DaniMartExtras, Too

ALTERNATIVE NEWS NETWORK

Posts Tagged ‘Second Amendment’

REAL NEWS Oct. 04 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on October 3, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : October 04, 2012

” WAKING UP THE WORLD ONE DAY AT A TIME ! “

=================================================================================================

Now a Fact : Americans Can Be Indefinitely Detained: #NDAA Supported By Court

=================================================================

{XANIEL’S NOTE : This would be the end of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights

which equally means the end of The United States of America !! }~~~Xaniel777

=================================================================

Americans can be indefinitely detained - NDAA supported by court

From Alexander Higgins Blog

Posted by  – October 3, 2012

On Tuesday, a federal appeals court ruled that the US government can indefinitely detain anyone under the National Defense Authorization Act.

This comes as a blow to the ruling that was given earlier this year, when US District Court Judge Catherine Forrest ruled that the NDAA was unconstitutional. So what does this mean for journalists and why was it overturned?

Note: Here’s three stories in the last 24 hours explaining why the United States government can not be allowed to have this power under any circumstance:

Related Posts :

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Update: Michigan Counties Continue the Fight Against NDAA

 

 

Update: Michigan Counties Continue the Fight Against NDAA

From The NEW AMERICAN

Written by   –  01 October 2012

Soon Michigan may join the list of other states who have passed legislation checking the president’s power under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) to indefinitely detain American citizens.

On Monday, September 24, constitutionalists and friends of liberty gathered at the Oakland County (Michigan) General Government Committee Meeting to support Commissioner Jim Runestad’s Liberty Preservation Resolution.

Blake Filippi of the Tenth Amendment Center (TAC) originally drafted this measure with the assistance of the Rhode Island Liberty Coalition. 

Reports to The New American from those attending the meeting indicate that many residents attended the meeting, as well, and passionately defended the right of Americans to live without the specter of an all-powerful police state looming over their every action.

One citizen, Anna Janek, stood at the meeting and recounted a childhood living in fear of government and police in communist Czechoslovakia.

A follow-up meeting to consider the anti-NDAA proposal is scheduled for Monday, October 8 and 9:30 A.M.

Apart from the noble work being done in Oakland County, State Representative Tom McMillin (R-Rochester Hills, pictured above, at left) has introduced a bill in the state legislature that would prevent the president’s power to indefinitely detain Americans from crossing the Wolverine state borders.

McMillin’s measure, HB 5768, would prevent the arrest and indefinite detention of citizens of his state under the authority of relevant provisions of the NDAA.

According to the text of the legislation

No agency of this state, no political subdivision of this state, no employee of an agency of this state or a political subdivision of this state acting in his or her official capacity,

and no member of the Michigan national guard on official state duty shall aid an agency of the armed forces of the United States in any investigation, prosecution, or detention of any person pursuant to 50 USC 1541, as provided by the federal national defense authorization act for fiscal year 2012.

The day after citizens turned out to support the cause of freedom in Oakland County, over 40 concerned Michiganders attended the Michigan State House Oversight, Reform and Ethics Committee chaired by Representative McMillin.

Led by TAC state coordinator Shane Trejo, representatives from a coalition of groups devoted to the protection of individual liberty testified in favor of McMillin’s bill and the principle of due process. The organizations present at the hearing included People Against NDAA, Campaign for Liberty, Downsize D.C., the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, and the ACLU among others.

Notably, consistent defender of the Constitution Congressman Justin Amash (R-Mich.) appeared before the committee and spoke in support of HB 5768.

As readers may remember, Amash’s effort to repeal the indefinite detention provisions of the NDAA for 2013 was blocked in May when by a vote of 238-182, members of the House of Representatives voted to renew the president’s power to arrest and indefinitely detains Americans suspected of posing a threat to national security.

At the committee meeting in Lansing, however,  no testimony in favor of the NDAA was heard.

In a statement, Representative McMillin recognized Amash for his aid to the cause of liberty.

“I appreciate the support from Congressman Amash, who has fought against the federal law that enables the executive branch to arrest and indefinitely detain anyone on U.S. soil using the slightest thread of evidence or suspicion,” McMillin said.

“Michigan residents should not be party to what most people consider an unconstitutional infringement on the rights of citizens by indefinitely imprisoning someone under the most ambiguous of terms,” he added. 

Other parts of Michigan are actively engaged in the good cause of fighting for liberty.

In Allegan County, County Commissioner Bill Sage is working with his colleagues and encouraging them to get behind a county resolution specifically supporting HB 5768.

Sage’s goal, according to a press release issued by People Against the NDAA (PANDA), is “to get all 83 counties to pass a county resolution in support of HB5768.”

It is primarily thanks to the tireless efforts of County Commissioner Sage that by a vote of 8-3, the Allegan County Commission passed a resolution reaffirming the principles of the McMillin bill.

Allegan County’s resolution explicitly rejects the exercise in that jurisdiction of the NDAA’s indefinite detention provisions.

The resolution reads:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Allegan County Board of Commissioners condemns in no uncertain terms Sections 1021 and 1022 of the 2012 NDAA as they purport to:

1)  Repeal Posse Comitatus and authorize the President of the United States to utilize the Armed Forces of the United States to police the United States of America,

2)  Indefinitely detain persons captured within the United States of America without charge until the end of hostilities as purportedly authorized by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force,

3)  Subject persons captured within the United States of America to military tribunals, and

4)  Transfer persons captured within the United States of America to a foreign country or foreign entity

In a letter to the editor of the Allegan County News, Sage explained to readers the purpose of the resolution:

In order to protect these [constitutional] rights, it is time for Michiganders to speak up against this unconstitutional federal law.

On July 26, I presented the Allegan Liberty Preservation Resolution to the Allegan County Board of Commissioners with the intent of passing support for State Rep. Tom McMillin’s Michigan Liberty Bill, HB 5768,

which makes it illegal in the state of Michigan for any official of the state, be they National Guard or any other official, to assist in the investigation or arrest of any citizen of Michigan in connection to sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA.

The resolution also states that all agencies of Allegan County up to and including the Allegan County Sheriff Department and all police departments in the jurisdiction of Allegan County are instructed to decline requests from federal agencies acting under detention powers of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA that could infringe upon county residents’ constitutional rights.

It should be of the first priority of all our elected officials, from the governor, U.S. Senate, Congress, states senate, state representatives, right down the line to the board of commissioners, to aggressively defend our country and constitution in every avenue possible.

All Americans should be encouraged by the efforts underway in Michigan and elsewhere to enforce the Tenth Amendment and to prevent the unchecked growth of the power of the federal government.

The Tenth Amendment mandates:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

In the statement issued by PANDA, Dennis Marburger of Bloomfield, Michigan, explained the critical role of the Tenth Amendment in safeguarding the sovereignty of the states from the constant usurpations of Washington:

Thomas Jefferson called this the cornerstone of the Constitution.

When Freedom of Speech was under attack by President Adams in 1798, Jefferson went to Kentucky in order to fight back through his Kentucky resolves where he enunciated the concept of Nullification, which he called the “rightful remedy” to D.C.’s lawlessness and violations of the Constitution.

James Madison went to Virginia and and wrote the Virginia Resolves calling for state interposition between the people and Feds when the latter unconstitutionally endanger the former.

Thus was born “the Spirit of ’98”.

The State of Michigan joined other Northern states in employing noncompliance / Nullification to resist the Fugitive Slave Act and government sanctioned kidnapping in the 1850’s.

Finally, in a statement to The New American, Dan Johnson, the founder of PANDA, praised the people and lawmakers of Michigan for their commendable work on behalf of freedom.

“We are very excited about what is happening in Michigan right now and, with leaders like Dennis Marburger, Bill Sage and Ray Kirkus, we fully expect Rep. Tom Mcmillin’s bill to pass out of committee and onto a full floor vote in Michigan,” Johnson said.

By passing similar anti-NDAA resolutions, counties and states across American can proudly join several other state and local authorities in taking a stand against the federal government’s use of the NDAA to abolish centuries old due process and habeas corpus protections.

The New American will continue to report on all efforts nationwide to oppose the unconstitutional indefinite detention provisions of the NDAA.

Photo: Rep. Tom McMillin is joined at the State of the State Address by Gary Glenn of the American Family Association 

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

US intel effort named citizens, not terrorists

 

 

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on October 3, 2012 by Admin

WHLT 22 

 WASHINGTON (AP)  A multi billion dollar information-sharing program created in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001 has improperly collected information about innocent Americans and produced little valuable intelligence on terrorism, a U.S. Senate report concludes.

It portrays an effort that ballooned far beyond anyone’s ability to control.

What began as an attempt to put local, state and federal officials in the same room analyzing the same intelligence has instead cost huge amounts of money for data-mining software, flat screen televisions and, in Arizona, two fully equipped Chevrolet Tahoes that are used for commuting, investigators found.

“The … investigation could identify no reporting which uncovered a terrorist threat, nor could it identify a contribution such fusion center reporting made to disrupt an active terrorist plot,” the report said.

When the program did address terrorism, it sometimes did so in ways that infringed on civil liberties.

The fusion centers have made headlines for circulating information about the American Civil Liberties Union, activists on both sides of the abortion debate, war protesters and advocates of gun rights.

One fusion center cited in the Senate investigation wrote a report about a Muslim community group’s list of book recommendations. Others discussed American citizens speaking at mosques or talking to Muslim groups about parenting.

The bipartisan report is a scathing evaluation of what the Department of Homeland Security has held up as a crown jewel of its security efforts.

The report underscores a reality of post-9/11 Washington: National security programs tend to grow, never shrink, even when their money and manpower far surpass the actual subject of terrorism. Much of this money went for ordinary local crime-fighting.

Homeland Security says the report is outdated, inaccurate and too focused on information produced by the program, ignoring benefits to local governments from their involvement with federal intelligence officials.

Because of a convoluted grants process set up by Congress, Homeland Security officials don’t know how much they have spent in their decade-long effort to set up so-called fusion centers in every state.

Government estimates range from less than $300 million to $1.4 billion in federal money, plus much more invested by state and local governments. Federal funding is pegged at about 20 percent to 30 percent.

Despite that, Congress is unlikely to stop the funding. That’s because, whether it stops terrorists, the program means politically important money for state and local governments.

A Senate Homeland Security subcommittee reviewed more than 600 unclassified reports over a one-year period and concluded that most had nothing to do with terrorism.

No evidence of criminal activity was contained in those reports.

The government did not circulate them, but it kept them on government computers.

The federal government is prohibited from storing information about First Amendment activities not related to crimes.

“It was not clear why, if DHS had determined that the reports were improper to disseminate, the reports were proper to store indefinitely,” the report said.

Homeland Security Department spokesman Matthew Chandler called the report “out of date, inaccurate and misleading.”

He said that it focused entirely on information being produced by fusion centers and did not consider the benefit the involved officials got receiving intelligence from the federal government.

The report is as much an indictment of Congress as it is the Homeland Security Department.

In setting up the department, lawmakers wanted their states to decide what to spend the money on.

Time and again, that set-up has meant the federal government has no way to know how its security money is being spent.

Inside Homeland Security, officials have long known there were problems with the reports coming out of fusion centers, the report shows.

“You would have some guys, the information you’d see from them, you’d scratch your head and say, ‘What planet are you from?’ an unidentified Homeland Security official told Congress.

Until this year, the federal reports officers received five days of training and were never tested or graded afterward, the report said.

States have had criminal analysis centers for years.

But the story of fusion centers began in the frenzied aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The 9/11 Commission urged better collaboration among government agencies. As officials realized that a terrorism tip was as likely to come from a local police officer as the CIA, fusion centers became a hot topic.

But putting people together to share intelligence proved complicated. Special phone and computer lines had to be installed.

The people reading the reports needed background checks.

Some information could only be read in secure areas, which meant construction projects.

All of that cost money.

Meanwhile, federal intelligence agencies were under orders from Congress to hire more analysts.

That meant state and local agencies had to compete for smart counterterrorism thinkers.

And federal training for local analysts wasn’t an early priority.

Though fusion centers receive money from the federal government, they are operated independently.

Counterterrorism money started flowing to states in 2003.

But it wasn’t until late 2007 that the Bush administration told states how to run the centers.

State officials soon realized there simply wasn’t that much local terrorism-related intelligence.

Terrorist attacks didn’t happen often, but police faced drugs, guns and violent crime every day.

Normal criminal information started moving through fusion centers.

Under federal law, that was fine.

When lawmakers enacted recommendations of the 9/11 Commission in 2007, they allowed fusion centers to study “criminal or terrorist activity.”

The law was co-sponsored by Sens. Susan Collins and Joe Lieberman, the driving forces behind the creation of Homeland Security.

Five years later, Senate investigators found, terrorism is often a secondary focus.

“Many fusion centers lacked either the capability or stated objective of contributing meaningfully to the federal counterterrorism mission,” the Senate report said.

“Many centers didn’t consider counterterrorism an explicit part of their mission, and federal officials said some were simply not concerned with doing counterterrorism work.”

When Janet Napolitano became Homeland Security secretary in 2009, the former Arizona governor embraced the idea that fusion centers should look beyond terrorism.

Testifying before Congress that year, she distinguished fusion centers from the FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Forces that are the leading investigative and analytical arms of the domestic counterterrorism effort.

“A JTTF is really focused on terrorism and terrorism-related investigations,” she said. “Fusion centers are almost everything else.”

Congress, including the committee that authored the report, supports that notion. And though the report recommends the Senate reconsider the amount of money it spends on fusion centers, that seems unlikely.

“Congress and two administrations have urged DHS to continue or even expand its support of fusion centers, without providing sufficient oversight to ensure the intelligence from fusion centers is commensurate with the level of federal investment,” the report said.

And following the release of the report, Homeland Security officials indicated their continued strong support for the program.

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK So Far

 

 

From the Trenches World Report

Posted on October 3, 2012 by Sheila and Dan

On our survivalist web site we get lots of questions from people considering becoming Preppers/Survivalists. 

In the course of these contacts we’ve met lots of different types of people and that gives me hope for the future.  

We’ve been amazed how many people are waking up, as compared to 25+ years ago – when there was no one we could talk to!

Some people who have contacted us are sincerely looking for information on how to prep, while others are looking for an excuse not to prep. 

Then there is another type of person considering prepping.

These people remind me of an old story about the Empire State Building.

As the story goes, a man rode the elevator to the outdoor observation platform of the Empire State Building.  

Once there, he climbs over the fence and jumps off the platform, 101 stories up.  As he passed their window, people standing at the 50th floor windows could plainly hear the jumper say, “I’m OK so far!”

And that’s how it is for most people.  

As long as the problem is down the road, it’s not something to worry about today.

That is why we call people like that the “I’m OK so Far” crowd.

Time and again we have heard  from people who tell us that their plan is to retire in 2015 and then they will look into  getting some storage foods and a bug out place.

You see, their plans are based on their comfort zone,   not on reality.

With all the worries the world holds for us today, we need to be cautious of being too complacent when it comes to our preparations for what is soon coming down the pike.

We all have our favorite pundits –   for some of us that would be Gerald Celente, for others Alex Jones, some follow Steve Quayle and others. None of the pundits are predicting a rosy future.

Food Riots, Dollar Collapse and War are just a few of the concerns that face us in the near future.  

 Take a look at these headlines (Caution: if this stuff is news to you, it will probably piss you off):

Food Shortages

Dollar Collapse

War

For many people, understanding the rationale of global war is where their minds fall into cognitive dissonance, that is, the inability to deal with the reality of a specific situation, such as, “I know the government would never start an unjust war.” 

It is this cognitive dissonance that keeps some from taking their foot off third base so that they can get to home plate.

Why would any rational, sane mind want global nuclear war with millions – possibly billions – dead????

  Eugenics. 

The elite are into death cults, and they are nostalgic for the days when they, TPTB,  used to place a dead animal in the village well to kill off the surplus population. 

Now these mad men have nuclear weapons and can do a lot more damage than placing a dead rat in a well.

Their stated goal is to kill off all but 500 million people, who will then have the honor of acting as their serfs/slaves.

The food shortage is a constructed crisis.  Making gasoline from  corn was a good method of making corn prices skyrocket.

 Add to that a manufactured drought (HAARP/Chemtrails induced), and now there is no corn to speak of in the USA. 

Cows at feedlots are now being fed spoiled candy and pastries due to the extreme drought and loss of the corn crop in the Midwest. 

Many other crops are failing all over the world as well. 

It’s an established fact that famine in coming to our near future.

And when it comes to the dollar collapse, the evidence is very clear to anyone who is watching.

  Even Max Keiser said yesterday on Alex Jones that he predicts a 70% inflation rate by next Spring. 

Let’s put that into perspective.

Eggs $2.50 per dozen now, after 70% inflation by Spring will cost $4.25

Gas at $3.90 will cost $6.63

and $50 worth of clothing will cost $85

The simple fact  is that most Americans will not be able to cope with our financial future. 

Precious few are coping today!  If you don’t already have a supply of good, wholesome storage foods, get some now

If you live in a high population density area and don’t have a place to get away to,  find that place now!

The truth is that our immediate future is not rosy. 

Still we have hope for  a brighter future after the chaos and hope very much that many of the “I’m OK so far” and “Survival Tourist” types  and others will join us in the future world. 

But the need to begin prepping is real and it is now.

I want to offer this invitation to you to contact us. 

If you have any questions that we may be able to help with, please drop us a line. 

Time is short.

Dan and Sheila are the authors of  Surviving Survivalism – How to Avoid Survivalism Culture Shock and hosts of the free podcast, Still Surviving with Dan and Sheila”, both available at  http://survivingsurvivalism.com/ 

For information about their survival community, or for other questions, they can be reached at surviving@lavabit.com

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

Printable Gun Revolution Moving Forward Despite Corporate Second Amendment Fears

 

 

From PrisonPlanet.com

Adan Salazar
Prison Planet.com
October 3, 2012

The company that rented out the 3D printer that was to be used in the testing and design phase of a group’s revolutionary gun manufacturing concept took their equipment back last week, however, a persistent Cody Wilson explains he and his organization aren’t deterred in their efforts to bring the idea to fruition.

Printable Gun Revolution Moving Forward Despite Corporate Second Amendment Fears tumblr mazu1pNt361rfbrr0o1 1280Stratasys’ letter to Wilson. 

Their idea is nothing short of a slap in the face to gun legislation everywhere: an open-source site where gun enthusiasts from around the world convene to share and download gun design blueprints and files.

When Stratasys Inc, the 3D printer manufacturing company that leased the printer, caught wind of what Cody Wilson and his organization Defense Distributed were planning to use their printer for, they issued an email last week stating they would need to confiscate their printer prior to it even being used.

“They came for it straight up…I didn’t even have it out of the box,” Wilson told Wired’s Danger Room.

Wilson, a 2nd year University of Texas law student, and his group raised $20,000 last month to fund an operation known as the Wiki Weapon Project.

The project’s goal was to produce a firearm solely using a 3D printer to manufacture all parts. Once the plans are tested and finalized, the group would then upload the files to the Internet for literally anyone to download, print and ultimately assemble.

The email was addressed to Wilson himself and came on behalf of Stratasys’ Legal Counsel, stating:

“It is the policy of Stratasys not to knowingly allow its printers to be used for illegal purposes. Therefore, please be advised that your lease of the Stratasys uPrint SE is canceled at this time and Stratasys is making arrangements to pick up the printer.”

“The only protest I had, the only exchange back I had was, “Well, legal counsel, our opinion is if these weapons are title I weapons, we don’t need registration, we don’t need license, we don’t need anyone’s approval to do this. This is totally legal, this is America,” you know? Patriotism,” Wilson told Infowars.com.

“That wasn’t good enough for them, and they emailed me back and they said “Look, we’re not gonna get into a legal debate about it. We want it back,” and so fine.”

Stratasys legal counsel may very well be in the wrong.

As CNET’s Rick Brown explains, it matters what type of gun you’re planning to produce, and whether or not you’re planning on selling your services as a gunsmith or the manufactured weapons.

“If you aim to sell your services as a gunsmith (e.g., “I charge $50 an hour to make a gun”) or you intend to sell the weapon once you’ve made it (e.g., “I charge $500 for this particular gun”), you need to obtain a federal manufacturer’s license. [1140] If the weapon is for personal use, no manufacturing license is required.”

Since 3D printed firearms manufacture is still in its infancy, actually in its conception phase, it still falls into a sort of legal gray area, however, Wilson believes Stratasys has been disingenuous in their statements to other media.

“So Stratasys is saying and suggesting to other people, “Well, they can follow the law like anyone else.” The suggestion is that we weren’t going to. They’re pretending and hiding behind the law, when really they just don’t want to associate with the project. That’s disingenuous and they mistreated us and fine, I’m not in some personal vendetta against them, it’s just… they’re pretending.”

Printable Gun Revolution Moving Forward Despite Corporate Second Amendment Fears kt1911rCompanies like KTordnance.com sell unfinished frames to start a custom built firearm.

Indeed, the idea that a company can overbearingly control what people do with their product is bordering on an old world manufacturer mentality in which industries would control what people did with their technologies to the point of managing channels of distribution and production.

“No that’s not what this machine is. This machine’s about doing anything with the machine,” Wilson says.

The printer abduction was nothing to write home about.

Wilson says Stratasys hired third party couriers to retrieve their equipment.

Previously, Defense Distributed ran into trouble when their first open donation site Indiegogo canceled their account and refunded all donations a mere 22 days after its open.

Indiegogo sent Defense Distributed an email saying its funds had been frozen due to “unusual account activity,” and followed up with an explanation that it had violated Indiegogo’s terms of service, which don’t allow the sale of “ammunition, firearms, or certain firearm parts or accessories.”

Wilson contends he read the terms and doesn’t believe he violated them. “My reading of their terms is we didn’t give anyone the option to sell or buy firearms. The exchange was they give us money, we give them information. That’s the project. Not firearms, not ammunition.”

Ever the tenacious micro-entrepreneur, Wilson didn’t let the account cancellation thwart his group’s drive to succeed.

They raised their $20,000 goal last month, circumventing Indiegogo by inserting Paypal and Bitcoin donation widgets on their original site.

Since Wilson was running into dead ends, he figured he had nothing to lose by going to Austin’s ATF branch to once and for all absolve himself of any criminal wrongdoing.

“And they were more than happy to talk to me, but they said, “Actually, it’s interesting you came because we were looking for you” and that’s not something you want to hear,” laughed Wilson.

Printable Gun Revolution Moving Forward Despite Corporate Second Amendment Fears atf crest

“The ATF involvement was mostly at my direction. A lot of people say, “Why go to them?” but at this point I can’t get any answers from our lawyers. I’m not getting anywhere in reading the law myself.

Everything’s intentionally kinda vague and ambiguous. And the technology’s really kind of outpaced the regulations…And so began a sort of quasi-interrogation.

They were writing things down and asking me who I was. I told them who I was and what the project was. And I explained 3D printing to them, and so it went from imposing to really friendly.”

Ultimately, Wilson took away he’d have to do something he’d been avoiding; turn his company into a legal entity and get licensed.

“ We’re gonna have to do the license because that’s the world we live in, apparently. And I think that’s unfortunate and I think it’s silly. Maybe it’s not so silly because this is firearms we’re talking about.

But look, this speaks to the attitude toward micro-entrepreneurs and the attitude towards ideas in general in this country. You can’t do anything without somebody’s permission.

I believe that. You interested in the natural world? You want to do something with chemicals? People are gonna look at you like you’re suspect.

Like you’re some kind of drug dealer. You can’t do anything of any consequence with any curiosity in this country without being weighed, measured, forced into some institution or system that ties to register everything.

I’ll be in every database from now until the end of time because I was simply curious.”

Wilson adds, “I want to be sure that people know that there are no right answers to this. Is it Title I is it Title II? Well that’s a test case, and I’m not gonna be that guy in front of some article III judge saying, “But I thought it was fine.”

Another hurdle that’s in the near future is the Undetectable Firearms Act which makes it unlawful to manufacture a firearm that is not detectable by a walk-through metal detector or x-ray machines, but Wilson isn’t giving up his secret on how he’s planning to bypass this piece of legislation: “ We’ve been pretty public about telling people what we’re doing but I’m not sure I want to give away the legal strategy here. Let’s keep it a secret. Bottom line, we’re gonna follow the law.”

Printable Gun Revolution Moving Forward Despite Corporate Second Amendment Fears Cody Wilson Defense Distr 010

Getting another printer after the seizure won’t be a problem as various people have already contacted Wilson, but he says his top priority at this time will be to take care of the legal side of things as a preventative effort to any prosecutors who may choose to exercise too much discretion.

The precedent that would be established in offering open-source blueprints for 3D printable guns would definitely be detrimental to any effort geared towards disarming the population.

Riding the wave of recent domestic terror incidents, the gun-grabbing lobby is in an all-out frenzy to portray gun owners and gun legislation as murderous and contradictory to the good of the people.

Largely ignored, however, is the fact that a population left helpless and dependent on the state and their police is exactly what the founding fathers were trying to prevent in crafting the Second Amendment.

It remains to be seen if a printed gun will actually work, and Wilson admits even he’s a little skeptical.

“People say, well people didn’t know you could print guns with this technology. I don’t know if you can. That’s what this whole thing’s about. We’re willing to try, you know? How’s that so controversial? And it seems the closer I get, the further I am away from trying.”

One thing’s certain; if Defense Distributed succeeds in their efforts, as long as there’s a free Internet and someone has a 3D printer, all you’ll really need is ammo.

Below is the video Defense Distributed released in July:

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,000+ Supporters to Ron Paul: Please Run as an Independent or Libertarian!

 

 

From Ron Paul.com Fan Site

by RonPaul.com on October 3, 2012

Dear Ron Paul,

You are at the right place and at the right time not only to educate Americans about the principles of personal liberty, sound money, free markets and a sensible pro-America foreign policy, but also to continue the Revolution and lead us to victory.

We the undersigned don’t want to change the GOP — we want to change America.

We pledge to “write in” your name on the presidential ballot this November 6th no matter what happens until then.

Please consider quitting the GOP and officially announcing your candidacy as an Independent.

We pledge to assist you in every way we can.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

END

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Fair Use Notice):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this website. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

Advertisements

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

REAL NEWS July 16, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on July 15, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : July 16, 2012

===============================================================================================

{XANIEL’S NOTE : I had ever intention of  publishing a new page into this website called, ” THE ELIXIR OF LIFE “

I, of course, highly underestimated the amount of editing involved in order to get the page ready, up and published.

It is going to take a little longer than I had planned,

however I should have it up in the next few days, possible a week at most. }~~~Xaniel777

========================================================================================

9 Ways The Hijacked Federal Government Is Waging War Against The American People

 

From PrisonPlanet.com

Saman Mohammadi
The Excavator
November 10, 2011

“The minute we fell for 9/11 we signed our doom,” said Paul Craig Roberts on the Alex Jones Show on November 9, 2011.

Alex responded, “9/11 is America’s death warrant.”

In the ten years since 9/11, America has been turned into a third world police state with a large underclass, a rapidly declining middle class, and a plutocracy that has broken its economic, political and emotional ties with America.

America’s traitorous political establishment has abandoned ship.

They are treating America like a dump.

Instead of building new bridges and creating jobs at home, they are shipping jobs overseas and forcing millions of Americans to beg for a piece of meat.

Even the body parts of American war heroes are discarded in landfill sites.

That act is symbolic of the fact that the new world order traitors in Washington think of the American people as garbage and dirt.

On 9/11, the new world order traitors declared war on America and humanity.

So far, they have carried out the war from behind the scenes, in the shadows, inside the heart of government, while posing as America’s protectors.

But that could change any day because the police state infrastructure that they have constructed in the last three decades in the guise of fighting terrorism and stopping the flow of drugs into America has given them the ability to wage their war against America out in the open.

They have the resources and the will to completely destroy America. All that is missing is the perfect storm.

After the snakes of the new world order cause the perfect storm the wolves of the new world order will be unleashed on America.

At that point, the war against America and humanity will enter a new stage.

Below I’ve listed nine ways that the new world order traitors are conducting their war against the American people and American constitution.

1. Military Checkpoints by the TSA and Homeland Security.

Checkpoints are being set up all across America to search for bombs, guns, political literature, and other items that the hijacked government in D.C. is afraid of.

Supporters of Ron Paul and libertarianism are singled out as lone wolves who pose a threat to social stability.

In the airports, people are manhandled like lap rats and their basic dignity is stripped from them.

The new world order guards are treating the American people like prisoners because they are afraid and scared.

They want to kill the spirit of America because they know that once that spirit is awakened they will be finished in a flash.

Only the American people have the power to destroy their fascist agenda and save humanity from global despotism.

2. Media Censorship And Media Ridicule of Patriots.

There are so many examples of the establishment media’s censorship of fundamental issues.

The truth is regarded as the enemy by journalists, editors, and “news” executives.

Former Gov. Jesse Ventura’s heroic resistance to the tyrannical TSA and his court hearing was treated as a joke by the establishment media and immediately ignored, despite its huge implications for American society.

Ventura voiced his anger at the media on the Alex Jones show on November 8, saying, “It seems I’m running into a brick wall with the media. Mainstream media won’t discuss the case, they don’t think it is relevant at all. In fact, I was due to do CNN yesterday and I was bumped because of course the big trial verdict was coming down in the Michael Jackson case. And so that has more importance.”

Ventura said he told the CNN producer, “Well, I completely understand, after all, mine is simply a constitutional issue. Why would that take preference over, you know, Michael Jackson’s verdict on his drug overdose.” Ventura then added, “but that’s our pop culture media.”

3. State-Sponsored Terrorism.

The Oklahoma City Bombing and the September 11 attacks proved that the American people are sacrificial pawns in the global war against all nations that is being waged secretly by the new world order traitors.

No American is safe from the evil of the hijacked federal government and its master, the international banking empire.

Every human being is threatened by the demons in Washington and their comrades in Israel and England.

The next inside job in America may be a Nuclear 9/11.

Hundreds of thousands of Americans may get incinerated by the evil terrorists in Washington and Israel to help gain public support for the coming wars against Iran and Pakistan.

4. Implosion of The American Economy.

America does not have an economy.

It has a prison industry, a financial industry, an entertainment industry, and a military industry.

Its insides have been gutted.

The heart, the liver, all the organs that make a nation healthy and strong have all been pulled out by the new world order traitors.

The 2008 banking crisis was created on purpose to phase out the American dollar and introduce a new global currency and global central bank.

Trillions of dollars have been stolen from the American people by the big banks, and the privately owned Federal Reserve.

Everybody can see that America’s national interest and has been sabotaged by the international banking regime and their traitorous agents in Washington.

They have destroyed the common good in America, and ruined any chance of an economic recovery in the near future.

5. Attempted Destruction of Alternative Narratives, Currencies, Food, Farming, And Medicine.

The political mantra that “There is no alternative” is a lie.

The new world order traitors want one enslaved world community, one despotic world government, and one politically crafted global reality.

They don’t want any questioning of their system. They hate critical dialogue and debate.

They don’t care that their global authoritarian government is based on mass murder, theft, terrorism, deception, world wars, treason, and even global genocide.

They only want one version of history to be remembered and taught by future generations.

A small number of criminal corporations have been given monopolies by the federal government in all areas of life: food, money, security, information, transportation, etc.

All these corporations are in favor of a global fascist state because they hate economic competition and the free market system.

The 9/11 truth and justice movement is the greatest threat to the fascist new world order because we have the force of truth on our side.

We have the facts and scientific evidence to prove that the criminals in Washington, London and Israel are mass murderers and state terrorists.

6. Saddling New Debts on The American People by Waging Criminal and Fraudulent Wars Overseas.

In the stable of nations, America is the most powerful and beautiful horse.

This horse was stolen and poisoned with lies and propaganda on December 23, 1913, when the international banking criminals established their Federal Reserve System.

America is not just any horse.

It is a work horse and a war horse, and it excels at both because of the spirit and productivity of the American people.

The Banksters and corporate fascists are using the American horse to pillage the planet and conquer all nations.

When the American horse becomes exhausted and can no longer push the new world order agenda through the marshes of history, the new world order rider will hop off and kill it.

The traitors in D.C. want to do this gently, but if the American people resist, then the American horse will be killed violently.

Its replacement is a horse from hell: the global fascist state.

For now, the American horse will be saddled with debts.

The American people will be forced to pay back these debts to the international banking gang at gunpoint, or they will start a new revolution to wipe out all the false financial debts and the debts that were incurred as a result of the war on terror scam and irresponsible bank bailouts.

7. Surveillance.

A sophisticated surveillance grid has been created in America to track everybody’s consumer behavior, political beliefs, and daily routines.

There is no privacy in Totalitarian America.

Everybody is under the thumb of Big Brother.

There will be chaos when the system crashes and the economy collapses.

That is when the complete surveillance grid will be rolled out and used against the American people.

People who even think about resisting the banksters and corporate fascists will be targeted for execution.

8. A Police State Infrastructure With Concentration Camps, Torture Facilities, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Mass Graves.

The threat that America and humanity is facing is not really a “war,” but global genocide.

We are all natives now.

9/11 was to our generation and our civilization what the sight of European ships was to the native inhabitants of North America.

They were killed off like bugs.

The 99% are being treated in the same way.

Brainwashed agents of state terrorists will enforce the global totalitarian regime’s orders and kill dissidents in every continent, slum, suburb, and village.

Americans will be buried in mass graves and landfills like everybody else.

No nation will be left alone.

Human life is worthless waste according to the soulless globalist banksters and new world order traitors.

They see humanity as a cancer, and they are treating us accordingly.

9. Release of Bio Weapons, And Global Plagues Like The Avian Flu.

A global plague will kill off at least 2 billion people, including millions of Americans.

Such a reality will be celebrated by the new world order traitors and mass murderers.

They will rejoice after they set the whole world on fire and reduce civilization to a state of pure savagery and barbarism.

The rule of law has already been shattered by the demons in Washington. It is every man for himself now.

We are all back in the jungle, and facing all the terror that comes with living in a state of lawlessness.

Imagine what will happen when a global emergency is declared two weeks into a global health crisis.

People will turn into animals. They will see death all around them.

The evil of world war, plus a global economic crisis and a world plague will devastate and ruin our societies.

And that is the point.

All this has been planned by the sociopathic and evil ruling elite that hijacked America.

They want terror, a global war, a global economic crisis, a global plague, and total global chaos, so they can offer their global government as a solution to these catastrophes.

In the process, they are bringing all nations into a state of poverty, war, fear, and slavery.

We can respond in two ways to this dark reality: with denial, or with vengeance.

We face two futures: the annihilation of America and humanity, or the resurrection of both.

END

 

 

 

 

 

Senate To Gut Second Amendment?

 

From The Western Center For Journalism

JULY 14, 2012 BY  

guns SC Senate To Gut Second Amendment?

As New York City plays host to a conference that will shape the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) into final form, most 2nd Amendment supporters are concerned that stealth language or overly broad applications woven into the document will serve to separate Americans from their right to keep and bear arms.

After all, why else would preliminary versions of the Treaty be so difficult to obtain and U.N. pre-conference position statements remain consistently absent from the internet?

Barack Hussein Obama leads the most anti-gun rights Administration in the nation’s history.

Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, and recently appointed ATF Acting Director B. Todd Jones have spoken often and passionately about the importance of implementing more restrictive gun control legislation.

But the gun-grabbing Regime will not be able to ratify the UN’s global gun control measure without first securing a 2/3rds majority of Senators to vote in favor.

And it won’t be easy to convince 67 politicians to sign onto a document that countless critics have spent nearly a decade rightly representing as a worldwide assault on the 2nd Amendment.

Especially not as the American public must once again be told that the document has to be “passed” in order to find out what’s IN it!

Late last year, the Heritage Foundation obtained an ATT “Draft Paper” from an NGO participating in the Treaty mark-up.

The Paper makes it clear that the finished product would be broad in scope, controlling everything “from rifle scopes to battleships.” And although the Treaty purports to monitor only “international arms transfers,” document language shows the UN also wishes to control “internal transfers” as “any firearm transfer—meaning any change in ownership…might conceivably somehow affect another nation…”

Therefore, the ATT will demand that signatories control and monitor “transfers including ‘transport’ across national territory.”

To accomplish this, a nation would necessarily “maintain records of all imports and shipments of arms that transit their territory,” creating records on “the type of arms transferred and their ‘end users’.”

So as international records would be kept of all weapons bought and sold within the United States, the Treaty would create not only a global arms registry but the rules by which arms might be transferred and to whom.

Would Senators sympathetic to global arms control try to slip these and other unconstitutional ATT edicts past American voters?

DC politicians—including Republicans—have already written purposely misleading and legally ineffective language into both the 2012 and 2013 National Defense Authorization Acts for the sole purpose of deceiving the American public into believing that their constitutional rights were being looked after.

As for treaties, they commonly include “reservations”, that is, language designed to “define and limit the effect of a ratified treaty.”

A few dedicated, gun-grabbing Senators might get the idea of attaching a codicil to the ATT, claiming it would prevent the ratified Treaty from imposing upon the 2nd Amendment rights of the American people, thereby safeguarding the right to keep and bear arms.

Of course, they wouldn’t bother to inform Americans that the Arms Trade Treaty specifically forbids any reservations that are “incompatible with the object and purpose” of the Treaty!

Would members of the Washington political class be so dishonest as to try such an underhanded stunt?

It’s doubtful that a sufficient number of Senators would risk the fury of the NRA and gun-owning voters.

But then again, stranger things have certainly happened in the nation’s capitol. 

After all, a Supreme Court Chief Justice has just prostituted both himself and the Constitution!

Maybe keeping tabs on the Senate wouldn’t be such a bad idea.

Follow Coach at twitter.com @KcoachcCoach

Photo credit: Gregory Wild-Smith (Creative Commons)

END

 

 

 

 

 

Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt Interview, Author of ‘The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America’

 

Published on Jul 11, 2012 by 

Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt joins us on the Smells Like Human Spirit Podcast with an incredible and wide-ranging 65 minute interview.

Charlotte is the author of ‘The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America’, and former Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education during the first term of U.S. President Ronald Reagan.

In our talk, we discussed, among other things:

The deliberate intent of those in government to use the classroom as a springboard to promote collectivism over individualism;

The shifting focus in Education from that of true learning to workforce training;

How operant conditioning is used to establish a stimulus-response culture in schools;

Why the self-proclaimed ‘elites’ view human beings as resources to serve economies;

The internationalist approach to Education and its link to proposed world government.

END

 

 

 

 

 

Congress Now Trying To Outlaw Reporting On Government Corruption

 

logo

From Before It’s News

Profile image

By Alexander Higgins (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories

 Website: The Alexander Higgins Blog

Lawmakers are pushing legislation through Congress that will criminalize reporting on illegal activities and corruption in the US government.

Just when you thought the United States government couldn’t sink any lower our beloved politicians in Washington have introduced legislation that will criminalize reporting on US government secrets.

What makes this new legislation shocking is that we have seen the US government repeatedly use the “State Secrets” and the “National InSecurity “ card to suspend the Constitution at will to commit a wide variety of heinous activities from torture and indefinite detention without trial to outright forced drugging of prisoners and even repeated assassination by the government, of people including  US citizens, which is now being done on the direction of the United States’ first even assassination czar.

Keeping that in mind if we take the fact that lawmakers are now trying to go after reporters that “publish government secrets” can easily be taken as an outright ban on reporting on government corruption PERIOD since at the end of the day any corrupt or illegal activities conducted by government officials are done in secret by the government in the first place.

This week, House Republicans sought legal advice on whether reporters can be prosecuted for leaking secret information public and the excuse being used in a series of leaks by officials in the Obama administration that have pissed of the republicans.

The latest of those high-profile leaks revealed the true nature of America’s cyber warfare program and even President Obama’s secret assassination list.

Now Congress is trying to justify the outlawing of such reporting using the excuse of “comprising National Security” when the truth is the information was given to reporters in repeated interviews by government officials speaking on the condition of anonymity with the approval of the White House in the first place.

Once again our government is manufacturing yet another “crisis” that they can take advantage of to expand its evermore dictatorial powers in what has been nothing less than a full-scale war being waged by our government against the US Constitution.

Liz Wahl joins RT web producer Andrew Blake to discuss exactly what this would that mean for freedom of the press and free speech.

Related Posts :

 Read more at Alexander Higgins Blog

END

 

 

 

 

 

 Why so many Jews support Israel’s blatant injustice

(Original Title : Accusations of Jewish self-hatred and anti-Semitism as a strategy to hide from self-reflection)

 

From Redress

By Richard Forer

16 July 2012

Richard Forer explains why so many Jews support Israel’s blatant injustice towards the Palestinians, arguing that an honest self-examination by Israel’s Jewish supporters of the premises behind their demonization of Israel’s critics, and debunking the idealistic false image of Israel that they superimpose upon the Israel that actually exists, are key to a just solution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Anyone who follows the debate over Israel-Palestine knows how automatic and routine it is for one side to label those who disagree with Israel’s treatment of the Palestinian people as self-hating Jews, Israel haters or anti-Semites.

Hoping to calm the hysteria and add much-needed clarity to the issue, and unwilling to be silenced by these accusations, I’ve decided to share a brief adaptation from the “The Self-Hating Jew” chapter of my book, Breakthrough: Transforming Fear Into Compassion – A New Perspective on the Israel-Palestine Conflict. 

As an American Jew with ultra-Orthodox relatives living in Israel, a former member of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee(AIPAC) and a reflexive defender of Israel for more than 50 years, I believe I am as qualified as anyone to share my insights.

”The Self-Hating Jew”

In the past the label self-hating Jew, though rarely used, was associated with Jews who were ashamed of or who hid their religious and cultural heritage.

But as the debate over Israeli policy toward the Palestinian people has intensified, self-hating Jew, like anti-Semite, has become a routinely brandished and emotionally charged retaliatory weapon.

The idea that a three-word label can encapsulate the character of a person is problematic.

A human being is far more than what a single phrase can say about him, and self-hating Jew is so divisive that it makes tolerance and cooperation impossible; and it eradicates the possibility for real understanding.

For some Jews, support for Israeli policy is unconditional, even if it conflicts with traditional Jewish values.

For other Jews, these values are primary and ought to be associated with Israel’s compliance with international law.

If the former would make an effort to discover why the latter campaign for Palestinian equality, they would learn that they are making a conscious choice not to remain silent when witnessing one group’s denial of basic human rights to another group.

These Jews see their people, like the rest of mankind, as complex beings, capable of acts of inhumanity as well as acts of kindness.

They are able to concede that at times Israel does violate the rights of others, that it has used torture and mistreated and killed innocent people, and that its leaders do not always tell the truth about these acts.

They believe that the Israeli government has hijacked their heritage by replacing morality and brotherhood, once so valued in Judaism, with bigotry and exclusion.

Nearly every Jewish critic I’ve met believes that, by opposing policies that relegate Palestinians to lives of second-class citizenship, they are rescuing the integrity of their religious tradition.

They are, therefore, true friends of Israel.

“If calling on Israel to end its human rights abuses expresses hatred, are we to forsake a people who cry out against the destruction of their own homes or the traumatizing of their own children?”

A true friend will admonish his friend when he sees him acting irrationally toward his neighbour. These critics have no desire to harm the state of Israel.

Their desire is to prevent the state of Israel from harming Palestinians.

They advocate equal rights for all because they know that equal rights lead to peace.

This begs the question: what exactly is self-hating (or anti-Semitic) in such a position? Is honouring the humanistic values many Jews were taught at synagogue a betrayal of their Jewish roots?

Is caring about another people synonymous with hatred? Is learning about a painful subject likewise symptomatic of hatred?

Isn’t thirst for knowledge a hallmark of Judaism and isn’t it fundamental to solving problems?

If criticism of deliberate violations of international law expresses hatred, what does turning one’s back on the suffering of millions express?

If calling on Israel to end its human rights abuses expresses hatred, are we to forsake a people who cry out against the destruction of their own homes or the traumatizing of their own children?

So where, exactly, is the hatred? The hatred is in the minds of those who are afraid to ask why someone is critical of Israel.

Rather than conducting honest research to refute or confirm the criticism, the hater panders to his feelings of fear, confusion and anger, all of which are animated by unexamined beliefs and images within his own mind.

This mind colours his perception so that he sees the world in terms of personal victimhood versus the world’s hostility.

Because he is unconscious of the effect his feelings have on his perception, the hater can only project his perception onto the world and then presume that the world he sees proves the reality of his perception.

Creating his own suffering, he narcissistically scapegoats and blames the world (in this case Palestinians and their sympathizers) for his suffering.

Triggered through denial, this inner thought process attributes to Palestinians and their sympathizers the hater’s own hatred.

In other words, the hater makes the other responsible for, and the repository of, his unresolved pain.

He objectifies the other and rejects his humanity.

Then he supports inhumane policies, which he justifies under the guise of an existential danger to Israel.

In so doing, he brings the world’s anger down upon Israel which reinforces and perpetuates the cycle of perceived victimhood.

This entire process is a defence mechanism that stems from the fear of inquiring into one’s presumed identity through the questioning of one’s beliefs and images.

Labeling as hateful or anti-Semitic honest criticism of Israeli oppression is no different to labeling as anti-American honest criticism of America’s history of oppression toward people of colour.

And holding Israel to normative standards of conduct does not delegitimize anyone. What delegitimizes Israel are the behaviour and attitudes that humiliate an indigenous people.

“I have not met one defender of Israeli policy who has impartially studied the actual history. If they had the decency to do so, most would discover that they have character assassinated the Palestinians and facilitated their misfortune.”

I have not met one defender of Israeli policy who has impartially studied the actual history. If they had the decency to do so, most would discover that they have character assassinated the Palestinians and facilitated their misfortune.

The real conflict for these defenders is not Israel versus a hostile world or Israel versus the Palestinians.

The real conflict – and the basis for claims of self-hatred and anti-Semitism – is the failure to integrate the hard-to-believe but inescapable awareness of Israel’s treatment of non-Jews with unquestioned loyalty to the Jewish state.

One consideration acknowledges Israel’s dark side. The other denies the dark side exists. If these defenders want to distinguish the source of conflict and find peace they need to inquire within.

But there are no excuses! Willful blindness is a crime against humanity.  

Only by committing myself to the truth was I able to apprehend that, in reality, criticism of Israel was never a serious concern. Incredibly, I had never defended Israel, at least the Israel that actually exists.

I had always defended an idealistic image of Israel that was projected or superimposed upon the Israel that actually exists.

This projection enabled me to repress or deny painful revelations that I would have learned about Israel and about myself if only I had looked without the errant influence of an unexamined mind. Denial and projection go hand in hand.

What I denied about Israel and about myself, I projected onto the other who automatically and necessarily became my enemy.

The perspective formed from my projections revealed more about how I wished to see my people than how they really are when looked at in an honest light.

My attachment to certain beliefs and images was a defence designed to preserve a child-like faith in Israel as guardian of freedom and humanity.

Somehow, I had to reconcile my treasured images with the reality that conflicted with them.

However, rather than making use of the tension between these forces as a gateway to transformation, I spurned reality and adhered to the safety of indoctrination.

When friends I normally trusted pointed to Israeli deeds that seemed out of character, I reacted by ignoring or rationalizing the suffering of Palestinians.

Equating Palestinian freedom with Palestinian terrorism, I worried that if Israel relinquished strict control over its subjects, the lives of its citizens would be imperiled.

Fearing annihilation, I unconsciously superimposed Nazi images onto the Palestinian people, and then refused to believe that the Jewish state could act indefensibly toward them.

Fear prevented me from empathizing with the pain of Palestinians and it blinded me to the likelihood that a country I had invested so much faith in could administer such brutal policies.

I indoctrinated myself into the idea that some Jews were willfully ignorant of the evil intentions of the Palestinians, and that their willfulness demonstrated support for that which my unexamined mind feared most: the annihilation of the Jewish state.

“I judged Palestinian violence as a pathological expression of hatred, not the response of an oppressed people, a small minority of whom resort to violence as the only way they know to retain a measure of self-respect in the face of generations of violence inflicted upon them.”

Truthfully, my reaction to criticism was motivated more by the fear of taking on the challenge that the criticism posed to my identity than by genuine disagreement or fear for Israel’s existence.

For a split second, though, before denial and repression set in, this challenge reflected the prejudice that induced me to deny the humanity of the other.

And in order to avoid encountering my own lack of humanity, I ignored documented evidence, thereby consenting to the subjugation of millions.

I judged Palestinian violence as a pathological expression of hatred, not the response of an oppressed people, a small minority of whom resort to violence as the only way they know to retain a measure of self-respect in the face of generations of violence inflicted upon them.

By turning my back on the suffering of others, I had sacrificed the very values Israel once personified.

=====================

How is it that a person can be devoted to the well being of one group and hostile to the well being of another?

Is it true that there is an inherent difference between two peoples that justifies devotion to one and hostility towards the other?

Are such feelings real or has something been added that distorts feeling?

In my view, the determining factor is the labels that are applied to a people and the beliefs and images associated with the labels.

These labels are the mind’s attempt to resolve fear and gain security, but they occlude the very mechanism that can achieve these aims.

The ability to look and to feel is what achieves security.

This ability is inherent and it functions perfectly when there is no recoil from the circumstances of existence.

In simple practical situations it makes itself known. Everyone has experienced it.

There is a moment when you just know there is danger, when you know that a person is not to be trusted.

Then you act accordingly. You do not need one iota of belief about the situation.

You have no preconceptions and you are not recoiled from the situation.

You are simply being present. Then there is the real feeling that something is amiss.

What I am talking about is natural intelligence as the means for practical security.

If we look and feel, then certain things become clear.

But we have to renounce labels, we have to renounce the philosophy of us against them, and we have to end our recoil from the human reality of the conflict.

There is nothing to fear; we needn’t wait. Do we wait until we discover the nationality, race or origin of a person before we feel concern or neglect for him or her?

If so, then there is no real feeling at all. Our concern and our neglect are false.

Both are manifestations of fear and confusion.

Our automatic identification with one side of a conflict is selfish, founded upon an attachment that keeps us so inextricably bound that we have lost our connection to humanity.

We may tell ourselves we support an end to conflict, but as bearers of inner conflict we constantly subvert our goals.

Beyond the mind lies a vast expanse of freedom, unqualified by our presumed mortality as a separate person.

In this space of freedom true feeling arises; it flows from the heart.

In the field of human relations its expression is compassion. Compassion is the expression of peace and the means of peace.

When we know it then we also know that peace for the world is achievable.

======================

I never used the term self-hating Jew. I am thankful I didn’t. I believe the label is a powerful barrier to understanding.

The key to understanding is dispassionate intelligence. Fear and anger permeated every argument I made in defence of Israel.

Invariably I moved from the quandary of fear to the apparent certainty of anger.

But I never crossed over into hate. There is a special feeling that accompanies the words self-hating Jew.

The key is in “hate”. Characterizing someone in any way with this word introduces viciousness to the mind.

This viciousness makes the mind utterly dualistic – and utterly obtuse.

The subtle awareness that my ingrained perspective was perhaps incorrect would have been extinguished if I had described Israel’s Jewish critics as self-hating.

As it was, because I did not become involved in hate, I remained open to a dispassionate investigation of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

======================

The notion that any Jew who dedicates him or herself to justice for all people and who protests the unfair treatment of the downtrodden harbours self-hatred defies common sense.

Given the self-esteem it takes to stand for justice amid fierce denunciation, a more accurate assessment is that they are self-loving Jews.

======================

Richard Forer is author of the book Breakthrough: Transforming Fear into Compassion – A New Perspective on the Israel-Palestine Conflict.

END

 

 

 

 

 

Time Travelers

 

From about.com : Paranormal Phenomena

Stephen Wagner

By Stephen Wagner
Paranormal Phenomena Guide

Time machines might only be available in the movies, yet many people have experienced unexplained events that seem to be temporary but very real slips into the past and the future

Where and to what date would you go if you could travel through time?

It’s a question people have long enjoyed contemplating – the possibilities are so fraught with wonder and excitement.

Would you watch the pyramids of Egypt being build? Join the spectacle of a gladiatorial battle at the Roman Coliseum?

Catch a glimpse of real dinosaurs? Or would you prefer to see what the future holds for humankind?

Such fantasies have fueled the success of such stories as H.G. Welles’ The Time Machine, the Back to the Future movies, favorite episodes of “Star Trek” and countless science fiction novels.

And although some scientists think that it might be at least theoretically possible to travel through time, no one (as far as we know) has devised a sure-fire way to make it happen.

But that’s not to say that people haven’t reported traveling through time.

There are many fascinating anecdotes from those who say they seem to have quite unexpectedly visited – if only briefly – another time and, sometimes, another place.

These events, often called time slippages, seem to occur randomly and spontaneously.

Those who experience these events are often bewildered and confused by what they see and hear, and afterward are at a complete loss to explain them.

Here are some interesting cases that will keep you wondering:

FLIGHT INTO THE FUTURE

In 1935, Air Marshal Sir Victor Goddard of the British Royal Air Force had a harrowing experience in his Hawker Hart biplane.

Goddard was a Wing Commander at the time and while on a flight from Edinburgh, Scotland to his home base in Andover, England, he decided to fly over an abandoned airfield at Drem, not far from Edinburgh.

The useless airfield was overgrown with foliage, the hangars were falling apart and cows grazed where planes were once parked.

Goddard then continued his flight to Andover, but encountered a bizarre storm.

In the high winds of the storm’s strange brown-yellow clouds, he lost control of his plane, which began to spiral toward the ground.

Narrowly averting a crash, Goddard found that his plane was heading back toward Drem.

As he approached the old airfield, the storm suddenly vanished and Goddard’s plane was now flying in brilliant sunshine.

This time, as he flew over the Drem airfield, it looked completely different. The hangars looked like new.

There were four airplanes on the ground: three were familiar biplanes, but painted in an unfamiliar yellow; the fourth was a monoplane, which the RAF had none of in 1935.

The mechanics were dressed in blue overalls, which Goddard thought odd since all RAF mechanics dressed in brown overalls.

Strange, too, that none of the mechanics seemed to notice him fly over.

Leaving the area, he again encountered the storm, but managed to make his way back to Andover.

It wasn’t until 1939 that that the RAF began to paint their planes yellow, enlisted a monoplane of the type that Goddard saw, and the mechanics uniforms were switched to blue.

Had Goddard somehow flown four years into the future, then returned to his own time?

CAUGHT IN A TEMPORAL VORTEX

Dr. Raul Rios Centeno, a medical doctor and an investigator of the paranormal, recounted to author Scott Corrales a story told to him by one of his patients, a 30-year-old woman, who came to him with a serious case of hemiplegia – the total paralysis of one side of her body.

“I was at a campground in the vicinity of Markahuasi,” she told him.

Markahuasi is the famous stone forest located about 35 miles east of Lima, Peru.

“I went out exploring late at night with some friends. Oddly enough, we heard the strains of music and noticed a small torch-lit stone cabin. I was able to see people dancing inside, but upon getting closer I felt a sudden sensation of cold which I paid little attention to, and I stuck my head through an open door. It was then that I saw the occupants were clad in 17th century fashion. I tried to enter the room, but one of my girlfriends pulled me out.”

It was at that moment that half of the woman’s body became paralyzed.

Was it because the woman’s friend pulled her out of the stone cabin when she was half entered into it?

Was half her body caught in some temporal vortex or dimensional doorway?

Dr. Centeno reported that “an EEG was able to show that the left hemisphere of the brain did not show signs of normal functioning, as well as an abnormal amount of electric waves.” (See Dimensions Beyond Our Own for more details on this story.)

READ THE REST OF THE STORY HERE….

See More About:

Suggested Reading :

END

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

REAL NEWS June 29, 2012

Posted by Xaniel777 on June 28, 2012

TODAY’S NEWS : June 29, 2012

===========================================================================

Here’s a statement I found at Mike Rivero’s ‘ What Really Happened.com ‘, that Americans should read and remember who we are :

“Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom.

Congress have no power to disarm the militia.

Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…

[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments,

but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” –

– Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.

=========================================================================================

 

Rubio: IRS to ‘come after’ uninsured Americans

{ XANIEL’S NOTE : This is just what Romney needed to take the election away from Obama.

We are enough trouble with this current President, but if , ‘ Romney gets elected, GOD HELP US ALL !!’

What really surprises me, is Obama actully thinks he did something great and won something here.

Instead he has pushed this Country closer to ‘ The Second American Relvoution. ‘

The First Black President in the History of the United States, will no doubt be the last President of the United States!

From this point on, you can except the States ( over short time of each other) to start Seceding from the rest of the Nation.

My best guess is, that this once great Nation will split itself into 5 (five) to 7 (seven) New Republics,

with NO U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT attached to any of them.

‘ Rest in Peace U.S.A. ‘ 

Let’s all thank ‘ Barry ‘ people!

May History spit upon you Barry ( the Obama ) Soetoro }~~Xaniel777

========================================================================

From POLITICO

By MJ LEE | 6/28/12

Sen. Marco Rubio said Thursday that the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold President Barack Obama’s health care law means that the IRS will now “come after” Americans.

“I hope people back home fully understand what this means, and here’s what this means: It is now unlawful for you not to buy health insurance, and if you do not buy it, you have an IRS problem,” the Florida Republican said on Fox News.

“If you do not buy health insurance, the IRS is going to be on your back and chasing you. They’re going to take away your refund, they’re going to increase your fees, they’re going to come after you.”

Rubio argued that millions of Americans will face being “out of compliance” with the IRS for not having health insurance coverage.

“Somehow the Obama administration thinks that’s a victory,” he said. “That’s everything you need to know about that administration.”

The high court ruled Thursday that Congress did not overstep its power by requiring almost all Americans to buy health insurance.

The justices ruled that Congress has the authority to impose the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate through its taxing power.

In his interview on Fox News, Rubio said he wants Democrats and Republicans to agree on a need to “start from scratch.”

“I hope that even the Democrats in the Senate will realize — I hope this is not what they intended, and will repeal this thing and let’s start from scratch, replacing it with some common sense approaches that somehow doesn’t put all of these millions of Americans at odds and at war with the IRS,” he said.

(See also: Full coverage of the health care reform decision)

Rubio, a first-term senator who won his seat in 2010, said the high court’s decision has put the politics surrounding health care “back where we were when I ran for office.”

“One of the central issues of the campaign was this real anger at the overreach of the Obama administration on this health care law,” he said. “I think this now becomes a central issue again.”

He added, “This is one more piece of evidence that the Obama administration is hurting economic growth in America.”

Rubio appeared on CNN shortly after and repeated that the decision could give Americans “an IRS problem.”

“It is a loss for America. Let me begin by reminding everybody what the Supreme Court decides is they decide whether something is a constitutional or not constitutional. They don’t decide whether this is a good idea. And it’s specific, and when they found that it was constitutional what they said was the reason why it’s constitutional is because it is a tax increase. Millions of Americans may now have an IRS problem as a result of the ruling,” he told CNN’s Candy Crowley.

“This is now turning the IRS into an enforcement mechanism for Obamacare,” he added.

Rubio also said he was not concerned about the political ramifications of the court’s decision for Mitt Romney.

“Let me first mention that when Governor Romney was the governor of a state, that is the state policy. If you don’t like the policies of the state, you can easily go to another state, and the state, by the way, does not have the IRS,” he said.

(Also on POLITICO: Kennedy slams ‘vast judicial overreaching’)

END

 

 

 

 

 Cantor: House will vote on repeal on health care law on July 11

 

From POLITICO

 By SEUNG MIN KIM | 6/28/12

LINK TO VIDEO HERE 

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said Thursday that the Republican-led House will vote on repealing the health care law soon after the July 4 recess.

Cantor, who sets the floor schedule in the House, said in a statement that the House will vote on the repeal the week of July 9 – which Cantor said will clear the path for “patient-centered reforms that lower costs and increase choice.”

(PHOTOS: 21 landmark SCOTUS rulings)

“The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold ObamaCare is a crushing blow to patients throughout the country,” Cantor said. “ObamaCare has failed to keep the President’s basic promise of allowing those who like their health care to keep it, while increasing costs and reducing access to quality care for patients.”

UPDATE: Cantor said in a follow-up Tweet that the vote will be July 11.

 END

 

 

 

 

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY – Dr Robert Gallo

 

Uploaded by  on Dec 2, 2011

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY – Dr Robert Gallo

Courtesy: Dr Leonard Horovitz [in the interests of extending Human Educational knowledge].

AIDS was deliberately created to deliberately depopulation development of humanity – created at Fort Dietrick through US Bioweapons development.

END

 

 

 

 

US Supreme Court Rules against We the People

 

From the Trenches

Posted on June 27, 2012 by Henry Shivley


One of the consolations being offered to the Ron Paul supporters by the Campaign for Liberty is the assertion that, though we may not succeed in getting the GOP ticket for Dr. Paul, we will make “great inroads” in electing patriotic local representatives, who in accordance with the theory, will pass local legislation designed to protect our Constitution and our rights.

On Monday, the so called Supreme Court of the United States destroyed all illusions of correcting the problems within our nation from the bottom up, as key portions of Arizona’s immigration law was struck down by the treasonous insurgent soviet socialists sitting on the Supreme Court.

The one provision that was upheld is effectively nullified simply through Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s refusal to enforce our federal immigration laws. 

The fact is the manner in which the treasonous court ruled will only encourage further invasion from the south.

Though the police in Arizona can, via reasonable suspicion, check the legal status of anyone they pull over for another offence, it is being reported that ICE will simply delay the transfer of information at the traffic stop to the point that the illegals will have to be let go.

Even if they are arrested they must be turned over to ICE who will let them go. 

 And if they are not let go, of course with the aid of the treasonous bastards that are supposed to be bringing them to justice, they will be, not only allowed, but encouraged, to sue the state for violation of their rights, making it absolutely clear that the perceived right of foreign nationals in our country illegally not to be detained outweighs the US nationals right to have a free and sovereign country and a constitutional Republic of, for, and by we the people.

This latest outrage is just another among a tidal wave of injustices being heaped upon us and any assertion that we the people can regain control of our country through anything short of a full blown revolution is a fantasy. 

We the people need to stop grasping for straws as we are being put to our knees. 

We need to stand up and assert our lawful authority to remove the treasonous insurgents within our government.

The only question left is how bad we are going to allow this thing to get before we act.

God bless the Republic, death to the international corporate mafia, we shall prevail.

END

 

 

 

 

Celente Launches 2nd American Revolution:

 Puts His Money Where His Heart Is

From LewRockwell

Trends Journal

June 26, 2012

KINGSTON, NY, 26 June 2012 – Gerald Celente’s forecast is clear – The 2nd American Revolution is on the horizon.

And this American Patriot has done more than just sign up to join the fight, he’s established its headquarters.

Inspired by its potent symbolic value, Celente has purchased the 1750s ,Franz Roggen House  a stately stone colonial set on the northeast corner of John and Crown Streets, in Kingston’s historic Stockade District.

This is the only intersection in the United States that boasts pre-revolutionary stone buildings on all four corners.

“Kingston played a critical role in the 1st American Revolution and was, for a short while, the capitol of New York State,” observes Celente. “Here is where I’m taking my stand to start the 2nd American Revolution.”

“The 1st American Revolution was fought with armies and bullets,” says Celente. “The 2nd American Revolution will not cost lives and limbs; it will be fought with mind and spirit.”

Celente is unequivocal: “America’s democratic political system is degenerate, corrupt and ineffective. It cannot be patched up or papered over.

Rather, it must be renewed, revived, and reconfigured from the ground up,” he says. “The potential for positive and sweeping change is there. It can happen, but it has to be made to happen.”

How? First, “We the people” must be made aware of the urgent need for real change.

Then “we” must learn to accept and embrace the concept of a full-scale intellectual revolution.

“The time is ripe, Americans are ‘mad as hell and not going to take it anymore,’” says Celente, who predicts that the November election will be the turning point. “The polls prove it. There is little enthusiasm for either candidate and, once again, Americans will be left with no choice other than the choice of the lesser of two evils.”

“Stay Home, Don’t Vote!”

Celente’s Revolutionary call to arms begins with a voter’s strike. “Stay Home, Don’t Vote” is his campaign slogan. “People have been conned into believing that if you don’t vote you’ve lost the right to complain. That’s political baloney,” fumes Celente. “The true case is exactly the opposite.

This is a two-headed, one party system. Republican or Democrat, considering their track records, it’s clear nothing can be expected from either Presidential candidate other than the perpetuation of the destructive and criminal policies that have brought America to its current state of perpetual crisis and socioeconomic decline. Ditto for Congress.”

“What self-respecting person would cast a vote for a lesser of two evils?” asks Celente. “Not only is it immoral and undignified, it’s destructive. Lesser or greater, evil is evil.

By supporting one evil or the other, the voter becomes an accessory to the crime. Only a true intellectual revolution can restore dignity, trust, morality, decency and compassion.”

“Anything else is just more of the same. Stay Home, Don’t Vote!”

As far as Celente is concerned, “We can change course, restore our country and regain our independence. United, the American people have the power to prevail and create a more ‘perfect Union.’”

======================================

Copyright © 2012 Gerald Celente

Gerald Celente is founder and director of The Trends Research Institute, author of  Trends 2000 and  Trend Tracking (Warner Books), and publisher of The Trends Journal. He has been forecasting trends since 1980, and recently called “The Collapse of ’09.”


END

 

 

 

 

10 Disturbing SHTF Threats that most Preppers Haven’t Prepared For

 

Off Grid Survival

From OFF GRID SURVIVAL

June 22, 2012

When planning for a SHTF scenario, there’s really only one thing that we can be sure of;  Survival will be a bigger challenge than you ever believed possible.

While you can defiantly take measures to prepare yourself for what’s to come, when you’re talking about a SHTF scenario, all bets are really off.

Here are 10 things that you may have never considered when planning for a SHTF survival situation.

Law Enforcement Issues

1. No Law Enforcement

military troops

During an extreme SHTF scenario, it is very likely that law enforcement and emergency responders will be nonexistent.

Even during small scale disasters, law enforcement officers often leave to take care of their own families first.

When things go bad (empty grocery stores, no utilities, mass riots, violence, etc.) you are more than likely going to have to defend yourself.

2. Fake Law Enforcement

In a SHTF Scenario you need to be on the lookout for everything including people impersonating law enforcement and military personnel.

During a catastrophic event, you will most likely see criminals preying on the innocent by pretending to be either police or military officers.

You have to be able to quickly determine who is who, or stay away from people at all costs.

3. Law Enforcement and the Military Will Try to Take Your Guns.

Think it can’t happen? It already has!

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans Police Superintendent Eddie Compass ordered all local law enforcement, including the U.S. Marshalls office and the National Guard, to seize all civilian firearms.

Without warrants, armed National Guard troops and New Orleans law enforcement officials forcibly confiscated over 1,000 legal firearms from law abiding citizens.

The New Orleans gun confiscation should serve as a warning to how the government and law enforcement officials will react during a large scale national disaster.

 It is extremely likely that they will come for your guns!

Personal Safety Issues

4. Gangs & Raiders

Prepper Image

If things go bad, there will likely be more people who mean to do you harm than there will be people who are prepared.

This is something that you must accept and learn to deal with. 

The fact is, most people have no idea what it really takes to survive and once their safety net is removed they will become increasingly desperate and unpredictable.

Let’s face it, even during the good times there’s a certain segment of our population that’s just downright insane.

From the idiots who go nuts and riot after their team loses a game, to the violent criminals and gangs who are already terrorizing big cities throughout America, there’s little doubt that a total collapse would make urban living almost impossible.

5. You need to be able to Defend Yourself.

During an extreme emergency situation the lunatics of the world are going to be roaming the streets looking for easy victims to target. 

If you’re serious about survival, you need to train yourself in multiple self-defense styles and techniques.

This means arming yourself with not only weapons, but also with the knowledge of how to defend yourself without them.

Sanitation Issues

Sanitation

6. Garbage will become a Killer.

This is a topic that’s not often discussed, but it’s one that will probably become a real problem during a SHTF situation.

Often, people who talk about urban survival worry about things like raiders and roaming gangs, but the real danger might actually come from something that you already have in your home  –Garbage

7. You have to Stock up on Sanitation Items

When planning to survive in any long-term survival situation, one thing that’s often overlooked is the dangers associated with a lack of adequate sanitation.

I know it’s not a pleasant thing to think about, but this one issue has the potential to kill more people than any other survival topic that we can talk about.

Mental & Physical Health Issues

8. Maintaining a Positive Mental Attitude during a Survival Situation

The ability to maintain a positive mental attitude during a survival situation is something that needs to be taking seriously.

It’s also something that you need to start working on now, before the SHTF.

Making it through a survival scenario often comes down to how well you can control your emotions.

Keeping a positive frame of mind, even in the face of an unthinkable threat, will help you process what’s happening and will help you respond to the situation without giving into fear.

9. You must be prepared to face a number of physical and mental challenges.

From dealing with a lack of sleep and inadequate hydration, to coping with hunger pains and other stressors, survival can take a huge toll on your body.

One of the best things you can do to ensure your survival, in just about any situation, is to make sure your body and your mind are trained to survive. This means motivating yourself to get off your butt and get in shape now, before it’s to late.

Communication Issues

10. You will be cut off from the outside World.

Teotwawki

In a survival situation, knowledge is going to be a critical factor in determining the ultimate outcome of your situation.

The ability to be able to predict what will happen in a survival situation is an important part of being prepared and often comes down to your ability to send and receive information.

When the power lines go down and the radio stations stop transmitting, there’s one line of communication that will still be alive and well.

 Having a good Multiband Ham Radio will allow you to send and receive critical emergency information during a disaster.

It’s also a great way to find alternative news sources from around the world.

END

 

 

 

 

1961 – A Jewish Defector Warns America!!!

 

From the Trenches

Posted on June 27, 2012 by David2


The Vatic Project  Vatic Note:  I cannot believe the hidden history that I am falling onto by accident.

 This is another major big eye opener.  

I want to thank the pragmatic Witness for finding this and publishing it.  

This is what happens when you  go down rabbit holes looking for something else…. and history jumps up and kicks you in the toosh.  

This great Jewish man, through an attack of conscience and his love for his adopted country, The United States of America,  came clean in 1961 in a spontaneous speech he gave  and its revealing.

What courage and integrity he had.  Something that has been disappearing here,  like real clouds.

He literally tells us these so called “Jews” are really Khazars but he uses the term Jews because that is what every one else calls them.  

Now this is in 1961.  Unbelievable.

If I had tried to post this  10 years ago, no one would have listened, but today its our new reality.  

He warned us and told us clearly what, how and how long this had been going on.  

We did not listened, and I probably would have been banned like I was for saying Goldman sachs was the culprit we needed to focus on, and that is why we started the blog, to stop the censorship and banning we were getting.

 Anyway, read this eye opening speech.  

It is a necessary knowledge that we need to deal with oursituation and how to overcome it.  

We are clearly running out of time.  

Soldiers patrolling American city streets in Missouri.

A Jewish Defector Warns America

 by Pragmatic Witness,  

 A Speech given By Benjamin H. Freedman in 1961 

Publishers (Prag Witness) Introductory Note: Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. 

He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. 

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation.

Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. 

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.

Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman’s essential message to us — his warning to the West — is more urgent than ever before. — K.A.S.

FREEDMAN’S SPEECH :

HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. (VN:  Because this was given back in 1961, it was not known yet or not shown the satanism that was prevalent within the khazar Zionists agenda and behind the scenes as we saw with the ancient bloodlines that we covered on here this past 2 weeks.

 So keep that in mind when you read about “Co-religionists, since they are not religious as we know it.)

For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country.

Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914.

There are few people here my age who remember that.

Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually.

The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean.

Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week’s food supply — and after that, starvation.

At that time, the French army had mutinied.

They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme.

The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn’t want to play war anymore, they didn’t like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany.

And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms.

They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis.

That means: “Let’s call the war off, and let room.

There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war.

We were railroaded into — if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into — that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine.

That is something that the people of the United States have never been told.

They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let’s have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.”

They didn’t know whether the war would last another year or another ten years.

So they started to work out a receipt.

The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn’t know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain’s promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war.

So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill.

I don’t think I could make it more emphatic than that. (VN: Britain needed the US to come into the war because they were losing it.  But the bankers, Rothschild, was winning once the US came into the war.)

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany.

You know what happened.

When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. 

I was there: I ought to know.

Now what happened?

The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, “How about Palestine for us?”

And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration.

So the Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh, so that was the game!
That’s why the United States came into the war.”

The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

 (VN: That was the first time they found out that it was all a conspiracy to stop Germany’s economic growth, that both Britain and the US, wanted to stop, especially Britain and the Zionists wanted their Palestine and we published how Rothschild had spent 220,000 dollars in those days for Palestinian land.

 Then not too long ago we published another blog about the same situation arising after Hitler came into power and Germany was growing economically, which the British seemed to hate.  

Churchill quotes were included in the blog confirming their desire to put Germany down again for the same reason)

That brings us to another very interesting point.

When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it.

Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany.

You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry andfinance as is Bernard Baruch in this country.

You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd’s and the Hamburg-American Lines.

You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family.

You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers — the biggest in the world.

The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that.

The Germans felt: “Well, that was quite a sellout.”

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union.

And we were winning.

And we told the Soviet Union: “Well, let’s quit. We offer you peace terms. Let’s forget the whole thing.”

And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union.

And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat.

A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man’s imagination cannot encompass.

Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us.

How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese?

I don’t think that one of them would dare show his face on any street.

There wouldn’t be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that’s how the Germans felt towards these Jews.

They’d been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany.

And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely.

And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers —

and the press was filled with their statements —

that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war.

The Jews themselves admitted that.

It wasn’t that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer.

There was no religious feeling.

There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief.

It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious.

Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said “Shema’ Yisroel” or “Our Father.”

Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States.

Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible.

They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy.

They built up world trade.

You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth.

Three hundred separate little political entities.

And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state.

And within 50 years they became one of the world’s great powers.

Their navy was rivalling Great Britain’s, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products.

What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany.

There isn’t one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it.

But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed.

Not a single hair.

Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.

They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists.

Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time.

And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days.  

Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days.

In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar.

So he fled to Holland for safety, for security.

After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone’s head.

They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor.

They didn’t fight one another with pistols.

Well, that’s the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany.

And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews.

About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews.

And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact.

They didn’t want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

 The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews.

They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could.

They shunned them.

The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam.

Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933.

And they said to Germany: “You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can’t treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you.”

You can imagine what the Germans told them.

So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said,

“The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business.”

And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany’s food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported.

So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany’s population would have to starve.

There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population.

Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that “this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration,”

which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time.

Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn’t find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words “made in Germany” on it.

In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked “made in Germany,”

they were picketed with signs saying “Hitler,” “murderer,” and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.

At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked “made in Germany.”

Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I’ve been observing women’s legs for many years and it’s been a long time since I’ve seen any cotton stockings on them.

I saw Macy’s boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying “murderers,” “Hitlerites,” and so forth.

Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany.

There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, “Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?” They naturally resented it.

Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews.

Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be?

Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn’t until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany.

And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don’t like to use the word “anti-Semitism” because it’s meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I’ll have to use it.

The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott.

Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive.

In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between.

And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible.

And they started to re-arm.

In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union.

The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that “Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong.”

The same as we in this country are saying today, “Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong.”

Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense.

Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination.

I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT.

Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed.

Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now?

If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished.

Why might such a war take place? 

It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. 

The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government.

That is just as true as I am standing here.

Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son’s.

Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don’t know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe.

Did you know it at that time?

Not a person in the United States knew it.

You weren’t permitted to know it.

Who knew it?

President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it?

I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there.

I was “confidential man” to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer.

So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson’s brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.

Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand.

President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby.

That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept.

They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered.

For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their “commonwealth.”

They’ve fooled you so much that you don’t know whether you’re coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, “Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony.”

I don’t know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury.

If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don’t call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.)

The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world’s population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars.

They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia.

And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe.

They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries.

The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe — so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers.

That’s how big and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now.

But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world.

The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith — either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism.

By spinning a top, and calling out “eeny, meeny, miney, moe,” he picked out so-called Judaism.

And that became the state religion.

He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews.

There wasn’t one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land.  

(VN:  actually as we proved on here through subsequent research, that they picked Judaism because they were forced to choose by the west and by the east who were invading them for their lack of moral ethics in business, funny how somethings never change. Remember they controlled the silk road between east and west) 

Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time.

Not one of them!

And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, “You want to help repatriate God’s Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don’t you?

It’s your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior.

You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we’re Jews.”

But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted.

It is as ridiculous to call them “people of the Holy Land,” as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems “Arabs.”

Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief.

Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed’s birthplace.

Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves “Arabs.”

You would say they were lunatics.

Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy.

All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia.

The same as the Irish.

When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants.

They hadn’t become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe.

Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter.

Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain.

So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. 

Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, “We’re going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God’s Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land.”

Could there be a bigger lie than that?

Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie.

You’d believe black is white if you heard it often enough.

You wouldn’t call black black anymore — you’d start to call black white.

And nobody could blame you.

That is one of the great lies of history.

It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.

 Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them?

I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I’m not here to be a rabble-rouser. I’m here to give you facts.

When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite.

It is the only prayer for which you stand.

You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre.

In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void.

The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge.

They shall have no force or effect.

And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them.

How much can you depend on their loyalty?

You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.

 We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.

 

END

 

 

 

 

UK ready to take on Israel over fate of children clapped in irons

 

The Independent

From The Independent 

By Terri Judd – June 27, 2012

The Foreign Office revealed last night that it would be challenging the Israelis over their treatment of Palestinian children after a report by a delegation of senior British lawyers revealed unconscionable practices, such as hooding and the use of leg irons.

In the first investigation of its kind, a team of nine senior legal figures examined how Palestinians as young as 12 were treated when arrested.

Their shocking report Children in Military Custody details claims that youngsters are dragged from their beds in the middle of the night, have their wrists bound behind their backs, and are blindfolded and made to kneel or lie face down in military vehicles.

Children from the West Bank are held in conditions that could amount to torture, such as solitary confinement, with little or no access to their parents.

They can be forced to stay awake before being verbally as well as physically abused and coerced into signing confessions they cannot read.

The team – led by Sir Stephen Sedley, a former Court of Appeal judge – heard that “every Palestinian child is treated like a potential terrorist”.

In a damning conclusion, the report points out repeated breaches of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which prohibits cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

“We were sitting in court and saw a section of a preliminary hearing when a very young looking child, a boy, was brought in wearing a brown uniform with leg irons on. We were shocked by that. This was a situation where we had been invited into the military courts for briefings from senior judges,” explained one of the report’s authors, human rights barrister Greg Davies.

“To hold children routinely and for substantial periods in solitary confinement would, if it occurred, be capable of amounting to torture,” the report said.

Last night the Foreign Office, which backed the report, said it would be taking up the claims with the Israeli authorities:

“The UK government has had long-standing concerns about the treatment of Palestinian children in Israeli detention, and as a result decided to fund this independent report. While recognising that some positive recent steps have been made by the Israeli authorities, we share many of the report’s concerns, and will continue to lobby for further improvements.”

While the legal team said it was in no position to prove the truth of the claims of cruelty made repeatedly by Palestinian children, but denied by the Israeli authorities – which offered unprecedented access to the delegation – it pointed to the disparity in the law.

Israeli children must have access to a lawyer within 48 hours and cannot be imprisoned under the age of 14. But Palestinian children as young as 12 are jailed and can be kept for three months without legal representation.

Between 500 and 700 are jailed each year.

“The other shocking thing is they are incarcerated in breach of many conventions.

The practical effect is parents can’t get there because they can’t get permits,” said Marianna Hildyard QC.

While the investigating team welcomed improvements introduced by the Israeli authorities, both Palestinian and Israeli lawyers on the ground insisted much of it was “rhetoric ra ther than real change”.

Last night, Israeli Embassy spokesperson Amir Ofek said the country appreciated the efforts of the delegation but blamed Palestinians who “glorify terrorism”.

He said: “As a result [children] are frequently involved in lethal acts.

With the Palestinian Authority unable or unwilling to meet its obligation to investigate and prosecute these offences, Israel has no choice but to do so itself.

“Israel notes the detailed recommendations in the report and will study them closely as part of its ongoing efforts to find the most appropriate balance between preventing violence and treating perpetrators with humanity.”

The report details claims children are dragged from their beds, bound and blindfolded.

www.childreninmilitarycustody.org

To read the report click here

 ========================================================================

END

 

 

 

 

Another attack on the Second Amendment: UN Small Arms Treaty

 

From The PPJ Gazette

June 25, 2012 by ppjg

By Marti Oakley   

The United Nations, that bastion of self-enriching, bloated gas bags, will soon be holding a month long convention on the UN Small Arms TREATY between 192 nations.

Of course, Hillary Clinton is right in the middle of things in an effort to commit the US to this unconstitutional treaty.

Because this is a treaty, and not one of those federal corporate contract agreements the presidents are so fond of, it will have to be brought to the states for ratification (See U.S. Const. art. II, § . Section 3 provides the power to make treaties (with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate)) except I don’t believe that will ever happen. 

Some, never heard of before, political slight of hand will be given as the reason as to why ratification of the treaty by the states was by-passed.

Clinton will agree to the treaty on behalf of the US and Obama will sign it with great pleasure. 

For decades it has been the intent of the federal government to disarm lawful gun owners in the US.

Every possible excuse and reason has been used to try and sell the idea of striking down the 2nd Amendment by both partys. 

The actual intent is, by U.N. mandate to disarm private individual gun owners in America claiming a global treaty banning the ownership of small arms. 

Its all for world peace! 

It will make the military assaults on all nations far easier if the general population isn’t armed and able to mount even a limited defense.

Don’t look to the District of Criminals for help!

If you think other than a few Republicans and even fewer Democrats will half-heartedly object or stand to defend our constitution or our inalienable rights of any kind, much less the right to keep and bear arms, you are sadly mistaken. 

Both party’s have been equally active in their assaults on the constitution, with members of both partys actively promoting the militarization of local law enforcement against their respective communities. 

Our police and many sheriffs departments are now para-military organizations capable and willing to turn on their own communities in subservience to Homeland Security edicts and orders. 

Regarding this, the District of Criminals couldn’t be happier.

See: govtslaves.info

“This is the Treaty that will infringe on the US Constitution, the Second Amendment, and your right to self defense.

The United Nations and specially invited anti firearms rights groups who want to eliminate our firearms freedoms will be convening at the UN July 2nd through the 27th to draft a Treaty to accomplish the goal of regulating firearms and accessories, and ultimately the disarming all of America.”

Spain agreed with the drafters of the Treaty, with input from various international and US gun control groups, who want the “Urgent and essential” Treaty to;

“a) Include a golden rule that prohibits the authorization of arms transfers where there is a substantial risk that used to commit or facilitate the commission-¬ – serious violations of international human rights and international humanitarian law.

b) Allow a comprehensive coverage that includes controls on weapons, ammunition and related material and on ALL (emphasis added) transfers.

c) explicit regulation of solid systems of licensing, transparency and reporting.”

_______________________

We wouldn’t sell arms to the same countries we are fighting…would we?

Supposedly, this treaty will involve only the sale of small arms and military weapons to other countries. 

That’s never going to happen because the US has been selling arms to mid-eastern countrys for years on end, even as we waged wars on them.

What’s The Impact Of U.S. Arms Deals In The Middle East? (NPR Interveiw between Melissa Block and her guest William Hartung)

For the last three years we have sold military weapons valued at about $350 million to Bahrain with no questions asked, including helicopters, guns and ammunition.

The recent uprising in Egypt was accompanied by the use of teargas, the canisters stamped U.S.A.

Host Melissa Block speaks with arms export expert William Hartung.

He’s the director of the Arms and Security Initiative at the New America Foundation. 

From that interview:

Mr. HARTUNG: Well, I think on the low-end, the teargas probably caused the most uproar.

But over the years, a billion dollars or more every year, we were selling tanks, we were selling fighter planes, we were selling armored personnel carriers, things that were used sort of indirectly to close off the square, to buzz the demonstrators.

So, you know, not to the same degree of impact as the teargas, but certainly I think causing some ill feelings towards the United States for supporting the regime for so many years.

This interview only touched on a small number of ongoing arms deals which the US has engaged in for more than 30 years.

WE are the enemy our government fears

In preparation for the disarming of America, our law enforcement agencies now refer to the general public as [civilians]. 

That is a referenced military term. 

These same agencies now carry fully automatic rifles, and in some instance grenades. 

Cities are buying military tanks with ADS systems installed on them and many are buying drones to spy on their populations; drones which will be fully capable of being armed. 

Who is it they are preparing to wage war on?

And guess who it is that will show up at your door in full battle rattle to demand your guns? 

The UN?  Not hardly! 

Those who show up at your door (and they will show up) will be dressed in military gear meant for war.

  Since they will not be in Iraq or Afghanistan or any other country we are aggressively terrorizing……who is it they are preparing to wage war on

It appears this will be war on American soil with what used to be [American’s] dressed for war against the remaining American public. 

We are the enemy our government fears and we currently have the means to fight back against assaults by our own government.

There is not one of us who possesses the fire power or weaponry equivalent to what our own government is prepared to use against us to force us into submission. 

Still, this will not stop a great number of Americans from fighting back.

While this unconstitutional treaty is sold to the public, they will speak great volumes about how disarming everyone (except police, the military, special agents, special ops, FBI, CIA, NSA, and every other corporate federal agency) will help bring [peace] to the world, I don’t believe it will be quite that easy.

Peace will be the last thing the criminal gang on CRAPitol Hill will achieve here at home if they do not stand up to this assault on the 2nd Amendment.

END

 

 

 

 

Former Merck scientists file suit against Merck under False Claims Act

 

From NaturalNews

June 26, 2012 by: Rosemary Mathis, Vice President of Victim Support, SANE VAX, INC.

Merck

(NaturalNews) On April 27, 2012, a formal complaint was filed in the Eastern Pennsylvania Federal District Court accusing Merck of a longstanding scheme to mislead and defraud Government health authorities worldwide.

Two of Merck’s former employees have accused the pharmaceutical giant of marketing multivalent MMR vaccines under false pretenses. According to the complaint, these vaccines have been mislabeled, misbranded, adulterated and falsely certified as having a 95% efficacy rate.

Before the lawsuit was filed, 21 doctors 1 added their voices to other groups of doctors who are calling for MMR vaccines to be used as a regular booster every 4 – 8 years, in order to control mumps outbreaks.

These doctors all assume that the mumps component of all MMR vaccines have the 95 – 98% efficacy promised by Merck.

However, the court documents filed by two Merck virologists meticulously detail how Merck ostensibly manipulated test results for decades in order to create a false 95% efficacy rate for the mumps component of their multivalent MMR vaccines.

The former Merck virologists contend that the multivalent mumps component has a vastly reduced efficacy which is directly responsible for mumps outbreaks during the last decade which prompted international calls for MMR booster shots every 4 – 8 years.

Virologists Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski describe how Merck had to recertify the mumps component in 2000, in order to comply with regulatory requirements in order for the mumps component to be included in two new multivalent MMR vaccines.

The usual test, which had certified the mumps component’s efficacy in the 60’s, failed when used in 2000.

They claim the results were so low Merck decided to change its own test protocol by testing the vaccine against the weakened mumps vaccine virus instead of the wild (naturally circulating) mumps virus.

When that modification didn’t result in the desired 95% efficacy figure, Merck’s executive directors of vaccine research, Drs Alan Shaw and Emilio Emini, instructed Drs David Krah and Mary Yagodich to implement a vast array of modifications to testing procedures3, then, allegedly pressured both Krahling and Wlochowski to participate.

When these modifications also failed to demonstrate the desired 95% efficacy rate, it is alleged that Drs Shaw and Emini instructed Drs Krah and Yagovich to abandon “gold standard” testing, and implement a new procedure, supposedly with the agreement of FDA, which included adding animal antibodies to human blood samples taken both pre and post vaccination4.

By combining the very low levels of human antibodies with animal antibodies, a much higher total level of virus neutralization was obtained than could occur from human antibodies alone.

 The human antibody levels alone would never protect in the real world against wild mumps.

 But after adding animal antibodies, the human blood samples which had previously failed under the old “gold standard” testing were retested using the “enhanced” protocols and passed with flying colors.

New ‘enhanced’ tests showed 100% efficacy, not against wild mumps virus, but against the mumps vaccine virus.

However, combining the animal and human antibodies led to a new problem. In some of the tests more than 80% of pre-vaccine blood samples now showed up as immune.

Usually, the highest number of pre-vaccine immune results any scientist could expect is 10%.

Further manipulations of the animal antibody levels failed to bring the pre-vaccine blood test results down to the expected 10% levels.

According to the complaint, Merck then implemented additional ‘creative’ strategies to show a lack of seroconversion in immune samples in an attempt to reduce the pre-vax level to the expected 10% because had the FDA seen the high numbers of “immune” pre-vaccine samples they would have easily detected the fraudulent test procedures.

Krahling and Wlochowski worked with the same team conducting these tests, but were outraged at what they deemed to be gross scientific deception and fraudulent practices.

When Drs Krahling and Wlochowski attempted to stop what they saw as, “wholesale fabrication of test data to reach its preordained 95% efficacy threshold,” Merck allegedly made various attempts to prevent them, including threatening to jail Dr. Krahling should he inform the FDA.

Despite these efforts, Dr Krahling made numerous calls to FDA.

These calls remained unanswered until Dr. Krahling reported to the FDA that Dr. Krah had removed and/or destroyed Dr. Krahling’s evidence.

An FDA agent then came and interviewed Dr. Krah, who apparently told the agent whatever was necessary to allay their concerns. The agent made no attempt to interview any other personnel, check any facilities, laboratory notebooks, or samples to corroborate what had been reported to them.

The lawsuit claims that to this day, Merck has consistently misrepresented the potency by simply quoting the 40 year old data from the pre-MMR monovalent mumps vaccine, thereby misrepresenting the efficacy of four multivalent vaccines: MMR, MMRII, Europe’s MMRvaxpro, and ProQuad, which is MMR plus chickenpox.

According to the two whistleblowers, not only have all the multivalent MMR vaccines been sold under false pretenses, but, as a result of this LACK OF EFFICACY, there have been numerous mumps outbreaks worldwide prompting calls for regular MMR boosters throughout life.

These mumps outbreaks were predicted by Merck’s Dr Krah 6in 2001, yet Merck allegedly ‘willfully’ withheld this information from multiple governments while consistently claiming there was no need for a new mumps component.8 

The question is, “If the mumps component is actually 95% effective, as stated, would experts be calling for lifelong boosters every 4 – 8 years?”

Has Merck turned over a new leaf since the recent Vioxx Scandal?

Do they still put profit before people?

Read the complaint, follow the court case, examine the evidence, and decide for yourself.

References:
1. http://journals.cambridge.org

2. Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

3. See pgs 10 and 11 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

4. See page 12 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

5. See page 22 No. 64 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

6. See page27/d82; 28/85 and page 40 first two lines – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

7. See page 29/86 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

8. See page 29/87 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act – http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Merck-mumps-suit.pdf

By Hilary Butler, Contributing Author from New Zealand.

Please visit our site at http://sanevax.org/.

About the author:
THE SANE VAX MISSION is to promote Safe, Affordable, Necessary & Effective vaccines and vaccination practices through education and information. We believe in science-based medicine.

Our primary goal is to provide the information necessary for you to make informed decisions regarding your health and well-being.

We also provide referrals to helpful resources for those unfortunate enough to have experienced vaccine-related injuries. 

We are demanding the HPV vaccines be taken off the market until an independent study on their safety and efficacy has been conducted.

Until then, we are committing our efforts to an educational media campaign to alert the public about the dangers of the HPV vaccines. 

SANE Vax, Inc. is involved in the ground-breaking production of the One More Girl Documentary which will premier in 2012.

Please join our cause by contributing to this project by contacting Ryan Richardson, Producer at ryan@onemoregirlfilm.com.

For more information, please visit our site at http://sanevax.org/.

=================================================

Articles Related to This Article:

• Merck litigation strategy – destroy expert witnesses

• Leaked documents show Merck knew of Vioxx dangers, yet hid them for years

• Merck Caught in Massive Scientific Fraud as In-House Authors were Disguised as Independent Scientists (opinion)

• Former head of CDC lands lucrative job as president of Merck vaccine division (opinion)

• Merck caught in scandal to bury Vioxx heart attack risks, intimidate scientists and keep pushing dangerous drugs; Vioxx lawsuits now forming

• Merck employees had “hit list” of doctors they sought to “neutralize”, court documents reveal (opinion)

END

 

 

 

 

Fair Use Notice ):

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~~ Xaniel777

©2009/2010/2011/2012Danimartextras

Posted in Alternative News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

 
%d bloggers like this: