DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

Posts Tagged ‘DEPOPULATE’

REAL NEWS Aug 17, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on August 16, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : August 17, 2012

=================================================================================================

The American Way

 

 

From The Intel Hub

By Stephen LendmanContributor
theintelhub.com
August 16, 2012

Past and present leaders reveal the soul of their nations.

Arguably America never had one.

Current domestic and foreign policies provide convincing evidence.

Police state harshness targets defenders of right over wrong everywhere.

National resources go for militarism, belligerence, and making super-rich elites richer.

Corporations are licensed to steal, exploit, and plunder.

Wars ravage one country after another.

Humanity is ruthlessly destroyed.

Battlefields shift from one theater to another.

Gangsterism writ large reflects official policy. Syria is ground zero.

Months of Western generated violence left thousands dead, many more injured, and countless numbers displaced.

Nothing deters America’s war machine madness.

Bloodlust defines it.

Dominance matters most. Body counts mount.

Rule of law principles and democratic values are considered quaint and out of date.

Stomping on people is policy.

Concern for human and civil rights is off the table.

Winning hearts and minds was never America’s game.

Crushing the will to resist is more important.

Repression enforces the message harshly.

Death squad diplomacy eliminates non-believers.

Where it ends, who knows!

Despite ongoing direct and proxy wars, hawkish US lawmakers want more.

John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman are three of America’s worst. Peace they believe is abhorrent.

Death squad massacres in Syria aren’t enough.

As a 2008 presidential candidate, McCain’s advocated bombing Iran.

“Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran,” he sang on his “Straight Talk” tour to the tune of a popular Beach Boys song.

Lunatics like this run America.

Now McCain wants more.

So do Graham and Lieberman.

They’re not alone.

On August 5, the Washington Post gave them op-ed space.

Together they headlined “The risks of inaction in Syria,” saying:

Provide “robust assistance” to opposition fighters.

Establish and reinforce safe zones.

Use “airpower and other unique US assets.”

Damn the risks. (I)naction carries” greater ones. “(S)trategic” aims matter most.

Failure to intervene more aggressively “jeopardiz(es) both our national security interests and our moral standing in the world.”

Fact check

Official US policy calls for replacing all independent governments with pro-Western ones.

War is America’s national pastime. Dominance alone matters.

Sovereign rights can’t be allowed to interfere.

Washington planned war on Syria years ago.

It’s orchestrating events on the ground.

It’s been involved from day one.

It’s recruiting, arming, funding, training, and directing mercenary killers.

It’s not good enough so let’s bomb, say McCain, Graham and Lieberman.

With these type lawmakers influencing policy, don’t bet money on humanity surviving.

Don’t expect America to renounce war.

Don’t imagine embracing democratic values is planned.

Hunker down for worse to come.

Get involved and try to stop it.

Syria is about to go up in flames.

Iran is next, then other nations.

No good ending comes from this.

Wars beget more of them.

Permanent ones assure self-destruction.

Perhaps America will take humanity with it.

It’s not far-fetched. Partnered with Britain, other key NATO allies, Israel, and regional despots, chances of armageddon are too high to risk.

Chances for homeland tyranny are virtually certain. Militarism writ large heads it there.

It’s closer than most people imagine.

It’s not pretty now. Expect much worse ahead.

It could come any time.

Battleground Syria could shift venues to America if popular resistance erupts.

Daily violence and atrocities there could become commonplace domestically.

Some neighborhoods already experience low intensity versions of what could easily ratchet higher.

Hammering one country after another draws it closer.

Former State Department official Anne-Marie Slaughter mimicks McCain, Graham and Lieberman.

Halting Syrian violence depends on increasing it, they believe.

People like this run America. They’re interviewed on US television.

They’re given feature op-ed space.

Earlier, Slaughter called for “no-kill zones.”

Pentagon officials call them “buffer zones.”

They’re ground-based no-fly zones.

If established, they assure full-scale war.

Slaughter supports no holds barred escalation.

On July 31, her Financial Times article headlined “We will pay a high price if we do not arm Syria’s rebels,” saying:

She wants that and more.

“It is time for bold action,” she said. She suggests Libya 2.0. Go for broke, she urges.

Other hawks echo her sentiment.

“Syrians will remember those who remember them,” she said.

The longer fighting rages, the greater Assad’s support grows, the more America is hated.

Syrians aren’t stupid. They know what Washington did to Iraq and Libya.

They know what’s gone on in Afghanistan since 2001.

They understand that wherever America arrives, death, destruction, and unspeakable human misery follow.

If Washington wins, they lose.

They’re willing to die to prevent it.

America plans full-scale war.

Imagine how many more will die. Imagine the vast destruction.

Imagine any nation ravaging others. It’s the American way.

Permanent wars are waged for wealth, power and dominance.

At the same time, homeland needs go begging.

Out-of-control militarism heads America for tyranny and ruin.

Along the way, millions suffer and die.

Obama follows in the tradition of previous warrior presidents.

Over time, stakes and risks grow exponentially.

State-of the art weapons threaten everyone.

Obama’s National Security Strategy “reserve(s) the right to act unilaterally if necessary to defend out nation and our interests.”

In other words, preemptive wars with weapons of mass destruction is policy.

Obama claims it’s “to keep the American people safe (and advance the nation’s) values and ideals.”

It threatens other countries to bend to Washington’s will or else.

In the process it destroys freedom. Chalmers Johnson called war profiteering “the most efficient means for well-connected capitalists to engorge themselves at the public trough.”

Expect more of it, he warned. Expect tyranny to replace democracy.

Expect hell on earth so globalists can control it.

Maybe they’ll destroy it instead.

==============================================================================================

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book is titled How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon.

All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ammo? What Ammo? : DHS Takes Unprecedented Step Of Redacting Mass Ammunition Purchase

 

 

From Alexander Higgins Blog

Alexander HigginsPosted by  – August 16, 2012

If there were ever a red flag, we think this is it as the DHS has issued a blackout surrounding its mass latest mass ammo purchase..

The Department of Homeland Security has redacted information relating to the quantity of bullets it is buying following a controversy concerning the agency’s purchase of over a billion rounds of ammo, which many fear is a sign the federal government is preparing for civil unrest in the United States.

Despite the fact that documents are only supposed to be redacted if authorized by Congress or for national security reasons, a solicitation posted on the FedBizOpps website yesterday concerning ammunition purchases made by the DHS on behalf of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) contains numerous blacked out sections.

The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to black out sections of the document, including the number of bullets being purchased, is likely to be related to a massive controversy which has snowballed over the last few weeks pertaining to concerns as to why the federal agency has purchased well over a billion rounds of bullets over the last 6 months alone.

Given the fact that the DHS is also acquiring riot gear in preparation for civil unrest which could take place at the upcoming DNC, RNC and presidential inauguration, the purchase of ammunition in such massive numbers has stoked fears that the federal government could be preparing to use force against the American people.

This screenshot illustrates how the DHS has blacked out information pertaining to the amount of bullets being purchased.

The trigger for this could be an economic collapse that causes angry Americans to flood the streets similar to scenes witnessed across Europe over the last two years.

As Mike Adams writes, “The U.S. government clearly sees the writing on the wall. What lays ahead for America is a day of unbearable reckoning.

The financial collapse will wipe out savings accounts, pensions, investment funds and equities of the working class, all across the nation.

Imagine bank accounts being reset to zero, “bank holidays” enforced at gunpoint.

That will unleash a wave of violent protests, social chaos and even talk of revolution.

The government will almost certainly respond with a declaration of Martial Law, the rolling out of highway checkpoints, and before long, the use of live ammo on unruly protesters.”

Source: Infowars

One possible reason behind why DHS is now trying to erase any record of how much ammunition they are purchasing is newly proposed legislation in California that would red flag anyone who purchases more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition in a five (5) day period.

Perhaps Homeland Security’s redaction is an effort to stay off the red list (of which so many of our readers are certainly now members of).

All kidding aside, there must be something to this.

For what reason would a public agency redact a public purchase order without the approval of Congress?

Perhaps there is already a national security issue in place that we have not yet been made aware of.

As DHS notes in their order, there is an “unusual and compelling urgency” to purchasing this ammunition.

Apparently the one billion rounds already purchased in the last twelve months isn’t enough and Homeland Security is planning on running out.

Either they’ve been doing some serious target shooting across the country to burn through that much ammo, or they plan on using it soon and expect that a billion just isn’t going to cut it.

What could possibly be so urgent that they are running low given how much they have already stockpiled?

Congressional members are looking into banning online ammunition sales on a national level and now states are starting to red flag people for acquiring ammo in bulk, yet not a peep from Congress, the President or any mainstream media organization on why our government is stockpiling hundreds of millions of bullets.

If there were ever a red flag, we think this is it.

Source: SHTFplan.com

Stay up to date with the latest news :

Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/kr3at

Facebook: http://facebook.com/alexhiggins732

Live TV And Videos: Higgins TV

Website: The Alexander Higgins Blog

Headlines: Real-time News Headlines

Related Posts :

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Greatest Medical Fraud in History – The Pain, Profit and Politics of AIDS (Full Version)

 

 

From Underground Documentaries

Does HIV really cause AIDS

Can we really believe the pharmaceutical industrial complex?

Could it be that after so many years of research, and so much money being spent, that the entire orthodox medical establishment has been wrong about AIDS,

or even worse, has sought to profit from a system that it KNEW was flawed from the beginning?

Join legendary documentarian and best-selling author Gary “Mr. Natural” Null, Ph.D., for a journey into the darkest recesses of the medical industry –

a journey that not only asks the most painful questions, but even proposes the most intriguing truths about a disease we continue to know so little about.

For more information and in-depth investigative reports visit http://garynull.com

 ===============================================================

BUT, WE ALSO HAVE THIS INTERESTING INFO :

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY – Dr Robert Gallo

Uploaded by  on Dec 2, 2011

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY – Dr Robert Gallo

Courtesy: Dr Leonard Horovitz [in the interests of extending Human Educational knowledge].

AIDS was deliberately created to deliberately depopulation development of humanity – created at Fort Dietrick through US Bioweapons development.

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Police Release ‘Suicide’ Reenactment Video Of Handcuffed Man Who Shot Himself In The Head

 

 

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on August 15, 2012 by Clark Kent

Infowars  

Arkansas – Police in Jonesboro investigating the death of a man they detained in the back of a squad carhave released a video that they say explains how he could have shot himself in the head while his hands were handcuffed behind his back.

The story hit the headlines earlier this month as officers claimed that 21 year old Chavis Carter killed himself after being searched on suspicion of possessing marijuana.

Officers double-locked the handcuffs, making it harder for the lock to be picked, but claimed that Carter was able to pull out a hidden gun, raise it to his head and pull the trigger while they were temporarily away from the car.

The officers say they found a small, .380 caliber handgun and a spent cartridge in the backseat next to Carter’s slumped lifeless body.

They claim that the weapon must have been overlooked when they searched Carter, twice.

As part of the investigation into the death, and perhaps also in response to claims of foul play, police released a video, depicting several officers of different heights and builds being cuffed, but still being able to raise a concealed replica gun to their heads.

In a message at the beginning, the video is described as “non-evidentiary reproduction of facts and circumstances associated with the pending investigation of the Chavis Carter in-custody death.”

The message states that the scenes depicted were intended to investigate “the possibility that an individual, hand-cuffed behind his back, may or may not have the ability to use a concealed firearm in a manner that would give rise to his or her death.”

“The circumstances displayed are not intended to illustrate the only means by which an individual could injure themselves but merely to determine the feasibility of these actions,” the video states.

“The investigation is active and awaits forensic and other investigative material that will be used to complete a full inquiry into this matter.” the message concludes.

Watch the video:

http://www.kait8.com/category/240189/video-landing-page?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=7609548

KAIT-Jonesboro, AR-News, weather, sports, classifieds

“The fact of it is, it’s very possible and it’s quite easy.” said Police Chief Michael Yates in response to CNN reporter Randi Kaye’s question of whether anyone could shoot themselves while handcuffed.

With regard to the mystery of the hidden gun, Yates said “It’s obvious they did miss the weapon on the first search. It is likely, since he was placed into the car unhandcuffed the first time, that he had an opportunity to stash the weapon in the car. The second search, which was more thorough and inclusive, did not disclose the weapon either.”

Sergeant Lyle Waterworth has attempted to deflect accusations of murder by claiming that officers could have easily missed the gun during the search.

“Any given officer has missed something on a search, be it drugs, knife, razor blades, this instance it happened to be a gun” said Waterworth.

Local activists have called for Yates’ resignation, saying that past racially motivated run-ins with black residents make him unfit to lead the investigation.

The Jonesboro Sun has also reported that only three of 145 members of the police force under Yates are black.

Carter’s family and supporters in the community say they have dismissed the suicide explanation as a cover-up for murder.

“I think they killed him, my son wasn’t suicidal,” said Carter’s mother Teresa Carter.

She has also noted that Chavis was shot in the right temple and yet he is left-handed.

Carter also points out that Chavis called his girlfriend while pulled over and assured her that he would be in contact again when he got to jail.

The AP reports that Russell Marlin, a Memphis, Tenn.-based attorney representing Carter’s family, does not believe that Carter was suicidal.

“By all accounts, he was a healthy, happy guy. There’s no reason to think he would have killed himself,” Martin said.

The officers involved in the incident remain on leave pending the investigation.

As police brutality in America escalates to new heights of violence and abuse, more and more unprovoked deaths are occurring, but punishments for officers who shoot victims dead are often miniscule.

In January 2009, 22-year-old Oscar Grant was shot in the back by policeman Johannes Mehserle as he lay on a platform at a railway station in Oakland California.

Mehserle was charged with involuntary manslaughter after he claimed he had meant to use his Taser and not a gun and ended up serving just two years in jail for killing Grant.

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Episode 13 – Michael Parenti on The Corporate Plutocracy

 

 

~(Michael Parenti)~

From Smells Like Human Spirit Podcast

Posted by  – August 15, 2012

DOWNLOAD MP3

SUBSCRIBE VIA ITUNES

FOLLOW @smellslikepod – TWITTER

For Episode 13 of the Smells Like Human Spirit Podcast, we are lucky enough to be joined by an internationally known award winning-author and lecturer – Michael Parenti.

Michael received his Ph.D. in political science from Yale University, and has taught at a number of colleges and universities all over the world.

He is as powerful and engaging in public speaking as he is on the page, and his work covers a wide range of subjects, including U.S. politics, culture, ideology, ancient and modern history, imperialism, the news and entertainment media, and war.

In his highly influential magnum opus Democracy For The Few, now in its ninth edition, Parenti presents a stunning critical analysis of American society, economy, and political institutions.

In this particular interview, he elucidates on the overarching ideological production that impacts on corporate-owned news media.

Areas of discussion include how the mass media favours elite interests, divides the working class against each other, and prevents the public at large from achieving independent thinking about world events.

You do not want to miss this!

Send us your feedback at smellslikehumanspirit@gmail.com

Smells Like Human Spirit on Facebook 

Enjoy!

Episode 13 – Michael Parenti on The Corporate Plutocracy

 To download this episode directly, click this link :http://traffic.libsyn.com/smellslikepodcast/Smells_Like_Human_Spirit_Episode_…

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

Advertisements

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on REAL NEWS Aug 17, 2012

REAL NEWS July 02, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on July 1, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : July 02, 2012

=================================================================================================

Watching the Clock: Will a Total Economic Collapse Occur in September-October?

 

From the Trenches

Posted on July 1, 2012 by Admin


SHTF Plan  People like to ask about dates. “When do you think the collapse will happen?” they ask. What are your thoughts on the Mayan calendar? How ’bout December 21st, 2012?

Most of us informed and awake folks aren’t interested in trying to predict specific dates.

That’s an art best left to Nostradamus.

That said, highly respected truth tellers James Turk and John Williams have both tied dates to predictions.

In an interview with James Turk he told me that he thinks we will see $400 silver and $8,000 gold some time between 2013-2015.

And John Williams firmly believes the die has been cast for hyperinflation in the United States, likely beginning in 2014.

Over the past 48 hours we’ve stumbled across three separate pieces of information, all predicting essentially the exact same thing regarding a fall 2012 economic collapse.

Serendipity or coincidence, it’s information I want to pass on. As always, discussion is welcomed below.

The first warning is from a St. Louis based police officer who called into the Alex Jones radio show on Sunday, June 24th.

The second warning comes our way via the SilverDoctors. And the third came today from unflappable Director of UBS Floor OperationsArt Cashin.

All three warnings are presented here for your benefit and consideration:

The first warning came our way via the Sunday broadcast of the Alex Jones radio show.

Jones announced that he only wanted to take calls from members of the military or police.

A man identifying himself as a police officer named ‘Jim’ called in to report some startling information.

We have been told that in October we need to be prepared for an event that will require us to use air and ground support, in conjunction with the military here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wALNWwzERQ4&feature=player_embedded

During the call Jim comes across as passionate, sincere and very shaken by the information he tries to share.

After the commercial break, Jim gets choked up as he tries to convey his appreciation for what Alex Jones has tried to do in terms of waking people up in the effort to save the Republic from the clutches of the forces seeking to destroy it.

Now, nearly in tears, Jim concludes by saying “This country’s dead Alex. It’s gone” before unexpectedly hanging up.

Here’s the entire call including the head of the show with the date of the broadcast for posterity’s sake.

I edited out the commercial break, and posted this call on my backupYou Tube channel SGTreport.

Warning 2 from Silver Doctors, on Monday:

LEAP/2020 has issued a RED ALERT for the Western banking system, stating that Europe’s hour of payment has arrived, and compares the next two months to the Israelites circling Jericho for 7 days prior to blasting the trumpets.

LEAP/2020′s red alert states the Western banking system’s trumpet blast will occur in September or October.

The seven blasts of the trumpets of Jericho marking the September October 2012 period will cause the “Dollar Wall’s” last sections and the walls which have protected the world as we know it since 1945 to collapse.

The shock of the autumn 2008 will seem like a small summer storm compared to what will affect planet in several months.

The third warning comes by way of Art Cashin and Zero Hedge on Tuesday morning:

While Europe is dominating headlines this week, UBS’ Art Cashin suggests “mark your calendar and cross your fingers” as he notes the disproportionate prevalence of events that occur in September.

Focusing on The Economist’s Greg Ip’s recent post on a possible seasonal pattern in banking crises, via this recent Reinhart & Rogoff extension paper by Laeven and Valencia, he notes: “The frequency with which the world goes to hell in September seems hardly random.” 

Unfortunately the authors provide no explanation for this beyond observing, “An interesting pattern emerges: banking crises tend to start in the second half of the year, with large September and December effects.”

No one can possibly know exactly when the death of the Western fiat banking system will occur.

We just know that it will collapse – it cannot be stopped.

And increasingly it looks like it will happen sooner rather than later.

This is not fear porn.

It’s the reality of the dire times we now find ourselves in. Take heed, and prepare the best you can.

We are all in this mess together.

END

 

 

 

 

‘This is WHY We Fought the REVOLUTION’

MUST HEAR: ‘This is WHY We Fought the REVOLUTION’ – Harley Schlanger [Part 1 and 2]

 

Published on Jul 1, 2012 by 

PART 1 of 2:

This is a MUST LISTEN Interview:

Harley says “Obama MUST be impeached NOW… An interlocking Board of Directors controls EVERY cartel; Banking, Oil, Strategic metals, the grains, and so on.

Right now even the Rothschilds are being bailed out… The whole trans Atlantic financial system is more bankrupt now than it was when Lehman collapsed in 2008… “

Harley Schlanger is the National Spokesman for the LaRouche Organization.

His grasp of history and his appreciation for the founding principles of the United States make this a profoundly compelling interview.

If you close your eyes, you’d swear this man was a Libertarian. http://larouchepac.com/

Music: “Stormfront” by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)

Licensed under Creative Commons “Attribution 3.0” http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/”
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode

★::::RON PAUL 2012::::★

My website:

SGTreport.com

The content in my videos and on the SGTbull07 channel are provided for informational purposes only.

Use the information found in my videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence (DD) BEFORE making any significant investing decisions.

SGTbull07 assumes all information to be truthful and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information.

Thank you.

END

 

 

 

 

Obama Planning More War: Who’s next? Syria? Iran? Both Countries are Targetted

 

From Global Research.ca

by Stephen Lendman – July 01, 2012

America’s favorite pastime isn’t baseball. It’s war, permanent imperial wars that won’t end in our lifetime Dick Cheney said earlier.

America is addicted to war. One nation after another is ravaged and plundered. Unchallenged global dominance is sought. 

Who’s next? Syria? Iran? Washington’s long knives target both countries.

On June 29, AP headlined “US, Russia fail to reach agreement on Syria, jeopardizing Annan plan to end crisis,” saying:

Before heading for Geneva, Hillary Clinton and Sergey Lavrov met in St. Petersburg. Differences between them weren’t resolved.

Washington demands regime change. Moscow wants Syrians to decide who’ll lead them. Lavrov said:

We “agreed to look for an agreement that will bring us closer based on a clear understanding of what’s written in the Annan plan that (all) sides in Syria need an incentive for a national dialogue.”

“But it’s only up to the Syrians to make agreements on what the Syrian state will be like, who will hold (government) jobs and positions.”

 Putting a brave face on intractable differences, Lavrov hoped Geneva discussions would move closer to resolving Syria’s conflict peacefully. “But I am not saying that we will agree on every dot.”

 Kofi Annan proposed unity government. Government and opposition members would be included. Elements seeking belligerent change would be excluded. 

Russia and other major powers expressed support. Washington insists Assad must go.

He told Iran’s IRIB channel 4:

“We, in Syria, do not accept any model that is not Syrian and national, regardless of whether it was imposed by superpowers or proposed by friendly countries.” 

“No one knows how to resolve the problem in Syria as well as we do, as Syrians….so, any model that comes from abroad is unacceptable regardless of its content.”

 At the same time, he thanked Russia, China, and other countries for trying to resolve things peacefully to restore stability.

On June 30, America, Russia, China, Britain, France, Turkey, Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar met in Geneva. Moscow wanted Iran there.

Washington rejected Tehran’s participation.

Reports late Saturday said world powers struck a transitional government deal. What part Assad would play remains unclear. 

Russia says Syrians must decide who’ll lead them. The deal struck has no preconditions. 

Ahead of word from Geneva, insurgent leaders rejected transitional government with Assad in it. Earlier they spurned peace initiatives.

They take orders from Washington. 

Expect little more now than earlier. America won’t tolerate peaceful resolution. Regime change depends on violence and instability.

What’s next remains to be seen.

Iran is also targeted. On June 25, Aviation Week (AW) headlined “Raiding Iran Triggers Discussion of When and How,” saying:

“Evidence is mounting that the U.S. defense community and the Obama administration view 2013 as the likely window for a bombing attack on Iran’s nuclear and missile facilities.”

“It could be earlier, timed to use the chaos of the Syrian government’s fall to disguise such an attack, or later, if international negotiations with Iran stretch out without failing completely.” 

“But there is evidence that Iran’s intransigence over shutting down its uranium-enrichment program will not buy it much more time.”

“The tools for (conducting) an attack are all operational.”

 Proponents in and outside America suggest Iran already conducted one or more nuclear tests in North Korea. Corroborating evidence didn’t follow claims.

They’re baseless like other accusations about Tehran menacing the region.

Debate continues in Washington. To attack or not attack? If so, when? Electoral priorities dictate policy.

Three unnamed retired senior war planners offered views.

Comments were as follows:

“I think it would take an extraordinarily dumb move on the part of the Iranians to force U.S. kinetic interventions before the U.S. presidential election (by abandoning negotiations).”

“Israel has fewer reservations (about attacking) given the recent solidification of their government.”

The most politically opportune time would be 2013 or 2014.

“The assessment I’m betting on is continued watching, but (with U.S. forces) close to action.”

 An attack “would employ a totally stealthy force of F-22s, B-2s and Jassms (joint air-to-surface standoff missiles) that are launched from F-15Es and (Block 40) F-16s.”

Other advanced weapons and radar jamming devices would be used.

“We should give Iran advanced warning that we will damage and likely destroy its nuclear facilities. It is not an act of war against Iran, the Iranian people or Islam.” 

“It is a pre-emptive attack solely against their nuclear facilities and the military targets protecting them. We will take extraordinary measures to protect against collateral damage.”

The above comment doesn’t square with reality. An attack means war. Launching one assures many deaths. Vast destruction will occur. Civilian infrastructure and military targets will be struck. War planners know what’s involved. The pattern repeats from one conflict to the next.

At a February Israeli security conference, Lt. General (ret.) Dan Halutz (former IDF chief of staff) said Iran’s nuclear program shouldn’t be used as an excuse for Israel to attack unilaterally. 

“The military option should be last, and it should be led by others.” He meant Washington, but Israel would be involved.

Another issue is Syria. It has surveillance and air defense capabilities. Damascus shares information with Tehran. Attacking Iran involves possible routes over Turkey, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Israel.

Syrian radar would detect it. Ousting Assad denies Iran advance warning.

According to America’s Israeli ambassador Daniel Shapiro, Washington is ready to act if diplomatic talks fail. The military option is “not just available, it’s ready,” he said. 

“The necessary planning has been done to ensure that it’s ready. The international community has been notified.”

 According to US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta:

“The fundamental premise is that neither the U.S. nor the international community is going to allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon.”

 “We will do everything we can to prevent them from developing a weapon. We have plans to be able to implement any contingency we have to in order to defend ourselves.”

 Cyberattack is another option. According to US Lt. General (ret.) David Deptula:

“It depends on what the objectives are. What we want to be able to do is to get our foes to act in accordance with our strategic objectives without ever knowing they have been acted upon. Operations in cyberspace allow that to happen.”

 It’s well known that Iran poses no nuclear threat. Claiming otherwise is red herring cover for regime change. 

Its program is peaceful. It complies fully with NPT provisions. US intelligence and IAEA inspectors confirmed it. In contrast, Israel is nuclear armed and dangerous. It menaces the region and beyond. It passes under the radar unmentioned.

On June 21, Haaretz headlined “As nuclear talks fail, US experts urge Obama to weigh military option on Iran,” saying:

Forty-four US senators wrote Obama. They want pressure, not more dialogue. They listed specific demands. They include shutting down Tehran’s heavily protected Fordo facility, halting uranium enrichment above 5%, and shipping amounts above it offshore.

They urged options including military action if Iran doesn’t comply.

The House Armed Services Committee heard testimonies on “Addressing the Iranian Nuclear Challenge: Understanding the Military Option.”

According to former Senator Charles Robb:

“(T)he dual approach of diplomacy and sanctions simply have not proved to be enough. We need the third track, and that is credible and visible preparations for a military option.”

“(W)e are not urging Israel to take unilateral military action against Iran nuclear facilities, but we need to make their capability to do so stronger so that Iran will take that threat more seriously.”

 “We are not advocating another war in this region,” he claimed. His comments, of course, don’t square with reality.

Washington and Israel plan joint military exercises this fall. They were scheduled earlier but postponed. Called “Austere Challenge 12,” it’s expected to be the largest scale operation between the two countries.

Last March, Senator Barbara Boxer (D. CA) introduced S. 2165: United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012. On June 19, it was reported to committee. On June 29, it passed by voice vote.

HR 4133 is the companion House bill. On May 9, it passed overwhelmingly. John Dingell (D. MI) and Ron Paul (R. TX) cast the only “no” votes. 

Paul called the measure “another piece of one-sided and counter-productive foreign policy legislation. This bill’s real intent seems to be more saber-rattling against Iran and Syria, and it undermines U.S. diplomatic efforts by making clear that the U.S. is not an honest broker seeking peace for the Middle East.”

“The bill calls for the United States to significantly increase our provision of sophisticated weaponry to Israel, and states that it is to be U.S. policy to ‘help Israel preserve its qualitative military edge’ in the region.”

“While I absolutely believe that Israel – and any other nation – should be free to determine for itself what is necessary for its national security, I do not believe that those decisions should be underwritten by U.S. taxpayers and backed up by the U.S. military.”

Paul added that the bill won’t help America, Israel, or the Middle East. It implicitly authorizes greater US regional intervention at a time wars ravage it. 

War with Syria and/or Iran will follow, he believes. According to Haaretz, Washington and Israel “continue preparations for strik(ing) Iran’s nuclear facilities….A senior Israeli official (said) Netanyahu has decided to attack Iran before the US elections in November.”

The US-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act reaffirms America’s “unwavering commitment to the security of the State of Israel as a Jewish State.” It’s also to ensure its military strength.

House co-sponsor Eric Cantor (R. VA) said:

“This bill reaffirms Israel’s right to defend itself against threats and puts Congress on the record about America’s long-standing commitment to the US-Israel strategic relationship, a unique and special relationship founded on shared interests and shared democratic values.”

“This bill recognizes the profound threats the U.S. and Israel face in the region and reiterates our commitment to standing side by side with Israel during this pivotal and dangerous period of transition and instability.”

Following passage, AIPAC said:

“This vote is a testament to the broad, bipartisan support of the American people for bolstering the ties between the US and our ally Israel.”

 “The United States benefits greatly through enhanced cooperation with Israel, and this bipartisan bill recommends new avenues for the US-Israel relationship to grow and strengthen in the fields of missile defense, homeland security, energy, intelligence, and cyber security.”

 Congress recently voted to increase military aid for Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system. Israel gets more annual aid than all other nations combined. Most goes for military purposes. 

Both countries are imperial partners. Together with Britain, France, other NATO allies and regional ones, they threaten humanity.

==========================================

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net

His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”

http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

Stephen Lendman is a frequent contributor to Global Research.  Global Research Articles by Stephen Lendman

END

 

 

 

 

WHO RUNS THE MADHOUSE? by Dr Paul Craig Roberts

 

From Darkmoon

Posted on July 1, 2012 by Montecristo

Source:  Can the World Survive Washington’s Hubris?
Pictures and captions by Lasha Darkmoon

WHO RULES AMERICA?

When President Reagan nominated me as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy, he told me that we had to restore the US economy, to rescue it from stagflation,

in order to bring the full weight of a powerful economy to bear on the Soviet leadership in order to convince them to negotiate the end of the cold war.

Reagan said that there was no reason to live any longer under the threat of nuclear war.

The Reagan administration achieved both goals, only to see these accomplishments discarded by successor administrations.

It was Reagan’s own vice president and successor, George Herbert Walker Bush, who first violated the Reagan-Gorbachev understandings by incorporating former constituent parts of the Soviet Empire into NATO and taking Western military bases to the Russian frontier.

The process of surrounding Russia with military bases continued unabated through successor US administrations with various “color revolutions” financed by the US National Endowment for Democracy, regarded by many as a front for the CIA.

Washington even attempted to install a Washington-controlled government in Ukraine and did succeed in this effort in former Soviet Georgia, the birthplace of Joseph Stalin.

The President of Georgia, a country located between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, is a Washington puppet.

Recently, he announced that former Soviet Georgia is on schedule to become a NATO member in 2014.

Those old enough to remember know that NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, was an alliance between Western Europe and the US against the threat of the Red Army overrunning Western Europe.

The North Atlantic is a long, long ways from the Black and Caspian Seas.

What is the purpose of Georgia being a NATO member except to give Washington a military base on the Russian underbelly?

The evidence is simply overwhelming that Washington—both parties—have Russia and China targeted.

Whether the purpose is to destroy both countries or merely to render them unable to oppose Washington’s world hegemony is unclear at this time.

Regardless of the purpose, nuclear war is the likely outcome.

ARMAGEDDON  APPROACHES . . .

The presstitute American press pretends that an evil Syrian government is murdering innocent citizens who only want democracy and that if the UN won’t intervene militarily, the US must in order to save human rights.

Russia and China are vilified by US functionaries for opposing any pretext for a NATO invasion of Syria.

The facts, of course, are different from those presented by the presstitute American media and members of the US government.

The Syrian “rebels” are well armed with military weapons.

The “rebels” are battling the Syrian army.

The rebels massacre civilians and report to their media whores in the West that the deed was done by the Syrian government, and the Western presstitutes spread the propaganda.

Someone is arming the “rebels” as obviously the weapons can’t be purchased in local Syrian markets.

Most intelligent people believe the weapons are coming from the US or from US surrogates.

“DIVIDE ET IMPERA” — DIVIDE AND RULE

The object is to fragment Syria into petty sectarian statelets forever at each others’ throats. Ideally, this will be accomplished by a war that will do for Syria what has already been done so spectacularly for Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, i.e., destroy their infrastructures and leave them in ruins.

When Syria is destroyed and more of its land annexed to Israel, adding to the territory already stolen in the water-rich Golan Heights, the next step will be the fragmentation of Iran and the plunder of its oil and gas resources.

Iran is the big one. Syria is the small one on the way to Iran. As the neoconservative chickenhawks in Washington keep saying: “Real men go to Tehran!”  (LD)

(For more on Israel’s role in the Syrian situation, see ‘Israel, Master of Puppets in Syria Unrest.’)

So, Washington has started a civil war in Syria, as it did in Libya, but this time the gullible Russians and Chinese have caught on and have refused to permit a UN resolution like the one the West exploited against Gaddafi.

To get around this roadblock, fish out an ancient Phantom fighter jet from the 1960s Vietnam war era and have Turkey fly it into Syria.

The Syrians will shoot it down, and then Turkey can appeal to its NATO allies to come to its aid against Syria.

Denied the UN option, Washington can invoke its obligation under the NATO treaty, and go to war in defense of a NATO member against a demonized Syria.

What was that Turkish plane doing sniffing around Syrian airspace? —

It was begging to be shot down! So that Turkey could give NATO its casus belli, its pretext for all all-out attack on Syria in violation of international law.

The warmongers in Washington have only one way of making a living nowadays —

and that is by selling arms to war-torn countries and then systematically looting their resources. (LD)

The neoconservative lie behind Washington’s wars of hegemony is that the US is bringing democracy to the invaded and bombed countries.

To paraphrase Mao, “democracy comes out of the barrel of a gun.”

However, the Arab Spring has come up short on democracy, as have Iraq and Afghanistan, two countries “liberated” by US democratic invasions.

What the US is bringing is civil wars and the breakup of countries, as President Bill Clinton’s regime achieved in former Yugoslavia.

The more countries can be torn into pieces and dissolved into rival factions, the more powerful is Washington.

Russia’s Putin understands that Russia itself is threatened not only by Washington’s funding of the “Russian opposition,” but also by the strife among Muslims unleashed by Washington’s wars against secular Muslim states, such as Iraq and Syria.

This discord spreads into Russia itself and presents Russia with problems such as Chechen terrorism.

When a secular state is overthrown, the Islamist factions become free to be at one another’s throats.

The internal strife renders the countries impotent.

As I wrote previously, the West always prevails in the Middle East because the Islamist factions hate one another more than they hate their Western conquerors.

Thus, when Washington destroys secular, non-Islamist governments as in Iraq and now targeted in Syria, the Islamists emerge and battle one another for supremacy.

This suits Washington and Israel as these states cease to be coherent opponents.

RUSSIA  SURROUNDED

The Russians are only too aware that the projected wars against Iran and Syria are proxy wars against them.

The Chinese know that they, too, are being covertly targeted by these attacks on their Iranian and Syrian allies.

Russia and China therefore have a stark choice: either to intervene and stop the planned destruction of Iran and Syria by the US, Israel and their camp followers in NATO and the Muslim world —

or else be next on the hit list. (LD)

Russia is vulnerable, because Putin is demonized by Washington and the US media and because Putin’s Russian opposition is financed by Washington and serves US, not Russian, interests.

The turmoil that Washington is unleashing in Muslim states leaks back to Russia’s Muslim populations.

It has proved to be more difficult for Washington to interfere in China’s internal affairs, although discord has been sowed in some provinces.

Several years from now, the Chinese economy is expected to exceed in size the US economy, with an Asian power displacing a Western one as the world’s most powerful economy.

Washington is deeply disturbed by this prospect.

In the thrall and under the control of Wall Street and other special interest business groups, Washington is unable to rescue the US economy from its decline.

The short-run gambling profits of Wall Street, the war profits of the military/security complex, and the profits from offshoring the production of goods and services for US markets have far more representation in Washington than the wellbeing of US citizens.

As the US economy sinks, the Chinese economy rises.

Washington’s response is to militarize the Pacific. The US Secretary of State has declared the South China Sea to be an area of American national interest.

The US is wooing the Philippine government, playing the China threat card, and working on getting the US Navy invited back to its former base at Subic Bay.

Recently there were joint US/Philippines military/naval exercises against the “China threat.”

AMERICA believes it has a right to establish bases all over the Pacific Ocean, threatening Chinese interests . . .

but would America like it if China established Chinese bases all over the Atlantic Ocean, threatening America? (LD)

The US Navy is reallocating fleets to the Pacific Ocean and constructing a new naval base on a South Korean island.

US Marines are now based in Australia and are being reallocated from Japan to other Asian countries.

The Chinese are not stupid. They understand that Washington is attempting to corral China.

For a country incapable of occupying Iraq after 8 years and incapable of occupying Afghanistan after 11 years, to simultaneously take on two nuclear powers is an act of insanity.

The hubris in Washington, fed daily by the crazed neocons, despite extraordinary failure in Iraq and Afghanistan, has now targeted formidable powers—Russia and China.

The world has never in its entire history witnessed such idiocy. The psychopaths, sociopaths, and morons who prevail in Washington are leading the world to destruction.

The criminally insane government in Washington, regardless whether Democrat or Republican, regardless of the outcome of the next election, is the greatest threat to life on earth that has ever existed.

AMERICA, YOU WILL DO AS I SAY!

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the REAL President of America — the man who runs the American Madhouse with the help of AIPAC and America’ s  Zionist organizations . . .

============================================

View all posts by Montecristo →

END

 

 

 

 

How the Israel lobby erodes US sovereignty

 

From Al Jazeera English

June 29, 2012

Ahmed Moor

Ahmed Moor 
Ahmed Moor is a Palestinian-American graduate student of Public Policy at Harvard University.

From writing laws to funding presidential campaigns, conservative Israelis have a strong pull on US politics.

Casino tycoon and Republican donor Sheldon Adelson has said he wished he had served in the Israeli military [Reuters]

The United States is a sovereign country. That is sometimes hard to remember.

Illinois Senator Mark Kirk had a stroke in January.

The serious neurological event sent him into surgery, where doctors excised two, tiny, damaged pieces of his brain.

By all accounts, the senator is now in great recovery, his office releasing a video in May, which showed him walking on a treadmill and describing his eagerness to “get back to work”

Yet it appears that he has already got back to it.

At the end of last month, Kirk sponsored an amendment to a Senate appropriations bill, seemingly intent on stripping the United Nations Relief and Works Agency of some of its funding.

His attempt to re-determine the definition of Palestinian refugees was met by stiff opposition from the State Department, but the senator prevailed – a considerable feat for a recovering patient.

The amendment requires the State Department to distinguish between and report on how many of those Palestinians who receive assistance from UNRWA were personally displaced from their homes as a result of the 1948 war, and those who are their descendants – which the UN agency continues to count as refugees, unable to return to their ancestral homes.

Ha’aretz reported that the senator had some help with his legislative burden, and not only from his deputy chief of staff, Richard Goldberg.

It turns out that the amendment to the bill was first written by an Israeli politician.

Einat Wilf, a member of the Israeli parliament, reportedly spent months working with current and former AIPAC employees, including Steve Rosen –

who was once suspected by FBI agents of obtaining classified US government information and passing it on to Israeli officials – to deliver the language on Palestinian refugees to the US legislature.

In summary: a senator who suffered crippling neurological damage received legislation from an Israeli politician by way of AIPAC before he slipped it into a US bill that eventually became law.

In other words, an Israeli politician helped write a US law.

Then she boasted about it.

“I have nothing against the descendents of refugees and I’m not asking them to give up of their dream of returning,” Haaretz quoted Wilf as saying. “But if we want a two-state solution, UNWRA can’t continue to aid an inflation of refugees … It ends up harming peace.”

But that’s probably not worth getting overly excited about.

Foreign politicians have always written laws for their US counterparts (not really).

What they haven’t always done is finance US presidential races.

Sheldon Adelson is an American casino billionaire and owner of conservative Israeli daily newspaper Israel HaYom.

He is famous for spending $10m on Newt Gingrich’s presidential bid.

A veteran, he is also famous for saying, “the uniform that I wore in the military, unfortunately, was not an Israeli uniform”.

In fairness, Adelson is not the only person in the US who thinks that wearing an Israeli uniform is terrific.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach – running for New Jersey’s ninth US Congressional district – recently gushed about his own relationship with the Israeli army.

Anyway, Adelson’s generous contribution to the Gingrich effort came after the then-candidate proclaimed that the Palestinians were an “invented” people.

The campaign failed to convince Republicans that scandal and profligacy are good for the party, and when Gingrich failed, Adelson found a new champion.

The New York Times reported that he offered an additional $10m to the Romney campaign.

The money came after a suggestion that the billionaire may be willing to spend up to $100m to defeat Barack Obama.

To be sure, $100m is only 0.4 per cent of $25bn, Adelson’s estimated net worth.

So this is also not a big deal, unless foreign money is what’s buying US democracy.

In an interview condemning Adelson’s contributions, Senator John McCain said that “obviously, maybe in a roundabout way, foreign money is coming into an American campaign”.

All the big money and Israeli interference is coming at a time when US neoconservatives are pushing hard for a new war.

And they can only push as hard as they do because they have successfully purged the Republican Party of whatever sanity it possessed – a phenomenon Pat Buchanan recently highlighted

The administration is reportedly fighting against a war with Iran.

And to the president’s mind, the best way to do that is by embedding the Israelis in the US national security apparatus.

For example, the head of the US delegation to the P5+1 non-proliferation talks recently flew from Baghdad to Tel Aviv. 

According to an unnamed US source, “we updated the Israelis in detail before we updated our own government”.

So, to summarise again: Israelis are helping write US laws, funding US campaigns, and helping craft US war-making policy.

What is left for Americans to do?

Well, to fight the wars, of course.

===================================================

 Ahmed Moor is a Palestinian-American graduate student of Public Policy at Harvard University and co-editor of After Zionism (Saqi Books, July 2012).

END

 

 

 

 

Department of Homeland Security Plans to Release Bacteria in Boston Subway System

=================================================

{XANIEL’S NOTE : It is not unheard of for these monsters to use the open public as live Genie pigs. 

It does not matter to them who gets sick and/or dies.

After all, the whole point of these releases is not to find cures, it is to depopulate and make money along the way!

Read the next story after this one to get the full impact of this overwhelming ‘ Crime Against Humanity ‘!}~~Xaniel777

==================================================

From the Trenches

Posted on June 30, 2012 by Admin


Liberty Chatter  The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has announced a series of biological tests that they will be conducting in subway systems near Boston.

DHS will be releasing bacteria into the MBTA tunnels, in what they say are tests to evaluate sensors installed in the tunnel system.

The DHS sensors are designed to detect biological agents.

The testing is expected to go on for at least one year, with multiple bacteria releases every month.

DHS officials insist that the bacteria release, a dead bacteria called B-subtilis, will have no adverse health risks on healthy individuals.  

What this means for people with compromised immune systems isn’t known, DHS hasn’t publicly commented on that.

B-subtilis is a Gram-positive, catalase-positive bacterium commonly found in soil.

Although DHS insists that are no health risks, the EPA fact sheet does show some negative health effects associated with this bacteria.

B. subtilis does produce an extracellular toxin known as subtilisin.

Although subtilisin has very low toxigenic properties (Gill, 1982), this proteinaceous compound is capable of causing allergic reactions in individuals who are repeatedly exposed to it.

B. subtilis has also been implicated in several cases of food poisoning(Gilbert et al., 1981 and Kramer et al., 1982 as cited by Logan, 1988).

It goes on to say that in those with compromised immune systems:

Infections attributed to B. subtilis include bacteremia, endocarditis,pneumonia, and septicemia.

According to DHS,(their documents can be seen on the DHS website here)

Several subway systems across the country were considered to host the proposed pilot test.

Preliminary discussions were held with a few subway systems, and the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority (MBTA) was considered to be an optimal location due to the extensive chemical simulant studies that were recently performed there.

Department of Homeland Security Plans to Release Bacteria in Boston Subway System.

http://offgridsurvival.com/feed/rss/

Off Grid Survival – Wilderness & Urban Survival Skills

Online Survivalist information on survival topics and Off Grid Living.

From Wilderness Survival and Hiking information to Backpacking and Off Grid Living we are your source for surviving any situation.

http://www.bearflagtrading.com/2012/05/department-of-homeland-security-plans-to-release-bacteria-in-boston-subway-system/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+bearflagtrading%2FUCMP+%28Bear+F

END 

 

 

 

 

WHO Admits to Releasing Pandemic Virus into Population via ‘Mock-Up’ Vaccines

Mercola.com

From Mercola.com

September 03 2009 

vaccine, pandemic virus

The document on the WHO website linked below states that it is common procedure to release pandemic viruses into the population in order to get a jump ahead of the real pandemic, so as to fast track the vaccine for when it is needed.

In Europe, some manufacturers have conducted advance studies using a so-called “mock-up” vaccine.

Mock-up vaccines contain an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations and thus mimics the novelty of a pandemic virus.

According to the website, “Such advance studies can greatly expedite regulatory approval.”

On June 11 the World Health Organization (WHO) raised its swine flu pandemic alert from a 5 to a 6.

Phase 6 is the highest level alert, and reflects the speed with which a virus is spreading — not its severity.

This classification also allows for a vaccine to qualify for a “fast-track” procedure for licensing and approval, and this process is now ongoing for the swine flu vaccine.

What you may not know, however, is that WHO, together with health officials, regulatory authorities and vaccine manufacturers, have been working since 2007 – long before this new “threat” of swine flu emerged – to “explore a broad range of issues surrounding the regulatory approval of pandemic vaccines.”

According to the WHO website:

“Ways were sought to shorten the time between the emergence of a pandemic virus and the availability of safe and effective vaccines.”

One such method used in Europe is to conduct advance studies using a “mock-up” vaccine that contains an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations.

When testing these mock-up vaccines, it is very possible to release the novel influenza virus into the population, as its purpose is to “mimic the novelty of a pandemic virus” and “greatly expedite regulatory approval.”

Government officials have other tricks up their sleeves to ensure these new, barely tested vaccines easily make it to market as well, such as:

  • Labeling the vaccine a “strain change” rather than an entirely “new” vaccine. 

    This method states the new vaccine has built on technology used to produce vaccines for seasonal influenza, and the change for the pandemic vaccine is similar to a strain change used to produce a new seasonal vaccine each flu season.

In the United States, vaccine manufacturers are required to submit fewer data if they already have a licensed flu vaccine and will use the same manufacturing process for the pandemic vaccine.

  • Using a “rolling review procedure.” This allows manufacturers to submit sets of data for regulatory review “as they become available.” 

    In other words, they’re free to distribute the vaccine and then submit the safety data later on.

Would You Want a Fast-Tracked Vaccine Injected Into Your Body?

By very definition, fast-tracked vaccines are those that have received very little safety testing prior to being used. So any time you agree to get one, you are essentially a guinea pig.

Vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline has actually stated:

“Clinical trials will be limited, due to the need to provide the vaccine to governments as quickly as possible. Additional studies will therefore be required and conducted after the vaccine is made available.”

And WHO likewise says:

“Time constraints mean that clinical data at the time when pandemic vaccines are first administered will inevitably be limited. Further testing of safety and effectiveness will need to take place after administration of the vaccine has begun.”

Why would anyone who knows the facts sign up for a vaccine that really needs further safety studies … but won’t receive them until AFTER it’s already been given out? By then it will be too late.

So please realize that if you or your child receive a swine flu vaccine, you will be acting as a TEST subject.

Remember this vaccine will not be made using the methods of the past. In order to speed up the cultivation of the virus and the manufacturing process, they’re using human liver cells instead of chicken eggs.

Whether this new procedure is better or worse than the old method, I can’t say … but it’s never been used before and they have not had time to conduct any human testing.

So, it’s a giant game of Russian Roulette that you simply want to avoid.

Nearly all of the vaccines created will also include thimerosal (mercury), and the toxic adjuvant squalene, both of which have been clearly shown to carry significant health risks.

You should know, too, that vaccine makers and federal officials have been rendered immune from lawsuits.

Should anything go wrong with this current vaccine they will not have to pay a single cent to anyone!

Squalene Update as of October 2009:

According to Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the NVIC, none of the H1N1 vaccines being distributed in the United States contain squalene or other oil in water adjuvants. 

We successfully made enough fuss about the potential danger of fast tracking licensure of squalene adjuvants into US H1N1 vaccines under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that can be invoked during a declared public health emergency that the FDA has NOT licensed these adjuvants for the U.S.

There is squalene in H1N1 vaccines licensed in Europe but not yet in the U.S.

That is not to say the vaccine manufacturers will not try to get the adjuvants inserted into vaccines in the future, but for now we have won on this point.

 

Who Stands to Benefit From the Swine Flu Pandemic (and Future Pandemics)?

This is the question you need to ask yourself when you hear the media dishing out the latest statistics about the swine flu pandemic.

In the last few days alone, I’ve seen major news outlets warning that come flu season, the swine flu could kill 90,000 Americans and hospitalize 2 million.

This sounds a lot like the fear-mongering that went on during the Bird Flu pandemic (that never materialized) back in 2005

Back then scientists and governments were congratulating themselves for averting a threat that never was by stockpiling worthless vaccines.

Now I’m having déjà vu.

In response to this newest swine flu pandemic, what did the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently suggest?

Swine flu shots for all! Of course, what else would you expect?

As the Washington Post reported, CDC said: “As soon as a vaccine is available, try to get it for everyone in your family.”

Well, you might be tempted to do just that if you believe the sensational number of swine flu deaths they’re predicting.

But, really, these numbers are not based on facts.

WHO continues to define the severity of the H1N1 virus to be moderate, generally defined as an illness requiring neither hospitalization nor even medical care.

Most cases are having MILD symptoms that clear up on their own.

Further, no one really knows for sure just how many cases of swine flu there are, because some countries are no longer confirming them by lab.

In the UK, for example, they now appear to be collecting swine flu data online and via the phone, based on nothing but self-assessment.

So did they really contract the swine flu?

Or did the vast majority of them simply have a case of the sniffles or a seasonal flu bug?

Without laboratory confirmation, no one will ever know, but they sure are using those numbers to scare you!

Going back to my original question though, you must ask yourself who stands to benefit from all of this paranoia and hysteria.

Of course you know the answer to this one.

Big Pharma … which stands to gain up to $49 billion a year on the swine flu vaccine alone plus an infinite amount on top of that for future pandemic vaccines.

The vaccine manufacturers would love for every man, woman, and child to heed the CDC’s advice to get vaccinated. But now you know better.

The swine flu is typically a mild illness.

The swine flu vaccine has not been tested for safety or efficacy, but we DO know it will contain harmful additives.

The choice, to me, is obvious.

And in the future, anytime a new “pandemic” appears and officials urge you to rush out and get a shot, please remember this article and ask yourself if it’s really you who stands to benefit from their advice.

 ==========================================================

{ XANIEL’S NOTE :  Even though we just ran the story below, it is still a little ‘ Jewel of FYI ‘ to all who have not yet seen it :

=======================

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY – Dr Robert Gallo

Uploaded by  on Dec 2, 2011

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY – Dr Robert Gallo

Courtesy: Dr Leonard Horovitz [in the interests of extending Human Educational knowledge].

AIDS was deliberately created to deliberately depopulation development of humanity –

created at Fort Dietrick through US Bioweapons development.


END

 

 

 

 

Mother Who Questions Vaccine at Hospital Has Newborn Taken Away

 

From America First

July 01, 2012

This story is appalling, and the worst part is we know this happens often. 

Newborns are snatched away from mothers at hospitals and in assembly-line fashion, given all kinds of invasive tests and vaccinations without parental approval. 

Or, if the approval is given, it’s right after a mother has gone through the stressful birth process, and the hospital team pressures her by telling her the baby is in danger. 

Ricki Lake made a good film (kind of graphic) about this process called The Business of Being Born

It’s a must see for expecting couples before they make birthing decisions. 

What kind of nation do we have when we allow the government to take our children from us seconds after they are born?

I am having a great deal of trouble typing this post.  I am so upset and outraged over what was done to Jodi Ferris and her baby at the Penn State Hershey Medical Center in Pennsylvania shortly after she gave birth that I am having difficulty staying composed enough to write a coherent story.

If you recall, this is the same area of the state where officials allowed a serial child molester like Jerry Sandusky,

former Penn State assistant football coach, to go free for decades and continue to abuse children unfortunate enough to come across his lecherous path while a mother who gives birth in a government hospital has her baby taken away for questioning whether vaccination with Hep B is truly necessary.

Does something seem very very wrong with this picture?

Jodi and Scott Ferris’ Story

Jodi had hoped to have a homebirth. 

After going into labor early and given the distance to the nearest hospital, Jodi and her husband Scott were advised by their midwife to call an ambulance and get to the hospital.

Jodi and Scott’s baby girl was born in the ambulance in the parking lot of Hershey Medical Center. 

Attending personnel at the government run facility took charge of “Annie” and Jodi very quickly.

Jodi was unable to see and hold Annie after the birth and hospital personnel were totally unresponsive when she continued to inquire about her newborn.  

Jodi was also given an injection of oxytocin without first being told what it was. 

Hospital personnel only inquired whether she was allergic after the injection was given.

Jodi’s persistent inquires about Annie continued to go unheeded. 

She was simply told that “she is in good hands and you’ll be able to see her soon”.

Finally, a doctor told Jodi that Annie had scored a 9 out of 10 on the APGAR test given to newborns which was very good considering that an 8 or above indicates a healthy child.

A short time later, a different doctor told Jodi that Annie was very sick and would need to stay in the hospital. 

This doctor also arrogantly indicated his dislike for midwives with the comment “too many people think they know what they’re doing”.

About an hour after being told Annie was very sick, Annie was finally brought to Jodi. 

She was told Annie was doing well and would be able to go home shortly.

Baby Detained at Hospital For No Medical Reason

A few hours later, the story changed yet again as another hospital staffer told Jodi and Scott that Annie would have to remain in the hospital for 48-72 hours for observation.

When they inquired why, they were told that the “law” required Annie to stay for at least 48 hours.

There is no such law in Pennsylvania, by the way.

After consulting with risk management about why Annie had to stay at the hospital, it was admitted that even though Annie was fine and there was no reason she couldn’t go home, 

she was being held prisoner at the hospital for 48-72 hours not for any health reasons but out of concern that if anything went wrong after Annie was discharged that the hospital might get sued.

Hospital risk management ultimately relented and said a 24 hour waiting period was sufficient and that Jodi and Scott could stay with their baby overnight.

Read the rest at: http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/mother-who-questions-vax-at-hospital-has-newborn-taken-away/

END

 

 

 

 

Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments »

REAL NEWS June 29, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 28, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : June 29, 2012

===========================================================================

Here’s a statement I found at Mike Rivero’s ‘ What Really Happened.com ‘, that Americans should read and remember who we are :

“Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom.

Congress have no power to disarm the militia.

Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…

[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments,

but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” –

– Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.

=========================================================================================

 

Rubio: IRS to ‘come after’ uninsured Americans

{ XANIEL’S NOTE : This is just what Romney needed to take the election away from Obama.

We are enough trouble with this current President, but if , ‘ Romney gets elected, GOD HELP US ALL !!’

What really surprises me, is Obama actully thinks he did something great and won something here.

Instead he has pushed this Country closer to ‘ The Second American Relvoution. ‘

The First Black President in the History of the United States, will no doubt be the last President of the United States!

From this point on, you can except the States ( over short time of each other) to start Seceding from the rest of the Nation.

My best guess is, that this once great Nation will split itself into 5 (five) to 7 (seven) New Republics,

with NO U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT attached to any of them.

‘ Rest in Peace U.S.A. ‘ 

Let’s all thank ‘ Barry ‘ people!

May History spit upon you Barry ( the Obama ) Soetoro }~~Xaniel777

========================================================================

From POLITICO

By MJ LEE | 6/28/12

Sen. Marco Rubio said Thursday that the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold President Barack Obama’s health care law means that the IRS will now “come after” Americans.

“I hope people back home fully understand what this means, and here’s what this means: It is now unlawful for you not to buy health insurance, and if you do not buy it, you have an IRS problem,” the Florida Republican said on Fox News.

“If you do not buy health insurance, the IRS is going to be on your back and chasing you. They’re going to take away your refund, they’re going to increase your fees, they’re going to come after you.”

Rubio argued that millions of Americans will face being “out of compliance” with the IRS for not having health insurance coverage.

“Somehow the Obama administration thinks that’s a victory,” he said. “That’s everything you need to know about that administration.”

The high court ruled Thursday that Congress did not overstep its power by requiring almost all Americans to buy health insurance.

The justices ruled that Congress has the authority to impose the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate through its taxing power.

In his interview on Fox News, Rubio said he wants Democrats and Republicans to agree on a need to “start from scratch.”

“I hope that even the Democrats in the Senate will realize — I hope this is not what they intended, and will repeal this thing and let’s start from scratch, replacing it with some common sense approaches that somehow doesn’t put all of these millions of Americans at odds and at war with the IRS,” he said.

(See also: Full coverage of the health care reform decision)

Rubio, a first-term senator who won his seat in 2010, said the high court’s decision has put the politics surrounding health care “back where we were when I ran for office.”

“One of the central issues of the campaign was this real anger at the overreach of the Obama administration on this health care law,” he said. “I think this now becomes a central issue again.”

He added, “This is one more piece of evidence that the Obama administration is hurting economic growth in America.”

Rubio appeared on CNN shortly after and repeated that the decision could give Americans “an IRS problem.”

“It is a loss for America. Let me begin by reminding everybody what the Supreme Court decides is they decide whether something is a constitutional or not constitutional. They don’t decide whether this is a good idea. And it’s specific, and when they found that it was constitutional what they said was the reason why it’s constitutional is because it is a tax increase. Millions of Americans may now have an IRS problem as a result of the ruling,” he told CNN’s Candy Crowley.

“This is now turning the IRS into an enforcement mechanism for Obamacare,” he added.

Rubio also said he was not concerned about the political ramifications of the court’s decision for Mitt Romney.

“Let me first mention that when Governor Romney was the governor of a state, that is the state policy. If you don’t like the policies of the state, you can easily go to another state, and the state, by the way, does not have the IRS,” he said.

(Also on POLITICO: Kennedy slams ‘vast judicial overreaching’)

END

 

 

 

 

 Cantor: House will vote on repeal on health care law on July 11

 

From POLITICO

 By SEUNG MIN KIM | 6/28/12

LINK TO VIDEO HERE 

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said Thursday that the Republican-led House will vote on repealing the health care law soon after the July 4 recess.

Cantor, who sets the floor schedule in the House, said in a statement that the House will vote on the repeal the week of July 9 – which Cantor said will clear the path for “patient-centered reforms that lower costs and increase choice.”

(PHOTOS: 21 landmark SCOTUS rulings)

“The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold ObamaCare is a crushing blow to patients throughout the country,” Cantor said. “ObamaCare has failed to keep the President’s basic promise of allowing those who like their health care to keep it, while increasing costs and reducing access to quality care for patients.”

UPDATE: Cantor said in a follow-up Tweet that the vote will be July 11.

 END

 

 

 

 

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY – Dr Robert Gallo

 

Uploaded by  on Dec 2, 2011

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY – Dr Robert Gallo

Courtesy: Dr Leonard Horovitz [in the interests of extending Human Educational knowledge].

AIDS was deliberately created to deliberately depopulation development of humanity – created at Fort Dietrick through US Bioweapons development.

END

 

 

 

 

US Supreme Court Rules against We the People

 

From the Trenches

Posted on June 27, 2012 by Henry Shivley


One of the consolations being offered to the Ron Paul supporters by the Campaign for Liberty is the assertion that, though we may not succeed in getting the GOP ticket for Dr. Paul, we will make “great inroads” in electing patriotic local representatives, who in accordance with the theory, will pass local legislation designed to protect our Constitution and our rights.

On Monday, the so called Supreme Court of the United States destroyed all illusions of correcting the problems within our nation from the bottom up, as key portions of Arizona’s immigration law was struck down by the treasonous insurgent soviet socialists sitting on the Supreme Court.

The one provision that was upheld is effectively nullified simply through Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s refusal to enforce our federal immigration laws. 

The fact is the manner in which the treasonous court ruled will only encourage further invasion from the south.

Though the police in Arizona can, via reasonable suspicion, check the legal status of anyone they pull over for another offence, it is being reported that ICE will simply delay the transfer of information at the traffic stop to the point that the illegals will have to be let go.

Even if they are arrested they must be turned over to ICE who will let them go. 

 And if they are not let go, of course with the aid of the treasonous bastards that are supposed to be bringing them to justice, they will be, not only allowed, but encouraged, to sue the state for violation of their rights, making it absolutely clear that the perceived right of foreign nationals in our country illegally not to be detained outweighs the US nationals right to have a free and sovereign country and a constitutional Republic of, for, and by we the people.

This latest outrage is just another among a tidal wave of injustices being heaped upon us and any assertion that we the people can regain control of our country through anything short of a full blown revolution is a fantasy. 

We the people need to stop grasping for straws as we are being put to our knees. 

We need to stand up and assert our lawful authority to remove the treasonous insurgents within our government.

The only question left is how bad we are going to allow this thing to get before we act.

God bless the Republic, death to the international corporate mafia, we shall prevail.

END

 

 

 

 

Celente Launches 2nd American Revolution:

 Puts His Money Where His Heart Is

From LewRockwell

Trends Journal

June 26, 2012

KINGSTON, NY, 26 June 2012 – Gerald Celente’s forecast is clear – The 2nd American Revolution is on the horizon.

And this American Patriot has done more than just sign up to join the fight, he’s established its headquarters.

Inspired by its potent symbolic value, Celente has purchased the 1750s ,Franz Roggen House  a stately stone colonial set on the northeast corner of John and Crown Streets, in Kingston’s historic Stockade District.

This is the only intersection in the United States that boasts pre-revolutionary stone buildings on all four corners.

“Kingston played a critical role in the 1st American Revolution and was, for a short while, the capitol of New York State,” observes Celente. “Here is where I’m taking my stand to start the 2nd American Revolution.”

“The 1st American Revolution was fought with armies and bullets,” says Celente. “The 2nd American Revolution will not cost lives and limbs; it will be fought with mind and spirit.”

Celente is unequivocal: “America’s democratic political system is degenerate, corrupt and ineffective. It cannot be patched up or papered over.

Rather, it must be renewed, revived, and reconfigured from the ground up,” he says. “The potential for positive and sweeping change is there. It can happen, but it has to be made to happen.”

How? First, “We the people” must be made aware of the urgent need for real change.

Then “we” must learn to accept and embrace the concept of a full-scale intellectual revolution.

“The time is ripe, Americans are ‘mad as hell and not going to take it anymore,’” says Celente, who predicts that the November election will be the turning point. “The polls prove it. There is little enthusiasm for either candidate and, once again, Americans will be left with no choice other than the choice of the lesser of two evils.”

“Stay Home, Don’t Vote!”

Celente’s Revolutionary call to arms begins with a voter’s strike. “Stay Home, Don’t Vote” is his campaign slogan. “People have been conned into believing that if you don’t vote you’ve lost the right to complain. That’s political baloney,” fumes Celente. “The true case is exactly the opposite.

This is a two-headed, one party system. Republican or Democrat, considering their track records, it’s clear nothing can be expected from either Presidential candidate other than the perpetuation of the destructive and criminal policies that have brought America to its current state of perpetual crisis and socioeconomic decline. Ditto for Congress.”

“What self-respecting person would cast a vote for a lesser of two evils?” asks Celente. “Not only is it immoral and undignified, it’s destructive. Lesser or greater, evil is evil.

By supporting one evil or the other, the voter becomes an accessory to the crime. Only a true intellectual revolution can restore dignity, trust, morality, decency and compassion.”

“Anything else is just more of the same. Stay Home, Don’t Vote!”

As far as Celente is concerned, “We can change course, restore our country and regain our independence. United, the American people have the power to prevail and create a more ‘perfect Union.’”

======================================

Copyright © 2012 Gerald Celente

Gerald Celente is founder and director of The Trends Research Institute, author of  Trends 2000 and  Trend Tracking (Warner Books), and publisher of The Trends Journal. He has been forecasting trends since 1980, and recently called “The Collapse of ’09.”


END

 

 

 

 

10 Disturbing SHTF Threats that most Preppers Haven’t Prepared For

 

Off Grid Survival

From OFF GRID SURVIVAL

June 22, 2012

When planning for a SHTF scenario, there’s really only one thing that we can be sure of;  Survival will be a bigger challenge than you ever believed possible.

While you can defiantly take measures to prepare yourself for what’s to come, when you’re talking about a SHTF scenario, all bets are really off.

Here are 10 things that you may have never considered when planning for a SHTF survival situation.

Law Enforcement Issues

1. No Law Enforcement

military troops

During an extreme SHTF scenario, it is very likely that law enforcement and emergency responders will be nonexistent.

Even during small scale disasters, law enforcement officers often leave to take care of their own families first.

When things go bad (empty grocery stores, no utilities, mass riots, violence, etc.) you are more than likely going to have to defend yourself.

2. Fake Law Enforcement

In a SHTF Scenario you need to be on the lookout for everything including people impersonating law enforcement and military personnel.

During a catastrophic event, you will most likely see criminals preying on the innocent by pretending to be either police or military officers.

You have to be able to quickly determine who is who, or stay away from people at all costs.

3. Law Enforcement and the Military Will Try to Take Your Guns.

Think it can’t happen? It already has!

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans Police Superintendent Eddie Compass ordered all local law enforcement, including the U.S. Marshalls office and the National Guard, to seize all civilian firearms.

Without warrants, armed National Guard troops and New Orleans law enforcement officials forcibly confiscated over 1,000 legal firearms from law abiding citizens.

The New Orleans gun confiscation should serve as a warning to how the government and law enforcement officials will react during a large scale national disaster.

 It is extremely likely that they will come for your guns!

Personal Safety Issues

4. Gangs & Raiders

Prepper Image

If things go bad, there will likely be more people who mean to do you harm than there will be people who are prepared.

This is something that you must accept and learn to deal with. 

The fact is, most people have no idea what it really takes to survive and once their safety net is removed they will become increasingly desperate and unpredictable.

Let’s face it, even during the good times there’s a certain segment of our population that’s just downright insane.

From the idiots who go nuts and riot after their team loses a game, to the violent criminals and gangs who are already terrorizing big cities throughout America, there’s little doubt that a total collapse would make urban living almost impossible.

5. You need to be able to Defend Yourself.

During an extreme emergency situation the lunatics of the world are going to be roaming the streets looking for easy victims to target. 

If you’re serious about survival, you need to train yourself in multiple self-defense styles and techniques.

This means arming yourself with not only weapons, but also with the knowledge of how to defend yourself without them.

Sanitation Issues

Sanitation

6. Garbage will become a Killer.

This is a topic that’s not often discussed, but it’s one that will probably become a real problem during a SHTF situation.

Often, people who talk about urban survival worry about things like raiders and roaming gangs, but the real danger might actually come from something that you already have in your home  –Garbage

7. You have to Stock up on Sanitation Items

When planning to survive in any long-term survival situation, one thing that’s often overlooked is the dangers associated with a lack of adequate sanitation.

I know it’s not a pleasant thing to think about, but this one issue has the potential to kill more people than any other survival topic that we can talk about.

Mental & Physical Health Issues

8. Maintaining a Positive Mental Attitude during a Survival Situation

The ability to maintain a positive mental attitude during a survival situation is something that needs to be taking seriously.

It’s also something that you need to start working on now, before the SHTF.

Making it through a survival scenario often comes down to how well you can control your emotions.

Keeping a positive frame of mind, even in the face of an unthinkable threat, will help you process what’s happening and will help you respond to the situation without giving into fear.

9. You must be prepared to face a number of physical and mental challenges.

From dealing with a lack of sleep and inadequate hydration, to coping with hunger pains and other stressors, survival can take a huge toll on your body.

One of the best things you can do to ensure your survival, in just about any situation, is to make sure your body and your mind are trained to survive. This means motivating yourself to get off your butt and get in shape now, before it’s to late.

Communication Issues

10. You will be cut off from the outside World.

Teotwawki

In a survival situation, knowledge is going to be a critical factor in determining the ultimate outcome of your situation.

The ability to be able to predict what will happen in a survival situation is an important part of being prepared and often comes down to your ability to send and receive information.

When the power lines go down and the radio stations stop transmitting, there’s one line of communication that will still be alive and well.

 Having a good Multiband Ham Radio will allow you to send and receive critical emergency information during a disaster.

It’s also a great way to find alternative news sources from around the world.

END

 

 

 

 

1961 – A Jewish Defector Warns America!!!

 

From the Trenches

Posted on June 27, 2012 by David2


The Vatic Project  Vatic Note:  I cannot believe the hidden history that I am falling onto by accident.

 This is another major big eye opener.  

I want to thank the pragmatic Witness for finding this and publishing it.  

This is what happens when you  go down rabbit holes looking for something else…. and history jumps up and kicks you in the toosh.  

This great Jewish man, through an attack of conscience and his love for his adopted country, The United States of America,  came clean in 1961 in a spontaneous speech he gave  and its revealing.

What courage and integrity he had.  Something that has been disappearing here,  like real clouds.

He literally tells us these so called “Jews” are really Khazars but he uses the term Jews because that is what every one else calls them.  

Now this is in 1961.  Unbelievable.

If I had tried to post this  10 years ago, no one would have listened, but today its our new reality.  

He warned us and told us clearly what, how and how long this had been going on.  

We did not listened, and I probably would have been banned like I was for saying Goldman sachs was the culprit we needed to focus on, and that is why we started the blog, to stop the censorship and banning we were getting.

 Anyway, read this eye opening speech.  

It is a necessary knowledge that we need to deal with oursituation and how to overcome it.  

We are clearly running out of time.  

Soldiers patrolling American city streets in Missouri.

A Jewish Defector Warns America

 by Pragmatic Witness,  

 A Speech given By Benjamin H. Freedman in 1961 

Publishers (Prag Witness) Introductory Note: Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. 

He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. 

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation.

Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. 

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.

Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman’s essential message to us — his warning to the West — is more urgent than ever before. — K.A.S.

FREEDMAN’S SPEECH :

HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. (VN:  Because this was given back in 1961, it was not known yet or not shown the satanism that was prevalent within the khazar Zionists agenda and behind the scenes as we saw with the ancient bloodlines that we covered on here this past 2 weeks.

 So keep that in mind when you read about “Co-religionists, since they are not religious as we know it.)

For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country.

Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914.

There are few people here my age who remember that.

Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually.

The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean.

Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week’s food supply — and after that, starvation.

At that time, the French army had mutinied.

They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme.

The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn’t want to play war anymore, they didn’t like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany.

And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms.

They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis.

That means: “Let’s call the war off, and let room.

There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war.

We were railroaded into — if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into — that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine.

That is something that the people of the United States have never been told.

They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let’s have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.”

They didn’t know whether the war would last another year or another ten years.

So they started to work out a receipt.

The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn’t know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain’s promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war.

So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill.

I don’t think I could make it more emphatic than that. (VN: Britain needed the US to come into the war because they were losing it.  But the bankers, Rothschild, was winning once the US came into the war.)

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany.

You know what happened.

When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. 

I was there: I ought to know.

Now what happened?

The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, “How about Palestine for us?”

And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration.

So the Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh, so that was the game!
That’s why the United States came into the war.”

The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

 (VN: That was the first time they found out that it was all a conspiracy to stop Germany’s economic growth, that both Britain and the US, wanted to stop, especially Britain and the Zionists wanted their Palestine and we published how Rothschild had spent 220,000 dollars in those days for Palestinian land.

 Then not too long ago we published another blog about the same situation arising after Hitler came into power and Germany was growing economically, which the British seemed to hate.  

Churchill quotes were included in the blog confirming their desire to put Germany down again for the same reason)

That brings us to another very interesting point.

When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it.

Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany.

You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry andfinance as is Bernard Baruch in this country.

You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd’s and the Hamburg-American Lines.

You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family.

You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers — the biggest in the world.

The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that.

The Germans felt: “Well, that was quite a sellout.”

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union.

And we were winning.

And we told the Soviet Union: “Well, let’s quit. We offer you peace terms. Let’s forget the whole thing.”

And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union.

And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat.

A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man’s imagination cannot encompass.

Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us.

How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese?

I don’t think that one of them would dare show his face on any street.

There wouldn’t be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that’s how the Germans felt towards these Jews.

They’d been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany.

And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely.

And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers —

and the press was filled with their statements —

that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war.

The Jews themselves admitted that.

It wasn’t that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer.

There was no religious feeling.

There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief.

It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious.

Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said “Shema’ Yisroel” or “Our Father.”

Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States.

Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible.

They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy.

They built up world trade.

You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth.

Three hundred separate little political entities.

And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state.

And within 50 years they became one of the world’s great powers.

Their navy was rivalling Great Britain’s, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products.

What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany.

There isn’t one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it.

But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed.

Not a single hair.

Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.

They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists.

Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time.

And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days.  

Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days.

In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar.

So he fled to Holland for safety, for security.

After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone’s head.

They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor.

They didn’t fight one another with pistols.

Well, that’s the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany.

And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews.

About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews.

And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact.

They didn’t want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

 The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews.

They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could.

They shunned them.

The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam.

Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933.

And they said to Germany: “You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can’t treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you.”

You can imagine what the Germans told them.

So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said,

“The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business.”

And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany’s food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported.

So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany’s population would have to starve.

There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population.

Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that “this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration,”

which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time.

Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn’t find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words “made in Germany” on it.

In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked “made in Germany,”

they were picketed with signs saying “Hitler,” “murderer,” and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.

At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked “made in Germany.”

Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I’ve been observing women’s legs for many years and it’s been a long time since I’ve seen any cotton stockings on them.

I saw Macy’s boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying “murderers,” “Hitlerites,” and so forth.

Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany.

There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, “Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?” They naturally resented it.

Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews.

Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be?

Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn’t until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany.

And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don’t like to use the word “anti-Semitism” because it’s meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I’ll have to use it.

The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott.

Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive.

In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between.

And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible.

And they started to re-arm.

In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union.

The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that “Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong.”

The same as we in this country are saying today, “Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong.”

Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense.

Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination.

I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT.

Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed.

Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now?

If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished.

Why might such a war take place? 

It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. 

The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government.

That is just as true as I am standing here.

Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son’s.

Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don’t know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe.

Did you know it at that time?

Not a person in the United States knew it.

You weren’t permitted to know it.

Who knew it?

President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it?

I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there.

I was “confidential man” to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer.

So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson’s brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.

Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand.

President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby.

That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept.

They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered.

For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their “commonwealth.”

They’ve fooled you so much that you don’t know whether you’re coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, “Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony.”

I don’t know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury.

If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don’t call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.)

The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world’s population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars.

They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia.

And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe.

They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries.

The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe — so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers.

That’s how big and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now.

But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world.

The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith — either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism.

By spinning a top, and calling out “eeny, meeny, miney, moe,” he picked out so-called Judaism.

And that became the state religion.

He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews.

There wasn’t one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land.  

(VN:  actually as we proved on here through subsequent research, that they picked Judaism because they were forced to choose by the west and by the east who were invading them for their lack of moral ethics in business, funny how somethings never change. Remember they controlled the silk road between east and west) 

Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time.

Not one of them!

And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, “You want to help repatriate God’s Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don’t you?

It’s your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior.

You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we’re Jews.”

But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted.

It is as ridiculous to call them “people of the Holy Land,” as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems “Arabs.”

Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief.

Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed’s birthplace.

Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves “Arabs.”

You would say they were lunatics.

Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy.

All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia.

The same as the Irish.

When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants.

They hadn’t become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe.

Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter.

Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain.

So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. 

Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, “We’re going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God’s Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land.”

Could there be a bigger lie than that?

Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie.

You’d believe black is white if you heard it often enough.

You wouldn’t call black black anymore — you’d start to call black white.

And nobody could blame you.

That is one of the great lies of history.

It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.

 Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them?

I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I’m not here to be a rabble-rouser. I’m here to give you facts.

When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite.

It is the only prayer for which you stand.

You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre.

In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void.

The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge.

They shall have no force or effect.

And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them.

How much can you depend on their loyalty?

You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.

 We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.

 

END

 

 

 

 

UK ready to take on Israel over fate of children clapped in irons

 

The Independent

From The Independent 

By Terri Judd – June 27, 2012

The Foreign Office revealed last night that it would be challenging the Israelis over their treatment of Palestinian children after a report by a delegation of senior British lawyers revealed unconscionable practices, such as hooding and the use of leg irons.

In the first investigation of its kind, a team of nine senior legal figures examined how Palestinians as young as 12 were treated when arrested.

Their shocking report Children in Military Custody details claims that youngsters are dragged from their beds in the middle of the night, have their wrists bound behind their backs, and are blindfolded and made to kneel or lie face down in military vehicles.

Children from the West Bank are held in conditions that could amount to torture, such as solitary confinement, with little or no access to their parents.

They can be forced to stay awake before being verbally as well as physically abused and coerced into signing confessions they cannot read.

The team – led by Sir Stephen Sedley, a former Court of Appeal judge – heard that “every Palestinian child is treated like a potential terrorist”.

In a damning conclusion, the report points out repeated breaches of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which prohibits cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

“We were sitting in court and saw a section of a preliminary hearing when a very young looking child, a boy, was brought in wearing a brown uniform with leg irons on. We were shocked by that. This was a situation where we had been invited into the military courts for briefings from senior judges,” explained one of the report’s authors, human rights barrister Greg Davies.

“To hold children routinely and for substantial periods in solitary confinement would, if it occurred, be capable of amounting to torture,” the report said.

Last night the Foreign Office, which backed the report, said it would be taking up the claims with the Israeli authorities:

“The UK government has had long-standing concerns about the treatment of Palestinian children in Israeli detention, and as a result decided to fund this independent report. While recognising that some positive recent steps have been made by the Israeli authorities, we share many of the report’s concerns, and will continue to lobby for further improvements.”

While the legal team said it was in no position to prove the truth of the claims of cruelty made repeatedly by Palestinian children, but denied by the Israeli authorities – which offered unprecedented access to the delegation – it pointed to the disparity in the law.

Israeli children must have access to a lawyer within 48 hours and cannot be imprisoned under the age of 14. But Palestinian children as young as 12 are jailed and can be kept for three months without legal representation.

Between 500 and 700 are jailed each year.

“The other shocking thing is they are incarcerated in breach of many conventions.

The practical effect is parents can’t get there because they can’t get permits,” said Marianna Hildyard QC.

While the investigating team welcomed improvements introduced by the Israeli authorities, both Palestinian and Israeli lawyers on the ground insisted much of it was “rhetoric ra ther than real change”.

Last night, Israeli Embassy spokesperson Amir Ofek said the country appreciated the efforts of the delegation but blamed Palestinians who “glorify terrorism”.

He said: “As a result [children] are frequently involved in lethal acts.

With the Palestinian Authority unable or unwilling to meet its obligation to investigate and prosecute these offences, Israel has no choice but to do so itself.

“Israel notes the detailed recommendations in the report and will study them closely as part of its ongoing efforts to find the most appropriate balance between preventing violence and treating perpetrators with humanity.”

The report details claims children are dragged from their beds, bound and blindfolded.

www.childreninmilitarycustody.org

To read the report click here

 ========================================================================

END

 

 

 

 

Another attack on the Second Amendment: UN Small Arms Treaty

 

From The PPJ Gazette

June 25, 2012 by ppjg

By Marti Oakley   

The United Nations, that bastion of self-enriching, bloated gas bags, will soon be holding a month long convention on the UN Small Arms TREATY between 192 nations.

Of course, Hillary Clinton is right in the middle of things in an effort to commit the US to this unconstitutional treaty.

Because this is a treaty, and not one of those federal corporate contract agreements the presidents are so fond of, it will have to be brought to the states for ratification (See U.S. Const. art. II, § . Section 3 provides the power to make treaties (with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate)) except I don’t believe that will ever happen. 

Some, never heard of before, political slight of hand will be given as the reason as to why ratification of the treaty by the states was by-passed.

Clinton will agree to the treaty on behalf of the US and Obama will sign it with great pleasure. 

For decades it has been the intent of the federal government to disarm lawful gun owners in the US.

Every possible excuse and reason has been used to try and sell the idea of striking down the 2nd Amendment by both partys. 

The actual intent is, by U.N. mandate to disarm private individual gun owners in America claiming a global treaty banning the ownership of small arms. 

Its all for world peace! 

It will make the military assaults on all nations far easier if the general population isn’t armed and able to mount even a limited defense.

Don’t look to the District of Criminals for help!

If you think other than a few Republicans and even fewer Democrats will half-heartedly object or stand to defend our constitution or our inalienable rights of any kind, much less the right to keep and bear arms, you are sadly mistaken. 

Both party’s have been equally active in their assaults on the constitution, with members of both partys actively promoting the militarization of local law enforcement against their respective communities. 

Our police and many sheriffs departments are now para-military organizations capable and willing to turn on their own communities in subservience to Homeland Security edicts and orders. 

Regarding this, the District of Criminals couldn’t be happier.

See: govtslaves.info

“This is the Treaty that will infringe on the US Constitution, the Second Amendment, and your right to self defense.

The United Nations and specially invited anti firearms rights groups who want to eliminate our firearms freedoms will be convening at the UN July 2nd through the 27th to draft a Treaty to accomplish the goal of regulating firearms and accessories, and ultimately the disarming all of America.”

Spain agreed with the drafters of the Treaty, with input from various international and US gun control groups, who want the “Urgent and essential” Treaty to;

“a) Include a golden rule that prohibits the authorization of arms transfers where there is a substantial risk that used to commit or facilitate the commission-¬ – serious violations of international human rights and international humanitarian law.

b) Allow a comprehensive coverage that includes controls on weapons, ammunition and related material and on ALL (emphasis added) transfers.

c) explicit regulation of solid systems of licensing, transparency and reporting.”

_______________________

We wouldn’t sell arms to the same countries we are fighting…would we?

Supposedly, this treaty will involve only the sale of small arms and military weapons to other countries. 

That’s never going to happen because the US has been selling arms to mid-eastern countrys for years on end, even as we waged wars on them.

What’s The Impact Of U.S. Arms Deals In The Middle East? (NPR Interveiw between Melissa Block and her guest William Hartung)

For the last three years we have sold military weapons valued at about $350 million to Bahrain with no questions asked, including helicopters, guns and ammunition.

The recent uprising in Egypt was accompanied by the use of teargas, the canisters stamped U.S.A.

Host Melissa Block speaks with arms export expert William Hartung.

He’s the director of the Arms and Security Initiative at the New America Foundation. 

From that interview:

Mr. HARTUNG: Well, I think on the low-end, the teargas probably caused the most uproar.

But over the years, a billion dollars or more every year, we were selling tanks, we were selling fighter planes, we were selling armored personnel carriers, things that were used sort of indirectly to close off the square, to buzz the demonstrators.

So, you know, not to the same degree of impact as the teargas, but certainly I think causing some ill feelings towards the United States for supporting the regime for so many years.

This interview only touched on a small number of ongoing arms deals which the US has engaged in for more than 30 years.

WE are the enemy our government fears

In preparation for the disarming of America, our law enforcement agencies now refer to the general public as [civilians]. 

That is a referenced military term. 

These same agencies now carry fully automatic rifles, and in some instance grenades. 

Cities are buying military tanks with ADS systems installed on them and many are buying drones to spy on their populations; drones which will be fully capable of being armed. 

Who is it they are preparing to wage war on?

And guess who it is that will show up at your door in full battle rattle to demand your guns? 

The UN?  Not hardly! 

Those who show up at your door (and they will show up) will be dressed in military gear meant for war.

  Since they will not be in Iraq or Afghanistan or any other country we are aggressively terrorizing……who is it they are preparing to wage war on

It appears this will be war on American soil with what used to be [American’s] dressed for war against the remaining American public. 

We are the enemy our government fears and we currently have the means to fight back against assaults by our own government.

There is not one of us who possesses the fire power or weaponry equivalent to what our own government is prepared to use against us to force us into submission. 

Still, this will not stop a great number of Americans from fighting back.

While this unconstitutional treaty is sold to the public, they will speak great volumes about how disarming everyone (except police, the military, special agents, special ops, FBI, CIA, NSA, and every other corporate federal agency) will help bring [peace] to the world, I don’t believe it will be quite that easy.

Peace will be the last thing the criminal gang on CRAPitol Hill will achieve here at home if they do not stand up to this assault on the 2nd Amendment.

END

 

 

 

 

Former Merck scientists file suit against Merck under False Claims Act

 

From NaturalNews

June 26, 2012 by: Rosemary Mathis, Vice President of Victim Support, SANE VAX, INC.

Merck

(NaturalNews) On April 27, 2012, a formal complaint was filed in the Eastern Pennsylvania Federal District Court accusing Merck of a longstanding scheme to mislead and defraud Government health authorities worldwide.

Two of Merck’s former employees have accused the pharmaceutical giant of marketing multivalent MMR vaccines under false pretenses. According to the complaint, these vaccines have been mislabeled, misbranded, adulterated and falsely certified as having a 95% efficacy rate.

Before the lawsuit was filed, 21 doctors 1 added their voices to other groups of doctors who are calling for MMR vaccines to be used as a regular booster every 4 – 8 years, in order to control mumps outbreaks.

These doctors all assume that the mumps component of all MMR vaccines have the 95 – 98% efficacy promised by Merck.

However, the court documents filed by two Merck virologists meticulously detail how Merck ostensibly manipulated test results for decades in order to create a false 95% efficacy rate for the mumps component of their multivalent MMR vaccines.

The former Merck virologists contend that the multivalent mumps component has a vastly reduced efficacy which is directly responsible for mumps outbreaks during the last decade which prompted international calls for MMR booster shots every 4 – 8 years.

Virologists Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski describe how Merck had to recertify the mumps component in 2000, in order to comply with regulatory requirements in order for the mumps component to be included in two new multivalent MMR vaccines.

The usual test, which had certified the mumps component’s efficacy in the 60’s, failed when used in 2000.

They claim the results were so low Merck decided to change its own test protocol by testing the vaccine against the weakened mumps vaccine virus instead of the wild (naturally circulating) mumps virus.

When that modification didn’t result in the desired 95% efficacy figure, Merck’s executive directors of vaccine research, Drs Alan Shaw and Emilio Emini, instructed Drs David Krah and Mary Yagodich to implement a vast array of modifications to testing procedures3, then, allegedly pressured both Krahling and Wlochowski to participate.

When these modifications also failed to demonstrate the desired 95% efficacy rate, it is alleged that Drs Shaw and Emini instructed Drs Krah and Yagovich to abandon “gold standard” testing, and implement a new procedure, supposedly with the agreement of FDA, which included adding animal antibodies to human blood samples taken both pre and post vaccination4.

By combining the very low levels of human antibodies with animal antibodies, a much higher total level of virus neutralization was obtained than could occur from human antibodies alone.

 The human antibody levels alone would never protect in the real world against wild mumps.

 But after adding animal antibodies, the human blood samples which had previously failed under the old “gold standard” testing were retested using the “enhanced” protocols and passed with flying colors.

New ‘enhanced’ tests showed 100% efficacy, not against wild mumps virus, but against the mumps vaccine virus.

However, combining the animal and human antibodies led to a new problem. In some of the tests more than 80% of pre-vaccine blood samples now showed up as immune.

Usually, the highest number of pre-vaccine immune results any scientist could expect is 10%.

Further manipulations of the animal antibody levels failed to bring the pre-vaccine blood test results down to the expected 10% levels.

According to the complaint, Merck then implemented additional ‘creative’ strategies to show a lack of seroconversion in immune samples in an attempt to reduce the pre-vax level to the expected 10% because had the FDA seen the high numbers of “immune” pre-vaccine samples they would have easily detected the fraudulent test procedures.

Krahling and Wlochowski worked with the same team conducting these tests, but were outraged at what they deemed to be gross scientific deception and fraudulent practices.

When Drs Krahling and Wlochowski attempted to stop what they saw as, “wholesale fabrication of test data to reach its preordained 95% efficacy threshold,” Merck allegedly made various attempts to prevent them, including threatening to jail Dr. Krahling should he inform the FDA.

Despite these efforts, Dr Krahling made numerous calls to FDA.

These calls remained unanswered until Dr. Krahling reported to the FDA that Dr. Krah had removed and/or destroyed Dr. Krahling’s evidence.

An FDA agent then came and interviewed Dr. Krah, who apparently told the agent whatever was necessary to allay their concerns. The agent made no attempt to interview any other personnel, check any facilities, laboratory notebooks, or samples to corroborate what had been reported to them.

The lawsuit claims that to this day, Merck has consistently misrepresented the potency by simply quoting the 40 year old data from the pre-MMR monovalent mumps vaccine, thereby misrepresenting the efficacy of four multivalent vaccines: MMR, MMRII, Europe’s MMRvaxpro, and ProQuad, which is MMR plus chickenpox.

According to the two whistleblowers, not only have all the multivalent MMR vaccines been sold under false pretenses, but, as a result of this LACK OF EFFICACY, there have been numerous mumps outbreaks worldwide prompting calls for regular MMR boosters throughout life.

These mumps outbreaks were predicted by Merck’s Dr Krah 6in 2001, yet Merck allegedly ‘willfully’ withheld this information from multiple governments while consistently claiming there was no need for a new mumps component.8 

The question is, “If the mumps component is actually 95% effective, as stated, would experts be calling for lifelong boosters every 4 – 8 years?”

Has Merck turned over a new leaf since the recent Vioxx Scandal?

Do they still put profit before people?

Read the complaint, follow the court case, examine the evidence, and decide for yourself.

References:
1. http://journals.cambridge.org

2. Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

3. See pgs 10 and 11 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

4. See page 12 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

5. See page 22 No. 64 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

6. See page27/d82; 28/85 and page 40 first two lines – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

7. See page 29/86 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

8. See page 29/87 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

By Hilary Butler, Contributing Author from New Zealand.

Please visit our site at http://sanevax.org/.

About the author:
THE SANE VAX MISSION is to promote Safe, Affordable, Necessary & Effective vaccines and vaccination practices through education and information. We believe in science-based medicine.

Our primary goal is to provide the information necessary for you to make informed decisions regarding your health and well-being.

We also provide referrals to helpful resources for those unfortunate enough to have experienced vaccine-related injuries. 

We are demanding the HPV vaccines be taken off the market until an independent study on their safety and efficacy has been conducted.

Until then, we are committing our efforts to an educational media campaign to alert the public about the dangers of the HPV vaccines. 

SANE Vax, Inc. is involved in the ground-breaking production of the One More Girl Documentary which will premier in 2012.

Please join our cause by contributing to this project by contacting Ryan Richardson, Producer at ryan@onemoregirlfilm.com.

For more information, please visit our site at http://sanevax.org/.

=================================================

Articles Related to This Article:

• Merck litigation strategy – destroy expert witnesses

• Leaked documents show Merck knew of Vioxx dangers, yet hid them for years

• Merck Caught in Massive Scientific Fraud as In-House Authors were Disguised as Independent Scientists (opinion)

• Former head of CDC lands lucrative job as president of Merck vaccine division (opinion)

• Merck caught in scandal to bury Vioxx heart attack risks, intimidate scientists and keep pushing dangerous drugs; Vioxx lawsuits now forming

• Merck employees had “hit list” of doctors they sought to “neutralize”, court documents reveal (opinion)

END

 

 

 

 

Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

 
%d bloggers like this: