REAL NEWS Sept 25 2012
Posted by Xaniel777 on September 24, 2012
TODAY’S NEWS : September 25, 2012
” WAKING UP THE WORLD ONE DAY AT A TIME ! “
United States of America Corporation fiscal year ends this week; time to end the horror
September 24, 2012
The United States of America Corporation (as opposed to the Republic of the United States), based in the Vatican-like independent city state of Washington D.C., has its fiscal year end on September 30th.
This criminal corporation has been constantly at war over the past 60 years if not the past several hundred years.
It needs to be bankrupted once and for all and many of us are trying to do just this.
The 13 inbred families that own this corporation have been trying desperately to avoid bankruptcy by starting World War 3.
However, even though they retain a rump of brain-washed slaves in Europe and North America, they have lost their ability to fool the world’s governments, militaries and intelligence agencies.
Soon even the brain-dead TV slaves will awaken.
The recent troubles between China and Japan have provided us with a unique peek at how world elite power games work at the highest level.
China’s new leader, Xi Jinping, vanished from public view for a couple of weeks after making a speech at a top communist party academy. During that speech…
Become a member and continue reading at : Weekly Geopolitical News and Analys
Would you revolt if firearms would suddenly become illegal to own?
(ORIGINAL TITLE : Those Behind the U.N. Small Arms Treaty and Passage)
As I mentioned before, a New World Order brought into existence through fraud and deception can never allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, or freedom of inquiry, or its own crimes become exposed.
In order to conceal the circumstances of is own birth from its own citizens, the New World Order has to be history’s greatest tyranny.~~Rivero of WRH.com
From Keys To Liberty ~ American Ideals
Posted by dbhj – September 24, 2012
Amazing KeysToLiberty is not the only website that has caught on to the passage of the Small Arms Treaty, a little late, but onboard is The Independent Sentinel.
They appear to have the same conviction on an Executive Order, but quote an article from the National Rifle Association; a fox in the chicken house, as NRA is a United Nations NGO.
Media Matters (George Soros publication) is constantly attacking the NRA, for all the wrong reasons, see here, here and here.
Do a search on google for Media Matters and the NRA. Never much about other pro-gun groups, almost like they are helping to advertise for the NRA. (Do a search Media Matters and GOA)
Media Matters is helping to set the battle in the courts to “NRA (U.N. NGO member) vs. treaty”.
This is a well planned attack on the ‘right to keep and bear arms’ by the globalists.
KeysToLiberty is not the only website concerned with the American Rifle Association and its NGO status.
Another article that was sent in by a reader concerns the Real Danger of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty is in the Interpretation.
The article makes mention of Harold Hongju Koh.
Nice photo of an employee of the United Nations and the U.S. State Department under Hillary Clinton.
A legal advisor appointed on June 26, 2009 and still present.
Koh also served under President Clinton and Reagan.
Koh is almost a permanent bureaucrat around the White House, shifting from Department of Justice to Department of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.
Ever wonder why unemployment is so high?
Koh holds down 3 very high paying jobs, faculty at the United Nations, Dean at Yale Law School and at the Department of State as Legal Adviser.
Back to the ‘Real Danger’ , and yes Koh turned the Declaration of Independence on its head in this article authored by Koh.
He quotes a lot of early Supreme Court cases on admiralty law – piracy.
None of those cases deal with firearms rights and most of the cases were at a time when a vast majority of the world still had firearms.
Koh is trying to sponsor international law over our Constitution.
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court is restricted from making law, it merely interprets the Constitution as it was originally written, or has in the past.
To show how one-sided Koh’s argument is, here is a case from 1957:
“It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, let alone alien to our Constitutional history and tradition to construe Article VI (the Supremacy Clause) as permitting the United States to exercise power under an international agreement, without observing Constitutional prohibitions.
In effect such construction would permit amendment of that document in a manner not sanctioned by Article V.”
and again the same case:
“The prohibitions of the Constitution were designed to apply to all branches of the National Government, and they cannot be nullified by the Executive, or by the Executive and the Senate combined.”
These are quotes from – Reid v. Covert, (1957), 354 U.S. 1
It has been a long time since the Supreme Court issued the decision on Reid v. Covert, on a Treaty must comply with the Constitution.
All cases can be overturned, See Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1856, upholding slavery.
Guess who would represent the case now before the Supreme Court?
Why Harold Hongju Koh of course, or at least as an Amicus curiae (friend of the court).
Koh would already have a Supreme Court Justice on his side.
Ruth Bader Ginsberg who attacked our Constitutional government in Egypt.
“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012.”
Would you revolt if firearms would suddenly become illegal to own?
There is something you should know about in the U.N. Programme of Action.
‘Post conflict’ is brought up in the document several times.
Is it possible they want you to revolt, causing a new civil war in hopes of losing your ‘right to keep and bear arms’ for ever?
If that is the case; and it appears likely, then Americans are forced to win at all costs to prevent the government, through the U.N. from permanently disarming the American people.
It has always been the globalists wet-dream to disarm world entirely, particularly America; as we are the last bastian of freedom left.
Their New World Order will be totalitarian to the extreme.
Life under such a global government would be unbearable for the average American.
Think hard, and plan well, and quit spending your hard earned money for donations to NRA so they can lose the coming battle.
Use that same hard earned money to prepare for the coming battle for freedom.
Remember the globalists are directing this court battle, setting things in motion.
They know the NRA will compromise, yet again.
The US is the World’s Biggest War-Monger
Sun, 09/23/2012 – 10:15 — Anonymous
by: Dave Lindorff
There is a massive deception campaign in the US, and in its global propaganda, which seeks to portray the United States as a poor set-upon nation that would like world peace but just has to keep a military stationed around the globe to “police” all the world’s “trouble spots.”
In fact, nothing could be further from the truth.
That truth is that the US is the biggest war-monger the world has ever known.
Defending US empire around the globe at a cost of $1.3 trillion a year
Let’s start with its budget
According to research by the War Resisters League, the US, in fiscal year 2012, budgeted a total of $673 billion for the military, plus another $166 billion for military activities of other government departments,
such as the nuclear weapons program, much of which is handled by the Department of Energy, or the Veterans Program, which pays for the care and benefits of former military personnel.
There’s also another roughly $440 billion in interest paid on the debt from prior wars and military expenditures.
All together, that comes to $1.3 trillion, which represents close to 50% of the general budget of the United States —
the highest percentage of a government budget devoted to the military of any modern nation in the world — and perhaps of any government of any nation in the world.
That spending represents also the world’s biggest percentage of national gross domestic product devoted to the military (GDP is a measure of all economic activity in a nation).
Looking at the other countries with big militaries — China, Russia, Britain and France — not only does not one come even close in terms of the percent of GDP spent on its military,
but taken together, all of their expenditures on their military combined total less than half what the US spends by itself.
Since the late 1960s, the US government has engaged in a sleight-of-hand to hide the scale of its military spending from the American people.
It has done this by adding to the federal budget the amount of money spent on Social Security, the nation’s retirement program, and Medicare, the health insurance program for the elderly and disabled.
This is not a correct accounting however, because both of those programs are actually funded by a separate payroll tax paid by employees and employers,
and the resulting trust funds are actually dedicated to the citizens who receive or will receive benefits from the programs.
Using that fraud, the government and the politicians are able to claim that the US “only” spends 24% of the budget on military.
Even that would be far above what is spent by any other nation in the world, but it is actually only half of what the US really spends as a share of its general budget.
One reason the US military budget is so huge is that the US operates some 900 bases abroad, in what amounts to a program of global empire.
The organization Foreign Policy in Focus has estimated that the cost of keeping those bases operating is about $250 billion.
Empire costs a lot more than that though.
There’s also the cost of operating a global fleet of ships, including incredibly costly aircraft carrier battle groups.
That cost, surely in excess of $100 billion when the cost of the ships is factored in, doesn’t get broken out by the Pentagon.
Then, there is another way the US is the world’s biggest war-monger.
This is in its role as the world’s biggest arms merchant.
In 2011, according to reports, the US sold more than $66 billion in arms to the rest of the world, often, as in the case of India and Pakistan, or India and China,
or Israel and Egypt and Saudi Arabia, selling weapons to countries that are mutually hostile to each other or even, as in the case of India and Pakistan, in a state of active conflict along their border.
That $66 billion — an all-time record for the US — was an astonishing and depressing 78 percent of the global arms market for the year.
Russia was the second biggest arms dealer, selling only a paltry $4.8 billion in weapons to the rest of the world.
None of these weapons the US is selling makes either the US or the world any safer.
Indeed, two of the biggest recipients of US military “aid” and weapons sales are Saudi Arabia and Israel.
The Saudi regime last year purchased $30 billion in arms from the US that year.
Meanwhile the US has been providing Israel with $3 billion in outright military aid each year for years.
Israel also buys billions of dollars in weapons from the US each year.
Saudi Arabia is a dictatorship and a promoter of instability within Syria, while it also props up dictatorships in countries like Yemen and Bahrain.
In other countries, like Israel or Colombia, US aid encourages military actions which could lead to conflicts that would inevitably draw the US in as a participant.
The truth is that none of America’s military spending makes the US safer. While GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, caught in some bizarre time warp, may think Russia is America’s “biggest enemy,”
the reality is that there is no nation on earth that poses any military threat to the US itself, and to the extent that terrorism might constitute a threat of some kind,
America’s trillion-dollar military is virtually useless against such small scale secret actions, which call for a police response, not a carrier battle group or a nuke.
There’s a good reason one doesn’t see fanatics traveling to Brazil or China or New Zealand to blow things up: Those countries aren’t stationing their troops within other countries’ borders, and aren’t selling weapons to countries that threaten their neighbors.
The US government tells Americans that all that money they are spending on the military is designed to “protect” them from harm.
In fact, the evidence over the years is that it is making Americans more vulnerable and less safe.
Not only that, but the wars that the US has started over the years — in Indochina, in Iraq, in Afghanistan and elsewhere —
have led to the deaths of tens of thousands of young Americans (and of course to the deaths of millions of people in those countries, most of them civilians).
History has shown that a country that spends half of every tax dollar collected from its citizens on its military cannot hope to prosper.
As President Dwight Eisenhower, a former top general in the US military who led US forces in World War II, once famously stated in a 1953 address to a group of newspaper editors:
“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.
This world in arms is not spending money alone.
It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.
The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities.
It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population.
It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement.
We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat.
We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.
This is, I repeat, the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking.
This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.”
Most of the rest of the world isn’t fooled by American government accounting tricks.
Being at the barrel end of the gun, people of other countries know how US military spending is a primary cause of war and terror in the world.
But we Americans ourselves need to wake up to the massive damage that our military-obsessed political system is doing to our country, lest it ultimately destroys us.
There is a clear reason that social programs in the US are threatened, that the economy is in a prolonged depression, that our education system is collapsing, and that our standing in the world has plummeted.
It is our militarism, and the incredible amount of the national wealth that is being spent on it.
This article first ran on the English-language website of PressTV.
UN General Assembly: Egypt hits Israel
“Washington should also live up to its own Camp David commitment to Palestinian self-rule.”
( UN 67th General Assembly )
From Roi Tov
Today, September 25, 2012, the General Debate of the 67th UN General Assembly will begin and last for a week.
Two planned speeches are of immense importance for the future of the Middle East.
The newly elected Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi, who is affiliated to the Muslim Brotherhood, and Palestine’s Mahmoud Abbas have already hinted at the controversial content of their speeches.
The aftermath may change forever Israel’s position in the area.
“Oom-Schmoom,” said Ben Gurion
Against all odds, UN in Hebrew is shortened as UM, and pronounced “oom,” resembling the English version.
This is random; the “U” stands for “nations,” while the “M” is a strengthened form of “unified,” literally and ironically meaning “made one.”
David Ben Gurion was Israel’s first Prime Minister and the person who had declared the state’s incomplete independence, following Resolution 181 of the UN General Assembly of November 29, 1947.
He often referred to the UN as “UM-Shmum,” (pronounced “oom-schmoom”) a term that translates into bad English as “UN-schmo***.”
Israelis have stayed on the same level of infantilism since those days.
They may feel better after publicly uttering the insulting words towards the organization to which they owe so much, but reality is clear: the UN is getting more and more relevant.
Last year, on September 23, 2011, an historic event took place at the 66th meeting of the UN General Assembly.
Mahmoud Abbas—speaking for the Palestinian people—asked the UN member states to accept Palestine as an equal member of this exclusive club.
Minutes later, Benjamin Netanyahu answered a rambling comment on the source of the Netanyahu name on behalf of the State of Israel, the UN-member oppressing the aspirant state.
The speeches and further comment can be found at Netanyahu is not a Netanyahu.
Soon afterwards, Israel blocked Palestine’s application at the UN Security Council, which must have approved the topic before it was brought to the General Assembly.
Yet, a few days later, on October 31, UNESCO granted Palestine full membership, with 107 votes in favor, 14 against and 52 abstentions.
Brazil, Russia, China, India, South Africa and France voted in favor, Israel, US, Canada and Germany opposed, while Britain oddly abstained (US Enters UN Alley).
The process became unstoppable.
On June 28, 2012, during its 36th Session in Saint Petersburg, Russia, the World Heritage Committee finally recognized the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem as a World Heritage Site.
No less important, it catalogued it under Palestine, which promised to speed up the reparations blocked by Israel since 1967.
Israel had successfully delayed Palestine at the General Assembly, but it failed in other bodies related to the UN. In his coldgrave, Ben Gurion probably has second thoughts about his violent, obscene style.
Mahmoud Abbas’ Strategy
A few days ago, I published a commentary on the Jewish New Year.
It was named Jewish New Year: We Are back in 1947!.
There was a good reason for the name; we are back at the partition days of 1947.
As a special gift to Israel, Palestine announced during the Jewish holidays that it is considering giving a dissolution letter to Israel, ending the Palestinian Authority.
Last February, the topic had been commented on by members of Mahmoud Abbas’ office.
This time the threat was uttered by the Secretary General of the PLO’s Executive Committee Yasser Abed Rabbo to the London-based Arab newspaper Al-Sharq Al-Awsat on September 18.
This is the logical result of the stagnation in the negotiations between Israel and Palestine, and the ongoing enlargement of the illegitimate Jewish settlements in the West Bank.
This is a smart move by Palestine.
It is not directly related to the UN since such a letter must be handed directly to Israel, after all the Palestinian Authority is a formal part of the State of Israel.
However, it is sending a very clear message to the UN, which would be requested by Palestine to upgrade its status to the one of observer at the UN, the same status held by the Holy See, Vatican City.
This will upgrade Palestine’s status from Occupied Territory to Occupied Country, opening new options for a legal battle against the Israeli occupation.
The unambiguous message of Abbas to the UN is: “recognize Palestine as an observer, or after the end of the Assembly, I will dismantle the Palestinian Authority.”
Even more dramatic is the standing of Egypt, which may turn out being Palestine’s savior.
Egypt’s new president turned out to be an impressive and surprising leader.
Barely known before the elections, he assumed power as little more than a civilian leader subjugated to the military junta that replaced CIA-backed Mubarak.
Last month, he surprised everybody by taking back full executive authority from the generals.
“This is the will of the Egyptian people through the elected president,” he explained in a recent interview.
Considering this, all his other declarations must be taken seriously. He defeated his main enemy, everything else should be easier.
An open question is his exact position with regard to the Peace Agreement between Egypt and Israel.
After all, the Muslim Brotherhood—to which Mr. Morsi is affiliated—demands a referendum on it.
The agreement won’t survive such an event. Until now, he had made pacifying statements towards Israel, but he was fast to push the army into Sinai (Securing Sinai: Egypt Retakes Sovereignty).
This event is forbidden by the peace agreement between the countries, but it was done with the explicit acceptance of the Israeli government.
The next target of Mr. Morsi seems to be Israel.
He will attend the UN General Debate and has already made intriguing declarations of what he expects from the USA and Israel.
In an interview to the New York Times, which preceded his UN speech, he said “If Washington is asking Egypt to honor its treaty with Israel, he said, Washington should also live up to its own Camp David commitment to Palestinian self-rule.”
In other words, he politely accused Israel of not honoring the peace agreement.
Under such circumstances, Egypt cannot be expected to observe it.
“Fulfill the agreement, or we’ll find a different path,” was the not so subtle message given to America and Israel.
More impressive is the fact that Morsi is not asking for goods for Egypt, but for Palestine.
He demands that the Palestinian-related parts of the agreement be respected by Israel; this includes the freezing of West Bank settlements as a first step.
Egypt currently leads the Non-Aligned Movement, the largest group of countries in the UN.
It is safe to assume that Mr. Morsi will be able to gather momentum in favor of Palestine.
“Oom schmoom,” said David Ben Gurion; yet, Israel is about to learn a very important lesson in diplomacy.
Israel is failing to stop Palestine.
Egypt, a much larger and important country than Israel, is actively supporting Palestine.
Wild winds of change are freezing up Ben Gurion’s tomb; meanwhile, Netanyahu keeps rambling about the origins of his name.
AIPAC-Drafted US Aid to Israel Illegal
Israel’s nuclear weapons render it ineligible for US aid
by Grant Smith, September 24, 2012
The Israel lobby’s biggest and longest-running Washington boondoggles are the massive annual weapons and economic packages to Israel.
Tightly coordinated campaign contributors (both individuals and political action committees) and the Israeli government’s own quiet demands manifest themselves within AIPAC-drafted foreign aid legislation.
The U.S.-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 forces Americans to fork hard-earned tax dollars over to Israel’s coffers on the pretext that it is in eminent danger.
Yet declassified documents reveal that even the current prime minister once worked inside the state’s clandestine nuclear arms smuggling rings.
Transferring foreign aid to the Middle East’s sole nuclear weapons state — which can obviously take care of itself — is not just unseemly and unnecessary. It is illegal.
AIPAC’s publicly available tax return [.pdf] reveals it has now become as seamlessly linked to its foreign principal as its parent organization — the American Zionist Council — was when it was finally ordered by the Kennedy administration to openly register as an Israeli foreign agent in 1962.
AIPAC spent $1,541,572 maintaining its Jerusalem office.
The office, led by Wendy Senor Singer, is described as the official location for daily meetings with senior Israeli government officials.
It is also used to coordinate the visits of supplicant U.S. politicians with funding from a mysterious captive charity of no employees claiming to be an educational organization [.pdf].
The Israeli government’s desires are seamlessly transcribed into legislation at AIPAC’s headquarters in Washington — raising the perennial question why AIPAC is not registering as Israel’s foreign agent.
In relation to the sheer volume of American taxpayer dollars it transfers to Israel, on paper AIPAC is a rather thinly-funded and top-heavy organization.
In its latest schedule of contributors, filed in late April and just obtained by special request from the IRS, AIPAC reported that only 1,949 individual contributors provided 61% of its $64 million in total contributions and grants.*
The top-tier donors each gave on average $20,206, with the top donor chipping in an impressive $6,610,181.
Although contributions to 501(c)(4) organizations like AIPAC are not tax-deductible, corporations and partnerships can write off contributions as a business expense.
One AIPAC donor, an attorney in New York City whose confidential data the IRS didn’t successfully scrub, presumably paid AIPAC with funds from his law partnership, which AIPAC listed as the contributor’s address.
AIPAC claims in mandatory disclosures filed with the clerk of the House of Representatives over the same time period that it spent approximately 4% of its total budget on actual lobbying.
AIPAC’s core lobbying mission hasn’t changed much since AIPAC’s founder left his Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs post in New York in 1951.
Isaiah Kenen’s mission was to obtain U.S.-taxpayer-funded weapons and aid by lobbying from a Jewish Agency funded front group of “concerned Americans” rather than working openly as Israel’s officially registered foreign agent.
In Kenen’s day, Israel first obtained massive amounts of surplus WWII conventional weapons simply by stealing or purchasing [.pdf] them to be scrapped and instead smuggling them from the United States in violation of the Arms Export Control and Neutrality Acts.
The smuggling networks were established and funded by small numbers of wealthy Zionists who were curiously immune from criminal prosecution.
When less enfranchised citizens later demanded warranted prosecutions, the Justice Department simply ignored them, establishing a policy that has held fast to the present day.
The AIPAC-sponsored U.S.-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012, signed into law by President Obama on July 27, 2012, makes unprecedented demands on U.S. taxpayers and diplomats.
It mandates American economic largess to Israel via high technology, agriculture, medicine, health, pharmaceutical, and energy transfers.
It demands funding for Israel Aerospace Industries (a corporation only recently linked to Israeli espionage activities against the U.S.) missile-defense programs and air-refueling tankers and munitions Israel could use to unilaterally set off a wider war with Iran.
Israel even won a detour of used weapons from U.S. forces departing Iraq.
The aid law extends already generous loan guarantees to Israel.
However, the package also requires the U.S. president to issue to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and House Committee on Foreign Affairs a report on the status of Israel’s “qualitative military edge” by Jan. 23, 2013.
It is finally time for some hard truths.
An honest presidential response to this AIPAC-mandated reporting rider would wipe clean all current and future U.S.-taxpayer-funded obligations to Israel.
A truthful presidential assessment would finally tell the American people the following: “Israel has deployed a clandestine nuclear arsenal with some components and materials stolen from the United States. Our foreign aid laws therefore make Israel ineligible for further taxpayer dollars.”
Such a truthful declaration would turn the tables on AIPAC and its small group of donors now pushing Americans to steal from themselves by systematically violating the Symington and Glenn amendments to U.S. foreign aid laws.
Ending aid would disentangle unwitting Americans from Israel’s unending conflicts, illegal settlements, systematized abuse of Palestinians, and clandestine nuclear proliferation in the Middle East.
*As reported in 2011, in previous years AIPAC filed contributor schedules with the IRS that improperly listed only two donor entries. After numerous complaints were made to the IRS, AIPAC has apparently been forced to again file proper schedules listing every contributor donating more than $5,000.
Read more by Grant Smith :
US-Israel Nuclear Front’s Accountability Drives Fall Apart – August 10th, 2012
Netanyahu Worked Inside Nuclear Smuggling Ring – July 3rd, 2012
Why Obama Will Free Jonathan Pollard – June 8th, 2012
US Charity Secretly Funds Israeli Nukes – May 17th, 2012
Israel’s Nuclear Triggers – March 21st, 2012
The Jewish Cartel Not QE3
From REAL JEW NEWS
By Brother Nathanael Kapner
IF THE ROOT IS ROTTEN both the tree and the fruit will be decayed. If the foundation is shifty both the walls and the roof will cave in.
For the US government to borrow money from the Jewish-owned Federal Reserve Bank AT INTEREST when it can freely coin its own money as provided by the US Constitution then something is rotten in DC.
Many are witlessly aiming their guns at Ben Shalom Bernanke…this time for his QE3 Stimulus Program to supposedly boost the economy.
Fact is, Bernanke is once again bailing out Goldman Sachs and the entire Jewish Cartel by buying $40 billion worth of “mortgage-backed securities” every month.
These are the same “bundles” and “financial products” that the Jewish-owned Fed bought with tax payer money back in 2008 with Goldman Sachs being the main recipient.
QE3 is NOT about the economy.
QE3 is about buying leftover BAD loans that the Jewish bankers participated in via subprime mortgages and making the taxpayer pay for it.
And the pawn of the big Jewish bankers, (he’s a member of the Synagogue), Ben Shalom Bernanke, is dutifully carrying out orders from the yarmulke big boyz.
ROTTEN JEWISH ROOTS
UNDER DUBIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES, Jewry’s pawn in the White House, Woodrow Wilson, pushed through the Federal Reserve Act on December 19, 1913, while most of the members of Congress were home for Christmas.
Operating as agents for Nathaniel Rothschild, the monetary resources of America were now in the hands of three Jews:
Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb Bank; Paul Warburg, appointed by Wilson as the Fed’s first Chairman; and George Blumenthal, a high official of JP Morgan.
Henceforth, the “Treasury” of the United States would forever be in the hands of the Jews.
A glance at today’s Treasury Department finds Jewish Cartelization as the status quo.
The current head of Treasury is the Fed’s boy Timothy Geithner.
(Geithner served as President of the NY Fed from 2003-2008 and as Under Secretary of the Treasury from 1999 to 2001 under Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers.)
His current assistant is former Goldman Sachs lobbyist Mark Patterson.
During the “too big to jail” scam, Henry Paulson, a former Goldman Sachs CEO, was Secretary of the US Treasury. Paulson’s main adviser was Jewish Goldman Sachs man, Steve Shafran.
The Jew Larry Summers—(a protege of Goldman Sachs’ Robert Rubin)—was head of the Treasury from 1999 to 2001 under Clinton.
Undersecretary to the Treasury from 1999 to 2001 and Assistant Secretary to the Treasury from 1997-1999 was Goldman Sachs Jewish partner, Gary Gensler, now the head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission where he covered for his Goldman Sachs buddy, Joe Corzine, in the MF Global theft of segregated accounts.
Treasury Secretary from 1995-1999, part of Clinton’s “Kosher Cabinet,” was former Co-Chairman at Goldman Sachs, the Jew Robert Rubin.
Just as Jewish investment banks own the corporations they finance, Jewish Wall Street which runs the Fed (Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase CEO’s are perennials on the NY Fed Board) also owns the megacorp, The United States of Amerika, chartered as a corporation under the 14th Amendment.
THE HAMILTON(berg) PROJECT
WHEN JEWISH PUPPET OBAMA was being propped up by the Jews for President, one of his first “showings’ was as guest speaker at the launching of Robert Rubin’s The Hamilton Project in 2006.
The aim of Rubin’s Hamilton Project was ostensibly to create an “economic platform” for the Democratic Party’s 2008 Presidential elections.
But its real goal was to ensure that Obama would not only be the next president but be surrounded by Hamilton Project boyz such as the Jews Peter Orzag (now working for Goldman Sachs) and Jason Furman.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the FIX IS IN. And the FIX has a Kosher Seal engraved on it.
We can throw stones at Bernanke all we want for ‘failed’ Fed policies from the ‘people’s point of view.’
But the Fed is a huge success for the Jewish bankers and those like their head clerk, Ben Shalom Bernanke, who live off the proceeds.
For if it’s good for the Jews (as the saying goes) then in most cases, (especially when it comes to making money), then it’s bad for Amerika…
(Fair Use Notice):
This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make ‘fair use’ of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.} ~~~ Xaniel777