DaniMartExtras, Too


Posts Tagged ‘fbi’

Reality Shift: Beginning of the End and the Reset Begins

Posted by Xaniel777 on December 1, 2015

Judge Anna Update – “Dear Federal Agents” – November 28, 2015

SOURCE:  Ascension With Mother Earth


Anna Maria Riezinger  (Anna Von Reitz)


November 28, 2015
Big Lake, Alaska

Dear Federal Agents:

I am addressing this letter in this way, because it is my understanding that it will be read by members of both the FBI and the US Marshals Service. It is also my understanding that you have available for examination a wet-ink signed copy of the illustrated affidavit of probable cause entitled “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” as back-up reference and evidence.

Since the publication of the affidavit a plethora of new supporting documentation and
evidence has come to light. We found, for example, that on June 30, 1864, the members of
Congress acting as the Board of Directors of a private, mostly foreign-owned corporation
doing business as “The United States of America, Incorporated” changed the meaning of
“state”, “State” and “United States” to mean “District of Columbia Municipal Corporation”.
Like the 1862 change of the meaning of the word “person” to mean “corporation” cited in
our affidavit, these special coded meanings of words render a drastically different picture of
the world around us.

It turns out that your “personal bank account” is actually a “corporate bank account”. The
“Colorado State Court” is actually the “Colorado District of Columbia Municipal Corporation

If you are shocked to learn these facts, you are not alone. So are millions of other
Americans. These changes were made 150 years ago and tucked away in reams of boring
meeting minutes and legalistic gobbledygook meant to be applied only to the internal
workings of a private governmental services corporation and its employees.

There was no public announcement, just as there was no public announcement or
explanation when Congress created “municipal citizenship” known as “US citizenship” in
1868. Properly, technically, even to this day, this form of “citizenship” applies only to those
born in the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and other Insular States, so there was
no real reason to educate the general public about the topic. As Congress was secretively
using the labor and the private property assets of these “citizens” as collateral backing the
corporate debts of “The United States of America, Inc.” there was plenty of reason to
obscure this development. At the end of the Civil War it would have been very unpopular to
reveal that they were simply changing gears from private sector slave ownership to public
sector slave ownership.

You may be surprised to learn that slavery was not abolished by the Thirteenth or any other
Amendment to any constitution then or now. Instead, slavery was redefined as the
punishment meted out to criminals. Look it up and read it for yourselves. It remains
perfectly legal to enslave criminals, and it was left to Congress to define who the criminals
were, because Congress was given plenary power over the District of Columbia and its
citizenry by the original Constitution of the Republic and could do whatever it liked within
the District and the Washington, DC Municipalities.

A child picking dandelions on the sidewalk could be arbitrarily defined as a criminal and
enslaved for life by the renegade Congress functioning as the government of the District of
Columbia and as the Board of Directors for the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation,
but for starters, Congress simply defined “US citizens” as debt slaves under the 14th Amendment of their corporation’s articles and by-laws—-which they deceptively named the “Constitution of the United States of America”.

The actual Constitution was and still is called “The Constitution for the united States of
America”, but most people untrained in the Law and trusting what they believed to be their
government didn’t notice the difference between “The Constitution for the united States of
America” and the “Constitution of the United States of America”.

Are you beginning to see a pattern of deliberate deceit and self-interest and double-speak
and double-dealing? And are you also beginning to catch the drift—the motivation—behind
Let’s discuss the concept of “hypothecation of debt”. This little gem was developed by the
bankers who actually owned and ran the governmental services corporations doing business
as “The United States of America, Inc.” and as the “United States, Incorporated”.

When you hypothecate debt against someone or against some asset belonging to someone
else, you simply claim that they agreed to stand as surety for your debt — similar to co-
signing a car loan — and as long as you make your payments, nobody is any the wiser.

Normally, it’s not possible for us to just arbitrarily claim that someone is our surety for debt
without proof of consent, but that is exactly what Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the
Conference of Governors did in March of 1933. They named all of us and all our property as
surety standing good for the debts of their own bankrupt governmental services corporation
during bankruptcy reorganization—-and got away with it by claiming that they were our
“representatives” and that we had delegated our authority to them to do this “for” us.

The exact date and occasion when this happened and where it is recorded, is given in our

In order to pull this off, however, they had to allege that we were all “US citizens”, and
therefore, all subject to the plenary power of Congress acting as an oligarchy ruling over the
District of Columbia and the Federal Territories. They did this by abusing the public trust
and creating and registering millions of foreign situs trusts named after each of us. Under
their own diversity of citizenship rules, corporations are considered to be “US citizens”. So
they created all these foreign situs trusts as franchises of their own bankrupt corporation,
used our names styled like this: John Quincy Adams—-and placed commercial liens against
our names as chattel owned by their corporation and standing as surety for its debts.

A group of thugs elected to political office grossly transgressed against the American people
and the American states and committed the crime of personage against each and every one
of us without us ever being aware of it.

They couldn’t enslave us, but they could enslave a foreign situs trust named after us— that we conveniently didn’t know existed— and by deliberately confusing this “thing” with us via
the misuse of our given names, they could bring charges against what appeared to be us
and our private property in their very own corporate tribunals.

And so the fleecing of America began in earnest. The hirelings had our credit cards, had
stolen our identities, and were ready to begin a crime spree unheralded in human history.

They claimed that we all knew about this arrangement and consented to it, because we
“voluntarily” gave up our gold when FDR sent his henchmen around to collect it—-when as
millions of Americans can attest, people gave up their gold in preference to being shot or
having to kill federal agents. They chose life for everyone concerned over some pieces of
metal, and for that, they are to be honored; unfortunately, their decision gave the rats
responsible an excuse to claim that Americans wanted to leave the gold standard and
wanted the “benefits” of this New Deal in “equitable exchange” for their gold, their
identities, the abuse of their good names as bankrupts and debtors, the loss of allodial title
to their land and homes, and their subjection as slaves to the whims of Congress.

According to them—that is, those who benefited from this gross betrayal of the public
trust— we all voluntarily left the Republic and the guarantees of the actual Constitution
behind, willingly subjected ourselves to Congressional rule, donated all our assets including
our labor and property to the Public Charitable Trust (set up after the Civil War as a welfare
trust for displaced plantation slaves), and agreed to live as slaves owned by the District of
Columbia Municipal Corporation in exchange for what?

Welfare that we paid for ourselves. Social Security that we paid for ourselves.
The criminality of the “US Congress” and the “Presidents” acting since 1933 is jaw-
droppingly shocking. Their abuse of the trust of the American people is even worse.
They have portrayed this circumstance as a political choice instead of an institutionalized
fraud scheme, and they have “presumed” that we all went along with it and agreed to it
without complaint. Thus, they have been merrily and secretively having us declared “civilly
dead” as American State Citizens the day we are born, and entering a false registration
claiming that we are “US Citizens” instead.

We are told, when we wake up enough to ask, that we are free to choose our political
status. We don’t have to serve as debt slaves. We can go back and reclaim our guaranteed
Republican form of government and our birthright status if we want to—- but that requires
a secret process in front of the probate court and expatriation from the Federal United
States to the Continental United States and all sorts of voo-doo in backrooms that can only
be pursued by the few and the knowledgeable and the blessed. Everyone else has to remain
as a debt slave and chattel serving whatever corporation bought the latest version of
corporate “persona” named after us.

So let me ask you, as members of the FBI and as US Marshals—- does this sound like
something you want to be involved with enforcing on innocent people, or does it sound like
something you want to end as expeditiously as possible?

The frauds that took root in the wake of the Civil War and which blossomed in the 1930’s
have come to their final fruition. Employees of the “District of Columbia Municipal
Corporation” and its United Nations successors are being used as jack-booted thugs to
throw Americans into privately owned “federal correctional facilities” when those who need
correction—- the members of the American Bar Association and the euphemistically named
and privately owned and operated “DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE”—continue to ignore the fact
that Americans DO have a choice and that by the millions we are demanding our freedom
from all these pathetic false commercial claims and presumptions.

We are standing up before the whole world and telling these privately owned “governmental
services corporations” to go bankrupt like any other corporation that doesn’t do its job and
mind its budget. These entities deserve to go bankrupt and worse. They have spent money
and credit that was never theirs to spend. They have defrauded millions if not billions of
innocent people and they have prevented Americans from claiming their birthrights for far
too long.

These people— the members of Congress and the various “Presidents” of the numerous
“United States” corporations — have acted as criminals. They deserve to be recognized as

The members of the American Bar Association have attempted to wash their hands while
profiting from the situation and obstructing justice. They stand around shrugging and
saying, “Well, it’s a political choice. We don’t have anything to say about that.”—–yet at
the same time, they refuse to correct the probate records to reflect our chosen change of
political status when we plainly identify ourselves and enunciate our Will for them. They,
too, deserve to be recognized as self-interested criminals and accomplices to identity theft,
credit fraud, and worse— which is why we have recently issued a $279 trillion dollar
commercial obligation lien against the American Bar Association, the International Bar
Association, and the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

All our assets— our bodies, homes, businesses, lands, and labor—have been signed over
into the “Public Charitable Trust” by con men merely claiming to represent us. Then, when
we object to their lies and entrapment, they use the same fraud against us as their excuse
for bringing more false claims against us and throwing us in jail. Enough is enough.
The British Monarch and the Lords of the Admiralty have promoted this fraud against us at
the same time they have claimed to be our trustees, allies and friends in perpetuity. It’s
time to clear the way for us to politely and peaceably exit from any presumption that we are
or ever were “US citizens”, willing participants in the “Public Charitable Trust”, or willing
“sureties” for the debts of any private bank-run governmental services corporation merely
calling itself the United States of Something or Other.

We repudiate any presumption of private municipal citizenship or obligation to the District of
Columbia Municipal Corporation or any successor thereof, and demand an immediate and
permanent correction of the civil record to reflect our birthright status as American State
Citizens, nunc pro tunc.

As for you, as “Federal Agents”, you have a lot to think about. For starters— who really
pays your paycheck? Is it the goons in Washington, DC? Or does it all come from the
American people you are supposed to be serving? Do you believe for one moment that
anyone just lined up and gave their gold to FDR voluntarily? Do you believe that anyone
gave away all their property and the guarantees of the actual Constitution for the “privilege”
of paying for Social Security? No?

Wake up and smell the java and start doing your real jobs. If anyone complains—arrest
him. We are reopening the American Common Law Courts expressly for the purpose of
settling disputes related to living people and their property assets in excess of $20 as
mandated by the Seventh Amendment.

We, the American people, are the ones holding absolute civil authority upon the land of the
Continental United States, and we give you permission to arrest the members of Congress,
the President, the Secretary of the Treasury, and any other politician or appointee
pretending to speak for us so as to enslave us and bring false claims against us via this
institutionalized fraud scheme. We want it recognized for what it is and dismantled and
repudiated tout de suite.

Any court that is caught arresting and prosecuting Americans under the presumptions just
described to you— such as bringing charges against foreign situs trusts with names styled
like this: John Quincy Adams, or Cestui Que Vie trusts styled like this: JOHN QUINCY
ADAMS, or Puerto Rican public transmitting utilities styled like this: JOHN Q. ADAMS—-it is
your responsibility to make sure that any individuals being addressed by these courts were
actually born in the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, or one of the other Insular
States and that they are not ignorant American State Citizens being falsely registered and

Do you understand? Is it now completely clear who the criminals are? Your actual employers
and benefactors are being attacked and defrauded by criminals pretending to act as their
elected representatives and accomplices in black robes who are serving as enforcers of this
fraud for profit. This has been happening right under your noses.

This whole circumstance has escaped broad scale public understanding because it was being
pursued by private governmental services corporations owned and operated by international
banking cartels who claimed that these “private arrangements” were none of the public’s
business, despite the grotesque and far-ranging impact these cozy understandings have had
upon the people of this and many other countries.

Let it be perfectly clear to you that the business of these private corporations has become
our business because they have operated in violation of their charters, in violation of the
treaties allowing their existence, and in violation of the National Trust. The American Bar
Association and the Internal Revenue Service have both been owned and operated as
private foreign bill collectors and trust administrators by Northern Trust, Inc., in violent
conflict of interest. They are not professional associations, non-profits, nor units of
government. They are con artists and privateers whose licenses expired as of September 1,

The United States Marshals Service is enabled to act in the capacity of constitutionally –
sworn Federal Marshals and we invoke their office and service as such; failure to accept the
public office means rejection of all authority related to us. The same may be said of the FBI.
Either you do your jobs as constitutionally sworn public officers, or you act as private mall
cops in behalf of the offending corporations and under color of law when you pretend to
have any public authority or function.

This is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger
Alaska State Superior Court





(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyper link is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House. ~~~ Xaniel777

Mad Max The Road Warrior 1a


 ©2009 – 2015 DaniMartExtras,too


Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

REAL NEWS Sept 09 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on September 8, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : September 09, 2012


BBC Now Admits Al Qaeda Never Existed



From Alexander Higgins Blog

 Posted by  – September 7, 2012 

A BBC documentary on Al Qaeda admits the Bin Laden’s Organization never existed. Instead the US invented it out of thin air to fabricate criminal charges.




See also:

CIA Bin Laden Chief: ‘US Fighting An Enemy That Doesn’t Exist’

US Creating Enemies Through Its Foreign Policy

Former CIA Bin Laden Chief exposes the lies behind government claims that terrorists are attacking the US because they hate our freedom.

Former CIA agent Michael Scheuer, who was once in charge of hunting Bin Laden, debunks US government propaganda that “Al Qaeda” and “Islamist” terrorists are waging a war against America because they hate our freedom and they hate our way of life.

He explains how the US is fighting an enemy that does not exist.

Read Entire Article

In reality, what the western media refers to as Al Qaeda is nothing more than a Salafi Jihadists.

Salafists Islam is the version of Islam pre-dominate in Saudi Arabia and Qatar and the government of Saudi Arabia actually recruits Islamic extremists from their schools to wage Salafi Jihad against other Sunni and Shiite Muslims.

The United States doesn’t want you to know this because Saudi Arabia’s jihadists are used as a proxy mercenary army to conduct covert operations for the US Government.

For example, they were used to overthrow the Libya government and are actively working to overthrow the Syria government.

For a complete history of Saudi Arabia’s Salafi Jihadists see: Saudi Arabia Paying UK Trained Terrorists Up To $3,000/Mo To Jihad Against Syria








FBI and DHS Preparing False Flag Attack Claim Domestic Terrorists Building IEDs



From Activist Post

September 07, 2012

Susanne Posel, Contributor
Activist Post

On September 27th, in Springfield, Illinois, the Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) will conduct apresentation on improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

This demonstration is an extension of the FBI’s National Improvised Explosive Familiarization (NIEF) initiative “designed to raise awareness of the use of common chemicals to produce IEDs.”

The Illinois Fertilizer & Chemical Association (IFCA) are an organization that assists and represents “the crop production supply and service industry while promoting the sound stewardship and utilization of agricultural inputs.”

The NIEF was created in 2007.

They are “an intelligence-driven and a threat-focused national security and law enforcement organization” that becomes involved with local and state law enforcement with regard to terrorist and intelligence threats.

Just last month, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) requested 700 pounds of high density ammonium nitrate and 700 pounds of A-5 Flake RDX explosives.

These ingredients are known to be very high powered explosives.

The DHS was given oversight of procurement of ammonium nitrate after Congress requested they “regulate the sale and transfer of ammonium nitrate by an ammonium nitrate facility…to prevent the misappropriation or use of ammonium nitrate in an act of terrorism.”

The Ammonium Nitrate Security Program focuses on preventing a terrorist attack by use of ammonium nitrate in a home-made bomb by requiring that its sale and those that purchase it be registered with the DHS.

Purchasers are screened against the Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB).

Meanwhile, the DHS and FBI are warning about a possible false flag attacks using improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and “anarchists”.

Mainstream media reported that the “FBI and DHS assess with high confidence anarchist extremists will target… infrastructure in Tampa and Charlotte, with potentially significant impacts on public safety and transportation.”

Domestic terrorists, according to the DHS, are more of a threat to American safety than foreign terrorist organizations.

This harkens to the 2009 report DHS published for the Obama administration called Rightwing Extremism that stated domestic extremists, particularly white supremacists, were proposed to be the newest and most dangerous threat to the US since al-Qaeda.

While admitting that the agency had no definitive proof that “domestic rightwing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, [however] rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues.

The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.”

The FBI warned that anarchists would throw eggs and Molotov cocktails at the RNC convention and are still decrying extremists will attack the DNC in order to disrupt the proceedings.

The FBI claims that “given the historical precedence and recent arrests, we assess anarchist extremists will likely continue to exploit lawful protests to facilitate violent criminal activity at events like the upcoming political conventions.”

The DHS are also educating police departments on terrorist IED threats with the assistance of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCC).

The DHS claims that international bombings will be carried out on US soil and that the agency will develop partnerships with local and state law enforcement to prevent this from happening.

Funded by the DHS, at the University of Rhode Island, Jimmie Carol Oxley, chemist and professor, works with the DHS on projects with her students to analyze IEDs from manufacturing to various “terrorist scenarios”  that these diverse explosives could be used for.

Oxley has worked with many governmental agencies, such as the FBI, NSF, and National Academy of Sciences (NAS), National Research Council (NRC);

as well as written over 80 papers on “energetic materials (explosives, propellants, pyrotechnics). She has worked on law enforcement issues [with the FBI simulating the World Trade Center bombing (1993), with FEL examining large fertilizer bombs, and with ATF studying the behavior of pipe bombs]; however, her main research interest is hazard analysis of energetic materials.”

On a 2,200 acre site, Oxley and her students take IEDs constructed in the lab and detonate them to “see what happens.”

They use chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide to study how chemical additives can reduce or exacerbate the effects of a home-made bomb.

Most of Oxley’s students go on to work for the DHS specializing in criminal and terrorist investigations.

In May of 2012, the Global Campaign Against Improvised Explosive Devices (GCAIED) wrote a letter to Obama with the signatures of 23 members of Capitol Hill to bring “consensus” against the threat of IEDs.

With intelligence gathered by the National Counterterrorism Center’s Worldwide Incident Tracking System, there is a doubling of IEDs being manufactured annually by civilians.

The GCAIED claims that IEDs will be used to attack civilian populations with the intention to disrupt daily routines, healthcare and the November elections.

The connection to IEDs then turns toward the US veterans who may become violent and dangerous because of prolonged exposure to battlefield conditions combined with being diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Recently,Obama signed an executive order (EO) entitled, “Improving Access to Mental Health Services for Veterans, Service Members, and Military Families” wherein the Department of Defense is given control over the evaluation of the mental health of our returning service men and women by providing US government controlled “effective mental health services for veterans, service members, and their families.”

Obama demands that the VA and the DoD collaborate to provide proactive measures and a psychiatric pre-screen of returning service men and women to prevent erratic behavior.

The DoD will “review all existing mental health and substance abuse prevention, education and outreach programs” within the military services and access their effectiveness.

In the Obama administration report “Strengthening Our Military Families” written in 2011, the direction of the document points to identifying all veteran’s potential to become mentally incapacitated due to some psychiatric disorder which would cause them to become violent, depressed, aggressive and inevitably dangerous to society.

While the DHS and FBI are preparing to enact a false flag attack here in the US, the Obama administration is setting up the means to have every US veteran committed to a government-controlled mental hospital as a form of indefinite detention.

Once deemed insane, these men and women will not only have their arms taken, but their freedom restricted.

This tactic was enacted by other historical dictators from Mao in China to Hitler in Nazi-controlled Germany.

We are witnessing the Fascist takeover of our nation through the actions of the current puppet Barack Obama.

They are preparing for martial law and the complete lockdown of our country.

This first of many steps toward our decent into Totalitarianism is being played out in the demonetization of our US veterans, while simultaneously witnessing the DHS and FBI using propaganda concerning IEDs when it is the US government that is amassing 1400 pounds worth of ingredients to manufacture a fertilizer bomb.

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism.

Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.








Withdraw from WTO and Repeal NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA



From the Trenches World Report

Posted on September 7, 2012 by Admin

The Constitution of the United States of America established our nation as an independent Democratic Republic controlled by the people.

The Constitution established the laws and principles that bind us together as a free and independent nation; and

Our Constitution established that Congress, and only Congress has the power to negotiate trade with foreign countries; and,

In confirmation, Article 1, section 8 of the U.S. Constitution clearly states: “Congress shall have the Power to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes”; and

As a member of the WTO, the United States must conform to the rules and regulations of a foreign multi-lateral agency called the World Trade Organization; and

As a member of the WTO, Congress has illegally forfeited the power, (granted only to Congress by our constitution), to regulate U.S. commerce to a foreign power called the WTO.

Moreover, there is no provision in the Constitution that gives Congress the authority to pass the power to regulate, control, or govern U.S. commerce to a foreign nation, government, body, or agency like the World Trade Organization.

In addition, the President does not have the Constitutional power to negotiate trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, or the Central American Free Trade Agreement, as trade negotiation is the sole domain of the Congress of the United States according to our Constitution, Article 1, section 8.

Moreover, We the People of the United States of America believe that our Constitution is the law of the land and membership in the WTO violates Article 1, section 8 of our constitution; and is therefore unconstitutional and illegal.

Furthermore, We the People believe that NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA both undermine our economy, our security, and the sovereignty of our great nation; and

WHEREAS, U.S. trade deficits with China, Mexico, and Canada have increased significantly since the implementation of NAFTA and GATT, and that undermines our economy, sovereignty, and our independence as a nation; and

WHEREAS, NAFTA has served as a conduit for smuggling illegal aliens, illegal drugs, and terrorists into this country; and

WHEREAS, We the People, under our constitution, are against turning over our economy, our security, our independence, and our sovereignty to a foreign body; and

WHEREAS, we concede to the fact that the WTO, GATT, NAFTA, and CAFTA undermine our economy, our security, our independence, and our national sovereignty; and

WHEREAS, we believe that Americans, as a people, have the right to keep the fruits of their labor, and as a sovereign independent nation, we owe nothing to foreign countries, groups, or agencies; and

WHEREAS, we believe in upholding the Constitution of the United States of America as the supreme law of the land; and

WHEREAS, the Constitution grants Congress, and Congress alone, the authority to regulate commerce; and

WHEREAS, Congress does not have Constitutional authority to cede the control of international trade or commerce to the WTO or any other foreign government, or international body or agency; and

WHEREAS, our membership in the WTO violates Article 1, section 8, of
the Constitution of the United States of America and is therefore illegal; and

WHEREAS, the President nor Congress can not legally sign any treaty that purports to cede the authority to control U.S. commerce, trade or tariffs to a foreign body; therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED, that we the People endorse the following constitutional principles:

1. The United States government including Congress does not have the power under the Constitution of the United States of America to cede the regulation or the control of commerce to a foreign body, government, or agency.

2. Under our constitution, the United States of America does not have to answer to any governing body outside the United States for its trade regulations or trade policy.

3. Ceding authority over U.S. trade and commerce to a foreign body, government, or agency is illegal and in direct violation of Article 1, section 8, of the Constitution of the United States of America.

4. NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA exported our jobs and our properity to foreign countries and inported illegal aliens, drugs, and terrorists.

THEREFORE, We the People petition congress to honor our Constitution and their pledge to uphold and defend our Constitution by acting immediately to withdraw the United States of America from the World Trade Organization, and by repealing NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA which are all unfair and unlawful trade agreements that undetmine our economy and our sovereignty.

Sign Petition Here








The One Party Zionist System Revealed at DNC



From the Trenches World Report

Posted on September 7, 2012 by Henry Shivley

Well it would seem those still trapped in the false left paradigm have just discovered what those still trapped in the false right paradigm did last week, and that is that these two political parties are actually one and the same. 

When it comes down to brass tacks, the Israelis control our government, not the American people.

The fact is, we out here among the great unwashed and disenfranchised have discovered who the Zionists are and that the Christian Zionists in this country are in cahoots with the Zionist cabal in Israel and have been running our government for the past 50 years to the benefit of the Israelis and the detriment of the people of the US.

Make no mistake.  These Christian Zionists did not sell out cheap as they have been rewarded quite handsomely for their treason. 

The fact is their duplicity is what put them into the ranks of the elite.

You see this is why you see total agreement amongst those in both the false left and the false right on every issue concerning Israel. 

If either phony party were to waver in the slightest and cause there to be a debate, the pent up resentment against the dual citizen Israeli-Americans exercising control in our government would spew forth and the truth as to what we Americans as individuals think about being the goyim of the Zionists might very well cause an uprising.

The Jews in this country make up a mere 1.7% of our population, yet they enjoy the highest standard of living available. 

In reality this is what happened in Germany. 

All Adolf Hitler had to do was tell the German people, “Hey wake up morons, your children are starving in the streets while these Jews are living fat on your resources that they have gained control over through duplicity and manipulation.”

There is a reason that the Jews have been booted from every civilized nation around the world at one time or another throughout history. 

They are parasites that thrive on the suffering of their hosts.  Their thirst for wealth and power can never be quenched and they have never stopped as a result of their own initiative.

The Zionists literally consider all other human beings as soulless animals, there for them to use and consume for their pleasure at their leisure. 

This Zionist oppression is not going to stop until we stop it.

God bless the Republic, death to the international corporate mafia, we shall prevail.


Reality Check: DNC Runs Over Delegates With Scripted Platform Vote

Published on Sep 6, 2012 by 

Ben Swann Reality Check looks at how the DNC scripted a vote to change the party’s platform one week after the Republican leadership did the same thing at the RNC.









From our WTF? files : California passes resolution defining criticism of Israel as anti-semitism




















 From Anti-Neocons

By Tom Carter / Global Research, September 04, 2012

Last month, the California State Assembly passed a resolution urging state educational institutions to more aggressively crack down on criticism of the State of Israel on campuses, which the resolution defines as

The anti-democratic resolution is the latest step in the broader campaign to stifle and suppress dissent on California’s increasingly volatile campuses.

The California State Assembly is the lower house of the state legislature, consisting of 80 members.

The resolution—H.R. 35: “Relative to anti-Semitism”—was passed by a vote of 66 to 80, including a majority of both Republicans and Democrats in the Assembly.

The resolution was drafted by Republican Linda Halderman and passed without public discussion.

The vote on the resolution came when most students were between semesters and away from their campuses.

The resolution (available here) uses the classic trick employed by defenders of Israel’s Zionist regime: lumping together any criticism of the Israeli state’s policies or of the US government’s support for them with racist attacks on Jews.

On the one hand, the resolution denounces “swastikas and other anti-Semitic graffiti in residential halls, public areas on campus, and Hillel houses,” and denounces those who accuse “the Jewish people, or Israel, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.”

On the other hand, the bulk of the resolution is dedicated to defining criticism of the state of Israel as “anti-Semitism.”

It lists the following as examples of “anti-Semitism”:

• “language or behavior [that] demonizes and delegitimizes Israel;”

“speakers, films, and exhibits” that indicate that “Israel is guilty of heinous crimes against humanity such as ethnic cleansing and genocide;”

• describing Israel as a “racist” or “apartheid” state;

• “student-and faculty-sponsored boycott, divestment, and sanction campaigns against Israel;”

• “denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination;”

• “applying double standards by requiring of Israel a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation;” and

• “actions of student groups that encourage support for terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Hezbollah.”

This list makes clear that the accusations of anti-Semitism are a red herring, employed to attack students’ democratic rights and stifle dissent.

The resolution recalls the smear campaign against German author Günter Grass and his poem “What Must Be Said” earlier this year.

Defending the poem, the World Socialist Web Site explained: “Anti-Semitism is the term used to describe racist hatred aimed at the oppression and persecution of Jews—and in the case of the Third Reich, the extermination of Jews.

Grass’s criticisms of the war policy of the Netanyahu government are not directed against Jews, nor against Jews in Israel.

His overwhelming concern is the well-being of both the Jewish population in Israel and the Iranian people.

This is in stark contrast to the Israeli government.

“The Israeli regime does not represent the interests of the Jewish population, but rather a tiny rich and corrupt clique that has always worked closely with American imperialism.” (See Defend Günter Grass!)

The aggressive narrowness of the resolution’s definition of acceptable political discussion, combined with its broad definition of anti-Semitism, prompted the University of California to distance itself from the resolution, though without rejecting or denouncing it.

“We think it’s problematic because of First Amendment concerns,” UC spokesman Steve Montiel told the San Francisco Chronicle last week.

The resolution does clearly implicate the First Amendment, which protects not only criticism of the state of Israel, but generally protects anti-Semitic hate speech as well.

Moreover, it must also be said that the State of Israel is, as a matter of fact, guilty of crimes against humanity.

To cite only a more recent example, the 574-page UN Goldstone Report published in 2010 found that the State of Israel had deliberately targeted civilians and civilian infrastructure in Gaza during the 2008-2009 “Operation Cast Lead.”

The invasion of Gaza saw 1,400 Palestinians killed compared with 13 Israelis killed. More than 21,000 buildings, factories, and apartments were damaged or destroyed.

Under California H.R. 35, it appears that the Goldstone report is now to be considered “anti-Semitic.”

The resolution also contains a denunciation of “suppression and disruption of free speech that presents Israel’s point of view.”

This appears to be a reference to the “Irvine 11” incident last year, in which 11 students shouted down Israeli ambassador Michael Oren during his speech at the University of California at Irvine.

The 11 students shouted, “Michael Oren, you’re a war criminal,” and “You, sir, are an accomplice to genocide.”

These students were later arrested, charged, and convicted of the crimes of “conspiracy” and violating Oren’s rights. (See University of California students convicted for protesting Israeli ambassador’s speech.)

The resolution goes on to state that the “Assembly recognizes recent actions by officials of public post secondary educational institutions in California [e.g., the prosecutions of the Irvine 11] and calls upon those institutions to increase their efforts to swiftly and unequivocally condemn acts of anti-Semitism on their campuses and to utilize existing resources . . . to help guide campus discussion about, and promote, as appropriate, educational programs for combating anti-Semitism on their campuses.”

On California’s campuses, as on campuses and workplaces internationally, explosive class antagonisms are increasingly apparent.

Massive tuition hikes year after year coupled with job losses and skyrocketing youth unemployment present an entire generation of young people with an increasingly impossible situation.

State authorities in California, which is controlled by the Democratic Party, have watched the large campus protests that took place across state campuses over the past two years with hostility, consternation, and fear.

Over the past year, at the behest of Democratic Party officials, demonstrating students across the state have been attacked by paramilitary police squads armed with batons, tear gas, and flash grenades, with hundreds of students arrested and jailed.

The world’s attention was captured when students peacefully protesting tuition hikes at UC Davis were pepper sprayed by police in cold blood.

In the face of increasing tensions and protests, state authorities are moving to clamp down on the campuses, intervening to “guide campus discussion” and criminalize criticism of both domestic and foreign policy.

Under the guise of criticizing “anti-Semitism” the state government signaling that the persecution of student protesters will be tolerated or welcomed.

The resolution concludes that “strong leadership from the top remains an important priority so that no administrator, faculty, or student group can be in any doubt that anti-Semitic activity will not be tolerated in the classroom or on campus, and that no public resources will be allowed to be used for anti-Semitic or any intolerant agitation.”









Everything Is Illegal In America (Full Version)



From Underground Documentaries

In this TV special John Stossel asks, “Is everything illegal in America?”

From kids’ lemonade stands to food cooperatives to filming in public, what CAN we do in America without breaking the law? 

And when police infringe upon your rights, why are THEY never punished?










(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777


Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on REAL NEWS Sept 09 2012

REAL NEWS Aug 25, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on August 24, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : August 25, 2012




Due to lack of participation and game plan tomorrows FTX has BEEN CANCELLED!!!!!  

DO NOT GO TO the site.

Visit NEVADA at:

Sorry wrong link for MD Dog Miller’s show

This is the correct link : http://www.blogtalkradio.com/newcolony/2012/08/25/breaking-through-the-fear-with-ryan-maddog-miller

Visit WELL REGULATED AMERICAN MILITIAS ! at: http://wramsite.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network


Iraq vet arrested on terrorism charges after jogging with training rifle



 From the Trenches World Report

RT News  A US veteran is facing charges of terrorism after beingarrested for trying to get some exercise.

That’s William Alemar’s story, at least, who was detained this week after jogging in full military fatigues in public while carrying atraining rifle.

Authorities have charged 23-year-old Army National Guardsman and Iraq war veteran William Everett Alemar with “committing a terroristic act and wearing body armor while committing a felony offense.”

He was arrested on the morning of August 20 after officers responded to calls of an armed man running along a road adjacent to a Martinsburg, West Virginia high school.

When the cops found Alemar three minutes later, he was wearing his full National Guard get-up and was brandishing an air-soft “training rifle,” a gun that while similar to his actual weapon only fires pellets, not bullets.

He was also garbed in a ballistic vest composed of bullet-resistant ceramic panels and was equipped with two knives and several unloaded magazines, the Herald-Mail reports.

“The primary concern for the police department was that subject’s proximity to the areaschools — Martinsburg High School, South Middle — when he was first located off Bulldog Boulevard,” Martinsburg Police Lt. George Swartwood says to reporters.

After spotting Alemar, authorities ordered him to the ground and then seized the weapons.

He was initially held on $50,000 cash bond.

For the family of the vet, it seems a bit too much.

“He’s not a terrorist; he’s not a bad kid,” the suspect’s father, Stephen Alemar, tells The Herald-Mail.

A Facebook group, “Support William Alemar,” has been started to help the veteran as he prepares to fight his charges.

Several of the users who have joined the group have made comparisons between Alemar and Brandon Raub, a retired US Marine from Virginia man who was recently detained for one week after he posted messages on his own social networking profile that raised the eyebrows of authorities.

“The idea of a Constitution free zone is bunk, and we would like to support this American Patriot as was Brandon Raub supported in his time of trouble,” the creator of the ‘Support William Alemar’ page writes. 

“The idea you can be labeled a ‘terrorist’ simply by carrying a training rifle, ammo, and knives is once again, an overblown reaction by our government.

Unless further hitherto unknown facts are released, it seems we should unite with this American hero, who is NOT a terrorists but a citizen of the republic!”








Day After Raub’s Arrest Another Veteran Declared ‘Mentally Defective,’ and Guns Seized



From 12160.info

Posted by James Φοίνιξ on August 24, 2012

News of similar case emerges day after release of Brandon Raub

Paul Joseph Watson
Friday, August 24, 2012

Just a day after Brandon Raub was released following his incarceration in a psychiatric ward over political Facebook posts, news has emerged of a similar case involving a veteran who had his guns seized after being labeled a “mental defective’ and faces being committed by a judge.

Radio host Steve Quayle was sent news of an Army combat veteran and Purple Heart recipient in west central Ohio who was the victim of a police raid on the evening of August 22nd during which Miami County Ohio Sheriff’s deputies executed a search warrant to seize the man’s firearms for the “safety of the defendant and the general public,” according to the warrant.

The veteran, who is currently unnamed, had his guns taken because he was adjudged to be mentally incompetent, despite the fact that his previous VA psychiatric evaluations were all clear, he is not on medication, and he had no criminal record.

The man appears to be a respected member of the community – he works for a Christian company and his father is a police officer and a pastor.

“The person is under adjudication of mental incompetence, has been adjudicated as a mental defective, has been committed to a mental institution, has been found by a court to be a mentally ill person subject to hospitalization by court order, or is an involuntary patient other than one who is a patient only for purposes of observation.

As used in this division, “mentally ill person subject to hospitalization by court order” and “patient” have the same meanings as in section 5122.01 of the Revised Code,” states the warrant.

Amongst the items confiscated were a .45 caliber pistol, one .380 caliber pistol, a 12 gauge shotgun, two AR-15 rifles, a stripped AR-15 lower receiver, as well as a hunting knife.

“In addition to the confiscations, the deputies attempted to question my friend and his fiancée,” states the email sent to Quayle by the man’s friend. “I didn’t get specific details on the questions asked.

They refused to answer any questions without an attorney present. When my friend stated, “This is bullshit,” one of the deputy detectives remarked, “Look man, I’m just doing my job.”

The veteran now faces “an evaluation of mental competency” with a judge who will decide whether he should be committed to a state psychiatric ward.

If any more weapons are found on the man’s property in the interim he will have committed a felony and will face a jail sentence.

Since the veteran is active in the so-called truth movement or patriot community, it is assumed that his involvement in this field is part of the reason why he has been targeted for psychiatric evaluation.

“Unlike Brandon Raub’s case, however, the state of Ohio won’t allow law enforcement to involuntarily commit a person unless there is an immediate need to do so, such as holding a gun to their head or another person’s head,” states the email.

“Ohio law requires a judge to make the decision on having a person evaluated for mental illness.

Of course, you’re then evaluated by a state-appointed psych, and that isn’t exactly going to play out in your favor.

Had my friend lived in Virginia, he may be sitting in a metal hospital (prison) right now. Or worse.”

The veteran’s lawyer has already filed motions attempting to discover who asked the judge to sign the search warrant and for what reason he was declared mentally defective.

Earlier this year, we reported on a similar case involving David Sarti, one of the participants in the National Geographic Channel’s Doomsday Prepper show.

Sarti visited his doctor complaining of chest pains, only to have the doctor later commit him to a psychiatric ward and alert authorities, before Sarti was declared “mentally defective” and put on an FBI list that stripped him of his second amendment rights.

Brandon Raub, a former veteran of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, was also involuntarily detained for psychiatric questioning last week by authorities in Virginia’s Chesterfield County for leaving anti-establishment messages on Facebook which questioned the official story behind 9/11 and referred to corruption within the U.S. government.

Raub also posted song lyrics on a private message board.

The FBI claimed Raub’s posts were “terrorist in nature” and yet within a week Raub was ordered to be released by a judge who found that the original petition for his detention contained no facts whatsoever on the reason for his incarceration.

Raub’s lawyer John Whitehead revealed that shortly before his release, psychiatrists had threatened to forcibly medicate Raub in order to “brainwash” him.

Whitehead warned that there were 20,000 recent cases in Virginia alone of people being snatched from their homes having been declared mentally defective by the state with virtually no due process whatsoever and with the victim having committed no crime.

Critics have made comparisons to the infamous psikhushka psychiatric prisons in the former Soviet Union where dissidents were sent to be isolated, brainwashed, and have their political ideas discredited amongst the general public.

Given the fact that the Department of Homeland Security has repeatedly demonized veterans as likely domestic terrorists, it’s clear that former servicemen are being targeted as part of an effort to chill free speech and discourage other veterans from being politically active.


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.











From RonPaul2012

LAKE JACKSON, Texas – 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul will hold a major rally with thousands of supporters ahead of the Republican National Convention in Tampa.

The event will take place at noon on Sunday, August 26th at the University of South Florida’s 11,000-seat Sun Dome.  

Yesterday the Ron Paul campaign signed a contract to secure the venue with the approval of the Republican National Committee.

Details of the event are as follows.  Time is Eastern.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

12:00 p.m.
Ron Paul Major Rally
Sun Dome
University of South Florida
4202 E. Fowler Avenue
Tampa, FL 33620

A map of and directions to the Sun Dome can be found by clicking here.








 Mitt Romney nomination pushed up on concerns about storm, Ron Paul



 From the Trenches World Report

 Posted on August 24, 2012 by Admin

News Day  Republican delegates will begin the roll call vote to officially nominate Mitt Romney for president on Monday at the national convention in Tampa, which could allow Romney to accept the GOP nomination earlier in the week than has occurred at previous conventions.

The formal presidential nomination process will begin earlier than past years in part because of concerns about supporters of libertarian Texas Rep. Ron Paul, Republican officials said Thursday.

Officials are also discussing the impact that Tropical Storm Isaac could have on the convention.

Republican candidates have typically been nominated a day ahead of their convention speech.

Roll call votes have typically begun later in the convention proceedings than will occur this year, a convention official said.

Romney is slated to speak next Thursday.

Paul challenged Romney during the Republican primary process and has a following of loyal and vocal supporters, some of whom will be involved in the roll call process.

Several hundred convention delegates are pledged to support Paul.

The Texas congressman hasn’t released them to support others as former HouseSpeaker Newt Gingrich, another Romney primary rival, has allowed.

Holding much of the roll call on Monday will also allow more time for speeches during the three nights that broadcast TV networks are planning to air convention addresses and proceedings.

The three major TV networks don’t plan to cover Monday night’s convention events, leaving cable news networks to air the proceedings.

The networksplan to broadcast Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday nights during the convention.

After Romney formally accepts the party’s nomination, he’ll have access to money he’s raised to support his general election bid.

Until he’s the party’s official nominee, he’s only able to use cash he raised as contributions for his GOP primary campaign.








Absolutely Infuriating! RNC is committing FRAUD in ALL ways Stopping Ron Paul Delegates!

Changing Rules at the last minute! Took Ron Paul’s Maine delegates out.



From Sherrie Questioning All

August 24, 2012

The RNC is committing fraud they have changed all the rules at the last second stopping Ron Paul delegates!

Update 1:37 PM – RNC officially threw Maine Delegates out so Ron Paul would not have his 5 states! 

What Bullshit! 


This is so infuriating!

This shows there is no honor in any political aspect or field in regards to the government or elections!

This is proof all those at the top of the RNC have no morals nor will ever do what is right!

Yesterday I wrote that I will Never vote again! there are many comments there, including one saying “Romney has morals.”

I laughed and thought there are still so many that think they are awake, yet they are still obviously asleep. 

No one that is in the position to be elected President that has been selected by the establishment has morals!

 Understand they are all controlled!

If you vote for one of them, you are then “allowing” them to do as they will against you and the rest of the citizens of the United States! 

Remember the cheating Romney did at the Maine RNC convention?

 Here is the post about that and the video with proof of the cheating.

These are the delegates the RNC just now unseated and dissolved so Ron Paul would not have 5 states of delegates, thus his name will not be mentioned at the RNC convention now! 









Brandon Raub Released from Psychiatric Hospital; Did the FBI Go Too Far?



From the Trenches World Report

Posted on August 24, 2012 by Admin


Marine Brandon Raub of Richmond, VA, was unlawfully detained and ordered to be released from a Psychiatric Hospital,according to Circuit Judge W. Allan Sharret on Thursday.

Judge Sharret concluded that the involuntary commitment petition against Raub was “devoid of any factual allegations.”

The decision was correct; however, the shocking nature of the actions leading to Brandon’s involuntary admission to a VA hospital illustrate a broader concern about individual liberty in America.

And there are some major inconsistencies, described below.

Raub, who served his country in Iraq and Afghanistan, was taken by the FBI and Secret Service earlier this week after he was accused of posting “terroristic” messages on Facebook.

Raub’s lead attorney, John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute, said that the posts cited as “terrorist in nature” were actually a part of a private Facebook game called Illuminati that Brandon was playing online with his siblings and was being monitored by the FBI.

In January, the FBI “announced it was seeking to develop an automatic mass-monitoringcomputer application to analyze Facebook for crime-related comments,” as reported by Mashable.

Was this a part of that initiative?

 In light of this overreach, will the programbe scrapped or at the very least, reviewed?

The article claims that the FBI is also spying on SKYPE, but with a court order.

Do American Citizens want their Facebook postings and SKYPE conversions monitored by the government?

This case has been a study of conflicting statements, as the TimesDispatch reported that a “Crisis Employee” stated in a mental assessment record that one of Brandon’s friends reported Brandon to the FBI for conspiracy theories and threats to George W. Bush.

So which was it?

Did the FBI spy on Brandon or did a friend “turn him in”?

Another important conflict is that Raub’s mother said that an FBI agent told her that Brandon was “arrested by the Chesterfield police department” because he “assaulted an officer and resisted arrest.”

Michael Kelly of Business Insider, however, reported that the Chesterfield Police Department said Raub has not been charged with resisting arrest and assaulting a police officer.

This frightening inconsistency should raise flags.

Why would Brandon’s mother make such a statement if that is not what she was specifically told by the FBI?

Attorney Whitehead told Business Insider that “every year in Virginia more than 20,000 people are committed under similar circumstances and ‘that means a lot of people are disappearing’ under the pretext of mental illness.” 

If this is true, the unlawful detainment of Brandon has nothing to do with the NDAA and its unconsitutional detention provision; so that begs the question, what exactly is Virginia up to?

The Motion stated, in part:

“The government’s power to involuntarily admit an individual for evaluation of a mental illness is a creation of statute.

Because an order providing for such admission deprives a citizen of his liberty, to protect citizens from an overreaching government the Virginia legislature has created a specific, detailed procedure, set forth in Virginia Code § 37.2-800, that must be followed before an individual can be involuntarily admitted.

In the present case, that procedure was not followed.

As such, the District Court’s August 20, 2012 order is void.”

Tiffany Madison from Washington Times Communities reported that the judge overseeing the case was “shocked by the failure of the magistrate to include in the order any grounds for holding Raub.”

One cannot help but wonder how it is possible that Brandon was held in the first place.

And is Brandon Raub’s case indicative of other cases in Virginia? In America?








Does the Military Protect Our Freedom? 



From COMD – Committee Opposed to Militarism and the Draft

From Draft NOtices, March-April 2002 – Ray Wolf

“I’d like to thank our military personnel for defending our country and protecting our freedoms.”

In the wake of September 11, this is a common public acknowledgment from celebrities, politicians, myriad TV and radio commentaries, and many people on the streets of the United States.

As a Navy veteran, whenever I hear statements like these, I think, “What are they talking about? Since when does the military have anything to do with freedom?”

If I make this statement out loud, I’m often told that the military protects my right to criticize the U.S. government and the military.

I use such circumstances as an opportunity to educate people who believe that the military protects our freedoms.

Here is one blueprint I’ve used successfully in conversations with friends, family and even strangers to shift the conversation.

History is a powerful place to begin, and many people know little about how the U.S. government has repeatedly used its military against its own citizens.

In 1877, for example, railroad workers went on strike to protest pay cuts, profiteering by the railroads, and unsafe working conditions that led to injury, dismemberment, and death.

The U.S. Army was deployed to crush the union strikers. Collusion played a major role, since the railroads loaned the U.S. government the money to pay the Army officers (but not the enlisted men).

What this means is that the Army was protecting the railroad barons’ right to harm and exploit their workers.

For those who might protest that this was a long time ago, it’s important to point out that these early actions set the precedents for continued use of the military against U.S. citizens, and then proceed with the history lesson.

In the summer of 1932, the worst year of the Depression, 25,000 penniless WWI veterans and their families camped out in shacks and abandoned buildings in Washington, D.C., to ask Congress for their veterans’ bonus to feed their starving children.

Eventually, President Hoover ordered the U.S. Army to attack and disperse them.

After charging the ragged group of men, women, and children with tanks, tear gas, and bayonets, the Army leveled and torched the camp. There were more than 100 casualties, including two babies.

This assault against U.S. citizens was led by General Douglas MacArthur, who was aided by future general George Patton and future general and president Dwight Eisenhower.

The military violently denied the rights of U.S. citizens to exercise free speech and petition the government — it was not protecting those rights.

It can be useful to ask people who believe that the military protects our freedoms why it was necessary, as late as the 1960s, to have a movement seeking to secure constitutional rights for people of color.

It was civilians at that time who, at great sacrifice, struggled to bring about a change.

In fact, it has almost always been civilians, through grassroots movements, who have fought for our rights and freedoms in this country, while the military has supported the system that,

among other things, profited from slavery, practiced genocide against native people, denied the female half of the population their right to vote, and prevented people of color from civil rights protection.

Another infamous use of the military in that era was at Kent State University.

Four college students who were protesting the Viet Nam War and the government’s illegal bombing of Cambodia were murdered by National Guardsmen.

Could one say that the military was protecting the U.S. government’s right to wage war by shooting its own citizens?

If that’s still not current enough, you can ask about Esequiel.

“Essay what?” is the usual response I get.

In 1997 Esequiel Hernandez, Jr., a U.S. citizen, was murdered by U.S. Marines patrolling the border with Mexico while he was herding sheep in Texas.

An investigation revealed not only that the Marines’ claim that Esequiel was shooting at them was bogus, but that he probably didn’t even know they were in the area.

The Marines certainly weren’t protecting Esequiel’s right to life.

At any point in the discussion military supporters are likely to challenge my points.

Here are a few examples:

  • The military has been around for over two hundred years. 

    You’re just pointing out a few instances where it has acted improperly. 

    Actually, these are only a few examples, and there are dozens, if not hundreds, of other cases.

     One of the reasons that some early government leaders wanted a strong central government was to have enough military power to respond to uprisings among the citizens, 

    and the government has regularly used the military for such control throughout the entire history of the U.S.

  • The military is just following orders from politicians.

     A variation is: Politicians are the ones that are really responsible.

     It’s true that politicians are often the people who give the military the authority to commit reprehensible acts.

     This gives me an opportunity to talk about the “military-industrial complex” — the term used to describe the relationships among the military, politicians, weapons manufacturers, and other transnational corporate interests (particularly oil corporations)

    In this system the Pentagon, military contractors, and other corporations all use enormous political pressure and financial incentives to influence politicians to act in their best interests. 

    Another feature of the system is that high-ranking military personnel make decisions that are profitable for weapons manufacturers, 

    and when their military careers are over, 

    many of these former Pentagon decision-makers take well-paying positions with military contractors as executives, lobbyists, 

    or consultants, and some go into politics. 

    The corporations need wars — declared or undeclared — to keep making the money that benefits the insiders in this system.

It’s hard for most people to realize that they’ve been lied to, so it helps to provide examples showing that the military not only doesn’t protect our rights, it actually restricts them.

In the 1980s, peace and anti-militarism groups seeking to counter military recruiters had to go to court in several cities after being denied the same access to public high schools that was granted to the military.

In San Diego and Atlanta the cases went to federal appellate courts, where it was argued that under the Constitution, equal access must be given to both sides once a forum on a controversial political issue has been created by public school officials.

The U.S. military moved to intervene in both of these cases so it could use its vast legal and financial resources to influence the decisions.

The Pentagon succeeded in intervening in the Atlanta case, which was still decided in favor of the counter-recruitment group but with very narrow parameters set for equal access.

In the San Diego case, the Pentagon’s motion to intervene was rejected on a technicality, allowing a court ruling to stand that granted the broadest access rights to counter-recruiters.

This outcome did not erase the fact that the military acted to limit, not guarantee, free speech.

Another example of the military deterring free speech rights occurred when the U.S. Marines banned the Project on Youth and Non-Military Opportunities from participating in the 1998 San Diego Youth Summit held at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar.

Against the wishes of the civilians who organized the event, the Marine Corps refused to allow a group that promoted peace and social change to express its views.

Yet another example of military anti-democratic assault on the rights of U.S. citizens occurred last year.

For decades the residents of Vieques, Puerto Rico, have been trying to get the Navy to cease bombing exercises, clean up its toxic waste, and leave the island (see Draft NOtices, July-August 2000).

Following intense pressure from the people of Vieques and their supporters, President Clinton issued a directive that a referendum would be held to allow the people of Vieques to vote on whether the Navy should stay or leave.

Unfortunately, Clinton allowed the Navy to determine when the referendum would be held.

(Who’s in charge here? Certainly not the people.)

The Navy scheduled the referendum for November 5, 2001, and public sentiment clearly showed that the Navy would have been voted out. Not surprisingly, the Navy decided to postpone the referendum, clearly suppressing civilian rights.

If you’ve made it this far in a discussion with a military supporter, you can point out that in all of these examples, what the military was really protecting was wealthy people in privileged positions and their opportunity to expand their power

and/or profiteer from war without the inconvenience of dissenting voices and Constitutional restrictions.

Sometimes this is enough for your discussion partner to acknowledge that they’re all a bunch of jerks, but the country still needs to be protected. If you’re invited to answer the question,

“Well, what would you do?” you’ve got an invaluable opportunity for education and social change. Use it!

Suggested resources for more information:

 A People’s History of the United States, Howard Zinn; 

Deterring Democracy, Noam Chomsky;

Derailing Democracy, David McGowan;

Free Speech TV, Ch. 9415 on Dish Network Satellite, www.freespeech.org;

Democracy Now! on selected radio stations around the country and on the Web at www.democracynow.org.

This article is from Draft NOtices, the newsletter of the Committee Opposed to Militarism and the Draft (www.comdsd.org).








(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777


Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on REAL NEWS Aug 25, 2012

REAL NEWS Aug 15, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on August 14, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : August 15, 2012


Richard Gilbert Takes On Romney’s Felony Crime Of Foreign Contributions


 {XANIEL’S NOTE : You really need to hear the whole video to truly appreciate it ! }~~~Xaniel777


From 12160.info

Added by 7R33SandR0P3S on August 14, 2012


Published on Aug 13, 2012 by 

Top Comments :

  • Very good, Mr. Gilbert. Will you be submitting felony complaints with the Hillsborough County Sheriffs Office? The Hillsborough Country Sheriff would then be compelled to arrest and incarcerate Mitt Romney and could arrest Mitt Romney’s security staff, including Secret Service agents, for obstruction of justice, should they resist.



  • Respect the message, ignore the hair 🙂



see all

All Comments (14)








Getting Prepared Month 11: Stock Up on Disposables & Build a Neighborhood Contact List


From Activist Post

Gaye Levy, Contributor
Activist Post – August 14, 2012

In North America, we are enjoying the final months of summer.

This is a time for family activities, picnics, BBQs with friends and perhaps a weekend camping trip.

There is also the usual rash of summer chores: mowing the lawn, washing the car, weeding the garden and the more mundane tasks of laundry and housecleaning.

I don’t know about you, but I would much rather be enjoying the fun in the sun than serious prepping this month.

For that reason, this month we are going to do things that are a natural outtake from our summer activities.

That said, we are not going to slough off and disregard the tasks at hand as frivolous.

For even though they seem rather menial, they are as important and as necessary as the prepping tasks in each of the previous months – and in some ways even more.

And for those of you that are just joining us? Last September, I laid out a calendar of preparedness tasks entitled 12 Months of Prepping, One Month at a Time.

Each month since then, I have outlined a reasonable and doable number of tasks to accomplish during the monthly period with the intent of gradually building up to a point of self-reliance in the event of a major disaster or crisis.

Even though we are now at month 11, you can still use this month as a starting point or, if you prefer, you can go back to the beginning and start with the first month in the series Getting Prepared Month 1: Supplies, Gear and Tasks to Get You Started.

Whatever you decide, I hope you will follow along and do what you can be prepared.

Are you ready to get started?

Let’s go to work on getting prepared in month #11.


  • Package of paper plates

  • Package of napkins

  • Package of eating utensils

  • Package of paper cups

  • Garbage bags and ties for disposal of used items

As much as I hate to use disposables, there is a strong likelihood that water for cleaning will become quite precious following a disaster.

Even if you normally shun paper goods, it is prudent – in fact necessary – to put aside a supply of paper plates, napkins, cups an plastic eating utensils for emergency purposes.

And what better time to do so than during the summer months when these items are likely to be on sale?

You are also going to want to purchase a supply of garbage bags so that you have someplace to store the garbage and the used and dirtied items until things get back to normal.

Personally, I prefer tall, kitchen type bags but others may prefer the large, garbage can sized bags.

Whatever you decide, be sure to take the time now to look around your home and property and to identify a location where you can store excess garbage if normal collection methods are shut down for awhile.

These are the basics.

And although we have covered these items in the past, double check that you do indeed have a manual can opener, a sharp, all purpose knife and some paper towels as well.

But there is more.

For extra credit, think about what you would need if you had to cook outdoors.

Perhaps a rocket stove or grill that burns wood or biomass?

How about some waterproof matches or a zippo lighter?

We will get in to these in greater detail down the road, but if you have the budget, think about these things now, and perhaps add them to your month 11 purchases.

Shall we move on to tasks?


Exchange work, home and emergency contact phone numbers and email addresses with neighbors for use during an emergency

Neighbors helping neighbors is an important part emergency and disaster preparedness.

This is not to say that you are going to have to provide for your neighbors – after all, they need to provide for their own basics such a food, water and first aid supplies.

On the other hand, when something bad happens – you will want to get in touch with your neighbors and of course, you would want them to get in touch with you as well.

Think about this: You are at work and you receive a news alert indicating that there is a fire in what appears to be your neighborhood.

Who do you call?

Is it your house?

Is it the house next door?

What about your pets?

Are they safe?

Although this is a simplistic (yet still dreadful) example, having neighbors that are able to contact you directly or that can pass your contact information on to first responders will go a long way toward keeping panic and fear at bay.

Your only task this month is to contact your neighbors so that you can exchange emergency contact information for use in an emergency.

Telephone numbers, cell phone numbers and email addresses should be gathered and stored in a safe place in both printed and electronic format on a hard disk, smart phone (if you have one) or flash drive.

Now I know that these days, with OPSEC and all, the idea of neighbors helping neighbors is becoming unpopular.

I challenge you, though, this month, to look at this from the standpoint of YOU being the one in need.

Wouldn’t you want someone to contact you?

The Final Word

Although the purchases and tasks this month seem like no-brainers, they are critical to putting together a complete preparedness plan for you and your loved ones.

Disasters can and do happen to ordinary folks.

They happen to anyone and everyone, rich or poor, young or old.

The best we can do is take steps now to prepared for the unexpected.

Remember: You are responsible for your own preparedness.

No one else will do it for you.

Read other articles by Gaye Levy here.

In case you missed any of the articles in this series :

Month 1: Supplies, Gear and Tasks to Get You Started

Month 2: First Aid, Personal Hygiene and Home Safety

Month 3: Special Foods, Fire Drills and Home Safety

Month 4: Prescription Medicine, Cash, and Things to Keep Us Warm

Month 5: Sanitation Supplies and Establishing a Community of Like-Minded Folks

Month 6: Fitness, Energy Bars and Face Masks

Month 7: Gear, Tools, and Skills to Save Lives

Month 8: Adding Supplies, Tasks, and an Emergency Preparedness Kit for Your Vehicle

Month 9: Duct Tape and Drills

Month 10: Practice Going Off Grid

Enjoy your next adventure through common sense and thoughtful preparation!

You can support this information by voting for it on Reddit HERE

Gaye Levy, the SurvivalWoman, grew up and attended school in the Greater Seattle area.

After spending many years as an executive in the software industry, she started a specialized accounting practice offering contract CFO work to emerging high tech and service industries.

She has now abandoned city life and moved to a serenely beautiful rural area on an island in NW Washington State.

She lives and teaches the principles of a sustainable, self-reliant and stylish lifestyle through emergency preparation and disaster planning through her website at BackdoorSurvival.com.

SurvivalWoman speaks her mind and delivers her message with optimism and grace, regardless of mayhem swirling around us.  Enjoy your next adventure through common sense and thoughtful preparation! 








Letter From Satan: Dear Brother Corzine


From The Daily Bail

August 14, 2012

Dear Brother Corzine:

Here’s an early Christmas present even though I find that holiday so loathsome, as you know.  It’s a federal court of appeals decision that came out last week.

I trust you’ll find it as comforting as I do.



“Instead of maintaining customer assets in segregated accounts as required by law, Sentinel had pledged hundreds of millions of dollars in customer assets to secure an overnight loan at the Bank of New York, now Bank of New York Mellon.

This left the bank in a secured position on Sentinel’s $312 million loan but its customers out millions.

After filing for bankruptcy, Sentinel’s liquidation trustee brought a variety of claims against the bank to dislodge its secured position.

After extensive proceedings, including more than two weeks of trial over the course of more than a month, the district court rejected the claims.

This appeal raises concerns about Sentinel’s business practices and the degree to which the bank knew about them, but based on the district court’s factual findings, we affirm.”

Yours in Untrammeled Malevolence,



UPDATE – Satan Clarifies His Letter

To be clear about my minions’ fine work in punishing innocent account holders by rewarding evildoers with the contents of those accounts: the court freely acknowledges, in the 1st sentence of the opinion, that Sentinel’s transfer of those accounts–to the Honorable Jon Corzine’s colleagues at Bank of New York Mellon (“Bank”)–was illegal.

Clinging to the notion that the rule of law has any place in my Kingdom of Evil, the account holders tried to prove they were entitled to their own money, even after it was stolen, under a theory of “equitable subordination,” under which Bank’s claim to the purloined funds would have been subordinated to those naive account holders.

Too succeed under the dead letter of law, the account holders had to prove that the Bank acted inequitably, that is, with conduct that was egregious.

As a humorous demonstration of my raw dark power, I dispatched to court several officials of the Bank–all pathological liars–whose own email correspondence demonstrates to a certainty that they knew that the $300 million transferred could not possibly have belonged to Sentinel, but must instead have belonged to the fools banking there.

Predictably, the Bank officials perjured themselves repeatedly at trial.

It is on the following basis that I will appoint all three appellate court panel members to an Executive Suite in Hell.

 What follows is a perversion of justice so remarkably devious that I’m inclined to strike the judicial triumvirate dead this instant so that we may enjoy cocktails together before dining on slaughtered puppies this evening:

“Instead of finding that their testimony justified a finding of egregious bank behavior, the district court essentially found that the bank officials were such artless liars that they couldn’t have been concealing deliberate wrongdoing.  

Instead, the bank officials were simply trying to cover up their own incompetence.”


Keep on Rocking in the Free World, HAHAHA….


The Devil Himself


P.S. – This court ruling is not good news for those who want to see you in prison…

Corzine congressional testimony:

Dec. 08 2011 – In testimony to congress, former MF Global CEO Jon Corzine apologized but said he did not know what happened to the missing customer funds.

Editor’s Note – It’s $1.6 trillion, not $1.2 trillion.

And Corzine is lying.  Read the following links.


COURTS GIVE WALL STREET LICENSE TO STEAL – “Ann Barnhardt – A Matter of Record”








 Ex-CIA Analyst Tells Us The Real Reason Israel Wants To Strike Iran Before The US Election




August 14, 2012 –  by Michael Kelley

Ehud barak

For months senior Israeli officials have said the “window of opportunity” for attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities is before the U.S. presidential election in November because Iran’s nuclear facilities will soon be in fortified underground bunkers out of the reach of Israeli bombs. 

But former CIA analyst Ray McGovern believes that delaying Iran’s nuclear capabilities is not the primary concern of a military strike, but simply the pretext.

“The Israelis want to pretend the Iranians are building up their nuclear capabilities, want to zap them between now and November 6, and the chances are at least even that they will try to do that thinking the U.S. will come in with both feet,” McGovern told us.

McGovern thinks that “Israel does not fear a nuclear weapon in Iran’s hands” because Israel already has a nuclear arsenal and the threat of Iran having a couple of nukes “would not be all that credible except in a limited, deterrent way.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak

That deterrent would be important, however, because “since 1967 the Israelis have been able to pretty much do whatever they want in that area” and a nuclear Iran would bring a different strategic situation because, for the first time, Israel would have to look over their shoulder.”

So even though Israel’s leaders don’t truly fear imminent nuclear annihilation, McGovern says they “would like to end any possibility, however remote, that anytime soon Iran could have that kind of very minimal deterrent capability.”

McGovern believes that Israel’s primary goal is to have Iran bloodied the same way we did to Iraq so that Iran “would no longer be able to support Hamas and Hezbollah in Gaza, Lebanon, and elsewhere.”

And the reason Nov. 6 is an important date, McGovern wrote in a recent article, is that “a second-term Obama would feel much freer not to commit U.S. forces on Israel’s side” and “might use U.S. leverage to force Israeli concessions on thorny issues relating to Palestine.”

There is serious doubt that Israel could handle a full-fledged war with Iran, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has admitted that he would prefer the U.S. and its superior firepower lead any attack

A potential loss of leverage after Nov. 6 would explain the current drumbeat of war being played by Netanyahu and Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak.

BI contributor ForexCrunch points out that Netanyahu was recently granted greater powers within the government, a text message system is being tested in case of retaliation to an attack, the Bank of Israel is preparing the financial system for an Israeli strike in Iran, France is preparing to evacuate its citizens from Israel, and the Israeli media have published a flurry of articles suggesting a military strike is imminent

“Netanyahu feels, with good reason, that he’s got Obama in a corner for these next three months,” McGovern said. “If he’s right about Obama jumping in with both feet—and I think Obama would do that—even though Israeli generals are advising that it could be a disaster, [then] Netanyahu is willing to try it.”

For its part the Obama administration has been doing everything it can—short of saying that it would not back an Israeli strike—to delay an attack. Beyond offering firepower in exchange for waiting until after the election, U.S. officials informed Israel that staunch American ally Saudi Arabia vowed to take down any Israeli jet flying in its airspace.

And five senior officials—including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta—have visited Israel this month to insist there is still time for diplomacy, in the form of talks and heavy sanctions, to prevent a physical attack.

But, as McGovern notes, it may not be up to the U.S. at this point.

“We are at war with Iran right now—not only the cyber attacks, but the special forces inside Iran and the assassination of the Iranian scientists,” McGovern said. “The only question is whether that will extend to an attempt to destroy their nuclear-development facilities, and that’s up to Israel.”








  FBI raiding homes of Occupy activists




by Jacque Fresco – August 14, 2012

FBI raid wall street protestors

A US newspaper has revealed that the FBI has been raiding the houses of anti-Wall Street protesters in Oregon and Washington in what the agency describes an “ongoing violent crime investigation.”

The Oregonian newspaper reported that heavily-armed domestic terrorism units of the FBI have been raiding the homes of activists in Seattle and Olympia, Washington and Portland, Oregon over the last month.

The report said that at least six homes have been raided in the two states since July 10.

The FBI has described the raids as part of an ongoing violent crime investigation, linked to last year’s Occupy May Day protests, during which a number of minor acts of vandalism allegedly took place.

In one of the raids, eyewitnesses reported as many as 80 agents in body armor, wearing military fatigues, and armed with assault rifles participated in the raid.

“I just heard lots of pounding at 6 o’clock, and I got up and I saw the whole thing,” said one of the eyewitnesses, adding, “I saw them screaming to get in. They were using the battering ram, and then finally the door just opened.”

FBI spokeswoman Beth Anne Steele told the newspaper, “The warrants are sealed… and I anticipate they will remain sealed.”

The paper said the agents were searching for “anti-government or anarchist literature or material” and “documentation and communications related to the offenses, including but not limited to notes, diagrams, letters, diary and journal entries, address books, and other documentation in written or electronic form.”

The Occupy Wall Street movement began when a group of demonstrators gathered in New York’s financial district on September 17, 2011 to protest against corruption, the unjust distribution of wealth in the country, and the excessive influence of big corporations on US policies.

Wall street protesters vs bankers

Source: PressTV








Disinformation: How It Works


From Information Clearing House

By Brandon Smith – August 13, 2012  

— There was a time, not too long ago (relatively speaking), that governments and the groups of elites that controlled them did not find it necessary to conscript themselves into wars of disinformation.

Propaganda was relatively straightforward.

The lies were much simpler.

The control of information flow was easily directed.

Rules were enforced with the threat of property confiscation and execution for anyone who strayed from the rigid socio-political structure.

Those who had theological, metaphysical or scientific information outside of the conventional and scripted collective world view were tortured and slaughtered.

The elites kept the information to themselves, and removed its remnants from mainstream recognition, sometimes for centuries before it was rediscovered.

With the advent of anti-feudalism, and most importantly the success of the American Revolution, elitists were no longer able to dominate information with the edge of a blade or the barrel of a gun.

The establishment of Republics, with their philosophy of open government and rule by the people, compelled Aristocratic minorities to plot more subtle ways of obstructing the truth and thus maintaining their hold over the world without exposing themselves to retribution from the masses.

Thus, the complex art of disinformation was born.

The technique, the “magic” of the lie, was refined and perfected.

The mechanics of the human mind and the human soul became an endless obsession for the establishment.

The goal was malicious, but socially radical; instead of expending the impossible energy needed to dictate the very form and existence of the truth, they would allow it to drift, obscured in a fog of contrived data.

They would wrap the truth in a Gordian Knot of misdirection and fabrication so elaborate that they felt certain the majority of people would surrender, giving up long before they ever finished unraveling the deceit.

The goal was not to destroy the truth, but to hide it in plain sight.

In modern times, and with carefully engineered methods, this goal has for the most part been accomplished.

However, these methods also have inherent weaknesses.

Lies are fragile.

They require constant attentiveness to keep them alive.

The exposure of a single truth can rip through an ocean of lies, evaporating it instantly.

In this article, we will examine the methods used to fertilize and promote the growth of disinformation, as well as how to identify the roots of disinformation and effectively cut them, starving out the entire system of fallacies once and for all.

Media Disinformation Methods

The mainstream media, once tasked with the job of investigating government corruption and keeping elitists in line, has now become nothing more than a public relations firm for corrupt officials and their Globalist handlers.

The days of the legitimate “investigative reporter” are long gone (if they ever existed at all), and journalism itself has deteriorated into a rancid pool of so called “TV Editorialists” who treat their own baseless opinions as supported fact.

The elitist co-opting of news has been going on in one form or another since the invention of the printing press.

However, the first methods of media disinformation truly came to fruition under the supervision of newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst, who believed the truth was “subjective” and open to his personal interpretation.

Some of the main tactics used by the mainstream media to mislead the masses are as follows:

Lie Big, Retract Quietly: Mainstream media sources (especially newspapers) are notorious for reporting flagrantly dishonest and unsupported news stories on the front page, then quietly retracting those stories on the very back page when they are caught. In this case, the point is to railroad the lie into the collective consciousness.

Once the lie is finally exposed, it is already too late, and a large portion of the population will not notice or care when the truth comes out.

Unconfirmed Or Controlled Sources As Fact: Cable news venues often cite information from “unnamed” sources, government sources that have an obvious bias or agenda, or “expert” sources without providing an alternative “expert” view.

The information provided by these sources is usually backed by nothing more than blind faith.

Calculated Omission: Otherwise known as “cherry picking” data. One simple piece of information or root item of truth can derail an entire disinfo news story, so instead of trying to gloss over it, they simply pretend as if it doesn’t exist.

When the fact is omitted, the lie can appear entirely rational.

This tactic is also used extensively when disinformation agents and crooked journalists engage in open debate.

Distraction, And The Manufacture Of Relevance: Sometimes the truth wells up into the public awareness regardless of what the media does to bury it.

When this occurs their only recourse is to attempt to change the public’s focus and thereby distract them from the truth they were so close to grasping.

The media accomplishes this by “over-reporting” on a subject that has nothing to do with the more important issues at hand.

Ironically, the media can take an unimportant story, and by reporting on it ad nauseum, cause many Americans to assume that because the media won’t shut-up about it, it must be important!

Dishonest Debate Tactics: Sometimes, men who actually are concerned with the average American’s pursuit of honesty and legitimate fact-driven information break through and appear on T.V.

However, rarely are they allowed to share their views or insights without having to fight through a wall of carefully crafted deceit and propaganda.

Because the media know they will lose credibility if they do not allow guests with opposing viewpoints every once in a while, they set up and choreograph specialized T.V. debates in highly restrictive environments which put the guest on the defensive, and make it difficult for them to clearly convey their ideas or facts.

TV pundits are often trained in what are commonly called “Alinsky Tactics.”

Saul Alinsky was a moral relativist, and champion of the lie as a tool for the “greater good”; essentially, a modern day Machiavelli.

His “Rules for Radicals” were supposedly meant for grassroots activists who opposed the establishment and emphasized the use of any means necessary to defeat one’s political opposition.

But is it truly possible to defeat an establishment built on lies, by use of even more elaborate lies, and by sacrificing one’s ethics?

In reality, his strategies are the perfect format for corrupt institutions and governments to dissuade dissent from the masses.

Today, Alinsky’s rules are used more often by the establishment than by its opposition.

Alinsky’s Strategy: Win At Any Cost, Even If You Have To Lie

Alinsky’s tactics have been adopted by governments and disinformation specialists across the world, but they are most visible in TV debate.

While Alinsky sermonized about the need for confrontation in society, his debate tactics are actually designed to circumvent real and honest confrontation of opposing ideas with slippery tricks and diversions.

Alinsky’s tactics, and their modern usage, can be summarized as follows:

1) Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.

We see this tactic in many forms.

For example, projecting your own movement as mainstream, and your opponent’s as fringe.

Convincing your opponent that his fight is a futile one.

Your opposition may act differently, or even hesitate to act at all, based on their perception of your power.

How often have we heard this line: “The government has predator drones.There is nothing the people can do now…”  

This is a projection of exaggerated invincibility designed to elicit apathy from the masses.

2) Never go outside the experience of your people, and whenever possible, go outside of the experience of the enemy.

Don’t get drawn into a debate about a subject you do not know as well as or better than your opposition.

If possible, draw them into such a situation instead. Go off on tangents.

Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty in your opposition.

This is commonly used against unwitting interviewees on cable news shows whose positions are set up to be skewered.

The target is blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.

In television and radio, this also serves to waste broadcast time to prevent the target from expressing his own position.

3) Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.

The objective is to target the opponent’s credibility and reputation by accusations of hypocrisy.

If the tactician can catch his opponent in even the smallest misstep, it creates an opening for further attacks, and distracts away from the broader moral question.

4) Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.

“Ron Paul is a crackpot.”

“Gold bugs are crazy.”

“ Constitutionalists are fringe extremists.”

Baseless ridicule is almost impossible to counter because it is meant to be irrational.

It infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

It also works as a pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

5) A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.

The popularization of the term “Teabaggers” is a classic example; it caught on by itself because people seem to think it’s clever, and enjoy saying it.

Keeping your talking points simple and fun helps your side stay motivated, and helps your tactics spread autonomously, without instruction or encouragement.

6) A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.

See rule No. 5. Don’t become old news.

If you keep your tactics fresh, it’s easier to keep your people active.

Not all disinformation agents are paid. The “useful idiots” have to be motivated by other means.

Mainstream disinformation often changes gear from one method to the next and then back again.

7) Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.

Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance.

As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.

Never give the target a chance to rest, regroup, recover or re-strategize.

Take advantage of current events and twist their implications to support your position.

Never let a good crisis go to waste.

8) The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself

This goes hand in hand with Rule No. 1.

Perception is reality.

Allow your opposition to expend all of its energy in expectation of an insurmountable scenario.

The dire possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.

9) The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.

The objective of this pressure is to force the opposition to react and make the mistakes that are necessary for the ultimate success of the campaign.

10) If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.

As grassroots activism tools, Alinsky tactics have historically been used (for example, by labor movements or covert operations specialists) to force the opposition to react with violence against activists, which leads to popular sympathy for the activists’ cause.

Today, false (or co-opted) grassroots movements and revolutions use this technique in debate as well as in planned street actions and rebellions (look at Syria for a recent example).

11) The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.

Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.

Today, this is often used offensively against legitimate activists, such as the opponents of the Federal Reserve.

Complain that your opponent is merely “pointing out the problems.”

Demand that they offer not just “a solution”, but THE solution.

Obviously, no one person has “the” solution.

When he fails to produce the miracle you requested, dismiss his entire argument and all the facts he has presented as pointless.

12) Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it.

Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy.

The target’s supporters will expose themselves. Go after individual people, not organizations or institutions.

People hurt faster than institutions.

The next time you view an MSM debate, watch the pundits carefully, you will likely see many if not all of the strategies above used on some unsuspecting individual attempting to tell the truth.

Internet Disinformation Methods

Internet trolls, also known as “paid posters” or “paid bloggers,” are increasingly and openly being employed by private corporations as well governments, often for marketing purposes and for “public relations” (Obama is notorious for this practice).

Internet “trolling” is indeed a fast growing industry.

Trolls use a wide variety of strategies, some of which are unique to the internet, here are just a few:

1. Make outrageous comments designed to distract or frustrate: An Alinsky tactic used to make people emotional, although less effective because of the impersonal nature of the Web.

2. Pose as a supporter of the truth, then make comments that discredit the movement: We have seen this even on our own forums — trolls pose as supporters of the Liberty Movement, then post long, incoherent diatribes so as to appear either racist or insane.

The key to this tactic is to make references to common Liberty Movement arguments while at the same time babbling nonsense, so as to make those otherwise valid arguments seem ludicrous by association.

In extreme cases, these “Trojan Horse Trolls” have been known to make posts which incite violence — a technique obviously intended to solidify the false assertions of the think tank propagandists like the SPLC, which purports that Constitutionalists should be feared as potential domestic terrorists.

3. Dominate Discussions: Trolls often interject themselves into productive Web discussions in order to throw them off course and frustrate the people involved.

4. Prewritten Responses: Many trolls are supplied with a list or database with pre-planned talking points designed as generalized and deceptive responses to honest arguments.

When they post, their words feel strangely plastic and well rehearsed.

5. False Association: This works hand in hand with item No. 2, by invoking the stereotypes established by the “Trojan Horse Troll.”

For example: calling those against the Federal Reserve “conspiracy theorists” or “lunatics”; deliberately associating anti-globalist movements with racists and homegrown terrorists, because of the inherent negative connotations; and using false associations to provoke biases and dissuade people from examining the evidence objectively.

6. False Moderation: Pretending to be the “voice of reason” in an argument with obvious and defined sides in an attempt to move people away from what is clearly true into a “grey area” where the truth becomes “relative.”

7. Straw Man Arguments: A very common technique.

The troll will accuse his opposition of subscribing to a certain point of view, even if he does not, and then attacks that point of view.

Or, the troll will put words in the mouth of his opposition, and then rebut those specific words.

Sometimes, these strategies are used by average people with serious personality issues.

However, if you see someone using these tactics often, or using many of them at the same time, you may be dealing with a paid internet troll.

Stopping Disinformation

The best way to disarm disinformation agents is to know their methods inside and out.

This gives us the ability to point out exactly what they are doing in detail the moment they try to do it.

Immediately exposing a disinformation tactic as it is being used is highly destructive to the person utilizing it.

It makes them look foolish, dishonest and weak for even making the attempt.

Internet trolls most especially do not know how to handle their methods being deconstructed right in front of their eyes and usually fold and run from debate when it occurs.

The truth is precious.

It is sad that there are so many in our society who have lost respect for it; people who have traded in their conscience and their soul for temporary financial comfort while sacrificing the stability and balance of the rest of the country in the process.

The human psyche breathes on the air of truth.

Without it, humanity cannot survive.

Without it, the species will collapse, starving from lack of intellectual and emotional sustenance.

Disinformation does not only threaten our insight into the workings of our world; it makes us vulnerable to fear, misunderstanding, and doubt: all things that lead to destruction.

It can drive good people to commit terrible atrocities against others, or even against themselves.

Without a concerted and organized effort to defuse mass-produced lies, the future will look bleak indeed.

You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com

This article was originally published at Alt-Market








(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777


Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on REAL NEWS Aug 15, 2012

%d bloggers like this: