DaniMartExtras, Too


REAL NEWS Oct.19 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on October 18, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : October 19 – 21, 2012





{XANIEL’S NOTE : To anyone that actually gives a crap ! Consider this the weekend edition, as I won’t be back to update until Monday October 22, 2012, due to a family matter that must be addressed immediately.  Sorry for the inconvenience. }~~~Xaniel777




Virginia GOP Caught Throwing Away Voter Registrations

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on October 18, 2012 by NC

Crooks and Liars

 You know how every time they’re in control, Republicans grow the government and run into the ground to prove that government is inefficient and bloated?

Well, I think it’s time to realize that the GOP is now determined to prove that their cries of voter fraud are true… because they’re the ones committing it.

{XANIEL’S NOTE : But then, so are the Democrats ! }~~Xaniel777

This is really maddening:

On Monday I saw a really interesting story coming out of Harrisonburg on Facebook:

“I just saw a guy throw a bag of trash in my cardboard dumpster  and speed off. I went to get the bag and throw it in the trash dumpster. In the bag was a folder containing FILLED OUT VIRGINIA VOTER REGISTRATION FORMS!!

I called the Harrisonburg Registrars office and they sent the police who said they really didn’t know what to do in a case like this because it never happened before.

The police took the forms and left. I’m really concerned because today is the last day in Virginia to register to vote and if these forms are tied up while trying to figure out what to do, will these people be allowed to vote???

I’m tagging you Lowell since I thought you might want to follow up on this. I spoke with Debbie at the Harrisonburg office and police spoke with Doug at the Rockingham county registrars office”

 Who would drive up to a dumpster on the registration deadline day to throw away completed voter registration forms and why?
The car that drove up was a black Toyota Camry with Pennsylvania license plates.

Who would be in the Valley from Pennsylvania and have a bunch of completed voterregistration forms that they wanted to destroy?

Once this story hit Facebook, a number of people pointed out to theperson who witnessed this crime that the state GOP “Victory Office” was just a couple blocks away. 

Yesterday afternoon, guess what car was parked in front of the office?

Yep, a black Toyota Camry from Pennsylvania.

I guess when you’ve got so little to run on and you know you can’t win legitimately, the only thing left is to commit a federal crime and cheat voters of their right to vote. That “ends justify the means” attitude perfectly sums up Republican logic.

But wait, there’s more:

UPDATE: Sources close to the Rockingham County Sheriff’s Office are telling me that Strategic Allied Consulting is involved in this. This is the same group that was in the national news two weeks ago for their “registration” drive in Florida that had forms with made up voters.

Even more interesting. Strategic Allied Consulting shares a Virginia headquarters with two other notables.

#1- American Crossroads- the superpac founded by Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie

#2- The office of Virginia State Senator Jill Holtzman Vogel.

Oh Karl…how unsurprising to find your name connected to this.

I’m gonna go out on a limb right now and say that Virginia’s wingnut Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli will do absolutely nothing about this kind of blatant crime, but he sure was at the forefront of making one of the more stringent voter ID laws in the nation.


Gun Restrictions Coming After The Election

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on October 18, 2012 by # 1 NWO Hatr

Before It’s News – by Josey Wales

 Anytime you start talking about a coming bans on firearms, people come out of the woodwork to tell you how crazy you are and how that could never happen in America.

Well if you watched [Tuesday’s] presidential debate, it should be painfully obvious that this is no conspiracy theory.

Come election time, gun owners are going to be under attack from new federal legislation that will severely limit what you can and can’t purchase.

Anyone who believes in the right to bear arms, needs to start paying serious attention to what’s going on.

In a very telling sign of what’s to come, both candidates seemed to indicate that the so called “assault weapons ban” could be again rearing its ugly head.

While Romney didn’t say that he would outright introduce the ban nationally, he did admit that he supported a ban on these firearms while Governor of Massachusetts.

On the other hand, President Barack Obama admitted that during a second term his agenda would include, reintroducing a ban on what he calls, “assault weapons”.

This legislation would ban firearms like, AR15’s, AK47’s and numerous other rifles and shotguns.

In the debate Obama said:

…”What I’m trying to do is to get a broader conversation about how do we reduce the violence generally. Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban reintroduced.”

As we’ve pointed our numerous times in the past, we have two of the most anti-gun presidential candidates in history running for office.

While one candidate, President Obama, has now come out and telegraphed his intentions for the world to hear; the other candidate also has a pretty shady gun record that we must be aware of.

During a February 18, 2007 interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, Romney was asked to reconcile his support for an assault weapons ban and the Brady background check law with his then-recent decision to join the National Rifle Association.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Let’s talk about guns. You were supportive of the Brady Bill, the handgun waiting period in the past. You sign an assault weapon ban into law, and you said in the past, I don’t line up with the NRA. Now you –

ROMNEY: Well, on that, on that issue.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Now you’re a member of the NRA.

ROMNEY: Yes. And I – and I know the NRA does not support an assault weapon ban, so I don’t line up on that particular issue with the NRA, either does President Bush. He likewise says he supported an assault weapon ban. [This Week via Nexis, 2/18/07]

During a 2002 debate, gubernatorial candidate Romney declared, “We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them. I won’t chip away at them; I believe they protect us and provide for our safety.” [The Boston Globe, 1/14/07]

And he did exactly that as governor.

In a July 1, 2004 press release titled “Romney Signs Off On Permanent Assault Weapons Ban,” Romney explained the rationale behind signing the ban into law, including his belief that assault weapons are “instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people”:

In a move that will help keep the streets and neighborhoods of Massachusetts safe, Governor Mitt Romney today signed into law a permanent assault weapons ban that forever makes it harder for criminals to get their hands on these dangerous guns.

“Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts,” Romney said, at a bill signing ceremony with legislators, sportsmen’s groups and gun safety advocates.  “These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense.  They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people.”

Like the federal assault weapons ban, the state ban, put in place in 1998, was scheduled to expire in September. 

The new law ensures these deadly weapons, including AK-47s, UZIs and Mac-10 rifles, are permanently prohibited in Massachusetts no matter what happens on the federal level.

The leading Massachusetts gun advocacy group, Gun Owners Action League (GOAL), was furious with Romney over the new  law.

Its own press release titled “Firearm Reform Bill Signed, Romney Takes Opportunity to Betray Gun Owners,” attacked Romney for lining up with Democratic gun violence prevention stalwarts Ted Kennedy and John Kerry on the assault weapons issue.

GOAL encouraged its members “to contact Governor Mitt Romney and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey and express their outrage with their betrayal of gun owners in Massachusetts.”

If voters are confused about Romney’s position on guns, the National Rifle Association is partly to blame.

In a recent interview with the NRA, the gun rights organization did not press Romney to expand on his previous stances when he said, “I do not support any additional laws to restrict the right to keep and bear arms.”

Chris Cox, the NRA’s chief lobbyist, who interviewed Romney, asked leading questions such as, “As governor, you signed a major bill reforming Massachusetts’ gun registration and licensing laws. Some in the media and elsewhere claim this bill was a re-authorization of the semi-auto ban in Massachusetts. What’s your response?”

In response, Romney claimed that he was “proud to support legislation that expanded the rights of gun owners.”

When election time rolls around, gun owners are going to have a lot to watch out for.


Preppers Go No-Fly?

From Urban Survival

By George Ure – October 18, 2012

A disturbing headline making the rounds in the prepper community this morning reads The Red List:  Prepper Put On No Fly List, Escorted Off Plane Under Armed Guard.

On the surface, it appears Kafkaesque: 

A man stuck in Hawaii, unable to fly either to his destination to visit his active-duty military wife on Okinawa, nor could he be allowed to return to the US mainland. 

All because, goes the story, he was involved (apparently) in the Mississippi Preparedness Project.

On a quick review, the MPP doesn’t sound very threatening: 

They are pro-Constitution, they work with the Tea Party, Oath Keepers, and other groups says their site. 

Not only that, but their “five pillars” are communications, water, good, medical, and security.

What’s more, the group has a take off on the five color alert system used by Homeland Security, except in the group’s case, it represents the “Threat level posed by the federal government to the citizens of the United States.”

With the first cup of coffee this morning, about the only thing I could come up with – that would make group membership the least bit contentious included:

First, they are actively growing

We all know government hates competition for authority, especially when all politics (so seems the mindset) should be covered by the traditional republican and democratic parties. 

Of course, to hold to his view is being demonized, especially since corporations have effectively bought the major parties, and thanks to the K Street Mafia – those Superpacs and all – the real power in America has be moving away from Main Street and into the boardroom.  

Secondly, the group actively discusses “Security” and this may be an area where the government is particularly sensitive to competition. 

After all, why would everyday citizens need to band together to provide (and I quote from the MPP website) “Security Development, Training and Deployment in Personnel, Area or Operation and Parameter Security.”

In case no one has noticed, although it hasn’t escaped notice of people in Mississippi, apparently, the US is in a low-intensity war with Mexico. 

Just this week there have been reports that our country has been (wink-wink) backing the Sinaloa drug cartel and that Fast & Furious was part of a much larger picture. 

Something that goes back to the Bush days, apparently.

Just because our own government sent guns to violent drug gangs – and some weapons come back into the US where they are used against civilians…why that shouldn’t cause any alarm, should it?

Curiously, the MPP could be looked at as something little more than a slightly scaled-up version of the highly successful Block Watch program.

But perhaps the third reason has something to do with the Mississippi Preparedness Project’s marketing. 

Is DHS concerned about a “trade dress” issue?

Maybe those suspected of violating the Lanham Act can’t fly…from Wikipedia:

In the U.S., like trademarks, a product’s trade dress is legally protected by the Lanham Act, the federal statute which regulates trademarks and trade dress.

[2] Trade dress protection is intended to protect consumers from packaging or appearance of products that are designed to imitate other products; to prevent a consumer from buying one product under the belief that it is another.

[3] For example, the shape, color, and arrangement of the materials of a children’s line of clothing can be protectable trade dress (though, the design of the garments themselves is not protected),

[4] as can the design of a magazine cover,

[5] the appearance and décor of a chain of Mexican-style restaurants,

[6] and a method of displaying wine bottles in a wine shop…” 

Or, in the case of the MPP: they might have set off a tripwire by referring to five pillars. 

You see Islam have five pillars, too:  Kalima, Salat, Zakat, Sawm of Ramadan, and Hajj. 

Maybe having five pillars set off security…just no telling. 

But seems visiting Saudis are allowed to fly – despite all of the 9/11 perps coming from their. 

Perhaps Mississippi just doesn’t produce enough oil.  My head scratching continues.

Still, a check of the US Trademark office doesn’t show any active trademarks covering use of “Five Pillars” for either religion or community organizing.

I’m pretty sure there is more to the story than meets the eye: 

Perhaps there’s some perceived danger from this fellow because he might talk about an Okinawa Preparedness Project or something like that.  

Still, it would be very useful if the people behind the mysterious “No Fly List” would kindly explain the logical contradictions they themselves are presenting. 

The government’s own www.ready.gov website urged people to:

  • Volunteer to support disaster efforts in your community. Get trained and volunteer with a Community Emergency Response Team, Medical Reserve Corps unit and/or other Citizen Corps Partner Program or Affiliate organization. Many local faith-based and community organizations have programs active in supporting disasters too. View more volunteer opportunities.

  • Be part of the community planning process . Connect and collaborate with your local emergency planning group, Citizen Corps Council or local emergency management agency.Contact nearest planning organization.

  • Join or start a preparedness project. Find an event or identify local resources, build a team, choose a project, set goals and serve your community by improving the preparedness of your friends, colleagues and neighbors. Get started.

  • Support major disasters by donating cash or goods which may help meet the needs of your community in times of disaster.

     Learn more.

Right there – on the federal’s own website says Join or star a preparedness project…

Like I said, there’s probably more to the story.  Besides, even if there isn’t, we’ll never know.

Although prepping is not a political issue, I expect there were be even more of a crackdown on independent preparedness groups once we’re past the election. 

Whether the government actually comes out and says it, there appears to be an emerging marketing battle between genuine grass-roots groups and government sponsored/endorsed/controlled groups. 

Indeed the “officially” sanctioned Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) do good things…no doubt about it. 

But should joining a “non-sanctioned” group be cause to be grounded in the middle of the Pacific?

For now, this is a “soft” campaign. 

Once elections are finished, I predict a much harder line will be taken. 

It may go so far as to turn into “The New McCarthyism” because there are factions within both politics and government which would love nothing more than to turn some of that fancy new intelligence equipment and capabilities on common citizens.

I want you to pay very close attention to developments on this front: 

No-flying a fellow is Hawaii may not seem like a trend…but only if you’ve managed to forget the case of Brandon Raub, a former US Marine whose Facebook pages got him landed in a psych ward for 30-days without trial!

Luckily for him, he was released on orders from Circuit Judge W. Allan Sharret who had the good sense to flag the government-ordered commitment as illegal.

America is in a difficult time now: 

We’re in denial about living next door to a narco-state which we depend on for gasoline and food. 

And at the same time, we don’t seem to have a problem with Saudi Arabia getting nuclear weapons from Pakistan.

More and more, we’re an intolerant nation where failing to keep mental lock-step is becoming a crime. 

That’s how fascism comes to power…slowly…by inches and degrees.  

I’m reading a book at the moment which is extremely revealing about how such social declines work. 

It’s called Hitler’s Second Book: The Unpublished Sequel to Mein Kampf

Madness comes slowly to a country and there’s only fine lines of division between terms like Hitler’s “Lebensraum”, McCarthy’s “Reds”, and “domestic terrorism.” 

Yet, at first, it seemed to make sense…there was some core of truth before countries went nuts.

National Madness (and socialism) takes about 12-years to ramp up, or at least it did in Hitler’s time. 

Demonetization rolls out slowly, picks up compliant, unquestioning supporters who are unable to maintain independence of judgment. 

Then it gets about it’s real business:  Squashing of free thought.

Since, as I’ve pointed out, we’re in a major economic depression, masked by  artificial creation of paper scrip – that paints over the real decline in America’s standard of living – the new social demons will be not be Muslims, gays, minorities, or anything like that. 

We’ve busily enshrined these as “protected classes.”  

Instead, we’ll be going after independent thinkers – especially those doers –  that pose the great danger:

People who actually store food, work spontaneously together to defend and protect, and do other dangerous things.

Like founding countries – the United States – for example.   Or voting independent.



14 US Governors Prepare State Militia Defenses, To Be Ready Against Obama’s Rogue Federal Forces!


9/11 , Afghanistan , IRAQ , Libya , Syria and IRAN all one big scam ( Documentary )

From 12160.info

Posted by J. Patriot on October 18, 2012


1. Qaddafi wouldn’t bow down to the Rothschild central reserve banking cartel.

2. Qaddafi Proposed $400 million African Satellite – Qaddafi alone came up with $300 million for this project.

For those ask whats the big deal in it, it’s really a huge set back for European western countries, because they get paid by Africa every year $500 million per year in rent for the services European satellite provides to Africa.

Africa being self sufficient is definitely a set back for western economy.

3. AMF: African Monetary Fund – No more borrowing from Rothschild Central Bank for African countries, AMF was planned to produce its own currency for Africa, backed by Gold standard.

Interest free.

4. Libya’s $300 Billion Gold reserves.

5. Libya sits on Africa’s largest oil and natural gas reserves.

6. Qaddafi planned to free the entire African continent from the clutches of Western imperialism.

7. Libya’s Blue gold – Libya’s priceless water basins.


* In Libya there are four major underground basins, these being the Kufra basin, the Sirt basin, the Morzuk basin and the Hamada basin, the first three of which contain combined reserves of 35,000 cubic kilometers of water.

These vast reserves offer almost unlimited amounts of water for the Libyan people.

*In the 1960’s during oil exploration deep in the southern Libyan desert, vast reservoirs of high quality water were discovered in the form of aquifers.

* thus Qaddafi started the construction for the Phase I of the $25 Billion “Great Man made River Project” in 1984.

The Great Man-Made River (GMR) is a network of pipes that supplies water from the Sahara Desert in Libya, from the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System fossil aquifer.

It is the world’s largest irrigation project.

As of now, almost all three phases has been finished by the Libyan administration .

It carries more than five million cubic meters of water per day across the desert to coastal areas, vastly increasing the amount of arable land.

The cost of one cubic meter of water equals 35 cents. The cubic meter of desalinized water is $3.75.

Scientists estimate the amount of water to be equivalent to the flow of 200 years of water in the Nile River.



” I have even more respect for this man after seeing this film! “~~~J. Patriot


GM Wheat May Damage Human Genetics Permanently

From Waking Times

By Heidi Stevenson – October 18, 2012
Waking Times

The Australian government, in the form of its science research arm, is joining Agribusiness profiteering by designing a GM wheat that could kill people who eat it & be inherited by their children.

We have not yet seen the worst damage that genetic engineering may do. Australia’s governmental agency, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), is developing a wheat species that is engineered to turn off genes permanently.

Professor Jack Heinemann at the University of Canterbury’s Centre for Integrated Research in Biosafety  has studied the wheat’s potential.

Digital Journal reports that he says1:

What we found is that the molecules created in this wheat, intended to silence wheat genes, can match human genes, and through ingestion, these molecules can enter human beings and potentially silence our genes.

The findings are absolutely assured. There is no doubt that these matches exist.

The implications are clarified by Professor Judy Carman of Flinders University:

If this silences the same gene in us that it silences in the wheat—well, children who are born with this enzyme not working tend to die by the age of about five.

Silencing the equivalent gene in humans that is silenced in this genetically modified wheat holds the potential of killing people.

But it gets worse. Silenced genes are permanently silenced and can be passed down the generations.

Silenced Genes

The wheat genes involved are called SEI.

The specific sequences of those genes are being termed classified confidential information.

CSIRO, which is part of the Australian government, is developing a commercial application, but refuses to divulge the information that’s most significant to the people of Australia!

The government is apparently more interested in profits than in the people’s safety.

Dr. Heinemann was asked to provide his opinion of CSIRO’s genetic engineering on wheat plants and produced the report “Evaluation of risks from creation of novel RNA molecules in genetically engineered wheat plants and recommendations for risk assessment”2

He discusses the nature of the genetic entities that are being played with and explains how they can affect human health.

RNA is similar to DNA, which is the molecule that carries genetic inheritance.

There are several types of RNA, but a particular group called double stranded RNA (dsRNA) is of concern.

Heinemann writes:

dsRNAs are remarkably stable in the environment. Insects and worms that feed on plants that make dsRNA can take in the dsRNA through their digestive system, where it remains intact.

He delineates research documenting that once dsRNA is taken through an animal’s skin or digestive tract, it can wreak havoc.

It circulates throughout the body and has been known to be amplified or cause a secondary reaction that:

… leads to more and different dsRNAs (“secondary” dsRNAs) with unpredictable targets.

Heinemann points out that a silencing effect on a gene, once initiated, can be inherited.

Though it’s known to happen, little is yet known about the process.

dsRNA is known to be a tough molecule. It survives readily, even through digestion.

Worse, though, it’s known to pass into the body through digestion.

Then, as Dr. Heinemann writes:

Once taken up, the dsRNA can circulate throughout the body and alter gene expression in  the animal.

That is, gene expression can be altered as the result of eating a food with dsRNA altered by genetic engineering.

Judy Carman, of Flinders University, who also provided an expert opinion, wrote in “Expert Scientific Opinion on CSIRO GM Wheat Varieties”3:

In fact, employees from the world’s largest GM company, Monsanto, have written at least one paper about how to commercially exploit the fact that dsRNA survives digestion in insects, in their attempts to try to control insect pests of plants.

That is, the plant is genetically engineered to produce a dsRNA, which insects ingest when they eat the plant; the dsRNA survives digestion in the insect and then silences genes in the insect to stunt its growth and kill it.

There can be no question that dsRNA can be transferred to humans by eating.

The Risks

Heinemann makes these three points:

  1. Plant-derived microRNA [a type of dsRNA] precursors have been detected in human blood, thus demonstrating that they can survive the human digestive tract and be passed into the body through it.

    He emphasizes: “There is strong evidence that siRNAs [a type of dsRNA and the one of particular concern here] produced in the wheat will transfer to humans through food.”

  2. dsRNA that have been shown to transmit to humans through food have also been shown to survive cooking!

    He points out: “There is strong evidence that siRNAs produced in the wheat will remain in a form that can transmit to humans even when the wheat has been cooked or processed for use in food.”

  3. Plant-derived dsRNA was able to silence a human gene in cultured cells.

    He wrote: “There is strong evidence that once transmitted, siRNA produced in wheat would have the biological capacity to cause an effect.”

Judy Carman states succintly:

As a result, there is a chain of evidence to show that there is a risk that the dsRNA from this GM wheat may survive digestion, enter the tissues of people that eat it and silence a gene or genes in those people.

There is also evidence that any genetic changes so produced may be stable and become established in many cells of an organ.

Furthermore, there a possibility that these changes may be passed-on to future generations.

The wheat genes involved are called SEI.

They have extensive similarities with the human GBE gene, which controls glycogen storage.

If the GBE gene is defective, it leads to certain death from liver cirrhosis at a very young age. Another defect in the gene results in adult polyglucosan body disease (APBD) in adults over age 40, causing cognitive impairment, pyramidal quadriplegia, peripheral neuropathy, and neurogenic bladder.

Dr. Heinemann investigated and found that sections of the two genes, SEI and GBE, are a perfect match.

Because CSIRO is saying that the specific SEI sequence that’s modified is classified confidential information, we cannot know for certain what harm might be done to humans.

However, it’s obvious that shutting down a section of the GBE gene holds the potential of death—yet, Heinemann showed that it’s not only possible, it’s likely!

Lack of Adequate Risk Assessment

Judy Carman focused more on the lack of appropriate or adequate risk assessment for the modified wheat.

She is very concerned that no consideration was given to checking for:

  • Whether there are adverse effects on animals or humans who eat it.

  • Whether there is any uptake of dsRNA in animals or humans who eat it.

  • Silencing of genes in animals or people.

  • Silencing of the branching enzyme.

  • Toxic effects, such as damage to the liver, kidneys, or any other organ.

  • Increase in reproductive problems.

  • Whether dsRNA changes are inherited.

  • Increased risk of cancer.

  • Increased risk of wheat allergies

She is very concerned that the oversight agency, the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), and CSIRO “appear not to be looking for any adverse effects in people, but intend to go directly to look for any benefits.”

She concludes:

It appears that neither organisation has appreciated or properly safety assessed this wheat in the light of the fact that the dsRNA produced in these GM wheat varieties may survive digestion, enter the tissues of the body and silence a gene or genes in the recipient.

It also appears that neither organisation has “joined the dots” to appreciate that, of all the genes that could be silenced, the most likely one is a similar branching enzyme in animals and people and that silencing it could seriously impair or even kill those that eat it.

The Australian government appears to have become nothing more than another Agribusiness corporate entity.

They’re using the people’s money to fund a massive profit-making venture in genetic engineering without any consideration for the potential harm that may be done to either the environment or the welfare of the people.

Not only are they willing to risk mass deaths from products they’re hoping to put on the market, they also seem to have no concern for whether they might be doing permanent damage to generations that follow.

Resources :

  1. Scientists: New GMO wheat may ‘silence’ vital human genes

  2. Evaluation of risks from creation of novel RNA molecules in genetically engineered wheat plants and recommendations for risk assessment

  3. Expert Scientific Opinion on CSIRO GM Wheat Varieties


    CONTENT OF BRANCHED STARCH MOLECULES, Appraisal of statements by Prof Jack Heinemann and Assoc Prof Judy Carman

  5. The GMOs, nature and effect of the genetic modification

  6. GBE Antibodies

About the Author :

Heidi Stevenson is Allopathy’s Gadfly. She’s an iatrogenic survivor whose prior career in computer science, research, and writing was lost as a result.

She has turned her skills towards exposing the modern medical scam and the politics surrounding it, along with providing information about the effectiveness of much alternative medicine, without which she would not be here today acting as Allopathy’s Gadfly.

Find her work on GaiaHealth.com

This article originally appeared at GreenMedInfo.com, an excellent source of news and information about natural health and wellness. 


(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012 Danimartextras


3 Responses to “REAL NEWS Oct.19 2012”

  1. Винон – электротовары и светотехника в Мурманске…

    […]REAL NEWS Oct.19 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


  2. Willie said

    you are in reality a just right webmaster. The web site loading speed is incredible.

    It sort of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick.
    Moreover, The contents are masterwork. you have performed a excellent
    process in this subject!


  3. Printers Antwerpen…

    […]REAL NEWS Oct.19 2012 « DaniMartExtras, Too[…]…


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: