DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

REAL NEWS Sept 27 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on September 26, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : September 27, 2012

” WAKING UP THE WORLD ONE DAY AT A TIME ! “

=================================================================================================

How To Start A War In One Easy Step

 

 

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on September 26, 2012 by Admin

Lions of Liberty – by Marc Clair  

War Is The Health Of The State – Randolph Bourne

Time and time again, when a State is in trouble with it’s populace, you can be darn-tootin’ the first thing they will look to do is to distract the populace and redirect their anger.  

Throughout history no method has proven more effective in doing this than to take the country to war.

 War was Hitler’s solution to the economic troubles of Germany caused by the hyperinflation of the in the period of the  Weimar Republic, just as entering World War II was Franklin Roosevelt’s solution the Great Depression.    

Contrary to the beliefs of “mainstream economists” like Paul Krugman will like to create.

What war does do is unite the populace around the State, and make them more forgiving of tough economic times.  

How many people in the ’1940′s would have accepted the idea of rationing if it wasn’t for the “greater good” of defeating those evil Nazis and Japanese?

Of course, the idea that the U.S. government would go to war for less than noble reasons has long been the relegated to the territory of fringe “conspiracy theories” associated with the likes of Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster.

 But the age of information is changing that , as the concept of false flags are becoming more and more accepted as a conspiracy fact. 

 It is now widely accepted that FDR was indeed well aware of the pending Japanese assault on Pearl Harbor that led to the U.S.’s direct involvement in World War II.  

It is also now known that the Gulf of Tonkin incident that led to the invasion of Vietnam never even happened.

Whether they simply “wait” for an event to happen as in the case of Pearl Harbor or completely manufacture it as in the case of the Gulf of  Tonkin, the point remains the same.  

When the Government wants a war, they will look for the reasons to get into it. And it only takes one easy step: Create An Enemy.

One would think that in the Age of YouTube, those that would falsely lead us into war would be a bit more careful about what they say and when they say it.  

See below the video of  Patrick Clawson, who heads the Washington Institute’s Iran Security Initiative, responding to a question about what should happen if negotiations with Tehran fail.

Israel Lobbyist suggests False Flag attack to start war with Iran

Poor Patrick seems a bit upset that “crisis initiation is very tough”.

 He then proceeds to name all of the events over time that have justified the United States going to war from the Fort Sumter incident that started justified Lincoln’s initiation of the American Civil War all the way up to the aforementioned Pearl Harbor and Gulf of Tonkin incidents.

 Clawson goes on to discuss how a war with Iran could be initiated, while trying to do his best Jackie Mason impression:

“Sometimes Iranian submarines periodically go down. Some day one of them might not come up. Who would know why?

We can do a variety of things if we wish to increase the pressure.

I’m not advocating that, but I’m just suggesting that this is not a either/or proposition of just sanctions have to succeed or other things.  We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians.

We could get nastier at that”.

Ah, I see.

Clawson isn’t advocating a false flag, he is merely suggesting that maaaaaybe it might be something to consider before just flat out saying the U.S. is currently using “covert means” to plan such a thing.

 What a standup guy!

The only way to prevent something like this from occurring is to make people more aware of the possibility.  

Because however it starts, a war with Iran will have much broader global implications and many believe it could lead to a Third World War. 

With the newly minted 2013 NDAA being prepped to fully legalize a war with Iran coupled with statements like these from people in the know, it’s certainly something we need to be wary of.

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can’t have free speech and Zionism, Mr. President!

 

 

US President Obama delivers foreign policy

speech at the UN — September 25, 2012~~

From Veteran News Now

by Alan Hart – September 26, 2012

Editor’s note: “There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents,” Mr. Obama told the General Assembly. 

Mr. President, that is precisely what American missiles and drones have been doing in Libya, Yemen and Pakistan — “killing innocents” and American missiles and weapons are being used by Israel for decades to “kill innocents” in defenseless Lebanon and Palestine.

Indeed! there are no words that excuse the killing of innocents sir!

===================================================================================

As the New York Times put it, “President Obama used his last major address on a global stage before the November election to deliver a strong defense of America’s belief in freedom of speech, challenging fledgling Arab and North African democracies to ensure that right even in the face of violence.”

My challenge to the president is this. “When you are back in the White House for a second term, will you do whatever is necessary to ensure that all Americans (Congressmen and women especially) can enjoy the right of free speech even in the face of the Zionist lobby’s offensive to suppress it?”

Alan Hart is a former ITN and BBC Panorama foreign correspondent who has covered wars and conflicts wherever they were taking place in the world and specialized in the Middle East.

His Latest book  Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, Vol. 1: The False Messiah, is a three-volume epic in its American edition. He blogs at AlanHart.com.

===================================================================================

U.S. Arming of Israel: How U.S. Weapons Manufacturers Profit From Middle East Conflict

 SEE VIDEO HERE : http://www.democracynow.org/2006/7/21/u_s_arming_of_israel_how

A new report by the World Policy Institute examines how the United States provides billions of dollars of military aid to Israel each year and how their current arsenal is composed of U.S made equipment.

Related Posts :

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

The UN Continues Pushing to Take Away Your Second Amendment Rights

 

 

 From the Trenches World Report

Posted on September 26, 2012 bClark Kent

Gun Owners of America 

 We can all breathe a sigh of relief that the Obama administration was forced to pull out of signing the Arms TradeTreaty in July. 

Following its actions, China and Russia also balked.

So congratulations, once again, are in order — as your hard work paid off handsomely. 

Over 50 US Senators ultimately signed a letter opposing this abomination!

But don’t think the UN has pulled back from its unremitting efforts to destroy your constitutional rights.

Earlier this month, the UN’s “Review Conference on Illicit Small Arms Trade” adopted an anti-gun “consensus outcome document” with the acquiescence of the Obama administration.

Among other things, the document, in the UN’s own words, “underscored efforts in marking, record-keeping and cooperation in tracing small arms ….”  We all understand that this verbiage is code for national gun registration.

And in the words of the UN, “Member States agreed to strengthen national measures on marking ….” 

Now “marking” can mean many things. 

But we know from records of UN discussions, that one of the things it means is “microstamping.”

This procedure to imprint a unique identifier on fired cartridges, may or may not be safely scientifically achievable. 

And at any rate, it is very costly.

Thus without admitting it, microstamping requirements could effectively put an end to your Second Amendment rights.

Now, the “consensus outcome document” will certainly not have the punch of a Senate-ratified treaty. 

Nevertheless, we cannot assume it will not be a threat — or that the President won’t try to implement certain parts of it through Executive Order. 

Of course, Barack Obama could do an illegal Executive Order or illegal regulation with or without UN encouragement, and that is something we might be facing during a second presidential term, if he is re-elected.

ACTION:  Click here to contact your Senators and ask them to block funding for implementing the UN “consensus outcome document” on small arms.

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revealed: 64 Drone Bases on American Soil

 

 

From WIRED – DANGER ROOM

See DoD Current and Future U.S. Drone Activities Map Click Here

We like to think of the drone war as something far away, fought in the deserts of Yemen or the mountains of Afghanistan.

But we now know it’s closer than we thought.

There are 64 drone bases on American soil.

That includes 12 locations housing Predator and Reaper unmanned aerial vehicles, which can be armed.

Public Intelligence, a non-profit that advocates for free access to information, released a map of military UAV activities in the United States on Tuesday.

Assembled from military sources — especially this little-known June 2011 Air Force presentation (.pdf) – it is arguably the most comprehensive map so far of the spread of the Pentagon’s unmanned fleet.

What exact missions are performed at those locations, however, is not clear.

Some bases might be used as remote cockpits to control the robotic aircraft overseas, some for drone pilot training.

Others may also serve as imagery analysis depots.

The medium-size Shadow is used in 22 bases, the smaller Raven in 20 and the miniature Wasp in 11.

California and Texas lead the pack, with 10 and six sites, respectively, and there are also 22 planned locations for future bases.

 ”It is very likely that there are more domestic drone activities not included in the map, but it is designed to provide an approximate overview of the widespread nature of Department of Defense activities throughout the US,” Michael Haynes from Public Intelligence tells Danger Room.

The possibility of military drones (as well as those controlled by police departments and universities) flying over American skies have raised concerns among privacy activists.

As the American Civil Liberties Union explained in its December 2011 report, the machines potentially could be used to spy on American citizens.

The drones’ presence in our skies “threatens to eradicate existing practical limits on aerial monitoring and allow for pervasive surveillance, police fishing expeditions, and abusive use of these tools in a way that could eventually eliminate the privacy Americans have traditionally enjoyed in their movements and activities.”

As Danger Room reported last month, even military drones, which are prohibited from spying on Americans, may “accidentally” conduct such surveillance — and keep the data for months afterwards while they figure out what to do with it.

The material they collect without a warrant, as scholar Steven Aftergood revealed, could then be used to open an investigation.

The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the U.S. military from operating on American soil, and there’s no evidence that drones have violated it so far.

This new map comes almost two months after the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) revealed another one, this time of public agencies – including police departments and universities – that have a permit issued by the Federal Aviation Agency to use UAVs in American airspace.

“It goes to show you how entrenched drones already are,” said Trevor Timm, an EFF activist, when asked about the new map.

“It’s clear that the drone industry is expanding rapidly and this map is just another example of that. And if people are worried about military technology coming back and being sold in the US, this is just another example how drone technology is probably going to proliferate in the US very soon.”

Domestic proliferation isn’t the same as domestic spying, however.

Most — if not all — of these military bases would make poor surveillance centers.

Many of the locations are isolated, far from civilian populations.

Almost half of the bases on the map work only with the relatively small Raven and Shadow drones; their limited range and endurance make them imperfect spying tools, at best.

It’s safe to assume that most of the bases are just used for military training.

Privacy concerns aside, the biggest issue might be safety, as we were been reminded on Monday when a giant Navy drone crashed in Maryland.

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

UN General Assembly: Israel subjugated to Palestine

Israel awaits the dramatic decisions of Palestinian President Abbas

 

 

Israeli Apartheid | by Latuf

Israeli Apartheid | by Latuf

From ROI TOV

At the 2012, 67th UN General Assembly, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu became irrelevant.

The most overwhelming sign of this were surprising commentaries in the Hebrew media.

Despite its main editors being under Netanyahu’s control, the media’s main concern was what will Palestine President Mahmoud Abbas say and do.

Politically, Israel became subjugated to Palestine.

This was the result of dramatic events surrounding the UN General Debate. Israel publicly lost the support of its main ally—the USA—on the issue of an attack on Iran; it faces a diplomatic attack from its neighbor Egypt, and fears a Palestinian announcement on the dismantlement of the Palestinian Authority.

Netanyahu is not the man to face such harsh reality with equanimity; in fact Israel panicked and brought out a confused plan to trick Mahmoud Abbas into delivering a pro-Zionist speech.

To fulfill this Machiavellian plan, Israel recruited a Jewish Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. But, I’m rushing ahead.

Prologue: The Entire World is Against Netanyahu

President Obama

Apparently, President Obama gave up on the Jewish vote for the imminent U.S. presidential elections.

After all, never in American history had this minority decided the election’s fate (see Romney, Obama, and the Israeli Vote).

Obama is not well-seen in Israel, where he is a popular target of racist caricatures.

According to Hebrew media, Obama and Netanyahu have nil personal relations between them; both gave up on an improvement.

This is to such an extent that president Obama gave up not only on the Jewish vote, but also on the Jewish money which is much more influential during a presidential campaign. Oddly enough, this made President Obama free to pursue American interests.

President Obama at UN 67th General Assembly

In recent months Netanyahu was trying to obtain a formal statement from president Obama regarding the red lines that if crossed by Iran would lead to an attack against it by the USA.

The details requested by Netanyahu included uranium enrichment levels and weapons development.

One week before the beginning of the UN General Assembly, Netanyahu said “the sooner we establish [red lines], the greater the chances that there won’t be a need for other types of action.”

He was referring to military actions by Israel and the USA against Iran.

Secretary of State Clinton replied on the same day “we’re not setting deadlines.”

This was emphasized by White House spokesman Jay Carney “It is not fruitful as part of this process to engage in that kind of specificity.”

In other words, Netanyahu cannot start a war on Iran.

He can’t even threat since he obviously lacks support from America. The USA won’t sacrifice two million sons for the sake of Israel’s belligerent goals.

As expanded in UN General Assembly: Egypt hits Israel, the next one to spoil Israel’s game was Egyptian President Mohammad Morsi.

In an interview to the New York Times, which preceded his UN speech, he said “If Washington is asking Egypt to honor its treaty with Israel, he said, Washington should also live up to its own Camp David commitment to Palestinian self-rule.”

In other words, he politely accused Israel of not honoring the peace agreement.

Under such circumstances, Egypt cannot be expected to observe it.

Netanyahu faces also a third threat, by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who is threatening to dismantle the Palestinian Authority if the peace talks with Israel don’t advance.

The result of such a step would be a Third Intifada, which will make the first two look like pale rehearsals to it.

Sweating profusely, Netanyahu pulled out of a dusty Mossad drawer an unbelievable plan.

Netanyahu’s Best Idea

On September 24, 2012, Mahmoud Abbas met American Jewish leaders in New York.

Among them was Alan Dershowitz, who is a Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School.

A supporter of Israel, Dershowitz asked Abbas to adopt the formula he had proposed on June 3, 2012, in a Wall Street Journal editorial and is known as the “Dershowitz Formula.”

Less dramatic than its name, it specifies the conditions for the renewal of the negotiations between Israel and Palestine.

Israel, American Jews and Dershowitz himself claim he is in a perfect position to make a fair offer that will be accepted by both sides.

Considering his Zionist connections, this claim is highly dubious.

The formula was stated by Professor Dershowitz as “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should now offer a conditional freeze: Israel will stop all settlement building in the West Bank as soon as the Palestinian Authority sits down at the bargaining table, and the freeze will continue as long as the talks continue in good faith.”

As typical in Jewish affairs, oral conditions were included.

In the meeting with Abbas, the Jewish leaders requested Abbas to “recognize the Jewish link to Israel.”

In other words, the Jewish leaders asked the Palestinians to recognize Israel’s Law of return, which defines automatic citizenship to any Jew arriving at Israel.

Typically, Israel never defined accurately “Who is a Jew?”

This semantic trap allows the Israeli Administration to do what it pleases, regardless of its own laws.

Why should a Jewish-American law professor be considered a fair facilitator in the renewal of the Palestinian-Israeli talks?

Not even he is smart enough to answer this.

Moreover, he showed an astounding amount of “chutzpah”—Hebrew for “insolence”—when asking something for nothing.

We have been there. Israel froze the settlements’ expansion a million times.

Every time it violated the fragile agreement achieved with the Palestinians; the last time this happened was in 2011.

There is no reason to believe this time Israel will behave differently.

In exchange, Israel requests an important declaration from the Palestinians which would be impossible to deny afterwards.

Netanyahu is trying to distract Abbas, trying to convince him to drop what will probably be an historical speech and replace it with a pro-Zionist speech.

Will Abbas succumb to this entrapment attempt?

Israeli Peace Plan | by Latuf

Israeli Peace Plan | by Latuf

Spingola Specials : Roi Tov
The interview can be listened at
Deanna Spingola – RBN – interview with Ken Freeland, speaking for Roi Tov 
and Deanna’s schedule is at Spingola Specials

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

He was the man who saved the world by single-handedly averting World War Three five decades ago

The man who saved the world: The Soviet submariner who single-handedly averted WWIII at height of the Cuban Missile Crisis

  • U.S.S.R. and U.S. stood on brink of nuclear war during Cuban Missile Crisis

  • Four Russian submarines secretly set sail to Cuba, with nuclear weapons

  • Vasili Arkhipov, who died in 1998, used last veto against firing sub’s torpedo

  • The Russians instead surrendered and his action avoided World War Three

From Mail Online

By LEON WATSON and MARK DUELL – September 25, 2012

He was the man who saved the world by single-handedly averting World War Three five decades ago, yet he died humiliated, outcast and an unknown. Only now has his story has come to light.

A documentary shown tonight told how for 13 days during the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, the world held its breath as the U.S.S.R. and the U.S. stood on the brink of nuclear war.

At the height of the Cold War, when paranoia on both sides meant the slightest provocation could spark nuclear war, four submarines secretly set sail from Russia to communist Cuba.

vasili-arkhipov.jpg
VASILY ARKHIPOV

 Averted war: Vasili Arkhipoy (pictured above, and bottom aboard a submarine), saved the world by single-handedly averting World War Three with one decision 50 years ago, yet he died humiliated, outcast and an unknown

Only a handful of the submariners on board knew that their ships carried nuclear weapons, each with the strength of the bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in 1945.

Vasili Arkhipov, aboard the sub B59, was one of them. As his craft neared Cuba, U.S. helicopters, aeroplanes and battleships were scouring the ocean for Russian subs.

‘At that period of time it was called “special weapon”, not “nuclear torpedo”,’ said Viktor Mikhailov, junior navigator on Sub B-59. ‘At that time we couldn’t even imagine a nuclear torpedo.’

In a game of high stakes cat and mouse it wasn’t long before the Russians were spotted. Arkhipov’s sub was forced to make an emergency dive.

Man Who Saved the World. Vasili and wife Olga in 1957
Man Who Saved the World Vasili with his daughter Yelena three years before he died

Remembered: Arkhipov is pictured above with his wife Olga in 1957, and bottom with his daughter Yelena, three years before he died in 1998

Tense: For 13 days during the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, the world held its breath as the USSR and the U.S. stood on the brink of nuclear war

Tense: For 13 days during the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, the world held its breath as the USSR and the U.S. stood on the brink of nuclear war

As the submariners tried to stay hidden from their US hunters, conditions in the sub deteriorated. For a week they stayed underwater, in sweltering 60C heat, rationed to just one glass of water a day.

Above them, the U.S. navy were ‘hunting by exhaustion’ – trying to force the Soviet sub to come to the surface to recharge its batteries.

They had no idea that on board the submarines were weapons capable of destroying the entire American fleet.

Gary Slaughter, a signalman on board the USS Cony battleship, said: ‘We knew they were probably having trouble breathing. It was hot as hell in there, they were miserable.’

Mr President: John F. Kennedy was in office in the U.S. between 1961 and 1963, at the height of the crisis

Mr President: John F. Kennedy was in office in the U.S. between 1961 and 1963, at the height of the crisis

Tense: The documentary recreated the dramatic moment when Soviet sailors decided not to fire the weapon

Tense: The documentary recreated the dramatic moment when Soviet sailors decided not to fire the weapon

‘They were cramped together and they had been under great stress for a long time. Basically what we were trying to do was apply passive torture. 

‘Frankly I don’t think we felt any sympathy for them at all. They were the enemy.’

The Americans decided to ratchet up the pressure, and dropped warning grenades into the sea. Inside the sub, the Soviet submariners thought they were under attack.

Valentin Savitsky, the captain of B59, was convinced the nuclear war had already started. 

He demanded that the submariners launch their torpedo to save some of Russia’s pride.

The programme on Channel 5 revealed how in any normal circumstances Savitsky’s orders would have been followed, and World War Three would have been unleashed.

'Close friend': Ryurik Ketov, commander of Sub B-4, said Arkhipov was 'cool-headed' and 'in control'

‘Close friend’: Ryurik Ketov, commander of Sub B-4, said Arkhipov was ‘cool-headed’ and ‘in control’

Memories: Viktor Mikhailov, junior navigator on Sub B-59, said they had a 'special weapon' on board, which was not even referred to as a 'nuclear weapon'

Memories: Viktor Mikhailov, junior navigator on Sub B-59, said they had a ‘special weapon’ on board, which was not even referred to as a ‘nuclear weapon’

Ryurik Ketov, commander of another sub, Sub B-4, said: ‘Vasili Arkhipov was a submariner and a close friend of mine. He was a family friend. He stood out for being cool-headed. He was in control.’

Savitsky hadn’t counted on Arkhipov. As commander of the fleet, Arkhipov had the last veto. And although his men were against him, he insisted that they must not fire – and instead surrender.

It was a humiliating move – but one that saved the world. The Soviet submariners were forced to return to their native Russia, where they were given the opposite of a hero’s welcome.

Historian Thomas Blanton told the Sun: ‘What heroism, what duty, they fulfilled to go halfway across the world and come back, and survive.’

Covert mission: In a game of high stakes cat and mouse it wasn't long before the Russian's were spotted

Covert mission: In a game of high stakes cat and mouse it wasn’t long before the Russian’s were spotted

Proud: Arkopov's widow Olga said: 'I was proud and I am proud of my husband, always'widow Olga said: 'I was proud and I am proud of my husband, always.'

Proud: Arkopov’s widow Olga said: ‘I was proud and I am proud of my husband, always’

‘But in fact, one of the Russian admirals told the submariners; “It would have been better if you’d gone down with your ship.” Extraordinary.’

Four decades passed before the story of what really happened on the B59 sub was discovered. It was after Arkipov had died in 1998 from radiation poisoning. 

But to his widow Olga, he was always a hero.

She said: ‘He knew that it was madness to fire the nuclear torpedo. In Cuba, in honour of the 40th anniversary of the crisis, people gathered.

‘They said that the person who prevented a nuclear war was the Russian submariner Vasili Arkhipov. I was proud and I am proud of my husband always.’

END

 

 

 

 

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

7 Responses to “REAL NEWS Sept 27 2012”

  1. Latonya said

    Very nice article and straight to the point. I don’t know if this is truly the best place to ask but do you folks have any thoughts on where to employ some professional writers? Thanks 🙂

    Like

  2. This is exactly the thing I’ve been rummaging for! Wonderful and thanks very much!

    Like

  3. click here said

    Hey there, just became alerted to your blog through Google, and found that it’s really informative. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Lots of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

    Like

  4. chant said

    chant…

    […]REAL NEWS Sept 27 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…

    Like

  5. click here said

    click here…

    […]REAL NEWS Sept 27 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…

    Like

  6. read more said

    read more…

    […]REAL NEWS Sept 27 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…

    Like

  7. Plutosport Gutschein Dezember 2013…

    […]REAL NEWS Sept 27 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: