(Natural News) America has become a zombie nation of hypnotized, socially-obedient conformist who are so disconnected from reality that when the bombs start falling, they won’t have any idea how they’ve been programmed to celebrate it all. Heavily dosed with medication, fluoride and heavy metals in vaccines, the American masses have become sleepwalking automatons… conformist consumers of hilariously fictional propaganda parading around as “real news” on CNN, which has now resorted to displaying staged photos of maimed children to invoke the necessary reactionary emotional support to demand WAR.
Yet the snowflake zombies who pretend to be interested in global justice for children have no idea how they’re being insidiously manipulated. They don’t even really know what war looks like. They’ve never lived through war, witnessed war or dealt with the aftermath of war. And they’ve never, of course, been bombed with nukes or blown to pieces by a Tomahawk missile, so the physical reality of all this seems hopelessly remote to them all. “War” is something that happens to other people in far away lands, they believe, not here at home among the snowflake social justice Zombiellenials at UC Berkeley.
It is with this sense of sheer oblivion that the American masses are sleepwalking toward World War III. Even as Russia has mastered the development of Mach-nine cruise missile “ship destroyer” missiles while China is deploying satellite killing ground-based laser systems that can take out most of the military logistics infrastructure in mere hours, the American people live out their days under the delusional impression that nothing bad can ever happen here. This is America, after all. Nobody bombs us! WE do the bombing to THEM, not the other way around.
The American masses are oblivious to how they’re being manipulated
America is a deluded nation obsessed with celebrity fashion, sports, food, entertainment and recreational drugs. Almost nothing that passes through the minds of most Americans is rooted in reality. It’s all twisted narrative, social conformity and sheer delusion pretending to be “fact-checked” news. So as the world marches toward a global nuclear conflict with very real consequences, the average American “consumer” — that’s the most accurate term at this point for the mindlessness of the masses — is far more easily swayed by the photo of a chemical weapons-damaged child than by the physical facts involving hydrogen bombs and the half-life of radionuclides. The idea that America’s present actions could lead us to a nuclear conflict that might make vast regions of America uninhabitable for three centuries has never occurred to the common person.
The rest of us — that’s you and me — therefore find ourselves living among a global suicide cult called “humanity,” where the delusional mob celebrates the very actions that are leading us toward global nuclear disaster. “Washington’s military attack on Syria is unambiguously a war crime,” writes Paul Craig Roberts, a former Reagan administration official. “It occurred without any UN authorization or even the fake cover of a ‘coalition of the willing.’ Washington’s attack on Syria occurred in advance of an investigation of the alleged event that Washington is trying to use as its justification. Indeed, Washington’s story of Syrian use of chemical weapons is totally implausible. All chemical weapons were removed from Syria by Russia and turned over to the US and its European allies. Syria has no such weapons and has no reason to use them and every reason not to.”
The provocation has already thrust America into an escalation that risks an outbreak of global nuclear war. Via Zero Hedge:
A statement issued on Sunday by a joint command centre consisting of forces of Russian, Iran and allied militia alliance supporting Syrian President Bashar al Assad said that Friday’s US strike on the Syrian air base crossed “red lines” and it would “respond with force” to any new aggression while increasing their level of support to their ally.
Meanwhile, tech giants like Facebook are so committed to the total destruction of the human race that they’re now banning sharing of most posts across the entire independent media, banishing any ideas that question the laughably fake narratives of the status quo. What’s left on the table for online consumers to swallow is nothing more than mainstream fake news, the purpose of which is to keep the zombies spoon fed with enough emotionally-charged propaganda so that when war is unleashed, they’ll cheer.
WAR as the ultimate cover story for the coming financial collapse
But why would a nation’s leaders want the outbreak of war that might bring harm to their own citizens? One answer is found in the realization that the financial deep state is engineering a global debt collapse to be blamed on President Trump. The trigger has already been pulled with the raising of interest rates, and this will be continued (or even accelerated) until the desired tipping point is reached that pops the world’s obscene financial bubbles (bomb market bubble, real estate bubble, stock market bubble, derivatives debt bubble, etc.).
As former president George Bush demonstrated years ago, the only sure way to get the public behind you with near universal support is to insert the nation into a global military conflict where America can be positioned as occupying the moral high ground while America’s enemies are depicted as vile, child-murdering bastards who unleash chemical weapons onto innocent children. Once the bombs start flying, the zombies begin cheering (and the polls start rising). The corporate-run media cheers you, too, as ratings explode while Americans pop beer cans and open bags of Cheetos to sit on their couches, cheering the “reality TV” war unfolding on their screens with missile-tip video feeds of entertaining mayhem (carefully sanitized to avoid any on-screen blood from civilian casualties in enemy territory, of course).
Only during a war can a corrupt, dishonest regime stay in power while suffering a systemic financial collapse that strips the masses of their savings and pensions. The best way to prevent people from marching in the streets is to paint anti-government resistance protesters as “unpatriotic.” If you don’t support the war, the narrative goes, you’re anti-American. And besides, your protests might even be a threat to national security, so cracking down on such protests is easily justified when the nation is at war.
The best way to start a war? Unleash a radiological false flag in a U.S. city
The best way to start a war is, of course, to attack your own people and blame it on the enemy. I have little doubt that right now, the military industrial wing of the deep state is planning nothing less than a radiological false flag attack to be staged in a major U.S. city. That doesn’t mean it has to be a nuclear detonation, by the way. It could involve a conventional explosive that disperses a radiological dirty bomb scrapped together from old medical imaging equipment, for example (with strontium-90).
Just as the totally faked “sarin gas chemical weapons” photos from Syria caused a wave of instant support across the mainstream media for retaliatory attacks, all it will take is a few photos of Americans dying from radiation poisoning to evoke the kind of national outrage that justifies endless war with whatever named enemy is said to be responsible.
Oh, you didn’t know the “sarin gas” chemical weapons photos from Syria were faked? Check out the photo below, which we are told shows a rescue worker handling a sarin gas victim child using his BARE HANDS.
If you know anything about sarin gas, you know the guy would have been dead in about two minutes. You don’t handle sarin gas residues with your bare heads and live to tell about it, even if the body was rinsed with water:
As usual, the propagandists pushing all the false flags and staged justifications for war don’t know anything about real science, and they forgot to properly stage the scene with protective gear that would be consistent with their fake news story.
The deep state may be manipulating President Trump
President Trump, by the way, may not be aware of any of this false flag fakery. It’s highly likely that Trump is being played by the same deep state that played President Bushover “weapons of mass destruction.” Same playbook, different administration.
Facts be damned, however, when there’s a WAR to be justified. War is the state’s ultimate expression of extreme anger, so it makes sense that anger must first be evoked in the minds of the masses. There’s no better way to accomplish that than to parade pictures of maimed children across TV screens, demanding the nation’s masses either join in the anger or be labeled unpatriotic. It’s almost as silly as North Korea’s government goons making their citizens cry at gunpoint following the death of Kim Jong-Il, the late father of the current lunatic in power, Kim Jong-Un.
Speaking of lunatics in power, the deep state military industrial complex that’s scripting everything you’re seeing right now in Syria is run by high-level lunatics who are willing to do anything to stay in power. If you thought the 9/11 attacks were suspiciously timed to unleash the Patriot Act surveillance state that led to the very kind of illegal surveillance that now targets us all, your Spidey sense has nailed it. Every war is exploited to expand the power of the State… and when wars don’t materialize on their own, events can be easily staged to hurry them along. The goal is always the expansion of state power combined with increased subservience of the obedient masses.
How the military industrial “deep state” tells itself false flags are necessary to protect the nation
In defense of the military industrial complex, the world really is full of dangerous geopolitical predators like Kim Jong-Un, communist China, the Russian government and so on. Protecting America from those dangerous regimes requires a powerful military. Yet the pacifist people of America won’t support anything even resembling national defense unless they are emotionally hijacked into it. Although I’m not defending this practice, the military industrial complex believes it is justified in setting up false flag theatrics because otherwise, the American people would never support a sufficient expansion of military power, leaving the United States vulnerable to attack.
Thus, in their minds, they are only staging false flag events as a way to wake people up to the very real larger threats that America faces on the global stage. To some degree, they have a point: Your average UC Berkeley college campus snowflake crybully pacifist has no clue about reality and probably isn’t even qualified to participate in a constitutional Republic. In the same way that clueless gun control proponents think that banning guns will stop “gun violence,” they also believe that if America eliminates its military, the world will suddenly turn to peace. Neither argument holds up under the slightest scrutiny.
The truth is that the world really is dangerous place, and most of the world’s population continues to live under tyranny rule in places like China, Venezuela, Iran, Russia and even parts of the European Union. A powerful military really is necessary for national defense, since the only thing countries like China really understand is the use of force. That’s how they keep their own citizens in line, after all. In China, domestic diplomacy is always carried out at gunpoint. America’s nuclear arsenal truly is the only thing preventing us from being invaded right now by the Communist Chinese or the Russians, as force is the only thing most governments understand. That’s why America’s nuclear submarines are, in a very real sense, the “guardian angels” of national defense. Without them, some lunatic communist regime like China might be tempted to try a first strike against America’s land-based ICBM launch sites.
Make no mistake: The military industrial deep state tells itself they are ultimately doing what’s right for America. But the American people are too dumbed down and pacifist to understand the real world around them, so they have to be manipulated into supporting a powerful, dominant military that polices the world. That’s why they see killing a few children as a “necessary evil” for what they tell themselves is the “greater good” of protecting the nation as a whole.
Pick your narrative and believe what you want… we’re still sleepwalking toward World War III
The conclusion in all this? Pick your favorite narrative and hope you’re right. Maybe you believe that really was sarin gas used on children in Syria by Assad. You’re probably incredibly gullible if you believe that, but then again most American are living in a delusional reality, so you’ll fit right in.
Or perhaps you believe it was a false flag operation run by the military industrial deep state. I would tend to agree with you on that analysis, but it doesn’t mean the march toward war can be stopped with any greater degree of success. Being right doesn’t mean we can do anything about it.
No matter what you make of current events, we’re all being marched toward World War III. It’s no accident, either. The powers that be have decided they need war right now to accomplish (or cover up) other political or economic goals. War is not the destination but rather the means to an end. To accomplish that end goal, the American people are about to be subjected to the most elaborate “news theater” any of us has ever witnessed. As all this unfolds, fictions will be broadcast across our screens that seduce us into expressing the emotional reactions desired by those running the theatrical performance across the world stage.
Rest assured that the bigger the emotional reaction, the larger the support for war. Almost by definition, this means that the next false flag event targeting an American city must achieve extreme emotional outrage across the national psyche, and this can only come from murdering innocent children.
Here’s a quiz for those of you who are old enough to know what’s really going on: Why do you think the Oklahoma City federal building was chosen for the staged bombing in 1995 under the Clinton regime? Because it had a day care center, of course, and photos of bloodied children carried the narrative across the entire media (which had no competition at the time, because there was no independent media to counter the fake news of CNN).
What happened to the children of Oklahoma City in 1995 and what happened to Syrian children in 2017 are exactly the same thing. Children were deliberately targeted so that pictures of dead children could be used for maximum emotional impact. Anyone who doesn’t recognize this is blind to the reality of how governments shape propaganda for maximum social impact. (Clinton used the Oklahoma City bombing, of course, to immediately demand nationwide gun control in an effort to disarm the citizenry, a tactic that was repeated by Obama with Sandy Hook.)
Here’s EXACTLY what’s going to unfold, step by step, with near perfect scripting
As a final note, the deep state doesn’t even care that I’m telling you all this. The emotional triggering of dead children is so powerful at a visceral level that it overpowers all rationality. Once dead children start being paraded across CNN, nobody even cares whether it was all scripted in advance. Images of dead children bypass all rationality in the human mind, creating precisely the response that’s desired (widespread emotional support for more war).
Recognizing this, I’m resigned to the fact that the American sheeple are so cognitively malleable that there’s nothing that I or any other independent media journalist can say to stop this unfolding of unfortunate events. Like clockwork, it’s already scripted and set in stone:
A huge false flag attack on U.S. soil (or a large U.S. military base) that’s blamed on a targeted foreign enemy
Photos of dead children paraded across the TV screens to invoke emotional reactions
A massive outcry and emotional reaction from the mindless public which abandons all reason
A denouncement of the selected “enemy” by the President and a commitment to defeat them
90% approval rating of the President in the polls
The passing of more laws to surveil more Americans in order to “fight terrorism”
The rapid expansion of the police state and “martial law LITE”
The building up of the military for a retaliatory invasion
The rise of American patriotism, complete with flag waving and blind obedience to government
The highly entertaining, televised “war” – reality TV “entertainment” for the masses
The “victory” against the enemy as the invasion succeeds
The incessant reminder that you need government to protect you even while it’s enslaving you
And the cycle repeats about every 25 years or so, which is just long enough for the next generation to forget what happened a generation earlier. It all unfolds according to a roughly 25-year schedule:
Persian Gulf War: 1990 – 1991
Vietnam War: 1954 – 1975
World War II: 1939 – 1945
World War I: 1914 – 1919
And now, World War III is unfolding right on time, almost exactly 25 years after the Persian Gulf War, and just as the American empire desperately needs to remind its citizens how much they need a powerful, domineering, surveillance regime in order to be kept safe while the economy collapses all around them.
All we can do is prepare and survive this… we cannot halt the cycle of mass manipulation and human gullibility
Personally, I’ve resigned myself to the fact that you can never educate enough people about reality to stop these cycles. The sheeple are imminently predictable and easily manipulated by the emotional imagery of false flag theatrics. All we can really do as aware, informed and rational people is prepare for what’s coming and survive it.
The sheeple will always be suckers for every new generation of war. We cannot awaken them sufficiently to compete with the emotional power of staged events. All we can really do is prepare ourselves and our loved ones to survive World War III. The mindlessness of the human race knows no bounds, which is precisely why I’ve begun calling humanity a SUICIDE CULT.
Your job (and mine) is to simply survive the next round of mass suicide that’s about to be triggered by the insane governments that still rule over our planet. “Democide,” as its called, means “death by government,” and it exterminated 262 million lives over the last century of so. That number is about to get much, much larger. Your primary goal at this point should be to make sure you don’t join that statistic.
If you want to live through all this, bookmark this website right now. It’s one of the very few places where you’re going to connect with intelligent, informed and honest analysis about what’s really going down (and why).
Make Censored.news the first website you check every day, and use GoodGopher.comas your search engine for independent media news. With Google, Facebook, Twitter and other internet gatekeepers now censoring all REAL news in order to push their FAKE news narratives, these are websites of choice for staying informed as WWIII unfolds.
This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyper link is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.
This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House. ~~~ Xaniel777
MacDonald then goes on to give an extensive quote by the author of the Tablet magazine article, Clarissa Sebag-Montefiore (pictured), in which the young Jewish writer does her best to pooh-pooh the whole idea that Jews control America.
When someone with the name “Sebag-Montefiore” pens an article, the world has to sit up and pay attention. This is because the Montefiores belong to one of the most venerated Jewish families in England—the crème de la crème of British Jewry—the other great Jewish families in England being the Rothschilds, the Sassoons, the Freuds, the Joels, the Neubergers, and the Harts.
Ms Sebag-Montefiore is clearly at pains to convince the Chinese—who she knows will be reading her article with avid interest—that any such idea of Jewish power in America is a maliciousanti-Semitic canard.
The Jews, she would like to persuade the Chinese, have at best a marginal influence on American affairs. True, it’s often alleged by people who ought to know better that Jews own the media and Hollywood, but these silly assertions have to be taken with a pinch of salt. The Chinese, with their high intelligence, will see through these specious claims—or, in Ms Sebag-Montefiore’s predictable parlance, “entrenched stereotypes.”
Henry Ford would of course have another view on all this. Writing almost 100 years ago, he said: “Controlling the world’s sources of news, Jews can always prepare the minds of people for their next move.
Here is Ms Sebag-Montefiore doing her valiant best to persuade the Chinese into viewing the Jews through rose-tinted Jewish spectacles:
“Do the Jews Really Control America?” asked one Chinese newsweekly headline in 2009. The factoids [note the dismissive word “factoids”] doled out in such articles and in books about Jews in China—for example: “The world’s wealth is in Americans’ pockets; Americans are in Jews’ pockets”—would rightly be seen to be alarming in other contexts. But in China, where Jews are widely perceived as clever and accomplished, they are meant as compliments.
Scan the shelves in any bookstore in China and you are likely to find best-selling self-help books based on Jewish knowledge. Most focus on how to make cash. Titles range from 101 Money Earning Secrets From Jews’ Notebooks to Learn To Make Money With the Jews.”
And now for the flattery: the attempt to prove that Jews and Chinese are kindred spirits under the flesh, united by common ideals and noble aspirations:
“The Chinese recognize, and embrace, common characteristics between their culture and Jewish culture. Both races have a large diaspora spread across the globe. Both place emphasis on family, tradition, and education. Both boast civilizations that date back thousands of years. In Shanghai, I am often told with nods of approval that I must be intelligent, savvy, and quick-witted, simply because of my ethnicity.”
Without waiting to finish the article—I was to race through it later that day—I posted this comment on my website:
“Though it is obvious to all of us that theJews control America, it astonishes me that they still keep pretending they don’t! They appear to be concerned right now that the Chinese might get the “wrong idea” that they control America! They would obviously like to dupe the Chinese into thinking they are pretty harmless.”
To this comment I received a thought-provoking response from writer Franklin Ryckaert, a veteran commenter on Kevin MacDonald’s The Occidental Observer: “It wouldn’t astonish you if you knew about what is called ‘aggressive mimicry’, which is defined thusly : ‘Aggressive mimicry is a form of mimicry in which predators, parasites or parasitoids share similar signals with a harmless model, allowing them to avoid being correctly identified by their prey or host.’” (Seehere)
“Jews are parasites who want to exploit, control and eventually destroy their host,” Ryckaert went on to explain, “but because they are everywhere a small minority they must resort to certain strategies so as not to be identified and expelled.
First of all they do that by hiding their identity (assuming non-Jewish names, “converting” to another religion etc.) and by staying as much as possible in the background (as “adviser” of a leading figure but not as the leader himself). Secondly they project the image of themselves as harmless, powerless or even as oppressed and persecuted. Hence the stress on the Holocaust story.
This is why the Jews don’t want to be seen by the Chinese as in total control of America. China is their next host and they need to be seen as harmless.”
Ms Sebag-Montefiore’s entire article founders on that one withering sentence:“CHINA IS THEIR NEXT HOST AND THEY NEED TO BE SEEN AS HARMLESS.” A penetrating comment, without a doubt, though not exactly flattering to our Jewish cousins.
“Well, let’s hope the Chinese are smart enough to avoid the fate of the Americans. America is now little more than a slave colony dominated by Jews. That the Americans were unable to learn from history—from the complete takeover of Germany and Russia by the Bolshevik brigade—is a sad reflection on the American character.
Didn’t they see it coming? If they did, it seems they weren’t too bothered: like the English who threw in the towel long ago and were quite happy to accept serfdom under the Jews: (a) provided it was dressed up as “democracy”, and (b) provided the loot was divided up in such a way that the gentile aristocracy were not excluded from a place at the pig’s trough.
The Brits and the Americans, you could say, were willing to make a Faustian pact with the Jews: that as long as the Jews made a certain percentage of them rich, letting them be part and parcel of the predator elite, there would be no complaints. Hollywood is a case in point, and wherever celebrities like Madonna are manufactured. Fabulous wealth is showered upon these non-Jewish degenerates as long as they serve their elite masters faithfully.
I’m not sure the Chinese will be any more successful than our Western countries in resisting the wiles of the Jews. Bribery and blackmail may well do the trick. The important thing is to keep the masses sedated. As long as the slaves are allowed to think they are in control and are made to enjoy their slavery, life will go on.
This quote by Aldous Huxley says it all: “A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, becausethey love their servitude.”
Franklin Ryckaert agreed. He expressed the hope that the Chinese, for their own sakes, would be a bit smarter than the dopey Americans who had allowed themselves to be sold down the river.
“We can only hope that the Chinese will be able to avoid being corrupted by the Jews. Their high intelligence, realism and traditional values might be of help, but we must also keep in mind that they already have been once victims of the destructive ideology of Communism, which is Jewish after all. Under Communism the Chinese repudiated their traditional values, condemned Confucianism as “feudal” and during Mao’s Cultural Revolution even destroyed centuries old art treasures. If one Jewish ideology could subvert them once, another one could do it for a second time.”
Kevin MacDonald goes on to quote Ms Sebag-Montefiore again, this time about media control. She seems inordinately anxious to persuade the Chinese that the whole concept of Jewish control over the media is an anti-Semitic canard to which even the Chinese (sigh sigh) appear to have succumbed.
“Just before my visit to Nanjing,” she points out plaintively, “the Chinese tycoon Chen Guangbiao made international headlines by publicly announcing his ambitions to buy the New York Times and later the Wall Street Journal. In a TV interview heexplainedthat he would be an ideal newspaper magnate because “I am very good at working with Jews”—who, he said, controlled the media.”
“Who, he said, controlled the media.”
Note the cunning way that’s put. Poor Chen, it seems to suggest, has somehow gotten the silly idea that Jews control the American media! Where on earth did he get such a bizarre idea from? Oy veh, do grow up already Mr Chen, you silly-billy Chinese billionaire!
The flamboyantly generous Chen Guangbiao (pictured), one of China’s 400 richest men, flew into America a year ago and announced to everyone’s surprise his wish to buy up the New York Times. Apparently the Jewish shareholders refused even to meet him to discuss the proposition and his bid was scorned (cartoon pic).
He then said he wanted tobuy up the Wall Street Journal,another Jewish-owned newspaper. With engaging chutzpah, he had said he would like to give these Zionist papers “more balance”— a comment which doubtless caused considerable alarm in cosmopolitan circles.
Failing to make any headway in acquiring unbalanced American newspapers, Cheng finally consoled himself with throwing aslap-up lunchin Central Park for 250 homeless New Yorkers
A pity the Chinese billionaire was not allowed to give “more balance” to the Jew-owned mass media by smashing through their monopoly—something that has led to the complete zionization of America in anIsraelified police stateand the crippling psychological jewification of the American people.
THE JEWISH OWNED MEDIA
Here is a famous quote from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion on Jewish media control, a book which acclaimed Norwegian Professor Johan Galtung, author of 100 books and more than 1000 scholarly papers, heartily recommends to readers in spite of its bad reputation as a “forgery”. (Seehere). Galtung was particularly impressed by this quote on the media from Protocol 12:
“Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies …. These agencies will then be entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them. If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the goy communities to such an extent that they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the coloured glasses of those spectacles we are putting astride their nose.”
Kevin MacDonald concludes his essay on Chinawith a veiled warning to the Chinese not to pay too much attention to Jewish doubletalk, as represented by the honeyed phrases dripping from the pen of Ms Sebag-Montefiore:
“Honest discussions of Jewish power and influence—whether it’s the Israel Lobby, Hollywood and the media, Wall Street, or immigration and multiculturalism—are to be made off limits, not only in the U.S., where there is an elaborate, lavishly funded infrastructure to ensure it, but also in China where Jewish money is already having a major effect on the boundaries of legitimate discussion.
China as a rising power would do well to view Jews through the lens of realism and empirically based discussion. As elsewhere, however, there are already forces that are pushing in the opposite direction.”
We have so far devoted this essay to the prospect of a Jewish takeover of China. The entire idea, admittedly, seems ridiculous on the surface. Ms Sebag-Montefiore would turn up her nose and dismiss it all as a “wild-eyed conspiracy theory.” She has been at great pains, as we have pointed out, to persuade the Chinese that if Jews should ever come to China in ever-increasing quantities in the foreseeable future they will be doing so as friendly and altruistic do-gooders.
Never mind that every single country to which the Jews came in the past was beset with innumerable problems soon after their arrival.. Never mind that they have beenexpelled from 109 locations from the year AD 250. Never mind that they have been perceived and stigmatized throughout history as unmitigated pests. Never mind that over 60 millions Russian Christians were put to death by them in the Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin in the gulags and cheka dungeons. Never mind that they have now taken over America. This time it will be different. Totally different.
But wait—hold on!—perhaps we need not worry too much about the Chinese being taken over. It seems they are already aware of the Jewish bid for world domination. Far from being unduly concerned about being taken over, some of them have already begun to talk about modeling Chinese behavior on Jewish strategies for attaining wealth and power.
They want to study the Talmud, incredibly, to see if the wise rabbis of ancient times have any hot tips on how to make them as stinking rich as the Jews! And while they are about it, why not make a close study of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to see what ingenious ideas these clever Jews have to offer on World Domination?
It sounds almost like a Swiftian satire. Enough to give the genteel Ms Sebag-Montefiore a fainting fit. Heck, if the Jews can take over America, why can’t we Chinese have a bash at it too!
Here is Professor Xu Xin addressing an American audience. Listen to him carefully. Is he serious or is he pulling our legs?
“I think it is obvious that Jews control the Western world. They run your media, universities, and much of your government. They tell you who to wage war on, who to fight, who to support and how to spend your money. This is what we Chinese want to understand when we study Jewish dominance and hegemony of the West.
There are literally so many instances of how you have fallen for Jewish tricks. Hitler was the last person to openly contest Jewish rule and look how he is viewed. He is hated because of what Jews taught you with their films and books.
We Chinese are amused at how gullible white men are. We want to find the same way to shape your thoughts. This is why we study them, the Jews.”
Fun times ahead! What with the Jews chatting up China, like the Big Bad Wolf playing nice with Goldilocks … and with the Chinese half-jokingly planning to study the Talmud and the Protocols with a view to taking over America from the Jews.
Part 2 : Opium, Sex and Death
It is a sad and sobering fact that the Jews are already deeply entrenched in China and have been been so for centuries. As an erudite China watcher on my site was quick to point out recently, the sinofication of Jewish names was already underway during the time of the Ming Emperors several centuries ago:
“During the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644), a Ming emperor conferred seven surnames upon the Jews, by which they are identifiable today: Ai (艾), Shi (石), Gao (高), Jin (金), Li (李), Zhang (張), and Zhao (趙); sinofications of the original seven Jewish clans’ family names: Ezra, Shimon, Cohen, Gilbert, Levy, Joshua, and Jonathan, respectively. Interestingly, two of these, Jin and Shi, are the equivalent of common Jewish names in the west: Gold and Stone.” (Seehere)
Jews had in fact arrived in India via the Silk Road almost 1000 years ago, well before Marco Polo made his way to the Court of the Grand Cam (Khan) in distant Cathay (China) in the late 13th century. Waves of Jews were to follow them in subsequent centuries until China finally acquired its own thoroughly assimilated Jews, the Kaifeng Jews, indistinguishable from the Chinese. Iraqi Jews, Jews taking flight from Russia, Jews fleeing the Nazis in their tens of thousands, all these came flooding into great melting pot of Shanghai.
There were even high-profile Jews in the Chinese Communist Party, including the American Jew Sidney Rittenberg and the journalist Israel Epstein. (Seehere)
The shameful opium trade in China, into which the easily corrupted Brits were drawn by Rothschild money, was in fact the brainchild of a British sephardic Jew, Elias David Sassoon. He was joined in this ignoble enterprise by another British Jew, Silas Aaron Hardoon, his partner in the firm E.D. Sassoon & Co.
The origin of the conflict between China and the Rothschild-backed East India Company—i.e., the Jew-ridden nucleus of the British Empire—can be found in this bland statement about theFirst Opium War:
“In the 17th and 18th centuries, the demand for Chinese goods (particularly silk, porcelain, and tea) in the European market created a trade imbalance because the market for Western goods in China was virtually non-existent; China was largely self-sufficient and Europeans were not allowed access to China’s interior….
The British East India Company had a matching monopoly of British trade. [It] began to auction opium grown on its plantations in India to independent foreign traders in exchange for silver.
The opium was then transported to the China coast and sold to Chinese middlemen who retailed the drug inside China. This reverse flow of silver and the increasing numbers of opium addicts alarmed Chinese officials.”
To deconstruct and simplify:
Europe wanted tea, silk and porcelain from China, but China was self-sufficient and needed nothing in exchange from Europe. The result was a trade deficit in which Britain (via its East India Company) owed China an enormous and increasing amount of silver.
How did Britain try to solve this tricky problem? It left it to the Jews who formed the nucleus of the East India Company to come up with a neat solution.
The East India Company began to grow opium on its Indian plantations. It then transported the processed opium to Bombay and Calcutta where the crop was sold by auction to “independent foreign traders.” This innocuous phrase—“independent foreign traders”—needs translation. It is of course a euphemism for Jewish merchants.
There were not only swarms of British and European Jews in India at this time, concentrated mostly in the port cities of Bombay and Calcutta, but an entire community of Indian Jews: namely, the Cochin or Malabar Jews (see thispicture) who had made their home at the southernmost tip of India from earliest antiquity.
The Jewish merchants who had bought the opium in India then shipped it to China on their opium clippers where it was exchanged for silver from “Chinese middlemen”—most of whom were Kaifeng (Chinese)Jews—another fact that has been carefully concealed by our politically correct court historians. These Chinese Jews thereupon proceeded to distribute the opium all over China, causing an epidemic of opium addiction among Chinese of all classes, ranging from the elite landowners and mandarins to the lowestcooliesandrickshaw pullers.
As for the silver received from the sale of the opium, this not only helped to narrow the British trade deficit with China but enriched the East India Company’s vast army of officials, many of them Jews.
This, then, is how the British Empire became so powerful: by winning two Opium Wars with the help of Rothschild money. (The First Opium War: 1839-1842; the Second Opium War: 1856-1860). The Brits grew rich on Chinese tea, Chinese silk, Chinese porcelain, and acquired Hong Kong on a 99-year lease. And on this they built their Empire, with the help of the mercantile Jews.
What did China get in exchange? — Millions of opium addicts. By 1905, it has been calculated, 27 percent of Chinese males had become addicted to opium, with “13.5 million peopleconsuming 39,000 tons of opium yearly.”
When we look back at the British Empire, and the part played by Jews in bringing it to the pinnacles of wealth and power, we cannot but help reflecting on Balzac’s famous epigram: “Behind every great fortune lies a great crime.”
OPIUM WAREHOUSE IN INDIA (1850)
This iconic image of an opium warehouse is a lithograph produced by Bengal Commissioner Lt. Col. Walter S. Sherwill. The production and distribution center was located in Patna, India. Here 13 million pounds of opium juice were processed in giant vats and compacted into sticky, grapefruit-sized balls (see picture above), the workmen being expected to roll 100 balls a day. These were then placed in chests and sent to Bombay and Calcutta, from where they were shipped out to Canton in China. (For more details, seehere)
Here is amapshowing the route from the opium warehouses in Bombay and Calcutta to Canton in China. And here is achartshowing the huge growth of British opium exports to China between 1729 and 1832. Thereafter, trade was to improve spectacularly as the number of Chinese addicts soared to over 10 million.
Did the British care? Apparently not. Growing rich on the sufferings of others, as all predator nations know, is the iron rule of life. It’s known as the Survival of the Fittest. The Jews were indisputably the driving force behind this evil trade, as today they are behind the evil pandemic of porn addiction. Then it was opium, now it is pornography. New addictions for new ages.
Curiously enough, opium dens often doubled as brothels.
Among other things—painkiller, anesthetic, stupefacient, hypnosis inducer, euphoria giver—opium was also a powerful aphrodisiac and had been associated with sexual performance since the 16th century. According to Chinese physician Li Slizhen, writing in his Compendium of Materia Medica (1578), opium had the ability to confer extra stamina and staying power during intercourse, since it had the ability to “arrest seminal emission.”
Gorgeous young Russian girls and slant-eyed Asiatic Jewesses were available for sex in the opium dens of Shanghai. These sordid dens of vice where emaciated men poured their semen into the voracious vaginas of opium-addicted girls—for whom sex was a way of paying for their next opium fix—spread to the great Western cities: to Paris, London, Berlin, New York, and San Francisco. By the late 19th century, there were 200,000 opium addicts in the United States,three-quarters of them women.
Here (see the Punch cartoon below) is how the jingoistic Brits, under their Jewish mentors, treated the Chinese in the heyday of the British Empire. The Chinese would do well to remember these past humiliations and do their utmost to keep the old colonialists raptors out of their country.
We have now learned a valuable history lesson. The Chinese intelligentsia today are doubtless acquainted with these basic facts. They too must know who their historical enemies are.
If they have any doubts, let them open their history books and a litany of Jewish names will spring from those musty pages, the names of all the Jews who helped to plunder their ancestors via the British Empire: Elias David Sassoon and Silas Aaron Hardoon, partners in E.D. Sassoon & Co, as already mentioned above, in addition to Edward Ezra, Morris Cohen—described by the South African Sunday Express in 1945 as “the guiding genius behind the War Lords of China”—Jacob Borodin (aka Grusenberg),Trebitsch Lincoln (British MP), BK Galen (aka Chesin), Skidelski, Gekker, Koslowsky, Snamensky, MD Lashewitz, WN Levitscher, A Joffe, R. Haas, JB Rajchman, Ben Kizer.
All these names will be found in an essay written by Arnold Leese, a notorious anti-Semite, so maybe he shouldn’t be taken too seriously when he concludes his exposé,The Jewish Rotting of China, with these shocking words:
“Every key position in the process of the Bolshevik destruction of China has been Jewish.”
The prospects for the world do not look good. We are not talking here any longer about the “takeover” of China by the Jews. As Franklin Ryckaert, with his astute observation on aggressive mimicry might say: “The parasites have already taken control of the host’s body.”
When the time is right, I predict, the Jews will jump ship en masse and make China their next cash cow and kleptocracy—but not before they have destroyed America, leaving behind a Third World country in ruins.
Here, in this multicultural hell pit of existential despair, the remnants of the white race will have to put up with rape and murder on an unprecedented scale, like the Russians and Germans in the first half of the 20th century at the hands of the same Bolshevik Jews.
The sun is setting on the American Empire and night is about to fall, like the blade of an axe on the neck of the bleating lamb.
This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777
Contrary to the beliefs of “mainstream economists” like Paul Krugman will like to create.
What war does do is unite the populace around the State, and make them more forgiving of tough economic times.
How many people in the ’1940′s would have accepted the idea of rationing if it wasn’t for the “greater good” of defeating those evil Nazis and Japanese?
Of course, the idea that the U.S. government would go to war for less than noble reasons has long been the relegated to the territory of fringe “conspiracy theories” associated with the likes of Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster.
But the age of information is changing that , as the concept of false flags are becoming more and more accepted as a conspiracy fact.
It is also now known that the Gulf of Tonkinincident that led to the invasion of Vietnam never even happened.
Whether they simply “wait” for an event to happen as in the case of Pearl Harbor or completely manufacture it as in the case of the Gulf of Tonkin, the point remains the same.
When the Government wants a war, they will look for the reasons to get into it. And it only takes one easy step: Create An Enemy.
One would think that in the Age of YouTube, those that would falsely lead us into war would be a bit more careful about what they say and when they say it.
See below the video of Patrick Clawson, who heads the Washington Institute’s Iran Security Initiative, responding to a question about what should happen if negotiations with Tehran fail.
Israel Lobbyist suggests False Flag attack to start war with Iran
Poor Patrick seems a bit upset that “crisis initiation is very tough”.
He then proceeds to name all of the events over time that have justified the United States going to war from the Fort Sumter incident that started justified Lincoln’s initiation of the American Civil War all the way up to the aforementioned Pearl Harbor and Gulf of Tonkin incidents.
Clawson goes on to discuss how a war with Iran could be initiated, while trying to do his best Jackie Mason impression:
“Sometimes Iranian submarines periodically go down. Some day one of them might not come up. Who would know why?
We can do a variety of things if we wish to increase the pressure.
I’m not advocating that, but I’m just suggesting that this is not a either/or proposition of just sanctions have to succeed or other things. We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians.
We could get nastier at that”.
Ah, I see.
Clawson isn’t advocating a false flag, he is merely suggesting that maaaaaybe it might be something to consider before just flat out saying the U.S. is currently using “covert means” to plan such a thing.
What a standup guy!
The only way to prevent something like this from occurring is to make people more aware of the possibility.
Because however it starts, a war with Iran will have much broader global implications and many believe it could lead to a Third World War.
With the newly minted 2013 NDAA being prepped to fully legalize a war with Iran coupled with statements like these from people in the know, it’s certainly something we need to be wary of.
You can’t have free speech and Zionism, Mr. President!
Editor’s note: “There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents,” Mr. Obama told the General Assembly.
Mr. President, that is precisely what American missiles and drones have been doing in Libya, Yemen and Pakistan — “killing innocents” and American missiles and weapons are being used by Israel for decades to “kill innocents” in defenseless Lebanon and Palestine.
Indeed! there are no words that excuse the killing of innocents sir!
As theNew York Times put it, “President Obama used his last major address on a global stage before the November election to deliver a strong defense of America’s belief in freedom of speech, challenging fledgling Arab and North African democracies to ensure that right even in the face of violence.”
My challenge to the president is this. “When you are back in the White House for a second term, will you do whatever is necessary to ensure that all Americans (Congressmen and women especially) can enjoy the right of free speech even in the face of the Zionist lobby’s offensive to suppress it?”
Alan Hart is a former ITN and BBC Panorama foreign correspondent who has covered wars and conflicts wherever they were taking place in the world and specialized in the Middle East.
A new report by the World Policy Institute examines how the United States provides billions of dollars of military aid to Israel each year and how their current arsenal is composed of U.S made equipment.
We can all breathe a sigh of relief that the Obama administration was forced to pull out of signing the Arms TradeTreaty in July.
Following its actions, China and Russia also balked.
So congratulations, once again, are in order — as your hard work paid off handsomely.
Over 50 US Senators ultimately signed a letter opposing this abomination!
But don’t think the UN has pulled back from its unremitting efforts to destroy your constitutional rights.
Earlier this month, the UN’s “Review Conference on Illicit Small Arms Trade” adopted an anti-gun “consensus outcome document” with the acquiescence of the Obama administration.
Among other things, the document, in the UN’s own words, “underscored efforts in marking, record-keeping and cooperation in tracing small arms ….” We all understand that this verbiage is code for national gun registration.
And in the words of the UN, “Member States agreed to strengthen national measures on marking ….”
Now “marking” can mean many things.
But we know from records of UN discussions, that one of the things it means is “microstamping.”
This procedure to imprint a unique identifier on fired cartridges, may or may not be safely scientifically achievable.
And at any rate, it is very costly.
Thus without admitting it, microstamping requirements could effectively put an end to your Second Amendment rights.
Now, the “consensus outcome document” will certainly not have the punch of a Senate-ratified treaty.
Nevertheless, we cannot assume it will not be a threat — or that the President won’t try to implement certain parts of it through Executive Order.
Of course, Barack Obama could do an illegal Executive Order or illegal regulation with or without UN encouragement, and that is something we might be facing during a second presidential term, if he is re-elected.
Assembled from military sources — especially this little-known June 2011 Air Force presentation(.pdf) – it is arguably the most comprehensive map so far of the spread of the Pentagon’s unmanned fleet.
What exact missions are performed at those locations, however, is not clear.
Some bases might be used as remote cockpits to control the robotic aircraft overseas, some for drone pilot training.
Others may also serve as imagery analysis depots.
The medium-size Shadow is used in 22 bases, the smaller Raven in 20 and the miniature Wasp in 11.
California and Texas lead the pack, with 10 and six sites, respectively, and there are also 22 planned locations for future bases.
”It is very likely that there are more domestic drone activities not included in the map, but it is designed to provide an approximate overview of the widespread nature of Department of Defense activities throughout the US,” Michael Haynes from Public Intelligence tells Danger Room.
The possibility of military drones (as well as those controlled by police departments and universities) flying over American skies have raised concerns among privacy activists.
The drones’ presence in our skies “threatens to eradicate existing practical limits on aerial monitoring and allow for pervasive surveillance, police fishing expeditions, and abusive use of these tools in a way that could eventually eliminate the privacy Americans have traditionally enjoyed in their movements and activities.”
As Danger Room reported last month, even military drones, which are prohibited from spying on Americans, may “accidentally” conduct such surveillance — and keep the data for months afterwards while they figure out what to do with it.
The material they collect without a warrant, as scholar Steven Aftergood revealed, could then be used to open an investigation.
The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the U.S. military from operating on American soil, and there’s no evidence that drones have violated it so far.
This new map comes almost two months after the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) revealed another one, this time of public agencies – including police departments and universities – that have a permit issued by the Federal Aviation Agency to use UAVs in American airspace.
“It goes to show you how entrenched drones already are,” said Trevor Timm, an EFF activist, when asked about the new map.
“It’s clear that the drone industry is expanding rapidly and this map is just another example of that. And if people are worried about military technology coming back and being sold in the US, this is just another example how drone technology is probably going to proliferate in the US very soon.”
Domestic proliferation isn’t the same as domestic spying, however.
Most — if not all — of these military bases would make poor surveillance centers.
Many of the locations are isolated, far from civilian populations.
Almost half of the bases on the map work only with the relatively small Raven and Shadow drones; their limited range and endurance make them imperfect spying tools, at best.
It’s safe to assume that most of the bases are just used for military training.
At the 2012, 67th UN General Assembly, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu became irrelevant.
The most overwhelming sign of this were surprising commentaries in the Hebrew media.
Despite its main editors being under Netanyahu’s control, the media’s main concern was what will Palestine President Mahmoud Abbas say and do.
Politically, Israel became subjugated to Palestine.
This was the result of dramatic events surrounding the UN General Debate. Israel publicly lost the support of its main ally—the USA—on the issue of an attack on Iran; it faces a diplomatic attack from its neighbor Egypt, and fears a Palestinian announcement on the dismantlement of the Palestinian Authority.
Netanyahu is not the man to face such harsh reality with equanimity; in fact Israel panicked and brought out a confused plan to trick Mahmoud Abbas into delivering a pro-Zionist speech.
To fulfill this Machiavellian plan, Israel recruited a Jewish Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. But, I’m rushing ahead.
Prologue: The Entire World is Against Netanyahu
Apparently, President Obama gave up on the Jewish vote for the imminent U.S. presidential elections.
Obama is not well-seen in Israel, where he is a popular target of racist caricatures.
According to Hebrew media, Obama and Netanyahu have nil personal relations between them; both gave up on an improvement.
This is to such an extent that president Obama gave up not only on the Jewish vote, but also on the Jewish money which is much more influential during a presidential campaign. Oddly enough, this made President Obama free to pursue American interests.
President Obama at UN 67th General Assembly
In recent months Netanyahu was trying to obtain a formal statement from president Obama regarding the red lines that if crossed by Iran would lead to an attack against it by the USA.
The details requested by Netanyahu included uranium enrichment levels and weapons development.
One week before the beginning of the UN General Assembly, Netanyahu said “the sooner we establish [red lines], the greater the chances that there won’t be a need for other types of action.”
He was referring to military actions by Israel and the USA against Iran.
Secretary of State Clinton replied on the same day “we’re not setting deadlines.”
This was emphasized by White House spokesman Jay Carney “It is not fruitful as part of this process to engage in that kind of specificity.”
In other words, Netanyahu cannot start a war on Iran.
He can’t even threat since he obviously lacks support from America. The USA won’t sacrifice two million sons for the sake of Israel’s belligerent goals.
In an interview to the New York Times, which preceded his UN speech, he said “If Washington is asking Egypt to honor its treaty with Israel, he said, Washington should also live up to its own Camp David commitment to Palestinian self-rule.”
In other words, he politely accused Israel of not honoring the peace agreement.
Under such circumstances, Egypt cannot be expected to observe it.
Netanyahu faces also a third threat, by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who is threatening to dismantle the Palestinian Authority if the peace talks with Israel don’t advance.
The result of such a step would be a Third Intifada, which will make the first two look like pale rehearsals to it.
Sweating profusely, Netanyahu pulled out of a dusty Mossad drawer an unbelievable plan.
Netanyahu’s Best Idea
On September 24, 2012, Mahmoud Abbas met American Jewish leaders in New York.
Among them was Alan Dershowitz, who is a Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School.
A supporter of Israel, Dershowitz asked Abbas to adopt the formula he had proposed on June 3, 2012, in a Wall Street Journal editorial and is known as the “Dershowitz Formula.”
Less dramatic than its name, it specifies the conditions for the renewal of the negotiations between Israel and Palestine.
Israel, American Jews and Dershowitz himself claim he is in a perfect position to make a fair offer that will be accepted by both sides.
Considering his Zionist connections, this claim is highly dubious.
The formula was stated by Professor Dershowitz as “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should now offer a conditional freeze: Israel will stop all settlement building in the West Bank as soon as the Palestinian Authority sits down at the bargaining table, and the freeze will continue as long as the talks continue in good faith.”
He was the man who saved the world by single-handedly averting World War Three five decades ago, yet he died humiliated, outcast and an unknown. Only now has his story has come to light.
A documentary shown tonight told how for 13 days during the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, the world held its breath as the U.S.S.R. and the U.S. stood on the brink of nuclear war.
At the height of the Cold War, when paranoia on both sides meant the slightest provocation could spark nuclear war, four submarines secretly set sail from Russia to communist Cuba.
Averted war:Vasili Arkhipoy (pictured above, and bottom aboard a submarine), saved the world by single-handedly averting World War Three with one decision 50 years ago, yet he died humiliated, outcast and an unknown
Only a handful of the submariners on board knew that their ships carried nuclear weapons, each with the strength of the bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in 1945.
Vasili Arkhipov, aboard the sub B59, was one of them. As his craft neared Cuba, U.S. helicopters, aeroplanes and battleships were scouring the ocean for Russian subs.
‘At that period of time it was called“special weapon”, not“nuclear torpedo”,’ said Viktor Mikhailov, junior navigator on Sub B-59. ‘At that time we couldn’t even imagine a nuclear torpedo.’
In a game of high stakes cat and mouse it wasn’t long before the Russians were spotted. Arkhipov’s sub was forced to make an emergency dive.
Remembered:Arkhipov is pictured above with his wife Olga in 1957, and bottom with his daughter Yelena, three years before he died in 1998
Tense:For 13 days during the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, the world held its breath as the USSR and the U.S. stood on the brink of nuclear war
As the submariners tried to stay hidden from their US hunters, conditions in the sub deteriorated. For a week they stayed underwater, in sweltering 60C heat, rationed to just one glass of water a day.
Above them, the U.S. navy were ‘hunting by exhaustion’ – trying to force the Soviet sub to come to the surface to recharge its batteries.
They had no idea that on board the submarines were weapons capable of destroying the entire American fleet.
Gary Slaughter, a signalman on board the USS Cony battleship, said: ‘We knew they were probably having trouble breathing. It was hot as hell in there, they were miserable.’
Mr President:John F. Kennedy was in office in the U.S. between 1961 and 1963, at the height of the crisis
Tense:The documentary recreated the dramatic moment when Soviet sailors decided not to fire the weapon
‘They were cramped together and they had been under great stress for a long time. Basically what we were trying to do was apply passive torture.
‘Frankly I don’t think we felt any sympathy for them at all. They were the enemy.’
The Americans decided to ratchet up the pressure, and dropped warning grenades into the sea. Inside the sub, the Soviet submariners thought they were under attack.
Valentin Savitsky, the captain of B59, was convinced the nuclear war had already started.
He demanded that the submariners launch their torpedo to save some of Russia’s pride.
The programme on Channel 5 revealed how in any normal circumstances Savitsky’s orders would have been followed, and World War Three would have been unleashed.
‘Close friend’:Ryurik Ketov, commander of Sub B-4, said Arkhipov was ‘cool-headed’ and ‘in control’
Memories:Viktor Mikhailov, junior navigator on Sub B-59, said they had a ‘special weapon’ on board, which was not even referred to as a ‘nuclear weapon’
Ryurik Ketov, commander of another sub, Sub B-4, said: ‘Vasili Arkhipov was a submariner and a close friend of mine. He was a family friend. He stood out for being cool-headed. He was in control.’
Savitsky hadn’t counted on Arkhipov. As commander of the fleet, Arkhipov had the last veto. And although his men were against him, he insisted that they must not fire – and instead surrender.
It was a humiliating move – but one that saved the world. The Soviet submariners were forced to return to their native Russia, where they were given the opposite of a hero’s welcome.
Historian Thomas Blanton told the Sun: ‘What heroism, what duty, they fulfilled to go halfway across the world and come back, and survive.’
Covert mission:In a game of high stakes cat and mouse it wasn’t long before the Russian’s were spotted
Proud:Arkopov’s widow Olga said: ‘I was proud and I am proud of my husband, always’
‘But in fact, one of the Russian admirals told the submariners; “It would have been better if you’d gone down with your ship.” Extraordinary.’
Four decades passed before the story of what really happened on the B59 sub was discovered. It was after Arkipov had died in 1998 from radiation poisoning.
But to his widow Olga, he was always a hero.
She said: ‘He knew that it was madness to fire the nuclear torpedo. In Cuba, in honour of the 40th anniversary of the crisis, people gathered.
‘They said that the person who prevented a nuclear war was the Russian submariner Vasili Arkhipov. I was proud and I am proud of my husband always.’
This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777