DaniMartExtras, Too


REAL NEWS Oct. 02 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on October 1, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : October 02, 2012



United States of America Corporation looting individual bank accounts to postpone bankruptcy



From Benjamin Fulford’s Blog

October 01, 2012

The United States of America Corporation, a subsidiary of the bloodline family owned Federal Reserve Board, has resorted to stealing private funds, and blaming it on “Iranian cyber-attacks,” in order to stave off bankruptcy, according to CIA and other sources.

This desperate stalling maneuver comes as the members of the old pentagram of power, David Rockefeller, George Bush Senior, Queen Elizabeth, Evelyn de Rothschild and the Pope all argue amongst each other over what to do next.

The overall picture is that the Queen and the Pope are funneling money to Obama and pushing for his re-election, while the Rockefellers and Bushes are looking towards Asia, according to both CIA and Vatican sources.

This leaves the Rothschild’s out on a limb and isolated.

Their plan to start war and mayhem in the Middle-East, prior to doubling oil prices, is now starting to look like a really bad, if not fatal, chess move.  

Word has also now come back from the Vatican archives about the fate of the Menorahs taken from the Temple of Solomon by troops of the Roman Emperor Titus.

According to a senior Vatican archivist…

Become a member and finish reading at : Weekly Geopolitical News and Analys








Sobering! Latest Motion: NDAA Military Detention IS Martial Law



From Alexander Higgins Blog

Posted by  – October 1, 2012

The latest motion to fight Obama’s NDAA detention of US citizens provides a sobering picture of what the Corporate media is blacking out.

NDAA Detention Is Martial Law

If you have any doubt that Obama continues to fight tooth and nail for the right to indefinitely detain civilians captured on US soil because perhaps the media hasn’t reported on it or the limited reporting you have read from the corporate media  has spun the truth  reading the latest motion filed by the plaintiff’s in the case will certainly send chills down your spine.

Point by point the motion counters Obama’s latest motion which the courts agree with and granted him the right to continue to impose military detention on US citizens pending a hearing by the district courts.

Obama Wins Right To Indefinitely Detain Americans Under NDAA

Obama wins right to indefinitely detain Americans under NDAA

An appeals court has granted the Obama administration’s appeal to overturn a ban on the indefinite detention of American Citizens under the NDAA.

Read more »

What is really chilling about the motion is the case-law Obama is citing to argue his Obama’s position that he should be allowed to detain American citizens without trial or charge.

Ultimately the case-law has roots in court rulings that set military detention precedent during the Civil War and when civilians fought detention in the concentration camps the United States set up during World War 2.

Perhaps more shocking is once you are finished reading the motion you will understand that what is being argued here is the NDAA is unequivocally a declaration of Martial Law.

To recap on what the NDAA authorizes:

The legislation authorizes the President of the United States to take unilateral military action against all nations, organizations, and persons, both domestically and abroad, who are alleged to be currently or who have in the past supported or engaged in hostilities or who have provided aid in support of hostilities against the United States or any of its coalition allies.

The legislation removes the requirement of congressional approval for the use of military force and instead gives the President totalitarian dictatorial authority to engage in any and all military actions for an indefinite period of time.

It even gives the President the authority to launch attacks against American Citizens inside the United States with no congressional oversight whatsoever.

Just to recap:

  • Endless War – The war will continue until all hostilities are terminated, which will never happen.

  • No Borders – The president will have the full authority to launch military strikes against any country, organization or person, including against U.S citizens on U.S soil.

  • Unilateral MilitaryAction – Full authority to invade any nation at any time without congressional approval required.

  • No Clearly Defined Enemy – The US can declare or allege anyone a terrorist or allege they are or have been supporting “hostilities” against the US and attack at will.

  • Authorization To Invade Several Countries – The president would have full authority to invade Iran, Syria, North Korea, along with several other nations in Africa and the Middle East and even Russia and China under the legislation all of which are “known” to have supported and aided hostilities against the United States.

Simply put martial law is military law in which the military law, military courts and military detention takes precedent over civil law.

During martial law the civil law protections of the US Constitution  are suspended or superseded by the Military rule of law and Obama is arguing that the NDAA indeed grants him the right to attempt to impose military detention on US civilians captured on US soil.

Clearly by it’s very definition this is martial law and to be clear this isn’t hyperbole or a sensationalist interpretation made on my behalf.

The motion clearly mentioned Martial law several times and bluntly explains that the powers the Congress has granted under the NDAA which are being asserted by Obama are indeed martial law powers.

In the motion it clearly argues that the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled against all case instances of the President attempting to impose a military rule of law on the president.

Cut through the lies Obama is telling and TV and the corporate media is reporting and read the motion for yourself so you can get a real understanding of what is being fought against here.


Read the full 47 page motion by Obama Here 


Related Posts :








Summary of False Flag Operations and False Flag Terrorism



From the Trenches World Report

Posted on October 1, 2012 by REDHORSE

Want to Know

“False flag terrorism” occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people. 

The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy.

Or as Wikipedia defines it:

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as if they are being carried out by other entities.

The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own.

False flag operations are not limited to war and counterinsurgency operations, and have been used in peacetime; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.

The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own navy.

Because the enemy’s flag was hung instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, it was called a “false flag” attack.

There are many examples of false flag attacks throughout history.

For example, it is widely known that the Nazis, in Operation Himmler, faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. 

And it has now been persuasively argued — as shown, for example, in this History Channel video — that Nazis set fire to their own parliament, the Reichstag, and blamed that fire on others. 

The Reichstag fire was the watershed event which justified Hitler’s seizure of power and suspension of liberties.

And in the early 1950s, agents of an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers).

Israel’s Defense Minister was brought down by the scandal, along with the entire Israeli government.

Click here for verification.

The Russian KGB apparently conducted a wave of bombings in Russia in order to justify war against Chechnya and put Vladimir Putin into power (see also this essay and this report).

And the Turkish government has been caught bombing its own and blaming it on a rebel group to justify a crackdown on that group. Muslim governments also play this game.

For example, the well-respected former Indonesian president claimed that their government had a role in the Bali bombings.

This sounds nuts, right?

You’ve never heard of this “false flag terrorism,” where a government attacks its own people then blames others in order to justify its goals, right?

And you are skeptical of the statements discussed above?

Please take a look at these historical quotes:

“If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” – U.S. President James Madison

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy,

and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. 

That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” – Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

What about the U.S.?

Is it logical to assume that, even if other countries have carried out false flag operations (especially horrible regimes such as, say, the Nazis or Stalin), the U.S. has never done so?

Well, as documented by the New York TimesIranians working for the C.I.A. in the 1950′s posed as Communists and staged bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president (see also this essay).

And, as confirmed by a former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence, NATO carried out terror bombings in Italy with the help of the Pentagon and CIA and blamed communists in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.

As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security.”

Moreover, declassified U.S. Government documents show that in the 1960s, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan code-named Operation Northwoods to blow up American airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes),

and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba.

The operation was not carried out only because the Kennedy administration refused to implement these Pentagon plans.

For lots more on the astonishing Operation Northwoods, see the ABC news reportthe official declassified documents; and watch this interview with James Bamford, the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. 

One quote from the Northwoods documents states: “A ‘Remember the Maine’ incident could be arranged: We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.”

What about Al-Qaeda?

You might think Al-Qaeda is different. It is very powerful, organized, and out to get us, right?Consider this Los Angeles Times article, reviewing a BBC documentary entitled The Power of Nightmares, which shows that the threat from Al Qaeda has been vastly overblown (and see this article on who is behind the hype).

And former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski testified to the Senate that the war on terror is “a mythical historical narrative.”

And did you know that the FBI had penetrated the cell which carried out the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, but had – at the last minute – cancelled the plan to have its FBI infiltrator substitute fake powder for real explosives, against the infiltrator’s strong wishes?

See also this TV news report.

Have you heard that the CIA is alleged to have met with Bin Laden two months before 9/11?

Did you know that years after 9/11 the FBI first stated that it did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute Bin Laden for 9/11?

(See also this partial confirmation by the Washington Post)

And did you see the statement in Newsweek by the CIA commander in charge of the capture that the U.S. let Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan?

Have you heard that the anthrax attacks – which were sent along with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists – used a weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility?

Indeed,top bioweapons experts have stated that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test “gone wrong.”

For more on this, see this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer and this statement by a distinguished law professor and bioterror expert (and this one).

It is also interesting that the only Congress members mailed anthrax letters were key Democrats, and that the attacks occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing PATRIOT Act, which seems to have scared them and the rest of Congress into passing that act without even reading it.

And though it may be a coincidence, White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before the Anthrax attacks occurred.

Even General William Odom, former director of the National Security Agency, said “By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism, yet in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation” (the audio is here).

Why Does This Matter?

Please read what the following highly respected people are saying:

Former prominent Republican U.S. Congressman and CIA official Bob Barr stated that the U.S. is close to becoming a totalitarian society and that elements in government are using fear to try to bring this about.

Republican U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated that the government is determined to have martial law.”

He also said a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran.” 

Former National Security Adviser Brzezinski told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify yet another war.

The former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration, Paul Craig Roberts, who is called the “Father of Reaganomics” and is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street JournalBusinessWeek, and Scripps Howard News Service, has said:

Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging ‘terrorist’ attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?”

Retired 27-year CIA analyst Ray McGovern, who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents, stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law.

He went on to say:

“We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation – big violent explosions of some kind – we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want.”

The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to “play fast and loose” with terror alerts and warnings and even terrorist events in order to rally people behind the flag.

General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in the United States the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government.”

Former UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction.

He is now saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government.

And British Parliament Member George Galloway stated that “there is a very real danger” that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically.

The abundance of reliable information in this essay suggests that not only has the U.S. in the past conducted false flag operations, but there is a possibility that 9/11 involved some element of this deceit, and a future false flag operation cannot be ruled out.

 Let us spread this news to all who care so that we might build the critical mass necessary to stop these secret operations and work together for a more caring civil society.








Central Bankers Inflate Fiat While Plans for One World Currency Are Finalized



From Charleston Voice

October 01, 2012

…and why secession from the eurozone is not an option by member countries any less than the American southern states could not secede from Washington’s tyranny.

Retention of national sovereignties with sovereign currencies are not allowed, and will be crushed in any attempt to secede. One political dictatorship with one world currency is your only fate as it is right now.

Your own political leaders have sold you out. Change it, or live with it.

Susanne Posel 
October 1st, 2012

According to Deutsche Bank analysts Daniel Brebner and Xiao Fu, gold is “not really a commodity at all.”

Berbner and Fu explain: “While it is included in the commodities basket it is in fact a medium of exchange and one that is officially recognized (if not publically used as such).

We see gold as an officially recognized form of money for one primary reason: it is widely held by most of the world’s larger central banks as a component of reserves.”

Gold is deemed “good money” and fiat currency is represented as “bad money” because the central banking cartels confuse the worth of paper over precious metals to keep the populace in the dark as to currency value to claim a monopoly over worth and circulation as well as hoard precious metals for consumption purposes.

Berbner and Fu further elaborate that: “Fiat currencies physically have no use other than that which is prescribed to them by government and accepted by the public. That fiat currencies cost little to produce is of a secondary concern and we believe, quite irrelevant to the primary purpose.”

This month, the Vatican has announced their support of a new global bank.

They have endorsed the UN’s endeavor toward global governance over all fiat currency – as long as they are anointed to participate in the sovereign powers of such an institution.

The Vatican believes that the Bible imbues them with “super authority” over any emerging global financial system.

This may explain how they have been used as a shell bank for JPMorgan Chase and other private banking corporations as a money laundering house.

These actions by the lackeys for the central banking cartels have evaded prosecution and criminal retribution amid mysterious deaths such as Cardinal Paul Marcinkus in 2009 in Arizona after being involved with money laundering for international criminal syndicates.

Having the current incarnation of a global overreaching religion that pacifies millions of people worldwide on the board of directors of a world bank that controls all fiat currency would be advantageous for the global Elite, as well as the papal bankers.

Propaganda supporting a one world currency pervades the mainstream.

 Paul Solman, correspondent for the PBS NewsHour purveys the positive propaganda of one world currency by asserting that: “Ah, the dream: one world, one economy, one currency — and, of course, one global political system . . . a common currency means a common economic policy . . .”

Likewise, The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a group of technocrats that represent 420 banking cartels and financing houses have joined the cry for a one world currency.

Charles Dallara, managing director of the IIF, said: “A core group of the world’s leading economies need to come together and hammer out an understanding.

The narrowly focused unilateral and bilateral policy actions seen in recent months – including many proposed and actual measures on trade, currency intervention and monetary policy – have contributed to worsening underlying macroeconomic imbalances.

They have also led to growing protectionist pressures as countries scramble for export markets as a source of growth.”

In May, The UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has issued a report that proposes that the current system of world currencies and capital rules that govern the world’s economy need to be altered in order to stabilize our economic crisis.

UNCTAD wants to see the BRICs countries, known as the non-aligned nations, considered surplus nations, cut their imbalances, thereby taking the financial burden off of the UK and US as upholding the global reserve currency.

A global monetary system that replaces the US dollar as the global reserve currency will accomplish this goal.

The UN proposes a complete overhaul.

In the report “Adapting the International Monetary System to Face 21st Century Challenges”, they call for “more intense debate on and reforms to the international monetary system imply that the current system is unable to respond appropriately and adequately to challenges that have appeared, or become more acute, in recent years.

This paper focuses on four such challenges: ensuring an orderly exit from global imbalances, facilitating more complementary adjustments between surplus and deficit countries without recessionary impacts, better supporting international trade by reducing currency volatility and better providing development and climate finance.

After describing them, it proposes reforms to enable the international monetary system to better respond to these challenges.”

They recommend movement toward a global currency that will replace all current currencies.

Revaluation will be accessed and the worth of money would redistribute with oversight of the IMF, WTO and ultimately the UN.

In April, at the BRICs summit in New Delhi, the leaders in attendance discussed how to move away from the US dollar as the global reserve currency.

Vladimir Putin, president of Russia, explained: “One of the priorities of BRICs for the years to come should be the strengthening and key role of the UN’s Security Council in maintaining international peace and security.

And also ensuring that the UN is not used as a cover for regime change and unilateral actions to resolve conflict situations.”

BRICs surmised that a “basket currency” could allow non-aligned countries to trade with each other without the fears that the central banks and their fiat currency entail.

This would serve as an alternative to the US dollar and the Euro. It would empower other nations to rise up economically.

In a stance against the US dollar, BRICs countries have already begun to trade amongst themselves using approved currencies that are backed by precious metals.

The IMF and World Bank are alarmed by this move and highly disapprove of it.

At the same time, China was stock piling gold to back-up their fiat currency.

The purpose is to secure their country’s future by converting fiat to exchangeable currency, as well as use it as a leveraging tool to assist failing nations as insurance for a favor at a later date.

Subversively, the Obama administration made investing in America easier for China.

China was able to buy 35% of any auction of US Treasury bonds.

This was achieved through proxy. By the intent of Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed), China may have been broken financially through inflation brought on by the Fed.

Because Bernanke values the US dollar, he knows ahead of time what he will have to pay and can set up the perfect situation to make sure he pays what he wants.

Inflation is a direct result of the actions by the Fed. They print fiat US dollars in excess of the available monies and flood the monetary system.

This drives prices higher because it takes more US dollars to equal the amount of a US dollar.

Currently, the US dollar is sitting at a worth of $03.8 cents.

At a Senate Budget Committee meeting in April, Bernanke used fear to coerce lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

He stated: “Sustained high rates of government borrowing would both drain funds away from private investment and increase our debt to foreigners, with adverse long-run effects on US output, incomes, and standards of living.

Moreover, diminishing investor confidence that deficits will be brought under control would ultimately lead to sharply rising interest rates on government debt and, potentially, to broader financial turmoil.

In a vicious circle, high and rising interest rates would cause debt-service payments on the federal debt to grow even faster, resulting in further increases in the debt-to-GDP ratio and making fiscal adjustment all the more difficult.”

Just this past week, Bernanke announced QE3, an indefinite purchasing of mortgage-backed securities at $40 billion per month which will devastate the US dollar’s value through infinite printing of fiat and a “regressive redistribution program”.

The central bankers are intentionally destroying the US dollar because out of the ashes, they have planned a global fiat that will eventually replace all fiat across the world.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple








7,500 US officials serve Israel interest, Tel Aviv biggest threat to US



From PressTV

September 30, 2012

An international lawyer says while the US Intelligence Community (IC) considers Israel the greatest threat to America’s national interests, there are about 7,500 US officials “who do Israel’s bidding,” serving Tel Aviv’s interests with no reservation.

In an article published on Press TV website, Franklin Lamb noted that a study commissioned by the US Intelligence Community earlier this year, has reached the conclusion that the American national interest in fundamentally at odds with that of Zionist Israel. 

“It’s … an 82-page analysis [entitled: Preparing For A Post Israel Middle East] that concludes that … Israel is currently the greatest threat to US national interests because its nature and actions prevent normal US relations with Arab and Muslim countries and, to a growing degree, the wider international community,” Lamb added. 

The IC-commissioned study clearly stated that Israel is grossly interfering in the internal affairs of the United States through spying and illegal US arms transfers. 

“This includes supporting more than 60 ‘front organizations’ and approximately 7,500 US officials who do Israel’s bidding and seek to dominate and intimidate the media and agencies of the US government which should no longer be condoned.” 

According to the report, the analyst added, IC believes that Israel leadership, with its increasing support of the 700,000 illegal settlers on the occupied West Bank “is increasing out of touch with the political, military and economic realities of the Middle East.” 

The IC report also argued that as a result of Tel Aviv’s current brutal occupationist and belligerent policy, it “cannot be salvaged any more than apartheid South Africa could be.” 

“…as American power and influence recedes, the US commitment to belligerent oppressive Israel is becoming impossible to defend or execute given paramount US national interests which include normalizing relations with the 57 Islamic countries.”

Advising the US government to avoid “entangling alliances that alienate much of the world,” the IC noted that instead of getting militarily involved in the Middle East on behalf of Israel, the US should undertake “the repairing relations with Arab and Muslim countries including the drastically curtailed use of drone aircraft.” 

“US public opinion no longer supports funding and executing widely perceived illegal US wars on Israel’s behalf. This view is increasingly being shared by Europe, Asia and the International public.” 









(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777



7 Responses to “REAL NEWS Oct. 02 2012”

  1. Criminal Law…

    […]REAL NEWS Oct. 02 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  2. Types of Lawyers…

    […]REAL NEWS Oct. 02 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  3. affiliate marketing…

    […]REAL NEWS Oct. 02 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  4. Very descriptive post, I enjoyed that bit.
    Will there be a part 2?


  5. spectacle said


    […]REAL NEWS Oct. 02 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  6. Best prices New York movers | New Jersey movers…

    […]REAL NEWS Oct. 02 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  7. stackable washer dryer dimensions…

    […]REAL NEWS Oct. 02 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: