DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

REAL NEWS Nov.29 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on November 28, 2012

The Occasional REAL NEWS in ‘ MY NOW OCCASIONAL ‘ attempt to awaken the Sheeple : November 29, 2012

===============================================================================================

====================================

AIPAC, decapitators inside US government: Intelligence analyst

Is Obama signing a  new law to kick out all Zionist agents from Congress, Military and The White House,

or is this just a bigger power grab ?

Xaniel wants to know and I’m sure you do too !!

 

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on November 25, 2012 by # 1 NWO Hatr

Press TV

At the time of this writing, while on Air Force One, President Barack Obama issued a press release that has been utterly ignored by the Western Press.~~(AS USUAL !!)~~~Xaniel777

The president has openly announced a move against violent plotters inside the US government and espionage agents. He does not use the terms “AIPAC” or “the Israel lobby” but it is highly unlikely he could be referring to anything else.

In fact, we can think of no other group.

I was privately briefed on some of the reasons behind this document.

On what is known, not “surmised,” I will explain:

There is, currently, within the US military, the Executive branch of government and among extremist “power brokers” in America an active plot to “alter” America’s form of government through “decapitation.”

Let me be clear. Where the memo, printed in full below, refers to “violent”, it means “assassination” of many top leaders in America including but not limited to the President, Vice President, Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and others.

The plot makes use of the resources of major private defense contractors and their intelligence and special operations personnel.

There has been active recruiting that has been noted and is why the memo was released and why many members of the military have been subjected to investigation.

The Benghazi attack was planned and financed by this group.

Many writers in the alternative media have noted much of what is going on but not all.

Some have shown access to very knowledgeable sources.

Behind the plotters are drug cartels that have penetrated the US government, former lobbyists who were moved into government during the Bush (43) administration and now are suspected of being involved in a coup attempt.

There is no direct evidence tying any foreign government to this plot though most are “fanatically” aligned with the militant Likudists in Israel under Netanyahu’s regime.

The President’s text below, unedited:

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
November 21, 2012

Presidential Memorandum — National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs

Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies

Subject: National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs

This Presidential Memorandum transmits the National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs (Minimum Standards) to provide direction and guidance to promote the development of effective insider threat programs within departments and agencies to deter, detect, and mitigate actions by employees who may represent a threat to national security. These threats encompass potential espionage, violent acts against the Government or the Nation, and unauthorized disclosure of classified information, including the vast amounts of classified data available on interconnected United States Government computer networks and systems.

The Minimum Standards provide departments and agencies with the minimum elements necessary to establish effective insider threat programs. These elements include the capability to gather, integrate, and centrally analyze and respond to key threat-related information; monitor employee use of classified networks; provide the workforce with insider threat awareness training; and protect the civil liberties and privacy of all personnel.

The resulting insider threat capabilities will strengthen the protection of classified information across the executive branch and reinforce our defenses against both adversaries and insiders who misuse their access and endanger our national security.

Barack Obama

A very real threat to world stability

To some, at a glance, this might actually sound like a response to leaks within the CIA and White House except for some extraordinary language.

Please make very special note of the following:

“…to deter, detect and mitigate actions by employees who may present a threat to national security…These threats include…violent acts against the Government and the Nation…”

Please note that they refer to “violent acts” and speak of both the “government” and “nation.”

By “government,” they are indicting, with no “wiggle room,” assassination plots.

By “nation,” they may well be referring to false flag terrorism that may well include use of weapons of mass destruction.

Britain was subject to such a threat during the London Olympics, one that would never have been successfully overcome without the help of journalists who put themselves at great risk.

Espionage

The US government has had a twelve-year moratorium against arrest and prosecution of spies within our government and military other than those who can be tied to China.

The most famous Chinese “spy” was Wen Lee Ho, a nuclear scientist at Los Alamos Labs. He was arrested in 1999, held in solitary confinement for a year and then released.

In order to get an accurate picture I phoned two friends, one a senior FBI counter-intelligence operative and the other a very senior US Army intelligence officer.

The question I put before them, while eating breakfast, was:

“Please list the nations that represent the greatest threat of espionage against the United States and, which nations, in order, are believed to represent the “penetration threat” that President Obama is referring to.”

From the FBI, their appraisal not intended for the “pop culture” media:

“Our greatest direct threat is Israel and the Israel lobby. They have systematically penetrated every aspect of government and the military and, if they cannot get documents from those branches, friends in congress will give them access to anything that branch has available.

After that is India, with every research facility at risk from RAW (Indian Intelligence) penetration and then Cuba, Mexico and Turkey.

The primary end users of this intelligence, the “clients,” are Russia and China.”

From the US Army:

“I agree with Israel and the rest but we have not had Turkey on our radar. The obvious end users are, of course, Russia and China based on capability.

The issue I have is how a presidential press release, an extraordinary and almost “draconian” document has gone without an uproar from congress and wide press coverage.

Who has the power to suppress reporting on something like this, though, I know that you will say it is Israel, I would want proof.

Though there has been no official notification of this, I am of the impression that we now consider any mention of Israeli spying to be highly classified.

Only Russia and China are officially listed, entirely out of concern not to offend lobbyists whose feelings outweigh real issues of national security.”

Then I turn on my television, hour after hour of TV shows about espionage and terrorism. Both American and British TV are the same.

All spies are from Iran and Pakistan; nations that our actual intelligence agencies indicate represent no espionage threat to speak of.

In fact, in my two Saturday morning phone interviews, which can, of course, be confirmed by Homeland Security who has tapped my phones, I have reflected with great accuracy.

Thus, we ask you to read what President Obama really did not say “between the lines,” the message is quite clear.

We do not see a roundup of AIPAC spies, not like in the early days of the Bush administration although Attorney General John Ashcroft quashed that investigation.

What we are seeing is a hunt for traitors within the American government and military, some of which is working its way onto the news.

The question of the moment, however, is this:

How can a President of the United States announce that the government is infiltrated with terrorists and spies and no newspaper, television network or other form of media notices?

GD/JR/IS

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/11/24/274332/aipac-decapitators-inside-us-govt/

=======================================================================

END

======================================

Presidential memo on insider threats: Why now?

Obama waits in a tent before a rally at the Rochester Commons in NH, August 2012.

Obama waits in a tent before a rally at the Rochester Commons in NH, August 2012.
Credits: Callie Shell via DailyKOS

From examiner.com

NOVEMBER 28, 2012 – BY: GREGORY PATIN

On the day before Thanksgiving with little or no media attention, President Obama wrote a memorandum, which is an unofficial directive, to the “heads of executive departments and agencies” that addresses “insider threats.”

While the corporate media has largely ignored this memo, there has recently been much speculation in alternative media as to why Obama felt the need to address insider threats at this time.

The subject heading of the memo is National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs.”

It is short enough to reprint in its entirety:

This Presidential Memorandum transmits the National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs (Minimum Standards) to provide direction and guidance to promote the development of effective insider threat programs within departments and agencies to deter, detect, and mitigate actions by employees who may represent a threat to national security.

These threats encompass potential espionage, violent acts against the Government or the Nation, and unauthorized disclosure of classified information, including the vast amounts of classified data available on interconnected United States Government computer networks and systems.

The Minimum Standards provide departments and agencies with the minimum elements necessary to establish effective insider threat programs.

These elements include the capability to gather, integrate, and centrally analyze and respond to key threat-related information; monitor employee use of classified networks; provide the workforce with insider threat awareness training; and protect the civil liberties and privacy of all personnel.

The resulting insider threat capabilities will strengthen the protection of classified information across the executive branch and reinforce our defenses against both adversaries and insiders who misuse their access and endanger our national security.

BARACK OBAMA

Much of the speculation regarding this memo is a result of the brevity and ambiguous wording.

For example, what exactly defines an “insider threat” and why are “violent acts against the Government or the Nation” mentioned?

Recent events raise even more questions.

After a closer look at some of the theories regarding why Obama felt the need to write this now, readers can draw their own conclusions.

Stifling whistleblowers

This memo obviously urges an expansion of powers granted to the Insider Threat Task Force that was created by an executive order in October 2011, ten months after Army Private Bradley Manning retrieved roughly 250,000 diplomatic cables from a government computer and turned them over to Wikileaks.

Bradley Manning is facing hearings this week that could lead to him being imprisoned for life, after already being imprisoned is solitary confinement since May 2010.

If that is not enough of a deterrent for whistleblowers in the military, what is?

Jesselyn Radack, writing for the DailyKOS, correctly points out that this memo “serves to reinforce the Obama administration’s woeful confusion of whistleblowing with espionage [and]…is completely redundant as agencies already have internal policies on classified information and secrecy agreements.”

Radack continues to advance the theory that the memo is meant to stifle whistleblowers like Bradley Manning, Thomas Drake and John Kiriakou.

Yet she once again correctly notes that “the memo equates disclosure of classified information with ‘violent acts against the government’ and ‘espionage,’ a certainly inapt and chilling comparison considering that…an employee taking violent acts to overthrow the government or conducting espionage…is a rare occurrence whereas classified information appears on the front pages of national newspapers daily.”

In fact, the New York Times pointed out last year that anywhere from 50 percent to 90 percent of classified documents could safely be made public.

Kevin Gosztola, who has been following the Bradley Manning case, appeared on RT with a similar assessment (see video). “During the clip, I point out the policy is extraneous as it is already official policy for national security agency employees to not release classified information without proper authorization. This adds another layer of procedures meant to chill speech and whistleblowing.”

Gosztala takes it one step further when writes, “it is an indication that the Obama administration, which prosecuted more whistleblowers or leakers in the past four years under the Espionage Act than any other previous administration, has a disposition against the free flow of information.”

It is quite possible that Obama wrote the memo with Manning’s case and other whistleblowers in mind, yet many speculate that there is much more to it.

Obviously, none of these whistleblowers were plotting violent acts against the nation and it is a safe assumption that a President who is an ex-constitutional law professor can make a distinction between whistleblowing, espionage and violent acts against the nation.

Expansion of executive powers

Beginning with the Bush administration, there has been a rapid expansion of executive powers in government and the Obama administration has continued that trend with unprecedented bills such as the National Defense Authorization Act (S.1867) and the Federal Restricted Building and Grounds Improvement Act (HR 347).

It is a legitimate concern that the insider threat memo is a directive authorizing a further expansion of executive powers.

David Hagmann, writing for the Canada Free Press, makes some good points when he interprets Obama’s memo in a broader perspective.

Like others, he points out the ambiguity in the wording and acknowledges that it could just be geared at stopping leaks.

Hagmann, however, takes note of a key word in the memo.

The word is “centrally,” and when it is considered in the context of Obama’s agenda seen being implemented over the last four years, it is chilling:

The key to understanding this memorandum is to understand that we are witnessing the greatest consolidation of power and control under the Executive branch of the government in recent U.S. history.

This process creates a closed system of surveillance that cannot be easily penetrated by other branches of…government.

Accordingly, it becomes a self-policing network that has the ability to silence critics and individuals opposing a particular agenda or activity, even if such dissent is lawful…it gives Barack Hussein Obama the ability to redefine what constitutes a threat to the government, including treason. 

It is he, not laws enacted by congress or the workings of the judicial branch, who will now determine who and what constitutes an ‘insider threat.’

It is the very essence of ‘Big Brother’ within the government itself. Everyone needs to wake up and understand exactly what’s happening not only in the U.S., but across the world. We are witnessing the consolidation of power that historically precedes a war for absolute control.

Hagmann’s analysis encompasses the stifling of whistleblowers and takes it a step further to the stifling of any dissent within government agencies.

Like Gosztala and Radack, he acknowledges the ambiguity in the wording.

Unlike both, however, he fails to mention that the mechanisms for stifling whistleblowers and any form of dissent were already in place before this memo was written.

So, the question still remains, why would Obama feel the need to write this memo now?

Real insider threats

The words “violent acts against the government or the nation” have rang the alarm bells of several writers who have covered this memo.

Most seem to think they are out of context with the insider threats vaguely described in the memo. But that may not be the case.

President Obama may be beginning to feel threatened by not only people within his administration, but also by people in this country.

One context to put that into is that President Obama has received more death threats than any President in U.S. history.

At least two blogs have referenced Secret Service sources that say death threats to the President have increased by over 400 percent since Obama took office in 2008 and amount to about 30 per day.

That’s 43,830 death threats for his first four years alone.

Of course, that is impossible to verify because the media and not even the President is made aware of all threats against him.

As the Secret Service says, “the sheer number would be overwhelming and, frankly, distracting.”

Combined with the recent shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, the spike in gun sales after the election, and many who have signed petitions for secession, the words “violent acts” and “insider threats” make more sense.

Some writers, such as Gordon Duff writing for Press TV, have gone as far as to claim that Obama’s memo may be a preemptive response to an Israeli assassination attempt or an effort by AIPAC-backed groups to overthrow the U.S. government.

Whether or not real threats of violence are from domestic insiders or foreign infiltrators, they cannot sit well with any President regardless of party affiliation.

As usual, the truth probably lies somewhere in between.

The question then becomes, in between what?

A simple silencing of whistleblowers or preventative measures against an assassination and/or overthrow of the U.S. government?

Neither one seems good for Americans right now.

Sources:

White House web site (whitehouse.gov)

Text of Memo (pdf)

GovInfoSecurity.com

fas.org – Executive Order 13587

Mother Jones

DailyKOS

whistleblower.org

defendjohnk.com

New York Times

firedoglake

14 defining characteristics of fascism: The U.S. in 2012

NDAA (S.1867) pdf

opencongress.org (HR 347)

Canada Free Press

Salon.com

Petitions from 50 states to secede from the U.S.

Press TV

=================

, Madison Independent Examiner

Gregory Patin earned a B.A. in political science from U.W. – Madison and a M.S. in management from Colorado Technical University. He is currently a free lance writer residing in Madison, WI who considers himself politically independent.

=======================================================================

END

======================================

Gun BAN APPROVED by UN & Signed by Obama

From InvestmentWatch

November 27th, 2012

Second presidential debate: Assault weapons ban

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50133288n

Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out

http://americannationalmilitia.com/obamas-gun-ban-list-is-out/

Turn Them Over: Feinstein Moves To Ban ALL Assault Rifles, High Capacity Magazines, and Pistol Grips

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/turn-them-over-feinstein-moves-to-ban-all-assault-rifles-high-capacity-magazines-and-pistol-grips_11072012

 

UN APPROVAL: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs//2012/dc3389.doc.htm SIGNED BY OBAMA

 

Black Friday Gun Sales Hit New Record High

Black Friday gun sales hit an all time record high last week with demand for new firearms so overwhelming that it caused outages at the FBI background check center on two separate occasions.

Fueled by fears that the Obama administration will go after gun rights during a lame duck term, the FBI reported 154,873 background check requests on Friday – a 20 per cent increase on last year’s record total of 129,166 checks.

The number of guns sold could actually be double or more that figure because only one background check is recorded per sale even if buyers purchase multiple firearms.

“With the recent election, some people are making buying decisions just in case something (new law) happens,” Don Gallardo, manager of Shooter’s World in Phoenix, told USA Today.

http://www.infowars.com/black-friday-gun-sales-hit-new-record-high/

========================================================================

END

=================================

PLO Rejects US Demand to Prohibit War Crimes Charges Against Israel

The US pushed Palestine to add a clause in UN bid barring war crimes charges against Israel. What are they afraid of?

 

 

Antiwar.com

From AntiWar.com

by John Glaser, November 27, 2012

The Palestinians have refused demands from Washington that it soften the wording of the proposed United Nations resolution regarding the recognition of a Palestinian state.

According to Haaretz, “the push did not succeed because the Palestinians refused to add a clause to the draft that would prevent them from filing criminal charges against Israeli officials at the International Criminal Court in The Hague.”

Israel, backed by the US, has objected to the Palestine Liberation Organization’s (PLO) bid at the UN, claiming formal recognition of Palestine needs to happen through negotiations, instead of happening unilaterally at the UN.

But the the defunct peace process has proven over the decades to be a scheme to provide Israel with more time to colonize and annex additional Palestinian land.

Israel does not want a Palestinian state on the internationally recognized borders of pre-1967.

They don’t want a state at all.

Part of the reason is ideological: Zionists have intended to gain permanent sovereignty over the West Bank since the establishment of Israel.

But another reason is more immediate: if Palestine is a state, that means it can bring Israel to court for war crimes.

A secret State Department diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks revealed that one of the primary reasons behind Israeli objections to Palestinian statehood is that lack of statehood keeps Palestinian territories outside the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

The US-Israeli effort to get the PLO to include a clause prohibiting Palestine from bringing Israel to court for war crimes is revealing: if they truly believed Israel hadn’t committed war crimes, such an effort wouldn’t be necessary.

Last 5 posts by John Glaser :

==========================================================================

END

=======================================

Israel: The last surviving heirs to the dreadful racist heritage

 

 

From SABBAH Report

by Lawrence Davidson on 11/28/2012

Genocidal Yearnings :

Israel: The last surviving heirs to the dreadful racist heritage

Some History :

By the middle of the 19th century the multi-ethnic empire was on its way out as the dominant political paradigm in Europe.

Replacing it was the nation-state, a political form which allowed the concentration of ethnic groups within their own political borders.

This in turn formed cultural and “racial” incubators for us (superior) vs. them (inferior) nationalism that would underpin most of the West’s future wars.

Many of these nation states were also imperial powers expanding across the globe and, of course, their state-based chauvinistic outlook went with them.

 was born in this milieu of nationalism and imperialism, both of which left an indelible mark on the character and ambitions of the Israeli state.

The conviction of Theodor Herzl, modern Zionism’s founding father, was that the centuries of anti-Semitism were proof positive that Europe’s  could not be assimilated into mainstream Western society.

They could only be safe if they possessed a nation state of their own.

This conviction also reflected the European imperial sentiments of the day. 

The founders of modern Zionism were both  and Europeans, and (as such) had acquired the West’s cultural sense of superiority in relation to non-Europeans.

This sense of superiority would play an important role when a deal (the Balfour Declaration) was struck in 1917 between the  and the British Government.

The deal stipulated that, in exchange for Zionist support for the British war effort (World  I was in progress), the British would (assuming victory) help create a  national home” in .

It was no oversight that neither side in this bargain gave much thought to the Palestinian native population. 

Years later, beginning in 1945 (at the end of World War II), the British were forced to officially give up the imperial point of view.

They came out of this war with a population burdened by extraordinary high war taxes.

Retaining the empire would keep those taxes high and so the British voter elected politicians who would transform the empire into a commonwealth, granting independence to just about all the Britain’s overseas territories.

One of those territories was Palestine.

It is interesting to note that in other colonies, where large numbers of Europeans resided, the era following World War II saw their eventual evacuation as power shifted over to the natives. 

Kenya and Algeria are examples which show that this process was hard and bloody, but it happened.

And when it did happen, the official imperial mind set was defeated.

That does not mean that all Europeans (or Westerners) saw the light and ceased to be racists, but that their governments eventually saw the necessity to stop acting that way. 

Some Consequences :

Unfortunately, in the case of Palestine, this process of de-colonization never occurred.

In this case the European colonists did not want the imperial mother country to stay and protect them.

They wanted them out so they could set up shop on their own.

They got their chance after the British evacuated in 1947. 

Soon thereafter, the Zionists began executing a prepared plan to conquer the “Holy Land” and chase away or subjugate the native population.

And what of that imperial point of view which saw the European as superior and the native as inferior?

This became institutionalized in the practices of the new Israeli state.

That made  one of the very few (the other being apartheid South Africa) self-identified “Western” nation states to continue to implement old-style imperial policies: they discriminated against the Palestinian population in every way imaginable, pushed them into enclosed areas of concentration and sought to control their lives in great detail. 

If one wants to know what this meant for the evolving character of Israel’s citizenry who now would live out the colonial drama as an imperial power in their own right, one might take a look at a book by Sven Lindqvist entitled Exterminate All The Brutes (New Press 1996).

This work convincingly shows that lording it over often resisting native peoples, debasing and humiliating them, regularly killing or otherwise punishing them when they protest, leads the colonials to develop genocidal yearnings.

There is evidence that the Zionists who created and now sustain Israel suffer from this process.

For a long time Israeli government officials tried genocide via a thought experiment.

They went about asserting that the Palestinians did not exist.

The most famous case of this was , who on June 15, 1969 claimed that “there were no such thing as Palestinians ….They do not exist.”

One of the reasons she gave for this opinion was that the Arabs of Palestine never had their own nation state. 

Sponsored by:

Israel: The last surviving heirs to the dreadful racist heritage

Buy Palestine T-Shirt from Sabbah Store

See more Palestine T-Shirts

Others took a different approach by denying not so much the existence of Palestinians, but rather their humanity.

At various times and in various contexts, usually in response to acts of resistance against , Israeli leaders have referred to the Palestinians as “beasts walking on two legs” (); “grasshoppers” (Yitzhaq Shamir); “crocodiles” (); and “cockroaches” ()

Of course, these sentiments were not confined to the Israeli leadership.

They soon pervaded most of the Zionist population because the old imperial superiority-inferiority propaganda had become a core element of their basic education.

The Israelis have taught their children the imperial point of view, augmented it with biased media reporting, labeled the inevitable resistance offered by the Palestinians as anti-Semitism and took it as proof of the need to suppress and control this population of “Others.”

And, from the Zionist standpoint, this entire process has worked remarkably well.

Today all but a handful of Israeli Jews dislike  and fear the people they conquered and displaced.

They wish they would go away.

And, when their resistance gets just a bit too much to bear, they are now quite willing to see them put out of the way.

Israel: The last surviving heirs to the dreadful racist heritage

Thus, during the latest round of resistance rocket fire from  and the vengeful killing that came from the Israeli side, we heard the following:

“We must blow  back to the Middle Ages destroying all the infrastructure including roads and water” (, present Deputy Prime Minister);

“There should be no electricity in Gaza, no gasoline or moving vehicles, nothing….We need to flatten entire neighborhoods…flatten all of Gaza” (journalist  in the Jerusalem Post);

“There are no innocents in Gaza. Mow them down…kill the Gazans without thought or mercy.” (, member of the );

Gaza should be “bombed so hard the population has to flee into Egypt” (, present Minister of Transportation);

Gaza should be “wiped clean with bombs” (, present Minister of Home Front Defense);

Israeli  must “learn from the Syrians how to slaughter the enemy” (prominent Israeli  );

and then finally there were the numerous, spontaneous demonstrations of ordinary Israeli citizens, both in the north and south of the country, where could be heard chants and shouts such as “They don’t deserve to live. They need to die. May your children die. Kick out all the Arabs.” 

Israel: The last surviving heirs to the dreadful racist heritage

If it wasn’t for the fact that the outside world was watching, there can be little doubt that the famed Israeli armed forces would have been tempted to do all that these ministers, clerics and citizens wished.

After Prime Minister  agreed to a cease fire, a group of Israeli soldiers showed their frustration by using their bodies to spell out (in Hebrew) the words “Bibi Loser” (Bibi is a nickname for Netanyahu).

It was a pre-arranged photo-op and the picture can now easily be found on the web.

What seems to really irk the Israeli citizenry is not that Bibi killed and maimed too many innocent Palestinian civilians, but rather that he did not kill and maim enough of them to grant Israelis “safety and security.” 

 

Conclusion :

Throughout history it has been standard operating procedure to demonize those you fight and demote to inferior status those you conquer.

But as Lindqvist’s work shows, there was something different about the way Europeans went about this business.

The deeply racist outlook that underlay modern imperialism made it particularly perverse.

Now that apartheid South Africa is no more, the Israelis are the last surviving heirs to that dreadful heritage.

So much for a “light unto the nations.”

That proposition has quite failed.

Wherever the Israelis and their Zionist cohorts are leading us, it is not into the light, it is to someplace very very dark.

Article by Lawrence Davidson | © | Sabbah Reporthttp://sabbah.biz/mt/?p=15667

================================

About Lawrence Davidson

Lawrence Davidson is professor of history at West Chester University. He is the author of numerous books, including Islamic Fundamentalism and America’s Palestine: Popular and Official Perceptions from Balfour to Israeli Statehood.

==================================================================================

END

=========================================

Israel’s Attack on the USS Liberty Cover Up – (2) Full Documentaries

 

 

From Charleston Voice

Posted by Charleston Voice – November 25, 2012

Originally Published by Charleston Voice, 06.08.12

Israel attacks America to cover-up its War Crimes

Due to the fact that the entire mainstream media (MSM) is owned by the Israeli Zionists, the American public is not aware that Israel is the biggest threat to American national security, and many believe that Israel is in fact at war with America and has colonized and occupied it just like the Palestine.

The apartheid state of Israel’s unprovoked attack on The USS Liberty, the assassination of a true human rights & peace activist, the honorable Rachel Corrie are just a few examples of Israel’s war against America.

Would the US allow its citizens to be attacked and killed by a foreign power and then cover up the facts?

It would – and it has.

On June 8th, 1967, the Israeli military attacked and attempted to sink the USS Liberty as she sailed under a US flag in international waters.

Thirty-four US servicemen were killed and 171 injured by a well-coordinated, multi-wave assault which included the use of napalm.

The Israeli military called the attack a “tragic mistake” and then-President Lyndon Johnson agreed it was nothing more.

Sailors who were aboard the ship were warned not to disclose the facts of what happened that day under penalty of court martial – or worse.

Sinking Liberty: Who will write the final chapter on Israel’s 1967 confrontation with the U.S. Navy?

Excellent Related YouTube (1 hr.): “Documentary on the USS Liberty: Dead in the Water”

Related Posts :

You might like :

==========================================================================

END

========================================

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012 Danimartextras

Advertisements

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: