans-Pacific trade talks”
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/27/us-usa-congress-trade-idUSBRE85Q1MK20120627

TechDirt: “Hollywood Gets To Party With TPP Negotiators; Public Interest Groups Get Thrown Out Of Hotel”
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120131/23161417605/hollywood-gets-to-party-with-tpp-negotiators-public-interest-groups-get-thrown-out-hotel.shtml

Electronic Frontier Foundation: “Background and analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement”
https://www.eff.org/issues/tpp

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The elite have made the decision to exterminate the useless eaters

Will Humanity Survive The Singularity?

 

Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Tuesday, September 11, 2012

As the elite steers technological progress towards the singularity – man merging with machine – the majority of humans will cease to have a purpose or even be able to function in a brave new world run by a scientific dictatorship, which is why the ruling classes have formally reached the decision to begin a ruthless program of extermination.

Will Humanity Survive The Singularity? bravenewworld heads

As Sun Microsystems’ Bill Joy explained in an April 2000 Wired Magazine piece entitled Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us, the elite sees the mass of humanity as superfluous.

In the coming decades, all the functions performed by what can loosely be termed the lower classes will all be carried out by robots.

“Due to improved techniques the elite will have greater control over the masses; and because human work will no longer be necessary the masses will be superfluous, a useless burden on the system.

If the elite is ruthless they may simply decide to exterminate the mass of humanity.

If they are humane they may use propaganda or other psychological or biological techniques to reduce the birth rate until the mass of humanity becomes extinct, leaving the world to the elite,” writes Joy.

The only other scenario is equally chilling, with Joy seeing the best possible outcome for humanity a Brave New World-style system where every human action and behavior is tightly regulated by a scientific dictatorship.

“If the elite consists of soft-hearted liberals, they may decide to play the role of good shepherds to the rest of the human race,” writes Joy.

“They will see to it that everyone’s physical needs are satisfied, that all children are raised under psychologically hygienic conditions, that everyone has a wholesome hobby to keep him busy, and that anyone who may become dissatisfied undergoes “treatment” to cure his “problem.”

Of course, life will be so purposeless that people will have to be biologically or psychologically engineered either to remove their need for the power process or make them “sublimate” their drive for power into some harmless hobby.

These engineered human beings may be happy in such a society, but they will most certainly not be free.

They will have been reduced to the status of domestic animals.”

Although they disguise this agenda behind environmental and social benevolence, the elite’s motivations for wanting the mass of people either downtrodden or eliminated are entirely selfish.

They want sole access to the life-extension technologies that will see man merge with machine and create a new superclass of humans.

The elite see themselves as the rightful heirs to the very control of human evolution – they literally want to play God with the future of the species, despite the fact that the elite itself is historically inbred, a process which is known to cause delusions of grandeur and insanity.

The decision has now been made to herd humanity inside compact prison cities and gradually shut off their resources by charging more for less.

This post-industrial revolution serves to drastically reduce living standards, creating a further gulf between the super-rich and the peasants and thereby facilitating the creation of a new master oligarchy.

The advancement of technology is not being used to empower humanity, but to enslave humanity.

This process is being overseen by a technocracy that simultaneously expresses its desire to see the human population reduced in large numbers.

The elite have been obsessed with eugenics and its modern day incarnation, population control, for well over 100 years and that goal of global population reduction is still in full force to this day.

In 2009, the London Times reported on a “secret billionaire club” meeting which took place in New York and was attended by the likes of David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Bill Gates and others.

The meeting was focused around “how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population”.

We questioned establishment media spin which portrayed the attendees as kind-hearted and concerned philanthropists by pointing out that Ted Turner has publicly advocated shocking population reduction programs that would cull the human population by a staggering 95%.

He has also called for a Communist-style one child policy to be mandated by governments in the west.

In China, the one child policy is enforced by means of taxes on each subsequent child, allied to an intimidation program which includes secret police and “family planning” authorities kidnapping pregnant women from their homes and performing forced abortions.

Of course, Turner completely fails to follow his own rules on how everyone else should live their lives, having five children and owning no less than 2 million acres of land.

In the third world, Turner has contributed literally billions to population reduction, namely through United Nations programs, leading the way for the likes of Bill & Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet (Gates’ father has long been a leading board member of Planned Parenthood and a top eugenicist).

The notion that these elitists merely want to slow population growth in order to improve health is a complete misnomer.

Slowing the growth of the world’s population while also improving its health are two irreconcilable concepts to the elite.

Stabilizing world population is a natural byproduct of higher living standards, as has been proven by the stabilization of the white population in the west.

Elitists like David Rockefeller have no interest in “slowing the growth of world population” by natural methods, their agenda is firmly rooted in the pseudo-science of eugenics, which is all about “culling” the surplus population via draconian methods.

David Rockefeller’s legacy is not derived from a well-meaning “philanthropic” urge to improve health in third world countries, it is born out of a Malthusian drive to eliminate the poor and those deemed racially inferior, using the justification of social Darwinism.

As is documented in Alex Jones’ seminal film Endgame, Rockefeller’s father, John D. Rockefeller, exported eugenics to Germany from its origins in Britain by bankrolling the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute which later would form a central pillar in the Third Reich’s ideology of the Nazi super race.

After the fall of the Nazis, top German eugenicists were protected by the allies as the victorious parties fought over who would enjoy their “expertise” in the post-war world.

In the latter half of the 20th century, eugenics merely changed its face to become known as “population control”.

This was crystallized in National Security Study Memorandum 200, a 1974 geopolitical strategy document prepared by Rockefeller’s intimate friend and fellow Bilderberg member Henry Kissinger, which targeted thirteen countries for massive population reduction by means of creating food scarcity, sterilization and war.

The document, declassified in 1989, identified 13 countries that were of special interest to U.S. geopolitical objectives and outlined why population growth, and particularly that of young people who were seen as a revolutionary threat to U.S. corporations, was a potential roadblock to achieving these objectives.

The countries named were India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia.

The study outlined how civil disturbances affecting the “smooth flow of needed materials” would be less likely to occur “under conditions of slow or zero population growth.”

“Development of a worldwide political and popular commitment to population stabilization is fundamental to any effective strategy. This requires the support and commitment of key LDC leaders.

This will only take place if they clearly see the negative impact of unrestricted population growth and believe it is possible to deal with this question through governmental action,” states the document.

The document called for integrating “family planning” (otherwise known as abortion) with routine health services for the purposes of “curbing the numbers of LDC people,” (lesser-developed countries).

The report shockingly outlines how withholding food could be used as a means of punishment for lesser-developed countries who do not act to reduce their population, essentially using food as a weapon for a political agenda by creating mass starvation in under-developed countries.

“The allocation of scarce PL480 (food) resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production,” states the document.

Later in the document, the idea of enforcing “mandatory programs” by using food as “an instrument of national power” is presented.

The document states that the program will be administered through the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), thereby “avoiding the danger that some LDC leaders will see developed-country pressures for family planning as a form of economic or racial imperialism; this could well create a serious backlash.”

As Jean Guilfoyle writes, “NSSM 200 was a statement composed after the fact. During the late 1960s and early 1970s, the U.S. had worked diligently behind the scenes to advance the population-control agenda at the United Nations, contributing the initial funding of $1 million.

A Department of State telegram, dated July 1969, reported the support of John D. Rockefeller III, among others, for the appointment of Rafael Salas of the Philippines as senior officer to co-ordinate and administer the UN population program.

The administrator of the UN Development Program reported confidentially that he preferred someone such as Salas who had the “advantage of color, religion (Catholic) and conviction.”

A comprehensive outline of what is contained in the National Security Memorandum document can be read at http://www.theinterim.com/july98/20nssm.html

In the 21st century, the eugenics movement has changed its stripes once again, manifesting itself through the global carbon tax agenda and the notion that having too many children or enjoying a reasonably high standard of living is destroying the planet through global warming, creating the pretext for further regulation and control over every facet of our lives.

As we have tirelessly documented, the elite’s drive for population control is not based around a benign philanthropic urge to improve living standards, it is firmly routed in eugenics, racial hygiene and fascist thinking.

The London Times reports that the secret billionaire cabal, with its interest in population reduction, has been dubbed ‘The Good Club’ by insiders.

This couldn’t be further from the truth.

Anyone who takes the time to properly research the origins of the “population control” movement will come to understand that the Rockefeller-Turner-Gates agenda for drastic population reduction,

which is now clearly manifesting itself through real environmental crises like chemtrails, genetically modified food, tainted vaccines and other skyrocketing diseases such as cancer,

has its origins in the age-old malevolent elitist agenda to cull the human “chattel” as one would do to rodents or any other species deemed a nuisance by the central planning authorities.

In reality, it’s not that the “future doesn’t need us” as Bill Joy put it, but that the elite has decided they don’t need us.

This is why the ruling classes have embarked on a technocratic plan of domination and ultimately elimination.

This is also why humanity needs to regroup as a species and recognize the true threat to the survival of the race – the elite itself – because if that doesn’t happen we may not have a future to speak of at all.

In our next article we will look at how the technological singularity will manifest itself as robots take over the decision making process and humanity is forced to accept the terms of its enslavement by a ruthless technocracy or cease to exist altogether.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Was U.S. Ambassador Lynched? Media Caught Lying Again?

 

 

From Alexander Higgins Blog

Posted by  – September 12, 2012

Attack on U.S. Consulate illustrates disastrous outcome of Obama’s humanitarian intervention in Libya as photos indicate torture before the murder.

Earlier today the US ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens was killed by the same terrorist he helped put into power.

Following the initial reports  that he and 3 other Americans on his staff were murdered when terrorists fired Rocket Propelled Grenades on his vehicles the corporate media reported US officials were stating the attacks were planned beforehand.

Now both the official story about an RPG attack and hence claims that terrorist planned the attack beforehand are being brought into question.

The questions center around new evidence which appears to show that the Ambassador was in fact held captive and tortured by Libya militants prior to his death and then he was paraded on the streets after he was murdered.

More from Infowars:

By Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Despite initial reports suggesting he died in a rocket attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, photos appear to indicate that U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was killed by a lynch mob, illustrating the disastrous consequences of the Obama administration’s military intervention in Libya – arming some of the very same men who carried out today’s attack.

“The US ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, has been killed in a rocket attack in the eastern city of Benghazi along with three other embassy staff, the White House confirmed on Wednesday,” reports France 24.

However, images released in the hours after the attack show Stevens’ body being paraded around by a mob. The body appears to show signs of torture.

Subsequent reports speculated that Stevens’ car was attacked as he and the three other personnel attempted to escape from the Consulate.

The other embassy staff were shot while Stevens’ died of “suffocation,” suggesting he was lynched and physically attacked by the mob.

The incident is being portrayed by the establishment media as a reaction to a film produced in the United States that purportedly ridicules Islam’s Prophet Mohammed.

However, the wider issue of how the 2011 bombardment of Libya paved the way for gangs of militant Islamic extremists, once backed by NATO powers with heavy weapons, to fill the power vacuum left by Colonel Gaddafi, has been largely ignored.

Indeed, it’s a horrific irony that Hillary Clinton’s infamous gloating about Gaddafi’s execution – “We came, we saw, he died” – has now come full circle, with Stevens paying for such despicable arrogance with his life.

After NATO-backed insurgents with links to Al-Qaeda helped topple Colonel Gaddafi in Libya, they proudly flew the distinctive black Al-Qaeda flag over courthouses in Benghazi and other centers of power.

That same flag flew over the Consulate today after the U.S. flag was torn down and burned.

In the aftermath of last year’s “no fly zone,” which turned into an incessant bombardment almost overnight, Libya, once one of the richest countries in Africa, is now run by brutal armed gangs who have rounded up black people in huge numbers, subjecting them to torture, incarceration in concentration camps and execution.

A February 2012 report by Amnesty International found that Libya’s militias are “largely out of control” and that “Thousands of detainees are being held in various prisons across the country” and are being “tortured to death.”

The country’s NATO-installed rulers have proven themselves unwilling to prevent widespread abuse.

Libya’s oil resources have been carved up between NATO-aligned corporations while the country’s financial enslavement to global bankers is ensured with a fresh IMF loan and the end of their state-owned central banking system.

Despite the fact that Libya is in a state of hellish sectarian warfare and societal collapse, with armed thugs hostile to the west now in control of major power centers, the White House is intent on repeating the same disaster in Syria,funneling arms to rebelsthe majority of whom aren’t even Syrian, who are being led by Al-Qaeda terrorists.

Indeed, some of the very same militants responsible for the Libya debacle were airlifted into Syria with the aid of NATO powers as part of the effort to topple Bashar Al-Assad.

The assault on Libya was carried out with absolutely zero constitutional authorization.

In June last year, President Obama arrogantly expressed his hostility to the rule of law when he dismissed the need to get congressional authorization to commit the United States to a military intervention in Libya, churlishly dismissing criticism and remarking, “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question.”

Obama tried to legitimize his failure to obtain Congressional approval for military involvement by sending a letter to Speaker of the House John Boehner in which he said the military assault was “authorized by the United Nations (U.N.) Security Council.”

Today’s attack on the U.S. Consulate serves as another reminder that the military-industrial complex’s new paradigm of “humanitarian intervention” – a scam they hope to repeat in Syria – has nothing to do with humanitarianism in that it only results in more bloodshed and more instability.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.

Related Posts :

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Israel’s Mofaz says PM ‘meddling’ in US vote

 

 

Israeli  opposition leader Shaul Mofaz

From DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND.com

Source: Agence France Presse

AFP – Israel’s opposition leader on Wednesday accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of “meddling” in the US presidential election and harming Israel’s ties with Washington in a dispute over Iran’s nuclear programme. 

The remarks by opposition leader Shaul Mofaz came as Netanyahu and the White House locked horns over how to handle Iran’s nuclear programme, with Israel threatening unilateral military action against Tehran, despite American objections. 

Mofaz said Netanyahu’s pursuit of a very public dispute with President Barack Obama over Iran was an attempt to sway voters against the US leader, who faces a challenge from Republican rival Mitt Romney in the November ballot. 

“Israeli meddling in internal US affairs and turning the US administration from an ally to ‘an enemy’ has caused us severe damage,” Mofaz charged, at a session of the Israeli parliament, known as the Knesset.

Read more: http://www.france24.com/en/20120912-israels-mofaz-says-pm-meddling-us-vote 

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Israel, The Day After

 

 

From Veterans Today

By Gilad Atzmon – September 12, 2012

Last week, an interesting article by Daniel Gordis appeared on Tablemag.com.

Gordis, a committed Zionist intellectual, is concerned about the inevitable collapse of the Jewish state and its impact on world Jewry in general and American Jews in particular.

Although it’s reassuring that Zionist scholars are now realising that that the Jewish State is on its way out, even more importantly, Gordis’ article gives us a glimpse into contemporary Jewish identity politics, Jewish culture and Zionist collective psychosis.

And interestingly, Gordis reaffirms each and every critical argument I myself raise in my latest book The Wandering Who.

Gordis is tormented by polls that suggest that the centrality of Israel within Jewish American life is declining.

Apparently, a recent survey suggests that 50 percent of young Jewish Americans (35 years old and younger) would not see the destruction of Israel as a ‘personal tragedy’.

In his attempt to explain such a dramatic change in Jewish Diaspora Jewish attitude, Gordis refers to Peter Beinart’s take on the subject: that young American Jews feel safe, and unlike their parents, do not fear anti-Semitism.

Beinart is correct.

Western Jews are no longer anxious. On the contrary, contemporary Jewish political arrogance knows no limits.

AIPAC and similar Western Jewish lobbies have been openly pushing for interventionist wars for more than a decade and some influential Jews have been open in exploring different forms and aspects of Judeocentric domination of the media, banking, culture and politics.

In fact it seems that many Jews are not troubled at all by a possible rise of anti Semitism and are unconcerned with any possible consequences of their own actions.

To a certain extent this sense of Jewish omnipotence may be seen as a direct continuum of Israeli strength;

when young American Jews witness their American elected politicians dancing shamelessly to AIPAC’s Klezmatic noise,

naturally they are filled with a sense of invincible might and it is this that is the essence of contemporary Jewish collective power –

a power that can only be realised in connection with Israeli strength.

Pre Traumatic Stress Again

Gordis is there to shake Jewish Diaspora confidence by reintroducing the old tribal collective fear.

He writes:

“Theodor Herzl did what he did and wrote what he wrote because Jewish life in the Diaspora had become, to use Hobbes’ phrase, ‘poor, nasty, brutish, and short.’” 

According to Gordis, contemporary Jews are too self-possessed and feel far too safe. 

“What happened back then, they assert, could not happen today.” 

 But Gordis believes they are deluded. 

“American Jews’ confidence resembles that of the Jews of Cordoba—who were forcibly converted, burned alive at the stake, and summarily expelled in the Spanish Inquisition.” 

Similarly, he asserts that, “the Jews of Berlin in 1930 also believed they had found the ultimate enlightened home, that the dark days of Europe would never return. And in the space of but a few years, German Jewry was erased.”

 Here, Gordis conveys a clear message – in the light of a new potential Shoa “American Jewish life as it now exists would not survive the loss of Israel.”

In The Wandering Who I explore the impact of Pre-Traumatic Stress Disorder (Pre-TSD) and I refer in particular to that uniquely Jewish collective tendency to be culturally, spiritually and politically shaped by some phantasmic, imaginary, future, disastrous event.

Jewish politics is always formed by future trauma. Accordingly, Gordis message to his fellow Jews is clear.

It isn’t the Shoa of the past that should unite us, it is actually, the Shoa ahead that should reawaken our Zionist bond.

Gordis message to American Jews is clear.

A strong Israel together with AIPAC’s control of American foreign policy is good for the Jews and any alternative is a recipe for disaster.

“When some 400 mostly Orthodox rabbis marched on Washington in the October 1943, President Roosevelt simply refused to meet them and departed the White House via a rear door. There were no mass protests, no caravans of buses to Washington to demand help for their European kin.” 

 Nowadays, the situation has changed dramatically.

The presidency of the USA is a democratically elected position reserved for that candidate who has bought the trust of the Jewish Lobby.

“Jews today no longer think of themselves as a tiptoeing people,” says Gordis.

And why should they?

Thanks to Israel and its powerful lobby, they regard themselves as the most influential and powerful ethnic group on the planet.

In America, AIPAC dominates  foreign policy, in Britain 80% of leading party MPs are members of the powerful CFI (Conservative Friends of Israel) and in France CRIF runs the show.

Take it from Gordis a Zionist official mouthpiece; “Israel has changed the existential condition of Jews everywhere, even in America. Without the State of Israel, the self-confidence and sense of belonging that American Jews now take for granted would quickly disappear.” 

In short, Jews can run the show – but only as long as Israel is unbeatable.

And he’s not wrong. Like so many Zionists, Gordis is both honest and consistent – a quality I rarely find within the Jewish anti-Zionist discourse.

Gordis openly admits that we are dealing here with a clear paradox.

The sense of belonging and security that leads many American Jews to believe that they do not need the state of Israel is itself a product of that very same state of Israel.

That lethal arrogance that led Zionists such as Bernard Henri Levi, or Jewish Chronicle writer David Aaronovitch to advocate interventionist global wars should be seen as the outcome of a strong Jewish State – a state that quite literally gets away with murder.

Symbolic Identifier

In The Wandering Who I suggest that Israel operates as a key Jewish symbolic identifier so that Jews construct their identity in reference to their Jewish state.

This is not only true for Zionist Jews but is also the case for those so-called ‘anti Zionist Jews’ whose identity is inherently tied to their opposition to Zionism and Israel.  

The disappearance of Israel would leave their political identity stark naked.

Gordis detects a similar pattern amongst American liberal Jews. “Though many American Jews, especially the younger among them, now believe the loss of Israel would not be tragic, Israel continues to energize them in ways that no other issue does.” 

Gordis continues “Israel is not just a homeland to Israelis.

It is also a ‘state unto the Diaspora’; the state that, even from afar, secures the life and instils the passions of Jews all over the world.” 

This is true not only for Zionists, but also to those very few Jewish anti-Zionists who, by means of negation, ‘passionately’ cling to Israel.

Apocalypse Soon

Gordis seems to realise that, for Israel, the game is over, but he realises that this may also entail a collapse of Jewish power.

“The loss of Israel would fundamentally alter American Jewry.

It would arrest the revival of Jewish life now unfolding in parts of Europe.

And Israeli Jewry would be no more.

The end of Israel would, in short, end the Jewish people as we know it.”

The current ‘Jewish golden epoch’ is coming to its inevitable end.

Yet, the question that remains is whether our Zionist and Israeli leaders would let our planet survive the collapse of their latest Jewish empire? 

Following Netanyahu, Barak and AIPAC’s relentless push for Armageddon, and bearing in mind that collective suicidal narratives such as Samson and Masada are so precious within the Zionist and Israeli discourses, we should stay on high alert.  

Sadly, turning our planet into dust is fully consistent with the Israeli and Zionist mission.

It is down to world leaders to dismantle Israel and its powerful Jewish lobbies wisely and carefully, accepting all the time that we are dealing with a very lethal entity.

But it’s also down to each one of us to be fully attentive to Gordis’s exchange with his fellow Diaspora Jews.

It’s down to us to oppose any form or symptom of Jewish power: Zionist, ‘anti’ Zionist and Sabbath Goyim alike.

It is down to us to save ourselves and our universe, but also to save the Jews who are, unfortunately,  once again, about to bring yet another disaster on themselves and on us all.

The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics, Jewish political interest, Jewish Lobby and beyond..

The book can be  ordered  on Amazon.com  or Amazon.co.uk

Related Posts :

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: